Posts Tagged “80th District Court Harris County Texas”

Roy Kronk has hair been tested

Howard K. Stern cites fear of being “served” with a new lawsuit as reason to stay clear of Texas. One gets the feeling he actually might hate Texas the home of the “love of his life”, Anna Nicole Smith.

Here are the latest filings:

May 10, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Motion to Quash deposition of Virgie Arthur in Houston Texas.

May 10, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibit A filed with Howard K. Stern’s Motion to Quash deposition of Virgie Arthur in Houston Texas.

May 10, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibit B filed with Howard K. Stern’s Motion to Quash deposition of Virgie Arthur in Houston Texas.

May 10, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibit C filed with Howard K. Stern’s Motion to Quash deposition of Virgie Arthur in Houston Texas.

May 10, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibit D filed with Howard K. Stern’s Motion to Quash deposition of Virgie Arthur in Houston Texas.

May 10, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibit E filed with Howard K. Stern’s Motion to Quash deposition of Virgie Arthur in Houston Texas.

May 10, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibit F filed with Howard K. Stern’s Motion to Quash deposition of Virgie Arthur in Houston Texas.

May 10, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Sur-Reply to TMZ – Harvey Levin Reply and Objections to Arthur’s Response to TMZ-Levin Motion for Summary Judgment.

May 11, 2010 Notice of TMZ – Levin Submission to Court to admit California lawyer Pro Hac Vice to the court set for May 17, 2010.

Filings from Last Week:

May 7, 2010 TMZ-Levin Objections and Motion to Strike Arthur’s exhibits in Arthur’s Response to TMZ-Levin Motion for Summary Judgment.

May 7, 2010 Court Order New Docket Control Schedules for Texas state Court case.

May 7, 2010 Court Order governing Art Harris Protection from Virgie Arthur’s Motion to Compel and what Harris must turn over not to be shared with any Pro Se litigants in this case.

Filings from this Week:

May 12, 2010 Defendant Rose Turner’s Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties for Busystreet Productions LLC.

May 12, 2010 Turner’s Submission for May 24, 201 on Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 13, 2010 Art Harris Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 13, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit A field with Harris’ Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 13, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit B field with Harris’ Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 13, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit C field with Harris’ Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 13, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit D field with Harris’ Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 13, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit E field with Harris’ Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 13, 2010 Harris’ Notice Notice of Submission on Response, Objection and Motion to Strike Turner’s Motion for Leave to Designate Responsible Third Parties.

May 13, 2010 First Court of Appeals Request for Response from Art Harris due by May 21, 2010 if he disputes any of the factual information in Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Rehearing.

May 14, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Supplement to Motion to Quash Deposition and for Protective Order.

May 14, 2101 Stern Exhibit A filed with Stern’s Supplement to Motion to Quash Deposition and for Protective Order.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
May 12, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 123 Comments »

Rose Speaks.com News

Please note on the right hand side of the main page is a scrolling calendar. –>–>–>–>–>–>–>–>–>–>–>

This will always have the next thirty days of upcoming important dates on cases we are covering and is the final part of transferring from the old “main site” to the blog as the main site. Please remember that if you are a member of the forums there is a calendar link at the top right header of that page.

We have two scheduled maintenance this week on the blog software and on the contact us software. If you are a new reader here and have a tip for a case you want to give us then please use the contact us button at the top of each page. We want to hear from you and what you want. This leaves only the updated documents that are still not relinked, however with each article we do on each case we are putting up the downloads up to date on that case. We hope to have a document link at the top of the page as we catch up that will give you the ease of all cases you want papers too. If you want or need one of the papers that are not linked yet drop us an email and we will get that right out to you.

On the Anna Nicole Smith Estate vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley etc. I am did not see any papers filed by some deadline for December 28. I tried to figure out if it was a Response by Susan M. Brown’s being added to the suit as well as Gina Shelley, Gaither B. Thompson II and his wife Melodie Thompson. It could be a Reply by the Estate due on a Response filed by one of the defendants in regards to the Motions for Contempt, Sanctions and Joiner of additional parties. Which ever it was it was not filed on time unless there is a delay on showing up on PACER.

December 29, 2009, G. Ben Thompson filed an Objection to his attorney Mr. Joyce’s Withdrawal as attorney of Record of Thompson in the federal case of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley et al. I wonder if this is the reason that the Responses or Replies due on December 28 have not been filed?

On the Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern, TMZ, et. al. in the 80th District Court of Houston, signed an Order yesterday on December 28 giving the Plaintiff Leave (permission) to file the late documents in response to CBS Motion for Summary Judgment, and also giving CBS Request to supplemental their evidence for the Summary Judgment we should have a copy of this later today for your downloading pleasure. This Order appears to be no win or win for both Arthur and CBS, the new judge is allowing both of them to supplement their filings in reference to CBS Motion for Summary Judgment.

Tomorrow we will list the five cases we feel was the worse or the most bizarre, we would like to hear which ones you found that way. You can use the archive months found on the right hand side of the main pages for you to do a quick review to pick the five you want to list.

On December 31 we will list the five cases that we feel were the best of the cases or had something unusual happened during that case that changed the dynamics of that case. Again we would like for you to list your cases you thought was best of had something unusual that changed the dynamics.

I will have a short article up later today with links to some of the documents and some musings on who and who not are looking forward to television reality series or be part of a documentaries, it will surprise you we think.

Thanks for flying Rose Speaks.com and by the New Year the changes will be complete on what you will find an easier way to navigate easier.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
December 29, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

__

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 20 Comments »

Art Harris where have all of the hard drives gone Art Harris where have all of the hard drives gone

Folks I am just going to list the documents as they come in and are uploaded and let them speak for themselves because it appears this Appeal that has to be granted or denied by 5 PM today is going to create an onslaught of paperwork coming in to us throughout the day.

This will again end with a cliff hanger of will they or won’t they before 5 PM Grant the Emergency Stay so Art Harris does not have to answer those now eleven (11) infamous questions asked by the Special Master, Craig Ball.

September 11, 2009 Art Harris’ letter to Texas Supreme Court listing filings that was walked to the Supreme Court early this morning.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2414.

September 11, 2009 Art Harris’ Motion to the Texas Supreme Court to ask for an Emergency Stay against answering the eleven (11) questions do today, the Request is asking the Supreme Court to Rule by 5 PM today CDT due to the deadline imposed by the Trial Court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2415.

September 11, 2009 Art Harris Appendix to Support his Motion for Emergency Stay by 5 PM CDT today in order to not comply with the Trial Court’s Order of the answering of the now infamous eleven (11) questions as Ordered by the Trial Court.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2416.

September 11, 2009 Art Harris Writ of Mandamus filed with the Texas Supreme Court this is asking the Supreme Court to rule on the pending Writ of Mandamus in the First Court of Appeals thus bypassing the First Court of Appeals.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2417.

September 11, 2009 Art Harris Volume seven filed with the Texas Supreme Court today, it is only adding to the six volumes filed with the First Court of Appeals and it appears to just be copies of all of the Motions and papers and Responses filed with the First Court of Appeals.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2418.

September 11, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Response to Art Harris Motion for Emergency Stay of the First Court of Appeals Decision and the trial Court Orders from August 28, 2009. Arthur explains why the Texas Supreme Court that there is no Emergency and asks the Texas Supreme Court to Deny Harris’ Motion.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2419.

Virgie Arthur filed a Corrected Version of her Response to Art Harris Motion for Emergency Stay of the First Court of Appeals Decision and the trial Court Orders from August 28, 2009. Arthur explains why the Texas Supreme Court that there is no Emergency and asks the Texas Supreme Court to Deny Harris’ Motion.

I have not been able to check out to see what the difference is since both are nineteen (19) pages long. So if you have downloaded the previous version you might want to download again to be sure you have the current version of her response. It is the same Download link.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2419.

September 11, 2009 Texas Supreme Court granted Art Harris’ Motion for an Emergency Stay and to review his Motion for Mandamus, it was granted at 4:55 PM CDT at the last five minutes before the court closed. I will look up the judge that signed it or one of you can look it up. This does not mean that they are going to hear it; just they are freezing everything until they have time to look at all 7 volumes of filings and exhibits. The Emergency Stay only applies to Art Harris and none of the Pro Se litigants.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2420.

©Rose Turner
September 11, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 136 Comments »

Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith