Posts Tagged “Divorce California Style”

Sheila Williams busy lawyer

NOTE FROM JOHN J NAZARIAN: I have never worked for Ms. Williams office, and dont care if I ever do. Not sure my office is within her budgets. As a matter of fact, she was rep’ing the other side and was a real adversary, ‘she knows her stuff’. Think I am putting you on….go mess with her….and remember this article.

There is a real class act in the Palm Springs area and it is not a Ritz Carlton or a Four Seasons. It is a Sheila A. Williams, Esquire, never in all my years of working in the field of DIVORCE law have I run up against such a presence. You are not going to miss her, trust me, she is engaging, funny and nothing short of incredible, I like Sheila! Oh for sure I have written and talked about many lawyers across the country and especially in the Beverly Hills area, but Palm Springs?

Here is a thought, there is not another divorce lawyer I can imagine in the entire desert community that could come close to the knowledge of Sheila A. Williams, tough. This woman is a one woman wrecking crew. She is as clever and smart as they come. I feel sorry for any lawyer who might think that this gal is going to be easy pickings, you will move forward at your own peril if you do. Don’t be surprised if by some chance you get hit with one of those desert sand storms and your car has no paint and your are standing in your socks! Listen to me, you have been warned, if you go up against Sheila A. Williams she is going to S.A.W. you into pieces and you may not even realize it for several hours after it has been done. Those are her initials…was all this planned?

Sheila’s practice is very nice, above nice, done right — show up for a meeting, she will have a light breakfast for you. If you pick the right day she may even have your car washed! Someone very close to me told me that it was a pleasure to work with her and agrees with me that she is “right on target” constantly. If you retain her you are doing the opposing counsel a dis-service, she is going to ruin each and every day for them and in such a manner that they will wish that you had hired someone else. One more thing, in the desert this “Legal Eagle” has not one competitor, NONE and Sheila knows it. Sheila has such a talent that she has no boundaries, she can do it all. For John J. Nazarian, my son and I liked her the first time she looked over her glasses at me and said, “I want you to stay, have a seat.”

One more interesting fact, could we be looking at a future Superior Court Judge here? This would be just what the judicial district needs, Sheila A. Williams, Esquire.

Don’t be shy, call her, I am going to give you her numbers, office, 1-760-323-8377 or try Sheila on her cell phone, 1-760-219-8923. The office is located at 2122 E. Barristo Road, Palm Springs, Ca. 92262. If you’re getting ready to put the trash out and need a great divorce lawyer to help you, call Sheila A. Williams…tell her please, that your read our comments here on DesperateExes.com.

Follow John J Nazarian On Face Book and on Twitter and see who John J Nazarian is following.

©Straight Talk by John J. Nazarian, Private Investigator
October 3, 2011
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off

Jackie Earle Haley

After a very long vacation from the Stanley Mosk, I returned to my favorite stomping grounds and who do I run into but a face and a name from the past! Jackie Earle Haley, the kid star from a million years ago, he was born in 1961 but why does it seem like, “Years.” Simple he as been around since a cute little kid with shaggy hair and blue eyes…cute is gone but still a great actor and from were I was standing he seemed like a real nice guy. Soft spoken and very low key, he has a real sense of calm about him as does his former love of his life, it is all very calm. You see, it is possible to be reasonable.

Mr. Haley was there with his attorney, Terry Levich Ross, of the firm Silberberg & Ross, this is a lawyer. There is something that is very likable about her, she is firm and keeps a stern look most of the time. Try talking to her and you will find a softer underside…hmm, a little like myself…

…On the other side representing Windy O’Reilly, Mr. Haley’s ex, is none other than Attorney Joseph P. Koenig, with one of the premier firms in the city, Trope and Trope. Joseph always has an air of confidence and for a good reason, he too is relentless and to watch Miss Ross and Mr. Koenig was a little like watching two cobras. Koenig has a friendly air about him but don’t assume you are going to step on him, he too has a great command of the English language. The feeling is that neither trust the other (lawyers), that is perfect for the world of divorce…no one can trust anyone! Mr. Koenig too is on his own and is watching and waiting as is Miss. Ross. Watching and waiting for what you ask, well Mr. Haley and Ms. O’Reilly are sitting and talking and the two are so at peace that I am convinced that they could repeat their vows. The two spoke for what seemed like hours and never once raised their voices. It was refreshing, two reasonable people talking over very personal issues and two highly competent lawyers watching and waiting…in the end, “Hugs, kisses and pats on the back. ” I had to step back and assure myself that I was on the 8th floor at the Stanley Mosk and that this is DIVORCE court.

