Posts Tagged “Nathan Collins”

Daniel DiCriscio Patrik Simpson and Pol' Atteu

“Bow wow wow, here come the dogs” is a line from a Pretender’s song, “Jealous Dogs” that comes to mind with this latest “low blow” done to me. If it were to be a joke, well no one told me.

Well, here are 2 photos from 2 different cameras: one pic from mine and one pic from theirs, you know who those 2 are. The one photo from these so-called friends of Anna Nicole Smith, and I thought mine, have photoshopped me to look super bad with an excruciatingly sore looking sunburn and discoloring my blonde hair, while these 2 over the hill “friends” are looking super smooth, sans pock marks and all, and surreal! The other photo from my camera is the original.

These 2 fake friends even had this photo posted (tagged) on my Facebook wall through a third party that is living with them, that’s how I first saw it. These photos were taken at an event at The W Hotel in Hollywood recently. They say in Hollywood “Don’t trust anyone” and this seems obviously true in this case. I emailed Rose the pics earlier and she quickly replied “Why would they do such a horrid thing?” And a later reply from her was “Jealousy”. I tend to agree, even though this photo shopped photo seems very juvenile to me.

This is the picture that was photoshopped by them

Daniel DiCriscio Patrik Simpson and Pol' Atteu after being photo shopped

In a town where mostly everyone is ego obsessed, it can sometimes be very disheartening, hurtful, and inhumane. In my opinion, I find it to be a childish form of “bullying” towards me and what they did to that photo, yet this couple doesn’t want tn be “bullied” for their sexual preferences, etc.. The funny thing is we had a good time at the event, or so I thought. And to let you know my rep took both pics.

I was beginning to wonder if the “Pee Pee” Boys were “intentionally” setting me up with this photoshopped “faux-to” to get more press off of me for themselves, ala Bobby “not so” Trendy. This also brings to mind Nathan Collins calling me up a year or so ago and wanting me to participate in a fake court case he devised for a court show that never aired. I declined his offer. I remember “the Boys”, or shall I say “Girls”, asking me if I’d be interested writing a book with them about Anna at their Seance for her. Even the Psychic, whom Anna was speaking through at the Seance, said Anna thought it was a good idea for us to write a book together.

As one of my famous clients once warned me, “If someone in Hollywood is too “syrupy sweet”, BEWARE!” I guess they may be thinking TMZ is the next stop for the photoshopped “faux-to” . . NOT!

Like Joan Jett sang in the song “Fake Friends”, ” You got nothin to lose, you don’t lose when you lose fake friends” .

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl runs that entire section don’t hesitate to contact her to make suggestions on how this forum is more user friendly.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

We listen to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.

©Daniel DiCriscio
July 13, 2011
Daniel is a feature writer for Rose Speaks.com.
Used with permission of Daniel DiCriscio Visit Daniel’s Daniel’s My Space Page to see more videos and learn more about Daniel.
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this article are based on the opinions of our feature writer, Daniel DiCriscio, This article is the sole property of Daniel DiCriscio and Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 7 Comments »

Howard K. Stern and car at Preliminary hearing

It is the picture in this article, see red circle of the car, that spawn the gossip that Howard K. Stern was driving a new Mercedes Benz and how tasteless would that be?

First I have not seen the registration nor even the license plate number and until I do I am not buying this. It could be his parents, a rental car, one for his out of town attorneys, etc. However, what if Stern bought a “new Mercedes Benz”? I just don’t think that, it is not his kind of car and what one drives to court does not mean one owns it. Remember we have all heard the stories of Stern’s like for baseball caps and to dress down, so why a Mercedes Benz? For those of you who know cars look at the hood ornament on this silver car and tell me what kind of car it is? If Stern bought this or any other car big deal, if he got money from some of the lawsuits or contracts he negotiated and he chose to buy a new car with that money, great for him. I don’t get what all of the commotion is about. If you have a copy of a registration please scan it and send it on to us, if you prove to me he does own a new Mercedes I will eat my typed words on this blog.

It appears Stern did have one set back yesterday. Judge Robert Perry after hearing the amount of money that had been made since Anna Nicole Smith’s death from body guards to Larry Birkhead, he did agree that better accommodations should be provided to the Texas crew. So out of what is fondly called the roach motel and into better quarters Don Clark and Wilma Vicedomine were entitled to. Stern’s team had paid the airfare although the duo with their attorney Neil McCabe changed it to a later flight on Monday morning, and Stern’s team had to pay for 2 nights lodging at a classier hotel. It came down to in court who was fibbing to the judge? Chris Smith, Stern’s California criminal attorney, said he had contacted the duo and had offered 48 hours notice before appearing. Mr. Smith argued that Neil McCabe should not be allowed to address the court as he was not licensed in California. In the end the Judge did allow Mr. McCabe to speak on behalf of his two Texas clients, asked what his clients wanted, asked the defense team if they were going to call them and then split the argument in half it appears to me. Stern paid the upgrade for the lodging and McCabe’s clients would be hustled out of town by Wednesday morning.

I talked to one person involved in the fiasco to be in town or not to be in town. They said the communications between Chris Smith and Wilma Vicedomine broke down when she emailed him and told him to talk and handle things through her lawyer, Neil McCabe, and Mr. Smith felt Mr. McCabe was not licensed in California. Is there hostility there on both sides?? YOU BET!!!!

However, the big news in all of this to me is that by Howard K. Stern’s legal team subpoenaing Don Clark and Wilma Vicedomine as “hostile material” witnesses for Stern, neither Clark or Vicedomine will be allowed in court for any of the hearings including the trial. I would think that someone else will have to accompany Virgie Arthur to court each day and set with her during the jury trial. In your opinion was this a good move by Stern’s legal team?

It appears the good Dr. Nathalie Maullin is NOT an EXPERT witness, she is just a witness relaying the facts as she remembered them over two years later. I was told she had the personality of aluminum foil and would be a doctor that none of the patients including Anna Nicole Smith would have felt warm, snuggly, or even comfortable with. I went to work yesterday to find out more about Dr. Maullin with the ever changing “definitions and who she talked to” taking place in court. I can sum it up in one long sentence. She had been a doctor barely two years when she “treated” Anna Nicole Smith, and she has been downgraded from the prestigious Cedars Sinai Medical Center to Kaiser Hospital. Enough said.

The other two witnesses yesterday were two pharmacists, Steve Mazlin and Romeo V. Par; very dry testimony reading their records of what was ordered when and by whom.

There was a brief walk on witness to testify that one of Anna Nicole Smith’s alias names was Charlene Underwood and Ms. Underwood made a cameo appearance as this was not her.

Judge Robert J. Perry did not have a good day and is a tad upset with everyone, by yesterday afternoon he was telling Renee Rose to move the case along. Some in the court house heard her say out of court she could be finished by Friday before noon. Court Observers are betting it will last no longer than next Tuesday, October 27. Several Court Observers also said that all three defendants would be bound over for a criminal jury trial and Judge Perry would be happy to be rid of this mess from everyone. I would imagine he has empathy for the judge that inherits this for trial. BEFORE ALL OF YOU GET UPSET!!! Remember I predicted they would be held for trial on a minimum bond, the district attorney has to basically meet the bar of standards of a ham and cheese sandwich and the pharmacists alone probably did that for the prosecution. Judge Perry wants to be done with this. This preliminary hearing has allowed the defense team to see the assistant D. A. Renee Rose in action as well as some of her star witnesses and you can bet that by trial the defense team for each of the three defendants will be loaded for bear and ready to meet and bring reasonable doubt for their clients to a jury. It was Adam Braun, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich’s attorney, who said if the district attorney’s office could not meet the low hurdle required by California statute in a preliminary hearing the assistant district attorneys should be laid off. I agree and if I was any of the defense attorneys I would just let this round go to the State of California. We will see if my prediction is correct.

Now for Mo Mo making over a hundred and fifty thousand with money from interviews which is still probably pouring in from Fox, not bad for five months of work in the beautiful Caribbean with Anna Nicole Smith paying all of his expenses while he was there. His testimony is going to get to when did you lie, at the paid media deals or now at the hearing and on to the jury trial. If Sadow did in fact cause Mo Mo to become angry and agitated then the defense learned a lot from Mo Mo’s three days of testimony and I would bet they are going to go over that transcript with a fine tooth comb so to say. If I was Renee Rose I would make sure there were more people then just Mo Mo that saw what he claims to have seen, if he is the only one I predict that will not get far with a jury.

Next up is Larry Birkhead and the 2.3 million dollars paid since Anna Nicole Smith’s death, well part of it came from NBC contracts to be Tony Potts best paid friend with exclusives for 3 to 6 months back in the spring of 2007, how ever long that contract was for. So the over one million more I would say came from other media like Fox and CBS – Entertainment tonight, and I wonder if Birkhead was also adding up the magazine layouts he has done with Dannielynn since winning the DNA test? If he can make this kind of money GREAT, it means he has the dough to take care of his daughter.

I was sent an excerpt of something that suggested Birkhead was pocketing Dannielynn’s money and cheating Dannielynn trust account, WRONG. If Larry Birkhead is in the interviews or pictures sold, the money goes to him. If the money coming in is for the use of Anna Nicole Smith’s name and/or likeness it goes into Dannielynn’s trust account. IF at a later date Birkhead decides to be in a reality show, which again I heard the first editing was a bomb, then the money MADE by Dannielynn would have to be held for her in another trust account NOT the Estates. The same goes for if she appears in pictures alone or begins to model, that money would have to be held and accounted for, EVERY penny. Since Birkhead testified that he had made that much money there is no reason to doubt him. Birkhead has also become a household name in the last 2+ years as has many in this sad saga.

The big question is did Larry Birkhead lie about the young new assistant district attorney Sarah Slice and his conversation with her. If these allegations floating around the courthouse corridors and the district attorneys office are true and Birkhead did lie what a crappy thing to do to a young assistant district attorney, in my opinion. She was back in court yesterday and all was normal and she has learned to NEVER talk to a witness outside of the courtroom. The reason is because in court it can be spun to look like you did a naughty and the witness is the victim. I do have to say this fiasco got Birkhead international coverage and bumped Mo Mo from the papers, perhaps that was the plan all alone. If Birkhead lied about his conversations with Ms. Slice then shame on him to take advantage of a new and probably friendly attorney. I bet in all future hearings involving this trial, the state of California vs. these three defendants we will see two big burly bailiffs bring Birkhead in and out of court and Sarah Slice will never forget this hard learned lesson in the legal world of the rich and famous.

I have often said this site will close before it becomes a propaganda site for either side in all of these lawsuits. However, if I am told something and I can verify it through at least one and preferably with two other independent sources it will appear here and hopefully start a good dialogue.

I hope we have debunked part of the gossip and put perspective on the rest, and yes it was the courthouse discussion as it was in the offices for the district attorney that the allegations of Birkhead lying is true, I guess we will find out with time won’t we?

There is no court today and I believe the rest of the witnesses are not going to give us the fireworks that Mo Mo and Birkhead provided.

UPDATE: I did forget to mention that there is of course some main media in the courtroom as well as bloggers covering the case. Those bloggers sharing with me or telling me where to look, they are great and neutral…. HOWEVER, there are some bloggers in the courtroom that do not appear to be fair and unbiased, they have been identified as VA bloggers and now their identities are known and they will be dealt with appropriately.

Howard K. Stern hand that caused all of the gossip

So what is in Howard K. Stern’s hand?

Day six is completed and there is approximately 4 days left until Judge Perry hands this entire mess over to the trial judge for the case. Tell us your thoughts and would someone look up the car in this picture and tell us what the hell it is?

©Rose Turner
October 21, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 111 Comments »

Steve Sadow Howard K. Stern lead criminal attorney

I had court observers tell me over and over again this week, that before this preliminary hearing started they felt it had been a fatal error on Howard K. Stern’s part to bring in an out of state lead criminal attorney, Steve Sadow. It was thought that as many good criminal attorneys as there are in California and especially around the Los Angeles area that any jury would not relate to the southerner in cowboy boots, Steve Sadow.

During the preliminary hearing we have read from court observers that Judge Robert Perry stops Sadow as he is going into a long oratory before asking a question of something like “hold on, this is a preliminary hearing not a trial keep the questions short and to the point”. Then we had Daniel DiCriscio describing in just the morning session that Steve Sadow, lead criminal attorney for Howard K. Stern, was jumping up every few seconds to object to something the Los Angeles assistant district attorney, Renee Rose would began to ask to object.

However, that seems to be evened out by the judge not allowing a lot of evidence in about Anna Nicole Smith, her life, potential sex escapes, tapes etc. that Renee Rose is trying to introduce. One witness blames Stern and Dr. Khristine Eroshevich as Mo Mo did, and then another witness does not know anything about Dr. Khris but did talk to Dr. Sandeep Kapoor and so the “show goes”.

“Show”?? Yea but about a real person’s life and every facet of it more then two years after her death, I keep asking myself why?

Did we need to know about all of her physical ailments? Did we need to know, as one writer, said where even the remote to her T. V. was kept? Did we need the dueling banjos of testimony of Mo Mo followed by Larry Birkhead to dispute that fact? Birkhead explained what seemed to be a far more logical explanation and one I had heard way back in the spring or early summer of 2007. If I could find this why did the “lead investigator” Danny Santiago NOT find this?

Everyone who is a court observer agrees that the most damning evidence to date is Mo Mo, after all he was with her the last 5 months of her life. By the way if he did that because he loved her and never got paid, doesn’t that mean he lived off of Anna Nicole Smith in the beautiful Caribbean as the fingers he pointed at Stern seemed to indicate? Why was Mo Mo willing to lie for months and months and then decided he wanted to set the record straight? For that matter which record is he sticking to finally? I have so many questions about the devoted Mo Mo and so few answers.

I have heard it said that Howard K. Stern better hope that Sadow has a big enough bat to handle Mo Mo or his legal name of Maurice Brighthaupt, and does he? Well I talked to several court observers after the almost 3 days of Mo Mo then followed by the southern voice of Larry Birkhead and here are some things they are saying. First and foremost to date the only damning witness has been Mo Mo, but let’s look at that and what some have not written about.

Under cross examination Sadow was able to agitate Mo Mo, that won’t play good to a jury for Mo Mo to appear like a giant ex bodyguard with an axe to grind with Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate which equates to Howard K. Stern and Larry Birkhead. One court observer told me about this last week that they did not care for Sadow personally but that he was “very likeable” and that is what plays to a jury. If the lawyer is likeable and has some good points and can agitate the top witness to date that does not bode well for the prosecution. One court observer told me, it does not matter if you like Sadow personally he is one hell of a likeable lawyer in court. Here is my own interpretation of what MIGHT have happened between Mo Mo and Sadow in just one question and all of you have posed some great questions here on the blog by the way. Sadow: “So Mo Mo which time are we to believe when you are choosing to tell the truth, now or when you were being paid over a hundred grand for appearances when you said something entirely different”? Mo Mo, gets agitated and glaring at the lawyer and said: “This time I am just now trying to set the record straight”. Now agitated and that lame of an excuse for lying while the money was coming in but not now, how do you think that is going to play to a jury?

I had heard the account given by Larry Birkhead about the AMA show before and have written about it. Allegedly Anna Nicole Smith had a grand mal seizure the night before her appearance. Two doctors were called and both said to give her a double dose of her seizure medication. As hard as it is for most of us to believe the beautiful Anna Nicole Smith had anxiety before a public appearance and especially for this one with her weight loss. She had insomnia and had not slept for thirty six hours straight. I have heard “gossip” that besides the seizures and no sleep she had taken a Xanax several hours before she was to appear to try to sleep. Did Mo Mo have any explanation for that? Another witness who is suppose to give damning evidence is Nathan Collins but even he told me he had asked around and had talked to Kim, Anna Nicole’s personal assistant for years and had been told way back in 2005 the same recounts as Larry Birkhead gave on Friday. So could Mo Mo have just forgotten all of that as the months and years have gradually slid past?

Then there are all of the horrid things we are learning about the health and habits of this beautiful previous playmate of the year turned model. Did any of us really or need to know about everything she suffered from? Did any of us want to really know about her personal habits including liking to drink out of a baby bottle, keeping baby food snacks near her bed and all of the other very personal things we are now finding out? I did not and it kind of makes me physically sick, how about each of you?

This brings up an email I found I still had from 2007, it is talking to someone else, now remember I have never spoken to Howard K. Stern, Larry Birkhead, Virgie Arthur, Mo Mo and most of the people in this saga and certainly NONE of Anna Nicole’s inner circle. However let me recount in part what this email says. Remember at one time I did do some domestic violence advocacy work and I can say for certain that adult survivors of child abuse are almost impossible to reach out to or help. In this email I say “I have been able to “VERIFY”…. I have no idea who I was talking about when I said “verify”. However, the email goes on to say, “there were at least four different personalities of Anna Nicole and she referred to them as this. Vickie Lynn is the girl that came from Mexia Texas, Nickie was the stripper, Anna Nicole was the model and red carpet walker, and Robin was a little girl”. I believe in the email I am musing could one of the secrets that Stern has vowed to protect in death could be the fact that Anna Nicole suffered from multiple personalities? I don’t know but those of you who have read the last week and followed Anna Nicole Smith in life, could that be true? If it is do we have the right to know all of that now over 2 years after her death?

So in the end as it appears now that all of Anna Nicole Smith’s secrets will come out will Steve Sadow have a big enough legal bat to handle those like Mo Mo as Howard K. Stern dearly hopes so? Share with us your thoughts today before the kick off of week two of the preliminary hearing and more behind the scenes habits and illnesses of Anna Nicole Smith.

We will take up our live coverage tomorrow as court reconvenes, October 19, 2009. Stay tuned here at Rose Speaks.com as we keep you up to date as the hearing unfolds from multiple court room observers.

©Rose Turner
October 18, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 36 Comments »

Rose Speaks happy 2 years and still growing

Rose Speaks.com is two years old today, thank you! Wow so many to thank.

My hubby, Ken, who kicked in to help in May when I became ill and made sure the numbers continued to grow and he actually has grown fond of blogging, must be all of the nice people who stop by and share a tad each day with Rose Speaks.com.

To Beth for the legal papers she explains so well. Heath who does so much behind the scenes that Rose Speaks.com would not be seen as running as smoothly as it does without her special “observer”, [as I have nicknamed her], touch but who does so much and never expects anything back. Roxanne our blunt, and yet kind and problem solving moderator who makes us laugh, shoots from the hip and is always there to help each member with her open email door policy and caring and keeping the problem solving running so smoothly. Diamond Girl who is taking a chance and learning the public forums and building them literally from the ground up for all of you to enjoy, be a part of it, we encourage each of you to be and she now has her own Rose Speaks.com email addy check for it in the forums. Then there are Fifi, Lian and Sammy all of whom are trying to keep the chat going, I promise ladies it will get better over the summer with more scheduled chats both just getting to know you chats and chats on the cases we are covering.

To moderators and admins who have come and gone, each leaving a permanent imprint of their presence and the many hours they gave.

To sources for articles and cases to follow, who wished to remain just that, nameless sources, thanks for your confidence in Rose Speaks.com.

Way too many to thank individually if I missed you I am sorry, post and we shall add you to the list as today goes on.

To our guest writers:

John J. Nazarian and Charlee

John J. Nazarian, Private Investigator Extraordinaire who brought us in the courtroom coverage of Anthony Pellicano, and crew and then covered the trial of Terry Christensen. He then shared his humor and his thoughts with us, made us laugh, made us think and we are the better for both. He took a risk with us before we were one year old and has brought in a lot of readers with his unique approach to all he writes about. Not to mention the added class of Charlee. Mr. Nazarian had one stead fast rule from day one, “Rose make sure you spell my name right”. We have tried and thanks for your insight and sharing with us here. Be sure you visit Mr. Nazarian’s site for your daily take on how Mr. Nazarian sees the world and blogs about DesperateExes.com.

The video person who is great at what they do and follows the best story leads for us. Staying on top of the latest news as it breaks via video from Casey Anthony in Florida, to Roland Carnaby in Houston and maintains the Rose Speaks.com You Tube channel, and do we want to cover Drew Peterson? If there is a case out there you want us to cover, and video exists let us know, we will get it up for all of you.

Lana Clarkson and Sprocket who stayed the course of the coverage on good days and those bad ones

Sprocket, who covered Phil Spector, and stayed the course, including every day for two different jury watches, and was there to see justice done for Lana Clarkson and her family and kept the only diary of the daily proceedings that can be found anywhere. We hope Sprocket will give us her insight as well on the upcoming criminal proceedings in California including Stern, Kapoor and Dr. Khris, as Sprocket said she will try to cover as much as she can with no holds barred and calling and writing as she sees it. We also look forward to Sprocket’s take on other cases.

Our Hollywood Madam sources, thanks for the head’s up and some of the documents and pictures we will be putting up as we cover this story, of Michelle Braun, as it perhaps unravels some of the rich and powerful from coast to coast here in the U. S. and if it stretches to other countries. .

Art Harris, owner of The Bald Truth who trusted me as a confidant and took me under his journalistic “wings” and taught me so much as a teacher, mentor, and friend.

Daniel DiCriscio, the Messiah of Makeovers

Daniel DiCriscio, the Messiah of Makeovers, who is witty, but also writes some gut wrenching and the kind that makes you cry as he brings us into the world we call Hollyweird. Daniel DiCriscio covers the L. A. Scene for us, and will be covering Howard K. Stern, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, and Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, will be there for the preliminary hearings. Wow two weeks of evidence we have all held our breaths until we see who are the witnesses.

All things Anna Nicole Smith, those intertwining at every corner that put Rose Speaks.com on the map so we could attract writers like John J. Nazarian, Sprocket and Daniel DiCriscio.

Those who have given us Exclusive interviews including:

Pol Atteu’ and Patrik Simpson, who gave us exclusive interviews and insights to their lawsuit they recently won their daughter’s graduation from high school and new things on the horizons for them.

Nathan Collins, who told us the truth about his relationship with Daniel Smith (and no we did not publish it) his frank honesty is something we will go back to as all of the trials continue forward.

But most of all to you the readers, who keep coming back with new ones added weekly. Our thanks whether you post or lurk, you make us all want to just do better, making Rose Speaks.com we hope informative, sharing of intelligent thoughts and ideas on the cases we pick to cover, the cases each of you help us pick with suggestions.

As always, thank you for flying Rose Speaks.com, each of you keep the energy flowing; the enjoyment of legal papers; learning from each other; intelligent thoughts shared with one and all and giving lessons to each new person with one of our mottos, “let google be your friend.”.

My deepest and heartfelt thanks to each of you for just hanging with us through those rough times and coming through them with us making sure we grow in readership and we hope get better because of you, the readers.

©Rose Turner, Lover of Legal Papers
June 24, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 113 Comments »

Weather forecast by WP Wunderground & Denver Snow Removal

Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith