<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rose speaks - Celebrity and High Profile Trials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com</link>
	<description>Celebrity and High Profile Lawsuits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:05:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67553</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67553</guid>
		<description>INTERESTING! Thanks Rose!
This new doc (HKS&#039;s Reply to the Response) today states:

“.. is incorrect about the Court of Appeals issuing a mandate after granting mandamus relief. 
Appellate courts issue mandates after judgments, not opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1”

Goes on to say... McC can certainly file for a rehearing... it has NOTHING to do w/ the fact the 
COA has ORDERED the trial court to take certain action.... The filing for the rehearing 
should not stall the trial Court’s compliance w/ the COA’s order... in closing &gt;
&gt; HKS asks the trial Court to vacate (throw out) the order for discovery... 
__________________________________________________________________

[36] * Sammy, you are correct! Her mom was the sole heir. 
Maybe it was a joint bank account w/ her daughter and him that he spent?
The whole thing is weird and his persona was strange I thought...
http://www.perthnow.com.au/entertainment/brittany-murphys-bank-accounts-emptied-out-by-husband/story-e6frg30c-1225898379661</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INTERESTING! Thanks Rose!<br />
This new doc (HKS&#8217;s Reply to the Response) today states:</p>
<p>“.. is incorrect about the Court of Appeals issuing a mandate after granting mandamus relief.<br />
Appellate courts issue mandates after judgments, not opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1”</p>
<p>Goes on to say&#8230; McC can certainly file for a rehearing&#8230; it has NOTHING to do w/ the fact the<br />
COA has ORDERED the trial court to take certain action&#8230;. The filing for the rehearing<br />
should not stall the trial Court’s compliance w/ the COA’s order&#8230; in closing &gt;<br />
&gt; HKS asks the trial Court to vacate (throw out) the order for discovery&#8230;<br />
__________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>[36] * Sammy, you are correct! Her mom was the sole heir.<br />
Maybe it was a joint bank account w/ her daughter and him that he spent?<br />
The whole thing is weird and his persona was strange I thought&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.perthnow.com.au/entertainment/brittany-murphys-bank-accounts-emptied-out-by-husband/story-e6frg30c-1225898379661">http://www.perthnow.com.au/entertainment/brittany-murphys-bank-accounts-emptied-out-by-husband/story-e6frg30c-1225898379661</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Sammy1</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67550</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67550</guid>
		<description>Beth #31 - Wasn&#039;t Brittany&#039;s Mother the sole beneficiary of her estate?  How was the husband able to withdraw funds without proper documentation allowing access?  Something is fishy.  
I have a will with my sister as executor.  In addition, a full list of bills and accounts has been prepared complete with logins and passwords.  She&#039;s aware of any medications and in the event of less than desireable life - pull the plug.  I have no desire to be a burden to anyone.  Just take care of Max.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth #31 &#8211; Wasn&#8217;t Brittany&#8217;s Mother the sole beneficiary of her estate?  How was the husband able to withdraw funds without proper documentation allowing access?  Something is fishy.<br />
I have a will with my sister as executor.  In addition, a full list of bills and accounts has been prepared complete with logins and passwords.  She&#8217;s aware of any medications and in the event of less than desireable life &#8211; pull the plug.  I have no desire to be a burden to anyone.  Just take care of Max.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by DiamondGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67548</link>
		<dc:creator>DiamondGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67548</guid>
		<description>Beverly, There are some people who don&#039;t give a damn about Anna Nicole Smith, her drug habit or anything else that involved Anna.

Dr E was told that the drugs that she had ordered &quot;to knock Anna out&quot; was a dangerous combination. She also supposely ordered drugs in a woman&#039;s name that never ever saw her as a doctor and if I remember correctly, she even picked those drugs up herself. Dr. E has major problems with any defense.

You stated that you brought someone in OJ for their use but you also state that you did not know that they had nip bottles of gin. Stern can&#039;t state that he was used in this. He opened up prescription bottles that had HIS name on it. He had to be aware of what the hell was going on. I don&#039;t believe he thought any harm would come to Anna, let alone death and he might have even believed that Dr E knew what she was talking about, but she didn&#039;t. IIRC, at the time it was stated that Stern also got the warning about the drug mixture, has any papers ever been given out on that? Most of us saw the notice E was given......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beverly, There are some people who don&#8217;t give a damn about Anna Nicole Smith, her drug habit or anything else that involved Anna.</p>
<p>Dr E was told that the drugs that she had ordered &#8220;to knock Anna out&#8221; was a dangerous combination. She also supposely ordered drugs in a woman&#8217;s name that never ever saw her as a doctor and if I remember correctly, she even picked those drugs up herself. Dr. E has major problems with any defense.</p>
<p>You stated that you brought someone in OJ for their use but you also state that you did not know that they had nip bottles of gin. Stern can&#8217;t state that he was used in this. He opened up prescription bottles that had HIS name on it. He had to be aware of what the hell was going on. I don&#8217;t believe he thought any harm would come to Anna, let alone death and he might have even believed that Dr E knew what she was talking about, but she didn&#8217;t. IIRC, at the time it was stated that Stern also got the warning about the drug mixture, has any papers ever been given out on that? Most of us saw the notice E was given&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by DiamondGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67547</link>
		<dc:creator>DiamondGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67547</guid>
		<description>31. I am a little leary of the mother coming out now and complaining about how Simon stole all of Brittany&#039;s money. I remember where they both appeared on Larry King after Brittany&#039;s death and frankly I thought there may have been something between them more that son in law. I think we have all learned a lesson, or should have about mothers who complain about how their daughter&#039;s money has been spent.


32. I don&#039;t remember LB ever saying that he picked up Anna&#039;s medicines/drugs. I think she relied on Stern to do that but I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>31. I am a little leary of the mother coming out now and complaining about how Simon stole all of Brittany&#8217;s money. I remember where they both appeared on Larry King after Brittany&#8217;s death and frankly I thought there may have been something between them more that son in law. I think we have all learned a lesson, or should have about mothers who complain about how their daughter&#8217;s money has been spent.</p>
<p>32. I don&#8217;t remember LB ever saying that he picked up Anna&#8217;s medicines/drugs. I think she relied on Stern to do that but I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67546</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67546</guid>
		<description>July 29, 2010 Howard K. Stern&#039;s Reply to Virgie Arthur&#039;s Response to Stern&#039;s Motion to Vacate the May 2009 Discovery Order.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/Texas/7-29-10-Stern-Reply-Support-Motion-Vacate.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July 29, 2010 Howard K. Stern&#8217;s Reply to Virgie Arthur&#8217;s Response to Stern&#8217;s Motion to Vacate the May 2009 Discovery Order.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/Texas/7-29-10-Stern-Reply-Support-Motion-Vacate.pdf">http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/Texas/7-29-10-Stern-Reply-Support-Motion-Vacate.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67545</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67545</guid>
		<description>I got to ask a question.All the time LB says he was with Anna and she never had him pick up her perscriptions???Usually the one you are closest to does that for ya.So in that case why no mention of LB picking them up for her or at least taking her to get them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got to ask a question.All the time LB says he was with Anna and she never had him pick up her perscriptions???Usually the one you are closest to does that for ya.So in that case why no mention of LB picking them up for her or at least taking her to get them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67542</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67542</guid>
		<description>O/T &gt; I feel bad for Brittany Murphy’s mom... If these articles are true:

http://www.showbizspy.com/article/209023/brittany-murphys-widower-stole-all-of-her-money.html

http://www.movieline.com/2009/12/factory-girl-director-on-murphy-husband-simon-monjack-a-con-man-and-a-bad-guy.php

Well, it is already past 7 am... I best get busy. Have a great day everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O/T &gt; I feel bad for Brittany Murphy’s mom&#8230; If these articles are true:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.showbizspy.com/article/209023/brittany-murphys-widower-stole-all-of-her-money.html">http://www.showbizspy.com/article/209023/brittany-murphys-widower-stole-all-of-her-money.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.movieline.com/2009/12/factory-girl-director-on-murphy-husband-simon-monjack-a-con-man-and-a-bad-guy.php">http://www.movieline.com/2009/12/factory-girl-director-on-murphy-husband-simon-monjack-a-con-man-and-a-bad-guy.php</a></p>
<p>Well, it is already past 7 am&#8230; I best get busy. Have a great day everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67541</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67541</guid>
		<description>[22] Rose, that would be a great idea about the downloads!
Maybe you could label an article the name of the case; who v. who and the State.
Then copy all downloads into the part of the article you normally write in,
you would have a page for each article...
And put them on the right side of the main page of blog, it would be a (link) page url, (1) for each case. 
Well, that is just one idea on how to make them accessible, only if it is as easy as just multi coping all the downloads 
for each case and sticking them in there. Thanks.

&gt; In answer to your question of what I was looking for in SC, it was the questions, or requests to answer 
so I could compare them the responses given.

&gt;&gt; Sorry, I did not get back to you and Sammy last night... My brother and his family is coming down from a few States away... 
I was helping my mom for a bit and took care of some other things. I cannot believe he will have been in the Navy for 20 years 
in a few months! He just got promoted to an E-9, one rank under from being an officer! We are so proud of him! 
I honestly do not know how anyone can go in a submarine at sea for any length of time... I would be scared to death!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[22] Rose, that would be a great idea about the downloads!<br />
Maybe you could label an article the name of the case; who v. who and the State.<br />
Then copy all downloads into the part of the article you normally write in,<br />
you would have a page for each article&#8230;<br />
And put them on the right side of the main page of blog, it would be a (link) page url, (1) for each case.<br />
Well, that is just one idea on how to make them accessible, only if it is as easy as just multi coping all the downloads<br />
for each case and sticking them in there. Thanks.</p>
<p>&gt; In answer to your question of what I was looking for in SC, it was the questions, or requests to answer<br />
so I could compare them the responses given.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; Sorry, I did not get back to you and Sammy last night&#8230; My brother and his family is coming down from a few States away&#8230;<br />
I was helping my mom for a bit and took care of some other things. I cannot believe he will have been in the Navy for 20 years<br />
in a few months! He just got promoted to an E-9, one rank under from being an officer! We are so proud of him!<br />
I honestly do not know how anyone can go in a submarine at sea for any length of time&#8230; I would be scared to death!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67540</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67540</guid>
		<description>* Sammy, [21]
That was so nice of you to take the time to mail me those! My goodness! You are more organized then me, 
I have lost so many downloads due to restoring the computer.
I received 1,2, &amp; 4 (not 3) for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* Sammy, [21]<br />
That was so nice of you to take the time to mail me those! My goodness! You are more organized then me,<br />
I have lost so many downloads due to restoring the computer.<br />
I received 1,2, &amp; 4 (not 3) for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67539</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67539</guid>
		<description>Sammy, [25] from your link:
________________________________________________
“Birkhead to Testify -- Anna Nicole Was a Drug Addict”

“Larry Birkhead is prepared to tell a jury that he knew his baby mama Anna Nicole Smith was addicted to drugs for years ... this according to court documents obtained by TMZ. 

It&#039;s all part of the State of California&#039;s case against Anna&#039;s doctors -- in which they&#039;re accused of illegally providing prescription medications to the late starlet. 

According to the docs, filed in L.A. County Superior Court, the prosecution says Birkhead has &quot;personal knowledge of Anna Nicole Smith&#039;s drug activities, gleaned from years of personal observation.&quot; 

The lawyers defending the doctors are trying to exclude Birkhead&#039;s testimony, saying he&#039;s not &quot;qualified&quot; to testify on whether Smith meets the legal definition of an addict.

But in the docs, the prosecution explains that when Birkhead says Anna was an &quot;addict&quot; he is &quot;saying that [he] personally observed her using controlled substances in an uncontrolled way over a long period of time.&quot;

The judge is expected to make a ruling on the issue shortly.” 
__________________________________________________________

Larry is not an specialist in determining facts of addiction, the Courts usually force the prosecution and the defense to prove an expert is qualified to give a unbiased opinion on certain subjects. (in a detailed resumè of experience) He is not a doctor nor has he specialized in any type of training to give a qualified opinion on ANS or anyone else.
I don’t know how the Judge will rule, he could instruct the jury this is just a layman’s observation and has no expert knowledge in ‘labeling’ an addict, or the judge could exclude Larry’s testimony due to having other people who could do the same thing. (Personal knowledge and observations) Other people stating personal knowledge would not be so hard later for his daughter to hear. It could go either way, depending on how the Judge puts his testimony in context to the Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sammy, [25] from your link:<br />
________________________________________________<br />
“Birkhead to Testify &#8212; Anna Nicole Was a Drug Addict”</p>
<p>“Larry Birkhead is prepared to tell a jury that he knew his baby mama Anna Nicole Smith was addicted to drugs for years &#8230; this according to court documents obtained by TMZ. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s all part of the State of California&#8217;s case against Anna&#8217;s doctors &#8212; in which they&#8217;re accused of illegally providing prescription medications to the late starlet. </p>
<p>According to the docs, filed in L.A. County Superior Court, the prosecution says Birkhead has &#8220;personal knowledge of Anna Nicole Smith&#8217;s drug activities, gleaned from years of personal observation.&#8221; </p>
<p>The lawyers defending the doctors are trying to exclude Birkhead&#8217;s testimony, saying he&#8217;s not &#8220;qualified&#8221; to testify on whether Smith meets the legal definition of an addict.</p>
<p>But in the docs, the prosecution explains that when Birkhead says Anna was an &#8220;addict&#8221; he is &#8220;saying that [he] personally observed her using controlled substances in an uncontrolled way over a long period of time.&#8221;</p>
<p>The judge is expected to make a ruling on the issue shortly.”<br />
__________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Larry is not an specialist in determining facts of addiction, the Courts usually force the prosecution and the defense to prove an expert is qualified to give a unbiased opinion on certain subjects. (in a detailed resumè of experience) He is not a doctor nor has he specialized in any type of training to give a qualified opinion on ANS or anyone else.<br />
I don’t know how the Judge will rule, he could instruct the jury this is just a layman’s observation and has no expert knowledge in ‘labeling’ an addict, or the judge could exclude Larry’s testimony due to having other people who could do the same thing. (Personal knowledge and observations) Other people stating personal knowledge would not be so hard later for his daughter to hear. It could go either way, depending on how the Judge puts his testimony in context to the Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by BEVERLY</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67538</link>
		<dc:creator>BEVERLY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67538</guid>
		<description>Anna Nicole,and anyone that says there not is a liar.There was 24/7 coverage of Anna Nicole for weeks on end when she passed.If Dr E can prove and justify her treatment and drugs used,there should be no problem.I think Howard believed everything Dr E told him,I remember once a pt,who told me she could only talk to me,and waited till on got on duty,I worked 3-11 shift for a short time,well,I would stop by her room,bring a glass of orange juice,she had Cancer,and was scared,well little did I know,she had nip bottles of Gin.You can be used,and Howard was used.if he goes with Iwas following Dr orders.a jury can understand that. :mornincoffee:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna Nicole,and anyone that says there not is a liar.There was 24/7 coverage of Anna Nicole for weeks on end when she passed.If Dr E can prove and justify her treatment and drugs used,there should be no problem.I think Howard believed everything Dr E told him,I remember once a pt,who told me she could only talk to me,and waited till on got on duty,I worked 3-11 shift for a short time,well,I would stop by her room,bring a glass of orange juice,she had Cancer,and was scared,well little did I know,she had nip bottles of Gin.You can be used,and Howard was used.if he goes with Iwas following Dr orders.a jury can understand that. <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/mornincoffee.gif' alt=':mornincoffee:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by BEVERLY</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67537</link>
		<dc:creator>BEVERLY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67537</guid>
		<description>Good Morning Everyone-------My prayer is Howard Attorney does not go with &quot;they did not think she was addicted&quot; and Larry can only tell the truth.I will be very upset with that defense,Starting from before 1994,Anna was well on her way with drug use,There is a M.D. before Dr E ,a jury has intelligents,and are very well aware of A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Everyone&#8212;&#8212;-My prayer is Howard Attorney does not go with &#8220;they did not think she was addicted&#8221; and Larry can only tell the truth.I will be very upset with that defense,Starting from before 1994,Anna was well on her way with drug use,There is a M.D. before Dr E ,a jury has intelligents,and are very well aware of A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Sammy1</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67536</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67536</guid>
		<description>New article at TMZ - Larry to testify at LA trial.

http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/28/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-sandeep-kapoor-drug-addict/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New article at TMZ &#8211; Larry to testify at LA trial.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/28/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-sandeep-kapoor-drug-addict/">http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/28/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-sandeep-kapoor-drug-addict/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by heath</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67534</link>
		<dc:creator>heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67534</guid>
		<description>#9 Rox I agree the depo sounds different when used in different context as Rose said all along.

I have to do a bit of reading here but checked out exhibit F with Roses words...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#9 Rox I agree the depo sounds different when used in different context as Rose said all along.</p>
<p>I have to do a bit of reading here but checked out exhibit F with Roses words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67533</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67533</guid>
		<description>Beth and all here is the first Amended Complaint by the Estate for of Anna Nicole Smith in S. C. if there is something else you need let me know...

http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/SC/7-1-10-Estate-First-Amended-Complaint.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth and all here is the first Amended Complaint by the Estate for of Anna Nicole Smith in S. C. if there is something else you need let me know&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/SC/7-1-10-Estate-First-Amended-Complaint.pdf">http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/SC/7-1-10-Estate-First-Amended-Complaint.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67532</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67532</guid>
		<description>What do you want me to re-post Beth, anything from S. C. or another case?  Yea I can re-post it I keep all of the documents and was just thinking today we need a seperate link here for just documents.

July 28, 2010 Virgie Arthur&#039;s response to Howard K. Stern Motion to Clarify the Rule 11 Agreement

http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/Texas/7-28-10-Arthur-Response-Stern-Motion-Clarify-Rule-11-Agreement.pdf

July 28, 2010 Virgie Arthur&#039;s Response to Howard K. Stern&#039;s Motion to Vacate Discovery Order of May 2009

http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/Texas/7-28-10-Arthur-Response-Stern-Motion-Vacating-Discovery-Order.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you want me to re-post Beth, anything from S. C. or another case?  Yea I can re-post it I keep all of the documents and was just thinking today we need a seperate link here for just documents.</p>
<p>July 28, 2010 Virgie Arthur&#8217;s response to Howard K. Stern Motion to Clarify the Rule 11 Agreement</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/Texas/7-28-10-Arthur-Response-Stern-Motion-Clarify-Rule-11-Agreement.pdf">http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/Texas/7-28-10-Arthur-Response-Stern-Motion-Clarify-Rule-11-Agreement.pdf</a></p>
<p>July 28, 2010 Virgie Arthur&#8217;s Response to Howard K. Stern&#8217;s Motion to Vacate Discovery Order of May 2009</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/Texas/7-28-10-Arthur-Response-Stern-Motion-Vacating-Discovery-Order.pdf">http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/Texas/7-28-10-Arthur-Response-Stern-Motion-Vacating-Discovery-Order.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Sammy1</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67530</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67530</guid>
		<description>Beth, please let me know you received the emails.  Received a notice that message may not have gone through.
Beth - just received another message that email didn&#039;t go through.  



The First Amended Complaint is 60 pages dated 10-28-09. Maybe Rose can repost it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth, please let me know you received the emails.  Received a notice that message may not have gone through.<br />
Beth &#8211; just received another message that email didn&#8217;t go through.  </p>
<p>The First Amended Complaint is 60 pages dated 10-28-09. Maybe Rose can repost it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67529</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67529</guid>
		<description>DG same goes for my family doctor.He know his patient and acts accordingly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DG same goes for my family doctor.He know his patient and acts accordingly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67528</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67528</guid>
		<description>Funny how reading different parts of a deposition gives one a completely differant view of what was actually said and done. McShame tried to pull a fast one and it did not work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how reading different parts of a deposition gives one a completely differant view of what was actually said and done. McShame tried to pull a fast one and it did not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67526</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67526</guid>
		<description>Sammy! OMG! :oops: You ARE CORRECT!
I swear I am losing my mind!
IT WAS the Closer!

Thanks in advance for the SC filings in the mail...
I did get a little lost.

LOL &gt; That seems to be happening more and more to me!  :whistling: 

Hugs to you and Max!  @};- 

That is it for me until this evening, have a great day everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sammy! OMG! <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' />  You ARE CORRECT!<br />
I swear I am losing my mind!<br />
IT WAS the Closer!</p>
<p>Thanks in advance for the SC filings in the mail&#8230;<br />
I did get a little lost.</p>
<p>LOL &gt; That seems to be happening more and more to me!  <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/whistling.gif' alt=':whistling:' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Hugs to you and Max!  <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/40.gif' alt='@};-' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>That is it for me until this evening, have a great day everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67525</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67525</guid>
		<description>Oh good grief! I totally misunderstood that first tmz article!

Rose, I had thought this was D. Ross’s sister’s allegations.
Mybad....

http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/28/michael-jackson-love-child-barbara-ross-lee-mocienne-petit-jackson/
(pictures in the new article)
“TMZ just spoke to Dr. Barbara Ross-Lee, who tells us she&#039;s pretty damn sure that Mocienne Petit Jackson &quot;is not my daughter&quot; -- adding MPJ is &quot;delusional&quot; and calls the situation nothing short of &quot;bizarre.&quot;

Dr. Ross-Lee also points out a major hole in MPJ&#039;s story -- saying it would have been impossible for her to have conceived a baby with Michael back in 1975 ... because she never even met the guy. 

Dr. Ross-Lee says there was a time when MPJ &quot;was really harassing me at my office&quot; -- and was forced to have her employer contact the police to get MPJ to stop. 

According to Dr. Ross-Lee, she responded to one of MPJ&#039;s emails a few years ago to tell her she was mistaken and to wish her well.

As we first reported, MPJ filed documents yesterday requesting a judge allow her to take a DNA test to prove she&#039;s MJ&#039;s daughter ... and therefore lay claim to part of his fortune and be granted custody of his kids.

Good luck with that ... “</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh good grief! I totally misunderstood that first tmz article!</p>
<p>Rose, I had thought this was D. Ross’s sister’s allegations.<br />
Mybad&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/28/michael-jackson-love-child-barbara-ross-lee-mocienne-petit-jackson/">http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/28/michael-jackson-love-child-barbara-ross-lee-mocienne-petit-jackson/</a><br />
(pictures in the new article)<br />
“TMZ just spoke to Dr. Barbara Ross-Lee, who tells us she&#8217;s pretty damn sure that Mocienne Petit Jackson &#8220;is not my daughter&#8221; &#8212; adding MPJ is &#8220;delusional&#8221; and calls the situation nothing short of &#8220;bizarre.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dr. Ross-Lee also points out a major hole in MPJ&#8217;s story &#8212; saying it would have been impossible for her to have conceived a baby with Michael back in 1975 &#8230; because she never even met the guy. </p>
<p>Dr. Ross-Lee says there was a time when MPJ &#8220;was really harassing me at my office&#8221; &#8212; and was forced to have her employer contact the police to get MPJ to stop. </p>
<p>According to Dr. Ross-Lee, she responded to one of MPJ&#8217;s emails a few years ago to tell her she was mistaken and to wish her well.</p>
<p>As we first reported, MPJ filed documents yesterday requesting a judge allow her to take a DNA test to prove she&#8217;s MJ&#8217;s daughter &#8230; and therefore lay claim to part of his fortune and be granted custody of his kids.</p>
<p>Good luck with that &#8230; “</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Sammy1</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67524</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67524</guid>
		<description>Beth - I will email you my file folder of all things related to the estate, Shelley, Thompson, Brown, etc.

Beth - I believe that storyline was The Closer rather than Lie to Me.  I know, you and I watch the same shows and after a point they run together.

Everyone have a good day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth &#8211; I will email you my file folder of all things related to the estate, Shelley, Thompson, Brown, etc.</p>
<p>Beth &#8211; I believe that storyline was The Closer rather than Lie to Me.  I know, you and I watch the same shows and after a point they run together.</p>
<p>Everyone have a good day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67523</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67523</guid>
		<description>http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/health/7114116.html

&quot;THE OTHER DRUG WAR&quot; &quot;Dangers of prescription drug abuse hit home in Harris County&quot;

&quot;By LISE OLSEN July 19, 2010, 12:55AM&quot;
&quot;Nearly 250 people were accidentally poisoned by prescriptions in Harris County last year, the newspaper analysis of medical examiners records shows. 
Their average age was 42. Most were white. Almost half were women.
Among the dead were suburban working parents, engineers, entrepreneurs, college students, retirees, military veterans, mothers and fathers, grandparents and an amateur race car driver.&quot;
________________________________
quote: (from the first comment)

&quot;Yet again the Chron prefers sensationalism to facts. It wasn&#039;t simply that prescription drugs caused these deaths. 
MIS-USE of prescription drugs caused the deaths.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/health/7114116.html">http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/health/7114116.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;THE OTHER DRUG WAR&#8221; &#8220;Dangers of prescription drug abuse hit home in Harris County&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;By LISE OLSEN July 19, 2010, 12:55AM&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Nearly 250 people were accidentally poisoned by prescriptions in Harris County last year, the newspaper analysis of medical examiners records shows.<br />
Their average age was 42. Most were white. Almost half were women.<br />
Among the dead were suburban working parents, engineers, entrepreneurs, college students, retirees, military veterans, mothers and fathers, grandparents and an amateur race car driver.&#8221;<br />
________________________________<br />
quote: (from the first comment)</p>
<p>&#8220;Yet again the Chron prefers sensationalism to facts. It wasn&#8217;t simply that prescription drugs caused these deaths.<br />
MIS-USE of prescription drugs caused the deaths.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67522</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67522</guid>
		<description>I cannot remember if we have the questions from SC... Does anyone know if one of the other downloads is the ROGS? (interrogatories/questions)

WoW! #38. The answer, (worded by the lawyer) 

“With regard to the allegations within paragraph 145, these Defendants admit only that Mr. Santiago copied the hard drive of a computer belonging to Mrs. Thompson and Mr. Thompson later gave Mr. Santiago his cell phone, both pursuant to Mr. Santiago’s request.”

First of all, EVEN IF &gt; Anna’s STOLEN hard-drive was copied to Mrs. Thompson’s computer and the DA copied the stolen information... FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE...
or, do you think that Mrs. Thompson actually said that Anna’s hard-drive was hers?
CRAZY!
No matter how you look at it, it is not LEGAL EM (evidentiary material) to be spoke about in a Court of Law!! Did the DA have subpoena’s? I hope that HKS’s team of lawyers have subpoenaed EVERYTHING from the DA’s office in CA to see JUST HOW COOPERATIVE Thompsons, Shellys, SB, McC, DC, his assistant were to them... Most likely it was TX influence PUSHING this stolen crap to the CA DA/DOJ in
their attempts to take HKS down from the position of Executor of Anna’s estate....

LOL! This lawyer is throwing out EVERY DEFENSE he can think of!
Sorry CHARLIE! The Judge already RULED there was enough evidence of WRONG-DOING...
Dismissed?? NEVER! IMO

(How about a plea bargain? Tell all of SB’s, and McC’s involvement in this diabolical plot to destroy ANS’s Estate &amp; HKS being executor)... Just my opinion, I’d rather see the lawyers get in trouble and SC get their $ back for Horizons...[LESS what $ they made off of the stolen items, less any $ for what was NOT RETURNED] Have SC ADMIT to how the CLOWN TAPE really was in context, have SC people explain in detail what was said to them by SB and that TX lawfirm in a Court of Law....

I hope the Aug. 6th hearing drops HKS completely! THEN, McC has NO CHANCE w/ AH, TMZ... and it will be done. It will be won by the Defendants on SJ&#039;s.
This BOGUS CASE needs to be dropped, it should have never got this far except for: A FRIENDLY JUDGE TO THE PLAINTIFF&quot;S NOT FOLLOWING THE LETTER OF THE LAW and forcing INNOCENT DEFENDANTS and bloggers a lot of time and $ for a greedy act of trying to get HKS out of thier way. imso</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot remember if we have the questions from SC&#8230; Does anyone know if one of the other downloads is the ROGS? (interrogatories/questions)</p>
<p>WoW! #38. The answer, (worded by the lawyer) </p>
<p>“With regard to the allegations within paragraph 145, these Defendants admit only that Mr. Santiago copied the hard drive of a computer belonging to Mrs. Thompson and Mr. Thompson later gave Mr. Santiago his cell phone, both pursuant to Mr. Santiago’s request.”</p>
<p>First of all, EVEN IF &gt; Anna’s STOLEN hard-drive was copied to Mrs. Thompson’s computer and the DA copied the stolen information&#8230; FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE&#8230;<br />
or, do you think that Mrs. Thompson actually said that Anna’s hard-drive was hers?<br />
CRAZY!<br />
No matter how you look at it, it is not LEGAL EM (evidentiary material) to be spoke about in a Court of Law!! Did the DA have subpoena’s? I hope that HKS’s team of lawyers have subpoenaed EVERYTHING from the DA’s office in CA to see JUST HOW COOPERATIVE Thompsons, Shellys, SB, McC, DC, his assistant were to them&#8230; Most likely it was TX influence PUSHING this stolen crap to the CA DA/DOJ in<br />
their attempts to take HKS down from the position of Executor of Anna’s estate&#8230;.</p>
<p>LOL! This lawyer is throwing out EVERY DEFENSE he can think of!<br />
Sorry CHARLIE! The Judge already RULED there was enough evidence of WRONG-DOING&#8230;<br />
Dismissed?? NEVER! IMO</p>
<p>(How about a plea bargain? Tell all of SB’s, and McC’s involvement in this diabolical plot to destroy ANS’s Estate &amp; HKS being executor)&#8230; Just my opinion, I’d rather see the lawyers get in trouble and SC get their $ back for Horizons&#8230;[LESS what $ they made off of the stolen items, less any $ for what was NOT RETURNED] Have SC ADMIT to how the CLOWN TAPE really was in context, have SC people explain in detail what was said to them by SB and that TX lawfirm in a Court of Law&#8230;.</p>
<p>I hope the Aug. 6th hearing drops HKS completely! THEN, McC has NO CHANCE w/ AH, TMZ&#8230; and it will be done. It will be won by the Defendants on SJ&#8217;s.<br />
This BOGUS CASE needs to be dropped, it should have never got this far except for: A FRIENDLY JUDGE TO THE PLAINTIFF&#8221;S NOT FOLLOWING THE LETTER OF THE LAW and forcing INNOCENT DEFENDANTS and bloggers a lot of time and $ for a greedy act of trying to get HKS out of thier way. imso</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67519</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67519</guid>
		<description>Rox I will when I can, right now there is more pending in the depo possible, yea like more days.... however I will release all of it except those highly confidential parts govern by the Agreed Protective Order... don&#039;t know when this will be because I expect this state case to come to a standstill after the August 6th hearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rox I will when I can, right now there is more pending in the depo possible, yea like more days&#8230;. however I will release all of it except those highly confidential parts govern by the Agreed Protective Order&#8230; don&#8217;t know when this will be because I expect this state case to come to a standstill after the August 6th hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67518</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67518</guid>
		<description>Rose, 
You are welcome dear! Yes, I agree this story is crazy, but sometimes... the craziest ones might have some truth.
Especially since she is related to D. Ross, it might be hard to find out very much since she has lived in another country.
I was surprised of the allegation of MJ&#039;s mom also. It would be a good one to debunk - for sure!

&gt; Oh good! A South Carolina filing! Thanks! Have a great day, Rose. Hope you and Ken have been well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose,<br />
You are welcome dear! Yes, I agree this story is crazy, but sometimes&#8230; the craziest ones might have some truth.<br />
Especially since she is related to D. Ross, it might be hard to find out very much since she has lived in another country.<br />
I was surprised of the allegation of MJ&#8217;s mom also. It would be a good one to debunk &#8211; for sure!</p>
<p>&gt; Oh good! A South Carolina filing! Thanks! Have a great day, Rose. Hope you and Ken have been well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67517</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67517</guid>
		<description>* trina,
Thanks! Now, that does make sense... I cannot believe I got so confused! So much going on lately, my mind is having trouble concentrating.

* JMA, I do agree about the crazies coming out after a celebrities death... BUT, this one shocked me due to the allegations of several murders and
the person being related to D. Ross. What a wild story! This one does need a DNA test done, I&#039;d love to see what she looks like.

* Roxanne, the context of Rose&#039;s depo HKS&#039;s lawyer used does show the Court what she has said all along I think too. &gt; No CONSPIRACY!
No &#039;intended&#039; DEFAMATION... (Truth is a Defense) I cannot remember, but wasn&#039;t it QV via McC&#039;s help (at that time &#039;undercover help&#039; as 
they  were panning this &#039;sting&#039; to get TX bloggers in the mix for jurisdiction...) anyway, wasn&#039;t it QV who brought up the &#039;legal liason&#039; crap? 
Kind of like setting Rose up for a fall? When all she was doing was research, like so many others... Hell! The VAS have researched 100 x&#039;s more 
than any of the HKS supporters, IMO.

* Beverly, good morning to you too!
From your post [5] 
”Arthur, therefore alleges that information about Arthur flowed in one direction, to Stern, but NOT from Stern, 
Stern could not possibly be subject to jurisdiction in Texas, if information is flowing to him and no direction to publish the 
ALLEGEDLY defamatory statement about Arthur is being sent out from him”
I thought that Motion was written well! Clear, concise and to the point.
Also, great point on McC&#039;s continued &#039;blunder&#039; to the Court in his stacks of Motions filed... He says one of the &#039;harms&#039; is she couldn&#039;t get custody/
visitation... She never tried in TX! 
On the new LIE to ME show, the storyline was the mother of a dying son, killed the drugged out ex-daughter-in-law because she KNEW that 
grandparents couldn&#039;t get custody in CA (or any other State) if the mother (living parent) was deemed fit. (Tested clean from drugs)
NEVER was there a chance for VA to have any court ordered visitation, control over ANS&#039;s estate, much less custody after LB was determined 
to be the bio-dad... Case in Point &gt;&gt; VA NEVER LOST ANYTHING she could never originally get in the first place.
If O&#039;Q wouldn&#039;t have jumped in this and made it a huge mess... playing his &#039;mafia style&#039; (pressure with endless legal motions and money) way of
badgering people to get what he wants... There would have been NO Cosby book without the lawfirm&#039;s help, (I really think LB would have saw DO for 
what she is and left on his own in a different scenerio), There would have been no &#039;spreading&#039; of ANS&#039;s property stolen from Horizons without the lawfirm&#039;s
help, ect... 
IMO It is VA and her greedy counsel that have made this tragedy of ANS &amp; DWS&#039;s death into a huge mess with their conspiracies and then
the gall to accuse others of conspiracies that are COOKED UP IN THEIR FREAKING HEADS! I really hate all of TX&#039;s actions and so hope they get EXPOSED 
for their UNETHICAL, illegal behavior! I hope SC case gets SB, and McC disbarred for what they have done! JMHO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* trina,<br />
Thanks! Now, that does make sense&#8230; I cannot believe I got so confused! So much going on lately, my mind is having trouble concentrating.</p>
<p>* JMA, I do agree about the crazies coming out after a celebrities death&#8230; BUT, this one shocked me due to the allegations of several murders and<br />
the person being related to D. Ross. What a wild story! This one does need a DNA test done, I&#8217;d love to see what she looks like.</p>
<p>* Roxanne, the context of Rose&#8217;s depo HKS&#8217;s lawyer used does show the Court what she has said all along I think too. &gt; No CONSPIRACY!<br />
No &#8216;intended&#8217; DEFAMATION&#8230; (Truth is a Defense) I cannot remember, but wasn&#8217;t it QV via McC&#8217;s help (at that time &#8216;undercover help&#8217; as<br />
they  were panning this &#8217;sting&#8217; to get TX bloggers in the mix for jurisdiction&#8230;) anyway, wasn&#8217;t it QV who brought up the &#8216;legal liason&#8217; crap?<br />
Kind of like setting Rose up for a fall? When all she was doing was research, like so many others&#8230; Hell! The VAS have researched 100 x&#8217;s more<br />
than any of the HKS supporters, IMO.</p>
<p>* Beverly, good morning to you too!<br />
From your post [5]<br />
”Arthur, therefore alleges that information about Arthur flowed in one direction, to Stern, but NOT from Stern,<br />
Stern could not possibly be subject to jurisdiction in Texas, if information is flowing to him and no direction to publish the<br />
ALLEGEDLY defamatory statement about Arthur is being sent out from him”<br />
I thought that Motion was written well! Clear, concise and to the point.<br />
Also, great point on McC&#8217;s continued &#8216;blunder&#8217; to the Court in his stacks of Motions filed&#8230; He says one of the &#8216;harms&#8217; is she couldn&#8217;t get custody/<br />
visitation&#8230; She never tried in TX!<br />
On the new LIE to ME show, the storyline was the mother of a dying son, killed the drugged out ex-daughter-in-law because she KNEW that<br />
grandparents couldn&#8217;t get custody in CA (or any other State) if the mother (living parent) was deemed fit. (Tested clean from drugs)<br />
NEVER was there a chance for VA to have any court ordered visitation, control over ANS&#8217;s estate, much less custody after LB was determined<br />
to be the bio-dad&#8230; Case in Point &gt;&gt; VA NEVER LOST ANYTHING she could never originally get in the first place.<br />
If O&#8217;Q wouldn&#8217;t have jumped in this and made it a huge mess&#8230; playing his &#8216;mafia style&#8217; (pressure with endless legal motions and money) way of<br />
badgering people to get what he wants&#8230; There would have been NO Cosby book without the lawfirm&#8217;s help, (I really think LB would have saw DO for<br />
what she is and left on his own in a different scenerio), There would have been no &#8217;spreading&#8217; of ANS&#8217;s property stolen from Horizons without the lawfirm&#8217;s<br />
help, ect&#8230;<br />
IMO It is VA and her greedy counsel that have made this tragedy of ANS &amp; DWS&#8217;s death into a huge mess with their conspiracies and then<br />
the gall to accuse others of conspiracies that are COOKED UP IN THEIR FREAKING HEADS! I really hate all of TX&#8217;s actions and so hope they get EXPOSED<br />
for their UNETHICAL, illegal behavior! I hope SC case gets SB, and McC disbarred for what they have done! JMHO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67516</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67516</guid>
		<description>Beth thanks for the TMZ link... WOW, pretty amazing what millions of dollars for grabs leads to, and who were the abductors and why did they end up dead??? Wish there was a way to get the papers she filed to read her allegations.  It is like another day another &quot;love child&quot; in that case...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth thanks for the TMZ link&#8230; WOW, pretty amazing what millions of dollars for grabs leads to, and who were the abductors and why did they end up dead??? Wish there was a way to get the papers she filed to read her allegations.  It is like another day another &#8220;love child&#8221; in that case&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67515</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67515</guid>
		<description>In the South Carolina Case Melanie and Gaither Thompson III filed their Answer to the Amended Complaint, that leaves Susan M. Brown and her law offices due by August 5, 2010

http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/SC/7-22-10-Gaither-Melanie-Thompson-Answer.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the South Carolina Case Melanie and Gaither Thompson III filed their Answer to the Amended Complaint, that leaves Susan M. Brown and her law offices due by August 5, 2010</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/SC/7-22-10-Gaither-Melanie-Thompson-Answer.pdf">http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/SC/7-22-10-Gaither-Melanie-Thompson-Answer.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Roxanne</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67513</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67513</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t know if this will post or not. connection is shitty at best here......

Isn&#039;t it interesting how the parts of Rose&#039;s depo filed by HKS shows a COMPLETELY different story than those filed by McCabe? Rose, can you release your entire depo for everyone to read? I remember it being said at one time that WV could release hers if she wanted to and she kept telling everyone she was going to do it but she never did. Just curious if we get to see the whole thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t know if this will post or not. connection is shitty at best here&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it interesting how the parts of Rose&#8217;s depo filed by HKS shows a COMPLETELY different story than those filed by McCabe? Rose, can you release your entire depo for everyone to read? I remember it being said at one time that WV could release hers if she wanted to and she kept telling everyone she was going to do it but she never did. Just curious if we get to see the whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by trina</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67512</link>
		<dc:creator>trina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67512</guid>
		<description>SO, HKS&quot; special appearance is an objection by Stern to TX jurisdiction. If the court agrees with Stern then his argument (or objections) will be sustained, or granted. Meaning HKS is out of the case. If HKS&#039; special appearance (for jurisdiction only) is denied, or overuled by the court then Stern is in. It does seem backwards, but that is the way I understand it. Stern wants his special appearance for objection to jurisdiction to be sustained (or granted) by the court. He had some good arguments, imo. 

Good day, everyone  :roserocks:  Thanks for the court papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO, HKS&#8221; special appearance is an objection by Stern to TX jurisdiction. If the court agrees with Stern then his argument (or objections) will be sustained, or granted. Meaning HKS is out of the case. If HKS&#8217; special appearance (for jurisdiction only) is denied, or overuled by the court then Stern is in. It does seem backwards, but that is the way I understand it. Stern wants his special appearance for objection to jurisdiction to be sustained (or granted) by the court. He had some good arguments, imo. </p>
<p>Good day, everyone  <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/rose-rocks.gif' alt=':roserocks:' class='wp-smiley' />   Thanks for the court papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by JMA</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67511</link>
		<dc:creator>JMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67511</guid>
		<description>Beth [4] this makes how many now claiming MJ is their daddy? I read the link below and back in April there was a guy claiming MJ was his father to but the lawyer for MJ’s Estate rejected the guys request for a DNA test to be done in order to prove it. Most likely this same lawyer will try to deny this one as well. I know this happens all the time when a celebrity dies…illegitimate children come out of the wood work. IMO if those making the claim are willing to pay for the DNA let them and be done with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth [4] this makes how many now claiming MJ is their daddy? I read the link below and back in April there was a guy claiming MJ was his father to but the lawyer for MJ’s Estate rejected the guys request for a DNA test to be done in order to prove it. Most likely this same lawyer will try to deny this one as well. I know this happens all the time when a celebrity dies…illegitimate children come out of the wood work. IMO if those making the claim are willing to pay for the DNA let them and be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by BEVERLY</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67509</link>
		<dc:creator>BEVERLY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67509</guid>
		<description>I have just read a perfect example of why the question  on the questionaire,What is the chief cause of crime,(T) answer drugs.This is why they are VAS,Vergie when asked by Judge Seidlin in Florida Vergie what she would have done different ,Vergie answer &#039;&#039;keep her off drugs&quot; Not I would have payed more attention to Anna ,I would have tried to understand and support my daughter,I   would have alwways been there for her MY OPINION AND ANSWER----Chief cause of crime,POVERTY,UNEMPLOYMENT,LACK OF RELIGION IN FAMILIES.LACK OF A FAMILY UNIT,LACK OF MOTHER FATHER LOVE.LACK OF CONSTRUCTIVE GUIDENCE,Drugs are the end result,and in this day and age,just plain copying the Video games and movies The VAS cannot think above Vergie butt,maybe if they came up for air,they would see the real world. :gaah!:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just read a perfect example of why the question  on the questionaire,What is the chief cause of crime,(T) answer drugs.This is why they are VAS,Vergie when asked by Judge Seidlin in Florida Vergie what she would have done different ,Vergie answer &#8221;keep her off drugs&#8221; Not I would have payed more attention to Anna ,I would have tried to understand and support my daughter,I   would have alwways been there for her MY OPINION AND ANSWER&#8212;-Chief cause of crime,POVERTY,UNEMPLOYMENT,LACK OF RELIGION IN FAMILIES.LACK OF A FAMILY UNIT,LACK OF MOTHER FATHER LOVE.LACK OF CONSTRUCTIVE GUIDENCE,Drugs are the end result,and in this day and age,just plain copying the Video games and movies The VAS cannot think above Vergie butt,maybe if they came up for air,they would see the real world. <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/gaah.gif' alt=':gaah!:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by BEVERLY</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67508</link>
		<dc:creator>BEVERLY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67508</guid>
		<description>Good Day everyone,This has been the best summer in years Well to my way of thinking this is it in a nutshell&quot;Arthur,therefore alleges that information about Arthur flowed in one direction,to Stern,but NOT from Stern,Stern could not possibly be subject to jurisdiction in Texas,if information is flowing to him and no direction to publish the ALLEGEDLY defamatory statement  about Arthur is being sent out from him&quot;This case has little or nothing to do with what Texas thinks of Vergie Arthur,it has everything to do with trying to take a child away from the childs father,(which will never happen)Maybe Anna&#039;s family can busy themselfs trying out for the new reality show looking for the new ANNA NICOLE. :mornincoffee:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Day everyone,This has been the best summer in years Well to my way of thinking this is it in a nutshell&#8221;Arthur,therefore alleges that information about Arthur flowed in one direction,to Stern,but NOT from Stern,Stern could not possibly be subject to jurisdiction in Texas,if information is flowing to him and no direction to publish the ALLEGEDLY defamatory statement  about Arthur is being sent out from him&#8221;This case has little or nothing to do with what Texas thinks of Vergie Arthur,it has everything to do with trying to take a child away from the childs father,(which will never happen)Maybe Anna&#8217;s family can busy themselfs trying out for the new reality show looking for the new ANNA NICOLE. <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/mornincoffee.gif' alt=':mornincoffee:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67506</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67506</guid>
		<description>Rose... Check out this story!
It is almost &#039;too crazy&#039; to not be &#039;possibly&#039; true.
Can you imagine if it is?
Now! That would be a real conspiracy! WTH is this about the alleged murders (?) Holy Cow!

http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/27/michael-jackson-love-child-diana-ross-legal-docs-barbara-mocienne-petit-jackson/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose&#8230; Check out this story!<br />
It is almost &#8216;too crazy&#8217; to not be &#8216;possibly&#8217; true.<br />
Can you imagine if it is?<br />
Now! That would be a real conspiracy! WTH is this about the alleged murders (?) Holy Cow!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/27/michael-jackson-love-child-diana-ross-legal-docs-barbara-mocienne-petit-jackson/">http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/27/michael-jackson-love-child-diana-ross-legal-docs-barbara-mocienne-petit-jackson/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keyes Woodland Hills, Buick, GMC, Cadillac Dealer hand John J. Nazarian his new Keys!!! by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/05/13/keyes-woodland-hills-buick-gmc-cadillac-dealer-hand-john-j-nazarian-his-new-keys/#comment-67504</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3086#comment-67504</guid>
		<description>An update............The GM contacted me and had the service manager call me, set up an appt and go over my car and fix or clean all the issues. Anyone can sell a car but keyes Woodland Hills did the right thing with a disappointed customer.
I am now a happy customer and would recommend them to others</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;The GM contacted me and had the service manager call me, set up an appt and go over my car and fix or clean all the issues. Anyone can sell a car but keyes Woodland Hills did the right thing with a disappointed customer.<br />
I am now a happy customer and would recommend them to others</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67503</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67503</guid>
		<description>Sorry... pg 21 not (2) on the Stern Supplemental Brief...
&quot;..that last paragraph (pg. 21, before the date) non-sensible?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230; pg 21 not (2) on the Stern Supplemental Brief&#8230;<br />
&#8220;..that last paragraph (pg. 21, before the date) non-sensible?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67502</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67502</guid>
		<description>Hey is it just me or is that last paragraph (pg. 2, before the date) non-sensible?
Maybe it is the heat or just a long day... but shouldn’t it be; ‘prays that his Special Appearance is denied?
(not granted) ‘..all claims against HIM dismissed for want of personal jurisdiction.’</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey is it just me or is that last paragraph (pg. 2, before the date) non-sensible?<br />
Maybe it is the heat or just a long day&#8230; but shouldn’t it be; ‘prays that his Special Appearance is denied?<br />
(not granted) ‘..all claims against HIM dismissed for want of personal jurisdiction.’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Latest filings in Case in Texas of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern et. al. by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/27/anna-nicole-smith-latest-filings-in-case-in-texas-of-virgie-arthur-vs-howard-k-stern-et-al/#comment-67501</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3282#comment-67501</guid>
		<description>Stern Supplemental Brief (Motion to Object)
pg. 10 (1) footnote:
“Based on Arthur’s theories, however, she does not seem to allege that the effects of the alleged defamation were even to be felt in Texas. Arthur claims that the alleged defamatory statements were an attempt to interfere with her gaining custody of Dannielynn. (See Ex. C, at 8.) While there have been various proceedings concerning Dannielynn’s interests in the Bahamas and [pg.11 - cont] California, there were - and never has been - any custody proceedings in Texas concerning Dannielynn and, therefore, Arthur cannot even contend that the statements were intended to do damage to her reputation in Texas.”

WoW! HKS will be COMPLETELY out of the FAKE CASE, BOGUS SUIT if he has been judged to NOT have jurisdiction.... 
But even if that happens... McC, O’Q, DC and his assistant have achieved their goal in getting charges filed in CA... 
assholes! imso!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stern Supplemental Brief (Motion to Object)<br />
pg. 10 (1) footnote:<br />
“Based on Arthur’s theories, however, she does not seem to allege that the effects of the alleged defamation were even to be felt in Texas. Arthur claims that the alleged defamatory statements were an attempt to interfere with her gaining custody of Dannielynn. (See Ex. C, at 8.) While there have been various proceedings concerning Dannielynn’s interests in the Bahamas and [pg.11 - cont] California, there were &#8211; and never has been &#8211; any custody proceedings in Texas concerning Dannielynn and, therefore, Arthur cannot even contend that the statements were intended to do damage to her reputation in Texas.”</p>
<p>WoW! HKS will be COMPLETELY out of the FAKE CASE, BOGUS SUIT if he has been judged to NOT have jurisdiction&#8230;.<br />
But even if that happens&#8230; McC, O’Q, DC and his assistant have achieved their goal in getting charges filed in CA&#8230;<br />
assholes! imso!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67500</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67500</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ken and Rose! [36]

Hello JMA! [32]
I agree... JB (his people) are going to have a tough time just prosecuting two doctors when so many do it with celebrities for the privacy issues.
Hey, did you hear that Brittany Murphy&#039;s house may have mold? The health department is going to check it out..
Wouldn&#039;t that be horrible if it was found to be that deadly mold? Which may have contributed to her and her husband&#039;s death?
Not to mention that it would also make the house worthless to sell. (Not that is as important as human life, but you know what I mean...)

Off to read the papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ken and Rose! [36]</p>
<p>Hello JMA! [32]<br />
I agree&#8230; JB (his people) are going to have a tough time just prosecuting two doctors when so many do it with celebrities for the privacy issues.<br />
Hey, did you hear that Brittany Murphy&#8217;s house may have mold? The health department is going to check it out..<br />
Wouldn&#8217;t that be horrible if it was found to be that deadly mold? Which may have contributed to her and her husband&#8217;s death?<br />
Not to mention that it would also make the house worthless to sell. (Not that is as important as human life, but you know what I mean&#8230;)</p>
<p>Off to read the papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67498</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67498</guid>
		<description>new article with papers up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new article with papers up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by DiamondGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67496</link>
		<dc:creator>DiamondGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67496</guid>
		<description>It really should be the doctor&#039;s decision on what drugs, for what symptoms. I use to be able to call my doctor for anything that I needed, at times he would have me come in and other times he would call in a prescription. There was never more than 10 pills in any given prescription but he always talked to me about it. I had called him when my mother died and asked for 10 valium (2mg), he prescribed it after talking to me. But he knew his patient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really should be the doctor&#8217;s decision on what drugs, for what symptoms. I use to be able to call my doctor for anything that I needed, at times he would have me come in and other times he would call in a prescription. There was never more than 10 pills in any given prescription but he always talked to me about it. I had called him when my mother died and asked for 10 valium (2mg), he prescribed it after talking to me. But he knew his patient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67494</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67494</guid>
		<description>I remember back when my oldest who is 42 was very small she always had ear infections and finially the doctor started just giving me prescriptions because of all the many times I took her in I was right about the infections,but that was for antibiotics.The same with my specialist when I had him,he gave be antibiotics with several refills because he knew I could tell when  I had pneumonia. Now my family doctor gives me refills for 1 year then I have to go in unless things get worse.He won&#039;t give me a prescription for antibiotics with out seeing him though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember back when my oldest who is 42 was very small she always had ear infections and finially the doctor started just giving me prescriptions because of all the many times I took her in I was right about the infections,but that was for antibiotics.The same with my specialist when I had him,he gave be antibiotics with several refills because he knew I could tell when  I had pneumonia. Now my family doctor gives me refills for 1 year then I have to go in unless things get worse.He won&#8217;t give me a prescription for antibiotics with out seeing him though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by DiamondGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67492</link>
		<dc:creator>DiamondGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67492</guid>
		<description>I would like an answer to a question, how does any other celebrity get their medication without people finding out if they suffer from some dreaded disease or have a simple cold?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like an answer to a question, how does any other celebrity get their medication without people finding out if they suffer from some dreaded disease or have a simple cold?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by JMA</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67491</link>
		<dc:creator>JMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67491</guid>
		<description>Beth [28] Lindsay&#039;s is amongst a long list of other Celebrity&#039;s being prescribed medications under aliases and for Jerry Brown to think he&#039;s gonna put a stop to it by bringing these charges against HKS and the two doctors is wishful thinking. Seriously does Brown think using these three to set an example will stop Celebrity&#039;s from obtaining prescription medications whenever they want them, I doubt it.

Just as John said in his post #6 &quot;This entire case is a non-story, here in Los Angeles, no reporting and it would appear that no one cares&quot; and I agree cause even after the charges were brought against HKS and the Doctors we heard of other Celebrity&#039;s either dying or being addicted to prescription medications. It&#039;s seems neither Celebrity&#039;s nor Doctors are paying attention to old Jerry Brown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth [28] Lindsay&#8217;s is amongst a long list of other Celebrity&#8217;s being prescribed medications under aliases and for Jerry Brown to think he&#8217;s gonna put a stop to it by bringing these charges against HKS and the two doctors is wishful thinking. Seriously does Brown think using these three to set an example will stop Celebrity&#8217;s from obtaining prescription medications whenever they want them, I doubt it.</p>
<p>Just as John said in his post #6 &#8220;This entire case is a non-story, here in Los Angeles, no reporting and it would appear that no one cares&#8221; and I agree cause even after the charges were brought against HKS and the Doctors we heard of other Celebrity&#8217;s either dying or being addicted to prescription medications. It&#8217;s seems neither Celebrity&#8217;s nor Doctors are paying attention to old Jerry Brown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by Stern is innocent</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67490</link>
		<dc:creator>Stern is innocent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67490</guid>
		<description>Mc Cabe and SC try to retard the lawsuit until the criminal lawsuit against Stern and doctors is over.
If Stern was winning SC and TX that make a better points for him in CA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mc Cabe and SC try to retard the lawsuit until the criminal lawsuit against Stern and doctors is over.<br />
If Stern was winning SC and TX that make a better points for him in CA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by BEVERLY</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67489</link>
		<dc:creator>BEVERLY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67489</guid>
		<description>BETH----That fool Michael Lohan is proving Howards point, that the practice of putting other names on med bottles is a common practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BETH&#8212;-That fool Michael Lohan is proving Howards point, that the practice of putting other names on med bottles is a common practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67488</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67488</guid>
		<description>Oh won&#039;t Brown just love that?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh won&#8217;t Brown just love that?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67487</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67487</guid>
		<description>Afternoon all!

Gosh! Summer time is keeping us all so busy...
Just wait until the CA trial starts.. I honestly wish there would have been cameras ordered in this trial, 
it will be hard to just read commentary from an article on the happenings each day.
____________________________________________________________________________________
* O/T &gt; Lohan (scripts in other names?) (How would her estranged dad even know this?) 
(Celebrity Confidentiality w/ doctors has been going on for decades)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/26/michael-lohan-lindsay-lohan-sheriff-police-report-doctors-prescription-drugs/3/#comments-anchor
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Michael Lohan Reports Lindsay&#039;s Docs to Sheriff
7/26/2010 10:40 AM PDT by TMZ Staff

&quot;Michael Lohan says he turned in a list of doctors he claims &quot;over-prescribed&quot; drugs to Lindsay Lohan ... 
and he wants the L.A. County Sheriff&#039;s Department to investigate the docs.  

Michael went to the West Hollywood Sheriff&#039;s station on Friday afternoon. He says he reported the doctors 
because he believes they wrongly prescribed drugs, and they did so &quot;under false names.&quot; 

Lohan also says his lawyer, Lisa Bloom, talked to California Attorney General Jerry Brown about including 
these doctors as part of his massive prescription drug investigation.&quot;
________________________________________________________________________________________________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Afternoon all!</p>
<p>Gosh! Summer time is keeping us all so busy&#8230;<br />
Just wait until the CA trial starts.. I honestly wish there would have been cameras ordered in this trial,<br />
it will be hard to just read commentary from an article on the happenings each day.<br />
____________________________________________________________________________________<br />
* O/T &gt; Lohan (scripts in other names?) (How would her estranged dad even know this?)<br />
(Celebrity Confidentiality w/ doctors has been going on for decades)<br />
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
<a href="http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/26/michael-lohan-lindsay-lohan-sheriff-police-report-doctors-prescription-drugs/3/#comments-anchor">http://www.tmz.com/2010/07/26/michael-lohan-lindsay-lohan-sheriff-police-report-doctors-prescription-drugs/3/#comments-anchor</a><br />
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
Michael Lohan Reports Lindsay&#8217;s Docs to Sheriff<br />
7/26/2010 10:40 AM PDT by TMZ Staff</p>
<p>&#8220;Michael Lohan says he turned in a list of doctors he claims &#8220;over-prescribed&#8221; drugs to Lindsay Lohan &#8230;<br />
and he wants the L.A. County Sheriff&#8217;s Department to investigate the docs.  </p>
<p>Michael went to the West Hollywood Sheriff&#8217;s station on Friday afternoon. He says he reported the doctors<br />
because he believes they wrongly prescribed drugs, and they did so &#8220;under false names.&#8221; </p>
<p>Lohan also says his lawyer, Lisa Bloom, talked to California Attorney General Jerry Brown about including<br />
these doctors as part of his massive prescription drug investigation.&#8221;<br />
________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anna Nicole Smith Trial, Summer Camp of Fun and Games in Judge Robert J. Perry&#8217;s Court by BEVERLY</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2010/07/23/anna-nicole-smith-trial-summer-camp-of-fun-and-games-in-judge-robert-j-perrys-court/#comment-67483</link>
		<dc:creator>BEVERLY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/?p=3276#comment-67483</guid>
		<description>~o) Good Morning----Ken I thought I was losing it.I am glad it was your cup of coffee,not my brain going to sleep,I will say my early morning look see at the other site,shows why the judge has to be careful with bloggers,One statement&quot;Daniel was upset how Dannielynn was being treated&quot;I said before (T) twist and turns the facts so to be unrecognizable.Daniel never left the hospital,so how was that statement even close to the truth.My self,(thinking out loud) I sure hope Don Clark gets what he truly deserves,and I think his depo will sink him,and show him the liar he truly is.along with WV,My feeling has been right along Howard made some deal with Rita Cosby,I do not think Cosby would forget all those people that threw her under the bus,and did not back up there stories,and made her look like a fool.and I would ask FS and GBT to take a polygraph,I find it very odd that FS was there the night before Daniel died,and was there was Anna went to this birthday party,and by the way so was Dr E,I find it sad to make so much of a clown tape,Howard was taping a party,when Anna shows up in her condition,why was it blamed on Howard? :mornincoffee:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/44.gif' alt='~o)' class='wp-smiley' />  Good Morning&#8212;-Ken I thought I was losing it.I am glad it was your cup of coffee,not my brain going to sleep,I will say my early morning look see at the other site,shows why the judge has to be careful with bloggers,One statement&#8221;Daniel was upset how Dannielynn was being treated&#8221;I said before (T) twist and turns the facts so to be unrecognizable.Daniel never left the hospital,so how was that statement even close to the truth.My self,(thinking out loud) I sure hope Don Clark gets what he truly deserves,and I think his depo will sink him,and show him the liar he truly is.along with WV,My feeling has been right along Howard made some deal with Rita Cosby,I do not think Cosby would forget all those people that threw her under the bus,and did not back up there stories,and made her look like a fool.and I would ask FS and GBT to take a polygraph,I find it very odd that FS was there the night before Daniel died,and was there was Anna went to this birthday party,and by the way so was Dr E,I find it sad to make so much of a clown tape,Howard was taping a party,when Anna shows up in her condition,why was it blamed on Howard? <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/mornincoffee.gif' alt=':mornincoffee:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