We should all wish, Mr. Haley and Ms. O’Reilly all the best and they should both be grateful that they had two of the best lawyers in Southern California keeping it all together.

Be sure to read the rest of the article at Desperate Exes.com and browse through any of the articles in the world of Hollywood Divorce you might have missed.

http://desperateexes.com/2011/04/12/stop-the-presses-a-civilized-hollywood-divorce/.

©John J. Nazarian
April 13, 2011
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 3 Comments »

California Minors Counsel

Here is a thought that I have for the California useless P.I. clubs and organizations: why is it that we have “lawyers” aka MINORS COUNSEL being appointed at a pretty decent per hour rate, $125/hour? If you should be so lucky to be appointed and the parties involved are rich and maybe a little famous the sky is the limit…it is absolutely incredible, you can bill your regular hourly rate. Now if you are one of these high dollar lawyer types do you have any idea what that number can be? And for some children who can barely whisper “goo goo gah gah,” this is the truth here and I am shocked that this has not been mentioned before.

There were two cases last year that were nothing short of spectacular for two divorce lawyers who billed tens of thousands on one and hundreds of thousands on the other. Forget about the CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES involved, some of these minors counsel have a great deal of power. They can make decisions and they get to testify for the minor, LMAO in “their” own words…oh my god! And listening to some of these people is terrifying, to the point that I even can tell that they are ‘gilding the lilly’ aka making stuff up and certainly enhancing the work product, my opinion.

What you ask is my complaint? Simple, they are acting as investigators 70 percent of the time and not as lawyers. To the point the other day I sat and listened to someone I had to describe as nothing but a wind bag with a Bar card. And I could tell by his answers to the court there was a “quiver.”…..

….Anyone questioning my clarity on this, all you have to do is go and sit and listen, most of the time they are not acting as lawyers. There is little or no law being dealt with by them, rather jibberish and bullshit with a dam near guarantee to take a big bite out of your financial well being. The other interesting aspect I have seen is when there is a blatant like for one parent or the other and they are supposed to be impartial and to deal with the facts in their INVESTIGATION. I am still sizzling at how about this? These people are speaking for a child that as I have stated that in many cases can’t express themselves. So in making mention of this again, I plan on paying a lot more attention in the weeks and months to come and when I see other MINORS COUNSEL… …I will have their names and dates so that you can pull the record and see for yourselves.

Be sure and sure and visit Desperate Exes.com to read the rest of John J. Nazarian’s thoughts on something that has bugged me for years.

http://desperateexes.com/2011/03/18/minors-counsel-v-private-investigators/.

NOTE FROM ROSE: I quickly called John J. Nazarian to compare notes on this article because it speaks to something near and dear to my heart, children rights. Here in Texas they are called Guardian Ad Litem (but they are lawyers) and often they have themselves promoted to Attorney Ad Litems, via a Motion to the very Court that appointed them as the Guardian Ad Litem. You better believe that the judges listens to them; 1) They answer ONLY to the court that appointed them and 2) they are pretty close to being God in Texas family courts. They swing the case not in the best interest of the child but often to the parent paying them or just the one they “like”. At the end of the day it is about that big paycheck. In the old days in Texas we had “social workers” that reported directly to the judge. They had no legal degree but they did have a Master degree in child and family sociology and for the most part you could not put anything past them and they did care about the children. I have often wonder who came up with this instead, which is only about money to “family lawyers” on a list and never from what I have observed about the children. In my opinion if the court wants the parents or children investigated, hire a P. I. that reports ONLY to the Court, if you want the home environment evaluated hire a social worker that ONLY reports to the Court, get the greedy lawyers out of the child “speak” business. ALL OF THE ABOVE IS COURSE JUST MY OPINION ON WHAT IS REALLY “IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILDREN”.

©John J. Nazarian
March 20, 2011
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off

Charlie Sheen Bree Olsen Brooke Mueller & Natalie Kenly

Hey, I have a great idea, let’s just leave Charlie Sheen alone, enough already. So the guy has had a few bumps in the road…so what? Maybe it is that he expresses himself in a somewhat “outward” fashion. And if “bumps” on the road to success were a crime, we would not have much to watch on the tube! Charlie is a big talent and he knows it as do all those around him…including the best sex money can buy! And again, so what? pretty girls and cute boys have always been in the Hollywood mix…this is happiness that money can buy!

Sure the drugs and hookers, ok… and so what, he is trying to take care of it and it would appear that he is doing the best he can. So what, he buys sex, he is rich and can do as he pleases, it is his money. He does not like AA so maybe he has a point…I found his thoughts on the AA organization interesting. But all of this BS and the attack mode of what seems like the world against this guy is total bullshit. Just let him work through what he has to deal with. What? is the plan to get him to hurt himself, I hope not as much of this is none of anyone’s business. Just leave him alone and get things together.

Here is another reason to leave Mr. Sheen alone, MARTY SINGER. Marty is a friend and one of the best lawyers I think in the country at what he does. And what he does is to assure that people leave him and his clients alone. Can we all agree that Mr. Sheen is clear-minded enough to hire the best legal mind in the country to help him in his affairs?

The last few days of his former wife’s silliness is another issue, who is advising her that she would go to the wrong police department to file her restraining orders? She went to Beverly Hills Police and Charlie does not live in Beverly Hills…duh. Brooke get some competent help or at least someone who knows where the guy your complaining about lives!

…An “emergency restraining order,” ridiculous, outrageous, does “kick the guy when he is down” ring a bell here folks… what was the emergency? “He threatened me.” …The actions of Brooke Mueller in my mind are…

If I was Charlie Sheen I would not worry too much, he has a mega firm backing him in the DIVORCE action, Ron F. Brot and Mark P. Gross of Brot and Gross ( 818-549-0800 ). …Their client looks great in this story and …so let’s see, Marty Singer, Ron Brot and Mark Gross…

Read the rest of the article by John J. Nazarian at Desperate Exes.com. I saw the interview on CNN with Piers Morgan and I agreed with a lot of what Charlie Sheen had to say. He is a mega talent and like most has a mega ego, AND he carries his latest drug test results in his pocket taking a drug test every 48 hours to put a halt to all of this “hysteria”.

http://desperateexes.com/2011/03/02/team-charlie-sheen-winner/.

©John J. Nazarian
March 2, 2011
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 28 Comments »

Super Duper Attorneys for 2011

Already? I rushed to my mailbox for my February issue of LOS ANGELES magazine and got an instant rash, 2011 Southern California Super Lawyers issue! We had our usual laughs and then it got serious, Phillips, Lerner, Lauzon & Jamra…Jamra, did she not so move on? Well if you look at page S-8 you will see the group photo, was that photoshopped? And the space between Sticey Flips and Grace Jamra is big enough to stick Lynn Soodik in, sure like a plug! …Grace Jamra is now Jamra and Jamra, there is no more ‘J’, it is ‘PLL’, as Grace is gone!

…Not to only mention Sticey, but who reads this drivel and hires someone based on being a “Super” anything, I think you should have “Super Dooper,” “Super Biller,” “Super Super Dooper”… My thought here folks is that I wish that I had been the slick SOB who came up with this idea, it is now showing up in other papers, everyone is “Super.” Then we have “top 50? and we have the “top 100,” this is great, how about the “bottom 3.” Or the “worst biller” or the “best biller” (we all know who those are!). Or the best dresser or the worst dresser, the best hair….the worst hair. How about for the men, those who never shine their shoes? Sorrell Trope will always be the best dressed and his shoes…like mirrors, and you won’t find him paying to be called a “Super Lawyer”. And here is the bad news, many of you who are grabbing for this silly title really suck at doing what you do and we all know who you are!

You can read the rest of John J. Nazarian’s take on all things Super in the Divorce land of Hollywood at Desperate Exes.com

http://desperateexes.com/2011/01/26/its-sooper-dooper-time-again/.

©John J. Nazarian
January 27, 2011
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off

John J. Nazarian and Charlee on the job

Alright, here are a few details: “Here’s Daddy,” he is 23, we will call him “Guncile” and we have also have a Mommy, we will call her “Genie.” Guncile and Genie have an eight and ½ month old little girl, fragile right? These two lived for several months in the Beverly Hills area and in the course of “living together” it had all the outward appearances of a reality show that went bad…terribly, awfully, really bad. Now, Mommy’s biggest mistake was not to call the police when Guncile would act the fool, you know, punching holes in walls, breaking the mirrored sliding doors to the closet and crushing Genie’s laptop and screaming. All when under the influence of alcohol…when Guncile is sober he is a relatively delightful little human, but underneath, he would appear to be an immature little jerk who cannot handle alcohol, never mind “scotch and beer.”

Guncile, who proclaims he has no problem with alcohol. was arrested for drunk driving (recently), he wrote of going to visit a “relative” who had died, and placed that note on the windshield to assure that Genie was going to see it…most would consider this utterance a suicide note. He cut his wrist, and got so drunk that while attempting to get into a friend’s apartment he fell to the pavement and was in ICU for a few days, on this occasion Dipshit was beyond drunk and almost killed himself (we have the medical reports, the DUI reports, and photos of the cutting of the wrist, and of the damage in the former love nest). He also carved the little girl’s name into his arm with a knife! Is that not just sweet? This young man has issues and one day they will surface and god help those that may be in his path…

“Our Commissioner” is not understanding any of this, his term is, “Situational“, that being this is behavior that is demonstrated while the two love birds were together. This sounds like one of those “pay a bunch of money and go to a convention and learn” words that will make one look brighter and give little assholes excuses for bad behavior. Also keep in mind much of this nasty behavior was prior to the love birds wrecking their “Love Shack.”

Sure, you have guessed it, Guncile denies ever doing any of this and it is “she,” Genie who did much of this! Well, a little review, Genie was not arrested for DUI, Genie did not almost fall to her death while so stinkin drunk, Genie did not cut her wrist, Genie attends USC and works part time. (Funny thought just came to me, too bad this commissioner is not in the criminal courts, there would be no one in jail as is this “SITUATIONAL” issue would be perfect to keep our jails empty!)

Oh for sure this lawyer is earning his keep this day, what I thought was incredible was that the lawyers were not falling down laughing! Yes, laughing at how out of touch this “Commissioner” was, OMG. A big deal? Not necessarily in the world of divorce or in this case child custody.

Now for the trophy, Genie and Guncile have parents who are in battle for the sweet little infant. One wants the little girl to be safe, (wrong court people), the other wants their granddaughter to be closer to them in the mountains above Tahoe. Guncile, burps up, “I will take care of her, I will do whatever I have to”… “I will move back to the Los Angeles area and I will take care of my daughter” via his mouthpiece. OK, that means, get an apartment and get a job…Oh I almost forgot, guess what Guncile does for work in the mountains: he is a part time BARTENDER…get me a drink and quick!

Then somehow it goes into, well, “my brother has a girlfriend, who has a mother, who has a house in Glendale and I can take the portable crib.” Well how about this? NO ONE, NOT THE JUDGE, NOT EITHER LAWYER, THE GRANDPARENTS OR THE MOTHER (GENIE) KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THESE PEOPLE WHERE THIS Superior Court Commissioner IS APPROVING THE CHILD BE KEPT, for 12 hours twice a week!!!!!!

What happend to “I am going to take care of my daughter?” Bullshit, Guncile is conning the court and is going to find a third party to give him shelter and it is again a place that no one at all knows anything about!

This commissioner issued orders in support of such a plan. Guncile is as immature as they come, he drinks for his courage, he is a part time bartender, he has no car (DUI)…go get insurance with that hanging around your neck…and has no way to provide for this infant, and the court went along with much of this Tom Foolery! This sounds nuts, but it is the truth.

Before I forget, have you ever seen the guy who shows up wearing a suit that you can tell is either not his or so ill-fitting that you wonder what was he thinking when he put it on? Well Guncile shows up, sure, “look I am wearing a suit,” hmm the pockets were big enough that he could hold a 32 ounce in one pocket and a pint of scotch in the other…good job for whoever thought of the suit, but the haircut did not match, ya almost had it, but you missed the target. He still looked like a little jerk in an ill-fitting suit (Old Cop thinking).

I have never seen such a mockery of the family law courts in all of my years of working and investigating and writing on this very subject. I was wondering would this bench officer ever send one of HIS infants to live for 12 hours a day without knowing WHO are these people, is the place clean, do they have dogs, cats, a pool? None of this was even addressed, as Mr. Commissioner was having none of it.

Oh but wait, initially this legal beagle was going to give Guncile OVERNIGHTS with the infant of several months, Genie’s lawyer was up against a wall of ignorance. And how about this, there was not even a psychologist or a therapist to do an evaluation. Genie’s lawyer asked that he at least hold off on that till a mental health professional could look at Guncile…the comments this commissioner was making in chambers (heard second hand) and on the bench were some of the worst decisions/thoughts of any commissioner sitting in any divorce court that I have ever heard. You will seldom find us at DESPERATEEXES.COM not supporting a commissioner or a judge, but this is just off the board of taking care of a little baby girl.

****Mr. Commissioner, I am not going to use your name at this time. Your wanting for this child to bond with “Daddy” is a fine idea, however, you need to make sure that the person you are handing this child off to is what he says he is…the evidence presented to you in your courtroom showed vividly that he is not and will not be that person, not in the near future (advice from an old street cop). You made some major blunders this morning and this afternoon…neither of these two youngsters are without fault, but one certainly stands much stronger when the facts are read and you apparently either did not read, or ignored, the facts that were presented to you.

Will John J. Nazarian tell us which “Commissioner’s Court” this decision was handed down in on September 22? Will we get a follow-up from Mr. Nazarian as to just how well this works out for this precious infant girl? Will John J. Nazarian give us any hints who the young couple is, or if there were even any character witnesses in court? So many questions I have and such few clues from Mr. Nazarian as to who this “Commissioner was”. I guess we will have to wait and see as the old song goes.

Mr. Nazarian’s article is at this URL, as is a wealth of other articles from Courts, to Judge and Lawyer ratings, to trips Mr. Nazarian has taken, many on business.

http://desperateexes.com/2009/09/22/poor-judgment-commissioner/.

©John J. Nazarian
September 24, 2009
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 13 Comments »

John J. Nazarian P. I. to the Rich and Famous

“We will use ‘real’ words, I love the word ‘DIVORCE’, family law sounds like a pleasant experience. Folks none of this is going to be pleasant, maybe two or three times I have had clients who realized what time it was and did the right thing. What you ask is the right thing? You have ten dollars and you take five dollars and the other side gets five dollars. Otherwise the ten dollars goes like this, your lawyer will take $4.00 and the other lawyer will take $4.00 and some lucky private investigator will get $1.50. I have made this as simple as I can and yes I have seen this done with millions of dollars and yes everyone was thrilled, that is the lawyers and me!

The subject of these articles will be based on real people going through a real day in court. No one has ever accused me of mincing words and if it is a pig I am calling it just that, a pig.”

…. So I hope that my perspective will help women and men who have decided to take the plunge and DIVORCE each other. Nazarian and Associates thanks RoseSpeaks.com for their interest in these observations from a courtroom in America, sure every state is different but there is very common denominators when comes to ‘screwing each other’ in the game known as DIVORCE.

Here is our lead in to the first of the articles of John J. Nazarian’s series of DIVORCE! If you have a question ask Mr. Nazarian if he can I am sure he will either answer it or address it in an upcoming article.

This article by John J. Nazarian is called the “Persian two step”, funny but serious also and one any of us no matter rich or poor can relate to …. It is DIVORCE

________________________________________________

After seeing Laurel and Hardy on Monday I got away from the craziness that comes with famous dead people and headed for higher ground. Well let me tell you, I stopped by the Honorable Amy Pellman, Judge, department 65. Action for me is judges being just that — judges — and liars, excuse me, I mean people who sit before the judge and tell their sad stories, true or not? Who can ever tell, after awhile it is like being a parent or an old copper who has heard so much crap on a daily basis that even before the offender opens their pie hole you know they are liars.

…I have to tell you that for anyone to have to sit and listen to divorce people wanting to get through the process for 5 minutes can make you want to grind your teeth. These judges who handle family law, aka DIVORCE, are not paid enough nor am I for the constant attack on our common sense. ….She had a Big Fat Liar in her sights and she was not going to be playing anymore games with him or his lawyer. Talk about interesting, here was the “doctor” who was just “broke” and had already paid over $500,000 in legal fees, investigative fees, accounting fees and only God knows what else…But not one cent for child support. This guy had performed the now famous “Persian two step.” For those of you who do not know what this is well let me explain, there are other versions of the two step, but this one is one of the best. …

…Judge Pellman busts one over this guy’s head by telling him that “not to pay child support for five years” was unconscionable and she has had enough. She asks Da Doc’s lawyer, “how many days in a week?”… It is simple folks, you want to totally screw over the X-wifee all you do is get rid of all your assets….

To read the rest of John J. Nazarian newest article on DIVORCE, click the link below:

http://desperateexes.com/2009/08/07/judge-amy-pellman-dropkicks-the-two-step/.

©John J. Nazarian
August 9, 2009
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 3 Comments »

The forecast for 75647 by Wunderground for WordPress

Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith