The newest nine papers filed in the Texas State Court lawsuit that we have access to, are now up. ALL OF THE EMAILS IN ANY OF THE EXHIBITS REQUESTING PRODUCTIONS OF PERSON’S PRIVATE EMAIL HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND THOSE PAGES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE EXHIBITS BEFORE I UPLOADED THEM ALSO MOST OF THE NAMES OF INDIVIDUALS HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR THE PAGES THEY ARE ON HAVE BEEN REMOVED WHERE WE COULD AND STILL KEEP THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION IN TACT. If you see something additionally that should be redacted please email us and we will redact those as well.

Howard K. Stern’s Response to Virgie Arthur’s Opposition has a couple of new and interesting facts alleged.

Virgie Arthur filed a Second Amended Original Petition has been filed with the latest alleged new facts and attempting to add Larry Birkhead as a defendant but the date to join additional parties was December 1. There is no way to predict if the Court will allow additional joiner of parties this late lawsuit.

The rest as you know we cannot comment on because one of the co-owners of Rose Speaks.com is a defendant currently in the lawsuit.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&cid=22.

©Rose Turner
December 11, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Howard K Stern, Larry Birkhead, Lyndal Harrington, Nelda "Rose" Turner, Nelda Turner, Rose Turner, Teresa Stephens, Virgie Arthur

Rose Speaks.com cannot comment on documents which were released to another site; we cannot comment on how the other site received those documents except to state that those documents are not listed on the Harris County Clerk’s site with the case number of this suit available for purchase by the public as of today December 5.

We have worked very hard to achieve an Agreed Protective Order with all of the parties, Plaintiff Virgie Arthur, Defendants Harvey Levin/TMZ, Teresa Stephens, Howard K. Stern, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, Lyndal Harrington and myself. Our lawyers have worked since August it was agreed by all parties and signed by the Judge on December 3. That Agreed Order is up on the Harris County Court site as a public document that anyone can purchase at $1.00 a page as any of the public filings can be purchased for $1.00 per page, something Rose Speaks.com can sadly not afford to do.

We fought for this Agreed Protective Order just so what is happening on that other site and now Topix.net would not occur including the feeding frenzy we have been told about that began last evening, December 4. We have fought for the privacy of all bloggers, we will continue to fight for the privacy of all bloggers while we also continue to cooperate with every discovery request we have received. We will continue to cooperate and follow both our lawyer’s instructions as well as the Court’s Orders.

Therefore, we are at a disadvantage here; we will abide by the Court’s Order signed on December 3, we do not have any idea how the other site ended up with a Motion to Compel dated December 3, which is not available to the public through normal avenues as far as we know.

This will be the only statement we will or can make; we intend to abide by the letter, as well as the spirit, of the Agreed Protective Order as agreed to by the parties and signed by the Court. As with all of our transparency including this case when we receive a copy of that Order since it is public we will have it in our download section.

We deeply apologize for any hurt/pain, panic or betrayal you have felt by the documents released and the requests in that Motion to Compel that appears to be based on an old member list of another site.

Please respect the position of both the spirit and the actual Order signed by the Court. We will have nothing further to say on why this was released, who might have released it and why what is happening on Topix because of this Motion to Compel being released with exhibits. We are sure if any violations of the Court’s Instruction or Orders have occurred that the site owner that received those papers will be more than happy to appear in court and answer any and all questions that might be asked. Including how these papers were received if not through the public avenues such as the Harris County Court’s URL of: https://e-docs.hcdistrictclerk.com/eDocs.Web/Login.aspx.

We want to thank each of your for the outpouring of concern as to how this happened and we know that you all will respect the fact that we cannot discuss any of this.

As always, thanks for flying Rose Speaks.com, we will have a new article up and several new cases to follow as well as a new public section of the site announced shortly.

Ken and Rose, co-owners of the site, and all of your admins/moderators who put in countless numbers of hours to make the site run as smoothly as it does.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, Harvey Levin, Havana, Howard K Stern, Lyndal Harrington, Nelda "Rose" Turner, QV, Rose Turner, Teresa Stephens, TMZ.com, Virgie Arthur, Von

In the Southern District Federal Court for Florida, on Friday, October 17, Krista Barth and Robert Klein squared off and argued on behalf of their clients for an hour and half.

The hearing was in connection to John O’Quinn and the O’Quinn Law Firm Motion for Protective Order for the financial information with the O’Quinn legal team wanting to wait until 30 days before trial to turn that information over. The O’Quinn legal team is also requesting that Howard K. Stern does not have access to the information because Stern “can’t be trusted”. The Minutes of the Court Proceeding states the Court read the Motions, Memorandum of Law submitted by both side, had the hearing and took the matter under consideration and will issue an opinion in the near future.

In other news the Southern District Federal Court of Texas, issued an Order for a November 4 hearing on the status of the case, and the discovery progress in that case between the parties. That hearing is scheduled for November 4 at 4:00 PM.

The Texas State District Court in Houston, the Honorable Tony Lindsey issued an Order on October 15 setting a hearing on the Motions for Art Harris and Bonnie Stern to hear oral arguments on the Jurisdictional issues brought up by the co-defendants. That hearing per the Court Docket, is set for 1:30 PM on November 21, however the court has also issued in its Order that the parties may request a hearing sooner then November 21.

Howard K. Stern’s Answer to the O’Quinn’s Motion for Summary Judgment based on Stern is a public figure and as such cannot prove “malicious intent”, still appears to be due on October 27.

The New York Federal Court has Order that all depositions of the last five witnesses, Don Clark, Wilma Vicedomine, Mark Speer, and both nannies must be completed by Monday, October 20 in preparation for that trial.

In the Federal Court for South Carolina of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson and Stancil Ford Shelley, there are two filings due, one by Monday October 20, 2008 of the Rule 26(f). The other required filings in the South Carolina Federal Court are due on November 3, 2008 and includes the Rule 26 & 26 (a).

It looks like October and November is going to be two months of many happenings in all cases, in all jurisdictions with filings due and hearings happening. Be sure to keep up with our calendar on the front page of Rose Speaks.com as we keep up with all upcoming dates in all of these cases.

I will have the debunking of the blond ambitious, Rita Cosby, chapter 13 part 2 up tomorrow and I will also have my predictions about the upcoming trial of Howard K. Stern vs. Rita Cosby and Hachette Books.

©Rose Turner
October 19, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Bill Ogden, Bonnie Stern, CBS, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Chip Babrock, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Entertainment Tonight, Harvey Levin, Howard K Stern, John "Jay" Patton, John O'Quinn, Ken and Rose Turner, Krista Barth, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Mark Speer, Nancy Hamilton, Neil McCabe, Nicole Jennings Wade, Rita Cosby, Rose Turner, Teresa Stephens, The John O'Quinn Law Firm, Thomas Gregor, TMZ, TMZ.com, Tom Gregor, Virgie Arthur, William "Bill" Ogden, William Ogden, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicedomine

All of you have made some great suggestions, you can vote once a day in our new poll and leave comments here or in the private part of the blog for what you want to see covered.

We are please to announce the famous Sprocket, will be sharing her coverage of the retrying of Phil Spector with our readers here at Rose Speaks.com. Sprocket has become famous for her trial coverage as a blogger and even famous reporters tip their hats to her coverage of trials. She has been interviewed and written about by the ABA (American Bar Association), because of the quality of her trial coverage.

We are also starting at least one weekly chat on Sundays beginning today if you want to join us you are welcomed. They begin at 8 PM CDT (9 PM eastern, 6 PM pacific).

I will have an article up on September 1, on the Howard K. Stern vs. Rita Cosby and Hachette Books case and my own prediction of where this trial is going and how fast it is going to get there in my opinion. It will have a time line with it and I encourage all of you to read it and participate in the discussion.

A few comments here about emails sent to me over the last few days:

1. I have never taped anyone’s phone call to me or from me unless advised to by an attorney or law enforcement to do so, (I. E. a threat on our safety). Ad knows there are no taped phone calls of her and has known that for several months.

2. Even when this site has been breached and when it has been hacked, the database is backed up on a regular basis and is always intact and our computers are safe and protected and have not been hacked, not has any virus destroyed anything on our computers.

3. Finally look up the ethics of the law firm representing Rose Speaks.com. The ethics of those lawyers I hope speak volumes about the type of clients they take. I wonder how the April 19th hearing transcript that is being released on September 23 is going to be spun, to fit the “conspiracy concept” when everyone can see exactly what we offered.

Now please do not ask us to comment further on any of this, remember we are at a disadvantage in that we cannot address the negative things said about us right now. That is what being sued does, you cannot defend yourself in public, you have to have great faith in our legal system and that we do have.

©Rose Turner
August 31, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

A U. K. man, who claimed he was looking for UFO files lost his appeal not to be extradited from the U. K. to the U. S. to face trial and if convicted could face up to 70 years in prison.

The man admits he gained access to 97 computers from the bedroom of his girlfriend’s aunt’s house. He claims of he should not be prosecuted or extradited to stand trial is the fact he was able to access the computers “motivated only by curiosity and because of lax security”. That ole “excuse” of it is not my fault I was able to get in, it is their fault for not protecting the computers and servers better appears to be falling on deaf ears.

The US government says he stole passwords and deleted files. They have won the right to try him in the U. S. and he is expected to be extradited from his home country to face trial here in the U. S.

I wonder what would accessing an email server because the security did not prevent you from doing that from the luxury of your home, and stealing emails and in some cases passwords/identities from up to almost 50 accounts on an email server will play out? We shall see. My personal prediction is that it might not be what they did to Rose Speaks.com that. One of the worse things, in my opinion, was posted publicly in the last few days. It involved the unauthorized breach into an email account not connected to Rose Speaks.com, but sent from a politician’s government email address, which simply elected to “opt-out” of an email newsletter. This was from a site that happened to be on the same email server that houses Rose Speaks.com but was in no way connected to Rose Speaks.com. I think that might not be forgiven so easy. What are your thoughts, is it the person who “took the information because the security to too “lax”, or the people they are saying were “responsible for the lax security” fault?

The U. K. man admits he acted alone. In the breach of the 50 accounts on one email several people have admitted in participating, “just because they could and the security was too lax to prevent it”, is that a conspiracy?

We will be using the same password for a blog that addresses this article as we did for the Rose Speaks.com email breach article.

©Rose Turner
August 28, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

There will be a couple of articles coming up today, one is about the “unauthorized access” to the email server of Rose Speaks.com in an easy to understand article. Why Clues should do some reading and not be clueless with special thanks to Red of the Red Couch coming up for making all of this so easy. Thanks Clueless and Red but ya’ll might want to let your fingers do some walking to find out that having a forum on an overseas server just makes you that much easier to prosecute. A hint how much does a good defense lawyer cost?

We will even have easy to understand follow the graphics, [like follow the bouncing ball], with the new article. It isn’t nice to scare and cause intentional emotional distress to the innocent bloggers who are members of Rose Speaks.com.

Stay tuned folks for those who are screaming like Clueless of, “So sceeeerrredd, sssshhhaaaking!!” You do not know how true that is.

Ya’ll are going to love our latest expose and who is who and what the penalty really is, as much as we can share without hampering an investigation and possible indictments.

We will also have a new article about our friend Paul Barresi and an article with a “prediction” by John J. Nazarian you do not want to miss any of these three newest articles.

©Rose Turner
August 16, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Case filed on August 4, 2008, in South Carolina Federal Court in Horry County South Carolina. The Honorable Terry L Wooten is presiding.

The federal Court files shows Diversity-Conversion - Torts - Property - Other Personal Property Damage. Howard K. Stern asks for Jury trial.

Local South Carolina attorneys, Karl Alan Folkens and Louis David Nettles with Folkens Law Firm in Florence, SC., represent the Estate of Anna Nicole and Executor Howard K. Stern. L. Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, and Nicole Jennings Wade of Powell Goldstein of Atlanta Georgia have pending Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate and Executor of the Estate, Howard K. Stern. In filings on August 4, 2008, the court was also notified that M. Krista Barth of Florida would be filing for Pro Hac Vice status before the South Carolina Federal Court.

The Original Complaint filed on August 4 also indicates that other persons will be added to the lawsuit at a future date.

The first 7 documents are up to download for All, not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

I will have a new article up on these legal documents later today

Stay tuned folks this is going to be quite a ride.

Pass word blog is at the URL: http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=408.

©Rose Turner
August 5, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.