In the Howard K. Stern vs. Rita Cosby and Hachette Books, on December 11, 2008, there was a letter addressed to Judge Denny Chin from Elizabeth A. McNamara requesting the Court for permission to file Motion for Summary Judgment for Rita Cosby and Hachette Books under seal. The Court DENIED the request to file the papers under seal “except that the parties may file a set of papers publicly, with confidential exhibits omitted and references to any confidential matters redacted, with a second complete and unredacted set that will be filed under sealed”.

Looks like the New York Court is going to allow us to see publicly some of the information that Cosby and Hachette is attempting to show in the Motions for Summary Judgment due to the Court by December 15.

What do you think we will be allowed to see and gleam for the filings due on Monday? Debunking chapter 13 will be up this weekend, lot’s to discuss in this case as well as several others we are following.

Remember that ALL documents filed in this case are in our download section, opened to ALL not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

©Rose Turner
December 13, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Barth, Bryan Cave LLP, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Douglas Maynard, Elizabeth McNamara, Howard K Stern, Jack Harding, Jackie Hatten, Jay Patton, John Patton, Krista, L. Lin Wood, Larry Birkehead, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Nicole Jennings Wade, Powell Goldstein LLP, Rita Cosby, Tom Bednarek

The newest nine papers filed in the Texas State Court lawsuit that we have access to, are now up. ALL OF THE EMAILS IN ANY OF THE EXHIBITS REQUESTING PRODUCTIONS OF PERSON’S PRIVATE EMAIL HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND THOSE PAGES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE EXHIBITS BEFORE I UPLOADED THEM ALSO MOST OF THE NAMES OF INDIVIDUALS HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR THE PAGES THEY ARE ON HAVE BEEN REMOVED WHERE WE COULD AND STILL KEEP THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION IN TACT. If you see something additionally that should be redacted please email us and we will redact those as well.

Howard K. Stern’s Response to Virgie Arthur’s Opposition has a couple of new and interesting facts alleged.

Virgie Arthur filed a Second Amended Original Petition has been filed with the latest alleged new facts and attempting to add Larry Birkhead as a defendant but the date to join additional parties was December 1. There is no way to predict if the Court will allow additional joiner of parties this late lawsuit.

The rest as you know we cannot comment on because one of the co-owners of Rose Speaks.com is a defendant currently in the lawsuit.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&cid=22.

©Rose Turner
December 11, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Howard K Stern, Larry Birkhead, Lyndal Harrington, Nelda "Rose" Turner, Nelda Turner, Rose Turner, Teresa Stephens, Virgie Arthur

This article will be enlarged tonight with more of my thoughts about these Motions coming up and what we will be allowed to see.

We now have the rules for the Motion for Summary Judgment to be filed by Rita Cosby and Hachette Books and the Reply of Howard K. Stern to those Motions. Wonder if this is why we have those seven pages released from the Florida suit on Don Clark.

On December 2, 2008, New York Southern District Federal Court sets page limits on Rita Cosby’s Motion for Summary to 50 from the normal 25 Judgment and then Howard K. Stern’s reply can be 75 pages; Hachette intends to use the 25-page limit per the Civil Rules of Procedures.

So now, our attention shifts in part to the New York as Florida is officially closed even on PACER as of today.

I think now is a time to debunk the rest of chapter 13 of the real blond ambitious, Rita Cosby.

You can find all of the documents in our download section, opened to all not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

©Rose Turner
December 2, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Douglas Manynard, Elizabeth McNamara, Howard K Stern, Jack Harding, John Patton, Krista Barth, L. Lin Wood, Larry Birkhead, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Mark Speer, Nicole Jennings Wade, O'Quinn's Don Clark Ex-FBI, Randy Scott Zelin, Rita Cosby, Tom Bednarek, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicecomine

G. Ben Thompson missed the filing date the Court set of November 3 for his mandatory filing of the Rule 26 f of initial disclosures, also Howard K. Stern’s attorney pointed out that due to Thompson’s attorney being ill they had not been able to hold the required conference via phone.

The Court approved Susan Brown to represent Ben Thompson. Howard K. Stern has attorneys approved for Pro Hac Vice status, including Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Nicole Jennings Wade of Powell Goldstein as well as his South Carolina attorneys.

The best reading in my opinion is the Rule 26f filings required by the Court of which to date Ben Thompson has not answered. Ford Shelley lists only 3 witnesses, himself, his wife Gina Shelley and Howard K. Stern. However, in Shelley’s rule 26-3-a local rule filings, he lists only himself and his wife Gina Shelly as witnesses or persons that have information relevant to these allegations.

What caught my eye was the list of people who have possessions of some of the items alleged to have been taken out of Horizons the day after Anna Nicole Smith’s death.

1. Defendant Shelley has possession of a copy of a clown video.
2. All documents and tangible items related to litigation in the Bahamas which are in possession of the Bahamian authorities.
3. All documents and tangible items in possession of the California Department of Justice as to any investigation relating to Ms. Smith.
4. All documents and tangible items in possession of co-defendant Ben Thompson and/or his agents.
5. All documents and tangible items in possession of Larry Birkhead and/or his agents.

Which leaves the question of who has the ORIGINAL copy of the infamous Clown Video?

Howard K. Stern’s filing is a tad more revealing about where Stern’s team is going. In his required Rule 26-f list of the following witnesses.

(1) Howard K. Stern
(2) Larry Birkhead
(3) Pol’ Atteau
(4) Rita Cosby
(5) Don Clark
(6) Wilma Vicedomine
(7) Stancil “Ford” Shelley
(8) G. Ben Thompson
(9) Tom Pirtle, on of Virgie Arthur’s Texas lawyer at the burial hearing
(10) Tracy Ferguson an attorney that is part of Callendar’s in the Bahamas that G. Ben Thompson is suing.
(11) Gaither Thompson
(12) Melanie Thompson
(13) Gina Shelley
(14) Representatives of Fox News
(15) Representatives of Biscayne Professional Associates (possibly the company that imaged Anna Nicole Smith’s computers and hard drives when the Estate recovered them)

Howard K. Stern lists several Counts that make the basis of the Estate’s case against Ford Shelly and Ben Thompson and a couple caught my attention.

Count Three: Statutory and common law commercial appropriation of right of publicity:

Under California law, the right of publicity survives the death of a celebrity. Thus, any person who uses a deceased person’s name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness, in any manner . . . without prior consent from the executor of the deceased person’s estate commercially misappropriates the deceased person’s right of publicity. Cal. Civ. Code § 3344.1.

There can be no dispute that Ms. Smith held a fully descendible right of publicity
in her Estate property. See Cal. Civ. Code § 3344.1. Further, Shelley has admitted to removing documents and materials from Horizons after Ms. Smith’s death. There is no question that these documents and materials are owned by the Estate. Further, there is no dispute that these items removed by Shelley contained Ms. Smith’s name, voice, signature, and photograph. Shelley used the property by, among other things, distributing it to third parties, including media entities. Shelley had no prior consent from the Executor to use the property he stole from Horizons.

Count Six: Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act:

Whoever knowingly causes transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a protected computer; intentionally accesses a protected computer without authorization, and as a result of such conduct, recklessly causes damage; or intentionally accesses a protected computer without authorization, and as a result of such conduct causes damage and Forensic analyses confirm that Shelley copied and deleted files contained on the password protected computers and external hard drives owned by the Estate, which Shelley unlawfully removed from Horizons. Shelley lacked authorization to access the computers and external hard drives. Shelley’s conduct caused damage and losses in excess of $5,000 in a one-year period. causes losses of at least $5,000 in a one-year period, violates federal statute. 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(5).

Forensic analyses confirm that Shelley copied and deleted files contained on the
password protected computers and external hard drives owned by the Estate, which Shelley unlawfully removed from Horizons. Shelley lacked authorization to access the computers and external hard drives. Shelley’s conduct caused damage and losses in excess of $5,000 in a one-year period.

Stern’s Local Rule 26-3-a, lists most of the same witnesses with the exception of Wilma Vicedomine which leads to ask when and why did she become involved with Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley?

Howard K. Stern’s lists the following evidence and documents in the same disclosure that he and/or the Estate (Dannielynn Birkhead as the sole heir) might use to prove the claims.

The following categories of documents in the Executor’s possession, custody, or control may be used to support his claims:

(1) All documents referred to in the Complaint.
(2) Documents relating to the investigation into Defendants’ unlawful conduct in the Bahamas.
(3) Media interviews of Defendants.
(4) Communications between Defendants and third parties regarding the factual circumstances that form the basis for the allegations in the Complaint.
(5) Deposition transcripts of third parties in other litigation regarding the factual circumstances that form the basis for the allegations in the Complaint.
(6) Forensic analyses of Ms. Smith’s computers.
(7) Communications from counsel for Defendants which support the factual basis for the allegations in the Complaint.

So folks why did Ben Thompson miss the date of November 3 and has not notified the court or ask for an extension due to one of his lawyers being ill? Who edited the Clown Video and who has the original now? Why is Tom Pirtle listed, but the rest of Virgie Arthur’s legal team in Florida are not? Then we have Don Clark on both disclosures but Wilma Vicedomine as the lone separate person missing in one of the filings.

Could the Clark/Vicedomine investigation lead us from California, to Florida, to New York to South Carolina in the alleged attempts to have Howard K. Stern arrested and tried for something, anything it appears if the filings are to be believed.

Remember you can pick up all of the documents related to the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith suing Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley, opened to ALL, not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

In other news on November 4, 2008 Court Order from Florida that Postpones the Requirement of John O’Quinn and the O’Quinn Law Firm financials until November 10, 2008 the deadline for the two sides to file a Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice.

©Rose Turner
November 5, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith's Will, Annn Nicole Smith's Estate, Ben Thompson, Biscayne Professional Associates, California Department of Justice, Clark/Vice investigation, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Ford Shelley, FOX News, G Ben Thompson, Gaither Thompson, Gina Shelley, Horizons, Horizons in the Bahamas, Horizons lawsuit, Howard K Stern, John "Jay" Patton, John Patton, L. Lin Wood, Laminack Partle & Martines LLP, Larry Birkhead, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Melanie Thompson, Nicole Jennings Wade, O'Quinn's Don Clark Ex-FBI, Pol' Atteu, Rita Cosby, Stancil "Ford" Shelley, Susan Brown, Tom Pirtle, Tracy Ferguson of Callendar's in the Bahamas, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicedomine

Howard K. Stern filed the following under Seal on October 27, as requested on October 24, in the Howard K. Stern vs. John O’Quinn and The O’Quinn Law Firm. Therefore, what does this tell us and why?

The following were documents filed yesterday as per the Court Order:

1. Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the Absence of Actual Malice and any attached exhibits or appendices.

2. Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Statement of Material Facts and Plaintiff’s Statement of Additional Material Facts and any attached exhibits;

3. The confidential deposition transcripts of Rita Cosby, Wilma Vicedomine, and Jack Harding taken in the Stern v. Cosby matter which is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York;

4. The confidential deposition transcript and VIDEO of Don Clark which was taken in the present matter and in Stern v. Cosby; and,

5. Documents produced pursuant to Confidentiality Orders entered in the present matter and Stern v. Cosby; and

6. Stern’s Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Certain Exhibits to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and attached exhibits.

We have discussed the depositions and confidential documents of Rita Cosby, the depositions “transcripts”, of Wilma Vicedomine and Jack Harding. However, why was Don Clark’s transcript of his deposition with the VIDEO filed? What is on that video that the Stern legal team wants the Court to look at? Why the VIDEO of Don Clark and not just read the transcript of his deposition?

In O’Quinn’s filing for Summary Judgment we got to see a lot of documents including the Affidavit of Don Clark slamming Howard K. Stern and still doing the “mantra” of Howard killed two people and he still thinks that, as well as he thinks the Will was faxed 4 days before Anna Nicole Smith’s death. Clark’s Affidavit also states that Ron Rale and Bonnie Stern had access to the Will thus knowing what it contained prior to Anna Nicole Smith’s death.

Although to go on as defense by the O’Quinn team is allowed to file things publicly in their filings but Stern had to filed under Seal as agreed. What did Stern say in his filings? We will never know unless both or either the Stern vs. Rita Cosby and Hachette Books and/or the Stern vs. O’Quinn suit goes to jury trial. Do you think either of these suits will go to trial so we have access to these filings under seal?

Do any of you have or can find the “show transcripts” that Clark is referring to in regards to Ron Rale and Bonnie Stern? It appears to me in all of the media transcripts filed it seems those are not filed with the Court.

I will have the debunking of the blond ambitious Rita Cosby’s chapter 13 of her book and then I will have some “predictions” of what I think will be happening in both of these cases as they head to trial.

Pick up the papers to these suits that are open to ALL, not just members of Rose Speaks.com. There was also a housekeeping Order issued by the Court yesterday in Florida, granting the Pro Hac Vice requests of John Patton and Amy Stewart. It appears that the same team of lawyers is going to be overlapping these two cases, who would have ever thought they might be connected.

©Rose Turner
October 28, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Amy Stewart, Anna Nicole Smith, Bonnie Stern, Daniel Smith Inquest, Daniel Smth, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Douglas Maynard, Elizabeth McNamara, Howard K Stern, Jack Harding, John "Jay" Patton, John O'Quinn, John Patton, Krista Barth, L. Lin Wood, Larry Birkhead, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, M. Krista Barth, O'Quinn's Don Clark Ex-FBI, Rita Cosby, Ron Rale, The John O'Quinn Law Firm, The O'Quinn Law Firm, Virgie Arthur, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicedomine

The Southern District Florida Federal Court Issued two Orders approving both Howard K. Stern’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to have an additional 10 pages in his Memorandum of Law due on October 27, as well as his Opposed Motion for 5 additional pages in his filing of “Material Facts” due also on October 27. In the New York Case we also have the filing of notice of move by Douglas Maynard on behalf of the Akin, Gump, Straus, Hauer and Feld Law Firm.

On October 23, the Florida Court also issued an Order, granting the Request to withdraw as counsel of William V. Custer, Nicole J. Wade, Eric P. Schroeder and Benjamin T. Erwin, from the Florida suit, noting that the plaintiff Stern had no objection. We will never know what these people contributed behind the scenes as preparations for trial as I cannot find any declarations or affidavits filed in this case or any of the other cases pending in multiple jurisdictions filed by any of the lawyers now withdrawing. I did notice that Nicole J. Wade is still listed in New York as well as a new lawyer from Powell Goldstein added to the New York case on behalf of Howard K. Stern. Stern now has the same number of lawyers on his Florida team as does John O’Quinn and the O’Quinn Law Firm as this Florida Case rounds the final couple of corners and is set for trial on December 29.

In other filings, Stern is asking to file his Response and Memorandum of Law on the Motion for Summary Judgment for failure to prove actual malice under Seal, and his Memorandum of Law on “Material Facts” that he alleges will prove the actual malice under Seal. Stern filed a
Memorandum of Law and a Declaration by John Patton in the first Motion, and a Memorandum of Law and a Declaration by Luke Lantta in the second Motion.

In these filings we get a glimpse of an odd combination, in my opinion, looking at the extensive witness list and knowing that in New York there has been a lot of depositions and Subpoenas Duces Tecum, issued and completed. Judge Chin’s ruling on October 20 was a huge win for Howard K. Stern as the ruling allowed the crossover of not only the defendant party, Rita Cosby’s materials but also that of all third party witnesses in the New York case that Stern wanted to use in the Florida case for his Response.

I am not surprised by Rita Cosby’s deposition and confidential documents that are to be filed in the Florida Suit as we got a look at that occurring from the letters and Orders that came from the New York Court. I am also not surprise that the Wilma Vicedomine’s deposition and documents including all screen monikers she posted under, all sites she posted on and allegedly is still posting on if the posters on Topix.net are to be believed. Vicedomine was to also turn over any chat channels she might have posted in and specifically any and all requests of fellow posters to blitz TMZ.com with posts and asking that fellow posters launch writing campaigns on behalf of Vicedomine and since she is an agent of the O’Quinn Law Firm, allegedly at the direction of someone in that firm. I remember getting posts sent to me by an “Oh Really” on TMZ.com that seemed to know what was about to happen and be knowledgeable of upcoming events as far back as May 2007. Oh how I would love to know if “Oh Really” was in fact Vicedomine. The reason I would love to know this is the writing campaigns to multiple agencies, from the Bahamas, to Florida officials, to California officials, to FOX network hosts of shows, to advertisers to federal agencies. If Stern can connect those to the O’Quinn Law Firm via Vicedomine’s posting and via forensic computer specialists he might be able to prove that the defamation of him was a very well orchestrated “hate campaign” to have him convicted of horrid crimes to further the agenda of either Cosby or O’Quinn. Wouldn’t it be stunning if Vicedomine were the key that would link California, Florida, and the federal government of the U. S. as well as the Bahamas and show the conspiracy to keep the defamation going via Cosby and online “volunteers”, right back to the lap of O’Quinn so to say? Sadly, I predict that we will never know if that can be proved because of the extensive Protective Orders in place in both suits.

Then we have learned that Vicedomine did not agree to be deposed for the Florida Suit, only the New York case however, Don Clark did agree and was deposed in both cases. However, the big surprise to me was why is the Jack Harding deposition so important? We know his story was ever changing. We even know that Harding changed his story in interviews; we know that because of all of the changes as y’all pulled transcripts and videos showing that in the end he had talked to Jackie Hatten, Don Clark and that allegedly O’Quinn had offered to pay his way to the Bahamas to testify at the Inquest of Daniel Smith. This is if Harding’s ever-changing story is to be believed.

Stay turned folks as we round the bend in both suits and head for trial. I am a tad miffed and disappointed that after months of labeling Stern as a murderer, blackmailer, abduction of a child for ransom, gay with tapes to prove it, a pimp, an illegal drug obtainer, etc. related to Anna Nicole Smith, Daniel Smith and Dannielynn Birkhead. Now we find out that all of the upcoming documents involving the very people that are alleged to have done this with “actual and provable malice”; want to; insisted on and have been granted Protective Orders to prevent both the media and us, the public from knowing the truth until the trials.

Pick up the latest documents in these cases in our Download Section, opened to ALL, not just members of Rose Speaks.com and then come back and share your thoughts and takes on why Jack Harding is so important in the Florida suit as well as in your opinions did Vicedomine come clean so to say during her deposition and production of documents.

©Rose Turner
October 23, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Daniely Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Douglas Maynard, Elizabeth McNamara, Howard K Stern, Jack Harding, Jackie Hatten, John "Jay" Patton, John O'Quinn, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, M. Krista Barth, Nicole J. Wade, O'Quinn's Don Clark Ex-FBI, Rita Cosby, The John O'Quinn Law Firm, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Topix.net, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicedomine

On October 21, 2008, a Court Order from the Federal Court for the Southern District of New York has ruled that Stern can use Rita Cosby’s deposition and confidential documents because her attorneys and Hachette had not objected at the September 26 hearing. However BECAUSE Rita Cosby and Hachette’s counsel had no objection as long as the discovery materials were filed under seal the Court has found that Stern can also use third party depositions and documents. The Court noted in its Order that because “Defense counsel had not clarified that defendants cannot waive any objections that non-parties who have produced confidential materials may have. Any confidential discovery materials utilized from the present matter as well as any excerpts or paraphrasing of that confidential discovery material, must be filed under seal in the related action to protect the producing non-parties’ interests”.

This means the New York Court has found that there can be a limited crossover of using the non-parties material in the Response to the Summary Judgment in Florida. Examples would be using Larry Birkhead, Pol’ and Patrik, Mark Speer, and say Don Clark and Wilma Vicedomine’s depositions and documents supplied during their deposition and discovery for the New York case. Makes me wonder why allegedly Wilma Vicedomine was out blogging about a “chat that occurred in Sun’s chat channel” especially from what has been sent to me she or others allegedly on her behalf stated the date was off by at least a month if not two months.

In other news the Florida Southern District Federal Court Granting the Unopposed Motion for extra pages in Howard K. Stern’s Response giving him 30 total pages, and granting John O’Quinn and the O’Quinn Law Firm a total of 20 pages in their Reply.

Will Stern’s legal team use the nannies, Mark Speer, Tom Bednarek, and/or Larry Birkhead’s depositions or excerpts of them? What do you think Howard K. Stern will use and from those confidential files? Will he use Wilma Vicedomine and/or Don Clark’s deposition? Did Vicedomine, [Vice], and Clark think they were safe because their depositions were ONLY for the New York case and so “they thought” they would not be used for the Florida Suit. How will this affect the filing coming up by Howard K. Stern due October 27 in Florida?

Down load the documents from our Howard K. Stern vs. John O’Quinn and the O’Quinn Law Firm and the Howard K. Stern vs. Rita Cosby and Hachette Books, which are OPENED to ALL not just members of Rose Speaks.com, and then let us know what you think.

On October 22, 2008, there is a Court Order from the Southern District Court in Florida, granting Stern’s request for 5 additional pages on Response of Material Facts for a total 15 pages.

©Rose Turner
October 21, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith's Bahamas nannies, Anna Nicole Smith's Will and Estate, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Hachette Books, Howard K Stern, John O'Quinn, Krista Barth, Larry Birkhead, Lin Wood, Mark Speer, O'Quinn's Don Clark Ex-FBI, Patrik Simpson, Pol' Atteu, Pol' Atteu and Patrik Simpson, Rita Cosby, The John O'Quinn Law Firm, The O'Quinn Law Firm, Tom Bednarek, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicedomine