When I look at this picture of Anna Nicole Smith, her son, Daniel Wayne Smith and her lover lawyer Howard K. Stern entering the U. S. Supreme Court five years ago, February 2006, little did anyone know what would happen during the next five years.

Anna Nicole Smith was pregnant with her daughter Dannielynn and the world looked bright, especially in June 2006 when the U. S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Smith had a right to have her appeal sent back to the lower court to decide if she was entitled to any of her deceased husband’s, J. Howard Marshall’s Estate valued over one billion dollars.

Now five years later, once again Howard K. Stern returns to the Supreme Court to hear arguments on Tuesday, January 18, 2011 to address whether Smith’s Estate is entitled to part of the Estate of a deceased husband’s estates which has now been tangled up in court for 15 years. Howard K. Stern returns alone, unless Dannielynn’s father decides to attend with Stern, to see if Smith’s lone heir gets money.

In the last five years, Pierce Marshall has died, Daniel Wayne Smith has died, Anna Nicole Smith has died and John M. O’Quinn died in an accident. Howard K. Stern faced potential career ending charges and a trial to funneling drugs to a “known addict”. Stern was cleared of that on January 6, 2011 by Los Angeles Judge Robert Perry of all charges and his life was given back intact for him to continue to practice law.

On January 10, 2011 Stern filed the Reply to Elaine Marshall’s, Pierce Marshall’s widow, Response dated December 13, 2010, to the Estate of Smith’s Writ of Certiorari filed November 12 2010 with the Supreme Court once again ruling they will hear oral arguments this coming Tuesday and again decide this mega million dollar estate. Any decision by the U. S. Supreme Court will be issued no later than the last Monday of June 2011.

You have to feel a tad sad for Stern to be returning five years later, minus so many important people in his life including the love of his life Smith and her son Daniel.

The attorneys for the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith consists of; Philip W. Boesch Jr. Esq., The Boesch Law Group, Bruce S. Ross, Vivian L. Thoreen, Holland & Knight LLP, Kent L. Richland, Alan Diamond, Edward L. Xanders, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richaland LLP

The attorneys for Elaine Marshall consists of; Roy T. Englert Jr., of Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untreiner and Sauber LLP as well as G. Erin Brunstad Jr., Collin O’Connor Undell, and Matthew J. Delude of Deschert LLP

There has been seven Ameicus Briefs filed by interested groups including the U. S. government, some in favor of Smith’s Estate and some in favor of Marshall.

Here is a list of the other papers filed so you can become acquainted with them to discuss prior to the hearing this Tuesday. The U. S. Supreme Court has three cases it is hearing oral arguments on with this one listed as the last of the three to be heard that day.

November 15, 2010 Ameicus Brief by Legal Professors in Support of Howard K. Stern. The legal professors and lawyers listed are Richard AAron, Laura Bartell, Jagdeep S. Bhandari, Susan Block-Lieb, Robert D’Agostino, Jackie Gardina, Ingrid Hillinger, George W. Kuney, Lois Lupica, C. Scott Pryor, Keith Sharfman, Michael D. Sousa, and Robert M. Ziman.

November 19, 2010 Amercus Brief by. the Bankruptcy Trustees in Support of Howard K. Stern.

November 2010 Ameicus Brief by the United States of America in Support of Howard K. Stern..

December 20, 2010 Ameicus Brief by the National Black Chamber of Commerce in Support of Elaine Marshall.

December 20, 2010 Ameicus Brief by by Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Elaine Marshall.

December 2010 Ameicus Brief by the Center Rule of Law in Support of Elaine Marshall.

December 2010 Ameicus Brief by Legal Professors in Support of Elaine Marshall. The law professors are; S. Todd Brown, G. Marcus Cole, Ronald D. Rotunda, and Todd J. Zywicki

The Three Points the U. S. Supreme Court has decided to hear oral arguments and issue an Opinion on three questions asked to be addressed by Smith’s Estate:

1. Whether the Ninth Circuit opinion, which renders §157(b)(2)(C) surplusage in
light of §157(b)(2)(B), contravenes Congress’ intent in enacting §157(b)(2)(C).

2. Whether Congress may, under Articles I and III, constitutionally authorize core
jurisdiction over debtors’ compulsory counterclaims to proofs of claim.

3. Whether the Ninth Circuit misapplied Marathon and Katchen and contravened this Court’s post-Marathon precedent, creating a circuit split in the process, by holding that Congress cannot constitutionally authorize non-Article III bankruptcy judges to enter final judgment on all compulsory counterclaims to proofs of claim.

I wonder if the Marshall money, like the Hope Diamond is going to be surrounded of the mystic of tragedy attached to it, what do you think?

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to be a guest writer, please send up what you propose to write about via the Contact Us link as well.

©Rose Turner
January 15, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Alan Diamond, Ameicus Briefs, Amicus Curiae, Amicus Curiae Brief, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith and Howard K. Stern, Anna Nicole Smith was pregnant, Bankruptcy Trustees, Beverly Hills, Bruce S. Ross, C. Scott Pryor, Celebrity Trials, Center Rule of Law, compulsory counterclaims, core bankruptcy function, core jurisdiction, Daniel Smith, Daniel Wayne Smith, Dannielynn, de novo review, deceased husband, E. Pierce Marshall, Edward L. Xanders, Edwin Hunter Esq. crime-fraud exception, Elaine Marshall, Englert, Famed Berverly Hills P. I. John J. Nazarian, funneling drugs to a “known addict”, G. Marcus Cole, George W. Kuney, Greines Martin Stein & Richaland LLP, High Profile Trials, Holland & Knight LLP, Hollywood, Howard K Stern, Ingrid Hillinger, J. Howard Marshall, J. Howard Marshall’s Estate, Jackie Gardina, Jagdeep S. Bhandari, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., John O'Quinn, Judge Robert Perry, Keith Sharfman, Kent L. Richland, last Monday of June 2011, Laura Bartell, Legal Professors support Marshall, Legal Professors support Stern, Lois Lupica, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Judge Robert Perry, mega million dollar estate, Michael D. Sousa, National Black Chamber of Commerce, Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal, Ninth Circuit opinion, non-Article III bankruptcy judges, of Robbins, Orseck, Philip W. Boesch Jr. Esq., Pierce Marshall, Richard AAron, Robbins Russell Englert Orseck Untreiner and Sauber LLP, Robert D'Agostino, Robert M. Ziman, Ronald D. Rotunda, Roy T. Englert Jr., Russell, S. Todd Brown, Susan Block-Lieb, The Boesch Law Group, The Center Rule of Law, The Hope Diamond, The Hope Diamond Curse, The Marshall Money Curse, Todd J. Zywicki, U. S. Supreme Court, United States of America, Untreiner and Sauber LLP, Virgie Arthur, Vivian L. Thoreen, Washington Legal Foundation, Writ of Certiorari

Per the Beverly Hills Courier Paper, Attorney Bruce S. Ross, representing estate administrator Howard K. Stern, told Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell L. Beckloff during a status conference that a hearing will be held Jan. 6 regarding his client’s October criminal conviction on charges he helped supply Smith with painkillers and other drugs before her overdose death.

Less than two weeks later, oral arguments are scheduled before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding a federal appeals court decision that Smith’s estate has no claim on the fortune left by her late oil billionaire husband, J. Howard Marshall, Ross said.

Beckloff scheduled the next estate hearing for Feb. 15.

Lawyers for Smith’s 4-year-old daughter Dannielynn Birkhead, who was named her sole heir, and E. Pierce Marshall’s widow, Elaine, will be making their case before the high court Jan. 18, Ross said.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL

©Rose Turner
December 15, 2010.
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author..

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith’s Daughter, Beverly Hills, Beverly Hills Courier, Bruce S. Ross, Bruce S. Ross Esq., Celebrity Trials, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Dannielynn Heads to U. S. Supreme Court, Defense attorney Chris Smith Esq., Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, E. Pierce Marshall, Elaine Marshall, estate administrator, February 15 2011, High Profile Trials, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Christopher Smith Esq., J. Howard Marshall, January 18 2011, Judge Mitchell L. Beckloff, Los Angeles Superior Court, Steve Sadow Esq., U. S. Supreme Court

In filings today with the Ninth Court of Federal Appeals the Estate for Anna Nicole Smith = Dannielynn, filed for a Rehearing and/or a Rehearing En Banc [full court]. The filing points out that the same three judge panel is what propel this case to the U. S. Supreme Court of which Anna Nicole Smith won in a 9-1 decision in May 2006. Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate asked for an Extension to file this Request for Rehearing on March 26.

I predicted after the attorney, Kent L. Richland, for the Estate said they were looking at a return to the U. S. Supreme Court that we would be going for round two and here we are. This will take some time because Elaine Marshall on behalf of the Estate for Pierce Marshall, Smith’s long time adversary – enemy will file to a Response to deny any rehearing, the ninth circuit court will make it’s decision but look for it to end up back in the U. S. Supreme Court for round two. There is just way too much money at stake for either side to walk away from.

NEW PAPERS IN SOUTH CAROLINA FEDERAL COURT IN THE ESTATE OF ANNA NICOLE SMITH VS. G. BEN THOMPSON AND FORD SHELLEY.

April 5, 2010 Court Order appointing G. Ben Thompson as a Pro Se Defendant in the South Carolina Federal Court.

NEW PAPERS IN HARRIS COUNTY 80TH DISTRICT COURT IN VIRGIE ARTHUR VS. HOWARD K. STERN, TMZ.COM, HARVEY LEVIN, LARRY BIRKHEAD ET AL. IN HOUSTON TEXAS.

April 6, 2010 Parties Partially Agreed Motion to Continuance of the Deadlines in the 80th District Court Harris County.

April 6, 2010 Notice of Docket Submission for April 19, 2010 for the Partially Agreed Motion for Continuance.

April 7, 2010 Notice of Associated Counsel by TMZ.com and Harvey Levin.

April 7, 2010 Proposed Docket Control Order.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
April 8, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith Heir, Anna Nicole Smith's daughter, Anna Nicole Smith's Estate, Anna Nicole Smith's Will, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, Bruce S. Ross Esq., CBS-ET, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Dannielynn, Elaine Marshall, Entertainment Tonight, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, Kent L. Richiand Esq., Kent L. Richland, Kent Richiand, Kent Richland Esq., L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Neil McCabe, Philip W. Boesch Jr. Esq., Pierce Marshall, Pierce Marshall Estate, Rehearing En Banc, Rose Turner, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, U. S. Ninth Court of Appeals, U. S. Supreme Court, Virgie Arthur

On March 22, 2010 Elaine Marshall the Executor of Pierce Marshall’s Estate filed a notice of change of firm name for her lawyers.

Not surprising on March 24, 2010 Howard K. Stern, the Executor of Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate, filed an Unopposed Motion to extend time to file petition for rehearing until April 9, 2010 at 11:59 P. M. In the Unopposed Motion Stern states that the filing will not just be for a rehearing but in fact a Motion for Rehearing En Banc.

Can we say this is the expected round two of Elaine vs. Dannielynn in the U. S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals? Do you think the rehearing will be granted? Do you think the U. S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will grant one of the rare En Banc (full court) rehearing? Is this suit headed back to the U. S. Supreme Court as one of the lawyers for Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate is hinting at?

In a statement on March 22, 2010 Kent Richland, a lawyer for Smith’s estate vowed to appeal the latest ruling, possibly to the Supreme Court on different issues than those it first considered. “It really is a unique decision,” Richland said. “We have to take it farther.”

The Estate’s lawyers have asked for an extension from the current due date of April 2, 2010 to file a Motion for Rehearing until the new date of April 10, 2010, stating that the Estate “has not found any other Appellate Court has issued any Opinion has ever so held or otherwise construed the power of a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment so restrictively. This issue would thus appear to be of first impression”.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
March 24, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Alan Diamond Esq., Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate, Bruce S. Ross Esq., Celebrity Trials, Dannielynn, Debunking the myths on ALL cases related to Anna Nicole, Edward L. Xaznders Esq., Elaine Marshall, Eric Brunstad Esq., Estate of Anna Nicole smith, Estate of E. Pierce Marshall, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, Kent Richland Esq., Philip W. Boesch Jr. Esq., Pierce Marshall, Pierce Marshall’s Estate, Rehearing En Banc, U. S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, U. S. Supreme Court

If you can’t get a reality show past the initial filming before it is rejected with a beautiful daughter like Dannielynn Birkhead then something is wrong in Hollyweird. Have you looked at the reality shows coming out this summer? Some of them are horrible and I click past them as fast as I can.

However it does look like Dannielynn is doing a few cameo appearances in such reality shows as Tori Spelling’s daughter first birthday party where the gift bags were rumored to be worth about $2,500.00, wonder what goodies Dannielynn carried home?

There is also the news that her daddy, Larry Birkhead was recently dancing the night away with Paris Hilton at the Playboy Mansion. Hey perhaps they can do a reality show together, two cameo appearances rolled into a dynamite duo for a reality show? However if the gay rumors are true and they are flying again in Hollyweird then Paris might not be Dannielynn’s daddy’s type. Don’t get me wrong I know some great gay parents, look at Clay Akiens he made short work of announcing he was a gay dad and loved being a parent.

With that lead in let’s get on to the newest papers filed in regards to the Texas State District Court cases. The first two are older documents we just found and scanned to put up on the site.

November 13, 2008 Art Harris and Bonnie Stern’s Bench Brief in Support of their Special Appearance to Object to Personal Jurisdiction of the Texas District Court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2107.

November 13, 2008 Art Harris Supplemental Affidavit filed with the Bench Brief on personal jurisdiction in the Harris County District Court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2108.

June 1, 2009 Court Order from the 280th Court granting Rose Turner’s Motion to allow counsel to withdraw.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2091.

June 2, 2009 Art Harris – CBS- Exhibit E part 1 filed with Objection to Rose Turner’s Amended Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties. This is part 1 of 2 of the May 8, 2009 hearing before Judge Tony Lindsay.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2092.

June 2, 2009 Art Harris – CBS- Exhibit E part 2 filed with Objection to Rose Turner’s Amended Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties. This is part 2 of 2 of the May 8, 2009 hearing before Judge Tony Lindsay.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2093.

June 3, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Amended Hearing Notice that the Motion for Contempt on Teresa Stephens had been reset to June 12, 2009 at 9:00 AM.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2094.

June 3, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Response to the Appeals Court in regards to Howard K. Stern’s Motion for Writ of Mandamus.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2095.

June 3, 2009 Harvey Levin and TMZ Objection to Rose Turners Amended Motion for Leave to Designate Third Parties.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2096.

June 4, 2009 Howard K. Stern’s Response to Virgie Arthur’s Objection to Luke Lantta and Lin Wood to appear Pro Hac Vice before the Appeals Court in Texas.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2097.

June 4, 2009 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibit A – D filed with his Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Objection to Luke Lantta and Lin Wood to have Pro Hac Vice status in front of the Appeals Court on the Writ of Mandamus Motion.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2102.

June 4, 2009 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibits E filed with his Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Objection to Luke Lantta and Lin Wood to have Pro Hac Vice status in front of the Appeals Court on the Writ of Mandamus Motion.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2111.

June 4, 2009 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibits F – I filed with his Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Objection to Luke Lantta and Lin Wood to have Pro Hac Vice status in front of the Appeals Court on the Writ of Mandamus Motion.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2110.

June 5, 2009 Art Harris Supplemental Objection to Rose Turner’s Amended Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2098.

June 8, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Motion to Compel Production from Larry Birkhead and to extend the Court’s Special Master, Craig Ball, and Order Ball to image Birkhead’s computer.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2099.

June 8, 2009 Notice of Hearing for June 19, 2009 at 9:00 AM on the Arthur Motion to Compel Production from Larry Birkhead and to extend the Order of the Special Master to image Birkhead’s computer.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2100.

June 8, 2009 Defendant Nelda “Rose” Turner’s Second Amended Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties, including CBS, Larry Birkhead, TMZ, Harvey Levin, Art Harris, Howard K. Stern, as well as the alleged confessed conspirators, Yvonne Waddle, Chrystal Baker, Allison Dillman and Kimberly Ramos.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2117.

The Texas Civil Procedures 33.00 about adding Designated Third Parties.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2109.

June 9, 2009 Virgie Arthur and Bonnie Stern’s Joint Status Report to the California Bankruptcy Court in which Arthur claims she will have 100 exhibits and 12+ witnesses at the California Trial, that Arthur will be ready for trial in 18 months and trial will last 10-14 days. Stern says that she has not received the documentation per the Rules of the Court, she will have less than 20 exhibits and only 3 to 4 witnesses and the trial will last less than 2 days.

June 10, 2009 Court Order from the Florida Southern District granting request to have the July 7 hearing closed to the public and held “under seal”.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2119.

June 10, 2009 Florida Court Order sealing all documents to be filed prior to the July 7 hearing.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2120.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2101.

June 10, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Leave to file a Supplemental Response to Howard K. Stern’s Motion for Writ of Mandamus before the Appeals Court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2103.

June 10, 2009 Virgie Arthur Exhibit B filed with her Motion for Leave to file a Supplemental Response to Howard K. Stern’s Motion for a Writ of Mandamus.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2104.

June 10, 2009 Howard K. Stern’s Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Response filed in regards to Stern’s Motion for a Writ of Mandamus pending before the Appeals Court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2105.

June 11, 2009 Lyndal Harrington’s Notice of Limited Appearance for her July 2, 2009 hearing for Show Cause as to why she should not be found in Contempt of Court again and jailed in the Harris County jail.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2106.

June 12, 2009 Defendant Nelda “Rose Turner’s Notice of Submission to the Court to be docketed on the Submission only docket for July 6, of the June 8, 2009 filing of the Second Amended Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2118.

June 12, 2009 Defendant Bonnie Stern Response to Special Master, Craig Ball’s report suggesting she intentionally deleted and scrubbed hard drives, she addresses it in whole and attaches both of Scott Bly’s Declarations.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2112.

June 12, 2009 Defendant Bonnie Stern’s Declaration submitted with her Response to Special Master Craig Ball’s Report and attaches exhibits to support her Response filed with the Court in regard to Craig Ball’s Report.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2113.

June 12, 2009 Defendant Bonnie’s Stern Exhibit 3 filed with her Response to Craig Ball’s Report to the Court. Exhibits 1 and 2 are Scott Bly’s Declaration, Exhibit 3 is an email from McCabe to Craig Ball on May 27, 2009 saying that the court and him had decided on May 22, 2009 that McCabe would pay to have Bonnie Stern’s computers imaged in California and not have to send them to Texas, Stern claims McCabe had never advised her of that before in any emails.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2114.

June 12, 2009 Defendant Bonnie Stern’s Exhibit 4 filed with her Response to Craig Ball’s Report to the Court, these are emails previously sent to the Court on May 19, 2009 with the filing of Answer to Show Cause before the Court on May 22, 2009.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2115.

June 12, 2009 Howard K. Stern’s Response to Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Leave to Supplement her Response to the Appeals Court in her Opposition to Stern’s Motion for a Writ of Mandamus.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2121.

This catches up all of the Texas State Filings we have. We will be catching up all of the other papers in other trials we are covering throughout the weekend. As always thanks for staying with us and flying Rose Speaks.com.

NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FINAL PAPER FILED BY ELAINE MARSHALL

June 12, 2009 Estate of Pierce Marshall via Executrix Elaine Marshall filed the last document allowed before Oral Arguments. This is the Supplemental Reply Brief that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals laid out in the rules regarding Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate vs. Pierce Marshall’s Estate.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2131.

©Rose Turner
June 12, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Chrystal Baker, Clay Akiens, Court Special Master Craig Bal, Crystal Baker, Dannielynn, Diana Marshall, Elaine Marshall, Harvey Levin, Havana, Howard K Stern, James "Jim" McCown, L. Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Paris Hilton, Pierce Marshall Estate, Queen Of VonDonia, QV, Rose Turner, Sweet_Havana, Teresa Stephens, TMZ.com, Tori Spelling, Writ of Mandamus, Yvonne Barnhart Waddle, Yvonne Waddle, Yvonne Waddle Barnhart

We are trying to catch up with the filings we have on multiple cases. The first set is all of the filings from June 2 through June 8 with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals preparing for Oral Arguments on June 25, 2009 at 9:30 AM in Seattle Washington in regards to the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith.

June 2, 2009 Notice of time and date of Oral Arguments in Seattle Washington before the ninth circuit court of appeals.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2085.

June 2, 2009 Notice by Ninth Circuit of Appeals that the filings from the Estate of Anna Nicole smith is on record with instructions as to the number the court needs and how many to send for stamping and distribution.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2086.

June 5, 2009 Notice to all parties that the oral hearing before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has been changed from June 25, 2009 from 1:30 PM to 9:30 AM.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2089.

June 5, 2009 Joint Status Report by the Estate of Pierce Marshall and the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith as to the name of the two attorneys that will do the oral arguments on June 25, before the court. For Elaine Marshall on behalf of the Estate of Pierce Marshall the attorney named is, G. Eric Brunstad, Jr. On behalf of Howard K. Stern on behalf of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith the attorney named is, Kent L. Richland.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2088.

June 5, 2009 New Docket Report that serves as notice to all parties that the oral hearing before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has been changed from June 25, 2009 from 1:30 PM to 9:30 AM.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2087.

June 8, 2009 Notice from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the Judicial Notice presented by Howard K. Stern on behalf of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith on June 1, 2009 will be decided after the Oral Arguments on June 25 before the Court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2090.

We will be adding more documents today as we try to catch up with everything filed in different jurisdictions, as well as other cases we have been following.

©Rose Turner
June 11, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith Estate, Celebrity Trials, Dannielynn, Elaine Marshall, G. Eric Brunstad, Howard K Stern, Kent L. Richland, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pierce Marshall Estate

From Ford Shelley filing to extend all of the deadline and court dates in Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate vs. G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley for the alleged break in, theft and profiting from any alleged stolen items from Horizons taken the day after Anna Nicole Smith died.

The Ninth Circuit of Appeals has confirmed the date and time for oral arguments in from of it in the Anna Nicole Smith Estate vs. the Estate of Pierce Marshall. There has also been two Amici Curia Brief’s filed in support of Elaine Marshall, the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith is to file their answer by June 1.

May 18, 2009 Ford Shelley “First” Request to Extend all deadlines involving the trial of Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate vs. G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley for possession of and allegedly profiting from stolen items from Horizons taken the day after Anna Nicole Smith’s death.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2065.

May 12. 2009 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has set the date of June 25, 2009 and the time at 1:30 PM in Seattle for the Oral Arguments of both Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate as well as the Estate of Pierce Marshall, each side shall have 30 minutes.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2066.

May 12, 2009 the filing of an Amici Curia Brief by Professors of Law in Support of Elaine Marshall the executrix for the Estate of Pierce Marshall.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2067.

May 12, 2009 the filing of an Amici Curia Brief by the Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Elaine Marshall the executrix for the Estate of Pierce Marshall.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2068.

I have also received emails asking me to clarify that Craig Ball the Texas District Court’s Special Master and forensic computer expert is not the same man or company that is Virgie Arthur’s Expert. I can assure you they are not the same man or even company and from what I have read Mr. Ball is the more respected neutral forensic expert in the state of Texas. I am sure being an attorney also helps him when he is appointed a Special Master by courts state wide. You can download the Court Order Quashing the Subpoena linked below to clarify this misunderstanding appearing around the internet for yourself.

April 1, 2009 Court Order Quashing the Subpoena of BKD, LLP computer forensic experts because they have also worked for Virgie Arthur in her cases.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=1908.

The Forum link for comments and a listing of the documents and open for your discussion is below.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/public-forums/showthread.php?tid=62.

May 29, 2009 the Court issued the Extended Dates requested by Ford Shelley on May 18. See our calendar for new dates or download this Court Document.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2069.

NEW FILINGS IN THE TEXAS STATE COURT

May 29, 2009 Arthur’s Motion for Contempt of Court against Teresa Stephens for not complying with the Court’s May 11, 2009 Order to have her computers imaged.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2070.

May 29, 2009 Notice of Contempt Hearing on Teresa Stephens on June 12, 2009 at 9 AM for failing to follow the Court Order of May 11 to have her computer imaged.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2071.

May 29, 2009 Art Harris Request for an Oral Hearing on the Motion to Designate Third Parties that was filed by Nelda “Rose” Turner on May 18, 2009 and is set on the Submission docket for June 15. An Oral Hearing would cause the Motion to have to be rescheduled possibly.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2072.

NEWEST FILINGS IN CALIFORNIA ON JUNE 1, 2009

June 1, 2009 Bonnie Stern’s Answer to Virgie Arthur’s Adversarial suit in the California Bankruptcy Court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2073.

June 1, 2009 Howard K. Stern as the Executor of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filed his Supplemental Brief for Review by the Ninth Circuit Court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2074.

June 1, 2009 Howard K. Stern as the Executor of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filed his Motion to Take Judicial Notice by the Ninth Circuit Court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2075.

©Rose Turner
May 29, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith - Ninth Circuit of Appeals, Anna Nicole Smith Estate, Art Harris, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Craig Ball - forensic computer, Dannielynn, Elaine Marshall, Estate of Pierce Marshall, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, High Profile Trials, Horizons - Bahamas, Howard K Stern, John "Jay" Patton, Judge Tony Lindsay, L. Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Nancy Hamilton, Nicole Jennings Wade, Rose Turner, Stancil "Ford" Shelley, Teresa Stephens