I want to thank y’all for the outpouring of love and support being shown towards Rose during this time, especially after learning yesterday from the doctor about the serious downturn in her health. We are deeply touched that not only has it come from the members of the blog here but it also seems that no matter what side of this case you fall upon, there is well wishes and prayers being sent her way. Thank you again.
Many of you have reached out and offered to help with the site any way you can, here is what we need:
1. Public Forum Moderators (you will have control of the forums and the topics…where and what is discussed…. And we will stay off of the forums and out of your way. We will support you and your decisions 100%).
2. Site Moderators. Right now there are three and it is hard now that we are not on the board as much for them to do this. If you are interested in helping contact Roxanne @ rosespeaks.com, Heath @ rosespeaks.com, Daisy @ rosespeaks.com or myself, webmaster @ rosespeaks.com.
3. Chat moderators. Liann has stepped forward and offered to do that, thanks Liann. Hopefully the chat will become more active with the friendship and chats available, Rose will drop in as she feels up to it.
4. Writers. We of course need writers for articles.
Rose has made a list of cases y’all are following:
Birkhead vs. Opri, Opri vs. Birkhead in Los Angeles
California state vs. Stern, Dr. Kapoor and Dr. Eroshevich
Casey Anthony, everything to do with the Florida case
Dr. Cyril H. Wecht new trial in Penn.
DC Madame and her estate
USA vs. Lori Drew (in federal court in California - cyber stalking)
USA vs. Hollywood Madam, Michelle Braun
Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley
Howard K. Stern vs. Mark Speer and Jackie Hatten in California civil court
Howard K. Stern vs. Rita Cosby and Hachette Books in New York
Susan Carnaby vs. Harris County Police dept in shooting death of alleged CIA operative
All of the multiple cases in different jurisdictions on the Anna Nicole Smith Estate.
Arthur vs. Stern, TMZ, et. in state court in Houston Texas
I am sure there is more but these are the cases Rose’s Computer shows that she is following.
I will continue to get the papers from the various jurisdictions and court filings and continue to code them in for downloading.
The RoseSpeaks YouTube channel will continue to be maintained and updated as new videos are received. We have a volunteer helping us with it.
Again our thanks for the outpouring of love and support, from all sides of all the cases we are following. As we know more, I will post updates as I am able to here on the board.
Rose wants the site to continue, as do those of us behind the scenes. Y’all have put a lot of work into the site and I believe we can keep it going.
As Rose and I have said many times, thanks for flying Rose Speaks, we enjoy every minute of it.
Ken, Rose and all of your overworked moderators/admins.
Howard K. Stern has moved up his arraignment date to April 7, the same day as Dr. Khristine Eroshevich is scheduled to be arraigned. This is good news, in my opinion, as the two defense teams might be able to help each other prepare and go through all of the evidence Danny Santiago and unnamed investigators accumulated in just a tad over two years including the lists and statements of everyone Mr. Santiago and/or others interviewed.
Then there will be the preliminary hearing within 10 court days to “show probable cause”, (since this was a Warrant and not a grand jury indictment the defense teams get a lot more lead way in the preliminary hearing), which will be on or no later than April 22. This hearing must not be later than ten court days after the arraignment per California statute.
The prosecutor must prove all charges and conduct enhancements against the defendants at the preliminary hearing. Howard K. Stern’s legal team, led by Steven H. Sadow of Atlanta Georgia, and Dr. Khristine Eroshevich’s attorney, Adam Braun, will get to cross examine any witnesses and challenge the evidence against either of them at this hearing. The defense team can also file motions to suppress evidence against either of them, remember after the April 7 hearing will be the first time either defendants’ defense team will be granted full access to all of the evidence. However at the preliminary hearing both defendants’ legal team are restricted by Penal Code section 866. The legal teams are only allowed to put on evidence that will establish an affirmative defense, negate an element of the crime charged (I. E. intent for a crime as is charged in this case), and they will also be allowed to impeach the testimony of witnesses.
If the judge determines that the prosecution has presented sufficient evidence to hold both Stern and Dr. Eroshevich, the threshold is not like that at a trial it is much lower for the judge, for trial, following the arraignment and preliminary hearing the judges in California criminal courts normally will then order both to appear for a “second arraignment” on a charging document known as an “information.” That arraignment must occur within 15 days of the conclusion of their preliminary hearing which would be on or before May 7.
Stern and Dr. Eroshevich can ask for a “speedy trial”, which must begin within 60 calendar days from the second arraignment date “document of information hearing”, which would be by July 7, 2009.
It seems to me both want to get this started so their defense teams with their investigators, we don’t know the names of Stern’s investigators, but Dr. Eroshevich’s investigators will be headed up by John J. Nazarian P. I. and his firm Nazarian and Associates, can begin to research the witnesses, interview them, find out who all the state investigators (Danny Santiago) has talked to and all records looked at that were included in the sworn statement of Mr. Santiago used when obtaining the warrants for arrests issued on March 12.
In other news Howard K. Stern won his hearing against Mark Speer on Friday March 27, and so that defamation case is going forward with discovery beginning now. I would think this hearing and beating the “anti slapp” statute of California is a big win and will strengthen Stern’s suit against Rita Cosby and Hachette Books.
It looks like it is going to be a busy spring and summer. We have new Casey Anthony papers up as well including the transcript of the interview with the private investigator, Dominic Casey whom worked for the George and Cindy Anthony family. There are the statements of Roy Kronk and Mr. Hoover the photographer that was in the area and filmed Mr. Casey in November 2008 in the same location where Caylee’s remains were later found. We will try to have all of these coded for you to download later today.
There are also new filings in the Roland Carnaby case that needs to be coded in and then you can look at some of the people listed as witnesses in the civil rights violation trial including the ex-president, the first President Bush.
Lastly, we are waiting on the Phil Spector trial verdict as well, that case was given to the jury on March 26, and we look forward to Sprocket’s coverage of the verdict when it comes in.
Lot’s of papers to read and lots of trials to follow. We look forward to your input on these cases with good discussions of the facts and documents.
This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
ET reported yesterday that Atlanta Georgia Criminal power house attorney, Steven H. Sadow will lead the criminal defense for Howard K. Stern in the California felony charges Mr. Stern is facing. In an interview with ET Online Steven H. Sadow stated; “Despite Mr. Stern’s lack of financial resources, I welcome the opportunity to travel across the country to lead this defense team of professionals dedicated to the representation of an innocent man. This unjust prosecution threatens not only Mr. Stern, it also threatens physician-patient relationships and the efforts of individuals to assist loved ones, particularly celebrities, in protecting their privacy while receiving medical care and treatment ordered by their physicians.”
Although Mr. Sadow will take the lead of the team, defense attorney J. Christopher Smith of Los Angeles, California as well as Civil litigators L. Lin Wood of Atlanta, Georgia and Mrs. Mary Krista Barth of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida will be assisting in the defense of Howard K. Stern.
Mrs. Mary Barth is the one that went around the globe this past week on TMZ courtesy of one of the you tube sites showing Mrs. Barth being seen out with a group of people having a great time. Larry Birkhead was also in her group of friends enjoying themselves. Wonder what Mary Barth had to celebrate this past weekend? We can only hope it is something good for her client, Mr. Stern. I do wonder though why any lawyer would be caught on camera at a known paparazzi hang out, just days after a client she has stood by so gallantly for over 2 years had the worse thing to happen since the death of Anna Nicole and Daniel Smith.
Nazarian and Associates, led by John J. Nazarian P. I. had been retained by Howard K. Stern’s California criminal defense team led by J Christopher Smith just recently, as well as Dr. Khristine Eroshevich legal team led by Adam Braun following the arrest of Howard K. Stern. Rumor has it that Nazarian and Associates had been representing Mr. Stern at a reduced rate the past two years, but Mr. Nazarian had the standard “No Comment” when we asked him today. Mr. Nazarian however did confirm he will continue to work with Adam Braun to clear Dr. Eroshevich.
What ever the reason John J. Nazarian and Nazarian and Associates resigned yesterday from representing Howard K. Stern in any matters related to his multiple jurisdictions civil cases as well as his felony case pending in California.
The good news for us is that perhaps Mr. Nazarian can now begin to attend some of the hearings and share his thoughts with us as well as his perspective on these people who most of us will never meet but for some reason we have become enthralled with all things Anna Nicole Smith for the last 2+ years.
I can think of a few more high profile cases I would like to ask Mr. Nazarian’s take as a P. I. on those, like Casey Anthony, and Roland Carnaby to just name two cases we are watching.
To Read Mr. Nazarian’s public statement, called “Exiting the Bull Ride” visit his site:
This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
It felt surreal to me on Sunday night, March 15 watching Geraldo At Large. Judge Larry Seidlin must be having the carrot of a show dangled in his face. At least Geraldo stroked his ego by loving the “metaphors” that Judge Seidlin talked in and just saying Judge Seidlin, “You should have your own show”.
What came next? The ex-judge, acting a tad flattered, went into detail about the “poker hand” he played with Howard K. Stern. Seidlin went so far as to say he knowingly and gleefully entrapped Howard K. Stern on national TV so that the testimony could be used later in criminal investigations. You know, like the one AG Jerry Brown has hitched his star to a potential governorship on. We now have a Judge confessing that he knowingly led a line of questioning to entrap someone during a civil proceeding to be used later in a criminal proceeding. Take a minute and just think about that. WOW! You can hardly get your head around that.
Larry Seidlin went into detail that Howard K. Stern did not even need to be at the burial custody hearing, because the crying judge had Larry Birkhead. Seidlin goes on to describe how he played a poker hand on national TV inviting Howard K. Stern to his court room. Ah the glee, Stern answers your questions, he answers other lawyers’ questions, trying to be honest and all the time you were premeditatedly setting him up. You must go to bed real proud of this “change” from the ruling that Stern was the most believable of the lot of people in your court room in February 2007. Now we have you confessed to your own craftiness of entrapping what appeared to most of us to be a grieving man. I remember when you said you wanted Stern in your courtroom to look him in the face, eye to eye, not video or telephone, you wanted to look each of these people in the face so you got a feel for them. You also openly admit you are always looking down the road at the” big picture” and never just at what is at hand. Stern could take the chance of not burying Anna Nicole Smith where she wanted to be buried, as the nominated executor of her Will, and filing the paperwork with the M. E. office, Dr. Joshua Perper, and stayed at home, or come to your court and be honest in front of a world television crowd.
I did some brief research and Seidlin, the weeping judge, that took what should have been a three hour hearing and turned it into how many days, seems to know what he is talking about. It would appear that anything Stern said during that hearing under oath can now be used in criminal proceedings in California. Now that is mind boggling, we all hear the tales of police tricking suspects into confessing whether guilty of not, but to hear a judge say he did this, and looking so proud as he gleefully takes the credit. Your wife and young child must be so proud. Why did this judge go from the night before, saying there was a rough climb for the prosecution, to now tonight saying, “Hey look at me, I tricked him, he and his lawyers were too stupid to plead the 5th during a civil hearing”. So like a turkey on Thanksgiving all trussed up and waiting for AG Jerry Brown to just see the truth. You have to wonder what happened in that twenty four hours to get Seidlin to not only totally change his take on things but to take credit that he alone tricked Stern. I guess we all need to watch and see if the sly old judge announces a new show on Fox in the future. Have any of you looked up to see whether this judge could entrap any of these people over the objections of their lawyers and asking his own questions. Then it was Seidlin that said the words that were taken and ran with for 2 years, perhaps one could “say Howard K. Stern was an enabler”.
At the end of the day or the end of two years, the only person not attempting to sell their soul for ratings is Dr. Perper. He has remained strong, convinced and confident in his findings and that the cause of Anna Nicole Smith’s death could not have been determined without the help of Dr. Khristine Eroshevich. The night before Dr. Perper had finally hollered over Geraldo’s agenda and said that the cause of death would have never been found without Dr. Eroshevich telling him about the pain in the buttocks and to test for Chloral Hydrate. In the end it is Dr. Perper who seems to be unflappable in his findings and opinions. Seidlin appears to be one more talking pundit up for sale. Can an ex-judge be called to testify at the debacle in California if these charges even get to trial? Does Seidlin have immunity as an ex-judge now that he has happily, like a child at Christmas taken credit for “setting” Stern up?
Then you have Kimberly Guilfoyle openly admitting that one of the reasons that Casey Anthony will be convicted is partially on the fact the public “just don’t like her”. Ah Ms. Guilfoyle did you not know that as a career of a talking pundit, that would be you doing your damnedest to keep a job. Your job is destroying people in public with no thought of innocence or guilt, only of ratings for some sick infotainment show with Geraldo. By the way Geraldo I predict will have his contract not renewed if FOX has to tighten their belt in this recession. Perhaps Seidlin will get Geraldo’s time slot.
However we all know about “public perception”, don’t we, and using that to drive ratings. I will never forget watching Court TV in the spring of 2007 and Jami Floyd openly talking about the anti-Semitism that were occurring in the staff meetings as they met to discuss that day’s shows. If you remember correctly she is the only one that was not ready to get the white sheets and the rope out and tie Stern to the nearest tree in a good old fashion hanging.
One last question for those of you with Hollywerid connections, how often to you see a celebrity picking up their dry cleaning or stopping by the pharmacy? In fact does AG Jerry Brown even do that? I guess I was under the misconception that every day in Hollyweird to protect the right of privacy of celebrities, that ALL have employees who are expected to do these type of errands. If they do, then Hollyweird is in danger with AG Brown newest cause. Who said by giving that news conference he himself had jeopardized the case, ah yes Lisa Bloom on Larry King Live, Friday March 13.
What a mess we have here, weeping judges confessing to entrapment; pundits wondering if this story can be resurrected after two years for ratings; and an old politician reaching for the brass ring of fame via Anna Nicole Smith to once again claim the governorship of California. So many people with so many agendas and none of them about truth and justice, makes me proud of our legal system today, NOT!!!
Howard K. Stern has retained J. Christopher Smith a dynamo black criminal attorney from the San Jose area, “understated and well-studied” as one blog put it and brilliant. How ironic that Howard K. Stern facing 2 years of anti-Semitism in the press and on forums, hires a minority brilliant lawyer. Folks this is going to get interesting.
This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
In what is becoming more of a how she looks and acts versus the evidence or lack thereof, it gives us all time to pause and wonder why? Is Casey Anthony going to be convicted because the public does not like her?
The duct tape had no finger prints, and hundreds of thousands of homes has the same brand of duct tape, perhaps including your home. The only matching duct tape found at the Anthony’s home was a small piece on a can of gasoline in an outside shed. My husband tells me this is very common in most of our homes especially because you mix oil with gasoline for almost anything you use in the yard, from lawn mowers, to weed eaters to chain saws, but if you put that same combination of mixture in your car, there would be a serious problem. So does that one strip of duct tape added to no finger prints on the duct tape surrounding this poor child skull equate to murder?
Then you have the air analysis on the car, the first place it was sent to in Florida, that the Sheriff’s department picked came back negative. Not to be deterred the Orange county Sheriff’s department sent a sample to the Tennessee body farm where the ORNL is located nearby, which trains law enforcement and almost always testifies for the prosecution and never for a defendant found something, or did they? Viola, you have a report of decomposition in the car! However even the body farm says it is better stated as “It Could be that”. Something most scientists are now referring to “junk science”, [full press release], but because we don’t like how Casey Anthony looks and acts is that enough to convict her of murder?
There is now the infamous unfeeling June 21st entry in Casey’s diary, nothing but a cold blooded parent could have written that just days after their daughter had disappeared but that ends up not being 2008 but from a 2003 Diary entry. By the way who leaked that to the media and why did Nancy Grace cover that up from her viewers at first? So is the diary entry now proved bogus enough to convict Casey Anthony or will she be convicted because she did not act right and we don’t like her looks?
Roy Kronk, not exactly the hero we all thought he was when we found out he is a dead beat dad, being looked for by the Maryland state child support enforcement agency. Kronk turned over $5,000.00 of the $7,000.00 allegedly paid to him by ABC for the rattlesnake picture and says that Maryland can garnish his wages in Florida for the rest of the over $10,000.00 he still owes his children. With Roy Kronk we have the new facts that the first two times he called in the black bag with the white “skull” or something that looked like a human skull, he was with two friends, fellow workers with him when he made the “gruesome discovery”. Roy Kronk made this discovery of the black bag with the skull on his first day on that particular route. Per the Orange County Sheriff report dated February 5, these three guys were even talking on that 11th day of August 2008 about where would Casey dumped the body of her daughter. Roy admits “he and his friends were talking about the theory of where Casey may have disposed of Caylee since this was a high profile news story and they were around the corner from the Anthony’s residence.” Kronk did not say, “Could a missing child be in those woods”, it was did “Casey disposed of her daughter, Caylee Anthony’s remains” from day one, it appears by Kronk’s statements. Roy Kronk became fascinated with the black bag and the human skull. Two of his fellow meter readers were with him, see page 7-9 on report of the interviews], one remembers Roy pointing out the black bag and saying “Hey look there is a human skull there”, but that man did not see the black bag and the skull that Roy was pointing to and after they found and killed the rattlesnake, the snake became the focus of these three guys conversation and the human skull and the black bag was forgotten over the excitement of a rattlesnake. One of the guys took it, the now dead rattlesnake, home and put it in the freezer. Neither of them remembers Roy Kronk calling the sheriff’s office both days. You would think a black bag with a human skull in plain site might have the possibility that it would stick in your mind if your fellow worker thought it was serious enough to make three reports on it in three consecutive days. Perhaps though the trophy of a rattlesnake was more important then the black bag that Roy could see with what looked like a human skull. On the third call Kronk was alone, and a sheriff’s deputy came out and spent 25 minutes talking to Kronk and walking the area of the black bag with the human skull visible to Roy, but saw nothing and noted that the area had been previously searched and “cleared”. That deputy has now been reassigned.
Thank God Roy Kronk would not be deterred from the nagging black bag with the human skull and so he went back on December 11 for a fourth time and found the remains of Caylee Anthony exactly and unmoved from where he first viewed the black bag with the skull on August 11. Roy Kronk found what no search team, no homeless person sleeping there during the many months it was dry before and after Caylee Anthony disappeared, nor the kids that use that area as a well known “party place”.
How much more those remains could have told the Medical Examiner in August then they could in December. Oh and in case you didn’t read the documents Kronk at first if you remember said he picked up the black bag or poked it with a meter reader stick and out falling to the ground was the gruesome skull, only that is not quite what happened. The sheriff’s department had to go back to interview Kronk and “straighten up his faulty memory” because there was no way that skull rolled out of that black bag on that December day as Roy recounted many times, why you ask, because it had made an indention on the dirt where it had laid. Wonder if Kronk will be called as a witness now? However, back to our questions, we like Kronk so a couple of lies from him is no big deal, right, but we don’t like the way Casey Anthony looks or how she acts so will we convict her?
Most of us learned along the way about the “black prince” as Court TV nicknamed Howard K. Stern, he did not look right, people didn’t like the way he looked or acted so he had to be guilty of something right? We all know by now that all Howard K. Stern was and will ever be found guilty of is useful fodder for cable 24/7 “infotainment” passed off as cable news. Just one more life ruined for the advertising dollar and the ratings game. Sadly the Anna Nicole Smith story is old news, I sincerely hope that Howard K. Stern takes Rita Cosby all the way to trial, it will never give him his good name back but it will lay bare the naked truth for all of those who labeled him because they just did not like how he looks and the world might learn a tad more about 24 hours “infotainment” passed off as cable news.
However, Howard K. Stern is last year’s bottom line fodder for these hungry sharks that spin they have the truth every night for nothing more than mere advertising dollars and ratings so it is time for “them” to move on and put Casey Anthony under that same microscope of that same infotainment cable news.
I have no way of knowing if Casey Anthony is innocent of her child’s death or not, but I know she has been convicted and made ready for a public hanging for no more then ratings. Will we convict her because we don’t like the way she looks or acts? However, like rabid frothing dogs or people demanding a kill at Rome’s Coliseum from thousands of years ago, can we change and look beyond what is fed us for ratings? God I hope so.
Visit the Rose Speaks tube tube channel and watch again ALL of the videos about the Anthony case and think real hard might she be convicted not on facts, but by a public so fed infotainment that we simply do not like the way she looks or acts?
Pick up the papers on the Casey Anthony case in our download section, broken down in sections and interviews in easier to understand pieces we hope. The download section is opened to All not just members of Rose Speaks.com. Please take the time to do your own research and don’t bite the apple of the infotainment industry, they views lives as expendable for ratings.
This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
In the ever swirling of tabloid infotainment passed off as news, did Casey Anthony murder her child, Caylee Anthony? We are going to be looking at some hard evidence from the FBI and the CSI about what was found and what it means.
As Geraldo says, the jail house videos are a disgraced and a way to try to get around having Casey Anthony’s lawyer present, yes I am agreeing with Geraldo again.
Greta Van Susteren goes through the crime scene AGAIN, on her show Greta - On the Record, but recorded information via documented reports shows that spot was searched in detail at least 7-9 times before the remains were found. Why did no one spot them then and retrieve them before more evidence could be lost?
Greta Van Susteren interviews both Dr. Baden and Mark Fuhrman about the case and why if the bag had been there since June 2008 were all of the remains and other items still intact. Greta brings out that there are rodents, raccoons, etc. all which creates havoc for people who have their garbage in air tight bags and in a trash can that is sealed and still raccoons get into the trash and spread it in the neighborhood. I don’t watch Greta but her walk through the area and the interviews with the questions is something I hope we see more of in the twenty hour infotainment passed as news.
Casey Anthony’s legal teams have some words about how the case is being handled. My question is if the D. A. has a tight sure thing circumstantial evidence case then why try it in the media knowing they are tainting a jury pool, not only from anywhere in Florida but anywhere in the U. S.?
Later today there will be a new article up debunking the myths of the talking pundits with the actual FBI and CSI reports. They paint a much different picture then what is being spun in the infotainment world. Some of the hints we will have documented statements that question these reasoning, involves Casey Anthony’s car and the evidence showing a decomposing body was in the trunk; the duct tape found around the skull and at the home of George and Cindy Anthony’s home; the diary entry claiming to be Casey’s and dated right after the disappearance of Caylee Anthony; and the heart found on the duct tape and in the home of the Anthony’s. We try to deal in facts here not spin.
We are loading the latest FBI and CSI reports to day so we can make reference to them in our next article; we feel you might be surprised between what is hype and what is factual.
It is great to have a site with intelligent bloggers who will look at the hard evidence and then comment and not follow the “sheep mentality crowd” whom never research but just assume that infotainment is the truth. The ole if it is on Nancy Grace, Geraldo or Greta then it must be true. We have all learned the fallacy of that by following the attempted lynching of Howard K. Stern.
Stay tuned for two more articles today, both debunking cases that have taken on lives of their own in the world of ratings equal advertising dollars equals talking pundits on infotainment spreading their word as the absolute truth.
We will also have another article on the filings by Howard K. Stern with more of the excerpts of the deposition of the four filed in error for nine hours by Rita Cosby’s attorney, Elizabeth McNamara.
Remember the documents relating to the Casey Anthony case is opened to ALL not just members of Rose Speaks.com.
Rose Speaks.com also now has it’s own you tube channel be sure and visit it for videos on a lot of the cases we cover, that old saying a picture is worth a thousand words. We try to bring you the pictures, documents and words.
This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
We hope you are enjoying the new forums format. It will give all of you a lot of new features and the ability to start your own threads, have avatars you pick, etc. Never fear though the members only forums will remain in tact for all of you regular posters.
We are currently following the Casey Anthony Case, Roland Carnaby Case, and the Stern vs. Cosby case. If there is something you want us to look at please let us know. If you want to make notes on any of these cases and send them to us to go in an article that would be GREAT. If you want to write an article we welcome your talents.
There are a few bugs to still be worked out in the new forums, so let us know what you find as you find it so Ken can fix those problems. We hope the new forums moves faster in loading and being able to respond then the blog is at times.
There will be a new article up on Roland Carnaby today, with a lot of information on who he was and who he knew.
We are getting the documents from Casey Anthony as they are released by the Orange County D. A. today as well as the pictures being released and will have those up to download as the day goes forward.
We will have another article up today as well in comparing the declarations that Howard K. Stern filed in his Response to Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Rita Cosby and Hachette. If there is a declaration you want us to look at and then go back in the files and pull the relevant information as we have done with the Larry Birkhead’s declaration let us know.
We have been so busy on the site that I have yet to read all of the declarations released by Stern’s legal team in the New York case yet, but from what many of you are saying they promise to be good, factual and enlightening.
As always thanks for flying Rose Speaks.com and keep the suggestions coming, we really want to make this a user friendly site for all of you no matter which case you might be interested in reading about.
Ken, Rose and all of your volunteer admins/moderators
February 18, 2009
This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Entries (RSS)