Once in a while our justice system works as it should.

GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS IN MIKE ‘GOMBERT’ YEPREMYAN TEEN TEXT MURDER TRIAL

Zareh Manjikian and Vahagn Jurian guilty of murder and other charges.

Hovic Dzhuryan and his sister Khatun ‘Kat’ Vardanyan guilty of conspiracy to commit murder

Mike Yepremyan was murdered November 2009 and the trial began just a few weeks ago June 2012. Mike is the first highlighted teen text murder case in the U. S. involving the California Homicide Detectives, the U. S. Marshalls as the murderers fled the U. S. and the FBI for those hiding here.

On the Yepremyan murder case it was the lawyers, Michael Levin, Esq. Alex Kessel, Esq., Levin is representing Zareh Manjikian and Kessel is representing Vahag Jurian. Also present everyday is Hovic Dzhuryan and his sister Kat Vardanian, Anthony Brooklier is representing Kat and George Mgdesyan is representing Hovic.

Judge Gregory A. Dohi of the Los Angeles Superior Court is presiding, Dept. E. Judge Dohi has only been a judge since being appointed August 29, 2007. Prior to that he attended a mid level university back East, Harvard!! And then went to Boalt Hall School of Law, one thing we can say is that this guy has educational credentials in the highest categories of law.

Judge Dohi was admitted to the bar in 1991 and joined the District Attorney’s office as a prosecutor.

Artak and Arni Yepreyman was in the court for the reading of the verdicts. Let’s hope as each GUILTY!!! was read they found some peace in God’s hands, that our justice system although slow, can work! We do not know if Danielle, Mike’s former girlfriend was present but as we get updates you will get updates.

Special thanks to Lt. Hamilton and Detective Thomas Townsend, of North Hollywood Division of the L.A.P.D. Homicide and their team of team of homicide cops, The Los Angeles Grand Jury for indicting these four and Office Kirkpatrick and John J Nazarian Celebrity PI who just could not walk away from this case.

As Nazarian once said; “These people who were involved in the killing of Mike Yepremyan are looking at a whole lotta of time, and the district attorney’s office is going to be sure they get all that they got coming to them and more, time is wonderful unless you are in a state prison.”

In a L. A. Times article today by Robert Faturechi;

“the indictment also named another member of the group, Lazar Petrosyan, who authorities said is being treated as a witness, not a suspect.

We will be verifying this as soon as possible, but my bet is because of the flight risk, Kat and her brother will be spending their first night in jail the first of many.

R.I.P. Mike and may your family be comforted by knowing they stayed the course and may sure you were remember both of your organ donations, but also they never tired, they saw your killers brought to justice.

As many of you know we have closed the forums here at Rose Speaks.com as we just did not have the time to do a good job moderating it for all of you. We are glad to announce that we have paired up with The Parenting Channel.com to carry a lead in to any of the cases we cover that has anything to do with a child or teen. We are ecstatic to have been able to do this. So lead in-ins for our blog articles will appear on The Parenting Channel’s blog and a section of The Parenting Channel forums has been set up on any trials we cover of children and/or teens. I encourage all of you to join both the blog and the forums, it is going to take off where Rose Speaks.com left off after the Anna Nicole Smith and Casey Anthony trials

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following. Be sure and “Like” The Parenting Channel Face Book page for the latest in parenting and grand parenting.

©Rose Turner
August 3, 2012
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: 19 year old Gombert Yepremyan, 19 year old Mike Yepremyan, 60 MINUTES, Alex Kessel, Alex Kessel Esq., alledged murderer, alledged murderer Vahag Jurian, alledged murderer Zareh Manjikian, Ani and Art Yepremyan, Ani Yepremyan, Anna Nicole Smith, Anthony Brooklier, Anthony Brooklier esq., Art Yepremyan, Artak and Arni Yepremyan, bail is 3 million or 8 million, Beverly Hills, Blake Foster, Boalt Hall School of Law, both in L.A. and Glendale, CBS 60 MINUTES, CHICKIES BAIL BONDS, client flew the coop, Connie Frances, conspiracy to commit murder Kat Vardanian, conspiracy to committ murder, Danielle Mike’s former girlfriend, Dateline, Dateline NBC, defendant Hovic Dzhuryan, defendent Hovic Dzhuryan, defendent Kat Vardanian, defense attorney Alex Kessel, defense attorney Anthony Brooklier, defense attorney George Mgdesyan, Desperateexes.com, Detective T. Townsend, Detective T. Townsend homicide cop, Detective Thomas Townsend, Detective Townsend and Lt. Hamilton’s team of homicide cops, Do you know a Mr. Nazarian, Follow John J Nazarian On Linked IN, for ‘Bro’ & ‘Sis’ ‘lets make a deal’, George Mgdesyan, George Mgdesyan Esq., Get me off the hook, Gombert Yepremyan, Gombert “Mike” Yepremyan, Google, Google John J Nazarian, Grand Jury Indicts Four in the Teen Text Murder, Harland Braun Esq., Harvard University, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Honorable Gregory A. Dohi, Hovic Dzhuryan, Hovik Dzhuryan, Jodie Foster, Jodie Foster’s father Blake Foster, John J Nazarian On Face Book, John J Nazarian On Twitter, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., John Nazarian, Judge Dohi admitted to California bar 1991, Judge Dohi is a professor at Southwestern School of Law, Judge Dohi was a prosecutor in L.A D.A. Office, Judge Gregory A. Dohi, Judge Gregory A. Dohi was appointed in August 2007, jurist in Southern California, Kat Vardanian, Kat Vardanyan, Khatun ‘Kat’ Vardanyan, L. A. Times, L.A.P.D. Homicide, lady justice may get a little sick at times but she never dies, Lazar Petrosyan, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Grand Jury, Los Angeles Grand Jury has indicted Hovik Dzhuryan, Los Angeles Grand Jury has indicted Khatun ‘Kat’ Vardanyan, Los Angeles Grand Jury has indicted Zareh Manjikian, Los Angeles Grand Jury Vahagn Jurian, Los Angeles Superior Court, Los Angeles Times, Lt. Hamilton, Luce Villareal, Luce Villareal taped a segment for Dateline, Michael Levin, Michael Levin criminal attorney, Michael Levin Esq., Mike Yepremyan, Mike Yepremyan was murdered November 2009, Mike Yepremyan’s parents, Mike ‘Gombert’ Yepremyan, Murder trial started in June 2012, NBC Dateline, North Hollywood, North Hollywood Division of the L.A.P.D. Homicide, November will be the two year anniversary of the murder of Mike ‘Gombert’ Yepremyan, O. J. Simpson, Officer Kirkpatrick, Robert Blake, Robert Faturechi, Rose Speaks, Rose Speaks Face Book, Rose Speaks Twitter, Straight Talk with John J Nazarian, subscribe to John J Nazarian on You Tube, teen text murder, Teen Text Murder of Mike ‘Gombert’ Yepremyan, Teen Text Murder Trial, Teen Text Murder Trial of Mike Yepremyan, The Parenting Channel blog, The Parenting Channel Commuity, The Parenting Channel on Face Book, The Parenting Channel.com, tough Armo, Vahag Jurian, Vahagn Jurian, victims Artak and Arni Yepremyan barred from courtroom at times, violation of victims rights, which MoFo shot and killed an innocent boy, Whose Sorry Now, Zareh Manjikian, ‘Armo’ slippers

As reported by John J Nazarian:

The Yepremyan murder trial is wrapping up after several weeks, it is the process that is also a real killer. Can you begin to imagine the Yepremyans sitting day in and day out within feet of those responsible for the murder of their only son. Having to sit and watch all of the evidence that at times was gruesome. There were photos of the autopsy, their boy laying there dead. And worse yet was the silly shit the defense attorneys would pull on witnesses, and the shenanigans (one would have to wonder what redeeming qualities lawyers like this have? What would it be like to have their son or daughter laying on a stainless steel table with a bullet hole in the head? Getting ready to be sliced and diced during an autopsy). Just me thinking our loud.

The defense attorneys have pulled out all the stops. Kessel was the most annoying in so much that he does his job and enjoys it. What job do you ask? Get the guilty out of the belly of the beast at all costs and this trial was no exception. Just like ‘OJ’ everyone knew Simpson killed his wife and the kid. And he was found not guilty by a gaggle of some of the dumbest human beings to ever walk the face of this planet…it all caught up with him in time (this was probably one of the rare examples of a “jury of your peers” ).

Likewise, everyone with any brains knows exactly what happened that night in North Hollywood, who killed Mike Yepremyan, who put it all into motion and all of the players. The truth has little or no place in a criminal court, it is defense games and police detectives and prosecutors who waltz around with the freedom of those in the jaws of the system. The jury system as I have often stated is a total joke for the most part, “a jury of your peers.” Really? So would I have 12 former cops on a jury, does a doctor get a jury of other doctors to decide ones innocence or guilt? Of course not, jury selection is a science for those who want to spend the money on professionals who can pick certain ‘candidates’ with certain characteristics that will be favorable for your client.

That was not the case in the Yepremyan murder case, Not Guilty or Guilty is not going to bring back Mike ‘Gombert’ Yepremyan from his grave in Forest Lawn. One big help for the defense was the fact all of Mikes ‘friends’ that night seemed to have forgotten and lied about a shotgun that was in the trunk of Mike’s car. For sure it was not put there by Mike, but by one of his friends who thought that his military career was going to be helpful in the event of something happening. In the end it may well have gave the defense a gift, sure a real big gift to the defendants. Sure, they all lied (Mike’s friends who all watched and did nothing) about an issue that if it had been told to the cops at the time would have been a non-issue. Having any long gun in your trunk is not an issue, tell the cops the truth and all would have been fine, but to lie? The whole bunch of you may have given rise to letting the killers off, we will see.

Worse yet was that this same group that were standing feet away when Mike was murdered also lied to the grand jury! WTF were you thinking guys, you never used the gun obviously, are you all that f’n ignorant? You soldier boy should have got it and used it at the fleeing murders who had just shot your best friend in the neck. But nooo, you and the others decided to try and lie and forget about a non-fucking issue. Congratulations, the whole bunch of you may very well be responsible for Mike Yepremyan and his Mom and Dad never seeing justice…all because you lied!

Now if the jury is smart and the prosecutor is as good an actor as some of the members of the defense team. This jury may well understand that they are sitting and looking at those responsible for the murder of Mike ‘Gombert’ Yepremyan. If these defendants are to be found not guilty, as I said when ‘OJ’ was found not guilty, the defendants took the risks, they played the game and payed dearly for a great defense team… this is after all our system of justice.

One other note, as many of you will recall in my earlier writings on Desperateexes.com I talk about the “Armenian Factor.” This “Factor” is as real as dead fish will stink, fruit will rot and for law enforcement the “Armenian Factor,” encompasses all of this and much more in investigating crimes involving this element.

As many of you know we have closed the forums here at Rose Speaks.com as we just did not have the time to do a good job moderating it for all of you. We are glad to announce that we have paired up with The Parenting Channel.com to carry a lead in to any of the cases we cover that has anything to do with a child or teen. We are ecstatic to have been able to do this. So lead in-ins for our blog articles will appear on The Parenting Channel’s blog and a section of The Parenting Channel forums has been set up on any trials we cover of children and/or teens. I encourage all of you to join both the blog and the forums, it is going to take off where Rose Speaks.com left off after the Anna Nicole Smith and Casey Anthony trials

Follow John J Nazarian On Face Book and on Twitter; follow John and see who John J Nazarian is following. Most Important subscribe to John J Nazarian on You Tube, see John Unleashed on the latest stories of today.

©Straight Talk with John J. Nazarian, Private Investigator
August 2, 2012
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: 19 year old Gombert Yepremyan, 19 year old Mike Yepremyan, Alex Kessel, Alex Kessel Esq., alledged murderer, alledged murderer Vahag Jurian, alledged murderer Zareh Manjikian, Ani Yepremyan, Anthony Brooklier, Anthony Brooklier esq., Art Yepremyan, Artak and Arni Yepremyan, Beverly Hills, Blake Foster, conspiracy to commit murder Kat Vardanian, conspiracy to committ murder, Danielle Mike’s former girlfriend, Dateline, defendant Hovic Dzhuryan, defendent Hovic Dzhuryan, defendent Kat Vardanian, defense attorney Alex Kessel, defense attorney Anthony Brooklier, defense attorney George Mgdesyan, Desperateexes.com, Detective Thomas Townsend, Follow John J Nazarian On Linked IN, George Mgdesyan, George Mgdesyan Esq., Gombert Yepremyan, Gombert “Mike” Yepremyan, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Honorable Gregory A. Dohi, Hovic Dzhuryan, John J Nazarian On Face Book, John J Nazarian On Twitter, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., John Nazarian, Judge Dohi admitted to California bar 1991, Judge Dohi is a professor at Southwestern School of Law, Judge Dohi was a prosecutor in L.A D.A. Office, Judge Gregory A. Dohi, Judge Gregory A. Dohi was appointed in August 2007, Kat Vardanian, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court, Michael Levin, Michael Levin criminal attorney, Michael Levin Esq., Mike Yepremyan, Mike Yepremyan was murdered November 2009, Mike Yepremyan’s parents, Murder trial started in June 2012, O. J. Simpson, Rose Speaks Face Book, Rose Speaks Twitter, Straight Talk with John J Nazarian, subscribe to John J Nazarian on You Tube, teen text murder, Teen Text Murder Trial, Teen Text Murder Trial of Mike Yepremyan, The Parenting Channel blog, The Parenting Channel Commuity, The Parenting Channel on Face Book, The Parenting Channel.com, Vahag Jurian, violation of victims rights, Zareh Manjikian

Straight Talk with Celebrity P. I. John J. Nazarian’s guests tonight at 7 PM PST – 10 PM PST are retired homicide detectives and partners for the L.A.P.D., Robert A.”Bob” Jakucs and William “Bill” Cox.

Robert Jakucs and William Cox will be discussing two or three top cases they worked as partners while at the L. A. P. D. as homicide detectives that have been totally adjudicated.

John Nazarian with Robert Jakucs and William Cox worked on some cases in the world of a celebrity P. I. in Hollywood, Bob and Bill will discuss the meticulous job John did with two of his favorite go to guys on his cases, what were the cases, and how did they remain friends after working with John.

If there is time they will also talk about congress not working out a budget in the “super committee” which then pushed the have to button that the defense department had to make deep cuts; and now to go forward President Obama’s decision to save the boots on the ground and cutting some of the U. S. Marine Corps troops and spending the money on drones in the future for the protection from war for the U. S. and as a first strike and like have been used to get Osama Bin Laden and keeping Gaddafi pinned down in Libya.

Robert Jakucs

Robert A. Jakucs – Retired Det. L.A.P.D
Robert A. Jakucs is a retired Los Angeles Police Department Detective with over 30-years of investigative experience. During his distinguished career with the L.A.P.D he worked such high-profile assignments as Homicide, Hollywood Vice, SWAT, Robberies, Burglaries, Complex Thefts, and gang-related shootings. He was a member of the Night Stalker Task Force that investigated the serial murderer Richard Ramirez. Robert Jakucs is also a consultant for national television specializing in private and police investigation issues and has appeared on the news shows Nightline, 20/20 and Inside Edition.

William Cox was a Los Angeles Police Detective who retired in 2007 after 32 years
William Cox worked in a variety of assignments including uniformed patrol, CRASH (gang detail) in South-Central and West Los Angeles areas. He also worked homicides for over 20 years and finished his career in Robbery-Homicide Division (RHD) which handles major cases including serial killers, multiple murders, media and high-profile cases, officer-involved shootings, and assaults and murders on police officers. He also worked the Rampart Corruption Task Force for two years. William Cox was also involved or handled several high-profile cases over the years including the Kimes (mother-son grifters who were responsible for 3 murders in LA, NY, and the Bahamas); the Goetz of the West case; the murder of the pregnant mother at LAX; plus several others.

William Cox has appeared on Investigative Discovery channel, 48 Hours, and E-entertainment. He is currently employed by the US State Dept. as a background investigator.

William Cox’s last case he worked on at RHD was a Chinese immigrant student attending USC who had gone to a frat party and had attempted to pull a gun and start shooting students. He was wrestled to the ground by other students who then called police. After a search warrant was served on the suspect’s apartment Cox and three other detectives were sent to NY City to investigate and attempt to identify approximately 20 persons he had targeted to possibly kill. (This incident occurred shortly after the mass murders at West Virginia Tech.) Cox was also working on a murder where a husband set his car and wife on fire on the Golden State Frwy. Cox had also been working (for the past four years) on a double homicide that had occurred in 2002 wherein two victims were killed in their car and their car set on fire. That murder was the story that 48 Hours has done and shown on television in February 2011.

Comment telephone lines are always open to call in throughout the one hour show at 818-572-8030 (long distance charges do apply). We encourage you join in the discussion. or ask John and his guests any questions you have.

Follow John J Nazarian On Face Book and on Twitter and see who John J Nazarian is following.

PR Release:
©Straight Talk with John J. Nazarian
January 15, 2012
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of this site.

Tags: 20/20, 48 Hours, 818-572-8030, a double homicide that had occurred in 2002 wherein two victims were killed in their car and their car set on fire, Adam Braun, Anna Nicole Smith, Anthony Pelicanno, Beverly Hills, Blog Talk Radio, Bob Jakucs, Burglaries, Celebrities, celebrity P. I. in Hollywood, Celebrity Trials, Complex Thefts, Cox and three other detectives were sent to NY City to investigate and attempt to identify approximately 20 persons he had targeted to possibly kill, CRASH (gang detail) in South-Central and West Los Angeles areas, E-entertainment, Gaddafi, Gaddafi pinned down in Libya, gang-related shootings, Goetz of the West case, guests on HLN, High Profile Trials, Hollywood, Hollywood Vice, Homicide, Inside Edition, Investigative Discovery channel, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., John Nazarian, Kimes mother-son grifters, Kimes mother-son grifters who were responsible for 3 murders in LA NY the Bahamas, Libya, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, mass murders at West Virginia Tech., murder of the pregnant mother at LAX, murder was the story that 48 Hours has done and shown on television in February 2011, murder where a husband set his car and wife on fire on the Golden State Frwy, national television specializing in private and police investigation issues, Night Stalker Task Force, Nightline, O. J. Simpson, on one of Blog Talk Radio's fastest growing shows, Osama Bin Laden, panel includes the nation's select legal experts, President Obama, Rampart Corruption Task Force, retired homicide detectives and bloggers, RHD was a Chinese immigrant student attending USC who had gone to a frat party and had attempted to pull a gun and start shooting students, Richard Ramirez, Robberies, Robert A. Jakucs, Robert A. Jakucs - Retired Det. L.A.P.D, serial murderer Richard Ramirez, Skpye to call in including international callers, Straight Talk with John J Nazarian, SWAT, U. S. Marine Corps, uniformed patrol, US State Dept. as a background investigator, William Cox, worked homicides for over 20 years

Remember Judge Ito in the O. J. Simpson trial? Do you remember that Judge Ito accommodated the D. A. over and over until we came to the gloves if “If they don’t fit you must acquit”. I have wondered if that might be the case in the cans of odor, what if those are opened for the jury and there is no smell?

Now this morning we find that Arpad Vass, PhD, Oak Ridge, (The body farm research facility), on the stand all day yesterday had via trusting the D. A. identified the WRONG can. Not to mention that the body farm is a research facility NOT a forensic laboratory, thus they don’t follow the strict protocol that is in required in criminal cases. This evidence has never been allowed in any court, state or federal since the research facility since it’s creation in 1981. The question is why?

The FBI witness on the one band of hair had a death band on it, again many consider that “junk science”; why? Because it is not reliable and recent studies have confirmed that as late as 2010. I agree there is a first time for any new technique, like DNA to be allowed in court. But in the Casey Anthony case why are we getting so much of never introduced techniques? I mean really the FBI does not even use the hair analysis in federal court and they pay for that research. The body firm is RESEARCH, like going out with a divining rod, made out of a coat hanger to hunt for dead bodies among other new techniques or would that be old techniques.

Why does the D. A. need these many unproven, uncontrolled in chain of evidence new “science” in this case? One might argue they decided Casey Anthony was guilty and have then recreated the evidence to prove that. Nothing wrong with that unless as some believe this was an accident then covered up and not premeditated murder. If the D. A. had DNA, and/or other hard and fast evidence we would not have to take this trip through old science that other courts have found not reliable. If Texas the king of death penalty cases, does not take it and no other state takes it after 20 years, why is there so much of it in one case? I can see one new science introduced, but all of this new “science”, it might be “overkill”, and if so could backfire in my opinion.

What are your thoughts, why are we taking infotainment as the gospel on this case every night; well not here in our home but Nancy Grace’s show has shot off of the charts because she creates the perfect environment of hate and prejudice. Let’s don’t even get into Geraldo Rivera who has been there every day.

What are your thoughts in the area of junk science? Can someone tell me who went back and got the garbage at the tow yard and how did that prove up that chain of evidence? I am worried about our legal system when almost everyone in the U. S. has had access to so many document dumps by any state in what appears to me to be a clear cut attempt to not only tamper a jury pool but to make Casey Anthony the most hated mother in our country.

In case you don’t have it, here is the State’s witness list and when they were added and what they are going to testify about. Florida State Witness List in Florida vs. Casey Anthony (1514)

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl runs that entire section don’t hesitate to contact her to make suggestions on how this forum is more user friendly.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
June 7, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Ann Finnell, Ann Finnell Esq., Arpad Vass, Body Farm Tennessee, Casey Anthony, Casey Anthony Murder Trial, Caylee Anthony, Cheney Mason, Cheney Mason Esq., Chief Judge Belvin Perry Jr., Cindy Anthony, Day 12 Casey Anthony Trial, Dorothy Simms, Dorothy Simms Esq., Dr. Arpad Vass, First Degree Murder trial Casey Anthony, Florida Appellate Opinions, Frank George., Frank George.Esq., Fusion Restaurant and Bar, George Anthony, High Profile Trials, Ineffectiveness Assistance, Ineffectiveness Assistance of Jose Baez, Jeff Ashton, Jeff Ashton Esq., Jose Baez, Jose Baez Esq., Judge Belvin Perry, Judge Belvin Perry Jr., Judge Blevin Perry, Judge Perry, Judge Tito, Lee Anthony, Linda Burdick, Linda Burdick Esq., O. J. Simpson, Oak Ridge Research Facility, OCSO, Orange County Florida, Orange County Superior Court, Orange County Superior Court Chief Judge Belvin Perry Jr., Orlanda Florida, Orlanda Florida Criminal Defense Laywer Richard Hornsby, Orlando, Orlando Florida, prosecutor Frank George, prosecutor Jeff Ashton, prosecutor Linda Burdick, Rose Speaks Face Book, Rose Speaks Twitter, Sparkman and the Tape, Sparkman v. State

As I have read through the 39 page transcript of the criminal hearing from January 6, 2011, I notice several things I will comment on and ask you what are your thoughts to Judge Perry in this hearing? I will then close this chapter of the saga with some personal thoughts.

On the hearing on January 6, 2011 the appearances in front of Judge Robert L. Perry were:

THE STATE OF California. Renee Rose, Sean Carney, & David Barkhurst Deputy District Attorneys for Los Angeles County..

Bradley Brunon attorney at law and his client defendant Dr. Khristine Eroshevich

Steven Sadow & Christopher Smith with their client defendant Howard K. Stern.

Judge Robert Perry first outlined the charges brought by the prosecution, summarized those charges as follows: “The District Attorney brought an extremely complex criminal prosecution in this matter involving three conspiracy counts and eight substantive counts against three Defendants which allege criminal acts over a period of approximately three years. The theory of the case was that the defendants wrongfully obtained excessive quantities of prescription drugs for Anna Nicole Smith, who was alleged to be addicted to said drugs. The charges involved allegations of furnishing statutes and violations of obtaining prescriptions by fraud or in false names. The three defendants collectively faced a potential of 23 guilty verdicts. The jury returned six guilty verdicts, four against Eroshevich, two against Howard stern. Dr. Kapoor, the lead defendant, was acquitted on all counts.

In the next part Judge Robert Perry gives us a rundown of the charges the Jury either found not guilty or found Howard K. Stern and Dr. Eroshevich on with first a statement that in the Court’s opinion “It is the court’s view that the verdict was a stunning repudiation of the prosecution’s case.”

Mr. Stern was acquitted on all eight substantive counts. Stern and Eroshevich were convicted of two conspiracies, count 1, a conspiracy alleged to have commenced on September 11th of 2006, that continued until Ms. Smith’s death on — in February of 2007. Count 3, which was alleged to have commenced on June 5th of 2004, which continued until September 10th of 2006, the day before the count conspiracy was alleged to have commenced. Regarding the conspiracies, the jury found that Stern and Eroshevich CONSPIRED to commit two target crimes: One, to obtain a controlled substance by fraud in VIOLATION of Health and Safety Code section 11173(a), and a second target crime to unlawfully give a false name in a prescription for a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11174. Eroshevich was also convicted of two substantive Counts, Counts 7 and 9. Count 7 pertained to the charge of obtaining a controlled substance by fraud in violation of 11173(a) of the Health and Safety Code. Count 9 charged a violation of giving a false name in a prescription for a controlled substance in violation of 15 11174. Both counts involved a single prescription for Hydrocodone, otherwise known as vicodin, written on November 24th, 2006, by Eroshevich in the name Charlene Underwood.

Judge Perry then gives us the breakdown on the charges the jury deadlocked on and what the vote was by the jury:

“The jury also hung in a split of 6 to 6 for Eroshevich on counts 5 and involving the same event, the prescription for Charlene Underwood. Count 5 charged a violation of unlawfully prescribing a controlled substance, in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11153(a). Count 11 charged a crime of unlawfully prescribing a controlled substance to an addict in VIOLATION of 11156. In addition, the jury deadlocked on certain target crimes alleged in the conspiracies in Counts 1 and 3. The jury hung 5 to 7, 5 would be in favor of guilt, in favor of acquittal, for the target crime of unlawfully prescribing, administering, or dispensing a controlled substance to an addict. As to Count 1, that would be a violation of Health and Safety Code Section 11156, the jury hung 10 to 2 in favor of conviction for the target crimes on Count 1 of unlawfully prescribing a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11153, and excessively prescribing or administering drugs in violation of business and profession code section 725(a). As to the Count 3 conspiracy, the jury found not true that the Defendants conspired to prescribe drugs to an addict in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11156. They — the jury found, or held rather – rather hung 7 to 5 for the unlawful prescribing of a controlled substance, 11153(a), and unlawfully prescribing a controlled substance to a person not under a physician’s treatment for a pathology other than addiction to a controlled substance, a violation of Health and Safety Code Section 11154(A) and (B). The jury also found — or hung 5 to 7 in favor of acquittal for the target crime on Count 3 of excessively prescribing or administering drugs in violation of business and profession code section 24 725(a).“

“The court must view the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution. I have concerns about the conspiracy counts, in particular as to Mr. Stern and whether there is specific intent in the evidence to show that he had a specific intent to violate the two target crimes of which he stands convicted in both counts.” At this part of the hearing Judge Perry asked Steve Sadow to address those issues and what the evidence presented at trial.

I like the part that Sadow thanked the AP reporter and quoting from an article that appeared on January 6, 2011 saying: “I have to give due credit to the esteemed and honorable reporter Ms. Deutch for her article today. I don’t know if the Court saw it. But she found a quote that your Honor — a statement your Honor had made — and thank you, Linda. And that’s Howard K. Stern. What the evidence in this case showed is that he and Dr. Eroshevich had an agreement that prescriptions for Anna Nicole would be written in Howard’s name, and that’s all the evidence shows. There is no evidence that Howard knew of any other name, not Ben Stern, not Charlene Underwood, not any other name. He didn’t pick them up, he didn’t have anything to do with obtaining them. There was never a witness who connected any of those names to him or brought to South — to the Keys. That’s what we have.”

Steve Sadow went on to say; “We all had either the fortune or misfortune to sit through two and a half months of facts. The Court instructed the jury, and did so because all of the parties agreed, that if a defendant had a good faith belief that his or her actions were legal, he or she is not guilty of conspiracy. And I really think that’s the crux of where we are because if you look at the evidence in any light, the evidence does not show that Howard K. Stern specifically intended to break the law insofar as these two target offenses, and that he, in fact, had a good faith belief that his actions were legal.”

One of the strongest arguments I think Sadow brought to the Court’s attention is that Howard K. Stern was honest about using his name to Danny Santiago stating: “And based on the evidence here, there is not a single indication that Mr. Stern believed it was illegal to do so and didn’t have a good faith belief that it was okay. They’ve been doing it for Anna since 2000 in Michelle Chase, in Jane brown. They went on and continued to do it in the Bahamas the same way. Howard knew it was going to Anna. Dr. Eroshevich knew it was going to Anna. There was never any question about that. When agent Santiago goes to see Mr. Stern on October the 12th, in a non-custodial setting, Mr. Stern says, Absolutely, it was in my name. It was written for privacy. There wasn’t any question about it. Now, that’s not evidence of a guilty intent. That’s evidence of someone who believes that what he did was legal.”

Judge Perry brought up the question about that pesky black bag stating; “Well, the argument was made that because Mr. Stern had a bag of prescription medication that ended up in the hotel room, that that was some indication of knowledge.” To which Mr. Sadow countered with; “All his name. All Howard K. Stern’s name. Not one other name was in that bag, and that was the beginning of the trial. So we — you know, we have always acknowledged, always admitted, Howard has always done so, he knew they were being written in his name. The question is, did he specifically intend to break the law? Did he know it was illegal to do so? And I’m suggesting that the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to have convicted on that.”

Judge Perry then turned to Dr. Eroshevich’s attorney Bradley Brunon and asked: “If the evidence fails to support Stern’s involvement in a conspiracy, is it your view that the conspiracy charge against Dr. Eroshevich would fall?” To which Brunon responded in part that; “Yes, your Honor. There would have to be mutuality of intent in the conspiracy and it takes at least two people. And if one of them isn’t criminally culpable, then the other one, I would say, couldn’t be just as a matter of law.”

At this point Mr. Brunon brought up “the elephant in the room” throughout the trial saying: “There’s the additional problem that the Court very clearly, very forcefully and very early in the trial said, we’re not going to litigate Ms. Smith’s Death. And yet, it became kind of a subtle thing, a light motif. We started off very early on with the toxicologist talking about the drugs found in her body at autopsy, obviously a postmortem event. That was followed by Birkhead and others concerning about the ultimate outcome to her health in taking these medications. So it became kind of the elephant in the room.” He further brought up the millions of dollars at stake stating: “[T]hat Mr. stern was trying to drug her into a tractable state where he could make way with Marshal millions, that turned out not to be the case.”

The fact of being a celebrity was addressed by Brunon in stating; “the Journal carried a rather extensive article about the medical data leaks from institutions and doctors that go beyond celebrities to expose thousands, and I think I can cite this simply for the fact that it’s common knowledge — we talked about it during the course of the trial — that celebrities seem to be fair game to anyone that thinks they can make some money off of exposing some secret in their life.” Following this was this exchange with Judge Perry and Brunon:

“THE COURT: I remember the issue involving Farrah Fawcett and her admission at UCLA. and how people were all over themselves trying to find out what she was there for and getting copies of her records.

Mr. BRUNON: And the woman was in terminal condition, and yet someone profited by it.”

It appears that Bunon hints that a medical malpractice suit would have been more appropriate then a criminal trial when he said; “I alluded in my pleadings to the issue that kind of malpractice crept into this, Dr. Eroshevich didn’t practice psychiatry correctly; therefore, she’s guilty of writing bad prescriptions. It had some relevance, but not the relevancy that it was given. I mean, Dr. Botello physically shuddered when he had to consider the photo of Dr. Eroshevich and Ms. Smith in the bathtub … It really wasn’t an issue in the case. In the case — the forgery case”

After the Deputy District Attorney Sean Carney responded the Court said in part: “I did a little review of the schedule of prescriptions. And I looked at it with the idea of finding what the evidence was as to prescriptions that Howard Stern had allegedly picked up that were prescribed by Eroshevich. And I found in my review, and I think that’s what the evidence supports, that stern picked up prescriptions that Eroshevich had issued for Vickie Marshal. There were a number, maybe eight or nine. I can give you the dates if it’s necessary. That he picked up one prescription for Ambien for Anna smith, and then he picked up on four occasions prescriptions in the name Howard Stern.” Then Judge Perry went on to comment on what good pleadings Carney had written saying: “I thought you were correct in your pleading — of course, I think you do excellent pleading work — in that you thought it was a slightly higher standard for the court on its own motion to dismiss.”

Of course the retrying of the hung charges and that either side could appeal came up.

Judge Perry issued his verbal ruling in a thoughtful and precise way that I believe will hold up under any appeal with a multi-page decision. At the end to this detail explanation Judge Perry stated; “Let me make clear that I am dismissing on my own motion in furtherance of justice counts 1 and 2 (corrected to 3) in this case as to all target crimes finding the evidence insufficient. I think that that needed to be said. All right.”

The only thing left was if the D. A. was going to retry Khristine Eroshevich on the counts that there was a hung jury with the D. A. is to let Judge Perry know in writing and that they had sixty days to file a notice and appeal on Judge Perry’s decision.

I am sure one of you has the charging document, [juries written decisions on all charges], or if not perhaps we can find one. I remember reading it right after the trial in October 2010.

I have been reading and talking to some of you about feeling sorry for Howard K. Stern losing four years of his life here. True, but that said, Stern made a conscious decision to enter into the chaos that appears Anna Nicole Smith’s life which entangled all who came to care for her.

I could whine about the three plus years of my life gone and the fact that 90% of the internet including members of Rose Speaks.com turned against me for not being willing to go to jail. I chose not to because simply there was nothing to hide, and unlike other co-defendants I did not have a robbery or had my hard drive in a bank box. They did not lie about what happened to them, but I did have my emails and hard drives. I simply knew that the truth would prevail that many had great lawyers in this and that I just had to batten down the hatches for however long this storm lasted. I chose to enter the chaos of having a blog that covered “All Things Anna Nicole Smith” so I did throw myself into the peripheral chaos by not closing this site and/or not stopping coverage of this horrible ongoing saga.

Who does my heart ache for and will for a very long time? First two moderators of Rose Speaks.com who did nothing and yet ended up in jail on ridiculous contempt charges. Recordings came out during the discovery that had one “witness” taped by a lawyer in two phone calls about putting Lyndal Harrington in jail, anything to get to me for this person’s own personal vendetta. She was willing to take down Bonnie Stern, Lyndal Harrington and Teresa Stephens if the lawyers promised that I would be brought down. What kind of sick person does that? As I told the lawyer I could only listen to one of the two tape phone calls but that my phone records as well as the time line would prove I never was the “brains” behind robberies, hiding of hard drives and filing a bankruptcy even suggesting that I had that kind of power over others is ludicrous. My prayer is that Karma is a bitch and you know who you are. Hint, it happened in the spring of 2009. So it was NOT QV or Havana or any of the people you might think it was. The complete ability to hate so much that you are willing to sacrifice three people you knew were innocent, to get to someone you just wanted to destroy is unconscionadle. Someone you never met and did nothing to you but try to be a support system during what you said, and now I believe was no more than a made up crises. I don’t think I even want to get in the head of someone like that to see the darkness there.

Besides those two moderators my heart bleeds for Howard K. Stern’s parents, Leon and Bea Stern. They sent their son, the baby of the family, to obtain a top notch education and secured his earning ability only to have him end up with one client. They had nothing to say about the chaos surrounding Anna Nicole Smith flooding into their lives and upon her death to cause what must have been a living hell for them for the next four years. These were just parents, who loved their son and stood by him. Any of us as parents would do the same thing. They had no control over what their lives became and due to their age, I am sure the price emotionally and physically is one none of us can even begin to imagine.

So my tears will be for the two moderators that went to jail and for Howard’s parents, those four people did not deserve to find themselves in the midst of this as none of us should have been entangled. This should have been a simple three hour hearing and court decision where Anna Nicole Smith wanted and intended to be buried not four years of hell.

I will not be saying anything else about anything connected to Anna Nicole Smith except for the Supreme Court hearing and the South Carolina trial; and of course if California is willing to throw more money with what seems to me to be idiocy any Appeal in criminal court they file. I will be updating the download page with all of the paperwork pending before the Supreme Court in the next few days for reference reading for all of you.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

©Rose Turner
January 11, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Adam Braun Esq., Anna Nicole Show, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith's Will, Anna Nicole Smith's Will and Estate, AP interview, Bahamas, bestseller., Beverly Hills, Brad Brunon, Brad Brunon Esq., Bradley Brunon, Bradley Brunon Esq., Britney Spears, Bruce Ross Esq., California Medical Board, Cedars Sinai, Celebrity Trials, Dale Tate, Dannielynn, David Barkhurst, Defense attorney Chris Smith, Deputy District Attorney David Barkhurst, Deputy District Attorney David Walgren, Deputy District Attorney Rene Rose, Deputy District Attorney Renee Rose, Desperateexes.com, Dr. Conrad Murray, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, E Online!, Edward M. Chernoff Esq., Ellyn Garofalo Esq., Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., Estate of Anna Nicole smith, flamboyant fruit cake, Harland Braun criminal lawyer, Harland Braun Esq., High Profile Trials, Hollyweird, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollyweird Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, investigative agencies, J. Chris Smith Esq., J. Christopher Smith Esq., J. Christopher “Chris” Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Judge Perry, Judge Perry California Superior Court, Judge Robert L. Perry, Judge Robert Perry, Judge Robert Perry OJ Simpson, Linda Deutsch, Los Angeles District Attorney, Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson, misdemeanor with probation, Neil McCabe, Nicole White, O. J. Simpson, OJ Simpson’s Trial, Prosecutor Rene Rose, pseudonym is a felony, pseudonym names, Radar Online, Rene Rose Esq., Renee Rose, Ron Rale Esq., Sean Carney, State Bar of California, Steve Cooley, Steve Cooley Esq., Steve Sadow Esq., Superior Court Judge Robert J. Perry, Superior Court Judge Robert Perry, the Sadow Factor, the “real” Anna Nicole Smith, UCLA Medical Center, Virgie Arthur

Many times I’ve stated, the real truth of the Anna Nicole Smith case will never be told, at least in a court of law. Howard K. Stern had his entire case thrown out by superior court Judge Robert Perry, this judge made it clear from the very beginning he did not like this case. And in the end he made it even clearer by taking the action that he did.

Dr. Khristine Eroshevich also escaped with her title intact – Doctor – …Dr. Eroshevich and I were to write a book of the “real” Anna Nicole Smith and the shenanigans that were being pulled on and around her. There is still not a question in my mind having discussed this in detail with Eroshevich that it would be “her” telling the story of what she saw that would be a bestseller.

Again as I stated previously, the D.A.’s office did not expect to have to deal with Steve Sadow and what I called the “Sadow Factor.” …

[Three defendants Dr. Kapoor, Dr. Eroshevich and Howard K. Stern], Their reputations will be forever in question, just as was O.J. Simpson, most thought he was guilty of the crimes he was charged with…the difference was that the jury set him free and in this case it was Judge Perry …The Judge saw through what was being done and did not like it, and I agree. I agree with the law as this is what our country is based on. My problem is all those conversations I had with Eroshevich and all the discovery that I read, and every lie has a little truth.

Let me put it this way, what the Los Angeles District Attorney did was try to bake a cake. Yes, try and bake a cake when you had no flour and the eggs were rotten…. …And stink it did, this has to be one of the biggest stinkers the L.A. District Attorney has had to face during Steve Cooley’s time in office…

…Having a judge who is annoyed with the case as charged and who would become even more annoyed at Prosecutor Rene Rose who was prosecuting the case was another element. There was the Sadow Factor and the other element was surrounding yourself (Howard and Anna) with people who at their best were incompetent. We saw the body guard, the wife of the body guard, the nannies (and their families), star-struck government officials, real estate moguls/felons and a galaxy of hangers-on, and it would be their very testimony that would be almost as comical as an episode of the “Anna Nicole Show”…the only thing missing was that flamboyant fruit cake. It was this very, very incompetent and annoying testimony that further pissed off Judge Perry.

…You would have thought he, [Kapoor] would have avoided the Criminal Courts Building at all costs – ahhh, the cameras (I certainly can relate to that). And we should all be happy for them, much of this was a mistake from the beginning on the part of the investigative agencies who participated. From the Bahamas to the United States, it was clowns with badges and guns…

To read the rest of this article visit Desperate Exes.com, and while there read John J. Nazarian’s take on DIVORCE Hollywood style as well as other cases he writes about

http://desperateexes.com/2011/01/08/judge-perry-boots-the-stooges-free/.

©John J. Nazarian
January 9, 2011
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Show, Anna Nicole Smith, Bahamas, bestseller., Beverly Hills, Brad Brunon Esq., Celebrity Trials, Dannielynn, Deputy District Attorney Rene Rose, Desperateexes.com, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, flamboyant fruit cake, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollyweird Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, investigative agencies, J. Chris Smith Esq., J. Christopher Smith Esq., J. Christopher “Chris” Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Judge Perry, Judge Perry California Superior Court, Judge Robert Perry OJ Simpson, Los Angeles District Attorney, O. J. Simpson, OJ Simpson’s Trial, Prosecutor Rene Rose, Rene Rose Esq., Steve Cooley, Steve Cooley Esq., Steve Sadow Esq., the Sadow Factor, the “real” Anna Nicole Smith

Forty years already, were does the time go? For me as with so many, the late 60’s and early 70’s were a time of turmoil. I was in the process of getting kicked out of my home in Boston by the original wicked stepmother, aka Marian Badasher Nazarian, “a woman that my father slept with.” My adoptive mother Cecelia F. Nazarian died March 26, 1963, I was ten. “Dad” was lonely I guess and met this who%&! as a passenger on one of his ships. “Daddy” married her in 1966. And it wasn’t long before she managed to unload me thanks to her hard work convincing my father I was a “bad kid” (this “bad kid” grew up to be a cop and all these years later I can now look back and see what Marian conspired to do). I was on my way to a dry desolate little place called Saugus, California. Back in those days there was nothing much in Saugus, California and it was hot and it was dry and this was where my sister and her family lived, and it was were I was going to be living for a very long time. This would turn out to be some of the best times of my life….the 70’s.

Well as time went on I became friends with Deputies from the old Newhall Station on San Fernando Road and for me coming from a suburb of Boston this was like visiting a western movie set. I remember the Manson murder case and I also remembered very vividly a man called Vincent Bugliosi…Vincent was the prosecutor who became famous on so many levels in sending many of the Manson Family to state prison. We all watched in fascination on television those horrific events. Vincent had a powerful presence in those days and later in my life he would still have it. A few years ago I interviewed Vincent Bugliosi for the O.J.Simpson story I did for Discovery Channel and I was very impressed with his still very strong presence and energy, he is sharp as ever and opinionated and interesting to speak with. This was a man that I had watched as a teenager on TV and now I was at his house, in his living room, reflecting on a very large part of his career. That large part was Charlie Manson and the three girls, all vicious killers, though Charlie always stated that he killed no one….

My early entry into law enforcement was as a prison guard at CIW, California Institute for Women in Frontera. Not a question in my mind that the time spent with the California Dept. of Corrections was one of my best learning experiences. Go figure, and as time went on I was introduced to all the famous female killers and others who had achieved an interesting level of fame — bank robbers, child killers, drug dealers and “Queens of Fraud.” I had them all for 8 to 16 hours a day, and little did I know that when I took my initial physical at the prison hospital it was an inmate handling part of my “intake” as a California State Prison guard…looking back on that experience it was strange but hey, I did not care, I needed a job. My first few days I had to remind myself that these inmates were all “female” no matter how masculine they appeared or the roles they play while incarcerated.

As a Prison Guard at C.I.W. I had a great deal of interaction with Patricia Krenwinkel, Leslie Van Houten and of course the infamous Susan Atkins. These girls were celebrities in the prison system, and at one time were housed in the specialty housing unit aka Death Row. Till “the girls” arrival there was not a Death Row at C.I.W. Death Row, C.I.W. style, was built of brick and cement with the intent of holding the “Manson Girls.” In time “the girls” would be released to General Population aka, GP, once the death penalty in California was no more. Surviving this was an achievement for the three convicted murderers, as for one of the other inmates to kill them would have given that inmate a certain level of jailhouse fame…these three girls were very smart inmates. They got their educations and became mouthpieces for others, as they could get instant access to the administration. I always found them interesting, Susan was very friendly and I would be selected to handle her wedding, and to take a picture with her and her new and very short-term husband Don Laisure (he was a huckster and a con) and Captain Brueske. That picture was worth more than $10,000 during those days but I kept it. Over time I acquired many photos of the girls and even a lock-up order for Ms. Van Houten, as it was I that was placed in charge of locking her up for a period of time.

To read the rest of the article and to see John J. Nazarian as he was forty years ago be sure NOT to miss this article.

http://desperateexes.com/2009/08/14/my-life-with-the-manson-girls/.

Just because it would be fun, here is Charles Mansion then and now, so as a contest as your read Mr. Nazarian’s article, tell which one you think he is in the pictures including the one he graciously allowed us to use with this article.

© John J. Nazarian, Former State Prison Guard at C.I.W.
August 14, 2009
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: C.I.W Prison California, California, California death penalty, California death penalty - The Mansion Family, California Dept. of Corrections, California Institute for Women in Frontera, California State Prison guard, Captain Brueske, Charlie Manson and the three girls, CIW, CIW Prison - Sylvia J. Johnson, CIW Supt. Sylvia J. Johnson, Death Row - C.I.W. style, Desperateexes.com, Discovery Channel, Discovery Channel - John J. Nazarian, Don Laisure, Former State Prison Guard at C.I.W, Helter Skelter, High Profile Trials, jail within a prison, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Leslie Van Houten, Leslie Van Houten - Charles Mansion, Lt. Carol Brueske, Newhall Station on San Fernando Road, O. J. Simpson, Officer Bertha Gonzalez, Officer Sonny White, Patricia Krenwinkel, Patricia Krenwinkel - Charles Mansion, Riverside General Hospital California, Riverside General Hospital to a State Prison, Saugus, Sharon Tate, Sharon Tate Murder, Sharon Tate Murder Case, Susan Atkins, Susan Atkins - Charles Mansion, Susan Atkins - Don Laisure, Susan Atkins dying, Susan Atkins Jail House wedding, Sylvia J. Johnson, The Mansion family murder trial, The Mansion family murders, The Mansion Girls, The Manson Family, Vincent Bugliosi