Archive for the “Rose Speaks Exclusive” Category

L Lin Wood sues National Enquirer for Natalee Holloway's mom Beth Holloway

“Based on the foregoing considerations, the motion to dismiss and for partial summary judgment filed by the defendants (doc. 16) is due to be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion to dismiss and for partial summary judgment is due to be DENIED as to the plaintiff’s claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. The motion to dismiss is due to be GRANTED as to plaintiff’s invasion-of-privacy claim, and that claim is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

So how did Lin Wood and Beth Holloway win? In this quote: “Based on the foregoing considerations, the motion to dismiss and for partial summary judgment filed by the defendants (doc. 16) is due to be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion to dismiss and for partial summary judgment is due to be DENIED as to the plaintiff’s claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.”

I am still reading through the court’s 33 page opinion but wanted to get this up for all of you that have been following the tragedy of Natalie Holloway and now her mother’s lawsuit against the National Enquirer.

I have also downloaded ALL of the Motions that led to the Court’s decision today, or those with exhibits not filed under seal. Ken and I will be working tonight to get ALL of the up for you to read.

One of our favorite attorneys and his law firm has struck another win on behalf of the small guy, or as Dan Rather put it the “voice for the damned”.

May 22, 2013 Alabama Federal Court\'s MEMORANDUM OPINION allowing Beth Holloway\'s lawsuit to continue against National Enquirer (6)

KEEP CHECKING BACK TONIGHT FOR ALL OF THE MOTIONS WE HAVE DOWNLOADED

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
May 22, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 1 Comment »

L Lin Wood and Melanie Osgood

Socialite and famed Libel Defamation attorney L. Lin Wood and Melanie Osgood announced their engagement over the weekend at the Ritz Carlton at Reynolds Plantation where Wood had proposed to his bride to be earlier.

We had scooped this before this weekend but had been asked to hold off on announcing this, something we are always willing to do when requested.

Looking at this picture it was well worth the wait and being big fans of Lin Wood in courtrooms and lawsuits, we here at Rose Speaks, especially Ken and Rose, wish Lin and the lovely Melanie only happiness. Many have said, including us, that Lin Wood radiates with happiness in this picture as does Ms. Osgood.

Melanie works full time as an underwriter for Chubb, after graduating from University of Georgia – Terry College of Business and studied abroad at Oxford University in England before moving to Atlanta. She is the daughter of Kendall and LuAnn Osgood of Snellville, Georgia.

…and the rest is the stuff of story book tales with a story book ending, the kind we all love to see happen to good people!

We intend to stay on top of this as wedding plans are announced!

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
April 1, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 7 Comments »

L Lin Wood

In the Sheldon G. Adelson vs National Jewish Democratic Council famed libel attorney L. Lin Wood went to the heart of the Washington D. C. Anti-SLAPP statute, you know the ones that Perez Hilton is always being sued and then comes back and wins under.

Lin Wood has gone straight to the heart of the constitutionality of the Anti-SLAPP statutes, could we be seeing the making of a U. S. Supreme Court case on the Horizon?

I read the other day on Face Book where an attorney had just filed his first defamation case and was wishing for a Lin Wood play book. I had forgotten how much I enjoy reading Wood’s filings. At one time I had said Wood’s Court filings were woven with the beauty of a glistering cobweb of a spider on a winter’s morning. As I read through these filings I found myself thinking the same thing. There are ought to be a Lin Wood play book for Libel and Defamation suits, he is still the best there is out there.

