Archive for the “ShowBiz Tonight” Category

Anna Nicole Smith

Seldom do I ever get a chance to just unwind and relax and think nothing except just the food I am eating. Well I got together with a ‘re-new’ old friend, does that make any sense? Let me explain, I met Daniel DiCriscio years ago, a very long time ago. He was employed at the Jose Eber Salon and had just launched his music career. Funny as it seems I remember that CD and it was not bad. I was developing my new business and offices and Daniel was busy with his hair and as I said his music. This guy has some real talent other than being ‘Daniel’. Go ahead and Google him, after you Google me.

Recently his mom died and we communicated both by phone and email and I could hear the pain in his voice as well as in his writings. His emotions were ones that had escaped me during similar circumstances that I had and I felt bad that he was at a loss in his mother’s death. We spoke further and again, it was good for me in away that is hard for me to explain.

Well through the last couple of years Daniel has assisted me in a few projects and he, like myself are tough to miss. He has a presence! The great blond hair and of course his style of dress, too bad those in power during the Anna Nicole Show missed him and found that ‘mess’ who played too many episodes. Booby Bobby or Bobby Boob, whatever. The two of us make an interesting ‘set’, black and white, sour and sweet, Beauty and , well enough, you get my point.

I suggested we get together for a bite to eat and the amazing thing here is that we are both very entertaining when it comes to the rich and famous. It was to the point I was wondering how have we missed what could be one of the best duos since Dean and Jerry, Amos and Andy, Jan and Dean, and maybe even Mutt and Jeff. My point here is that we could both have a new career, we had each other laughing and on serious points we were both on target. Especially, our thoughts on Anna Nicole Smith as well as others both in and out of Hollywood. My perspective is sarcastic and stinging; Daniel has what I call a ‘snap’, like get over it. Call me a little odd, but I was very entertained and realized it was just him and me.

I am posting this picture to make my point, when it comes to ‘Hollywood Insiders’ no one can come close to either one of us. And we both understand how far to the line we can come after all of these years bumping around Hollywood. Speaking for myself, there are things that I would never speak of and a book, is never going to happen. For Daniel the stories about Elizabeth Taylor alone could fill two chapters in his book. My time with Miss Taylor could fill maybe ten pages….thanks Adam! I recall my first encounter with Peerez Hilton and thought, “ Beast “, and having to do a short pilot with him, Lisa Stanley of KRTH ( she is the best ) and Ryan Seacrest’s assistant, what’s her name……the painful part was Peerez Hilton…and those feet!

All I am saying is watch, there could very well be some very interesting ‘tea’ coming along and presented in away that only two people in this town could present, John & Daniel or Daniel & John……that will be a hump to stroll over…..in time.

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks and see who Rose Speaks is following.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.

©John J. Nazarian
March 22, 2011
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 6 Comments »

Lin Wood, Southern Gentleman lawyer

Howard K. Stern’s Motion to Strike John O’Quinn’s Multiple Motions for Summary Judgment based on not done corrected under local rules and also filed late and noted this is an ongoing problem with O’Quinn’s legal team and filing.

We will be putting the other paperwork that John O’Quinn filed on the night of October 3 and 4, after the Court closed and kept it coming until after midnight. There are a lot of double filings of documents with the three Motions for Summary Judgment.

As I said earlier, I will be putting something up later today about my thoughts of what WAS NOT filed with the multiple Motions for Summary Judgment. Stay tuned, we hope you read, research and share with us what you find as we go through all of this.

It appears that the Florida Federal Court for the Southern District does care. The Court has issued today, October 6, an Order for John O’Quinn to Show Cause why Howard K. Stern’s Motion to Strike O’Quinn’s filings for Summary Judgment should not be granted, O’Quinn’s Reply is due no later than October 8.

©Rose Turner
October 6, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments 144 Comments »

 Ex-FBI Don Clark with Virgie Arthur

As I sat and listened to the interview last night that was sent to me from Don Clark’s, Tuesday April 8 Scared Monkeys Internet Radio, I found Mr. Clark’s words did hold some things I hope we can all agree about.

Dana Pretzer, the interviewer, mentioned that the focus had left Daniel Smith and Anna Nicole Smith and had focused instead on Howard K. Stern, and whether he did something wrong. I was amazed that Dana, said he felt like this was unfair and due to media coverage.

Don Clark also made some thought provoking statements. Don Clark mentions a “she” that was responsible for the drugs and the doses of medicine taken and that person was not there to testify. Don Clark never mentions whom the “she” was leaving us to ponder if that was a nurse, one of the nannies, who never met Daniel, or a doctor. He mentioned that the person had been on the list to testify so that leaves me wondering if perhaps it was a “he” as in Dr. Kapoor, however without a name we will never know who Don Clark was referring to. Mr. Clark did point the finger at Howard Stern, saying that he [Don Clark] is not going to pull any punches and pointing to Howard Stern and that his testimony changed from Florida to the Bahamas police statements to what he testified to at the Inquest and the jurors at the Inquest was not allowed to see the inconsistencies.

Dana Pretzer brings the interview back to the media coverage including Entertainment Tonight, all of the news shows, even including Dana’s internet radio show, TMZ.com. Dana goes on to say “All you see is these young star and starlets and they are in so much trouble because of substance abuse problems either prescription or otherwise”. Mr. Pretzer says that people are making money off of this story but Mr. Pretzer chooses not to say who he thinks is making money, preferring to keep that to himself and focusing instead on that “two people are dead and a young child without a mother”.

Dana Pretzer ends with a question that I think is beneficial to all of us; “What has today’s society done to contribute to this whole tragedy that we keep talking about here”?

Don Clark’s answers with; “…It is all about the money, and unfortunately that is what it seems to be. It is about whatever that a particular entity can get on film; or get on camera; and be able to display and show; and unfortunately for the viewing public is that they only get. …sound bites of what somebody else has decided that they need to see or hear and they judge and make their opinions based on that. … I have seen this in this case repeatedly, ah people make their decisions …on people, their personalities, their character, whether they are good or bad on a particular sound bite that they see or a particular photograph or video they see in one particular place. And that is unfair ah for the system…”

Don Clark goes on to say we have the best system in the world and it is important in sitting a jury that we weed out the people he just described.

Don Clark continued with; “…This case, in my life, I have never seen anything like this that moved to the scale it has and seems like certain outlooks or certain people have different views on different things and they only paint those and paint the other party in the absolute worse light and sometimes whether it is true or not”.

They go on to finish the interview about the thoughts of Don Clark on the cases involving both Daniel and Anna Nicole Smith and I recommend you all go to Scared Monkeys radio and listen to the full interview. Mr. Clark advocates that there is still an opportunity for further investigations as to what happened to Anna Nicole Smith and so I think each of you will come away with something from listening to the whole interview.

Dana Pretzer finishes with his own thoughts about “movies, books and litigation that will go on for years and years until the next star or starlet unfortunately will come to their demise in some sort of sad, depressing, questionable way.” Then Dana finishes with a question of “What can we in the media do Don, to be fair in something like this…?”

Don Clark says; “People want to surmise and come to their own conclusion as to what their thoughts are. And I think that they really want to be smart about these things”. Mr. Clark recommends to just “…Try to follow the facts instead of putting a (in audible) a different twist onto it on whatever direction you want it to go. Let the facts lead you to whatever the end may be. …get away from that and start putting your own analysis of it, and let’s face it many of our media people are well liked in the public and if it is said by some of our media people, it is gospel.” He goes on to say, “the media system needs to stick to the facts and circumstances and not be so selective as to what pieces of sound bites and that is what it is about and most (inaudible) a sound bite…”

Don Clark ends with a lesson for all of us, “Just be more responsible about what they [the media] say and what they say about people that someone might have casually said to them and they don’t even know this person…”

Dana Pretzer ends with, “In this situation that has happened to all of the different people”.

So now my editorial opinion here:

I agree with a lot of what this interview says. I wish none of these people involved had become a household name for me. Not following Anna Nicole Smith in life, I had never heard of most of these people until the trial for possession and burial of Anna Nicole Smith began in February 2007 in a Florida Probate Court. I can see where Anna Nicole Smith and Larry Birkhead might be household names because they both were what we refer to as “red carpet walkers having their pictures made at events”, thus they both became very public figures by choice.

I wish that Virgie Arthur, Howard K. Stern, Dannielynn, John O’Quinn, Lin Wood, Ron Rale, Krista Barth, G. Ben Thompson, Ford and Gina Shelley, Big Moe and Taz, the Stern family etc. had never become household words to me. I must admit that when I read on another blog about Lin Wood coming on board as one of Howard K. Stern’s lawyers I had no idea who he was, as I did not know whom John O’Quinn was. I had to, as I advocate, let google be my friend and do some internet research to see who even those two lawyers were.

I can also agree with Don Clark about the media and the need for more responsibility in the future and not to base all things on a sound bite, it is way too easy to do that and not think for our selves, but let the talking heads feed us those sensationalism sound bites.

That is the reason that Rose Speaks houses ALL the court papers on all trials we follow so that each of our readers can download the documents, do their on research and reach their own truth.

I don’t’ think at this stage of this sad saga that the two polarized viewpoints is ever going to change. It is going to remain divided between those who think Howard K. Stern killed two people and those who do not.

However, I have something else to offer to you all to think about in all of this that is not going to make many of you happy. I think that NO ONE in this whole saga walks on water or has the absolute truth. In fact, there are no winners in this to me, only lives being destroyed some due to this being thrust into each of our living rooms by infotainment masking as news from last February to the present; and some because they are only observers in this. If there is any one innocent person in all of this it is Dannielynn, and sadly, it appears with time and the internet her innocence might be lost at all too young of an age.

That being said I also believe this is about money and power, between Lin Wood and John O’Quinn and the rest of us are observing two titans at war as I have said before. One will come out as attorney of the decade the other will not. Thus, my fascination in loving legal papers will keep me covering all of these different trials to the conclusions of each.

©Rose Turner
April 10, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Comments 62 Comments »

Who are the other four adults in this picture

Do you know who these other four adults are in this picture? We do! Clown Video, drugs or Comedian extraordinaire?

In a stunning release by TMZ today of the script idea filed and registered with the Screen Writer’s Guild way back in 2004 and pranced out this past weekend for a hit show on E, does this put a new spin on Ford Shelley and the infamous “Clown Video”?

Once you learn who the other people in the clown video are, you just might be asking the same questions.

In the Writers Guild Association registration #9993389 “treatment/pitch” called “Celebrities Strike Back” obtained by TMZ today it would appear that E stole Anna Nicole Smith’s “registered” idea.

Why do people keep calling her a ditsy messed up blond? Why are people determine to steal money from Dannielynn by ripping off Anna Nicole Smith’s things and even ideas including the ones registered? What if Anna Nicole Smith was the ultimate Lucille Ball, as one of her close friends has always maintained?

“Before the episodes air, the media and the entire world will be convinced that Anna Nicole has absolutely lost it. Afterwards, everyone will think she is brilliant”. Now who said she was a uneducated, not very smart ditsy blond?

The “pitch/treatment” goes on to acknowledge, “As people catch on to Anna Nicole and the show, Anna Nicole will be forced to be less involved in the public aspects of the pranks”. “However, Anna Nicole will still be intimately involved in all other aspects with the guest celebrities to insure that the staged hoaxes go off without a hitch”.

The “registered treatment” goes on to say, “It’s time for the overzealous media to get its comeuppance”.

With a haunting line from the registration with the Screen Writers Guild about, “After Celebrities Strike Back, we will forever question whether the next big celebrity scandal is actually a scandal or an elaborate hoax”.

Well let’s line up everyone from Tony Pottshot of Access Hollywood, to Geraldo of Fox, and his “Geraldo At Large”, oh yea Geraldo get those apologies ready. However, my advice to all of these shows is to be sure that all of you have Ford Shelley caught in the head lights of an on coming Mac Truck and begin to say, “OMG, Anna Nicole Smith got us from the grave”. Howard K. Stern, “Say hello to your fans Anna”. “Hello fans” said Anna Nicole Smith with clown makeup on.

Thank God, Howard K. Stern and Larry Birkhead will fight to see that Dannielynn gets everything her mother wanted, and will know the very funny woman who was the first to make fun of herself. Bravo Anna Nicole Smith, EVERYONE from Houston, to California, to Rita Cosby in New York never bothered to know you.

Personally I have always associated Elton John’s song “Like a candle in the wind”, with you, however now I have to add, except you knew how to protect your ideas. Ok a new lawsuit to follow-up on and I hope it comes fast and furious from the Writers Guild protecting a member’s writings and ideas, to the Estate of Anna Nicole, to Howard K. Stern and Larry Birkhead to protect ALL future earnings for Dannielynn Birkhead. Isn’t the Writer’s Guild voracious when it comes to protecting their members?

An EDITORIAL OPINION STRAIGHT FROM MY HEART!!!

©Rose Turner
March 10, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Tags: , ,

Comments 117 Comments »

Weather forecast by WP Wunderground & Denver Snow Service

Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith