July 1, 2010 First Court of Appeals issued a new opinion, denied Arthur’s request for a rehearing, corrected the original opinion issued in April 2010. The court has granted Harris Motion for Mandamus for the three Orders to Compel. It appears to me on first glance that the Court has now extended In Re. Weekley Homes to cover appointing a Special Master in cases such as this. Which IMO is good and should continue to be expanded in Texas.

July 1, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s SurReply with exhibits attached to Howard K Stern’s’ Motion to Quash and for a Protective Order, the Reply says Stern had been served with the new lawsuit but has not reply… I think and would have to look it up that he has 21 days to reply and if the information that Arthur is depending on says he was served on June 18 then I think his answer is not due until July 9 (21 days later). It does have an interesting implication on the Cosby lawsuit settlement.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit A filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit B filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit C filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit D filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit E filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit F filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit G filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit H filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit I filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit J filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.

July 1, 2010 Art Harris Notice of SUBMISSION ONLY OF THIS MOTION FOR JULY 12, MOTIONS TO COMPEL ALWAYS HAVE TO BE SET FOR A HEARING. One has to wonder why Harris’ attorneys wanted all of this up for the public once again right before a long holiday weekend.

A brief few comments, lawyers can put anything they want to in a filing even if they know it is false at the time. They are covered by judicial immunity with filings and in a courtroom as just gamesmanship and being a fierce advocate for their client.

Ms. Hamilton is well aware of the truth and what she is saying here is out and out BS.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Some of the defendants need to say “Ms. Turner was honest 2 years ago and she is honest in this deposition”, and obviously it is in Art Harris’ best interest to say Ken and I have been paid off, that Ken is an “email drop” for communications between Virgie Arthur, her family lawyers etc. when the deposition clearly shows I have never had any communication with any of the main parties in this lawsuit except for Larry Birkhead. I remember at the beginning of these lawsuits the Plaintiff’s attorney accused Ken of being an “email drop” only for the evidence to show how false that was. However we are merely collateral damage in this free for all it appears.

Our bank account sure does not reflect any payoffs or bribes Ken and I have received and the whole deposition as Lin Wood said in a filing will show something completely different. That goes double for what Jackson and Walker feels the need to say about Ken and me right now.

Some times the best defense if your client is in trouble is to go on a strong offense against another party and call it just “advocating”, sadly lawyers do not have to prove things they say in filings, nor can the person being defamed and once again being accused of illegal activities have any recourse for an attorney doing just that.

Like I have said before Mr. Babcock and his wife, Ms. Hamilton, wear the hire gun label with pride, it is all about business and little about truth.

I have redacted those things said that should be covered by the Agreed Protective Order AGAIN, as I have redacted personal information of witnesses and parties to this suit. Ken and I would never want someone else to go through what we have since our address and phone number was made public over 2 years ago. That said, we can not do anything about Harris’ counsel filing this as pubic information on the Harris County Clerk of Court website.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
July 2, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Neil McCabe, Rose Turner, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Virgie Arthur

My high school history teacher use to say that history can not be taught in a moral vacuum. The value system of a text book’s authors plays a part in what events are recorded and in what light. The same can be said of the teacher. Being born in North Carolina in the early 1950’s gave me a good example of this. The text books in the South never used the term Civil War: It was always referred to as the War between the States.

Recently, there has been a lot in news about the Texas Board of education’s curriculum changes. Apparently, the Board felt that the current text had a leftist bias and needed to move to the right. They have come under much criticism. Although I do not agree with all their changes, I do believe that the Tenth Amendment gives them the right to teach Texas children as Texans see fit. However, the value system through which we view history does not empower us to replace fact with fiction.

One report stated that teachers will refer to America as a Constitutional Republic instead of a Democratic Republic. Perhaps this was done to keep children from associating the term, Democratic Republic, with the Democratic and Republican Parties and thereby inferring that the Constitution is equal based on both liberal and conservative values. I do not know their reasoning behind this change; I only know it might lead to a dangerous misconception of our constitution.

Let us explore the meanings of each word and the implications of the two phrases. My 1967 edition of Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language defines a Republic as a state or nation in which the supreme power rest in all the citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives elected by them. There are much more recent definitions but this one seemed the most straight-forward to me. I encourage readers to research for themselves and reach their own conclusions. Constitutional means of or in accordance with the constitution of a government, society, etc. A constitution is the system of fundamental laws and principles of a government, state, society, etc or the document in which these are written down. Democratic is defined as of or for all the people. A democracy is a government by the people, either directly or through representatives. Also, it is defined as the acceptance and practice of the principle of equality of rights, opportunity and treatment.

So all that is required for a government to be considered a Constitution Republic is that it’s based on a system of laws that set forth who is entitled to vote and how the representative government is to be structured. Single party systems, in which only official party members are entitled to vote, qualify as Constitution Republics. Hitler’s Germany, Stalin’s U.S.S.R., Communist China and Vietnam are examples of how far a government can be from that which our fore Fathers intended and still technically be Constitutional Republics.

By added a Bill of Rights and the additions of the thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth and nineteenth amendments, the founding fathers and millions of Americans who followed have made the government set forth in the Constitution a Democratic-Republic. Though the term is not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, it does appear in the writings of many of the delegates to the Philadelphia Convention (the Constitution Convention) when referring to our government.

Though no official title is given in the constitution to the type of government it has empowered, one can easily infer from the Constitution and its amendments that it is a Democratic-Republic. Like they saying goes, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it’s probably a duck.

@Thomas A Salley
June 14, 2010
Used with the permission of Thomas Salley – Political Op Ed Writer for Rose Speaks.com
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, Thomas A. Salley, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: America, American Language, Bill of Rights, Civil War, Communist China, Constitution, Constitution fundamental laws, Constitution fundamental principles, constitution of a government, Constitutional, Constitutional amendments, Constitutional Democratic-Republic, Constitutional meaning, Constitutional Republic, curriculum changes, dangerous misconception constitution, delegates, Democratic and Republican Parties, Democratic Republic, elected representatives, entitled to vote, epresentatives elected by them, equality of opportunity, equality of rights, equality of treatment, fifteenth admenment, founding fathers, fourteenth admendment, fundamental laws, fundamental principles, government, government by the people, high school history, History, history teacher, Hitler’s Germany, it’s probably a duck, Jefferson Davis, liberal and conservative values, moral vacuum, nineteenth amendment, North Carolina, our fore Fathers, our government, Out Going School Board give a gift, Philadelphia Convention, Political Editorial, Political Op Ed, Political Opinion, quacks like a duck, replace fact with fiction, representative government, Rewriting History, Senator Edward "Ted" Kennedy, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Senator Joe McCarthy, Southern Text Books, Stalin’s U.S.S.R., system of laws, teachers, Tenth Amendment, Texas, Texas Board of education, Texas children, Texas school text books, Texas Text Books, text book’s authors, the Constitution Convention, thirteenth amendment, Thomas A Salley, Thomas Jefferson, U. S. Constitution, U. S. Constitutional Republic, U. S. Democratic Republic, United States, Vietnam, walks like a duck, War between the States, Webster’s New World Dictionary

Tuesday April 27, 2010 at 11pm CDT the blog and forum be temporarily closed for updating. We will be back up as soon as it is finished.

UPDATE: It will be tomorrow night, Wednesday April 28, that we will be temporarily closed for updating.

I tried to watch the Academy County Music Awards show Sunday night but just could not make all the way through. Instead of being broadcast from Nashville, This years awards were presented at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. It was a very big production and I’m sure many who were in attendance or who were watching it on CBS enjoyed it very much. I could not because I was swept away with nostalgia and had to change the channel.

The open number was a rock classic and not a country song. Laura Bell Bundy’s big dance number of her debut single, Giddy On Up, look more like a performance from Madonna, Brittany Spears or Lady Gaga, than Loretta Lynn, Tammy Wynette, Dolly Parton or Reba McEntire. The awards may have been for country music but I’m not sure the show could be called country. There was no mention of the Grand Ole Opry, Nashville or the Ryman, which has been called the Mother Church of Country Music. It’s true that time and country music have moved on with time, but has it lost contact with the roots that made it county?

Maybe the fact that it was the ACM awards and not the CMA awards that made a difference. The Country Music Association, CMA, was founded in Nashville in 1958 and has a closer attachment to the Ryman. The ACM was founded in Los Angeles, California in 1964 and in the beginning had closer ties to Bakersfield artist than Nashville insiders.

Whatever the reason, the changing times, ACM vs. CMA politics, or the influence of Las Vegas and the MGM Grand, as big a production as it was, it could not hold this country boy’s attention.

Rose Speaks.com has the privilege to announce the addition of Thomas A. Salley as one of our feature writers. Mr. Salley in the future will be writing political opinions for Rose Speaks.com as well as other things.

@Thomas A Salley
April 23, 2010
Used with the permission of Thomas Salley – guest writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, Thomas A. Salley, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Academy County Music Awards, ACM, ACM vs. CMA, Britany Spears, Brittany Spears, CBS, CBS Productions Inc., CMA, Country Music Association, Dolly Parton, Giddy On Up, Grand Ole Opry, Lady Gaga, Las Vegas, Las Vegas Nevada, Laura Bell Bundy, Loretta Lynn, Madonna, MGM Grand, MGM Grand in Las Vegas, Mother Church of Country Music, Nashville insiders, Nashville Tennessee, Reba McEntire, Ryman Auditorium Nashville Tennessee, Tammy Wynette, The Country Music Association, The Grand Ole Opry, Thomas A Salley

In filings today with the Ninth Court of Federal Appeals the Estate for Anna Nicole Smith = Dannielynn, filed for a Rehearing and/or a Rehearing En Banc [full court]. The filing points out that the same three judge panel is what propel this case to the U. S. Supreme Court of which Anna Nicole Smith won in a 9-1 decision in May 2006. Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate asked for an Extension to file this Request for Rehearing on March 26.

I predicted after the attorney, Kent L. Richland, for the Estate said they were looking at a return to the U. S. Supreme Court that we would be going for round two and here we are. This will take some time because Elaine Marshall on behalf of the Estate for Pierce Marshall, Smith’s long time adversary – enemy will file to a Response to deny any rehearing, the ninth circuit court will make it’s decision but look for it to end up back in the U. S. Supreme Court for round two. There is just way too much money at stake for either side to walk away from.

NEW PAPERS IN SOUTH CAROLINA FEDERAL COURT IN THE ESTATE OF ANNA NICOLE SMITH VS. G. BEN THOMPSON AND FORD SHELLEY.

April 5, 2010 Court Order appointing G. Ben Thompson as a Pro Se Defendant in the South Carolina Federal Court.

NEW PAPERS IN HARRIS COUNTY 80TH DISTRICT COURT IN VIRGIE ARTHUR VS. HOWARD K. STERN, TMZ.COM, HARVEY LEVIN, LARRY BIRKHEAD ET AL. IN HOUSTON TEXAS.

April 6, 2010 Parties Partially Agreed Motion to Continuance of the Deadlines in the 80th District Court Harris County.

April 6, 2010 Notice of Docket Submission for April 19, 2010 for the Partially Agreed Motion for Continuance.

April 7, 2010 Notice of Associated Counsel by TMZ.com and Harvey Levin.

April 7, 2010 Proposed Docket Control Order.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
April 8, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith Heir, Anna Nicole Smith's daughter, Anna Nicole Smith's Estate, Anna Nicole Smith's Will, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, Bruce S. Ross Esq., CBS-ET, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Dannielynn, Elaine Marshall, Entertainment Tonight, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, Kent L. Richiand Esq., Kent L. Richland, Kent Richiand, Kent Richland Esq., L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Neil McCabe, Philip W. Boesch Jr. Esq., Pierce Marshall, Pierce Marshall Estate, Rehearing En Banc, Rose Turner, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, U. S. Ninth Court of Appeals, U. S. Supreme Court, Virgie Arthur

It has been brought to my attention that a blogger on another site that I have great respect for is under a misconception of the Texas State Statutes. Yes I know most of you think we should leave the U. S. and it would be good riddance, However do not judge all of us on sound bites made to make us look like ignorant yokels. My deposition is not over until every party’s counsel gets to ask me every question they want to. Lawyers have jobs, it is not normally personal with them it is what they do for a living. Their ethics require them to be the fiercest advocate for their respective clients, and that is why the lawyers in this case are some of the best in the nation and make those mega bucks.

Texas Statute governing Depositions versus Federal Statues. As we always encourage each of you that read at Rose Speaks.com, let Google be your friend.

A Sworn statement cannot be used at trial in Texas a deposition can be used in Texas in trial.

For use at trial, all parties need a deposition, not a sworn statement. Sworn statements and affidavits are useful for some purposes, such as to support or defeat a special appearance or a motion for summary judgment, but they are not admissible at trial. A deposition is admissible at trial in a civil case.

Here are the statutes governing deposition versus a witness or a party that is not available for trial.

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE

As amended through January 1, 2007

Rule 801. Definitions

The following definitions apply under this article:

(a) Statement. A “statement” is (1) an oral or written verbal expression or (2) nonverbal conduct of a person, if it is intended by the person as a substitute for verbal expression.

(b) Declarant. A “declarant” is a person who makes a statement.

(c) Matter Asserted. “Matter asserted” includes any matter explicitly asserted, and any matter implied by a statement, if the probative value of the statement as offered flows from declarant’s belief as to the matter.

…(3) Depositions. In a civil case, it is a deposition taken in the same proceeding, as same proceeding is defined in Rule of Civil Procedure 207. Unavailability of deponent is not a requirement for admissibility.

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

As amended through December 1, 2009

Rule 804.

(a) Definition of unavailability. “Unavailability as a witness” includes situations in which the declarant- ….

…(4) is unable to be present or to testify at the hearing because of death or then existing physical or mental illness or infirmity; ….

…(1) Former testimony. Testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a deposition taken in compliance with law in the course of the same or another proceeding, if the party against whom the testimony is now offered, or, in a civil action or proceeding, a predecessor in interest, had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination.

With that said, I will share only a tad of my answers today during the fist session of my deposition.

1. It was videotape for the Court and/or jury trial in fact the lawyers continued to say “Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury”, I asked why since there was no jury there today and learned something new about why attorneys say that in Texas if not in every state.

2. I have consistently maintained that I believe that Howard K. Stern got a raw deal in Florida, and I continue to repeat that as I did several times today.

3. I had no reason to believe that Stern has not been honest, forthcoming and sincere in all of the discovery in this or any other case I know about.

4. As I said today and made it clear I would continue to say even on my death bed, there is no defamation and no conspiracy to defame.

With that said, some of the defendants do not have clean hands, and some of them have made this very difficult in both money and time because they have not been forthcoming in my opinion.

AGAIN LET ME SAY I AM NO ONE’S STAR WITNESS, I AM NOT ON ANYONE’S SIDE IN THIS. As a matter of law the court did find I had colluded with Virgie Arthur’s counsel which is not illegal in Texas and so stated during it’s July or August Written Order, HOWEVER THAT SAID there is also no doubt in my mind that CBS’ attorneys did collude with Art Harris in order to piggy back off of him to come into the case early. AGAIN IN MY OPINION THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. The Court of Appeals in Texas in the Flack decision also stated that a defendant can be settling with nothing nefarious going on between the parties.

I did lean today from one of my co-defendants attorney that any of the defendants can file to keep me in this case, although the attorney who shared that with me indicated they would not be going in that direction, I did need to be aware of that.

I have NOW posted my Settlement Agreement with Ms. Arthur in the members only forum section. I have done this because although I have the right to keep that private from the public and the members of this site, I have insisted that it be made public for all to see, because I have always said I will be transparent. I will also ask when it is appropriate based on some of the information deemed confidential and/or covered by the Agreed Protective Order that a transcript of my deposition also be released to the public for all to read.

PLEASE ALSO CHECK THE NOTICE OF THE SERVER WE ARE WITH WILL BE DOING MAINTENANCE OVER TWO NIGHTS THIS WEEKEND.

Ken and I wish all of you a blessed Easter and hope each of you are with those you love.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
April 2, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, CBS-ET, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Dannielynn, Don Clark, Entertainment Tonight, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Neil McCabe, Rose Speaks, Rose Turner, rosespeaks.com, Teresa Stephens, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Virgie Arthur

We received a cease an email about reporting Rose Speaks.com for identify theft and also to major search engines to remove these links. This email is NOT from an attorney but appears to be from a friend of Kat. By the way we never got the first notice.

