Posts Tagged “High Profile Trials”

NCIS star Pauley Perrette snared in Nightmare of ongoing legal battle

NCIS star Pauley Perrette snared in Nightmare of ongoing legal battle


In an article on Courthouse News yesterday, March 24, 2014, by MATT REYNOLDS outlines how the ongoing drama between Pauley Perrette and her ex-husband Coyote Shivers appears to continue.

As soon as we can find whether this case is in Domestic Court, Criminal Court or Civil Court we will attempt to get the paperwork.

The article outlines the following:

LOS ANGELES (CN) – “NCIS” star Pauley Perrette sought restraining orders against her ex-husband Francis Shivers, who now claims in court that his ex-wife is gaming the court system and terrorizing him.

Perrette successfully obtained court orders against Shivers after they separated in 2004 and divorced in 2006.

Shivers later faced allegations from his previous wife, model and singer Bebe Buell, and ex-girlfriend Angela Garber, that he was physically and psychologically abusive.

All three women have claimed that Shivers harasses them through bogus complaints and requests for restraining orders, according to a September 2009 story from Fox News.

TMZ reported in 2012 that Shivers was arrested for violating the terms of a restraining order by showing up to eat at the same sushi restaurant Perrette was in.

But in his new Superior Court complaint, Francis “Coyote” Shivers, 48, calls himself an “unwilling victim.” He claims that Perrette, 44, was inspired by an unsold screenplay she wrote, “Star Crazy,” in which an actress takes revenge on a man who rejected her.

“Perrette never succeeded in selling her ‘Star Crazy’ script,” Shivers says in his complaint. “Instead, she decided to act it out in real life with plaintiff as her unwilling victim and co-star.”

Shivers claims Perrette attempted to break into the house he was living in when he filed for divorce in 2004, and says he sought a restraining order against the actress in early 2005.

During a “decade-long campaign of harassment,” Perrette has “intended to financially, physically, and emotionally ruin plaintiff,” the 11-page lawsuit states.

Shivers reportedly married Brazilian journalist and author Mayra Dias Gomes in 2010. The actor and musician claims that Perrette admitted to hiring investigators to snoop on him, and has dug up personal financial information on his wife.

Shivers claims that Perrette and her fiancé, former British Royal Marine and actor Thomas Arklie set a trap for him at the Shintaro restaurant so he would unwittingly violate the terms of the restraining order.

In November 2012, Shivers claims, he and his wife went to the Shintaro restaurant, an eatery he frequented, to find Perrette and Arklie waiting for them.

Shivers says he tried to leave and claims Perrette and Arklie “moved their bodies to a location anticipated to be in proximity to them [Shivers and his wife], for the ulterior purpose of triggering violation of the temporary restraining order.”

The lawsuit claims that Perrette and Arklie secured a criminal protective order after Shivers, “in self-defense, instinctively began to record Arklie’s attempted assault and pursuit of plaintiff as he and his wife attempted to exit the Shintaro restaurant.”

Furthermore, Shivers says, Perrette has tried to stop him from using the word “stalker” when referring to her on Twitter and has incited “NCIS” fans, who have sent him death threats.

Perrette paints herself as a “victim of real-life domestic abuse so as to promote her police procedural drama television series at the expense of plaintiff’s rights and wellbeing,” Shivers claims.

“Prior to the March 20, 2012 incident at Shintaro, defendant Perrette had testified in other proceedings, and the court had found, that there had in fact been no history of any domestic violence,” the lawsuit states.

Alleging assault, abuse of process and intentional infliction of emotional distress, Shivers seeks punitive damages and costs.

He identifies Perrette by the name Laura Pauline Perrett in his complaint. He also names Arklie as a co-defendant.

He is represented by Hirad Dadgostar.

It appears that Perrette will again be spending money on lawyers to unravel this latest turn in a saga that has been ongoing since 2004.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

By Rose Turner
March 25, 2014
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on ‘NCIS’ Star Pauley Perrette in Real-Life Domestic Drama

John Nazarian has a great panel discussing men rights group. This includes Bonnie Russell of San Diego an advocate to get divorces moved from family courts and back to civil court. Dr. Glenn Lipson a forensic psychologist and fellow PI Mike Spencer. This was a special show for 90 minutes and covered a LOT of different views.

New Current Events Podcasts with John J Nazarian Unleashed on BlogTalkRadio

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
February 9, 2014
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on John Nazarian Discusses MRA groups

Dean Esmay

Dean Esmay

Paul Elam

Paul Elam

I have to admit I don’t get why people misrepresent facts and then rile people up into a frenzy and send them out on the internet to do havoc and think there is no day of reckoning. I read a comment today that said

“so what if the guy, [Paul Elam], could eat kittens and rape children”

and that would not be as bad as a satirical video on spaghetti and meatballs that John Nazarian did over 2 years ago. What kind of people would equate that raping children was OK but satirical videos are not??? I notice the leaders of this group are very careful to pick the words that write to their followers, saying John removed the video from You Tube, they fail to tell their readers that the video is available here, on John’s site and on Vimeo. They encourage their followers to do something called “mirroring” of the video to the point that the copyright cannot be protected or enforce and that this somehow exonerates those that have asked this be done. I have no idea what mirroring is, but it does not sound nice. Further it is my understanding that John removed his videos from You Tube and went to a paid service because of the ads being ran on his You Tube videos. Nothing wrong with anyone choosing to pay for a service that does not show ads before a video starts. So why mislead their own fans/readers/followers. However the video they find of a “criminal nature” is up for them to share the link with their readers so why is this vitriol needed? Why stir people who believe your words into a frenzy of activity that you know is either immoral, unethical or out right libelous? It is not like Paul Elam and Dean Esmay does not know what a satirical video is, they hide behind that all of the time when people try to make them responsible for their actions, so why lie to their fans/readers/followers?

As the readers of this site know from 2007 – 2009 the owners and moderators of this site were targeted in a libel suit. Bloggers went to jail, hard drives were imaged, and yet Rose Speaks.com remained calm, shared ALL of court documents, even those that made the owners come under scrutiny. We promised to do that before we were dragged into that lawsuit and we stayed true to the end of that lawsuit. So we know all to well what can happen to innocent people who are not trying to get an internet mob riled into hateful frenzies. At that time because we were totally transparent we had millions of readers, I hope that A Voice for Men will update their documents for their fans/readers/followers so everyone knows if they even received an answer to their July 2013 letter. It is hard to have a blog and cover a case with transparency even when you are dragged into that case, however we did that and were the better for being that open.

There is a rule of thumb here in the blog world, “Would you say that to someone’s face, would you swear to that in court or a deposition?” If any of that makes you pause and think then don’t do it. Someone is going to have the money to fight in court and tangle up these people in a nightmare of years of court actions, not to mention contempt of court orders etc. Now that bloggers have the same rights as journalists they also have the same responsibility as journalists. You can’t holler fire in a movie theater and then say it is not your fault the crowds ran over each other or you were just joking. The same goes for careless publications on the internet, NOTHING is anonymous these days and we had to fight long and hard to protect the identity of our posters during that trial from 2007-2009.

Then there is the ongoing rhetoric of fear and false statements that indictments are coming down in Los Angeles. That started in March 2013, then May 2013 and with this final Hacker Claim that the “Security Was Lax” so it is NOT His Fault. (0 downloads) from July 2013. It is easy to do some mild research and see again they are misrepresenting facts to their fans/readers/followers. In California there are two grand juries, one Civil and one Criminal.

The civil grand jury is empaneled for a year beginning July 1st of every year.

The civil, or “watchdog,” responsibilities of the grand jury encompass the examination of all aspects of the county government, including special districts, to ensure that the county is being governed honestly and efficiently and that county monies are being handled appropriately. The Grand Jury is mandated by law to inquire into the condition and management of public jails.

…Any private citizen, county official, or county employee may present a complaint in writing to the Civil Grand Jury. The Civil Grand Jury limits its investigations to possible felonies and to charges of malfeasance (wrong doing) or misfeasance (doing a lawful act in an unlawful manner) by public officials. Any request for an investigation must include detailed evidence supporting the complaint. If the grand jurors believe that the evidence submitted is sufficient, a detailed investigation will be held.

…Communications from the public can provide valuable information to the Civil Grand Jury. If the Civil Grand Jury determines that a matter drawn to its attention is within the legally permissible scope of its investigative powers and would warrant further inquiry, the Civil Grand Jury may request additional information. If a matter does not fall within the Civil Grand Jury’s investigative authority, or the Civil Grand Jury determines not to further investigate a complaint, no action will be taken and there will be no further contact by the Civil Grand Jury.

…The Grand Jury has no jurisdiction or authority to investigate federal agencies, state agencies, or the courts. The jurisdiction of the Civil Grand Jury is limited by statute and includes the following:

Inquiry into all public offenses committed or triable within the county and presenting them to the court by indictment.

Consideration of evidence of misconduct against public officials to determine whether to present formal accusations requesting their removal from office.

The inquiry into the condition and management of public prisons with in the county.

Well that could investigate “perhaps” the judicial branch the above letter under the guise of “misconduct against public officials”. The letter lists a long group of people who they claim are violating laws of California, however this grand jury cannot investigate police officers, detectives, private investigators, attorneys, publicists or citizens. So nothing will come of mailing all of this alleged evidence to them. In fact I read the notes from July 2013 of cases submitted and if any of those submitted materials were being held over for the next Civil Grand Jury. There are no cases being held over and those submitted by citizens for the most part was dismissed with no actions because they were out of the scope of the Civil Grand Jury.

Then it must be the Criminal Grand Jury that the letter of allegations are made, let’s look at that.

This selected criminal grand jury will be impaneled throughout the year according to the District Attorney’s needs, and shall have exclusive jurisdiction to return criminal indictments when impaneled.

…In Los Angeles County the Criminal Grand Jury attends hearings to weigh evidence brought by the District Attorney’s Office in order to determine on the basis of this evidence whether certain persons should be charged with crimes and required to stand trial in the Superior Court. The Criminal Grand Jury is an accusatory body and not a trial jury; therefore, the burden of proof is much lower. Specifically, the Criminal Grand Jury must decide if there is a strong suspicion the individual committed the crime alleged.

Under current policy, the Criminal Grand Jury is formed monthly and the term of service should not exceed thirty (30) calendar days.

…The main function of the Criminal Grand Jury is to bring criminal indictments against individuals accused of committing crimes. The District Attorney or the Attorney General presents indictments to the Criminal Grand Jury. A vote of 14 or more Criminal Grand Jurors is required to return an indictment.

Normally, felony cases are presented to a “court of lesser jurisdiction” and the judge determines if there is sufficient evidence to hold a trial. However, under certain circumstances the District Attorney may ask the Criminal Grand Jury to hear special felony cases. The Criminal Grand Jury may hear cases involving prominent public figures in order to prevent prejudicial pretrial publicity, to protect against publicity based on unfounded charges, as well as cases where victims and witnesses need to be protected. The Criminal Grand Jury rarely hears misdemeanor cases.

Additionally, during criminal investigations the District Attorney’s Office may request the assistance of the Criminal Grand Jury to subpoena needed documents or records and to question reluctant witnesses under oath.

…If an indictment is not returned, all records are kept secret and there is no publicity.

There is a lot more of this at the site for L. A. County Civil and Criminal Grand Jury. However it is obvious that the Civil Grand Jury would have closed this out as not within their jurisdiction. The Criminal Grand Jury sits for 30 days at a time and can be held over past the 30 days if they are working or hearing evidence in a case. Certainly this is not the circumstance of the allegations made by Paul Elum and Dean Esmay, so why keep writing articles or posts that “indictments are almost here”. They obviously know these are not true statements.

This group have posted John Nazarian’s private investigator’s license number and Executive Security license number. No problem with that, it is up on John’s site and he must have both licenses to operate in California. However, to ask that people flood the agency with letters of no personal knowledge trying to get John’s license suspended and accusing him and others of “federal crimes include; Civil Rights Violations, Deprivations of Rights under Color of Law, and Honest Services Fraud. A partial list of state violations include; Perjury, Conspiracy, Fraud, Battery, Obstruction of Justice, and quite possibly; Homicide”. These allegations are serious and ludicrous when you look at the people targeted on the list. In my opinion from what we went through what these people are writing would be covered under “Libel with malicious intent”. Not to mention trying to prevent John Nazarian from going about his daily activities necessary to do the job he is hired to do, whether it be surveillance or going through garbage or providing security. I don’t know if John Nazarian would waste his time with these people unless the licensing agencies are being bombarded with clear libel.

That said others targeted by this group or associated groups such as Fathers4Justice include Kate Winslet who has hired legal teams to stop ads being ran against her parenting style in rag mags. The groups says the next to be targeted will include Kim Basinger, Katie Holmes and Halle Berry. If this happens I predict there will be lawsuits in courts in the U. K. for years to come with plenty of money to throw at these activist groups. We have been told that Fathers4Justice is based out of California.

On John’s site he has a clip of a video where Paul Elam and Dean Esmay or suggested that rape victims in college take selfies of themselves to prove they are being raped while laughing at this concept with no thought of the effect on rape victims.

I am sure that Dean Esmay and Paul Elum meant this as satirical comment and not to be taken seriously [wink wink].

John Nazarian intends to have a two hour radio program on February 9, 2014 with a star panel of experts that will address why advocates turn to malicious activists. Be sure you tune in at 7 PM PST.

If any lawsuits are filed in federal courts in the U. S., we will be covering them with papers that can document what is being done in court.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
January 29, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 2 Comments »

The short title for John Nazarian is “security expert.”

Morphing from a private investigator base, John additionally specializes in rectifying dirty deeds stemming from business and love partnership failures. Like most failures; breakdowns and breakups are often precipitated by a single, or series of multiple, dirty deeds. In that regard, John is a dirty deed, excavator. A kind of growly, happy warrior. Not because John loves righting wrongs. He does. But mostly, John likes doing what he does for people who don’t mind writing big checks.

Because John’s a “big check” kind of guy.

I met John Nazarian by telephone after seeing a “rough cut” of DivorceCORP. While not happy with the turn the movie made after James Scurlock departed as director, I was pleased the camera focused on John, who essentially said in ways more colorful than anyone, everything documented on Familylawcourts.com for the past 13 years….until arriving at the big picture, solution. Endfamilycourt.com (Feel free to make a donation, here.)

Seeing the rough cut, I couldn’t help but notice the focus began to narrow on John – because Joe Sorge recognized what every movie must have: The mysterious “It” factor. John has the “It” factor, and likely a high “Q” score.

So I called John to tell him I was happy to see his contribution towards the film. (I think he’d forgotten about it.) He asked what I did (Personal public relations, sometimes for attorneys, sometimes for litigants.) and we had a nice, brief conversation. John was gracious. We said good-bye and went our separate but equal, ways.

It’s Showtime!

When DivorceCORP debuted it was clear John’s role had been further expanded. John became the delightful crux between scorched litigants and the suits and robes trying to explain away their high fees and election funding sources as reasonable.

I appreciated John’s star turn, including his delivery of what had to be the best line of the movie. Artfully and with just the tiniest wisp of a whine, John said,

“I need to put gas in my Rolls Royce”

and drew the biggest laugh of the night. Joe Sorge was smart to use John’s short, humorous takes to capture the divorce and custody industry in a nutshell — and in full. (Which makes me think I should have spent my time honing my comic skills rather than the 13 years documenting the insanity at Familylawcourts.com.)

It became a dark and stormy night.

Then, a dark, strange, turn. John began racking up death threats. The threats underscored how truly crazed some people become during breakups. Business or marital. However, the threats also reinforced of course, the need for guys exactly like John.

I mean, have you seen John?

John J Nazarian at Cemetery

(This photograph was taken of John at one of his favorite places in the world: where America buries her war heroes.)

It’s hard to imagine anyone dumb enough to make a death threat against a tank. Much less a tank equipped with high-tech everything, and an army of police friends.

That’s just felony stupid.

Much like family court.

The delicious secret – come on – you know there had to be one

After the initial wattage, John and I chatted and discovered mutual friends John trusts. This allowed me a peek over the wall and into the private life of John Nazarian.

Inside the walled garden lives in full measure, the straightforward life of a complicated man. Behind the gruff, underneath the scowls, lives a cook…and gardener! A man who fiercely protects family and friends. Like so many people who previously worked in law enforcement (myself included) John understands the entire, sometimes ugly, face of human nature. I suppose it helps that while in law enforcement in San Francisco, John first came out as gay, just prior to the AIDS epidemic.

However, after John lost so many of his friends he had to get out. Literally. For his emotional well-being John recognized he had to leave San Francisco. So John left what was left of his friends, and moved to LA. However, while the money was better, clearly not every private investigator can command John’s rate.

Because it follows that those who understand human nature are much better equipped to right wrongs. That’s the reason behind John’s success.

Having seen the dark side from early on (John was adopted) John limits his emotional investments to his very tight circle of family, employees, and trusted friends.

Best for last!

John is also an expert in something any number of his clients lack. Love.

The proof is Hollywood delicious, and comes with a twist. Actually, a great twist.

Both of John’s adopted sons (did I mention John adopted the boys decades before…oh, everyone?)

Back to the twist. John’s earned his wealth from addressing the hateful acts of others.

But he lives in love.

Now for the twist. John’s adopted boys grew up to be fine men. And John is now a grandfather to two more little boys. Both named after him.

How many parents can make that claim?

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Bonnie Russell of Family law Courts.com
January 20, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on DivorceCORP – behind the scenes

Francis Coyote Shivers and Pauley Perrette in happier days

After being busted AGAIN for violating a restraining Order last spring in March, I decided to let my fingers do the walking and find out if the Coyote is in jail yet. Sadly to say it appears no one in Hollywood goes to jail.

However, during my fingers doing some walking I found where the Coyote had conned a group to do his dirty work for him. Yeppers a men’s group from the Lone Star Great State of Texas, sorry about that y’all!!

The Coyote has been a busy little beaver; married again to a very very young woman with you guessed it… MONEY!!! If the Coyote could con woman after woman all with money then how very easy to con a group that wants to give him a voice. I could almost feel sorry for them, but they should have done some background research before allowing this coyote to use them.

These people seem NOT to believe in restraining orders, that allegations of abuse are always lies from women, in fact they believe it is the men who are abused. Yes that kind of group. Poor poor Coyote, they are taking up his cause and filed what looked like a letter about sending legal advice and suggestions to California from Texas… I bet the people in California got a good laugh about that, Texas trying to tell anyone how to run their court systems.

I regress here; back to the story of the Coyote, seems TMZ was there to snap the pictures, several pictures of Coyote and his new wife as she bailed him out of jail in March 2013 AND he got face time on TMZ… what wannabes will do for that high of scrolling through the internet and seeing a picture of themselves.

In that respect the little coyote has been a busy little guy. I was only able to find one interview given by Ms. Perrette and it was way back in 2006, nothing since. Interesting how many alias Coyote has, including Paul Edwards and Frank Keber, a busy coyote or a hiding coyote.

The same journalist wrote an updated article this past March, no interview or even a comment from representatives of Pauley Perrette. However, Francis “Coyote” Shivers posed for pictures, told the press or TMZ where he was being booked and after his new young wife posted bail, gave interviews to anyone who would listen about how wrong he had been done. I know you feel about now you need a shower.

If Coyote’s cheerleaders are to be believed everyone who said Coyote CAME into the restaurant and started a verbal altercation with Ms. Perrette and her dinner guest ALL would be lying. The police, who were called, showed up and promptly arrested Coyote, ALL lying. The Los Angeles Threat Management detectives, all highly trained, ALL lying. You get to lawyers her ex-private investigator that caught the coyote red handed, you got it, ALL lying. The attorneys and prosecutors, again ALL lying, and the best part, current sitting judges and retired judges involved in this case, ALL lying.

The cheerleaders say indictments for Ms. Perrette, police persons, detectives, attorneys, and judges are all coming from a grand jury in Los Angeles because of letters this group wrote, NOT GOING to HAPPEN. I would love to read the responses this group received but alas those are not posted, just their guns blazing letter to everyone and anyone with a title from local to state to federal offices in Los Angeles and California. They were all blitzed with letters demanding investigations, responses, and charges filed. Then you get to the media that coyote says are in cahoots with Perrette and they are ALL lying unless they speak his truth!!!

Let’s say for a minute that you believed the Coyote’s allegations against his ex-wife, why oh why would he walk into a restaurant, see her and not turn around and walk out??? Oh right, everyone there ALL lying… This would not even sale in the land called Hollywood.

Then there is the video that proves that Perrette’s ex-private investigator is, OH YES, a criminal and it has been saved because they are sure it will disappear off of the internet. Well folks here it is with a disclaimer on the You Tube page that this video is for entertainment purposes only and was done for a “pitch” back in 2012, something they left off when they put it up with their allegations of the big bad PI who is a criminal…. Give me a break…

Yes it is John J Nazarian with his sarcasm and dry humor, the same things that made him the person most people could remember from Divorce Corp. That has to really miff the coyote and his cheerleaders.

Why is Francis “Coyote” Shivers, a Canadian even in our country this long? He is married to a Brazilian woman, he no longer is married to any American citizen. He has been convicted of stalking and a restraining order stays in place and has to be renewed when it is about to run out. It appears from his IMDb page that he has earned no money, therefore paid no taxes in the U. S. So why isn’t he being told to pack up his coyote bag and move along? Why are the good citizens of California paying for this guy to appear in their courts?

Fact check here, there is 20%-25% of men who are abused and/or stalked, but there are 70% of women who are abused, stalked and sadly sometimes killed by men they are or were in a relationship with.

wile e. coyote-malcontentIn closing, it appears no one goes to jail or is deported to their homeland in Hollywood. My advice, if asked, keep getting those restraining orders renewed and when this slime ball gets anywhere near you RUN don’t walk to the nearest police officer. A long history of doing this over and over again to different women is nothing to ignore! You have to feel a tad badly for the young woman he is currently married to and wonder if the clock is ticking for her??? Never fear if she needs support in the future his two previous victims have large shoulders and will let her cry on them and understand what and why she is trying to get people to believe her.

This is my editorial opinion of when a coyote goes bad!

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
January 14, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 9 Comments »

JonBenet Ramsey murdered in 1996

On either CNN or AJA I saw an interview with a man, assumed a previous boulder detective. In that interview he said that a new grand jury should be convened and that Burke Ramsey should be made to testify about what he knew about what happened in the early morning hours of Dec. 26, 1996 with his parents. Have any of you seen that interview and if so do you remember who it was, it was a dark haired man, and what channel it was on?

After that and the statement issued by L. Lin Wood I found this in a news source this morning:

“Among the witnesses who had gone before the Grand Jury were the Ramseys’ housekeeper, the best friend with whom they’d spent Christmas, and her brother Burke. There had been handwriting and DNA testimony. (John and Patsy Ramsey were never called to testify.) But in the end, Hunter had decided it wasn’t enough to prosecute JonBenet’s parents for her death.”

Which brings up the question what could Burke Ramsey remember now 16 years later?

When we asked attorney L. Lin Wood about this he had heard of the interview I referred to but had not seen it. He sent us the same statement that he has issued throughout the weekend.

“The documents released today validate John Ramsey’s position that the Boulder District Attorney should release the entire grand jury record and not just 4 pages from an 18-month investigation that produced volumes of testimony and exhibits. The grand jury’s true bills on Counts 4(a) and 7 are nonsensical. They reveal nothing about the evidence reviewed by the grand jury and are clearly the result of a confused and compromised process. The Ramsey Family and the public are entitled to the benefit of the full and complete record, not just a historical footnote. Fairness dictates that result.”

“It is also extremely important to keep in mind that the released documents from 1999 were the product of a grand jury that did not have the benefit of the conclusive 2008 DNA testing that led to the unequivocal, public exoneration of the Ramsey Family by the Boulder District Attorney. That DNA evidence also established that in 1999, the Boulder District Attorney rightfully refused to pursue criminal charges against John or Patsy, despite the Grand Jury true bills.”

Here is the two page indictment for you to read:

Computer “Hacker” Claim that the “Security Was Lax” so it is NOT His Fault faces 70 years in Prison if Convicted. (0 downloads)

Do you think Mr. Wood has a strong argument that this indictment in 1999 basically means nothing after the DNA tests in 2008? Do you think this case will ever be solved? What do you feel and think that once again John Ramsey has been thrown into the public arena?

Talk to us on our Face Book page where this story will appear!

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
October 28, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on Should New Grand Jury be Convened in the JonBenet Ramsey Murder Case?

George Zimmerman on trial for the murder of Trayvon Martin

If I did an article today on last week’s trial coverage I would be hammering home about an older male white attorney, Dan West, picking on a younger multicultural African-American young woman, Rachel Jeantel. If I got she didn’t want any part of this and she at 19 lives in a multicultural community in Miami one has to wonder if Geroge Zimmerman’s attorney didn’t turn off every one of the mothers on the jury. Surely we have got past the cookie cutter philosophy of if “she is not like me then she doesn’t belong”, or perhaps we haven’t. And what was the celebratory ice cream with his two white daughters of “I got her good” posted on intragram and twitter all about???? This is a young girl who lied and said she was 16 instead of 18 so the news could not hound her every movement in the last year….. GOOD for her for being that smart. She didn’t want to see the dead body of a boy, Trayvon Martin, she was talking to on the phone right before he died, not surprising. She wanted no part of this, but she came forward, RELUCTANTLY, and held her own with an uppity white male older attorney, insulting her at every turn, GREAT for her!!! He never shook her from the core basics no matter how insulting Dan West became in his 4+ hours of trying to break her. She speaks three languages, Creole, Spanish and English, hello that should have been a “great for you”, that is impressive at 19, instead of embarrassing her with “can you read cursive by putting a letter in front of her”.

You see that is all I concentrated on this week, and the more I thought of it the madder I got, this white guy, Dan West, treated her like dog poop on his shoes where the white guy, John Guy, was treated with the statement of “I bet you wish you were not here”. Hell why not that same courtesy by the defense attorney, Dan West, to the young African-American girl, bad manners or racism? What do you think?

We have all of the court documents, the audio files and video files up to date for you to download and enjoy in our download section.

If you want to write an article or editorial opinion about this case we would welcome it, just send it to us and we will put it up.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
June 30, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on Murder Trial of Trayvon Martin Defendant George Zimmerman

Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith