The first glaring question to me is did the death of Michael Jackson cause the bankruptcy of Dr. Arnold Klein and if so, what does that say about the prescriptions that were being handed out to stay close to Jackson?

March 10, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein Status Report on his pending bankruptcy. (172) This filing is interesting because it states in part; “Dr. Arnold Klein is often referred to as and considered the father of modern cosmetic dermatology”. Arnold Klein has also filed bankruptcy in his medical corporation which is a separate case before this same court. Arnold “believes that some or all of his financial obligations were incurred as a result of fraud and/or embezzlement perpetrated by his former accountant and office manager…” It also gives us a peek into the Dr. Conrad Murray state criminal trial by stating; “Dr. Klein plans to retain the Law Offices of Garo B. Ghazarian as his criminal attorneys in connection with a subpoena issued to compel Klein’s deposition in connection with a state court criminal case. Klein also gives up a view into the rich and famous and what cutting back is to them. Be sure to read page 8 on the three properties, lawn and pool service, eat, drink and be merry and care takers for the two he does not live in. Not the normal bankruptcy here.

March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Summary Schedules (198)
March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Statistical Summary of Certain Liabilities (176)
March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Statement of Financial Affairs (191)
March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Schedule A Real Property (212) This document lists Klein’s three homes, the value and how much he still owes on each one.

March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Schedule B Personal Property (201) This is well worth a read, talking about arrogant millionaires. This lists every painting, a crystal panda bear, how things are framed, value, and where Klein bought them from. A GREAT advertisement for places like Christies and I would say not to expect this to go on sale in a yard or garage sale or even on an auction block. This to me was the best read of these papers filed.

March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Schedule C Property Eexempt from bankruptcy (178)
March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Schedule D Creditors holding Secured Claims (167)
March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Schedule E Creditors holding UNSecured Claims (162)
March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Schedule F Creditors holding UNSecured Non-priority Claims (189) Basically shows credit cards, gardeners, etc. that are maxed out, but also WHO is Michael Duffy that Klein was loaned $200k from this person, and now it is probably never going to be paid back.

March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Schedule G Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases (159)
March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Schedule H Listing Co-Debtor (161)
March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Schedule I Listing income as $30k a month (181)
March 16, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Amended Schedule J Listing PERSONAL monthly cost of living as about $26k (176)

March 24, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Motion to have both his personal and professional bankrutcy to be jointly adminstered by the Court (157)
April 1, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s SECOND Amended filing os Schedules C and F (143)

April 6, 2011 U. S. Trustee Russell Clementson Application to Appoint Patient Care Ombudsman for Klein\'s patients (154)

April 7, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Motion to Compel Bank of California to Produce Documents (145) Klein alleges someone opened at least one account in his name at this bank without his consent and then proceeded with unauthorized transactions with the bank account. Klein is seeking the information to possibly sue the bank and the person who opened the account.

April 7, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Motion to Compel Excell Nation Bank to Produce Documents (145) Klein alleges that someone without his permission made unauthorized transactions with the bank accounts Klein has at this bank without his consent and Klein is seeking the information in order to bring a suit against the person or persons who made the unauthorized transactions.

April 8, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Motion to Compel Able Investment Services to Produce Documents (150) Klein alleges that Able Investment Services, LLC, Klein is alleging that loan made by Able to Klein who holds the first deed of trust against one of Klein’s homes and Klein believes that the lien held by Able is one of the many liabilities incurred by his former business manager and/or others without Klein’s consent or knowledge.

April 15, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Motion and Memorandum of Law to Supprt Request for Order Establishing Bard Date for filing Proof of Cliams and interest to date. (64) Klein is requesting an Order from the Court that will set a date of sixty-three days from the entry of the Order to file and serve proofs of claim or interest against Klein or be forever barred from asserting those claims or interests.

April 20, 2011 Interested party 435 North Roxbury Dr. Ltd. Motion to Compel Immediate Payment and other Requests (342) Hearing set for May 18, 2011 at 9:00 AM; Interested party 435 North Roxbury Dr. Ltd. Motion to Compel Immediate Payment of Administrative Expenses arising under an unexpired lease of nonresidential property;requesting timely future performance of future lease obligations; and compelling Klein to assume or reject certain unexpired leases of personal property.

April 20, 2011 Interested party 435 North Roxbury Dr. Ltd. Exhibit A Part 1 Motion to Compel Immediate Payment and other Requests (217)
April 20, 2011 Interested party 435 North Roxbury Dr. Ltd. Exhibit A Part 2 Motion to Compel Immediate Payment and other Requests (210)

May 4, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Opposition to Interested Party, 435 North Roxbury Dr. Ltd. Motion to Compel (150)

May 9, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Monthly Operating Report for Jan 2011 (166)
May 9, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Monthly Operating Report for Feb 2011 (151)
May 9, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Monthly Operating Report for March 2011 (159)

May 10, 2011 Dr. Arnold Klein\'s Motion to Extend Exclusivity Period for filing his Chapter 11 Plan Dsiclosure and Statement (161)

May 11, 2011 Interested Party 435 North Roxbury Dr. Ltd. Reply to Klein\'s Opposition to their Motion to Compel (196)

I doubt that we will ever know what the Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate vs. Ford Shelley, G. Ben Thompson, Susan M. Brown et all, is going to end. I am willing to bet something is going on behind the scenes.

May 13, 2011 Anna Nicole Smith Estate files Joint Status Report NO Dates Available (311) On behalf of all of the parties Executor’s attorneys have filed a Status requested by the judge of the Federal Court in South Carolina as to what dates in August and September are the parties ready to go to trial because this has been pending about 3 years now, and the judge wanted to start jury selection on July 28, 2011. It appears from the filing that there are three days available in August and three days in September available for all of the parties and those dates are no where near each other.

There is no ruling on the money the Estate says Susan M. Brown owes the Estate. We have the ruling by the U. S. Supreme Court is due out by the last Monday of June 2011, but how could the parties NOT think the judge was ready to go on the South Carolina case? Whatever is up, we will never know UNLESS the judge issues an order of be here on this date or else. I doubt that will happen because the Court had already stated that it could send an Order out scheduling the trial to start at a later date then September. So what do you think the judge is going to do?

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl runs that entire section don’t hesitate to contact her to make suggestions on how this forum is more user friendly.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following.

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks and see who Rose Speaks is following.

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.

©Rose Turner
May 15, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: 435 North Roxbury Dr. Ltd., Able Investment Services, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith's Estate, Arnie Klein, Arnold Klein filed bankruptcy his medical corporation, arrogant millionaires, Beverly Hills, Celebrity Trials, considered the father of modern cosmetic dermatology, Dannielynn, Dr. Arnold Klein, Dr. Arnold Klein is often referred to as and considered the father of modern cosmetic dermatology, Dr. Conrad Murray, father of modern cosmetic dermatology, Federal Court in South Carolina, financial obligations were incurred as a result of fraud and or embezzlement, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Garo B. Ghazarian, Garo B. Ghazarian Esq., GREAT advertisement for Christies, High Profile Trials, Hollywood, Howard K Stern, interested party 435 North Roxbury Dr. Ltd., jury selection on July 28 2011, L. Lin Wood, last Monday June 2011, Law Offices of Garo B. Ghazarian, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, May 18 2011 at 9:00 AM, Michael Duffy, Michael Jackson, Michael Jackson Will, Michael Jackson's Estate, modern cosmetic dermatology, Nicole Jennings Wade, Not the normal bankruptcy, perpetrated by his former accountant and office manager, Rose Speaks Community, Rose Speaks Face Book, Rose Speaks Twitter, Susan M. Brown, Susan M. Brown Esq., U. S. Supreme Court, U. S. Supreme Court last Monday June 2011, unauthorized transactions

In a telephone hearing today in the South Carolina Federal Court Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III made the following rulings after TELEPHONE CONFERENCE with the parties and counsel.

1. Howard K. Stern on behalf of the Estate for Anna Nicole Smith had agreed to the Attorney of Record to Withdraw and the Memorandum for reasons to withdraw be sealed The Court Agreed and Ordered that the reason be sealed and Susan M. Brown’s current attorney can and as of today has withdrawn from the case.

2. Stern offered to give The Brown Law Offices and Susan M. Brown thirty days to seek new counsel. Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III ruled Brown had only ten (10) days to find new counsel or would represent herself Pro Se.

3. Smith’s Estate had offered a “reasonable period of time for the Brown defendants to have discovery”. Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III ruled that; “Court will stay scheduling deadlines for a period of 10 days

4. The Estate says the only Motion currently pending before the court is the amount of attorneys fees that Brown and her firm owes for the Contempt proceedings, no ruling on that was made today. L. Lin Wood, Luke Lantta and Nicole Jennings Wade, lead attorneys are optimistic that a mediated settlement is possible but has not happened to date, therefore if necessary the Estate is ready for final Pretrial Motions to be filed and then a jury trial.

April 21, 2011 Anna Nicole Smith's Estate Joint Status Report on Case Against Susan M. Brown Et. Al. (233)
April 14, 2011 Anna Nicole Smith's Local Counsel Request to be Excused from hearing as Lead attorney Luke Lantta will be present for Executor Howard K. Stern (276)

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl runs that entire section don’t hesitate to contact her to make suggestions on how this forum is more user friendly.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following.

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks and see who Rose Speaks is following.

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.

©Rose Turner
April 21, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Beverly Hills, Celebrity Trials, Dannielynn, Estate of Anna Nicole smith, Federal Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers III, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Gaither B. Thompson II, Gina Ford, High Profile Trials, Hollywood, Howard K Stern, L. Lin Wood, Law Offices of Susan M. Brwon P. C., Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers III, Melanie Thompson, Nicole Jennings Wade, Nicole Jennings Wade Esq., South Carolina Federal Court, Susan M. Brown, Susan M. Brown Esq.

What started out as the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. Ford Shelley, Gina Shelley, G. Ben Thompson, Gaither Thompson and Melanie Thompson, or known as the Shelley and Thompson Clan of South Carolina. The people who broke into Horizons in the Bahamas and then allegedly sold a lot of tapes and pictures to TMZ (remember the Methadone refrigerator picture), Splash (including the tasteless picture of Daniel Smith in his casket), tons of videos to Fox News including On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, Geraldo Rivera Live, and the list goes on and on. Ford was one of the first to holler, Howard K. Stern did something to Daniel and Anna Nicole Smith, and the first at the trial to say Howard never hurt Anna……… so much for credibility. The question is though where is the money that all of that sold for????

Then enters what has become the big fish, Susan M. Brown Esq., Georgia Attorney and the Susan M. Brown Law Office, did this poor woman get left holding the bag and with the O’Quinn law firm dissolved there is no one to hand it off too. Kind of like playing musical chairs and the one left standing alone when the music stops, that would be Susan M. Brown.

Brown has tap danced for two years with the same song just different steps until she finally had a Northern District of Georgia Federal Court say she had waived the attorney client privilege under the crime fraud act…… NOT good for a lawyer’s resume, not to mention the State Bar of Georgia.

Any Objections to Susan M. Brown’s current lawyers, Joseph C. Wilson IV. and Carl E. Pierce II of Pierce, Herns, Sloan & McLeod LLC, has filed to withdraw as counsel for “the Brown Defendants”, stating it would not cause any prejudice because “the discovery concerning the Brown Defendants has not begun”. Do what??? The court ruled a long time ago that because Brown has been present for all of those depositions there would not be that much extra to tidy up the suit and have it ready for trial.

However the big WHAM in the March 2, 2011 filings is asking and filing the Motion to Withdraw with the grounds set out to substantiate the withdrawing should be in a Memorandum in Support filed UNDER SEAL “Counsel is not aware of any other means to communicate the grounds for withdrawal that would protect the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship and avoid undue prejudice to the Brown Defendants.”

However the case they quote as outweighing the right of the public right to know (I. E. the News media) on its own raises red flags of the potential seriousness of these actions. In the Knight case it states; “we explained that, while a district court has a supervisory power over its own records and may, in its discretion, seal documents if the public’s right of access is outweighed by competing interests, the presumption in such cases favors public access. The public’s right of access to judicial records and documents may be abrogated ONLY IN UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES. Accordingly before a district court may seal any court documents, we held that it must 1) provide public notice of the request to seal and allow interested parties a reasonable opportunity to object. (That date was March 21, 2011 per the South Carolina Federal Court’s Docket). 2) consider less drastic alternatives to sealing the documents, and 3) provide specific reasons and factual findings supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting the alternatives.”

The Motion ends that “Counsel will submit the Memorandum in Support of the Motion to Withdraw to the Court for the Court’s in camera review and shall not file same until further notice from the Court.

Well folks I don’t think there will be any jury selection starting tomorrow, and as of midnight there has been no objections or request for a hearing on the filing being done under seal…

So what do you think Susan M. Brown needs to be protective from “avoid undue prejudice”?

As soon as we have the Court’s decision, and new dates for jury selection will post it, it is noticeable that no lawyer has filed to just transfer the case to them, as new attorney of record, things that make you go Mmmmmmmmmmmm.

HERE ARE THE THREE LATEST FILINGS:

March 2, 2011 Susan M Brown\'s Answer First Amended Complaint (196)
March 2 , 2011 Motion by Counsel for Susand M. Brown and The Brown Law Firm to Wtithdraw (306)
March 2, 2100 Counsel for Susan M Brwon Motion to File Under Seal Memorandum Reason Withdraw as Counsel (298)

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks and see who Rose Speaks is following.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.

©Rose Turner
March 22, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: allegedly sold a lot of tapes and pictures, allow interested parties a reasonable opportunity to object, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith Estate, attorney-client privilege, avoid undue prejudice, avoid undue prejudice to the Brown Defendants, before a district court may seal any court documents, Beverly Hills, Carl E. Pierce II, Carl E. Pierce II Esq., Celebrity Trials, confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship, consider less drastic alternatives to sealing the documents, Court's in camera review, crime fraud act, Daniel Smith, Daniel Smith in his casket, Dannielynn, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, favors public access, filed under seal, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Gaither Thompson and Melanie Thompson, Georgia Attorney, Geralda Rivera Live, Geraldo - Live, Geraldo At Large, Geraldo FOX News, Geraldo Rivera Live, Gina Shelley, Greta Van Sustern Fox News, High Profile Trials, Hollywood, Horizons in the Bahamas, Howard K Stern, John O'Quinn, Joseph C Wilson IV Esq., Joseph C. Wilson IV, L. Lin Wood, Law Offices of Susan M. Brown, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, March 2 2011 filings, March 21 2011, may be abrogated, Memorandum in Support, Memorandum in Support filed under seal, Methadone refrigerator picture, Methodone refrigerator picture, Motion to Withdraw, Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, Neil McCabe, Northern District of Georgia Federal Court, On The Record with Greta Van Susteren, O’Quinn law firm dissolved, Pierce Herns Sloan & McLeod LLC, playing musical chairs, potential seriousness of these actions, presumption in such cases favors public access, protect the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship, provide factual findings, provide public notice of the request to seal, provide specific reasons, provide specific reasons and factual findings supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting the alternatives, public's right of access, public's right of access is outweighed by competing interests, public's right of access may be abrogated only in unusual circumstances, public's right of access to judicial documents, public's right of access to judicial records, public's right of access to judicial records and documents, raises red flag, Shelley and Thompson Clan of South Carolina, South Carolina Federal Court's Docket, Splash, State Bar of Georgia, supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting the alternatives, Susan M. Brown, Susan M. Brown Esq., The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, undue prefudice, Virgie Arthur, waived the attorney client privilege, waived the attorney client privilege under the crime fraud act, withdraw as counsel for "the Brown Defendants

I have met Mr. L. Lin Wood Jr. briefly in 2009 and I have listened via phone as both Mr. Wood and Mr. Neal McCabe argued Motions in the Harris County Court. However I have never had the privilege of seeing any of these attorneys, L. Lin Wood, Charles “Chip” Babcock, Harry Susman, etc. argue a Motion in person.

For anyone who would like to see L. Lin Wood in a court room this Bryant v. Cox Enterprises video is a must see.

On February 9, 2011 Mr. Wood argued the case of Bryant v. Cox Enterprises in front of the Georgia Appeals Court. The state Court of Appeals’ justices hearing this case is presiding Judge J.D. Smith, who is hearing the case along with Judge Charles B. Mikell and Judge Stephen L. A. Dillard

This case is now the estate of Richard Jewell vs The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Following the death of Mr. Jewell the case became titled Bryant v Cox Enterprises. The official plaintiff in this case is now G. Watson Bryant Jr., Jewell’s former attorney, who was designated executor of Jewell’s estate in his will. Cox Enterprises is the owner of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

“I have sought justice for Richard Jewell for 14 years,” Wood told the judges.

Jewell was cleared of the Olympic Park bombing that killed one person and injured more than 100. In 2005, Eric Robert Rudolph confessed to the bombing and was sent to prison for life. Richard Jewell has since died of heart problems from a complication of his diabetes.

The estate of Richard Jewell is continuing to press the late security guard’s libel claims against the newspaper. At issue are stories published in July and August 1996 in which the newspaper reported that authorities suspected Jewell of planting the Olympic park bomb and believed he made an anonymous 911 call warning of an impending bombing. Jewell’s estate also is pressing a libel claim over a column by a Journal-Constitution sports writer that drew parallels between the investigations of Jewell and Wayne Williams, a convicted killer long considered the perpetrator of the Atlanta child murders.

Bryan Cave partner L. Lin Wood Jr., who has pursued the lawsuit against the Journal-Constitution since 1997, told the panel of Court of Appeals judges that statements in the newspaper’s articles were simply false. “We now know that Richard Jewell did not plant the bomb,” he said, saying the same was true for allegations about the 911 call. For those of us who did not follow the case of Richard Jewell and the allegations against him, Wood drew a mental picture during his argument of the horrors of that day before the appeals court including playing the audio of the anonymous 911 call and placing the words of the call on a screen. “You have just heard … the voice of someone you know is a cold-blooded killer,” Wood told the judges.

The newspaper filed a motion for summary judgment in December 1998—a motion on which Fulton County State Court Judge John R. Mather did not rule until late 2006. The appellate court had previously ruled that Jewell was a limited public figure, meaning Jewell had to prove that the newspaper acted with actual malice or reckless disregard of the truth.

Squarely at issue in the appeal heard Wednesday was Mather’s grant of summary judgment to the Journal-Constitution on all but one of Jewell’s libel claims in October 2006. Mather, ruled that the Aug. 4, 1996 story could be libelous because by then the Journal-Constitution had learned Jewell could not have made the 911 call and discovered the bomb moments later because of the distance between the two points.

Jewell’s legal team took the unusual step of all but acquiescing to the grant of summary judgment on that claim on the notion that to have the appellate courts consider Mather’s summary judgment rulings now would make multiple trials less likely. Wood’s decision to go all in with the appellate courts, rather than go to trial on Jewell’s claim over the Aug. 4 story, may mean a trial in the case never happens.

On the Aug. 4 Journal-Constitution story, Justice Smith wanted to know more about the column referencing Williams. Peter C. Canfield of Dow Lohnes, the newspaper’s longtime lead attorney on the case told the judges that the column didn’t say Jewell was guilty and the column suggested that investigators searching his mother’s apartment weren’t finding any evidence. Justice Smith asked, “you’re saying Journal-Constitution copy editors—who testified in depositions that they had expressed concern about the column before it ran—had no reason for concern?” Canfield responded that “Their concern was fairness, not falsity.”

On rebuttal, Wood said the copy editors said the column was libelous because of the comparison with Williams. And Wood took umbrage at Canfield’s previous suggestions that Jewell’s side has litigated the case with an eye more to the media and movie deals than having the case resolved on the merits.

If you have not seen the brief video of the Anna Nicole Smith Opera that has sold out all six performances in London at the Royal London Opera and is receiving good reviews I suggest viewing that short video.

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks and see who Rose Speaks is following.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

I have also updated the Michael Jackson’s downloads so be sure and browse through those papers.

On February 16, 2011 the South Carolina Court issued an Order and Opinion denying Susan M. Brown’s request to dismiss the suit in regards to her personally and her law firm. The court docket shows jury selection is to begin on February 22, 2011 for that case.

©Rose Turner
February 19, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: a trial in the case may never happen, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith Opera, anonymous 911 call warning of an impending bombing, Beverly Hills, Bryan Cave partner, Bryant v. Cox Enterprises, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, cold-blooded killer, concern was fairness, Constitution copy editors, copy editors said the column was libelous, Dannielynn, Dow Lohnes, Eric Robert Rudolph, estate of Richard Jewell, Fulton County State Court Judge John R. Mather, G. Watson Bryant Jr., G. Watson Bryant Jr. Esq., Georgia Appeals Court, Harry Susman, High Profile Trials, Hollywood, Howard K Stern, Jewell has since died of heart problems, Journal-Constitution, Judge Charles B. Mikell, Judge J.D. Smith, Judge John R. Mather, Judge Stephen L. A. Dillard, justice for Richard Jewel, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Lin Wood gambles all of nothing, London UK, Neil McCabe, newspaper reported that authorities suspected Jewell, Nicole Jennings Wade, Nicole Jennings Wade Esq., Olympic park bomb, Olympic Park bombing, Peter C. Canfield, Peter C. Canfield Esq., Royal London Opera, stories published in July and August 1996, Susan M. Brown, Susan M. Brown Esq., the Atlanta child murders, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Richard Jewell Case, Wayne Williams

Please note on the right hand side of the main page is a scrolling calendar. –>–>–>–>–>–>–>–>–>–>–>

This will always have the next thirty days of upcoming important dates on cases we are covering and is the final part of transferring from the old “main site” to the blog as the main site. Please remember that if you are a member of the forums there is a calendar link at the top right header of that page.

We have two scheduled maintenance this week on the blog software and on the contact us software. If you are a new reader here and have a tip for a case you want to give us then please use the contact us button at the top of each page. We want to hear from you and what you want. This leaves only the updated documents that are still not relinked, however with each article we do on each case we are putting up the downloads up to date on that case. We hope to have a document link at the top of the page as we catch up that will give you the ease of all cases you want papers too. If you want or need one of the papers that are not linked yet drop us an email and we will get that right out to you.

On the Anna Nicole Smith Estate vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley etc. I am did not see any papers filed by some deadline for December 28. I tried to figure out if it was a Response by Susan M. Brown’s being added to the suit as well as Gina Shelley, Gaither B. Thompson II and his wife Melodie Thompson. It could be a Reply by the Estate due on a Response filed by one of the defendants in regards to the Motions for Contempt, Sanctions and Joiner of additional parties. Which ever it was it was not filed on time unless there is a delay on showing up on PACER.

December 29, 2009, G. Ben Thompson filed an Objection to his attorney Mr. Joyce’s Withdrawal as attorney of Record of Thompson in the federal case of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley et al. I wonder if this is the reason that the Responses or Replies due on December 28 have not been filed?

On the Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern, TMZ, et. al. in the 80th District Court of Houston, signed an Order yesterday on December 28 giving the Plaintiff Leave (permission) to file the late documents in response to CBS Motion for Summary Judgment, and also giving CBS Request to supplemental their evidence for the Summary Judgment we should have a copy of this later today for your downloading pleasure. This Order appears to be no win or win for both Arthur and CBS, the new judge is allowing both of them to supplement their filings in reference to CBS Motion for Summary Judgment.

Tomorrow we will list the five cases we feel was the worse or the most bizarre, we would like to hear which ones you found that way. You can use the archive months found on the right hand side of the main pages for you to do a quick review to pick the five you want to list.

On December 31 we will list the five cases that we feel were the best of the cases or had something unusual happened during that case that changed the dynamics of that case. Again we would like for you to list your cases you thought was best of had something unusual that changed the dynamics.

I will have a short article up later today with links to some of the documents and some musings on who and who not are looking forward to television reality series or be part of a documentaries, it will surprise you we think.

Thanks for flying Rose Speaks.com and by the New Year the changes will be complete on what you will find an easier way to navigate easier.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
December 29, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

__

Tags: 80th District Court Harris County Texas, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith's Estate, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, CBS-ET, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Dannielynn, District Court Houston, Ford Shelley, Ford Shelly, G Ben Thompson, Gaither B. Thompson II, Giana Thompson Shelley, Gina Shelley, Gina Shelly, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, L. Lin Wood, Law Offices of Susan M. Brown PLC, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Melodie Thompson, Melody Thompson, Neil McCabe, Rose Speaks, Rose Speaks.com, Rose Speaks.com site maintenance, Rose Speaks.com updates, Rose Turner, Susan M. Brown, Susan M. Brown Esq., Teresa Stephens, The O'Quinn Law Firm, Virgie Arthur

Yesterday, December 7, 2009, in the federal court for South Carolina, the Estate for Anna Nicole Smith filed additional documents of why attorney Susan M. Brown should be held in contempt of court, be sanction and added to the suit.

This is the case people I can’t write any opinions of a professional person image in Georgia, however the Estate’s filings say in much more detail then I could express.

So here or the papers without further comment:

December 7, 2009, G. Ben Thompson Request to be Join with the answer filed by Susan M. Brown in Response to the Motion of Contempt and Sanctions.

December 7, 2009 Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Contempt and Sanctions as it concerns Susan M. Brown.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit B filed with the Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Contempt and Sanctions as it concerns Susan M. Brown.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit C filed with the Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Contempt and Sanctions as it concerns Susan M. Brown.

December 7, 2009 Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate’s Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint; and for the Joiner of Additional Defendants as it concerns Susan M. Brown, attorney, and the Law Office of Susan M. Brown, P. C. to the federal court suit in South Carolina. This contains the belief of Smith’s Estate as to the wrong doing by Brown and how she waived the attorney client privilege as ruled by the North District of Georgia in its ruling regarding Brown’s Motion to Quash Subpoena.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit A Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate’s Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit B Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate’s Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit C Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate’s Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit D Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate’s Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint.

©Rose Turner
December 8, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith's Estate, Anna Nicole Smith's Estate Executor, Celebrity Trials, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Federal Court South Carolina, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, Howard K. Stern esq., Howard K. Stern Executor, L. Lin Wood, Law Offices of Susan M. Brwon P. C., Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, North District of Georgia federal court, Rita Cosby, Susan M. Brown, Susan M. Brown Esq., Susan M. Brown Georgia Attorney, Susan M. Brown PC, The O'Quinn Law Firm

In South Carolina where the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith is suing Ford Shelley and G. Ben Thompson in anticipation that the court will allow the adding of Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Thompson II, Melody Thompson and Susan M Brown, Ben Thompson has now turned in an affidavit supporting Brown’s release from that suit.

The pending Motion for Leave to add the four additional parties is still due for filing Answers no latter than November 16, 2009 at which time the Court will set read any Responses and then issues any appropriate Orders.

The Court canceled the “In Camera” hearing for the release of both of G. Ben Thompson’s attorneys that was scheduled on November 3. No reason was given by the Court of who requested or why the hearing was canceled.

The latest filings in that case is the filing again of the same conflict of interest and request to be released as counsel of Susan M. Brown and an Affidavit by G. Ben Thompson acknowledging that Brown would probably be added to the suit and stating due to that reason Thompson had no objections.

November 5, 2009 Susan Brown second filing to be released as counsel for G. Ben Thompson after hearing on November 3, 2009 was canceled by the court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2626.

November 5, 2009 G. Ben Thompson Affidavit in Support of the Court releasing Susan Brown as his attorney since it seems imminent that Brown is going to be added as a co-defendant.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2627.

We are expecting filings by Elizabeth McNamara on behalf of Rita Cosby and L. Lin Wood on behalf of Howard K. Stern to be filed in New York by tomorrow, November 9.

We also expect a filing in the Texas State Court tomorrow or early this week in Response by Virgie Arthur to CBS’ request for Summary Judgment we will be adding that as soon as we receive that filing.

New filings in California in the Bankruptcy of Bonnie Stern and the Adversarial Proceding of Virgie Arthur vs. Bonnie Stern. that we will be adding today and a new section for the latest case to spring up over all of this in Texas and listing those papers as we receive them.

September 17, 2009 The Bankruptcy Court in California discharged Bonnie Stern’s bankruptcy except of the adversarial case filed by Virgie Arthur.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2628.

September 22, 2009 In the Adversarial Proceeding of Virgie Arthur vs. Bonnie Stern this is a joint status report asking for the next status hearing to by January 12, 2010. The Appeals Court in Texas has issued a Stay on the January 27, 2009 Order appointing the Special Master Craig Ball which his report on Stern was the reason a default judgment was issued against Stern. If that is overturned by either the three cases pending in the First Court of Appeals or in the case before the Supreme Court of Texas, then there is the question if that in itself will make the striking of Stern’s pleadings to be thrown out. Then there is the big question with the October 30, 2009 filing of John M. O’Quinn’s Will which states that the three trustees in place to dissolved his firm The O’Quinn Law Firm, how will that impact the current case in both Texas as well as California. Normally the conditions of the Will are resolved within nine months of the filing of the Will in all matters so the Estate can file a final inventory and pay Estate Income Tax.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2629.

November 5, 2009 The released transcript of the Hearing from April 2009 in which Neil McCabe was present to address the Court about both the adversarial Motion to be filed by Virgie Arthur and also a note about him attending the first arraignment hearing on Howard K. Stern and both doctors earlier the same day.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2630.

LATEST TEXAS FILINGS

November 9, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Response to CBS Motion for Summary Judgment before the evidential part of a lawsuit.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2631.

Exhibit A is a Certified Copy of Virgie Arthur’s Fourth Amended Original Petition filed August 14, 2009.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2349.

November 9, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Exhibit B Article by Art Harris dated April 22, 2007 with all comments included filed with Response to CBS Motion for Summary Judgment before the evidential part of a lawsuit.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2632.

November 9, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Exhibit C Article by Art Harris dated May 27, 2007 with all comments included filed with Response to CBS Motion for Summary Judgment before the evidential part of a lawsuit.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2633.

November 9, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Exhibit D Sworn Statement of Chrystal Baker, [Havana], dated May 2008 filed with all comments included filed with Response to CBS Motion for Summary Judgment before the evidential part of a lawsuit.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2634.

November 9, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Exhibit E Certified Copy of transcript of the three night interview by Art Harris of Larry Hart in a Texas Prison, Exhibit F, Order by Court Allowing the Designated Third Party of CBS and Exhibit H noticed of certified DVD of interview by Art Harris to be delivered to the Court and all parties of the suit, these were filed with all comments included filed with Response to CBS Motion for Summary Judgment before the evidential part of a lawsuit.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2635.

Remember our documents are opened to All, not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

©Rose Turner
November 8, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, CBS-ET, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Don Clark, Elizabeth McNamara, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Gaither B. Thompson II, Gina Thompson Shelley, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Melody Thompson, Neil McCabe, Rita Cosby, Rose Turner, Stancil Ford Shelly, Susan M. Brown, Susan M. Brown Esq., Teresa Stephens, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Virgie Arthur