“2 AND NOTICE
All e-mails are being recorded for future records

IN Behalf of Khatun “Kat” Vardanians Family
To rosespeaks.com /desperateexes.com and affiliates

To whom it my concern

Hello my name is Victor. XXXXXXXX I am rating u this later in behalf of the name of Khatun “Kat” Vardanians family. To remove the (link blog or the topic) about Khatun “Kat” Vardanyan form your web site, there is lots of incorrect and unproven information in the article that has been published by Mr. John Nazarian. Witch could lead to a lawsuit agents hem in the future, for sheering some ones legal name with date of birth and the rest of the information on the internet.

Furthermore brutally crashing her reputation and name with no facts and no type of knowledge about the her side of the story.

If Mr. John Nazarian a fair and reputable person like he says, he is in he’s website, and he wants to publish an article or gat a general idea about the topic on (blog or internet) which is legal to do. First he MUST ask permission from both sides of the family’s interview them to put together the real and true story, and then do something such as this without disclosing unpermitted identity legal information on the internet.

We already reported to Google Blog Yahoo and the rest of the major search engine companies as an identity theft and dangers material links. Soon they will block the links we are asking you kindly to remove the topic from your site to prevent from future impact to your online company.

We appreciate your cooperation and understating in advents.

Thank you”

Ok first off Victor are you a member of Kat’s family? Are you a lawyer authorized to speak for the family?

Here at Rose Speaks we always offer to put up a written statement disputed any case we cover, just have someone that is authorized to speak on this girl’s behalf.

Now to check PUBLIC arrest records, let’s do a little search for those records:

First go to:

www.lasd.org/.

The is the Los Angels Sheriff’s Department web site..

Or go straight to this page which is also part of the Los Angels Sheriff’s Department as well.

http://www.lasd.org/inmate-information.html

Click on Continue to Inmate Information page

http://app4.lasd.org/iic/ajis_search.cfm

On this page type in last name then first name and then click on Search

Please click on the Booking No. for detailed information.

Search Result

ALSO KNOWN AS (AKA)
Booking No. Last Name First Name Middle Name Sex Race Date Of Birth Age
VARDANIAN KHATUN F O 04/30/1989 20

VARDANIAN KHATUN F O 04/30/1989 20
Total Records matched: 2

Click on the second case number of 2275561 and you will get the below. You know I am sorry for Kat, she is in the public records domain now, but I feel worse for Mike’s parents, family and friends.

Booking No.: 2275561 Last Name: VARDANIAN First Name: KHATUN Middle Name:

Sex: F Race: O Date Of Birth: 04/30/1989 Age: 20 Hair: BLK Eyes: BRO Height: 505 Weight: 135 Charge Level: F (Felony)

ARREST

Arrest Date: 03/26/2010 Arrest Time: 1100 Arrest Agency: 9294 Agency Description: SUPR CRT-VAN NUYS,NOWEST

Date Booked: 03/26/2010 Time Booked: 1244 Booking Location: M100 Location Description: CRT – VAN NUYS MUNI DIV 100

BAIL

Total Bail Amount: 1,000,000.00 Total Hold Bail Amount: 0.00 Grand Total: 1,000,000.00

HOUSING LOCATION

Housing Location: CRDF

Permanent Housing Assigned Date: 03/29/2010 Assigned Time: 0901 Visitor Status: N

Facility: CENTURY REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY Address: 11705 ALAMEDA STREET City: LYNWOOD

Public Visiting Guidelines Facility Visiting Schedule

For County facility visiting hours, Please call (213) 473-6080 at Inmate Information Center.

COURT

Next Court Code: M112 Next Court Date: 04/07/2010 Next Court Time: 0830 Next Court Case: LA06469201

Court Name: VAN NUYS MUNI CT DIV 112
Court Address: 14400 ERWIN STREET MALL Court City: VAN NUYSUPT

RELEASE

No Information On Release Date.

CASE INFORMATION

Case No. Court Name Court Address Court City Bail Amt. Fine Amt. Court Date Sent. Date Sent.
Day(s) Disp Code LA06469201 1,000,000.00 .00 04/07/2010 0
Click on specific Case No. for detailed information.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

I did not have time to search down Kat’s public mug shot.

©Rose Turner
April 1, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Desperateexes.com, High Profile Trials, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Kat Vardanian, KHATUN "Kat" VARDANIAN, KHATUN VARDANIAN, Khatun Vardanian arrested for murder, Khatun Vardanian’s arraignment, Los Angels Sheriff’s Department, Mike Yepremuyan, teen murdered