Ok new documents I stayed up last night to get this done for you. There are thousands of pages of documents and I have to scan each batch to pull out those being used during the trial and not clutter the article with those dumped into the public domain by the D. A. that will not be used in the case.

July 28 2009 Cindy Anthony Deposition in Criminal Case Part 1 (670)
July 29 2009 Cindy Anthony Deposition in Criminal Case Part 2 (438)
Feb 19 2010 statement of Kystal Holloway alleged Mistress of George Anthony (507)

OLDER DOCUMENTS THAT WERE REFERRED TO BY THE DEFENSE THIS WEEK:

July 23 2008 Air sent to Oak Ridge Labs and how it was packed (202)
FBI comprhensive list of evidence delivered to be tested (255)
2008 Communication log on dna results and tests (223)
October 3 2008 FBI final all things of the car submitted over many months (239)
October 15 2008 FBI last of hair and DNA swabs of Anthony family and results (219)
Oct 31 2008 David W Hall Botonist including bill for prosecution (200)
Sept 2 2010 FBI testing for contamination of evidence by hair samples of CSI persons in Orange County and at FBI (228)

I will continue to put up more throughout today, the problem I am running into is that in ten of thousands pages is that there are a lot of duplicates almost as if the D. A. hopes you get so tired of seeing duplicates over and over again you stop going through it. However, that said more we will be uploading for you to read throughout today so keep checking back.

Here is the Defense Witness List As of August 2008 and also the State List of Witnesses as some are crossover from the State Witnesses being recalled by the Defense If you want to review some of the documents relating to the States case those are archived in our download section for Casey Anthony.

August 29, 2010 Casey Anthony Defense Witness List (623)
Florida State Witness List in Florida vs. Casey Anthony (1496)
Seating chart of who gets to sit where in this trial. Court Room seating chart for Casey Anthony Trial (500)

Previous Documents that were uploaded throughout the defense case.

July 28 2008 FBI Forensics of trunk liner hair from Caylee and other Anthony Family from home and DNA Parentage Testing (326)
April 23 2010 Request from Anthony Defense confirm evidence from depositions. (180)
Anthony Defense Latin Print Requests following April 2 2010 Deposition of Elizabeth Fontaine (278)
2008 Communication log on dna results and other tests by FBI Very intersting reading (309)
FBI comprehensive list of evidence delivered to be tested requesting any tests the FBI wanted to do or thought should be done (223)
Aug 4 2008 Soil Dirt Shovel and trunk liner sent and correspondence within FBI (228)
Aug 8 2008 Clothing and additional pieces of the trunk and correspondence within FBI (251)

Join other posters to discuss this evidence in the Casey Anthony Trial there and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=28

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the Casey Anthony case we have loaded as well as any of the other cases we are following.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
June 24, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

On the show Tuesday Night, June 21, 2011, Dr. Drew addressed the possible two faces of George Anthony with two experts, Mark Eiglarsh, criminal defense attorney and Robin Sax, former prosecutor. Dr. Drew took a deeper look at Casey’s father, George Anthony, as the defense is about to call his alleged mistress, Krystal Holloway, to testify that Caylee’s death was an accident. If you remember she was a searcher for Caylee Anthony that allegedly became George Anthony’s mistress after meeting him during that time of searching for his granddaughter, Caylee.

Dr Drew had this show as the defense in the Casey Anthony murder trial is continuing to heat up! Dr Drew was asking; “Is the defense on to something or are they once again trying to drag George further through the mud? He has also been accused of sexually abusing Casey, a claim never proven in court, on top of being accused of covering up Caylee’s accidental death”.

In part of the video from the show, Mark Eiglarsh, criminal defense attorney, explained the defense’s strategy by calling Krystal to the stand: “”This is the way they do it. Now, [Krystal's] going to say that George said to her that this was an accident that snowballed out of control. The prosecution’s going to object, ‘that’s hearsay,’ but the judge is going to let it in because it goes to impeach George’s earlier testimony that he knew nothing about an accident, or a drowning or anything like that. This is going to help the defense.”

Robin Sax, former prosecutor, thinks this testimony won’t prove the defense’s case: “The prosecutor is then going to have to go through and then present all these other pieces of evidence that in the end, is going to make this just another red herring that’s going to not amount to much, other than to look like he’s a bad dirty guy. And who really cares? If you’re the prosecutor, the fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree and so he’s one other scumbag in the family of scumbags.”

What do you think? Does attacking George Anthony help the defense’s case in proving Casey’s innocence? Let us know what you think as you continue to follow Dr. Drew’s take on Casey Anthony on HLN, Head Line News, at 9pm ET/PT and 8pm CT/MT

Join other posters to discuss this evidence in the Casey Anthony Trial there and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=28

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the Casey Anthony case we have loaded as well as any of the other cases we are following:

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
June 22, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.