Dr. Drew will be covering the Dr. Conrad Murray trail in the involuntary manslaughter charges in the case of Michael Jackson from gavel to gavel with a one hour show every night Monday – Friday at 9 PM EST – PST and 8 PM CST – MST. Straight Talk with John Nazarian will be covering the trial gavel to gavel Monday – Friday at 4 PM PST – 7 PM EST on live radio. The call in number is 1-818-572-8030 long distance charges to apply or call in using Skype internationally free.
Both will have excellent guest I feel sure.
Now that a jury is seated in the Michael Jackson death trial, with opening statements planned for Tuesday, Dr. Drew made it clear on his show last night that HLN will be covering the case every step of the way, gavel-to-gavel. The focus of the trial: how did the “King of Pop” really die? It’s a question the world has been asking for over two years. A Los Angeles County jury will decide whether Conrad is guilty of involuntary manslaughter. He’s accused of administering a fatal dose of a surgical anaesthetic to Jackson. A couple of Dr. Drew’s guests weighed in with their thoughts on the trial.
Judge Greg Mathis, host of “Judge Mathis,” explained how it’s possible for jurors to be impartial:
“The question is whether they can have a preconceived notion that is balanced and fair. Some folks might look at it and say ‘well I’m not sure, I just don’t know.’ And from what I’m hearing on both sides, eveyone has a point, and so I’m just going to wait and see. In fact, that’s what judges have to do, and so perhaps we have some of the juror candidates also that may have been able to have such a consideration.”
Brian Oxman, a close family friend of the Jackson family for over 24 years, said that it was fishy for Michael to announce a 50-date concert tour a couple months before he died:
“Everyone in this family knew full well, when 50 concerts were announced that this was a serious problem. I got a call from Latoya, who said, ‘Brian, he can’t do 50 concerts, they’re going to kill him!’”
What do you think? At the start of the trial, do you think that Jackson’s death was a conspiracy, or are you, like most jurors, going to wait and see what evidence is shown before making a decision?
Straight Talk with John J. Nazarian will kick off his coverage tonight with an in-depth look at the jury and what they might bring into this case or are any of them coming in their mind made up?
Nazarian’s show for September, 26, 2011, with John J. Nazarian co-host Vee Foster, guests Ken and Rose Turner:
Last night show with Nazarian had an error in it and for some reason you can not hear it her or on Straight Talk. I have downloaded the show because the guests were awesome and took like questions like the experts they are and answered them and with great insight. If we can retrieve the show from yesterday we will add an MP3 plugin to our site and load it for your listening pleasure.
We encourage all of you to join other posters to discuss all of the cases we cover. Diamond Girl runs the community part of the site and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/ I seldom step on the forums that belongs to the members and is in great hands with Diamond Girl and she will be having a robust discussion there that all of you are invited to join
Visit our Download Section and look through and read all of the documents on the cases we cover.
Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.
I am excited to say that Straight Talk with John J Nazarian on Blog Talk Radio will began a daily show discussing the highlights and testimony for that day at 4 PM PDT – 5PM MDT – 6PM CDT and 7PM EDT each show is one half hour; and then the normal one hour show on Sundays at 6PM. The experts commentators that are signing up to discuss the case will not be surpassed by any of HLN coverage. In fact many of them you will see on major networks AFTER APPEARING ON STRAIGHT TALK WITH JOHN J NAZARIAN. Nazarian is going to be the alternative to having to go to Nancy Grace to hear the best of the best on each day and you will get it hours earlier on Straight Talk.
The Great thing for the Rose Speaks readers is that the BTR show with John J Nazarian and his guests will be embedded into Rose Speaks within minutes of completion of each show, as well as the number for YOU to call in questions will appear on Rose Speaks in the morning of each show so all of you have the opportunity to call in and participate
With that said here are the the records on to bring you up to date on Dr. Arnold Klein, his bankruptcy and the fact that everyone is counter suing so many others. The twist and turns on this case give us, I believe, a look into how complicated the Involuntary Manslaughter trial of Dr. Conrad Murray in the death of Michael Jackson.
August 2011 Filings in the Arnold Klein’s Lawsuit of suing a host of people including ex-employees, banks, and the bankruptcy trustee
We encourage all of you to join other posters to discuss all of the cases we cover. Diamond Girl runs the community part of the site and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/ I seldom step on the forums that belongs to the members and is in great hands with Diamond Girl and she will be having a robust discussion there that all of you are invited to join
Visit our Download Section on all cases involving Dr Arnold Klein’s bankruptcy and who he is suing and who is now cross suing him; you can also pick up the downloads on all of the cases involving Michal Jackson in our download section. As well as all documents on the other cases we are following or followed in the past. I will be updating all of the cases involving Michael Jackson throughout this week.
Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.
Dr. Drew recently took a look at the jury selection process for the upcoming Dr. Conrad Murray trial with Judge Greg Mathis, host of “Judge Mathis”, and Jean Casarez, correspondent for Tru TV’s “In Session”. Dr. Drew and his guests examined the jury questionnaire administered to potential jurors to determine whether or not it will ensure impartiality. Dr Drew will be covering the latest in the trial of Dr. Conrad Murray with an hour wrap up on HLN at 9 PM EDT.
Judge Mathis noted:
“Impartial juries are hard to come by with people as famous as Michael. But the good news is you’ll have critics who previously didn’t care for Michael, and then you’ll have fanatics who loved him to death, so it kind of offsets each other.”
Jean Casarez said that Murray’s defense attorney, Edward Chernoff, was extremely worried about stealth jurors who are only interested in making money off of the trial through interviews and book deals. She added:
“It’s interesting the judge said today to all the jurors that they would have to wait 90 days after the trial to accept any type of payment or benefit in regard to this trial and serving on this jury. An interesting thing jurors told right from the get-go.”
What do you think? Will the questionnaire ensure an impartial jury, or should the state use a more rigorous process when picking jurors for the Conrad Murray murder trial?
We encourage all of you to join other posters to discuss all of the cases we cover. Diamond Girl runs the community part of the site and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/ I seldom step on the forums that belongs to the members and is in great hands with Diamond Girl and she will be having a robust discussion there that all of you are invited to join
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor agreed to a motion by prosecutors to exclude six of Jackson’s former doctors — including Dr. Arnold Klein. He must be feeling like he got a get out of jail free card after the latest filings and counter claims in his bankruptcy.
In court papers filed Monday, defense attorneys Edward Chernoff and Nareg Gourjian alleged that Klein “administered frequent intramuscular injections of Demerol to Mr. Jackson for no valid medical purpose,” and that Jackson “became physiologically and psychologically dependent on Demerol.”
“I do not think it is relevant,” Judge Pastor said. Pastor also ruled that the defense could not make any reference to the 2003 search of Jackson’s ranch in Santa Barbara county, saying that it had no bearing on his death. So those drugs and the allegations of needle marks is out for Murray’s defense as well, what a win for the D. A. in this case.
Chernoff argued that the testimony would show that Jackson was “addicted to and withdrawing from Demerol” a factor Chernoff said was “important to our defense” . Judge Pastor said nope, no can do.
Pastor said he would allow testimony from two other doctors, Allen Metzger and David Adams. Murray’s defense team says Jackson asked Metzger in April 2009 to give him an intravenous sedative, a request the physician refused to grant.
Adams meanwhile gave Jackson the anesthetic propofol on four occasions in 2008, after the singer had oral surgery. Jackson also by many accounts used the drug as a sleep aid. Pastor also approved testimony from a nurse who treated Jackson in 2009.
Dr. Murray is facing charges for involuntary homicide in Jackson’s death on June 25, 2009. Murray could face up to four years in prison if convicted.
His defense team is expected to argue that Jackson gave himself an excessive dose of the drug while the doctor was out of the room at the singer’s mansion in the affluent Holmby Hills neighborhood near Los Angeles. The defense has also floated the theory that Jackson committed suicide.
Jury selection will begin on September 8, with opening statements scheduled for September 20 or 27.
We encourage all of you to join other posters to discuss all of the cases we cover. Diamond Girl runs the community part of the site and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/ I seldom step on the forums that belongs to the members and is in great hands with Diamond Girl and she will be having a robust discussion there that all of you are invited to join
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.
This is an unedited, draft entry. Please refer to the MSM (mainstream media) for 100% accuracy. If you are copying and pasting to other web sites before the edit, please be sure to include a link-back to this specific entry and this disclaimer with your copy. Thank you, Sprocket.
Deputy District Attorneys: Deborah Brazil David Walgren
Defense lawyers J. Michael Flannigan Joseph Low Edward Chernoff
#21 Christopher Rogers LA Co coroner Chief forensic medicine. ##22 Dr. Richard Lewis Ruffalo Clinical Anesthesiologist
Christopher Rogers
LA Co coroner. position. Chief forensic medicine. Supervise doctors who work at coroner’s office, and occasionally do autopsies himself.
Manner of death?
Homicide
Homicide based on what?
It was based primarily based on the info we had on the medical care MJ receded. The care was substandard.
Cross by Flanagan.
Now tell me, how do drugs get in to the heart blood?
Well, in this setting, propofol has to be administered intravenously, and so that blood circulates throughout the body.
.
So, an injection? Yes. Iv? Yes. Orally Yes.
But in the event that propofol were taken orally, that’s one way it could appear in the stomach? Yes, that’s a way it could appear in the stomach.
And if this is the hypothetical, of ingestion of propofol by the decedent, and ingestion of lydocaine, by the decedent, this would not be a homicide?
I would think it would still be a homicide. Based on the quality y of the medical of care, I would still consider it a homicide even if the Dr. did not give the propofol…
REDIRECT
Let’s assume that Dr. left him alone with the patient and the patient self administered, (snip; I don’t get the full hypothetical) you would still (rule it a homicide based on the standard of care.)
Yes.
Recross Flanagan
So, even if Dr. Murray gave more than 25 mg between 1040 and 10:50 we still have the same result that MJ would be awake at 11 o’clock?
Yes, assuming there was a single dose.
And that he would also be dead by 11 o’clock? ???
Richard Lewis Ruffalo
Anesthesiologist.
And what’s a clinical pharmacologist? That’s someone who studies drugs and how they are used.
So, he thinks the numbers of the benzodiazapams from the heart blood, he thinks reflect an injection/ingestion of a HIGHER dose than what Dr. Murray states he gave.
To read the rest of the first part of day five and for all of the detailed information as to what Sprocket heard and saw visit Trials and Tribulations.
This is an unedited, draft entry. Please refer to the MSM (mainstream media) for 100% accuracy. If you are copying and pasting to other web sites before the edit, please be sure to include a link-back to this specific entry and this disclaimer with your copy. Thank you, Sprocket.
Focusing on just those that you mentioned, who now become an extreme departure of care.
Yes.
So each individual, when you put them together, it becomes so egregious, that it becomes extreme. That any physician should know should be trained in the basics of life support.
Overall, identified several points of extreme deviation of care.
And addressed the one handed CPR on the bed. “Totally useless.”
One handed behind the back? It’s totally useless. You can’t get enough pressure to push down on the chest. We use that in neonatal. Describes what you should do with an adult in the bed. Describes how you get them out of the bed easily. Even if you claim you can’t move the person from the bed, the proper training would be to protect the head, slide the individual off the bed, and then be able to start chest compression.
Even if they are morbidly obese, you can generally do that…
Cross by Flannigan
45x what it is in the hospital blood. That doesn’t go with your theory.
Yes, I made a mistake.
Now if we have 45x whets in the stomach than what’s in the blood. then we have evidence of oral ingestion.
We may have to check with the coroner, to check with what the numbers mean. Now, it doesn’t make sense unless he ingested it orally.
So, we’re back to it being orally? Well, we’ll have to talk to the coroner.
It’s a big difference isn’t’ it?
I totally agree.
REDIRECT
Assuming self administration as Mr. F included, would any of your opinions change in your standard of care?
No. You don’t walk away from a patient. (explains in detail. Addicts, that is the first tip off, you don’t walk away, just like a heroin addict.)
The people rest their case.
No defense presented except a statement
Judge Pastor: Is the Attorney General present? (did JP ask that? I think they said they were!)
JP said he was ready to rule on that request (from the medical board).
This court has reviewed all the evidence the def motion to dismiss is denied. Appear 2 me of the evidence the offense has been committed, in order Dr Murray be held there for.
Ms. Saunders Medical board.
We’re appearing on behalf of director of the medical board, to provide justice and that as a condition of bail, that the defendant have restrictions on him as a condition of his bail not to be able to practice…
After trial, that this order to this defendant not practice and to show that an order of the safely to the public has been met.
Since the defendant held over, that there are restrictions on his license are in effect we further request that he be prevented from practicing here in California.
Judge Pastor: Increase the bail, court denies the request. Satisfied that the bail presently set, which is three times the presumptive bail (is sufficient (. Certainly recognize posture. court does have the ability to reconsider, I have done so and I am satisfied and shall remain.
This hearing has been a significant hearing as far as presentation and evidence and the rights of the defense to explore evidence presented and to underline the sufficiency of any case. The cross has been extensive probing and vigorous. There is no erroneous issue of a depravity issue.
So as I balance all of these factors under Eldridge and People vs. Ramirez, due process has been afforded Dr. Murray.
Circumstances have changed have changed dramatically, court finds extraordinary mandates to approving the request by the medical board.
So, he’s restricting the license or banning it all together. cites a case the overall consideration of the protection of the public, and I’m satisfied that non intervention at this time, does impose a danger to public safety.
In this case there is a direct nexus and connection between the actions of Dr. Murray, and a homicide. …and the fitness and competence to practice medicine.
In undertaking an issue of restrictions ct recognizes the standard of proof is not simple probable cause, the standard of proof the ct must utilize, there is clear and convincing proof that there is a certainly that sanctions are appropriate.
Immediately cease and desist from practicing in the state of California is now suspended by this court as a condition of bail.
They are to notify the appropriate authorities in other states within the next 24 hours.
Provide represite proof to this court, in the next 24 hours. to any and all licensing agencies where Dr. M holds a license.
Dr. Murray is not to practice in any other jurisdiction, in less he is so license.
Arraignment will be set two weeks from today. January 25th, at 8L30 A. M.
Nothing else?
Sprocket goes into detail, it is a great read and gives more information then what the main stream media has time to give. Be sure to keep up with all of the trials covered by Trials and Tribulation.
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl who is in charge of the community has made it easier to join and be part of the discussion.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our true crime writer, Sprocket, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Please refer to the MSM (mainstream media) for 100% accuracy. If you are copying and pasting to other web sites before the edit, please be sure to include a link-back to this specific entry and this disclaimer with your copy. Thank you, Sprocket.
Deputy District Attorneys: Deborah Brazil David Walgren
Defense lawyers J. Michael Flannigan Joseph Low Edward Chernoff
Witness #17 Stephen J. Marx, computer forensic examiner Witness #18 Tim Lopez Las Vegas specialty pharmacy owner #19 Jaime Lintemoot Senior criminologist. LA co dept of coroner’s office. #20 Orlando Martinez city of LA robbery homicide.
I can’t remember who told me this (I think it was In Session’s correspondent Beth Karas but I’m NOT positive) but one of Dr. Murray’s attorneys is J. Michael Flanagan. Apparently, Flanagan is noted for achieving an acquittal for a defendant in another case involving propofol.
DDA Walgren: We will be calling toxicologists to the stand today or tomorrow. There will be summary report of that finding that will be introduced. No problem from the defense about that.
