Ford Shelley and G. Ben Thompson sued again

G. Ben Thompson missed the filing date the Court set of November 3 for his mandatory filing of the Rule 26 f of initial disclosures, also Howard K. Stern’s attorney pointed out that due to Thompson’s attorney being ill they had not been able to hold the required conference via phone.

The Court approved Susan Brown to represent Ben Thompson. Howard K. Stern has attorneys approved for Pro Hac Vice status, including Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Nicole Jennings Wade of Powell Goldstein as well as his South Carolina attorneys.

The best reading in my opinion is the Rule 26f filings required by the Court of which to date Ben Thompson has not answered. Ford Shelley lists only 3 witnesses, himself, his wife Gina Shelley and Howard K. Stern. However, in Shelley’s rule 26-3-a local rule filings, he lists only himself and his wife Gina Shelly as witnesses or persons that have information relevant to these allegations.

What caught my eye was the list of people who have possessions of some of the items alleged to have been taken out of Horizons the day after Anna Nicole Smith’s death.

1. Defendant Shelley has possession of a copy of a clown video.
2. All documents and tangible items related to litigation in the Bahamas which are in possession of the Bahamian authorities.
3. All documents and tangible items in possession of the California Department of Justice as to any investigation relating to Ms. Smith.
4. All documents and tangible items in possession of co-defendant Ben Thompson and/or his agents.
5. All documents and tangible items in possession of Larry Birkhead and/or his agents.

Which leaves the question of who has the ORIGINAL copy of the infamous Clown Video?

Howard K. Stern’s filing is a tad more revealing about where Stern’s team is going. In his required Rule 26-f list of the following witnesses.

(1) Howard K. Stern
(2) Larry Birkhead
(3) Pol’ Atteau
(4) Rita Cosby
(5) Don Clark
(6) Wilma Vicedomine
(7) Stancil “Ford” Shelley
(8) G. Ben Thompson
(9) Tom Pirtle, on of Virgie Arthur’s Texas lawyer at the burial hearing
(10) Tracy Ferguson an attorney that is part of Callendar’s in the Bahamas that G. Ben Thompson is suing.
(11) Gaither Thompson
(12) Melanie Thompson
(13) Gina Shelley
(14) Representatives of Fox News
(15) Representatives of Biscayne Professional Associates (possibly the company that imaged Anna Nicole Smith’s computers and hard drives when the Estate recovered them)

Howard K. Stern lists several Counts that make the basis of the Estate’s case against Ford Shelly and Ben Thompson and a couple caught my attention.

Count Three: Statutory and common law commercial appropriation of right of publicity:

Under California law, the right of publicity survives the death of a celebrity. Thus, any person who uses a deceased person’s name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness, in any manner . . . without prior consent from the executor of the deceased person’s estate commercially misappropriates the deceased person’s right of publicity. Cal. Civ. Code § 3344.1.

There can be no dispute that Ms. Smith held a fully descendible right of publicity
in her Estate property. See Cal. Civ. Code § 3344.1. Further, Shelley has admitted to removing documents and materials from Horizons after Ms. Smith’s death. There is no question that these documents and materials are owned by the Estate. Further, there is no dispute that these items removed by Shelley contained Ms. Smith’s name, voice, signature, and photograph. Shelley used the property by, among other things, distributing it to third parties, including media entities. Shelley had no prior consent from the Executor to use the property he stole from Horizons.

Count Six: Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act:

Whoever knowingly causes transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a protected computer; intentionally accesses a protected computer without authorization, and as a result of such conduct, recklessly causes damage; or intentionally accesses a protected computer without authorization, and as a result of such conduct causes damage and Forensic analyses confirm that Shelley copied and deleted files contained on the password protected computers and external hard drives owned by the Estate, which Shelley unlawfully removed from Horizons. Shelley lacked authorization to access the computers and external hard drives. Shelley’s conduct caused damage and losses in excess of $5,000 in a one-year period. causes losses of at least $5,000 in a one-year period, violates federal statute. 18 U.S.C. §1030(a)(5).

Forensic analyses confirm that Shelley copied and deleted files contained on the
password protected computers and external hard drives owned by the Estate, which Shelley unlawfully removed from Horizons. Shelley lacked authorization to access the computers and external hard drives. Shelley’s conduct caused damage and losses in excess of $5,000 in a one-year period.

Stern’s Local Rule 26-3-a, lists most of the same witnesses with the exception of Wilma Vicedomine which leads to ask when and why did she become involved with Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley?

Howard K. Stern’s lists the following evidence and documents in the same disclosure that he and/or the Estate (Dannielynn Birkhead as the sole heir) might use to prove the claims.

The following categories of documents in the Executor’s possession, custody, or control may be used to support his claims:

(1) All documents referred to in the Complaint.
(2) Documents relating to the investigation into Defendants’ unlawful conduct in the Bahamas.
(3) Media interviews of Defendants.
(4) Communications between Defendants and third parties regarding the factual circumstances that form the basis for the allegations in the Complaint.
(5) Deposition transcripts of third parties in other litigation regarding the factual circumstances that form the basis for the allegations in the Complaint.
(6) Forensic analyses of Ms. Smith’s computers.
(7) Communications from counsel for Defendants which support the factual basis for the allegations in the Complaint.

So folks why did Ben Thompson miss the date of November 3 and has not notified the court or ask for an extension due to one of his lawyers being ill? Who edited the Clown Video and who has the original now? Why is Tom Pirtle listed, but the rest of Virgie Arthur’s legal team in Florida are not? Then we have Don Clark on both disclosures but Wilma Vicedomine as the lone separate person missing in one of the filings.

Could the Clark/Vicedomine investigation lead us from California, to Florida, to New York to South Carolina in the alleged attempts to have Howard K. Stern arrested and tried for something, anything it appears if the filings are to be believed.

Remember you can pick up all of the documents related to the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith suing Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley, opened to ALL, not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

In other news on November 4, 2008 Court Order from Florida that Postpones the Requirement of John O’Quinn and the O’Quinn Law Firm financials until November 10, 2008 the deadline for the two sides to file a Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice.

©Rose Turner
November 5, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
25 Responses to “G. Ben Thompson Misses Filing Date, Don Clark and Wilma Vicedomine part 3?”
  1. heath says:

    So once again they are not going to follow through like they did in the Horizons thing in the Bahamas.
    Why have they been able to get away with this? The documents make me think they were trying a little bit of extortion.

    And I love the statement from Florida

    O’Quinns financials delayed until the 10th and the settlement or a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice I Like that “with Prejudic”e bit

  2. fifi says:

    Here’s a link to Biscayne Professional Associates “http://wefightfraud.com/”

    I’ve said this before but, if you went into anyone’s home and stole all their computers, documents, personal videotapes, letters and diaries etc it would be easy to pick through it all. Very easy to cobble together a few bits and pieces that you could use to portray that person as a monster.

    I just find it very interesting that Team Stupid, with all that information at their fingertips (far more than most police warrents would allow) , powerful media companies behind them and JOQ’s political influence, were never able to find anything to charge HKS with. I doubt it’s “legal squirming” that saved Howard K Stern from criminal charges. It’s the fact they were never able to find something, anything he had done that he could be charged with, despite the goldmine of info they stole.

    What really sticks in my craw, though, is the total invasion of privacy Anna and then Howard were subjected to. Now that truly was criminal in my opinion.

  3. fifi says:

    http://wefightfraud.com/ oops proper link here

  4. Beth says:

    Yes fifi! Legally criminal and morally criminal, I think!

    About Tom Pirtle…
    I believe that the SC good ‘ole boys wanted to give Virgie ‘ammunition’ to take down HKS ( in their feeble minds anyway > ;)
    Due to VA being ‘represented’; they had to give info to Pirtle for Va and her defense of trying to get Anna’s body, the baby, potential marshall funds, ect…

    Now that ammunition might be verbal, or even could be:
    possible CANCELLED CHECKS FROM THE HORIZONS HOUSE???
    (or) something like that…

    Hey, didn’t some of those cancelled checks of Annas turn up on that ‘we love and support virgie arthur site’? You know the site that supported Anna then turned around and all of a sudden ONLY had GOOD articles to write about VA’s defense team! What a Joke! Now to me… that SMELLS of TEXAS INTIMIDATION TACTICS! ) possibly learned from former FBI agents??? :D

    MAYBE LIN WOOD AND HOWARD K. STERN NEED TO FILE SOME CHARGES ON THOSE PEOPLE WHO POSTED THEM ON THE OTHER SITE…
    > RECEIPT OF STOLEN PROPERTY
    (even if it is a copy, it is personal information that was publicly disclosed without authorization from the owner)

    Bet this type of information would be very interesting to the defendants and their lawyers in any and all TX suits!
    Psssst! TMZ are ya listening?

  5. fifi says:

    Just a couple of interesting side notes…looks like Debra Opri kept herself well out of the break in. TMZ are also not on the list of recipients, while Fox news are (am I smelling an “exclusive” deal cut with Fox?)

  6. hmm says:

    Just doesn’t make sense Thompson nah Shelly have to be smarter than that.To think they don’t have to answer.Fifi you are right is was not only criminaly wrong but morally. To bad it would take to much time and money to go after all the posters that made threats and untrue statements against Howard.I still have some of the worst

  7. Febbie says:

    Sounds like it is a no show Thompson, but they are good at it. Howard shows all of the witness, that will prove the intent of what Ford and Ben intentions were. Same things again little ms Wilma and big bad Don, snooping around trying to nail Howard to the wall. Most people have skeltons in their closet, but Howard’s was empty. That had to upset them.

  8. Ann says:

    There seems to be a “flu” epidemic among certain attorneys. Exactly how many attorneys has Ben Thompson been through? Is Brown the third or fourth? I’m losing count.

  9. ray says:

    I bet Quinn told the attorney JUST SAY YOUR SICK, IT WORKS FOR ME…Wilma has been all over this US to try and get Howard. I’d like her frequent flyer miles. Shelly has the video? I remember someone saying Attorney General Brown had a copy of the video that is what was said on Geraldo from Shelly. I didn’t think Brown had the video because it would have shown in full that Anna was playing around. But Shelly went to Geraldo and showed cut tape. Time to send these people to jail for what they did. It comes right down to stealing property from Anna and trying to make a profit from it. Shelly got paid by Fox and other shows for the right to show the tape. He might not have gotten paid but he got money for them having the right to show it. I put these people in the same catagory as Hatten’s Virigie…Low life scum..

  10. raven says:

    This is going to be a very interesting court case. Sure wish it could be televised, since FS likes to be on TV so much. At least they didn’t use “the dental appointment” again for the no-show. How dumb are these people? I suppose the answer is obvious, or they never would have broken in to Anna’s home and taken her possessions.

  11. BEVERLY says:

    Here we go again.Susan Brown,who has applied for admission pro hac vice to appear in this ligation took suddenly sick,I quess Robert Klein sickness was highly contagious,I also found my answer as to action in the Bahamas.The matter is still under investigation,in the Bahamas,but cannot be concluded until probate of Smith estate is resealed in the Bahamas.The video that was on Art Harris site,will tear away any,idea ,Ford Shelly had permission to take anything out of Horizons.There is one name missing as to where Anna items are on Howards court docs,MY OPINION VIRGIE ARTHUR,you can make bet she has items for sale,from Horizons.Howard is to much of a gentlemen,and kind person,but you are dealing with snakes,who are Greedy and very underhanded,

  12. butterfly says:

    this is interesting as shelley bragged on geraldo that he wasnt paid for the interview…but he was paid for thje exclusive rights of the stolen property. All that with damages should go right back into the estate. Don and wilmas PI adventures took them everywhere and they got nada. I was thinking if wilma is focusing on texas suits as well as she did the rest then we have it made :) job well done HKS and L Wood These 2 will b easy to take down. Also LOVE that HKS is getting these depos in all the courts. Will b an interesting read 1 day…hopefully!

  13. JMA says:

    Thompson’s nonresponse to legal matters is no surprise to me.

    ray [9] Beverly [11] too funny guys :lol:

    Beth [4] yes I think some of those checks were posted on a certain site and was questioned at the time as to how they were obtained. So how does someone who is not related to the deceased obtain personal property that belongs to the Estate and post it on a public blog?

  14. Rose says:

    #13 JMA good question, could explain the newest sensational article about the company that POGO is merging with is in a 5 trillion dollar lawsuit! If one is able to count zeroes on their fingers by that “author’s” own admission it would be 5 billion not trillion. Then if you pull PACER and read, the boring suit (it has a lot of techy things considering IRS tax shelters) that “author” would have known it is 5 million plus costs etc… LOL… That would be much less than Howard K. Stern’s suit against Rita Cosby and Hachette, which is for $60 million plus costs. And she wondered why a bunch of us bailed from her site because of her recklessness in NOT checking her facts; but going for the sensationalism like the step-brother and cousin stories from April 2007 and of course the “hits”.

  15. JMA says:

    Yes Rose it does seem as though some cannot count the zeros properly. With that said, cannot say I blame everyone who has bailed out from that site, seems they continue to get so many things wrong over there.

  16. Daisy says:

    JMA, I remember when you were asking about those checks back when it happened. Does this mean they could be charged
    with receiving stolen property when all of this comes out?

  17. Daisy says:

    wow, I know why I bailed and if I would have known then what I know now, I would have bailed a whole lot sooner.

  18. JMA says:

    Daisy, yes I did ask about those checks around the time they were posted but never found out how they were obtained by whoever posted them. I am hoping whomever was the recipient of those stolen items can be charged with receiving stolen property and then posting it on a public blog.

  19. Roxanne says:

    Oh wow! What a screw up. I thought she was perfect and had all her facts down to the bone? LOL Sounds like someone is slipping in thier facade.

  20. JMA says:

    Daisy knowing what I know now I am glad I was never a part of it. Hell knowing what I know now, I wish I would had never subjected myself to the sites that I did. I am glad I joined here and will never have any regrets about making this my finial choice. Well, maybe just one regret, I should have made it my first choice.

  21. BEVERLY says:

    Can anyone tell me if Pol and Patrik every said how they got the pictures for there book?,was that not the reason Howard objected,to publishing the book,stolen pictures,and maybe more stolen items with there lunch meeting with Rita and her lawyer?I still am sure sneaky Virgie is holding on to some of the items that were stolen..

  22. JMA says:

    Beverly, I agree Virgie probably does have some of those items in her possession.

  23. heath says:

    Rose is the 5 trillion only 5 million….but 5 trillion sounds so much more sensational

    I know… don’t let facts get in the way of a good story

    can she be sued for this?

  24. butterfly says:

    i like that tracey ferguson is a witness. He had the best quote re: GBT and Horizons in a bahamian newspaper once. Sorry cant link.

  25. BEVERLY says:

    You know,I want to compare Cindy Anthony,to Virgie,Cindy is a grandmother,that no matter what her daughter has done,is standing by her daughter against the press and everyone,even though Casey might had did away with there granddaughter,Cindy is still not saying a bad word about her daughter,Virgie on the other hand could not say enough bad things about her daughter .Sowing again why Virgie earned her own reputation.

  26.  
Leave a Reply


Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith