Yesterday, December 7, 2009, in the federal court for South Carolina, the Estate for Anna Nicole Smith filed additional documents of why attorney Susan M. Brown should be held in contempt of court, be sanction and added to the suit.

This is the case people I can’t write any opinions of a professional person image in Georgia, however the Estate’s filings say in much more detail then I could express.

So here or the papers without further comment:

December 7, 2009, G. Ben Thompson Request to be Join with the answer filed by Susan M. Brown in Response to the Motion of Contempt and Sanctions.

December 7, 2009 Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Contempt and Sanctions as it concerns Susan M. Brown.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit B filed with the Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Contempt and Sanctions as it concerns Susan M. Brown.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit C filed with the Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Contempt and Sanctions as it concerns Susan M. Brown.

December 7, 2009 Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate’s Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint; and for the Joiner of Additional Defendants as it concerns Susan M. Brown, attorney, and the Law Office of Susan M. Brown, P. C. to the federal court suit in South Carolina. This contains the belief of Smith’s Estate as to the wrong doing by Brown and how she waived the attorney client privilege as ruled by the North District of Georgia in its ruling regarding Brown’s Motion to Quash Subpoena.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit A Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate’s Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit B Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate’s Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit C Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate’s Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint.

December 7, 2009 Exhibit D Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate’s Reply in Support of the Executor’s, [Howard K. Stern], Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint.

©Rose Turner
December 8, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith's Estate, Anna Nicole Smith's Estate Executor, Celebrity Trials, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Federal Court South Carolina, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, Howard K. Stern esq., Howard K. Stern Executor, L. Lin Wood, Law Offices of Susan M. Brwon P. C., Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, North District of Georgia federal court, Rita Cosby, Susan M. Brown, Susan M. Brown Esq., Susan M. Brown Georgia Attorney, Susan M. Brown PC, The O'Quinn Law Firm