DDA stipulate that iPhone is the phone recovered on July 28th, 2009. All stipulate.
DDA discussed Marx’ background, employment on July 28th, 2009 Computer forensic examiner in the DEA. Now since retired. Was employed 7-8 years. responsible for extracting computer evidence and present it for evidence (at trial).
DDA Q: Did conduct analysis of this iPhone as related to the unallocated space.
Marx: Yes.
DDA Q: Did you find some screen shots?
Marx: Yes I did.
(Sprocket note: Clerical issue. Walgren restate numbering issue. Goes over the Exhibit numbers and what they are specifically. I check with reporter next to me who believes it was Conrad Murray denying the release of his medical records regarding Michael Jackson.)
DDA Q: (Ms. Brazil direct.) Through questioning, establishes Lopez’ background. Employed as a pharmacist for 15 years. Business owner of Applied Pharmacy Services, located in Las Vegas, Nevada. Describes his duties as owner; clientele is patients that have been directed by a doctor/facility.
Through questioning, DDA establishes that in June (Sprocket note: year illegible may be 2008) received a phone call from Conrad Murray. He identified himself as African American and that most of his patients were African American and that some of these patients suffer from vitaliago. He was asking about bedoquin product, regarding the strength it comes in. Murray was interested in the 20% strength.
DDA Q: Did he ask if you were able to provide medications for his other clinics?
Lopez: Yes. He asked about propofol and saline bags.
Sprocket then goes through the amount of supplies and medicines ordered from Lopez and shipping information including FedEx tracing.
Cross by defense attorney Low.
Q: Is it fair to say as a pharmacist, part of your job is to provide prescription medication to doctors?
Lopez: Yes.
Q: There are a lot of laws and rules and regs your supposed to (comply with)?
Lopez (paraphrasing): Before you [can] be a good pharmacist, is following the rules, is before filling a new prescription, you need to verify the validity … of the license.
To read the rest of the first part of day five and for all of the detailed information as to what Sprocket heard and saw visit Trials and Tribulations.
1/12/11 6:30 am partial edit by Sprocket & bolding to highlight testimony.
This is an unedited, draft entry. Please refer to the MSM (mainstream media) for 100% accuracy. If you are copying and pasting to other web sites before the edit, please be sure to include a link-back to this specific entry and this disclaimer with your copy. Thank you, Sprocket.
JAIME LINTEMOOT
LA co dept of coroner’s office. Senior criminologist. What is a senior criminologist. As a criminologist. my job is to study science as it pertains to the law. How long employed as criminologist? About 9 years.
have received formal education Yes. She describes DS in forensic chem. from Arizona Cal State applied forensic scientists. Board certified in criminalistics
Prior to 2005 office did not have a method to determine propofol (in the body). She did research and established a method to find propofol (in bodies).
She had to find a drug that mimic the drug standard. Do duplication studies. Had to determine recovery, many things that go into establishing this method.
Prepared an 8 page report detailing her findings. Peoples 68.
A laboratory summary report was prepared that detailed all her findings. She specifically handled the propofol. Yes.
Cross by Flanagan.
Why is it different from the femoral blood?
obj calls for speculation.
It is not uncommon for us to have different numbers from femoral blood and heart blood. If going overall level, will rely on femoral blood (vs. heart blood).
Orlando Martinez
Work city of LA robbery homicide. What do you homicide section investigate deaths. 16 years. Since May of 2005
One of lead investigating officers?
Yes.
Were you assigned and working on this case? yes.
Did you make efforts to make contact with the defendant in this case? I did
Was able to make contact on June 29th?
At some point on June 26th, made contact with Michael Penia?
Made arrangements to sit down and meet with the defendant…
Dr. Murray said he received a phone call from Michael Amir Williams requesting to treat him for the tour.
did Dr M tell you that MJ wanted him to accompany him on this London tour? Yes.
Sprocket goes into detail of this detective interview with Dr. Murray about the last night and day of Michael Jackson’s life.
Cross.
Chernoff. You left out a lot in your discussion.
Now talking about the offering a job on the THIS IS IT tour. …do you recall that Dr. Murray told you about a period of time and that MJ called Dr. M in order to obtain a Doctor that would provide MJ with propofol, Dr. David Adams. That other doctor was David Adams.
Sprocket goes into detail about the cross exam of detective Martinez it is a great read and gives more information then what the main stream media has time to give. Be sure to keep up with all of the trials covered by Trials and Tribulation.
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our true crime writer, Sprocket, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
PART ONE EDIT TIMES Friday, January 7, 2011 (notes edited January 7, 2011 by Caligirl9 at 4 p.m.) Correction edit by Sprocket 1/8, 9 p.m.
Deputy District Attorneys: Debrah Brazil David Walgren
Defense lawyers J. Michael Flanigan Joseph Low Edward Chernoff
Witness #12: Detective Dan Myers LAPD detective. Witness # 13 Sade Anding Girlfriend of Dr. Murray Witness #14: Bridgette Morgan Witness #15: Nicole Alvarez Girlfriend of Dr. Murray Witness #16: Elissa Fleak LA County Coroner Investigator
Detective Myers continues
Cross by defense attorney Ed Chernoff
Myers: Sade Anding was one of the people that he talked to and that she was the phone call of 11:51. Yes. Misstates. The call was to Miss Anding, not from.
Direct of Sade Anding from Houston Texas
DDA Q: From that first meeting with Dr. Murray, did you see him with some frequency? (Objection sustained.) When you first meet him did you see him on other occasions? Did Dr. Murray refer to you as his girlfriend? Were you Conrad Murray’s girlfriend?
Anding: Yes.
DDA Q: What time was it your time in Houston [when Dr. Murray called]?
Anding: I know it was 12:30 about. It was in the afternoon yes.
DDA Q: What did he say when he first spoke?
Anding: He told me he it was Conrad; he said “Hi,” and “How are you?”
DDA Q: Did you recognize his voice?
Anding: Yes.
DDA Q: [Referring back to June 25 phone call] So you interrupt Dr. Murray and start chatting about your day and going on in your life?
Anding: Yes
12:06 pm
I’m in the cafeteria, wolfing down my lunch before I do some editing then posting the testimony of the last three witnesses, the last being Nicole Alvarez. I don’t think I’ve heard as many “I don’t recall” answers in my life!
DDA Q: Let’s start with April 2009? Was Dr. Murray living at your residence?
Alvarez: I’m trying to answer accurately. I wouldn’t describe it as permanent residence.
DDA Q: Do you have a son with Dr. Murray?
Alvarez: Yes. Born in March, 2009.
Alvarez knew that Dr. Murray would be going to England. She was invited to go along with him. Doesn’t recall when she was invited.
DDA Q: Were you excited about the trip?
Alvarez: Definitely! Definitely.
The rest covers Alvarez’s testimony about packages deliver to her address and Sprocket take on this witness.
To read the rest of the first part of day four and for all of the detailed information as to what Sprocket heard and saw visit Trials and Tribulations.
PART TWO EDITS AND TIMES January 7, 2011 afternoon session. Edited by Caligirl 9 at 5 p.m. Correction edits by Sprocket 1/8 @ 9 p.m.
Direct of Elissa Fleak
DDA Q Did you document who prescribed?
Fleak: reports diazepam (Valium), Flomax, Lidocaine lotion, lorazepam (Ativan), temazepam (Restoril, a sleep aid) prescribed by Dr. Murray. [ed. note: A cardiologist prescribing a med for prostatic hypertrophy?] Clonazepam (antianxiety), trazodone (antidepressant) by a Dr. Metzger, name missed prescribed by Dr. Klein [ed. note: presume Benoquin as it’s a medication used for vitiligo]
The rest of the coverage of this witness is about photos of Jackson’s rented home and evidence, very worth while reading and visit Trials and Tribulations.
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our true crime writer, Sprocket, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Comments Off 
Entries (RSS)