Other then the settlement TMZ. com reported this morning of; “The Michael Jackson Estate has settled its lawsuit against the Heal the World Foundation, and the Estate is now copacetic with the charity using Michael Jackson’s name… …The attorneys settled the beef, so Heal the World can now use Michael’s name and likeness, and Katherine [Jackson] will sit on the Board of Directors of the charity.”, nothing has come out of the federal court this morning. Once it does we will post it at the end of this article.
It does appear Katherine Jackson’s new lawyer, Perry Sanders, was able to negotiate at the eleventh hour with John Branca and the Estate of Michael Jackson’s attorney, Howard Weitzman.
We are only putting up the newest documents and then from February 7, 2011 in regards to the deposition of Howard Mann and filings from March 4, 2011 on behalf of the Estate. The older filed from 2009 and 2010 are up and can be found under the Heal the World Foundation lawsuit in our download section under the Michael Jackson section.
Documents filed on February 7, 2011 by the Estate to force Howard Mann to do a deposition on this case while the Estate has a pending lawsuit in another federal Court.
Partial documents from March 4, 2011 Michael Jackson Estate’s filing Ex Parte Application for “Leave” to File a Supplement to the Original Complaint in this lawsuit.
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl runs that entire section don’t hesitate to contact her to make suggestions on how this forum is more user friendly.
Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following.
We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.
Here is the list of Documents Filed by both the Estate of Michael Jackson, via Executors John Branca and John McClain vs Heal the World Foundation and Melissa Johnson.
These with the previous article, dated April 14, 2011, gets the filings up to date through April 16, 2011. There are older documents up in the Download Section that have not been listed with an article yet. I will try to get a quick article up later tonight with a list of ALL documents filed from January 1, 2011 through March 9, 2011. That will be those doucments not listed individually in this article or the article posted on April 14, 2011.
Diamond Girl is our resident expert on who is who in the All Things Michael Jackson overlapping cases, she also runs the Community which has a wide selection of discussion topics. You can message Diamond Girl through the message system at the Community if you have question or suggestions. Remember the simple rules, attack the subject being debated and not a poster, and if you don’t like what someone has posted, scroll on by to the next post.
We are going to continue to post all of the overlapping Michael Jackson lawsuits because it appears that all of these lawsuits have many of the same people involved…. Go Figure huh?
We will have all of the documents in this suit up in an article and listed before the Bench Trial on April 19, 2011 at 8:30 A. M. I have no idea if there is any “real” witnesses in a federal bench trial, or if it is just the attorneys presenting evidence in arguments before the Court of Judge Dolly M Gee. My “guess” is that Judge Gee will issue a ruling later and not on April 19, 2011. If we get updates on this we will let you know as that happens.
If you find a link via Google please share it with all of us here.
Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl runs that entire section don’t hesitate to contact her to make suggestions on how this forum is more user friendly.
We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.
As I was going through the paper work on the Estate of Micheal J. Jackson = Entertainment attorney, John G. Branca and Music Executive John McClain vs Heal the World Foundation that I found what I think is the smoking gun of these two men trying to tangle up everything to do with this poor poor mother and grandmother, Katherine Jackson while they rake in millions of dollars from a client, Michael Jackson who fired them in 2003.
When you begin to read the Probate coverage from 2009 that once again you can realize how nuts things in Hollywood in the world of the Rich, Famous and POWERFUL, and how different it is from those who have no money really is about. In the beginning when this Will from 2002 was produced and the Court agreed in 2009 to Honor it, I frankly was “tied up in other lawsuits”, literally. Now as I have read through this I find that the third executor named, Barry Siegel, Micheal Jackson’s former accountant, had the INTEGRITY to say something like; hey the Will was done in 2002, Michael fired all three of us in 2003, I won’t do this because I don’t think this is what Michael would want!!! WOW that still happens in Hollywood?
However, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff did named Entertainment attorney, John G. Branca and Music Executive John McClain as co Special Administrators and Executors of the Estate, and later agreed to pay them a HUGE fee and keep that amount private which of course brings up WTF? Does anyone care about this eighty year old grandmother and more importantly Michael Jackson’s three children?
We are going to start with March 10, 2011 of the Estate’s Supplement Filing to the Original Complaint in this article through the current filings. However there are older filings in the download section of the Heal the World Foundation Lawsuit. Sometime between midnight and noon tomorrow we will have the next article up with a list of other documents.
We will see you have all of the documents to read and discuss before the bench trial, which starts at 8:30 AM on April 19, 2011 in Federal Court with Judge Dolly M Gee presiding. You know these judges have these characters number, but can do very little about any real justice, because their hands are tied by statutes you know those things draped in the term of “laws”. Think about that brain teaser.
Here are the two you tube videos that Kathrine Jackson refers to in her April 8, 2011 Declaration. Watch them and then do you see why she politely wished her current and now ex-lawyer the best in his “future”.
Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl runs that entire section don’t hesitate to contact her to make suggestions on how this forum is more user friendly.
We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.
This is an unedited, draft entry. Please refer to the MSM (mainstream media) for 100% accuracy. If you are copying and pasting to other web sites before the edit, please be sure to include a link-back to this specific entry and this disclaimer with your copy. Thank you, Sprocket.
Deputy District Attorneys: Deborah Brazil David Walgren
Defense lawyers J. Michael Flannigan Joseph Low Edward Chernoff
#21 Christopher Rogers LA Co coroner Chief forensic medicine. ##22 Dr. Richard Lewis Ruffalo Clinical Anesthesiologist
Christopher Rogers
LA Co coroner. position. Chief forensic medicine. Supervise doctors who work at coroner’s office, and occasionally do autopsies himself.
Manner of death?
Homicide
Homicide based on what?
It was based primarily based on the info we had on the medical care MJ receded. The care was substandard.
Cross by Flanagan.
Now tell me, how do drugs get in to the heart blood?
Well, in this setting, propofol has to be administered intravenously, and so that blood circulates throughout the body.
.
So, an injection? Yes. Iv? Yes. Orally Yes.
But in the event that propofol were taken orally, that’s one way it could appear in the stomach? Yes, that’s a way it could appear in the stomach.
And if this is the hypothetical, of ingestion of propofol by the decedent, and ingestion of lydocaine, by the decedent, this would not be a homicide?
I would think it would still be a homicide. Based on the quality y of the medical of care, I would still consider it a homicide even if the Dr. did not give the propofol…
REDIRECT
Let’s assume that Dr. left him alone with the patient and the patient self administered, (snip; I don’t get the full hypothetical) you would still (rule it a homicide based on the standard of care.)
Yes.
Recross Flanagan
So, even if Dr. Murray gave more than 25 mg between 1040 and 10:50 we still have the same result that MJ would be awake at 11 o’clock?
Yes, assuming there was a single dose.
And that he would also be dead by 11 o’clock? ???
Richard Lewis Ruffalo
Anesthesiologist.
And what’s a clinical pharmacologist? That’s someone who studies drugs and how they are used.
So, he thinks the numbers of the benzodiazapams from the heart blood, he thinks reflect an injection/ingestion of a HIGHER dose than what Dr. Murray states he gave.
To read the rest of the first part of day five and for all of the detailed information as to what Sprocket heard and saw visit Trials and Tribulations.
This is an unedited, draft entry. Please refer to the MSM (mainstream media) for 100% accuracy. If you are copying and pasting to other web sites before the edit, please be sure to include a link-back to this specific entry and this disclaimer with your copy. Thank you, Sprocket.
Focusing on just those that you mentioned, who now become an extreme departure of care.
Yes.
So each individual, when you put them together, it becomes so egregious, that it becomes extreme. That any physician should know should be trained in the basics of life support.
Overall, identified several points of extreme deviation of care.
And addressed the one handed CPR on the bed. “Totally useless.”
One handed behind the back? It’s totally useless. You can’t get enough pressure to push down on the chest. We use that in neonatal. Describes what you should do with an adult in the bed. Describes how you get them out of the bed easily. Even if you claim you can’t move the person from the bed, the proper training would be to protect the head, slide the individual off the bed, and then be able to start chest compression.
Even if they are morbidly obese, you can generally do that…
Cross by Flannigan
45x what it is in the hospital blood. That doesn’t go with your theory.
Yes, I made a mistake.
Now if we have 45x whets in the stomach than what’s in the blood. then we have evidence of oral ingestion.
We may have to check with the coroner, to check with what the numbers mean. Now, it doesn’t make sense unless he ingested it orally.
So, we’re back to it being orally? Well, we’ll have to talk to the coroner.
It’s a big difference isn’t’ it?
I totally agree.
REDIRECT
Assuming self administration as Mr. F included, would any of your opinions change in your standard of care?
No. You don’t walk away from a patient. (explains in detail. Addicts, that is the first tip off, you don’t walk away, just like a heroin addict.)
The people rest their case.
No defense presented except a statement
Judge Pastor: Is the Attorney General present? (did JP ask that? I think they said they were!)
JP said he was ready to rule on that request (from the medical board).
This court has reviewed all the evidence the def motion to dismiss is denied. Appear 2 me of the evidence the offense has been committed, in order Dr Murray be held there for.
Ms. Saunders Medical board.
We’re appearing on behalf of director of the medical board, to provide justice and that as a condition of bail, that the defendant have restrictions on him as a condition of his bail not to be able to practice…
After trial, that this order to this defendant not practice and to show that an order of the safely to the public has been met.
Since the defendant held over, that there are restrictions on his license are in effect we further request that he be prevented from practicing here in California.
Judge Pastor: Increase the bail, court denies the request. Satisfied that the bail presently set, which is three times the presumptive bail (is sufficient (. Certainly recognize posture. court does have the ability to reconsider, I have done so and I am satisfied and shall remain.
This hearing has been a significant hearing as far as presentation and evidence and the rights of the defense to explore evidence presented and to underline the sufficiency of any case. The cross has been extensive probing and vigorous. There is no erroneous issue of a depravity issue.
So as I balance all of these factors under Eldridge and People vs. Ramirez, due process has been afforded Dr. Murray.
Circumstances have changed have changed dramatically, court finds extraordinary mandates to approving the request by the medical board.
So, he’s restricting the license or banning it all together. cites a case the overall consideration of the protection of the public, and I’m satisfied that non intervention at this time, does impose a danger to public safety.
In this case there is a direct nexus and connection between the actions of Dr. Murray, and a homicide. …and the fitness and competence to practice medicine.
In undertaking an issue of restrictions ct recognizes the standard of proof is not simple probable cause, the standard of proof the ct must utilize, there is clear and convincing proof that there is a certainly that sanctions are appropriate.
Immediately cease and desist from practicing in the state of California is now suspended by this court as a condition of bail.
They are to notify the appropriate authorities in other states within the next 24 hours.
Provide represite proof to this court, in the next 24 hours. to any and all licensing agencies where Dr. M holds a license.
Dr. Murray is not to practice in any other jurisdiction, in less he is so license.
Arraignment will be set two weeks from today. January 25th, at 8L30 A. M.
Nothing else?
Sprocket goes into detail, it is a great read and gives more information then what the main stream media has time to give. Be sure to keep up with all of the trials covered by Trials and Tribulation.
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl who is in charge of the community has made it easier to join and be part of the discussion.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our true crime writer, Sprocket, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Please refer to the MSM (mainstream media) for 100% accuracy. If you are copying and pasting to other web sites before the edit, please be sure to include a link-back to this specific entry and this disclaimer with your copy. Thank you, Sprocket.
Deputy District Attorneys: Deborah Brazil David Walgren
Defense lawyers J. Michael Flannigan Joseph Low Edward Chernoff
Witness #17 Stephen J. Marx, computer forensic examiner Witness #18 Tim Lopez Las Vegas specialty pharmacy owner #19 Jaime Lintemoot Senior criminologist. LA co dept of coroner’s office. #20 Orlando Martinez city of LA robbery homicide.
I can’t remember who told me this (I think it was In Session’s correspondent Beth Karas but I’m NOT positive) but one of Dr. Murray’s attorneys is J. Michael Flanagan. Apparently, Flanagan is noted for achieving an acquittal for a defendant in another case involving propofol.
DDA Walgren: We will be calling toxicologists to the stand today or tomorrow. There will be summary report of that finding that will be introduced. No problem from the defense about that.
DDA stipulate that iPhone is the phone recovered on July 28th, 2009. All stipulate.
DDA discussed Marx’ background, employment on July 28th, 2009 Computer forensic examiner in the DEA. Now since retired. Was employed 7-8 years. responsible for extracting computer evidence and present it for evidence (at trial).
DDA Q: Did conduct analysis of this iPhone as related to the unallocated space.
Marx: Yes.
DDA Q: Did you find some screen shots?
Marx: Yes I did.
(Sprocket note: Clerical issue. Walgren restate numbering issue. Goes over the Exhibit numbers and what they are specifically. I check with reporter next to me who believes it was Conrad Murray denying the release of his medical records regarding Michael Jackson.)
DDA Q: (Ms. Brazil direct.) Through questioning, establishes Lopez’ background. Employed as a pharmacist for 15 years. Business owner of Applied Pharmacy Services, located in Las Vegas, Nevada. Describes his duties as owner; clientele is patients that have been directed by a doctor/facility.
Through questioning, DDA establishes that in June (Sprocket note: year illegible may be 2008) received a phone call from Conrad Murray. He identified himself as African American and that most of his patients were African American and that some of these patients suffer from vitaliago. He was asking about bedoquin product, regarding the strength it comes in. Murray was interested in the 20% strength.
DDA Q: Did he ask if you were able to provide medications for his other clinics?
Lopez: Yes. He asked about propofol and saline bags.
Sprocket then goes through the amount of supplies and medicines ordered from Lopez and shipping information including FedEx tracing.
Cross by defense attorney Low.
Q: Is it fair to say as a pharmacist, part of your job is to provide prescription medication to doctors?
Lopez: Yes.
Q: There are a lot of laws and rules and regs your supposed to (comply with)?
Lopez (paraphrasing): Before you [can] be a good pharmacist, is following the rules, is before filling a new prescription, you need to verify the validity … of the license.
To read the rest of the first part of day five and for all of the detailed information as to what Sprocket heard and saw visit Trials and Tribulations.
1/12/11 6:30 am partial edit by Sprocket & bolding to highlight testimony.
This is an unedited, draft entry. Please refer to the MSM (mainstream media) for 100% accuracy. If you are copying and pasting to other web sites before the edit, please be sure to include a link-back to this specific entry and this disclaimer with your copy. Thank you, Sprocket.
JAIME LINTEMOOT
LA co dept of coroner’s office. Senior criminologist. What is a senior criminologist. As a criminologist. my job is to study science as it pertains to the law. How long employed as criminologist? About 9 years.
have received formal education Yes. She describes DS in forensic chem. from Arizona Cal State applied forensic scientists. Board certified in criminalistics
Prior to 2005 office did not have a method to determine propofol (in the body). She did research and established a method to find propofol (in bodies).
She had to find a drug that mimic the drug standard. Do duplication studies. Had to determine recovery, many things that go into establishing this method.
Prepared an 8 page report detailing her findings. Peoples 68.
A laboratory summary report was prepared that detailed all her findings. She specifically handled the propofol. Yes.
Cross by Flanagan.
Why is it different from the femoral blood?
obj calls for speculation.
It is not uncommon for us to have different numbers from femoral blood and heart blood. If going overall level, will rely on femoral blood (vs. heart blood).
Orlando Martinez
Work city of LA robbery homicide. What do you homicide section investigate deaths. 16 years. Since May of 2005
One of lead investigating officers?
Yes.
Were you assigned and working on this case? yes.
Did you make efforts to make contact with the defendant in this case? I did
Was able to make contact on June 29th?
At some point on June 26th, made contact with Michael Penia?
Made arrangements to sit down and meet with the defendant…
Dr. Murray said he received a phone call from Michael Amir Williams requesting to treat him for the tour.
did Dr M tell you that MJ wanted him to accompany him on this London tour? Yes.
Sprocket goes into detail of this detective interview with Dr. Murray about the last night and day of Michael Jackson’s life.
Cross.
Chernoff. You left out a lot in your discussion.
Now talking about the offering a job on the THIS IS IT tour. …do you recall that Dr. Murray told you about a period of time and that MJ called Dr. M in order to obtain a Doctor that would provide MJ with propofol, Dr. David Adams. That other doctor was David Adams.
Sprocket goes into detail about the cross exam of detective Martinez it is a great read and gives more information then what the main stream media has time to give. Be sure to keep up with all of the trials covered by Trials and Tribulation.
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our true crime writer, Sprocket, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
PART ONE EDIT TIMES Friday, January 7, 2011 (notes edited January 7, 2011 by Caligirl9 at 4 p.m.) Correction edit by Sprocket 1/8, 9 p.m.
Deputy District Attorneys: Debrah Brazil David Walgren
Defense lawyers J. Michael Flanigan Joseph Low Edward Chernoff
Witness #12: Detective Dan Myers LAPD detective. Witness # 13 Sade Anding Girlfriend of Dr. Murray Witness #14: Bridgette Morgan Witness #15: Nicole Alvarez Girlfriend of Dr. Murray Witness #16: Elissa Fleak LA County Coroner Investigator
Detective Myers continues
Cross by defense attorney Ed Chernoff
Myers: Sade Anding was one of the people that he talked to and that she was the phone call of 11:51. Yes. Misstates. The call was to Miss Anding, not from.
Direct of Sade Anding from Houston Texas
DDA Q: From that first meeting with Dr. Murray, did you see him with some frequency? (Objection sustained.) When you first meet him did you see him on other occasions? Did Dr. Murray refer to you as his girlfriend? Were you Conrad Murray’s girlfriend?
Anding: Yes.
DDA Q: What time was it your time in Houston [when Dr. Murray called]?
Anding: I know it was 12:30 about. It was in the afternoon yes.
DDA Q: What did he say when he first spoke?
Anding: He told me he it was Conrad; he said “Hi,” and “How are you?”
DDA Q: Did you recognize his voice?
Anding: Yes.
DDA Q: [Referring back to June 25 phone call] So you interrupt Dr. Murray and start chatting about your day and going on in your life?
Anding: Yes
12:06 pm
I’m in the cafeteria, wolfing down my lunch before I do some editing then posting the testimony of the last three witnesses, the last being Nicole Alvarez. I don’t think I’ve heard as many “I don’t recall” answers in my life!
DDA Q: Let’s start with April 2009? Was Dr. Murray living at your residence?
Alvarez: I’m trying to answer accurately. I wouldn’t describe it as permanent residence.
DDA Q: Do you have a son with Dr. Murray?
Alvarez: Yes. Born in March, 2009.
Alvarez knew that Dr. Murray would be going to England. She was invited to go along with him. Doesn’t recall when she was invited.
DDA Q: Were you excited about the trip?
Alvarez: Definitely! Definitely.
The rest covers Alvarez’s testimony about packages deliver to her address and Sprocket take on this witness.
To read the rest of the first part of day four and for all of the detailed information as to what Sprocket heard and saw visit Trials and Tribulations.
PART TWO EDITS AND TIMES January 7, 2011 afternoon session. Edited by Caligirl 9 at 5 p.m. Correction edits by Sprocket 1/8 @ 9 p.m.
Direct of Elissa Fleak
DDA Q Did you document who prescribed?
Fleak: reports diazepam (Valium), Flomax, Lidocaine lotion, lorazepam (Ativan), temazepam (Restoril, a sleep aid) prescribed by Dr. Murray. [ed. note: A cardiologist prescribing a med for prostatic hypertrophy?] Clonazepam (antianxiety), trazodone (antidepressant) by a Dr. Metzger, name missed prescribed by Dr. Klein [ed. note: presume Benoquin as it’s a medication used for vitiligo]
The rest of the coverage of this witness is about photos of Jackson’s rented home and evidence, very worth while reading and visit Trials and Tribulations.
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our true crime writer, Sprocket, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Part I Edited by Caligirl9 on January 7, 2011 at 7:40 p.m. Correction edit by Sprocket 1/8, 9:00 p.m.
Prosecution Witnesses
#6 Richard Senneff
#7 Paramedic Martin Blount
#8 AT&T Harry Daliwal
#9 Sprint Nextel communications Jeff Strohm
#10 UCLA Emergency medicine physician Dr. Richelle Cooper
#11 Cardiologist fellow, UCLA Dr. Thao Nguyen
#12 Detective LAPD Dan Myers
Deputy District attorneys
David Walgren
DDA Debrah Brazil
Defense attorneys
J. Michael Flanigan
Joseph Low
Edward Chernoff
Richard Senneff still on the stand under cross by [Joseph] Low.
…Q: Left off where the hospital gave you the choice to call it (the death).
Senneff: That’s not correct. When we give our third round of meds we update vital sings of any changes. Read all the information. There was no change in the patient.
They (UCLA) said, “We’d like to call it.” It’s their call…
…Q: Was there at some point did Dr. Murray say that he had found a pulse?
Senneff: Yes he did. (Murray claimed he felt a pulse in the femoral artery; this large artery is in the leg close to the groin.)
As soon as he said it, the first thing I did was look at the monitor….
… REDIRECT
DDA. Mr. [David]Walgren
DDA Q: Asking about femoral pulse during treatment.
Senneff: When Dr. Murray said he felt a pulse, not one of the other paramedics had felt a pulse. There can be a “false” pulse during CPR compressions. They stopped compressions for a few seconds, and then resumed. He did not feel a pulse….
… DDA Q: Your opinion of this patient was based on the surroundings, the IV, the look of the patient, quite thin and pale, the doctor being there. In fact, it was your opinion that the patient was dead.
…. DDA Q: You thought it was inaccurate that the doctor said the patient had just gone down with the call?
Senneff: Yes sir.
DDA Q: (Re-verifies with the witness) That you are comfortable with a time that the patient went down prior to your arrival?
Senneff: “20 minutes to an hour.”….
Witness #7—Paramedic Martin Blount
….. Dr. Murray was the one who opened the door and requested help. He noticed that Dr. Murray was sweating profusely…. … He did hear Dr. Murray being asked if the patient had been given any drugs and Dr. Murray said no. Dr. Murray explained that the reason there was an IV was because the patient had been dehydrated….
…Blount noticed the IV wasn’t operating properly, so they were looking for a site on the arms to insert a new IV. Blount said, “To me, the temperature of Jackson’s skin was cool.”…
… He observed that the patient’s eyes were “blown” [ed. note: blown means large and unresponsive to light]. It was Blount’s opinion, from observing the body, that the patient was dead….
… CROSS by Low
Going over his testimony of questions that Dr. Murray was asked. Questioning Blount about how long he thought Michael Jackson had been down, Blount verifying that it was his impression that the patient looked deceased when he first came in the room. Verifies that he testified that he thought the patient’s skin was cool….
… REDIRECT
DDA Q: If someone has no viable heart rhythm, then blood cannot be circulating through the body one of the things that happens is the veins collapse and they can be difficult to access.
Blount: Correct.
Witness #8— Harry Daliwal
DDA Debrah Brazil direct.
…Daliwal…. Access over phone records, text messages.
Witness #9 Jeff Strohm
Strohm: I work for Sprint Nextel communications where I am a custodian of records. As a custodian I’m responsible for testifying.
Responsible for various types of legal commands.
Sprocket goes into the details of times of texts and calls from these two witnesses, be sure and keep up with Sprocket and this trial at Trials and Tribulations:
To read the rest of Sprocket’s article on day three part one of her coverage of the preliminary hearing of Dr. Conrad Murray in the death of Michael Jackson visit her site, Trials and Tribulations at the below link:
Part II Thursday, January 6 notes, edited and ed. notes by Caligirl9 on January 7, 2011 @ 6 p.m. Correction edit by Sprocket 1/8, 9 p.m.
…Witness #10—Dr. Richelle Cooper: UCLA Emergency medicine physician.
…. The patient had no sign of life. The pupils were fixed and dilated. The patient was dead on arrival to UCLA. Despite that condition, they attempted to revive the patient. No pulse; no other signs of trauma. Proceeded to administer other drugs. Patient is still being ventilated and CPR is continuing and cardiac monitors on the patient….
To read the rest of Sprocket’s article on day three part two of her coverage of the preliminary hearing of Dr. Conrad Murray in the death of Michael Jackson visit her site, Trials and Tribulations at the below link:
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our true crime writer, Sprocket, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Entries (RSS)