The hearing was on Dec. 17th in New York Southern District Federal Court before the Honorable J. Paul Oetken at 2:30 PM and the winner of the filings and Oral Arguments is……………

9 20 2012 MOTION Dismiss Pursuant D.C. Anti SLAPP Statute by National Jewish Democratic Council (159)

9 21 2012 Declaration David A Harris in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (132)
9 21 2012 Exhibit A Declaration David A Harris in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (126)
9 21 2012 Exhibit B Declaration David A Harris in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (115)
9 21 2012 Exhibit C Declaration David A Harris in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (124)
9 21 2012 Exhibit D Declaration David A Harris in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (114)
9 21 2012 Exhibit E Declaration David A Harris in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (106)
9 21 2012 Exhibit F Declaration David A Harris in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (109)

9- 21 2012 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (164)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 1-2 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (111)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 3-5 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (134)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 6-14 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (116)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 15 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (104)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 16-21 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (121)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 22-24 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (125)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 25 Part 1 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (120)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 25 Part 2 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (116)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 28 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (114)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 29-42 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (116)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 43-55 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (117)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 56-65 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (206)
9- 21 2012 Exhibit 66-72 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (159)
9 21 2012 Exhibit 73-78 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (133)
9 21 2012 Exhibit 79 Part 1 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (117)
9 21 2012 Exhibit 79 Part 2 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (118)
9 21 2012 Exhibit 80 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (113)
9 21 2012 Exhibit 81-88 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (113)
9 21 2012 Exhibit 89-97 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (128)
9 21 2012 Exhibit 98-106 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (123)
9 21 2012 Exhibit 107 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (120)
9 21 2012 Exhibit 108-110 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (118)
9 21 2012 Exhibit 111 Declaration of Rachel F Strom in Support of Motion to Dismiss Anti-SLAPP (131)

9 21 2012 Joint MEMORANDUM of LAW Support Dismiss by National Jewish Democratic Council (138)

9-28-12 ENDORSED LETTER Order by Judge J Paul Oetke Extend Deadlines set Hearing Date Oral Arguements 12-17-2012 at 2:30 PM all Mostions (115)

We will also be updating the Beth Holloway suit against the National Enquirer this week. These are some great cases to follow. HOWEVER IF YOU HAVE A CASE YOU WANT US TO FOLLOW, JUST FILL OUT THE CONTACT US FORM AT THE TOP. WE ARE ALSO ALWAYS LOOKING FOR GOOD GUEST AUTHORS SO IF YOU HAVE A CASE WHERE PAPERS ARE AVAILABLE AGAIN JUST FILL OUT THE FORM ABOVE, WE WILL GET THE PAPERS AND YOU CAN WRITE ARTICLES FOR ROSE SPEAKS.COM.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
February 13, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 1 Comment »

Sheldon Adelson

Now that the election is over I want to began a dialogue about one of the people I learned about named Sheldon Adelson. Imagine my surprise as I was using Google and PACER as my sources of information that I found that Sheldon Adelson who is an American business magnate, translated Billionaire. Adelson is the chairman and chief executive officer of the Las Vegas Sands Corporation, the parent company of Venetian Macao Limited which operates The Venetian Resort Hotel Casino and the Sands Expo and Convention Center. Adelson also owns the Israeli daily newspaper Israel HaYom. Adelson is listed in the Forbes 400 as the 12th wealthiest American. Adelson personal wealth is estimated to be $20.5 billion as of September 2012. WOW remands me of the case of billionaire magnate Kirk Kerkorian’s divorce and child custody case.

However on PACER I located a defamation suit where Sheldon Adelson is suing David A Harris, Marc R. Stanley and the National Jewish Democratic Council for maliciously false and defamatory statements that conveyed to the public that Adelson personally approved of profit from prostitution in integrated resorts owned and operated by Sands China Limited, a subsidiary of Las Vegas Sands Corp., of which Adelson is a major shareholder, Chairman and CEO.

However what grabbed my attention and caused me to download the papers was the lead attorney, Heavy Weight Defamation Specialist L. Lin Wood.

Rose Speaks.com will be following this case as well as the Beth Holloway case because many of our readers as well as the owners like the Motions and Memorandum of Law L. Lin Wood writes, and you can’t get better than when the rich with unlimited funds sues the rich, besides this case covers the ANTI-SLAPP statutes that gives people like Perez Hilton and TMZ some legal cover for the outrageous in states that have this statute. So get your popcorn out and let’s begin.

This case is based on the Citizens United Decision by the Supreme Court that allows Billionaires to give unlimited funds to a political candidate of their choice. In fact in the original filings Lin Wood alleges on his client’s behalf that the defendants’ goal in this lawsuit was to advance their perceived political interests by assassinating Mr. Adelson’s character, punishing him for exercising his right to make monetary contributions to political causes and candidates of his choice, and demeaning him within the Jewish community.

Wood argues on behalf of Adelson that Adelson supports open debate on issues of political concern, the defendants, in this case, made false and defamatory accusations, made with actual malice, and crossed the threshold from constitutionally-protected speech to defamation of a public figure designed to suppress speech for which they should be held accountable.

Although none of the parties lives in New York, Lin Wood states this court has jurisdiction because they all do business in New York and the court has “subject matter” jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332.

I don’t know if this is court shopping as we sometime see parties do, for instant East Texas federal courts “specialty” is Trademarks, so you would be surprise at who files lawsuit in our small area for that “specialty in courts” I will check New York and see if there is a “specialty” there as well in defamation or if this is simply the most convenient for everyone.

It appears the main claim by Adelson is that as a philanthropist he has donated significant funds to charitable causes in the U. S. and abroad, one of them is the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Clinic for Drug Abuse Treatment & Research in Tel Aviv, Israel, which was established more than 20 years ago with his wife, Dr. Miriam Adelson. They have clinics in Tel Aviv, Israel, Las Vegas, Nevada and in Macau.

Many of the hundreds of patients seen by these clinics (the Adelson Clinics), are women whose addiction has forced them into prostitution. The clinics work to support these women, provide them with drug abuse treatment and end their involvement in prostitution.

The Adelsons’ also fund a Medical Research Foundation that conducts, in part, some research into the biology of addictive diseases and the consequential impact on addiction treatment, among other fields.

In a July 3, 2012 article, defendanst David A. Harris and NJDC posted an article and an online petition asking others to support their demand that the Republican Party cease accepting monetary donation from Mr. Adelson. The Original complaint goes on to say the statements contained in the article are false and defamatory and convey the unmistakable message that Mr. Adelson engaged in the exploitation of prostitutes and is worthy of public scorn and contempt. This same author and JNDC posted another article with the same allegations and petition on July 11, 2012. The July 3, 2012 article titled “Tell Romney to Reject Adelson’s Dirty Money”

Adelson claims the only source of this information is a disgruntled former employee of Adelson, Steven C. Jacobs, who was terminated in 2010. The allegations are that Jacobs said he would try to get Adelson and has since then with false allegations in lawsuits as well as giving information to others like being the “only source” in two these articles, has continued to try and carry out his threats to ruin Adelson.

August 8, 2012 Original Complaint filed by Sheldon Adelson (171)
August 8, 2012 Exhibits A & B Original Complaint filed by Sheldon Adelson (0)
August 8, 2012 Exhibits C & D Original Complaint filed by Sheldon Adelson (0)
August 8, 2012 Exhibits D-E- & F Original Complaint filed by Sheldon Adelson (0)
2012-9-20 ENDORSED LETTER Extend Page Limits Sheldon Adelson National Jewish Democratic Council (169)

Part Two which will be the Motion for Summary Judgement based on the ANTI-SLAPP statutes and Adelson’s Response and Memorandum of Law will post soon after midnight tonight or by 7 AM tomorrow, November 19, 2012 after I have time to read and glean the best parts of L Lin Wood’s team’s filings.

We will also be updating the Beth Holloway suit against the National Enquirer on Tuesday, November, 20, 2012. These are some great cases to follow. HOWEVER IF YOU HAVE A CASE YOU WANT US TO FOLLOW, JUST FILL OUT THE CONTACT US FORM AT THE TOP. WE ARE ALSO ALWAYS LOOKING FOR GOOD GUEST AUTHORS SO IF YOU HAVE A CASE WHERE PAPERS ARE AVAILABLE AGAIN JUST FILL OUT THE FORM ABOVE, WE WILL GET THE PAPERS AND YOU CAN WRITE ARTICLES FOR ROSE SPEAKS.COM.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
November 18, 2012
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 1 Comment »

Ford Shelley and father-in-law G. Ben Thompson

The Sun News.com of Myrtle Beach, South Carolina led with the headline of “Developer linked to Playboy Model to Plead Guilty to Mail Fraud” by David Wren

The article goes on to say:

“Ford Shelley Jr. – the local developer whose acquaintance with the late Playboy model Anna Nicole Smith helped fuel a media circus following her death – has agreed to plead guilty to a felony charge of mail fraud related to allegedly falsified mortgages he helped to arrange for his Pineapple Bay condominium project in Myrtle Beach.

“Even though he has agreed to plead guilty, Shelley said he is the innocent victim of a mortgage broker who misled him about the legality of a loan program that Shelley used to sell the condos. Neither Shelley nor his lawyer identified the mortgage broker.”

Nice to know poor Ford is still hollering he is the victim. Wonder what the patriarch, G. Ben Thompson, thinks of Ford Shelley taking down some of the Thompson family with him, like Gaither B Thompson, II who is to be arraigned on November 9, 2011 at 10:30 AM in Florence, South Carolina for mail fraud with two of Shelley’s other business partners; after what we can gather was Shelley testifying against them to the grand jury, per Shelley’s plea deal.

All things considered Shelley’s attorneys, Gene Connell of Surfside Beach and Brown Johnson of Florence, cut Shelley a pretty sweet deal. Shelley:

“Did devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud a lender by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises.”

Shelley sold condo units at his Pineapple Bay Project, operated by his company, “Fruits of My Labor LLC” by inducing buyers to purchase the units and then Shelley would give them a large kick back in money after the sale of said property and leave that little tidbit out to HUD.

However the plea agreement is only for one count of mail fraud because of course Shelley’s hands were all over the completed loan packages minus that kick back money when mailed to GMAC Mortgage Corporation. Damn it is always the IRS or the U. S. Postal Office that gets you, Ford didn’t watching the Capone movies teach you anything?

Shelley sold the condos for $695k to $700k, all but one went into foreclosure. The condos are now selling for $135k to $155k.

Shelley entered into the plea deal on October 11, 2011. The day after Shelley plea deal was filed with the court on October 24, 2011, the federal grand jury indictment of Shelley’s brother-in-law Gaither Thompson II and two business partners for mail fraud of the same property was unsealed on October 25, 2011.

Shelley under his plea agreement was to testify to the grand jury truthfully about other parties involved. No date for his sentencing has been set, if he helps get the other guys, like in-laws, he might get some points by the court. Shelley is facing a maximum of up to 20 years in prison, a fine up to $250K, supervised release up to 3 years and a special assessment of $100.00.

So wonder if Ford and wife Gina Thompson Shelley will be invited to the holiday festivities this year?

Enjoy reading the papers.

October 24, 2011 Ford Shelley outline of Federal Criminal Charges (242)
October 24, 2011 Ford Shelley outline of Plea Agreement Federal Criminal Charges (222)
October 25, 2011 Federal Criminal Indictment of Gaither B Thompson II (430)

In what appears to be generosity the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith through the Executor Howard K. Stern filed with the federal court in South Carolina a Request for more time to enter the final agreement between the Estate and the Thompson/Shelley families until a hearing in the Probate Court in California to be held on January 24, 2012.

October 21, 2011 Anna Nicole Smith\'s Estate Requests More Time to Enter Settlement Agreement (184)

My final question after watching all of these clowns since February 2007, is CAN Ford Shelley be honest? What are your thoughts is facing federal prison time suddenly turned Ford into an honest man?

We encourage all of you to join other posters to discuss all of the cases we cover. Diamond Girl runs the community part of the site and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/ I seldom step on the forums that belongs to the members and is in great hands with Diamond Girl and she will be having a robust discussion there that all of you are invited to join

Visit our Download Section and pick up all of the documents related to the cases we cover.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
October 30, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 28 Comments »

Ronald J Hilton

The Hilton Hotels, this was a name based in a very special class of accommodating many travelers through the years actually since 1925. Real class based hotels, the best, hmmmm, maybe not so much in todays world, my thoughts. As you will see, one of the ‘Heirs’ also, hmm not so classy or as the expression goes, money does not ‘buy class’, read on!

The chain boasts that it has 3,750 hotels and 610,000 hotel rooms worldwide ( under several different brands some spectacular and some not so much ) The last comment could describe some of the ‘heirs’, some are spectacular and some are lets just say, ‘Unique’. One such ‘Unique’ HIlton is Uncle Ronnie, Paris Hilton’s uncle, this is another question to ponder, and why is Paris famous? I have some thoughts but I need to stay a little proper in this story.

Los Angeles Superior Court Case # BD 548 132 describes the divorce of Ronald J. Hilton, aka ‘Ronnie’ and his soon to be former wife Jo-Ann Hilton. Filing date is September 28, 2011, the happy couple were married September 9, 1999 and ‘separated’ July 15, 2011 ( this is also the date that we use on DESPERATEEXES.com as the date the ‘trash was tossed to the curb’. It was Jo-Ann that said this is it, I have had enough!…..and no children between the two. Ronnie’s only real claim to fame is that he is the youngest son of William Barron Hilton and the grandson of the founder of the Hilton Hotels, Conrad Hilton. And he is the Uncle of Paris, really? Wow and who cares? Having this lineage has been just wonderful in the form of having a rather large chunk of ‘MooLah’. Bring on the ‘strippers’, ‘ I am rich and will pay you to entertainment me, LOTS’ ‘I love being me, after all I am a HILTON’.

The records show how ‘Ronnie’ has a weakness for adult entertainment ( scantily clad young ladys ) and an occasional ‘good’ meal….LOL. One of the exhibits states that 0n 8.26.11 ‘Ronnie’ spent $762.78 at Mr. Chows in Beverly Hills…..this is a chinese restaurant that is beyond over priced and is as arrogant in attitude as they come, Mr. Chow my ass! I am sure that Mr. Hilton does not have to wait in line and why should he if he is dumb enough to spend over $700 dollars for chinese food…..’the rich are different’. Those that handle the front door of Mr. Chows can spot the suckers as they exit their cars, ( you ever visit Beverly Hills and want to see fools separated from their cash? Go get a coffee and sit across the street and you will see one of the best hustles in Chinese Food ) did I say suckers, I meant to say ‘rich and famous’……the rich get treated different at these joints.

‘Fools and their money’, it is stated in the declaration ( exhibit K ) of Jo-Ann Hilton that for two and one half weeks from July 6 to July 24, 2011 ‘Ronnie’ spent $19,328.63 for ‘Prisma Entertainment’ aka a STRIP CLUB aka “ Plan B”. Like the Sopranos, Badda Bing, ‘titties galore’ ‘ look at dat ass’, you can look and better not touch…unless you got some BIG Do Re Money and always the hope of ‘so much more’!

NOTE: (to all my female readers, seldom do Adult Entertainment use the correct name on credit card billing, it will not be, ‘ Big Boobs and Tight Buts ‘, rather it might be “ Savanah “, lots of important people go to these places and you dont want Boobs and Buts on your credit card statement.) No big deal right, we all have plan ‘B’s and as I said before, ‘the rich are different’, working guys like you and me have a ‘Plan B’ to feed and take care of a family not in this case folks. Here is a thought, was ‘Ronnie’ cumming or going for that price? Other accusations in the declaration speak of $1,660.60 at Louis Vuitton…a gift? I have been known to give special gifts also from “ Louis “, actually more $$$$ than this one, hmmm I guess if it was for a stripper that could get a very special lap dance! Keep ‘dem’ dollars coming I guess, open wide for ‘Ronnie’ The charges are interesting to in the dollar amounts, lots of $160.50, two were for $620.60 and $1,240.20 that has to be some real adult entertainment. This makes me feel cheap, I complain at the $100 for the two hour massage and happy ending as in I am often happy it has ended…ouch!

It would appear that ‘Ronnie’ likes the Chateau Marmont Hotel, ( the only thing this old dump needs is a wrecking ball ) 702.55 on 6.25.11 and again on July 6, 2011 $2,187.48 he must have been rolling like a ‘rock star’ on that night. Ronnie also likes the Four Seasons in Los Angeles, $2,055.55, here is a thought in ‘Ronnies’ roaming, is he checking out the competition? I did not see any Hilton Hotel property on his journeys around Los Angeles and quite frankly I dont blame him, The Chateau is old and seedy and The Four Seasons is very nice….could it be he knows something the rest of the traveling public does not know? Here is another thought, does he get to stay free at Gran Pa’s hotels? Could be. For me and a few ‘pals’ nothing nicer than the Ritz or the Four Seasons, I will always pass on a Hilton, unless I was a stripper or if I was an owner of a stripper paradise, then I guess I would love a HILTON, LMAO.

Mr. Ronald J. Hilton is being represented by the Law of Offices of Meyer, Olson, Lowy and Meyers. Mrs. Jo-Ann Hilton is being represented by Trope & Decarolis.

My final thought in all of this is simple, do the rest of the ‘ Heirs ‘ live like this and squander good money on strippers and good times in 2011, what must it have been like in the old days? The ‘founding father’ days of the Hilton Hotel chain, what the hell, the rich have always been different and sometimes not too smart…’, Hey, pay attention to me I am rich and I will pay and pay, I love paying, here take some money, see I like giving away, well most of the time anyway, How Much did you say?’.

Visit Desperate Exes.com to get the latest on All Things Hollywood.

We encourage all of you to join other posters to discuss all of the cases we cover. Diamond Girl runs the community part of the site and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/ I seldom step on the forums that belongs to the members and is in great hands with Diamond Girl and she will be having a robust discussion there that all of you are invited to join

Follow John J Nazarian On Face Book and on Twitter and see who John J Nazarian is following.

©Straight Talk with John J. Nazarian, Private Investigator
October 18, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 2 Comments »

John J Nazarian with new grandson Benjamin Michael

Good things always come in threes is what people say, well guess what they come in twos also. On October 9, 2011 at 11:03 AM my son Mike and his girlfriend Laura had a 6lb 10oz little boy, a bundle of joy, Benjamin Michael. This is my second grandson in less than two years, thus the “twos.” From the size of Laura I would have thought that she was going to have a baby in the 20 lb range.

To have the chance to enjoy another grand child is going to be fun, I get all the fun, when it gets too much it is a mere call for assistance and I can wait to enjoy another encounter at a later date. No diapers, no messes it is all pleasure, after all I am the grandfather who happens to be John J. Nazarian and why would I stress, “can’t we hire someone for that?”

Benjamin has one of the nicest nurseries I have ever seen, it is just wonderful and full of fun things and nothing was left out. Class! He is after all my grandson. Mike and Laura have done all the right things, bought a wonderful new home and have nothing but love and great times when they are together. They seem more like one and now after a great deal of ups and downs they have achieved their goal, a healthy baby boy, Benjamin. As for my other grandson, Benjamin will need a start someday and we need to take the responsibility seriously, that will be my job, Welcome to the world Benjamin.

Laura and Mike, all I can say, I can rest now,

Dad

From Ken and Rose and all here at RoseSpeaks.com congratulations to the Nazarian family

We encourage all of you to join other posters to discuss all of the cases we cover. Diamond Girl runs the community part of the site and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/ I seldom step on the forums that belongs to the members and is in great hands with Diamond Girl and she will be having a robust discussion there that all of you are invited to join

Follow John J Nazarian On Face Book and on Twitter and see who John J Nazarian is following.

©Straight Talk with John J. Nazarian, Private Investigator
October 15, 2011
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off

The forecast for 75647 by WP Wunderground

Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith