On the night of December 15 into the early morning of the 16th for about seven to nine hours, on PACER were the filings of Elizabeth McNamara’s Declaration in support of her client, Rita Cosby’s Motion for Summary Judgment with exhibits A – HH.

After the seven to nine hours that the documents were on PACER for the whole world or those of us with PACER accounts to download, Ms. McNamara filed a letter with the Court dated December 16. She was both advising the Court that the exhibits had been filed in error and requesting that she be allowed to file her Declaration corrected. Her letter went on to state she had contacted the other counsels in this case and had also contacted the Clerk of Court to remove the documents because some of them should have been filed under Seal. The Court granted this request on December 17, and Ms. McNamara got a “do over” on December 19, however, she also filed corrected versions of ALL of Rita Cosby’s filings that were due and had been filed with the Court on time by the Court’s Ordered due date of December 15. We have not yet completed rechecking those documents compared with the Originals filed on December 15 to see if any of them had been changed or redacted. However, all of those filings from both December 15 and December 19, minus the infamous document number 73 remain on PACER for everyone to download.

Rose Speaks.com did in fact download that now infamous filing of docket number 73, the Declaration of Ms. McNamara with all of the exhibits attached. We have struggled since the morning of December 16 as to whether to put up these documents including the Exhibits marked “confidential” or “highly confidential” filed with Ms. McNamara’s Declaration. We have pondered whether any of the other parties and/or their legal counsel involved in suits in other jurisdictions, (I. E. Texas both federal and state; California probate, South Carolina etc.), some of which have the same parties in those cases had downloaded the documents. Since they, [the papers], were put up in error by Ms. McNamara then that brings up the question of was any of the three versions of the Agreed Confidential Orders the Federal Court in New York had issued previously, each time tightening up the previously filed Agreed Order to protect the privacy of the parties? I have to say on a side note that what Ms. McNamara filed in error, makes those fourteen pages of Rita Cosby’s deposition filed by Lin Wood back in November 2007 look like a minor mistake and one hopefully that NOONE ever refers to in the future. Like with these papers, Rose Speaks.com had on November 29 - 30 downloaded those papers at 11 A. M. making Lin Wood releasing them to Art Harris after 5 PM on November 30 a moot point.

However, I regress to other days and other papers filed in error and not under Seal as the Federal Court in New York had intended and displayed by the additional Orders issued by the Court. The infamous document 73 with exhibits contained four of the eight excerpts of depositions referred to in Ms. McNamara’s Declaration. These excerpts of depositions were clearly marked confidential. I cannot begin to imagine the horror and personal violation that each of the four people whose excerpts were filed in error must feel. Some of the excerpts referred to delicate financial information with exhibits attached including one of the person’s social security number. The other filings that were marked confidential or highly confidential were multiple documents filed in the California Court regarding Dannielynn’s paternity in the fall of 2006. Clearly, both the California Family Court as well as Larry Birkhead never intended for any of these documents to be filed for the world to read. The documents ALL showed “highly confidential” marked on each of four exhibits of documents, including affidavits involving that suit filed under Seal as is my understanding required in Family Courts in California where a minor child is a subject of the suit. Mr. Birkhead’s attorney Michael Trope placed “highly confidential” on those documents before releasing them per a Court Order.

Other documents filed in error included the copy of the Royal Bahamian Police Affidavit filed by Ford Shelley on November 17, 2006, after the fight about Horizons had become front and center both in the Bahamas Courts as well as the Court of public opinion. There is also a partial filing of Howard K. Stern’s Affidavit filed with the Royal Bahamian Police dated September 10, 2006.

Ms. McNamara, in her Declaration, has marked exhibit R as being filed under seal and showing it redacted on her declaration as to the contents of the exhibit, in actuality all ten exhibits marked as exhibit R were filed by Ms. McNamara, some filed on December 16 and the rest filed on December 19 with the “do-over”. Exhibit R refers to the Court Proceedings, in the Bahamas related to Daniel Smith’s death and inquest.

After almost a week of discussions between Ken and myself weighing the “right of the public to know” versus the “right of privacy of these individuals” we have made a decision as to what to put up from this infamous filing of document 73 and what not to put up. We will NOT put up any of the four excerpts of depositions with exhibits filed in error. We will NOT put up any of the documentation involving the filings under Seal in 2006 with the family courts in California marked “highly confidential” in the accidental filing by Ms. McNamara on December 15. We did upload those exhibits that referred only to the CDs filed with the Court that were marked either “confidential” or “highly confidential”. We are also making available to download exhibit X, which is a brief excerpt from the book “Big Beautiful Doll” by Eric Redding. Although that exhibit is marked confidential since anyone can buy the book we felt like nothing in the Stern vs. Cosby case would be compromised. Exhibits BB and CC are identical except for about 15 pages marked “confidential” or “highly confidential”. Since this appears to be hand written notes by either Rita Cosby or her ghost writer Bruce Littlefield, those pages have been redacted and removed from what is available for you to download.

We hope you understand what we have gone through this week as we struggled with what we felt was the appropriate documents to put up for all to read. We hope each of you understand those documents we elected not to put up was strictly based on the fact we firmly believe those person’s involved, especially Dannielynn, “rights to privacy” trumps you the public, “right to know”.

Lawyers make mistakes as this filing clearly demonstrates. Hopefully, throughout the rest of the lawsuits involving these same people and lawyers, Lin Wood included, instead of the “mantra” of, (fill in the blank with a lawyer’s or party’s name here), cannot be trusted will now change. Our hope is that based on this horrible accident that in the future, as exampled in the case where Wood released 14 pages of a deposition, that the “mantra” of not being able to trust a lawyer and/or party will now be replaced with a sincere apology. As well as to figure out how to avoid in the future damage done by this type of mass filing of confidential papers which were available to the world via PACER for seven to nine hours.

These documents are in our download section, opened to ALL, not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

There will be two more articles up today. One debunking either Hachette’s filing for Summary Judgment including declarations and exhibits or the debunking of Cosby’s filing for Summary Judgment including declarations and exhibits. The second article that will be put up today will be about Casey Anthony and what happens now in that sad saga since the remains of Caylee have now been found.

©Rose Turner
December 21, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Bruce Littlefield, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Douglas Maynard, Elizabeth McNamara, Eric Redding, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Hachette Books, Howard K Stern, Jack Harding, L. Lin Wood, Larry Birkhead, Lin Wood, Michael Trope, Patrik Simpson, Pol' Atteu, Pol' Atteu and Patrik Simpson, Stancil "Ford" Shelley, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicedomine

In the Howard K. Stern vs. Rita Cosby and Hachette Books, on December 11, 2008, there was a letter addressed to Judge Denny Chin from Elizabeth A. McNamara requesting the Court for permission to file Motion for Summary Judgment for Rita Cosby and Hachette Books under seal. The Court DENIED the request to file the papers under seal “except that the parties may file a set of papers publicly, with confidential exhibits omitted and references to any confidential matters redacted, with a second complete and unredacted set that will be filed under sealed”.

Looks like the New York Court is going to allow us to see publicly some of the information that Cosby and Hachette is attempting to show in the Motions for Summary Judgment due to the Court by December 15.

What do you think we will be allowed to see and gleam for the filings due on Monday? Debunking chapter 13 will be up this weekend, lot’s to discuss in this case as well as several others we are following.

Remember that ALL documents filed in this case are in our download section, opened to ALL not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

©Rose Turner
December 13, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Barth, Bryan Cave LLP, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Douglas Maynard, Elizabeth McNamara, Howard K Stern, Jack Harding, Jackie Hatten, Jay Patton, John Patton, Krista, L. Lin Wood, Larry Birkehead, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Nicole Jennings Wade, Powell Goldstein LLP, Rita Cosby, Tom Bednarek

This article will be enlarged tonight with more of my thoughts about these Motions coming up and what we will be allowed to see.

We now have the rules for the Motion for Summary Judgment to be filed by Rita Cosby and Hachette Books and the Reply of Howard K. Stern to those Motions. Wonder if this is why we have those seven pages released from the Florida suit on Don Clark.

On December 2, 2008, New York Southern District Federal Court sets page limits on Rita Cosby’s Motion for Summary to 50 from the normal 25 Judgment and then Howard K. Stern’s reply can be 75 pages; Hachette intends to use the 25-page limit per the Civil Rules of Procedures.

So now, our attention shifts in part to the New York as Florida is officially closed even on PACER as of today.

I think now is a time to debunk the rest of chapter 13 of the real blond ambitious, Rita Cosby.

You can find all of the documents in our download section, opened to all not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

©Rose Turner
December 2, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Douglas Manynard, Elizabeth McNamara, Howard K Stern, Jack Harding, John Patton, Krista Barth, L. Lin Wood, Larry Birkhead, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Mark Speer, Nicole Jennings Wade, O'Quinn's Don Clark Ex-FBI, Randy Scott Zelin, Rita Cosby, Tom Bednarek, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicecomine

I have been remised on writing about this case because of the number of google alerts a day that comes out. This case is saturating news media in print, internet news, the blogosphere and on the 24-hour infotainment “news” shows, which many of us saw in the Anna Nicole Smith saga.

In some ways, it feels like February 2007 all over again. Before you think I am not worried about where Caylee Anthony is and what happened to her, rest assure, I don’t watch the news about her because it makes me sick, and like all of you I feel so helpless and confused with the differing reports we all are getting.

I do feel something happened to her and her grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony or her mother, Casey Anthony knows what that was or could point the police in the right direction. Will they come forward with the truth, who knows!

However, the state has passed out thousands of pages of information because Florida is the “sunshine state” meaning they believe in the transparency of the courts, papers filed etc. unless it involves a minor. We all saw what that “sunshine” allowed to be shown and passed around for dissecting on the 24/7 infotainment channels called “news”, and how they devoured all things Anna Nicole Smith. Could that be happening with the Caylee Anthony case? In fairness the state of Florida has also released the multiple Motions Casey Anthony’s attorney, Jose Baez, has filed to gain access to some of the state’s evidence against Caylee’s mother.

With all that said; here are some of my thoughts of who is “cashing in” on this poor girl’s disappearance and what is “feeding the beast” of greed.

Since I find it almost impossible for me to write about this poor child, I decided to turn and look at the greed in this case. We have the former spokesman, Larry Garrison, for the Anthony family selling pictures to NBC for $6,500 for one interview and then allegedly pocketing the money. The emails from NBC to Cindy Anthony that appears to substantiate that, thus exit stage left Larry Garrison as the family spokesman, one wonders if it was just the alleged $6,500.00 or more than that Mr. Garrison had pocketed as a “licensing fee”. Why did he not see that it went into a fund to find out what really happened to Caylee; that is for him to answer.

We next have the bounty hunter bondsman, Leonard Padilla, all decked out in his California western gear for interviews. Mr. Padilla we have seen from putting up the $500k bond, parking outside the Anthony home seeking the truth, of course all in front of the beast that he knows how well to feed; those 24/7 infotainment channels which they all try to pass as news channels. He seemed available to every paper, local and national station that would interview him. Then we have Padilla changing his mind about Casey’s innocence and revoking that bond and back to jail for Casey Anthony with cameras tipped off and rolling at her home. Padilla was once again touting his theory of what has happened to Caylee but this time he no longer believed in Casey Anthony’s innocence, and again made the rounds of any media that would have him as to why he changed his mind and how he came to that. Worse of all Padilla has been accused of allegedly planting “evidence” in a river in Florida, to collect money to continue the search. Padilla made sure and called the media for the cameras before calling the police now that shows real caring for preserving any evidence that “might have been found”. However decked out in California western ensemble he once again appears to have made all of the show circuits, print media anyone that would interview him. It seems it matters not what snake oil Padilla is selling this day the beast called “infotainment” must be fed.

How many interviews do we have by the investigator working for the family Mr. Dominic Casey, I have not heard of many perhaps he is not as colorful of a P. I. as Padilla is riding that infotainment beast. For any of you who missed Padilla never fear he intends to be back in Florida again this week fresh with a benefactor for him to continue his “search”, “spin”, etc. Does anyone else have visions of Jack Harding and his many appearances and the ever-changing story or is it just me?

Then we have the greatest beast of all 24/7 news/infotainment, same ones as before just a new case and “fresh” new interviews. This beast needs to be fed often so we have Greta, “On the Record” and Geraldo “At Large” on Fox promising us to get the “real” truth and not to stop until it is found. We have Nancy Grace on HLN nightly, with all of the experts she can get that Fox has not booked first.

In the state of Florida thousands of documents released they include both the grand jury indictment and the witness list of people to be called as witnesses for the state and they too seem to be trying Casey Anthony in public long before her “televised trial” in January for Capital Murder.

How did we get here, very simple, this thirsty beast of news/infotainment is fed by the ratings which in turn translates to bringing in paid advertising. Keep in mind what O’Quinn said in his filings in Florida, if you believe what is said you be stupid cause no one believes those shows. That is probably about the truest statement I have seen in his filings and one all of us need to take to heart. Forget who gave us that advice but it shall forever stay with me in regards to what was done to Howard K. Stern and what might be done to anyone who the beast turns upon to feast.

If we were not obsessed with this beautiful angelic child, if the news/infotainment did not continue to weave, if there were no needs for the ratings to feed the beast… well that discussion is best saved for another day.

Now do I think Casey Anthony had something to do with her daughter’s disappearance and her family helped in the cover up, I am not sure, but what ever has happened to Caylee is heart wrenching. I hope we read and discuss every document and every interview by police that is released by the state of Florida in this case and find each of our own truths.

Rose Speaks.com will house all of the documents in this case as they are released, right up and through the televised trial in January. We have about 91 documents up now in what we hope we have broken down to bite size pieces and we are working fast to get the latest documents released to the public up for you to read and then discuss with us. Remember our documents are opened to ALL, not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

Stay tuned, I have another article that will be going up today about Howard K. Stern. Remember that little trip we all took in that other 24/7 “news/infotainment” we craved in what seems like such a long time ago by infotainment clock. We were willing to feed the beast at the cost of his reputation for life.

I am not saying these cases are even remotely similar, except for many people cashing in, sadly in way too many ways.

I also want to thank all of you for the ten days I just took off from the site including the blog they were much needed. However, I am back and will be trying to keep up with all of the cases you want to see covered here for what I hope will be intelligent discussion. If you have one, email me, if we can make it happen in coverage that will work that gray matter we have called brains and make us think, then let’s discuss that and see where we shall go together. We will always and until the last case cover all things Anna Nicole Smith, but please remember we are opened to all of your suggestions as to which celebrity or high profile cases/trials you want to see here.

©Rose Turner
December 1, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Casey Anthony, Casey Anthony indicted, Caylee Anthony, Cindy Anthony, George Anthony, Geraldo At Large, Geraldo Rivera, Geroge and Cindy Anthony, Greta -On The Record, Greta Van Sustern, Jack Harding, John O'Quinn, Jose Baez, Nancy Grace

Howard K. Stern filed the following under Seal on October 27, as requested on October 24, in the Howard K. Stern vs. John O’Quinn and The O’Quinn Law Firm. Therefore, what does this tell us and why?

The following were documents filed yesterday as per the Court Order:

1. Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the Absence of Actual Malice and any attached exhibits or appendices.

2. Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Statement of Material Facts and Plaintiff’s Statement of Additional Material Facts and any attached exhibits;

3. The confidential deposition transcripts of Rita Cosby, Wilma Vicedomine, and Jack Harding taken in the Stern v. Cosby matter which is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York;

4. The confidential deposition transcript and VIDEO of Don Clark which was taken in the present matter and in Stern v. Cosby; and,

5. Documents produced pursuant to Confidentiality Orders entered in the present matter and Stern v. Cosby; and

6. Stern’s Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Certain Exhibits to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and attached exhibits.

We have discussed the depositions and confidential documents of Rita Cosby, the depositions “transcripts”, of Wilma Vicedomine and Jack Harding. However, why was Don Clark’s transcript of his deposition with the VIDEO filed? What is on that video that the Stern legal team wants the Court to look at? Why the VIDEO of Don Clark and not just read the transcript of his deposition?

In O’Quinn’s filing for Summary Judgment we got to see a lot of documents including the Affidavit of Don Clark slamming Howard K. Stern and still doing the “mantra” of Howard killed two people and he still thinks that, as well as he thinks the Will was faxed 4 days before Anna Nicole Smith’s death. Clark’s Affidavit also states that Ron Rale and Bonnie Stern had access to the Will thus knowing what it contained prior to Anna Nicole Smith’s death.

Although to go on as defense by the O’Quinn team is allowed to file things publicly in their filings but Stern had to filed under Seal as agreed. What did Stern say in his filings? We will never know unless both or either the Stern vs. Rita Cosby and Hachette Books and/or the Stern vs. O’Quinn suit goes to jury trial. Do you think either of these suits will go to trial so we have access to these filings under seal?

Do any of you have or can find the “show transcripts” that Clark is referring to in regards to Ron Rale and Bonnie Stern? It appears to me in all of the media transcripts filed it seems those are not filed with the Court.

I will have the debunking of the blond ambitious Rita Cosby’s chapter 13 of her book and then I will have some “predictions” of what I think will be happening in both of these cases as they head to trial.

Pick up the papers to these suits that are open to ALL, not just members of Rose Speaks.com. There was also a housekeeping Order issued by the Court yesterday in Florida, granting the Pro Hac Vice requests of John Patton and Amy Stewart. It appears that the same team of lawyers is going to be overlapping these two cases, who would have ever thought they might be connected.

©Rose Turner
October 28, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Amy Stewart, Anna Nicole Smith, Bonnie Stern, Daniel Smith Inquest, Daniel Smth, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Douglas Maynard, Elizabeth McNamara, Howard K Stern, Jack Harding, John "Jay" Patton, John O'Quinn, John Patton, Krista Barth, L. Lin Wood, Larry Birkhead, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, M. Krista Barth, O'Quinn's Don Clark Ex-FBI, Rita Cosby, Ron Rale, The John O'Quinn Law Firm, The O'Quinn Law Firm, Virgie Arthur, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicedomine

The Southern District Florida Federal Court Issued two Orders approving both Howard K. Stern’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to have an additional 10 pages in his Memorandum of Law due on October 27, as well as his Opposed Motion for 5 additional pages in his filing of “Material Facts” due also on October 27. In the New York Case we also have the filing of notice of move by Douglas Maynard on behalf of the Akin, Gump, Straus, Hauer and Feld Law Firm.

On October 23, the Florida Court also issued an Order, granting the Request to withdraw as counsel of William V. Custer, Nicole J. Wade, Eric P. Schroeder and Benjamin T. Erwin, from the Florida suit, noting that the plaintiff Stern had no objection. We will never know what these people contributed behind the scenes as preparations for trial as I cannot find any declarations or affidavits filed in this case or any of the other cases pending in multiple jurisdictions filed by any of the lawyers now withdrawing. I did notice that Nicole J. Wade is still listed in New York as well as a new lawyer from Powell Goldstein added to the New York case on behalf of Howard K. Stern. Stern now has the same number of lawyers on his Florida team as does John O’Quinn and the O’Quinn Law Firm as this Florida Case rounds the final couple of corners and is set for trial on December 29.

In other filings, Stern is asking to file his Response and Memorandum of Law on the Motion for Summary Judgment for failure to prove actual malice under Seal, and his Memorandum of Law on “Material Facts” that he alleges will prove the actual malice under Seal. Stern filed a
Memorandum of Law and a Declaration by John Patton in the first Motion, and a Memorandum of Law and a Declaration by Luke Lantta in the second Motion.

In these filings we get a glimpse of an odd combination, in my opinion, looking at the extensive witness list and knowing that in New York there has been a lot of depositions and Subpoenas Duces Tecum, issued and completed. Judge Chin’s ruling on October 20 was a huge win for Howard K. Stern as the ruling allowed the crossover of not only the defendant party, Rita Cosby’s materials but also that of all third party witnesses in the New York case that Stern wanted to use in the Florida case for his Response.

I am not surprised by Rita Cosby’s deposition and confidential documents that are to be filed in the Florida Suit as we got a look at that occurring from the letters and Orders that came from the New York Court. I am also not surprise that the Wilma Vicedomine’s deposition and documents including all screen monikers she posted under, all sites she posted on and allegedly is still posting on if the posters on Topix.net are to be believed. Vicedomine was to also turn over any chat channels she might have posted in and specifically any and all requests of fellow posters to blitz TMZ.com with posts and asking that fellow posters launch writing campaigns on behalf of Vicedomine and since she is an agent of the O’Quinn Law Firm, allegedly at the direction of someone in that firm. I remember getting posts sent to me by an “Oh Really” on TMZ.com that seemed to know what was about to happen and be knowledgeable of upcoming events as far back as May 2007. Oh how I would love to know if “Oh Really” was in fact Vicedomine. The reason I would love to know this is the writing campaigns to multiple agencies, from the Bahamas, to Florida officials, to California officials, to FOX network hosts of shows, to advertisers to federal agencies. If Stern can connect those to the O’Quinn Law Firm via Vicedomine’s posting and via forensic computer specialists he might be able to prove that the defamation of him was a very well orchestrated “hate campaign” to have him convicted of horrid crimes to further the agenda of either Cosby or O’Quinn. Wouldn’t it be stunning if Vicedomine were the key that would link California, Florida, and the federal government of the U. S. as well as the Bahamas and show the conspiracy to keep the defamation going via Cosby and online “volunteers”, right back to the lap of O’Quinn so to say? Sadly, I predict that we will never know if that can be proved because of the extensive Protective Orders in place in both suits.

Then we have learned that Vicedomine did not agree to be deposed for the Florida Suit, only the New York case however, Don Clark did agree and was deposed in both cases. However, the big surprise to me was why is the Jack Harding deposition so important? We know his story was ever changing. We even know that Harding changed his story in interviews; we know that because of all of the changes as y’all pulled transcripts and videos showing that in the end he had talked to Jackie Hatten, Don Clark and that allegedly O’Quinn had offered to pay his way to the Bahamas to testify at the Inquest of Daniel Smith. This is if Harding’s ever-changing story is to be believed.

Stay turned folks as we round the bend in both suits and head for trial. I am a tad miffed and disappointed that after months of labeling Stern as a murderer, blackmailer, abduction of a child for ransom, gay with tapes to prove it, a pimp, an illegal drug obtainer, etc. related to Anna Nicole Smith, Daniel Smith and Dannielynn Birkhead. Now we find out that all of the upcoming documents involving the very people that are alleged to have done this with “actual and provable malice”; want to; insisted on and have been granted Protective Orders to prevent both the media and us, the public from knowing the truth until the trials.

Pick up the latest documents in these cases in our Download Section, opened to ALL, not just members of Rose Speaks.com and then come back and share your thoughts and takes on why Jack Harding is so important in the Florida suit as well as in your opinions did Vicedomine come clean so to say during her deposition and production of documents.

©Rose Turner
October 23, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Daniely Smith, Dannielynn, Dannielynn Birkhead, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Douglas Maynard, Elizabeth McNamara, Howard K Stern, Jack Harding, Jackie Hatten, John "Jay" Patton, John O'Quinn, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, M. Krista Barth, Nicole J. Wade, O'Quinn's Don Clark Ex-FBI, Rita Cosby, The John O'Quinn Law Firm, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Topix.net, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicedomine

The Southern District Court in Florida issued an Order on October 14, 2008 for a hearing on October 17, 2008 at 1:30 PM. The hearing is to address John O’Quinn and The O’Quinn law firm’s Motion for Protective Order in relation to releasing financial information to Lin Wood except they are willing to release those 30 days before trial. The Motion before the Court is also asking that Howard K. Stern have no access because of “trust issues”.

The Court also issued an Order on October 15 to reset the Calendar Call Date from December 24 at 10 AM to December 23 at AM, due to a Court holiday.

Following the Wilma Vicedomine deposition on October 13, an alleged friend released the following information on October 14, which was sent to me.

“Per Targets (on Topix.net)
Wilma’s deposition was a smashing success and Stern and Wood are not happy about it.

…The depo lasted 10 hours and Wilma was represented by her own private attorney. Wilma told the truth and, just as we have been predicting all along, her testimony sucked the life out of Stern’s case.

…Klein is representing Clark today. [October 14]

…And that, my friends, is all I can say about it because that’s all I know. The contents of the depo itself is under seal. If any of it gets leaked, someone is going to jail.”

I am gathering from the above statement that Howard K. Stern in spite of his intense dislike for Texas and Houston in particular that he did in fact, [not as I predicted], go to Houston Texas to look Wilma Vicedomine eye to eye. It appears from Targets statement that Howard K. Stern overcame his dislike of Texas to see what Wilma had to say about her actions over the last year plus in his life and that of Anna Nicole Smith, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn Birkhead, etc.

Glad I did not have any money down on my bet. REMEMBER folks, anyone being deposed can share anything they want about the deposition, just as Pol’ and Patrik did to us, some of what they said following their depositions was published and some of it was off the record. There is NOTHING wrong with Wilma Vicedomine sharing the above information “on the record” via an alleged friend, spokesperson, to post on the internet. It is the parties, Howard K. Stern, Rita Cosby and Hachette that cannot release any information on any of the discovery, depositions etc.

It would appear if Targets statement turns out to be true that Wilma Vicedomine felt very good and confidant about her deposition.

I wonder if we will hear something from a “spokesperson” on behalf of Don Clark. Will Don Clark allow someone to address his deposition on the record and permit that “statement” to be put on the internet on his behalf?

In other news in the New York Court Howard K. Stern has added an additional attorney to his legal team, Amy Stewart of POGO filed for Pro Hac Vice status on October 1 and the Court approved that request with an Order on October 8, 2008.

Remember you can pick up all documents for all cases we are following in our download section, opened to ALL, not just members for Rose Speaks.com.

©Rose Turner
October 15, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Debra Opri, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Hachette Books, Howard K Stern, Jack Harding, John O'Quinn, L. Lin Wood, Larry Birkhead, Lin Wood, Mark Speer, O'Quinn's Don Clark Ex-FBI, Rita Cosby, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Topix.net, Virgie Arthur, Wilma Vice, Wilma Vicedomine