Posts Tagged “Rose Speaks Face Book”

Rose Speaks.com will be getting a new look in the next few weeks. It will allow you to find what you want to read much faster, and will still have all of the downloads we keep for our readers.

This might be slow as the new rules for blogs to appear on Google has been tighten up and what worked in 2007-2010 will no longer get it.

Keep checking back and once we have a new look up be sure and leave us a note with your thoughts.

Tags: , ,

Comments Comments Off on Rose Speaks.com is changing!!

Dean Esmay

Dean Esmay

Paul Elam

Paul Elam

I have to admit I don’t get why people misrepresent facts and then rile people up into a frenzy and send them out on the internet to do havoc and think there is no day of reckoning. I read a comment today that said

“so what if the guy, [Paul Elam], could eat kittens and rape children”

and that would not be as bad as a satirical video on spaghetti and meatballs that John Nazarian did over 2 years ago. What kind of people would equate that raping children was OK but satirical videos are not??? I notice the leaders of this group are very careful to pick the words that write to their followers, saying John removed the video from You Tube, they fail to tell their readers that the video is available here, on John’s site and on Vimeo. They encourage their followers to do something called “mirroring” of the video to the point that the copyright cannot be protected or enforce and that this somehow exonerates those that have asked this be done. I have no idea what mirroring is, but it does not sound nice. Further it is my understanding that John removed his videos from You Tube and went to a paid service because of the ads being ran on his You Tube videos. Nothing wrong with anyone choosing to pay for a service that does not show ads before a video starts. So why mislead their own fans/readers/followers. However the video they find of a “criminal nature” is up for them to share the link with their readers so why is this vitriol needed? Why stir people who believe your words into a frenzy of activity that you know is either immoral, unethical or out right libelous? It is not like Paul Elam and Dean Esmay does not know what a satirical video is, they hide behind that all of the time when people try to make them responsible for their actions, so why lie to their fans/readers/followers?

As the readers of this site know from 2007 – 2009 the owners and moderators of this site were targeted in a libel suit. Bloggers went to jail, hard drives were imaged, and yet Rose Speaks.com remained calm, shared ALL of court documents, even those that made the owners come under scrutiny. We promised to do that before we were dragged into that lawsuit and we stayed true to the end of that lawsuit. So we know all to well what can happen to innocent people who are not trying to get an internet mob riled into hateful frenzies. At that time because we were totally transparent we had millions of readers, I hope that A Voice for Men will update their documents for their fans/readers/followers so everyone knows if they even received an answer to their July 2013 letter. It is hard to have a blog and cover a case with transparency even when you are dragged into that case, however we did that and were the better for being that open.

There is a rule of thumb here in the blog world, “Would you say that to someone’s face, would you swear to that in court or a deposition?” If any of that makes you pause and think then don’t do it. Someone is going to have the money to fight in court and tangle up these people in a nightmare of years of court actions, not to mention contempt of court orders etc. Now that bloggers have the same rights as journalists they also have the same responsibility as journalists. You can’t holler fire in a movie theater and then say it is not your fault the crowds ran over each other or you were just joking. The same goes for careless publications on the internet, NOTHING is anonymous these days and we had to fight long and hard to protect the identity of our posters during that trial from 2007-2009.

Then there is the ongoing rhetoric of fear and false statements that indictments are coming down in Los Angeles. That started in March 2013, then May 2013 and with this final Hacker Claim that the “Security Was Lax” so it is NOT His Fault. (0 downloads) from July 2013. It is easy to do some mild research and see again they are misrepresenting facts to their fans/readers/followers. In California there are two grand juries, one Civil and one Criminal.

The civil grand jury is empaneled for a year beginning July 1st of every year.

The civil, or “watchdog,” responsibilities of the grand jury encompass the examination of all aspects of the county government, including special districts, to ensure that the county is being governed honestly and efficiently and that county monies are being handled appropriately. The Grand Jury is mandated by law to inquire into the condition and management of public jails.

…Any private citizen, county official, or county employee may present a complaint in writing to the Civil Grand Jury. The Civil Grand Jury limits its investigations to possible felonies and to charges of malfeasance (wrong doing) or misfeasance (doing a lawful act in an unlawful manner) by public officials. Any request for an investigation must include detailed evidence supporting the complaint. If the grand jurors believe that the evidence submitted is sufficient, a detailed investigation will be held.

…Communications from the public can provide valuable information to the Civil Grand Jury. If the Civil Grand Jury determines that a matter drawn to its attention is within the legally permissible scope of its investigative powers and would warrant further inquiry, the Civil Grand Jury may request additional information. If a matter does not fall within the Civil Grand Jury’s investigative authority, or the Civil Grand Jury determines not to further investigate a complaint, no action will be taken and there will be no further contact by the Civil Grand Jury.

…The Grand Jury has no jurisdiction or authority to investigate federal agencies, state agencies, or the courts. The jurisdiction of the Civil Grand Jury is limited by statute and includes the following:

Inquiry into all public offenses committed or triable within the county and presenting them to the court by indictment.

Consideration of evidence of misconduct against public officials to determine whether to present formal accusations requesting their removal from office.

The inquiry into the condition and management of public prisons with in the county.

Well that could investigate “perhaps” the judicial branch the above letter under the guise of “misconduct against public officials”. The letter lists a long group of people who they claim are violating laws of California, however this grand jury cannot investigate police officers, detectives, private investigators, attorneys, publicists or citizens. So nothing will come of mailing all of this alleged evidence to them. In fact I read the notes from July 2013 of cases submitted and if any of those submitted materials were being held over for the next Civil Grand Jury. There are no cases being held over and those submitted by citizens for the most part was dismissed with no actions because they were out of the scope of the Civil Grand Jury.

Then it must be the Criminal Grand Jury that the letter of allegations are made, let’s look at that.

This selected criminal grand jury will be impaneled throughout the year according to the District Attorney’s needs, and shall have exclusive jurisdiction to return criminal indictments when impaneled.

…In Los Angeles County the Criminal Grand Jury attends hearings to weigh evidence brought by the District Attorney’s Office in order to determine on the basis of this evidence whether certain persons should be charged with crimes and required to stand trial in the Superior Court. The Criminal Grand Jury is an accusatory body and not a trial jury; therefore, the burden of proof is much lower. Specifically, the Criminal Grand Jury must decide if there is a strong suspicion the individual committed the crime alleged.

Under current policy, the Criminal Grand Jury is formed monthly and the term of service should not exceed thirty (30) calendar days.

…The main function of the Criminal Grand Jury is to bring criminal indictments against individuals accused of committing crimes. The District Attorney or the Attorney General presents indictments to the Criminal Grand Jury. A vote of 14 or more Criminal Grand Jurors is required to return an indictment.

Normally, felony cases are presented to a “court of lesser jurisdiction” and the judge determines if there is sufficient evidence to hold a trial. However, under certain circumstances the District Attorney may ask the Criminal Grand Jury to hear special felony cases. The Criminal Grand Jury may hear cases involving prominent public figures in order to prevent prejudicial pretrial publicity, to protect against publicity based on unfounded charges, as well as cases where victims and witnesses need to be protected. The Criminal Grand Jury rarely hears misdemeanor cases.

Additionally, during criminal investigations the District Attorney’s Office may request the assistance of the Criminal Grand Jury to subpoena needed documents or records and to question reluctant witnesses under oath.

…If an indictment is not returned, all records are kept secret and there is no publicity.

There is a lot more of this at the site for L. A. County Civil and Criminal Grand Jury. However it is obvious that the Civil Grand Jury would have closed this out as not within their jurisdiction. The Criminal Grand Jury sits for 30 days at a time and can be held over past the 30 days if they are working or hearing evidence in a case. Certainly this is not the circumstance of the allegations made by Paul Elum and Dean Esmay, so why keep writing articles or posts that “indictments are almost here”. They obviously know these are not true statements.

This group have posted John Nazarian’s private investigator’s license number and Executive Security license number. No problem with that, it is up on John’s site and he must have both licenses to operate in California. However, to ask that people flood the agency with letters of no personal knowledge trying to get John’s license suspended and accusing him and others of “federal crimes include; Civil Rights Violations, Deprivations of Rights under Color of Law, and Honest Services Fraud. A partial list of state violations include; Perjury, Conspiracy, Fraud, Battery, Obstruction of Justice, and quite possibly; Homicide”. These allegations are serious and ludicrous when you look at the people targeted on the list. In my opinion from what we went through what these people are writing would be covered under “Libel with malicious intent”. Not to mention trying to prevent John Nazarian from going about his daily activities necessary to do the job he is hired to do, whether it be surveillance or going through garbage or providing security. I don’t know if John Nazarian would waste his time with these people unless the licensing agencies are being bombarded with clear libel.

That said others targeted by this group or associated groups such as Fathers4Justice include Kate Winslet who has hired legal teams to stop ads being ran against her parenting style in rag mags. The groups says the next to be targeted will include Kim Basinger, Katie Holmes and Halle Berry. If this happens I predict there will be lawsuits in courts in the U. K. for years to come with plenty of money to throw at these activist groups. We have been told that Fathers4Justice is based out of California.

On John’s site he has a clip of a video where Paul Elam and Dean Esmay or suggested that rape victims in college take selfies of themselves to prove they are being raped while laughing at this concept with no thought of the effect on rape victims.

I am sure that Dean Esmay and Paul Elum meant this as satirical comment and not to be taken seriously [wink wink].

John Nazarian intends to have a two hour radio program on February 9, 2014 with a star panel of experts that will address why advocates turn to malicious activists. Be sure you tune in at 7 PM PST.

If any lawsuits are filed in federal courts in the U. S., we will be covering them with papers that can document what is being done in court.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
January 29, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 2 Comments »

Francis Coyote Shivers and Pauley Perrette in happier days

After being busted AGAIN for violating a restraining Order last spring in March, I decided to let my fingers do the walking and find out if the Coyote is in jail yet. Sadly to say it appears no one in Hollywood goes to jail.

However, during my fingers doing some walking I found where the Coyote had conned a group to do his dirty work for him. Yeppers a men’s group from the Lone Star Great State of Texas, sorry about that y’all!!

The Coyote has been a busy little beaver; married again to a very very young woman with you guessed it… MONEY!!! If the Coyote could con woman after woman all with money then how very easy to con a group that wants to give him a voice. I could almost feel sorry for them, but they should have done some background research before allowing this coyote to use them.

These people seem NOT to believe in restraining orders, that allegations of abuse are always lies from women, in fact they believe it is the men who are abused. Yes that kind of group. Poor poor Coyote, they are taking up his cause and filed what looked like a letter about sending legal advice and suggestions to California from Texas… I bet the people in California got a good laugh about that, Texas trying to tell anyone how to run their court systems.

I regress here; back to the story of the Coyote, seems TMZ was there to snap the pictures, several pictures of Coyote and his new wife as she bailed him out of jail in March 2013 AND he got face time on TMZ… what wannabes will do for that high of scrolling through the internet and seeing a picture of themselves.

In that respect the little coyote has been a busy little guy. I was only able to find one interview given by Ms. Perrette and it was way back in 2006, nothing since. Interesting how many alias Coyote has, including Paul Edwards and Frank Keber, a busy coyote or a hiding coyote.

The same journalist wrote an updated article this past March, no interview or even a comment from representatives of Pauley Perrette. However, Francis “Coyote” Shivers posed for pictures, told the press or TMZ where he was being booked and after his new young wife posted bail, gave interviews to anyone who would listen about how wrong he had been done. I know you feel about now you need a shower.

If Coyote’s cheerleaders are to be believed everyone who said Coyote CAME into the restaurant and started a verbal altercation with Ms. Perrette and her dinner guest ALL would be lying. The police, who were called, showed up and promptly arrested Coyote, ALL lying. The Los Angeles Threat Management detectives, all highly trained, ALL lying. You get to lawyers her ex-private investigator that caught the coyote red handed, you got it, ALL lying. The attorneys and prosecutors, again ALL lying, and the best part, current sitting judges and retired judges involved in this case, ALL lying.

The cheerleaders say indictments for Ms. Perrette, police persons, detectives, attorneys, and judges are all coming from a grand jury in Los Angeles because of letters this group wrote, NOT GOING to HAPPEN. I would love to read the responses this group received but alas those are not posted, just their guns blazing letter to everyone and anyone with a title from local to state to federal offices in Los Angeles and California. They were all blitzed with letters demanding investigations, responses, and charges filed. Then you get to the media that coyote says are in cahoots with Perrette and they are ALL lying unless they speak his truth!!!

Let’s say for a minute that you believed the Coyote’s allegations against his ex-wife, why oh why would he walk into a restaurant, see her and not turn around and walk out??? Oh right, everyone there ALL lying… This would not even sale in the land called Hollywood.

Then there is the video that proves that Perrette’s ex-private investigator is, OH YES, a criminal and it has been saved because they are sure it will disappear off of the internet. Well folks here it is with a disclaimer on the You Tube page that this video is for entertainment purposes only and was done for a “pitch” back in 2012, something they left off when they put it up with their allegations of the big bad PI who is a criminal…. Give me a break…

Yes it is John J Nazarian with his sarcasm and dry humor, the same things that made him the person most people could remember from Divorce Corp. That has to really miff the coyote and his cheerleaders.

Why is Francis “Coyote” Shivers, a Canadian even in our country this long? He is married to a Brazilian woman, he no longer is married to any American citizen. He has been convicted of stalking and a restraining order stays in place and has to be renewed when it is about to run out. It appears from his IMDb page that he has earned no money, therefore paid no taxes in the U. S. So why isn’t he being told to pack up his coyote bag and move along? Why are the good citizens of California paying for this guy to appear in their courts?

Fact check here, there is 20%-25% of men who are abused and/or stalked, but there are 70% of women who are abused, stalked and sadly sometimes killed by men they are or were in a relationship with.

wile e. coyote-malcontentIn closing, it appears no one goes to jail or is deported to their homeland in Hollywood. My advice, if asked, keep getting those restraining orders renewed and when this slime ball gets anywhere near you RUN don’t walk to the nearest police officer. A long history of doing this over and over again to different women is nothing to ignore! You have to feel a tad badly for the young woman he is currently married to and wonder if the clock is ticking for her??? Never fear if she needs support in the future his two previous victims have large shoulders and will let her cry on them and understand what and why she is trying to get people to believe her.

This is my editorial opinion of when a coyote goes bad!

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
January 14, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 9 Comments »

President John F Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy

Where were you the day President John F Kennedy was assassinated? Many of you were not yet born or so young you have no memory of that day or the days that followed. For those of us up to and including the baby boomers born up to 1953 remember exactly where we were when we heard the news. Horrifically for those of us who lived in Dallas Texas have lived that day over and over so many times we are seldom away from the memories especially in November of each year.

I was 15 years old and in the ninth grade at Greiner Jr. High School in Oak Cliff Texas. I was in gym at the time. For those of you who did not go to school back then we wore ugly one piece white cotton iron and starched gym suits, as ugly as they sound. If I can find one in one of my old class books from those years I will scan a picture and put it up later today.

One of my friend’s mother had found out she had some time off and a few of us were asked to call our parents and get permission and we would be able to get dressed and hurry up to drive to where the President was to have lunch and see him before he left Dallas. I rushed to the pay phone to call my mom. She answered and I excitedly told her what I was going to get to do and beg her; “mom, please let me go we have time to get there and I ssssssssoooooooooooo want to see the president, but I need your permission to leave school”. The excitement in my voice as well as the urgency to get her permission so I could be on my way was evident in my voice.

My mom was somber and I thought I heard sadness in her voice when she told me I couldn’t go. I interrupted her and began to beg…. she stopped me and said “hon., the president is dead, he was murdered at the triple underpass in downtown Dallas. Do you want to come home”?

I only remember hanging up the phone and ran back into the gym and ran up to our teacher and broke down in sobs, sobbing over and over again that the president was dead, and there stood the whole class. The teacher got on to me and scolded me saying that was not true and where had I heard something so horrible. I sobbed all the louder and was able to final get out that I had called my mom and she told me. The class was in disarray, the teacher and the students were not sure they believed me and many were getting ready to leave to go see him.

I don’t know how long it was every, minute was like an hour, but finally the principal came on the intercom and told us that President John F. Kennedy had been killed in Dallas that day and school was being dismissed early.

I went home and watched our black and white TV, hanging onto my mom for the next days, day after day as we watched a thirty-four year old woman…the First Lady, Jacqueline Kennedy… hold a nation together. I will always remember watching live as she arrived at Andrews with the casket and Robert Kennedy jumped up to be with her and the casket as they lowered it and put it in the hearse. I remember I was watching TV early in the wee hours of the morning in the darkness as my mom and I cried together when we saw this young woman follow her husband’s casket into the white house still wearing the blood soaked dress and hose.

My mom’s birthday was November 24th, we didn’t celebrate it that year.

I have never been to Neely Plaza again without thinking of that day. I need no TV specials today. I know where I was the day the president was murdered. Where were you?

I have written this with tears blurring my vision so if there are misspelled words forgive me, Ken will edit it later today… “Can you tell me where my good friend John has gone”….. a beautiful song I have also loved and shared tears every time I have ever heard it.

FOOTNOTEI have never believed in the magic bullet theory. I grew up in a house of hunters, and my dad and brother always said, even with a small caliber rifle if the president had been shot in the back of the head, the exit wound is the one that would have bigger and that is the reason they and I always believed in the multiple shooters. It is the right back of his head that is gone, the front in all of those pictures was always in tact. Why did the first lady crawl of on the back of the car to recover part of the head and brains of her husband? I found GREAT comfort in what Secretary of state John Kerry recently said, if he does not believe in the magic bullet theory, that gives me comfort and gives me peace of mind for the duration of my life. I will never know the truth but perhaps my husband and son will one day.

Talk to us on our Face Book page where this article will appear!

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
November 22, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on Where were you the day John F Kennedy was Murdered?

JonBenet Ramsey murdered in 1996

On either CNN or AJA I saw an interview with a man, assumed a previous boulder detective. In that interview he said that a new grand jury should be convened and that Burke Ramsey should be made to testify about what he knew about what happened in the early morning hours of Dec. 26, 1996 with his parents. Have any of you seen that interview and if so do you remember who it was, it was a dark haired man, and what channel it was on?

After that and the statement issued by L. Lin Wood I found this in a news source this morning:

“Among the witnesses who had gone before the Grand Jury were the Ramseys’ housekeeper, the best friend with whom they’d spent Christmas, and her brother Burke. There had been handwriting and DNA testimony. (John and Patsy Ramsey were never called to testify.) But in the end, Hunter had decided it wasn’t enough to prosecute JonBenet’s parents for her death.”

Which brings up the question what could Burke Ramsey remember now 16 years later?

When we asked attorney L. Lin Wood about this he had heard of the interview I referred to but had not seen it. He sent us the same statement that he has issued throughout the weekend.

“The documents released today validate John Ramsey’s position that the Boulder District Attorney should release the entire grand jury record and not just 4 pages from an 18-month investigation that produced volumes of testimony and exhibits. The grand jury’s true bills on Counts 4(a) and 7 are nonsensical. They reveal nothing about the evidence reviewed by the grand jury and are clearly the result of a confused and compromised process. The Ramsey Family and the public are entitled to the benefit of the full and complete record, not just a historical footnote. Fairness dictates that result.”

“It is also extremely important to keep in mind that the released documents from 1999 were the product of a grand jury that did not have the benefit of the conclusive 2008 DNA testing that led to the unequivocal, public exoneration of the Ramsey Family by the Boulder District Attorney. That DNA evidence also established that in 1999, the Boulder District Attorney rightfully refused to pursue criminal charges against John or Patsy, despite the Grand Jury true bills.”

Here is the two page indictment for you to read:

Computer “Hacker” Claim that the “Security Was Lax” so it is NOT His Fault faces 70 years in Prison if Convicted. (0 downloads)

Do you think Mr. Wood has a strong argument that this indictment in 1999 basically means nothing after the DNA tests in 2008? Do you think this case will ever be solved? What do you feel and think that once again John Ramsey has been thrown into the public arena?

Talk to us on our Face Book page where this story will appear!

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
October 28, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on Should New Grand Jury be Convened in the JonBenet Ramsey Murder Case?

L Lin Wood sues National Enquirer for Natalee Holloway's mom Beth Holloway

“Based on the foregoing considerations, the motion to dismiss and for partial summary judgment filed by the defendants (doc. 16) is due to be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion to dismiss and for partial summary judgment is due to be DENIED as to the plaintiff’s claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. The motion to dismiss is due to be GRANTED as to plaintiff’s invasion-of-privacy claim, and that claim is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

So how did Lin Wood and Beth Holloway win? In this quote: “Based on the foregoing considerations, the motion to dismiss and for partial summary judgment filed by the defendants (doc. 16) is due to be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion to dismiss and for partial summary judgment is due to be DENIED as to the plaintiff’s claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.”

I am still reading through the court’s 33 page opinion but wanted to get this up for all of you that have been following the tragedy of Natalie Holloway and now her mother’s lawsuit against the National Enquirer.

I have also downloaded ALL of the Motions that led to the Court’s decision today, or those with exhibits not filed under seal. Ken and I will be working tonight to get ALL of the up for you to read.

One of our favorite attorneys and his law firm has struck another win on behalf of the small guy, or as Dan Rather put it the “voice for the damned”.

Terry Christensen, If you Love me Anthony Pellicano, DON’T TAPE Me, John Nazarian is Back with His Take on this Trial. (0 downloads)

KEEP CHECKING BACK TONIGHT FOR ALL OF THE MOTIONS WE HAVE DOWNLOADED

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
May 22, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 1 Comment »

L Lin Wood and Melanie Osgood

Socialite and famed Libel Defamation attorney L. Lin Wood and Melanie Osgood announced their engagement over the weekend at the Ritz Carlton at Reynolds Plantation where Wood had proposed to his bride to be earlier.

We had scooped this before this weekend but had been asked to hold off on announcing this, something we are always willing to do when requested.

Looking at this picture it was well worth the wait and being big fans of Lin Wood in courtrooms and lawsuits, we here at Rose Speaks, especially Ken and Rose, wish Lin and the lovely Melanie only happiness. Many have said, including us, that Lin Wood radiates with happiness in this picture as does Ms. Osgood.

Melanie works full time as an underwriter for Chubb, after graduating from University of Georgia – Terry College of Business and studied abroad at Oxford University in England before moving to Atlanta. She is the daughter of Kendall and LuAnn Osgood of Snellville, Georgia.

…and the rest is the stuff of story book tales with a story book ending, the kind we all love to see happen to good people!

We intend to stay on top of this as wedding plans are announced!

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
April 1, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 7 Comments »

Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith