LATEST FILINGS IN HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS LAWSUIT

July 14, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Supplement in Opposition to Virgie Arthur Motion to Compel. Exhibit A is the First Court of Appeals decision regarding Stern’s Writ of Mandamus which is linked in this article.

July 14, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Motion to Vacate Discover Order of May 11, 2009.

July 14, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibit A filed with Stern’s Motion to Vacate Discover Order of May 11, 2009. Exhibit B is the First Court of Appeals decision regarding Stern’s Writ of Mandamus which is linked in this article.

July 14, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Notice of Oral Hearing for August 6, 2010 at 2:30 PM for the latest filings by Stern.

July 14, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Letter to the First Court of Appeals filed with Arthur’s Motion of an En Banc hearing.

July 14, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Rehearing En Banc with the First Court of Appeals Opinion released on July 1, 2010 pointing out what Arthur sees as factual errors in that Opinion.

July 14, 2010 Stephens’ Writ of Mandamus denied by the First Court of Appeals. IMO this changes the options available to the defendants who appear to not be covered under the Opinion granting the Writs for Stern and Harris. I notice this denial was handed down by the same panel that granted the other two Writs

LATEST FILINGS IN THE HARRIS COUNT 80TH DISTRICT COURT ON VIRGIE ARTHUR VS. HOWARD K. STERN ET. AL.

July 16, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Continuance on Howard K. Stern’s Special Appearance set for August 6, 2010 at 2:30 P. M.

July 16, 2010 Affidavit of Neil McCabe in support of Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Continuance on Howard K. Stern’s Special Appearance set for August 6, 2010 at 2:30 P. M.

July 16, 2010 Exhibit A filed with Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Continuance on Howard K. Stern’s Special Appearance set for August 6, 2010 at 2:30 P. M.

July 16, 2010 Exhibit B filed with Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Continuance on Howard K. Stern’s Special Appearance set for August 6, 2010 at 2:30 P. M.

July 16, 2010 Exhibit C filed with Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Continuance on Howard K. Stern’s Special Appearance set for August 6, 2010 at 2:30 P. M.

July 16, 2010 Exhibit D filed with Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Continuance on Howard K. Stern’s Special Appearance set for August 6, 2010 at 2:30 P. M.

Before Howard K. Stern, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor and Dr. Khristine Eroshevich trial starts on August 2, 2010, Rose Speaks.com is going to complete Dr. Cyril H. Wecht and Dawna Kaufmann two chapters from A Question of Murder” with interviews with both authors. We have been able to verify that Dr. Khristine Eroshevich is on her fourth set of criminal lawyers. The latest one is suppose to be of the Phil Specter “fame”, Bradley Brunon, and we all know how that ended up for Specter, but when Brunon represented Specter, the first go around he was able to get a hung jury for Specter. That said our independent source said; “Bradley Brunon, you may know that name from Phil Spector’s first trial and he certainly is an excellent, very accomplished, veteran defense attorney”.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
July 17, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: A Question of Murder, Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, Bradley Brunon Esq., Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Dawna Kaufmann, Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Christopher Smith Esq., L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Neil McCabe, Rose Turner, Steve Sadow Esq., The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Virgie Arthur

Thanks for the emails of concern, I appreciate them, actually I have begun to trace my family from the U. K. via the May Flower in 1620 and forward… it is additive… however have no fear I am back and will be putting up a new article at least every other day while we catch up on all of the cases we are covering not just all things Anna Nicole Smith, Howard K. Stern etc.

NEWEST PAPERS IN TEXAS CASE:

June 1, 2010 Court Order with new Docket Control Dates, as well I expect this all to change again because of the pending hearings, Motions, depositions, etc. I just don’t see it being done by August 17, 2010 regarding Discovery let alone the Writs decided by the First Court of Appeals and the Howard K. Stern Motions set for hearing on August 6, 2010. I see the Court once again changing all of the dates.

June 8, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Notice of hearing on all Motions pending against Howard K. Stern on August 6, 2010 at 2:30 PM at the same time Stern has all of his Motion’s set.

June 9, 2010 Letter from her to her mother from 2000.

Excepts Anna Nicole Smith’s Diary from 1991 and 1992.

I am putting this up because I believe they have been public since probably 2007, just not easily located. By going through the diary excerpts I found several interesting things. 1.) Anna Nicole Smith was a very screwed up woman, however she knew what she wanted any child to look like and it was not Howard K. Stern. 2) Stern was so in meshed with his love and/or addiction to Anna Nicole Smith that he would have said and done anything she wanted. 3) That goes along with what many of you have said but I was unable to believe and that is Stern knew all along that Dannielynn was not his daughter but Larry Birkhead’s which is kind of sad he was willing to lie for Anna to have a baby and no father. I think Anna desperately wanted love and feared being alone, the diary shows she was a very lonely woman IMO. It also shows she appears to have been attractive to abusive men, I found that interesting. How sad she finally got the blond hair blue eye baby she so wanted before Daniel grew up and left home; a child loves unconditionally and I see a woman in here that displays that over and over again. I think the significance I see in this is that Virgie Arthur is going to be able to show that Stern lied and attack his character and credibility on those facts. So to those of you who told me over and over again that Howard K. Stern knew he was not the father, you had greater insight in to all things Anna Nicole Smith and I did not. I remember when the DNA was announced and I called Krista Barth and cried on the phone with her for poor Howard, boy did I call that one wrong.

June 11, 2010 Order to remove Turner’s Medical Records from the Harris County Clerk public site stating the records are protective under TRCP 76a(2)(a)(2) based the access of the medical records is otherwise restricted by law.

MORE PAPERS WILL BE UP AS WE GET THEM ON ANY AND ALL CASES.

HOUSEKEEPING DOCUMENTS FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

May 6, 2010 Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate Motion for Stay of Mandate pending the filing a Motion for Stay Pending Petition for Certiorari to the U. S. Supreme Court. This filing has some new facts for the appeal listed by the attorneys for the Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate.

May 12, 2101 Order from the Ninth Circuit of Court of Appeals GRANTING Stay of Mandate.

NEWS ON THE CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL TRIAL

Multiple sources have told me that Dr. Khristine Eroshevich is on her fourth attorney in the criminal case, NOT good wonder what the problem is with her and her attorneys? Stern and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor has kept their legal teams in tact from the beginning. Could Eroshevich being going through lawyers like stockings you discard because you don’t like them or is this a smart ploy to get the August trial date moved past the California elections in November of this year. I was also told that Nazarian and Associates are no longer representing her. I was not able to contact any of the attorneys involved in this musical chair like of switching attorneys, however I was able to get in touch with Nazarian and Associates and asked them if that was true only to be turned away with the norm for Hollywood of “No Comment at this time”. So what’s up with Dr. Eroshevich? Perhaps y’all are again right in your take she is going down for that laundry list of drugs but not Kapoor or Stern. It appears I might have called this one of none convicted as wrong, glad I don’t bet on football or horses.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
June 9, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Alan Diamond Esq., Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, Bruce Ross Esq., CBS-ET, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Edward L. Xanders esq., Entertainment Tonight, Estate of Anna Nicole smith, Estate of Pierce Marshall, Greines Martin Stein & Richland LLP, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Holland & Knight LLP, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Christopher Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, Kent L. Richland Esq., L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Nazarian and Associates, Neil McCabe, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Philip W. Boesch, Philip W. Boesch Jr. Esq., Pierce Marshall, Rose Turner, Steve Sadow Esq., The Boesch Law Group, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, U. S. Supreme Court, Virgie Arthur, Vivian L. Thoreen Esq.

ALL OF THE POSTS RELATING TO THE MARK HATTEN ALLEGATIONS ARE BEING MOVED TO THIS NEW ARTICLE:

~ What are the laws for filing a false police report with intent to HARM the person they are accusing?
~ What are the laws for wrongly accusing someone who is the Plaintiff in a case against your sibling for leverage?
~ What are the laws for MAKING SURE this false report got in the MSM (Main Stream Media) right before any court dates in CA where the Defendant is also a Plaintiff against the malicious accuser’s sister?

Per Swims of TMZ some interesting questions and thoughts on Mark Hatten:

The Public needs to know quickly:

• Is nut case MH at it again, yes or no? If not -
• What is the extent of the involvement of JB’s Office?
• What is the extent of the LA Prosecutors’ involvement?
• What is the extent of VA and her people’s involvement?

An ongoing discussion based on the article on TMZ.com with the police report filed by Mark Hatten in S. C. and the statement given by Howard K. Stern’s lawyer Chris Smith to Radar online.com last night.

“I wish to put to rest the latest accusations by Mark Hatten,” attorney J. Christopher Smith told RadarOnline.com. “They are absolutely false. Mr. Stern has not in any way made any recent attempts to contact or threaten Mr. Hatten.”

“Mr. Stern does not even have a MySpace account,” Stern’s lawyer insisted. “The hope is that MySpace and the authorities at the Greeleyville Police Department will quickly conduct the appropriate investigation. At which point, they will most certainly conclude that there is absolutely no basis in fact to this ridiculous story.”

FILINGS IN TEXAS STATE SUIT OF VIRGIE ARTHUR VS. HOWARD K. STERN, LARRY BIRKHEAD, TMZ.COM, HARVEY LEVINE, ART HARRIS ET. AL.

May 21, 2010 Art Harris Response to Virgie Arthur Motion for Rehearing. NOTE FROM ROSE: OK I was wrong here, I thought that Harris would let this be ruled solely on the Court Abusing its Discretion violating Rule 171 on appointing a Special Master. This shows how we can all still learn. I did not know that an exhibit to a Motion was in fact a Motion. The Response for Request for Production to Arthur was things that attorneys send out to just the other parties. I did not know because a Protective Order was requested in a Response that once it was filed with a Motion to Compel that part then of itself becomes a Motion for Protective Order once filed as an exhibit to the Motion to Compel. I continue to learn from all of these filings. Looks like the First Court of Appeals got it right the first time around.

May 21, 2010 Howard K. Stern Reply in Support of his Motion to Quash Deposition and for a Protective Order.

May 21, 2010 Stern’s Exhibit A filed with Reply in Support of his Motion to Quash Deposition and for a Protective Order.

May 21, 2010 Howard K. Stern Motion to Clarify or Set Aside the Rule 11 Agreement with Virgie Arthur.

May 21, 2010 Stern Exhibit A filed with the Motion to Clarify or Set Aside the Rule 11 Agreement with Virgie Arthur.

May 21, 2010 Stern Exhibit B filed with the Motion to Clarify or Set Aside the Rule 11 Agreement with Virgie Arthur.

May 21, 2010 Stern Exhibit C filed with the Motion to Clarify or Set Aside the Rule 11 Agreement with Virgie Arthur.

May 21, 2010 Stern Exhibit D filed with the Motion to Clarify or Set Aside the Rule 11 Agreement with Virgie Arthur.

May 21, 2010 Stern Exhibit E filed with the Motion to Clarify or Set Aside the Rule 11 Agreement with Virgie Arthur.

May 21, 2010 Stern Exhibit F filed with the Motion to Clarify or Set Aside the Rule 11 Agreement with Virgie Arthur.

Stern’s Notice of New Hearing Date set by the Court’s Calendar for Hearings to August 6, 2010 at 2:30 P. M.

May 21, 2010 Art Harris Sur-Reply to Rose Turner’s Response, to Art Harris Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 21, 2010 Harris Exhibit A filed with Sur-Reply to Rose Turner’s Response, to Art Harris Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 21, 2010 Harris Exhibit B filed with Sur-Reply to Rose Turner’s Response, to Art Harris Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 21, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Response to Art Harris Sur-Reply to Rose Turner’s Response, to Art Harris Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

Arthur’s Exhibit A filed with Arthur’s Response to Art Harris Sur-Reply to Rose Turner’s Response, to Art Harris Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

Arthur’s Exhibit B filed with Arthur’s Response to Art Harris Sur-Reply to Rose Turner’s Response, to Art Harris Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
May 21, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Beverly Hiliss, Bonnie Stern, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Chris Smith Esq., Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Entertainment Tonight, Estate of Anna Nicole smith, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Christopher Smith Esq., Jackid Hatten, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Mark "Hollywood" Hatten, Mark Hatten, Neil McCabe, Only Swim in the Ocean, Questions posed by Swim on TMZ, Radar Online.com, Rose Turner, Steve Sadow Esq., The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Virgie Arthur

August 4, 2010 is the date of the first day that the trial for Howard K. Stern, Dr. Kapoor and Dr. Eroshevich begins! I think it might last two – four weeks, what do you think?

The next date for a preliminary hearing before trial was set by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David Wesley is for Motions and “housekeeping rulings” which is normal in this type of proceedings.

Howard K. Stern is represented by Steve Sadow U. S. famous criminal lawyer from Atlanta Georgia and J. Christopher “Chris” Smith the up and coming California criminal lawyer that allegedly the assistant D. A. in Los Angeles does not like to go up against, both are good and both have very different styles. Dr. Khirstine Eroshevich is represented by one of the best Los Angeles criminal lawyer the young, good and attorney to watch in the future, famous Adam Braun, who is the son of Harland Braun; with the help of John J. Nazarian renowned private investigator, and celebrity in his own right regarding numerous famous clients over the decades he has been one of the best, if you can afford him. Dr. Sandeep Kapoor is represented by attorney, Ellyn Gerafalo Esq. of Hollywood Madam fame.

We have two bloggers inside the court that just shared that with us, perhaps later we can confirm that through one of the lawyers.

The Medical Board also wants access to hundreds of Dr. Kapoor’s medical records of patients because of a long period of allegedly prescribing history he has and especially with some celebrities like Anna Nicole Smith. Rumor has it that his celebrity clients are now getting prescriptions in their real names which keeps the gossip sites on their toes trying to get a sneak peek at the name on bottles, that should make the famous in Hollywood worried for privacy if true.

Stay tuned to Rose Speaks.com as we get more information we will keep you all updated.

We will also have some new papers up on several trials we are following today.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
February 5, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Adam Braun Esq., Anna Nicole Smith, Beverly Hills, Celebrity Trials, Chris Smith California criminal attorney, Criminal Trial of Stern and two doctors, Dannielynn, Dr. Kapoor, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Erosevich, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Christopher Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Judge David Wesley, L. Lin Wood, Stanley Mosk Court House, Steve Sadow Esq.

After turning down Feel Good California Attorney General Jerry Brown’s, via his deputy attorney general on December 11, 2009 and denying the suspension of Dr. Sandeep Kapoor and Dr. Khristine Eroshevich license Judge David Wesley gave Brown and his people a week to file a Motion and then Argue to the court on December 18, 2009.

Judge David Wesley said on December 11, 2009 that if the Medical Board was via the Attorney General office was concerned with the doctors’ practices, the Medical Board could apply for an order to monitor them.

Thus Deputy Attorney General E.A. Jones III, who reports directly to Brown, spent another week doing a Motion to monitor the two doctors and appeared yesterday to argue again.

Superior Court Judge David Wesley was not impressed with Jones’ second go around with a new Motion. Judge Wesley listened to Deputy Attorney General E.A. Jones III argument about why it would be in the public interest to now monitor the doctors. Judge Wesley read the newest Motion and listened to Jones’ “fresh arguments”; a couple of court room watchers said that Judge Wesley could be seen becoming agitated as Jones’ listed all of the reasons. Someone who has seen Deputy Attorney General E.A. Jones III in action before, said Jones is everything you don’t want a lawyer to be. He does not know how to give a presentation in court and he cannot keep his voice level, not a good face for the Attorney General’s office.

Not only did Judge Wesley deny the newest motion but decided to give Deputy Attorney General E.A. Jones III a few tips on how to prepare a Motion for presentation in his court. First the Motion was ill written and so was the argument before the court, also Judge Wesley pointed out that the Motion had “Typos” in it. The judge admonished Jones again for the second straight week, sending him packing to update his boss, AG Feel Good Brown

Feel Good Brown needed this to pass because he needs some face time with a press conference, although Brown commanded a huge lead for governor since the summer, he is now slipping in the polls. Add to that Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger continues to slash jobs and money from the state’s budget to keep California afloat. Recently there was almost $393 million dollars for the Los Angeles County Courts and included one day a month that all employees take a day off without pay. Which leads me to the question, with all of those people employed is Brown’s office hiring the best in public service? He might think of redoing his office to get some proof reader to assure the embarrassment of Friday does not happen again.

We will also be adding the Tarrant County Case Files in our member only forums over the weekend.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on other sites.

©Rose Turner
December 19, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Adam Braun, Adam Braun Esq., AG Jerry Brown, Anna Nicole Smith, Arnold Schwarzenegger, California AG Jerry Brown, California Medical Board, Celebrity Trials, Chris Smith Esq., Deputy Attorney General E.A. Jones III, Dr. Kapoor, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, E.A. Jones III California, Feel Good Jerry Brown, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, J. Christopher Smith, J. Christopher Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Judge David Wesley, Judge Wesley, L. A. Superior Court Judge Wesley, Los Angeles County Courts, Steve Sadow, Steve Sadow Esq.

After a brief blogging break I am back…I was involved with the pre-lim of Howard K. Stern, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich and Dr. Kapoor, all of these people are being represented by some of the best criminal defense attorneys in the United States. Steve Sadow for me has been a sleeper, this guy is nothing but entertaining in his :delivery,” and I promise you all that Mr. Sadow will be very entertaining during the trial. It took me several days to warm up to him, but when I saw what he was capable of, I have to say that Mr. Stern is in very good hands with Sadow. Christopher Smith, Esq. is also sitting second chair to Sadow, Chris is another class act and a “sleeper,” very talented. We have Adam Braun handling the defense of Dr. Eroshevich with a very different style than that of Sadow. Both of these lawyers have some big surprises for the gaggle of misfits coming to town for their “15 minutes.” Kapoor is being represented by Ellyn Gerafalo, the only female attorney in this powerhouse of legal talent. Ms. Gerafalo is also in a league all of her own, knows her stuff and she is tough….In the defense of Kapoor even a lawyer of Ms. Gerafalo’s calibre may not be enough, Kapoor has sealed his fate, again my opinion. My leaving the Howard K. Stern defense team was a good thing and I look back at the decision fondly.

There were a few days that I had to deal with other assignments, and of course when Birkhead showed up…

….Judge Robert J. Perry gave all involved as much room to present and to make clear their positions as was legally possible. …Special Agent Santiago looked a little like a man in a rowing competition with “short oars.” One of the other Special Agents, Jennifer Doss, got a little dressing down by Judge Perry when he interrupted her roll and said, “I’m supposed to be making a decision whether a crime was committed, I don’t want you saying that you think a crime was committed.” …

…There is not a question in my mind that if one would have had a crystal ball and could see into the future, if knowing Michael Jackson was going to take an eternal dirt nap, the State of California would have waited and avoided the Anna Nicole Smith matter like a plague….

…This case has affected so many, and at some point I will express my thoughts on this case and the stuff that I have read, noticed and observed as only an ex-copper can. I owe no allegiance to anyone, and taking this very position will I am sure have “Old Blabbermouth” going into action. For this individual I have a very special set of scissors to do some very serious “wing clipping,” all in 2010!

To read the rest of this article go to Desperate Exes.com and read about John J. Nazarian’s new and old “friends” including Ms. Vicedomine. The article on Mr. Nazarian’s site is much longer than our lead in here.

http://desperateexes.com/2009/11/03/catching-up-on-stern-kapoor-eroshevich-and-new-old-pals/.

©John J. Nazarian
November 3, 2009
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Adam Braun Esq., Anna Nicole Smith, Celebrity Trials, Chris Smith Esq., Christopher Smith Esq., Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Danny Santiago, Desperateexes.com, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Dr. Conrad Murray, Dr. Kapoor, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Christopher Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Judge Perry California Superior Court, Judge Robert J. Perry, Kapoor hides medical records, Michael Jackson, Neil McCabe, Special Agent Jennifer Doss, Special Agent Santiago, State of California, Steve Sadow Esq., Virgie Arthur

With a head line like that you can just imagine where this article is going.

I woke up this morning to a bunch of B. S. in my in box and was sure this was a surreal Trick or Treat Halloween prank and a pretty good one I thought. That is until I realized it was REAL and then the anger and feeling sick began to settle in.

We have Rita Cosby’s good friend, James Edstrom, writing on his “gossip site” today that at a party or nightclub he was at in December 2007 that O’Quinn was, “Two Sheets to the Wind”. We are please to say because of a tad of nudging by Rose Speaks.com, Edstrom cleaned up his article and gave Mr. O’Quinn the credit he deserved and took away the New York style of bragging when you really can’t remember for sure what happened.

The Houston Chronicle is now reporting that John O’Quinn was driving at a high rate of speed when his SUV became airborne and impaled on a t tree killing O’Quinn and Johnny Cutliff instantly. The Houston Police Department has turned the investigation over to it’s “Vehicle Crimes” department for a thorough investigation. That department said although the road was slightly wet it would not have caused the type of accident that killed O’Quinn and Johnny Cutliff unless O’Quinn had been traveling at a high rate of speed. They have recovered John O’Quinn’s cell phone from the wreckage and with that and the black box from the SUV they hope to have some answers next week. It will take several weeks to get the toxicology reports back, but police said it did not appear that any medication etc. was involved in the fatal crash. Which brings up a question I have. We have all heard the stories of a police officer placing a speeding ticket in the pocket of a speeder killed in a vehicle accident, could a posthumous charge apply to O’Quinn for the death of Johnny Cutliff? Mr. O’Quinn’s funeral will be on November 4, 2009 at 11 AM at the Second Baptist Church in Houston with a showing open to the public from 4PM to 8 PM on November 3. We do not have the funeral arrangements yet for Mr Cutliff but as soon as we do we will list it here for those of his friends whom have asked us to keep them updated.

With John O’Quinn now dead the fear of Houston publications being sued by this giant of a man literally and figuratively. They appear to be beginning understanding that and so slowly they are printing “their truth” about O’Quinn. Some if it includes that; “The death of John O’Quinn in a single-car vehicle crash abruptly and prematurely ended the saga of a man as big and brash and full of contradictions as his native city.” The Houston Chronicle article went on to say in part; “Like Houston — a brilliant, rambunctious city that sometimes seems to have a chip on its shoulder — the 68-year-old, 6-foot-4 O’Quinn combined great achievement, wealth and generosity with a gnawing insecurity. In this brilliant, rambunctious lawyer’s case, it took the form of alcohol abuse and a tendency to push his practice of law beyond his acknowledged courtroom brilliance to the ethical boundaries of the profession.”

“…O’Quinn was demonized by tort reform advocates as a symbol of frivolous lawsuits and outrageously large damage awards. … O’Quinn established himself as a premier plaintiff’s lawyer in a city renowned for its legal giants. Yet he rarely seemed at peace with that status, trying to fill a void that money and fame could not reach. In recent years, O’Quinn’s friends say he found a measure of contentment and stability. Even so, it’s hard to imagine this most dynamic of Houstonians ever wanting to rest in peace.” Many in Texas say that John O’Quinn almost single handed was the motivation for tort reform in Texas and thus Texas is now a safe haven for doctors to practice and not have to pay a fortune for malpractice insurance.

Virgie Arthur, Anna Nicole Smith’s estranged mother, will be making her first public interview since the Inquest into Daniel Smith’s death in 2008. Ms. Arthur has returned to a trusted allied in Geraldo Rivera to do the interview. It is ironic the interview will on Halloween night, kind of fits Geraldo’s bizarre sensationalism. Ms. Arthur is expected to talk about her personal loss with John O’Quinn’s death. Knowing Geraldo though I am willing to bet the conversation will cross over to her enemy Howard K. Stern being bound over for trial in California with two of Smith’s doctors, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor and Khristine Eroshevich with the third arraignment of the three scheduled for December 11. Surely as a “lawyer” (cough – cough) Gerlado knew this was to be expected and is no real win which equals high fives for his participation in this “alleged” lynching. So be sure and set your clocks for Geraldo, have a glass of red wine and see how Geraldo turns all of this into sensational infotainment for the All Mighty Dollar, [advertising revenue]. Does Geraldo, you think, ever feel any shame or is the nature of infotainment is those who bring in the advertising dollars get to keep their much lusted after shows?

Then there is Harvey Levin, the Jewish gay lawyer/journalist that has made internet sensationalism via his celebrity gossip blog into a way to bring in tons of money via advertising. Are we seeing a picture emerge here that involved infotainment and dollar signs? There are plenty of allegations around Hollyweird, we have learned, that Levin, if our source is correct and the allegations are true, also shares one thing with Anna Nicole Smith – an addiction to Methadone. Isn’t he just a tad afraid that feel good Jerry Brown might hone in on him next?

Levin, since Anna Nicole Smith’s death, has hardly held back his personal disdain for Howard K. Stern while showing favor in positive articles for his “good friend”, Larry Birkhead. Levin and his staff have allowed, since 2007, many – many posts of anti-Semitism and right down hate for Stern to flourish uncontrolled on TMZ.com and often fed by Harvey Levin via TMZ.com.

The sickest example of this lust for that all mighty advertising dollar, is the horrid reference to the now infamous Anna Nicole Smith’s clown video that has been released in public discovery in both the New York defamation suit of Howard K. Stern vs. Rita Cosby but also as of yesterday the California criminal proceedings.

If one is to believe what Harvey Levin appears to be alleging about Anna Nicole Smith in her ninth month of pregnancy, then we must assume Levin is implying that Dannielynn Birkhead was born suffering from the effects of multiple drug addictions. Now how is Levin going to explain that one to his good friend Larry Birkhead? Perhaps the free face time and positive press he has always lavish on Birkhead will be enough for Birkhead to forgive what Levin appears to saying in his most recent allegations involving the infamous clown tape and Howard K. Stern.

I bet this morning or yesterday, Levin was beating himself up for not buying that tape himself at the time he bought the photos of the refrigerator from the Bahamas home known as Horizons; the infamous unfilled fax for medication from Dr. Eroshevich to Dr. Kapoor just days after Daniel Smith, Anna Nicole’s son, died. Then of course there are those continuous changing and selling of affidavits by the nannies which neither the National Inquirer or Birkhead found to be believable but Levin bought them right up for publication on TMZ. Do you feel sorry that Levin let the infamous clown video slip through his greedy hands?

Harvey have you not been watching the preliminary hearing and the sharpness of Stern’s criminal attorney Steve Sadow? My bet is you ain’t seen nothing yet, and get some new news not the recycle bull shit appearing on your web celebrity slamming blog site. You like all of us knew Stern and the two doctors would be bound over for trial, so why the cheap shots by you? Oh yea I forgot that constant chase for the illusive advertising dollars in a shaky economy.

Finally we have Lin Wood playing with Georgia Attorney Susan M. Brown a frustrating game for him called “where are the hard drives”.

In the latest filings in the South Carolina federal court the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith is asking for contempt charges and sanctions against G. Ben Thompson and his “former” attorney, Susan M. Brown.

In more of the excerpt of Brown’s deposition released with the October 29 filing, you have to wonder where Brown got her law license. Now to think that Wood made a comment about Texas lawyers lacking ethics, I bet he is feeling a Georgia lawyer is also a tad shy of ethics today.

As you read the excerpt with again some pages redacted, at the end do you have any clear idea of “where are the hard drives”?

I came away scratching my head after seeing so many attorneys in the deposition of Susan M. Brown in person and by phone distancing themselves from Brown in what has to be an old time record of “we don’t have them, do you”, behavior, of “where’s the hard drives”.

What does happen to an attorney if it is proven that she did commit a crime of fraud as the Memorandum from the Georgia Court ordering her to appear for a deposition states and proves to be true?

There is the Motion for Contempt, the Memorandum of Law in support of the contempt and sanctions, new exhibits to read, some old exhibits referred to and the excerpt of Lin Wood trying to pin a room full of lawyer down to “Where are the hard drives” in a game which is funny and sad at the same time.

Ah the continued entwining of all things Anna Nichol Smith and the money and publicity she has continued to earn in death. Do you think the Georgia attorney, Susan M. Brown is being investigated for ethics violations in Georgia as well as the charges she faces in South Carolina?

Ms. Brown as does Gaither Thompson II, Gina Thompson Shelley and Melody Thompson have to file their answers by November 16 after being added to the lawsuit in place of a few Doe names. We also have a far more serious filing from Brown due on November 16, the Contempt of Court and Request for Sanctions against both her and her previous, or is she still his current lawyer, G. Ben Thompson. Ah to be a fly on the wall when that hearing finally takes place.

Is Anna Nicole Smith more famous in death then she ever was in life? Has her death created a new piranha feeding frenzy not seen before in the land of gossip and infotainment?

I’ll get back with all of you after I force myself to watch Geraldo, I really don’t like the guy. I wonder how Virgie Arthur looks after being out of the lime light for the last 18 months.

We will have all of the latest documents listed by date and court here today. Check back and remember that the downloads are opened to ALL not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

October 29, 2009 Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate Motion for Contempt and Sanctions against G. Ben Thompson and lawyer Susan Brown for keeping Estate property and copies of property WAY after the Court Ordered all property and copies of property to be returned to Wood’s office.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2618.

October 29, 2009 Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate Memorandum of Law to support the Motion for Contempt and Sanctions against G. Ben Thompson and lawyer Susan Brown for keeping Estate property and copies of property WAY after the Court Ordered all property and copies of property to be returned to Wood’s office.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2619.

October 29, 2009 Exhibit A of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley, et. al, which is an additional excerpt of the deposition of Susan Brown from October 5, 2009.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2617.

October 29, 2009 Exhibit C of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley, et. al, which is the courier receipt for picking up the Hard Drives to deliver them to Wood’s office dated January 21. 2009.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2620.

October 29, 2009 Exhibit H of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley, et. al, which a letter from Teresa E. Lazzarom to Luke Lantta returning additional Estate property dated September 22, 2009.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2621.

October 29, 2009 Exhibit I of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley, et. al, which a second letter from Teresa E. Lazzarom to Luke Lantta returning additional Estate property dated September 24, 2009.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2622.

October 29, 2009 Exhibit K of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley, et. al, which is an Affidavit from Niall Cronnolly that the hard drive had been removed from Susan Brown’s computer on October 8, 2009 and destroyed and method used to destroy the hard drive on October 9, 2009 at 11:15 AM.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2623.

©Rose Turner
October 31, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Adam Braun Esq., AG Jerry Brown, Anna Nicole Smith, Bryan Cave LLP, Celebrity News, Celebrity Trials, Chris Smith Esq., Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Dr. Kapoor, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Elizabeth McNamara, Elizabeth McNamara Esq., Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., Estate of Anna Nicole smith, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Gaither Thompson II, Geraldo - Live, Geraldo At Large, Geraldo FOX News, Geraldo Rivera, Gina Thompson Shelley, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Horizons Lawsuit Bahamas, Howard K Stern, Infotainment, Infotainment News, J. Christopher Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., John O'Quinn, Johnny Cutliff, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Melody Thompson, Neil McCabe, Nicole Jennings Wade Esq., Rita Cosby, Stancil Fod Shelly, Steve Sadow Esq., The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Virgie Arthur