Final Opinion on 2nd Appellate Court of California vs. Dr. Khristine Eroshevich and Howard K. Stern. I have not read it yet so will give my opinion after I read it and after I ask for on record statements.

March 28, 2018 Final Opinion from 2nd Appellate Court on California vs Stern (78)

For reference sake this article we had in October 2012 states most of the same things. That article was titled; Howard K Stern and Dr. Khristine Erosovich has Major loss as California Appeals Court Reverses and Remands back to Judge Robert Perry”. This latest opinion has added two more pages but so far as I read it is just the same as last year.

After I read through this I will be back with more to say! So stay tuned to Rose Speaks.com tonight as we unravel what this opinion actually means and share what you think it means after you read it!!!!!

Am I the only one who thinks California should just let this go and not keep spending tax payers money of a selected case to prosecute?

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
March 28, 2013
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Tags: Adam Braun Esq., Anna Nicole Smith, Beverly Hills, Brad Brunon, Brad Brunon Esq., Bradley Brunon, Bradley Brunon Esq., Bruce Ross Esq., California Medical Board, Cedars Sinai, Celebrity Trials, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, David Barkhurst, Defense attorney Chris Smith, Deputy District Attorney David Barkhurst, Deputy District Attorney David Walgren, Deputy District Attorney Rene Rose, Deputy District Attorney Renee Rose, Desperateexes.com, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Garofalo Esq., Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., Estate of Anna Nicole smith, Harland Braun criminal lawyer, Harland Braun Esq., High Profile Trials, Hollyweird, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollyweird Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Chris Smith Esq., J. Christopher "Chris" Smith Esq., J. Christopher Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Judge Perry, Judge Perry California Superior Court, Judge Robert L. Perry, Judge Robert Perry, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Los Angeles, Los Angeles District Attorney, misdemeanor with probation, Neil McCabe, Nicole White, Prosecutor Rene Rose, pseudonym is a felony, pseudonym names, Rene Rose Esq., Renee Rose, Ron Rale Esq., Rose Speaks Face Book, Rose Speaks Twitter, Sean Carney, State Bar of California, Steve Cooley, Steve Cooley Esq., Steve Sadow Esq., Superior Court Judge Robert J. Perry, Superior Court Judge Robert Perry, the “real” Anna Nicole Smith, UCLA Medical Center, Virgie Arthur

Last night John J. Nazarian sent out the following email as well as on Twitter and Face Book:

“Hear me live tomorrow at 6pm Pacific Time on my new show Straight Talk with John J Nazarian at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/john-j-nazarian. This will be every Sunday night for one hour and will go to five nights a week shortly after. Some of you will be surprised and most of you will ask what took so long, it will be me unedited and telling it like it is. There will be guests and a few celeb’s of course; it will be my thoughts and opinions of many subjects.”

I am very excited that John is jumping into radio and will bet he will be syndicated in a few months at most. I look forward to his guests and the celebs that will appear, just think who all John knows and who all wants to debate with John.

I have been invited to debate with John Nazarian about the Casey Anthony trial, I believe our judicial system works, Nazarian feels it failed bad in that case. That announcement on his new site of Straight Talk with John J. Nazarian states:

“Sept. 4, 2011 6 PM PDT CASEY ANTHONY LATEST GUEST: ROSE TURNER- John offers insight about the case and debates with Rose of RoseSpeaks.com about the case.. the trial .. and the outcome. Where is Anthony now. Is her life really in danger? How do you feel about the potential she will profit from the case. Could she ever face lesser charges? or is she free and clear. Viewer feedback lines will be open.”

Nazarian’s guest today, his premiere show, is Vee Foster and among other things they will be talking about both Anna Nicole Smith, the 4+ years of cases and Michael Jackson and the upcoming trial of Dr. Conrad Murray. The site says:

“August 21, 2011 Straight Talk with John J. Nazarian Celebrity PI Premiers at 6 PM PDT. GUEST: Ve Foster investigative journalist. Get to know the real John, his thoughts, cases, call in and ask him a question or just say Hi.”

I will be on today’s show briefly, of course promoting the way we cover trials which we believe is different than most sites.

Be sure to tune in today at 6 PM PDT, 7 PM MDT, 8 PM CDT and 9 PM EDT and for the weeks to come. My bet is that Nazarian with the controversy that comes with him, will be an instant hit. Ken and I both are in the category of: “most of you will ask what took so long”.

Be sure and tune in today, it should be fun, entertaining and enlightening.

Join other posters to discuss all of the cases we cover. Diamond Girl runs the community part of the site and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/ I seldom step on the forums that belongs to the members and is in great hands with Diamond Girl and she will be having a robust discussion there that all of you are invited to join

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
August 21, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Beverly Hills, Blog Talk Radio, Casey Anthony, Casey Anthony trial, Caylee Anthony, Celebrity Trials, Dannielynn, Desperateexes.com, Dr. Conrad Murray, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian Celebrity PI, John J. Nazarian P. I., Michael Jackson, Rose Face Book, Rose Speaks Community Forum, Rose Speaks Face Book, Rose Speaks Twitter, Rose Speaks.com, Steve Sadow Esq., Straight Talk with John J Nazarian

Ok folks, Dr. Conrad Murray heads to opening statements on May 9, 2011, trial to be televised. As of today the latest “defense” is Michael Jackson was so depressed and scared about money he killed himself. Ah the Google alerts pouring in, and the rumor that one of Murray’s top lawyers has been offered a “reality show” at the end of the trial.

There is a hearing on April 11, 2011 at 10:00 A. M. on Howard Mann and Vintage Pop Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit initiated by the Executors and Administrators of Jackson’s Estate, John Branca and John McClain. In scanning through the exhibits I came across one that Joe and Katherine Jackson with some of the other family members went bankrupt in 2000 and in 2002 the Bankruptcy Trustee sold some of the rights to Howard Mann. So this suit might not be as open and shut as it looks. I suggest you download the papers and let us know what you think:

March 14, 2011 Howard Mann Motion to Dismiss Estate's Original Complaint (265)
March 14, 2011 Howard Mann Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Estate's Original Complaint (298)

On the same date at the same time the Court will be hearing the Request for Judicial Ruling by Howard Mann and Vintage Pop here are those papers:

March 14, 2011 Howard Mann Request for Judicial Notice to Dismiss Estate's Original Complaint (254)
March 14, 2011 Howard Mann Exhibits 1, 2 and 3 filed with the Request for Judicial Notice to Dismiss Estate's Original Complaint (264)
March 14, 2011 Howard Mann Exhibit 4, part 1 filed with the Request for Judicial Notice to Dismiss Estate's Original Complaint (260)
March 14, 2011 Howard Mann Exhibit 4, part 2 filed with the Request for Judicial Notice to Dismiss Estate's Original Complaint (254)
March 14, 2011 Howard Mann Exhibits 5 and 6 filed with the Request for Judicial Notice to Dismiss Estate's Original Complaint (251)

Then there are the required Notice of Interested Parties, Joiner in the Motions, the Opposition Reply by the Estate and the Response to the Reply by Mann and Vintage Pop. All of these are set for hearing in Los Angeles Federal Court if you are in town that day, drop by listen to the lawyers and tell us what you think and more important what all of this is going to end up costing Michael Jackson’s three children. It gives greed a whole new meaning.

March 16, 2011 Howard Mann and Vintage Pop Notice of Interested Parties (326)
March 16, 2011 Howard Mann and Vintage Pop Notice to Court and the Estate of Michael Jacksion that Vintage Pop Joins in the Motion to Dismiss. (481)
March 21, 2011 Estate of Michael Jackson Opposition to Howard Mann and Vintage Pop Motion to Dismiss. (423)
March 21, 2011 Estate of Michael Jackson Exhibit A filed with Opposition to Howard Mann and Vintage Pop Motion to Dismiss. (268)
March 21, 2011 Estate of Michael Jackson Opposition to Howard Mann Request for Judicial Notice (573)
March 28, 2011 Howard Mann Reply Brief to Estate of Michael Jackson Opposition to Mann's Motion to Dismiss Suit. (170)

Just to make sure you have all of the documents that lead up to this hearing, here is the Original Complaint by the Estate of Michael Jackson filed against Howard Mann, Vintage Pop et. al.

Jan 20, 2011 Estate Orginal Complaint Against Howard Mann and Vintage Pop (286)
Jan 20, 2011 Estate Orginal Complaint Exhibit A Against Howard Mann and Vintage Pop (248)
Jan 20, 2011 Estate Orginal Complaint Exhibit B Against Howard Mann and Vintage Pop (245)
Jan 20, 2011 Estate Orginal Complaint Exhibit C Against Howard Mann and Vintage Pop (245)
Jan 20, 2011 Estate Orginal Complaint Exhibit D Against Howard Mann and Vintage Pop (245)
Jan 20, 2011 Estate Orginal Complaint Exhibit E Against Howard Mann and Vintage Pop (250)
Jan 20, 2011 Estate Orginal Complaint Exhibit F Against Howard Mann and Vintage Pop (259)
Jan 20, 2011 Estate Orginal Complaint Exhibit G Against Howard Mann and Vintage Pop (240)

We are getting the Michael Jackson documents connected first under the new software, and as every time we have changed, simplified, tried to make the site more user friendly there are a LOT of burbs. THE ONLY DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE TO DOWNLOAD ON THE SITE ARE THE ONES LISTED ON THE NEW DOWNLOAD SECTION AT THE UPPER TOP RIGHT HAND SIDE. We are tweaking with the coding. So far the I. E. browser is user friendly with the downloads; Fire Fox is not as much, you have to line your mouse up towards the left hand side of the error on the download button to get the document, EXCEPT when you download them from the article. Thus like with this one of the multiple Michael Jackson trials we will list all of the documents in the articles. We are trying to see what happens if you use Chrome. WE FULLY expect to have this all tweaked and working for all browsers by no later than Saturday. IF YOU WANT A DOCUMENT FROM AN OLDER TRIAL (I. E. MOST OF THE ANNA NICOLE SMITH CASES) EMAIL US AND WE WILL GET IT TO YOU ON AN INDIVIDUAL REQUEST We will be doing a short article everyday with the list of downloads that have been transferred to the new system, but also check the Download page daily.

Now with all of that said we have televised trials coming up. I have three sites I like if you intend to watch the Casey Anthony Case that we will do brief lead-in articles on their daily coverage. If you have a site you like let us know and we will contact the owners to see what we can work out with them. IF YOU want an area to discuss the Casey Anthony trial get with Diamond Girl to get a general discussion area for the trial in the community section. We have several members that will be watching that trial as well as several that will be watching the Dr. Conrad Murray Manslaughter trial. Again you can get in touch with Diamond Girl if you want a daily general discussion section set up in the community during Murray’s Trial.

If you want to twitter during the coverage of either trials here to our site email us and we will get that set up. We are going to be enlarging the area on the side of each main page for twitters during both trials.

Ken and I with our administrators and moderators want to thank you for flying RoseSpeaks.com

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks and see who Rose Speaks is following.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl runs that entire section don’t hesitate to contact her to make suggestions on how this forum is more user friendly.

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.

©Rose Turner
April 7, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: All things Michael Jackson, Anna Nicole Smith, April 11 2011 at 10:00 A. M, Arnie Klein, Beverly Hills, Bryan Cave LLP, Casey Anthony, Casey Anthony Case, Caylee Anthony, Celebrity Trials, Chernoff & Alford, Dr. Arnold Klein, Dr. Conrad Murray, Dr. Conrad Murray Manslaughter trial, Edward M. Chernoff, Executors and Administrators, Executors and Administrators of Jackson's Estate, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, George and Cindy Anthony, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, HOWARD MANN, Howard Mann and Vintage Pop Motion to Dismiss, Joe and Katherine Jackson, Joe Jackson, JOHN BRANCA, John McClain, Jose Baez, Katherine Jackson, Ken and Rose Turner, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Michael Jackson, Michael Jackson Will, Michael Jackson's Estate, Motion to Dismiss, Nicole Jennings Wade, Request for Judicial Ruling by Howard Mann and Vintage Pop, Rita Cosby, Rose Speaks, Rose Speaks Face Book, Rose Speaks Twitter, Steve Sadow Esq., Vintage Pop

What caught my attention in this trial is that in the Houston Chronicle coverage there is mention of a lot of names that overlap all things Anna Nicole Smith trials.

At one point the Houston Chronicle says; “So how corrupt is the local scene? It all depends on what you compare it to, said Rice University political science chairman Mark Jones. “If you reference Chicago,” he said, “it’d be more similar. To Minneapolis? More corrupt.”

I have said many times since I return to Texas in 1990, what happened to “my Texas”, the one I grew up in and moved out of in 1977.

Who is Jerry Eversole? He is a County Commissioner in Harris County Texas that has been slammed with four federal indictments accusing him of accepting bribes and filing false income tax returns.

After demanding a quick and speedy trial after being indicted at the end of December 2010 and a three week trial in March 2011, the case went to the federal jury last Friday, March 25, 2011, with the defense led by fame Texas defense lawyer Rusty Hardin, deciding to put on NO defense. Rather it was the hint of the good ole boys and just friends helping friends like we do in Texas that Hardin rested on. Was it a gamble, yes per court analysts. Hardin of the fame J. Pierce Marshall and Anna Nicole Smith Probate fight way back in the early nineties, decided to take the same position that Steve Sadow did with Howard K. Stern in California. Very simply put, the U. S. government did not put on a case that Hardin felt was based on facts and so no defense other than friends do favors for friends in his closing arguments was his choice as a defense for Jerry Eversole.

The Houston Chronicle article also mentioned one of our old friends, Judge Tony Lindsay and the hot water her husband Jon Lindsay landed in 1993. That’s the year six-term Harris County Judge Jon Lindsay called it quits after being indicted for perjury, accused of lying on a campaign finance report and being accused by a federal convict of accepting a bribe to reroute a county road to boost the prospects of a housing development. The perjury indictments eventually were thrown out, and no criminal charges resulted from the bribery allegation. Still, Lindsay suffered a battering at the hands of then-County Attorney Mike Driscoll, who filed suit to remove the judge from office. Even that, however, was not enough to keep him out of office, as Lindsay went on to represent northern Harris County in the state Senate from 1996-2006.

The jury deliberated two hours on Friday and returned this morning and is deliberating again on the charges of alleged bribes cited by prosecutors included $17,000 Eversole received in landscaping, $30,000 in antique firearms, and $63,000 to pay off his mortgage. Eversole also was charged with filing false income tax returns in connection with the benefits.

Jerry Eversole’s friend Michael Surface also was indicted in December and is expected to go to trial in October. Defense attorneys maintain that prosecutors are “criminalizing” a 30-year friendship.

The other thing that caught my attention is the Judge Sharon Keller ongoing problems with the Texas state congress trying to impeach her and there has been another charge against her with the State Bar to disbar her, she was fined $100,000.00 by the Texas Ethics Commission, the highest ever fine, Jerry Eversole holds the second highest ever levied at a record $75,000 against him for campaign finance violations. If convicted Eversole could receive a maximum of 21 years in prison and $700,000 in fines.

Is this the beginning of cleaning up the Texas politics of hey friends help friends, or will it be business as usual and Jerry Eversole will walk this week?

Read the indictment and other papers filed before this quick trial and tell us if you think Eversole will walk?

12-20-10-Indictment (262)
12-28-10-Protective-Order (259)
1-10-11 Eversole Motion Limine (421)
1-11-11-Order-Allow-Additional-Motions (246)
1-11-11-Order-Setting-Deadline-Pretrial-Motions (241)
1-18-11-Order-Deny-Eversole-Request-Contact-Surface (247)
1-19-11-Motion-Severance-Trial.pdf (95)
1-24-11 Surface Motion Continuance (295)
1-24-11-USA-Response-Surface-Motion-Countinuance (237)
1-26-11-Surface-Reply-Continuance (365)
1-27-11-Order-Granting-Severance (247)
2-7-11-Order-Setting-Deadlines (250)
2-9-11-Eversole-Opposition-USA-Motion-Discovery (243)
2-9-11-USA-Motion-Discovery (270)
2-15-11-Eversole-Motion-Disclosure-Evidence (241)
2-16-11-Order-Granting-Part-Discovery (244)
2-17-11-Order-Granting-Motion-Disclosure (242)
2-28-11-USA-Trial-Memorandum (263)
3-6-11 USA Motion Limine (248)
3-8-11-Eversole-Response-USA-Motion-Limine (249)

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks and see who Rose Speaks is following.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.

©Rose Turner
March 28, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: "criminalizing" a 30-year friendship, $17 thousand Eversole received in landscaping, $30 thousand in antique firearms, accepting bribes, alleged bribes, and $63 thousand to pay off his mortgage, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith trials, campaign finance violations, charged with filing false income tax returns, Chicago, cleaning up the Texas politics, Eversole could receive $700 thousand in fines, Eversole could receive a maximum of 21 years in prison and $700 thousand in fines, Eversole maximum 21 years in prison, fame Texas defense lawyer, fame Texas defense lawyer Rusty Hardin, federal jury, filing false income tax returns, four federal indictments, friends helping friends, Harris County Attorney Mike Driscoll, Harris County County Commissioner, High Profile Trials, hint of the good ole boys, Houston Chronicle, Howard K Stern, J. Pierce Marshall, Jerry Eversole, Jerry Eversole charged with filing false income tax returns, Jerry Eversole Harris County Commissioner, Jerry Eversole Trial, Jon Lindsay, Jon Lindsay represent northern Harris County in the state Senate, Judge Sharon Keller, Judge Tony Lindsay, Mark Jones, Michael Surface, Minneapolis, northern Harris County in the state Senate from 1996-2006, retired Judge Tony Lindsay, Rice University, Rice University political science chairman, Rice University political science chairman Mark Jones, Rusty Hardin, Rusty Hardin Esq., Sharon Keller fined $100 thousand by the Texas Ethics Commission, six-term Harris County Judge Jon Lindsay, Steve Sadow Esq., Texas Ethics Commission, Texas Ethics Commission fined Eversole $75 thousand

Seldom do I ever get a chance to just unwind and relax and think nothing except just the food I am eating. Well I got together with a ‘re-new’ old friend, does that make any sense? Let me explain, I met Daniel DiCriscio years ago, a very long time ago. He was employed at the Jose Eber Salon and had just launched his music career. Funny as it seems I remember that CD and it was not bad. I was developing my new business and offices and Daniel was busy with his hair and as I said his music. This guy has some real talent other than being ‘Daniel’. Go ahead and Google him, after you Google me.

Recently his mom died and we communicated both by phone and email and I could hear the pain in his voice as well as in his writings. His emotions were ones that had escaped me during similar circumstances that I had and I felt bad that he was at a loss in his mother’s death. We spoke further and again, it was good for me in away that is hard for me to explain.

Well through the last couple of years Daniel has assisted me in a few projects and he, like myself are tough to miss. He has a presence! The great blond hair and of course his style of dress, too bad those in power during the Anna Nicole Show missed him and found that ‘mess’ who played too many episodes. Booby Bobby or Bobby Boob, whatever. The two of us make an interesting ‘set’, black and white, sour and sweet, Beauty and , well enough, you get my point.

I suggested we get together for a bite to eat and the amazing thing here is that we are both very entertaining when it comes to the rich and famous. It was to the point I was wondering how have we missed what could be one of the best duos since Dean and Jerry, Amos and Andy, Jan and Dean, and maybe even Mutt and Jeff. My point here is that we could both have a new career, we had each other laughing and on serious points we were both on target. Especially, our thoughts on Anna Nicole Smith as well as others both in and out of Hollywood. My perspective is sarcastic and stinging; Daniel has what I call a ‘snap’, like get over it. Call me a little odd, but I was very entertained and realized it was just him and me.

I am posting this picture to make my point, when it comes to ‘Hollywood Insiders’ no one can come close to either one of us. And we both understand how far to the line we can come after all of these years bumping around Hollywood. Speaking for myself, there are things that I would never speak of and a book, is never going to happen. For Daniel the stories about Elizabeth Taylor alone could fill two chapters in his book. My time with Miss Taylor could fill maybe ten pages….thanks Adam! I recall my first encounter with Peerez Hilton and thought, “ Beast “, and having to do a short pilot with him, Lisa Stanley of KRTH ( she is the best ) and Ryan Seacrest’s assistant, what’s her name……the painful part was Peerez Hilton…and those feet!

All I am saying is watch, there could very well be some very interesting ‘tea’ coming along and presented in away that only two people in this town could present, John & Daniel or Daniel & John……that will be a hump to stroll over…..in time.

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks and see who Rose Speaks is following.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.

©John J. Nazarian
March 22, 2011
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: a ‘snap’, ABC Network, Access Hollywood, Amos and Andy, an interesting ‘set’, Anna Nicole Show, Anna Nicole Smith, Anthony Pellicano, Beauty and, Beauty and Beast, Beverly Hills, black and white, Bobby Boob, Bobby Trendy, Booby Bobby, both have a new career, both in and out of Hollywood, both on target, both very entertaining, bumping around Hollywood, Call me a little odd, Carlos Diaz, CBS-ET, Celebrity Trials, Daniel & John, Daniel DiCriscio, Daniel DiCriscio Exclusive, Daniel DiCriscio Messiah of Makeover, Daniel DiCriscio music career, Daniel DiCriscio's CD, Dean and Jerry, Debra Opri, Desperateexes.com, E Online!, each other laughing, Elizabeth Taylor, Entertainment Tonight, Extra Tv, Google him, Google me, Harvey Levin, He has a presence, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Hollywood Insiders, Howard and Anna, hump to stroll over, Jan and Dean, John & Daniel, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Jose Eber, Jose Eber Salon, just him and me, like get over it, Lisa Stanley, Lisa Stanley of KRTH, Mutt and Jeff, NBC Network, no one can come close to either one of us, no one can come close to us, one of the best duos, Peerez Hilton, Phil Spector, picture to make my point, PrezHitton.com, rich and famous, Rita Cosby, Rose Speaks Exclusive, Ryan Seacrest, Ryan Seacrest’s assistant, sarcastic and stinging, serious points we were both on target, ShowBiz Tonight, sour and sweet, Stanley Mosk Court House, stories about Elizabeth Taylor, style of dress, TMZ.com, very interesting ‘tea’ coming along, we are both very entertaining, years bumping around Hollywood, “ Beast “

What started out as the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. Ford Shelley, Gina Shelley, G. Ben Thompson, Gaither Thompson and Melanie Thompson, or known as the Shelley and Thompson Clan of South Carolina. The people who broke into Horizons in the Bahamas and then allegedly sold a lot of tapes and pictures to TMZ (remember the Methadone refrigerator picture), Splash (including the tasteless picture of Daniel Smith in his casket), tons of videos to Fox News including On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, Geraldo Rivera Live, and the list goes on and on. Ford was one of the first to holler, Howard K. Stern did something to Daniel and Anna Nicole Smith, and the first at the trial to say Howard never hurt Anna……… so much for credibility. The question is though where is the money that all of that sold for????

Then enters what has become the big fish, Susan M. Brown Esq., Georgia Attorney and the Susan M. Brown Law Office, did this poor woman get left holding the bag and with the O’Quinn law firm dissolved there is no one to hand it off too. Kind of like playing musical chairs and the one left standing alone when the music stops, that would be Susan M. Brown.

Brown has tap danced for two years with the same song just different steps until she finally had a Northern District of Georgia Federal Court say she had waived the attorney client privilege under the crime fraud act…… NOT good for a lawyer’s resume, not to mention the State Bar of Georgia.

Any Objections to Susan M. Brown’s current lawyers, Joseph C. Wilson IV. and Carl E. Pierce II of Pierce, Herns, Sloan & McLeod LLC, has filed to withdraw as counsel for “the Brown Defendants”, stating it would not cause any prejudice because “the discovery concerning the Brown Defendants has not begun”. Do what??? The court ruled a long time ago that because Brown has been present for all of those depositions there would not be that much extra to tidy up the suit and have it ready for trial.

However the big WHAM in the March 2, 2011 filings is asking and filing the Motion to Withdraw with the grounds set out to substantiate the withdrawing should be in a Memorandum in Support filed UNDER SEAL “Counsel is not aware of any other means to communicate the grounds for withdrawal that would protect the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship and avoid undue prejudice to the Brown Defendants.”

However the case they quote as outweighing the right of the public right to know (I. E. the News media) on its own raises red flags of the potential seriousness of these actions. In the Knight case it states; “we explained that, while a district court has a supervisory power over its own records and may, in its discretion, seal documents if the public’s right of access is outweighed by competing interests, the presumption in such cases favors public access. The public’s right of access to judicial records and documents may be abrogated ONLY IN UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES. Accordingly before a district court may seal any court documents, we held that it must 1) provide public notice of the request to seal and allow interested parties a reasonable opportunity to object. (That date was March 21, 2011 per the South Carolina Federal Court’s Docket). 2) consider less drastic alternatives to sealing the documents, and 3) provide specific reasons and factual findings supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting the alternatives.”

The Motion ends that “Counsel will submit the Memorandum in Support of the Motion to Withdraw to the Court for the Court’s in camera review and shall not file same until further notice from the Court.

Well folks I don’t think there will be any jury selection starting tomorrow, and as of midnight there has been no objections or request for a hearing on the filing being done under seal…

So what do you think Susan M. Brown needs to be protective from “avoid undue prejudice”?

As soon as we have the Court’s decision, and new dates for jury selection will post it, it is noticeable that no lawyer has filed to just transfer the case to them, as new attorney of record, things that make you go Mmmmmmmmmmmm.

HERE ARE THE THREE LATEST FILINGS:

March 2, 2011 Susan M Brown\'s Answer First Amended Complaint (195)
March 2 , 2011 Motion by Counsel for Susand M. Brown and The Brown Law Firm to Wtithdraw (305)
March 2, 2100 Counsel for Susan M Brwon Motion to File Under Seal Memorandum Reason Withdraw as Counsel (297)

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks and see who Rose Speaks is following.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.

©Rose Turner
March 22, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: allegedly sold a lot of tapes and pictures, allow interested parties a reasonable opportunity to object, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith Estate, attorney-client privilege, avoid undue prejudice, avoid undue prejudice to the Brown Defendants, before a district court may seal any court documents, Beverly Hills, Carl E. Pierce II, Carl E. Pierce II Esq., Celebrity Trials, confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship, consider less drastic alternatives to sealing the documents, Court's in camera review, crime fraud act, Daniel Smith, Daniel Smith in his casket, Dannielynn, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, favors public access, filed under seal, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Gaither Thompson and Melanie Thompson, Georgia Attorney, Geralda Rivera Live, Geraldo - Live, Geraldo At Large, Geraldo FOX News, Geraldo Rivera Live, Gina Shelley, Greta Van Sustern Fox News, High Profile Trials, Hollywood, Horizons in the Bahamas, Howard K Stern, John O'Quinn, Joseph C Wilson IV Esq., Joseph C. Wilson IV, L. Lin Wood, Law Offices of Susan M. Brown, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, March 2 2011 filings, March 21 2011, may be abrogated, Memorandum in Support, Memorandum in Support filed under seal, Methadone refrigerator picture, Methodone refrigerator picture, Motion to Withdraw, Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, Neil McCabe, Northern District of Georgia Federal Court, On The Record with Greta Van Susteren, O’Quinn law firm dissolved, Pierce Herns Sloan & McLeod LLC, playing musical chairs, potential seriousness of these actions, presumption in such cases favors public access, protect the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship, provide factual findings, provide public notice of the request to seal, provide specific reasons, provide specific reasons and factual findings supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting the alternatives, public's right of access, public's right of access is outweighed by competing interests, public's right of access may be abrogated only in unusual circumstances, public's right of access to judicial documents, public's right of access to judicial records, public's right of access to judicial records and documents, raises red flag, Shelley and Thompson Clan of South Carolina, South Carolina Federal Court's Docket, Splash, State Bar of Georgia, supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting the alternatives, Susan M. Brown, Susan M. Brown Esq., The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, undue prefudice, Virgie Arthur, waived the attorney client privilege, waived the attorney client privilege under the crime fraud act, withdraw as counsel for "the Brown Defendants

When I look at this picture of Anna Nicole Smith, her son, Daniel Wayne Smith and her lover lawyer Howard K. Stern entering the U. S. Supreme Court five years ago, February 2006, little did anyone know what would happen during the next five years.

Anna Nicole Smith was pregnant with her daughter Dannielynn and the world looked bright, especially in June 2006 when the U. S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Smith had a right to have her appeal sent back to the lower court to decide if she was entitled to any of her deceased husband’s, J. Howard Marshall’s Estate valued over one billion dollars.

Now five years later, once again Howard K. Stern returns to the Supreme Court to hear arguments on Tuesday, January 18, 2011 to address whether Smith’s Estate is entitled to part of the Estate of a deceased husband’s estates which has now been tangled up in court for 15 years. Howard K. Stern returns alone, unless Dannielynn’s father decides to attend with Stern, to see if Smith’s lone heir gets money.

In the last five years, Pierce Marshall has died, Daniel Wayne Smith has died, Anna Nicole Smith has died and John M. O’Quinn died in an accident. Howard K. Stern faced potential career ending charges and a trial to funneling drugs to a “known addict”. Stern was cleared of that on January 6, 2011 by Los Angeles Judge Robert Perry of all charges and his life was given back intact for him to continue to practice law.

On January 10, 2011 Stern filed the Reply to Elaine Marshall’s, Pierce Marshall’s widow, Response dated December 13, 2010, to the Estate of Smith’s Writ of Certiorari filed November 12 2010 with the Supreme Court once again ruling they will hear oral arguments this coming Tuesday and again decide this mega million dollar estate. Any decision by the U. S. Supreme Court will be issued no later than the last Monday of June 2011.

You have to feel a tad sad for Stern to be returning five years later, minus so many important people in his life including the love of his life Smith and her son Daniel.

The attorneys for the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith consists of; Philip W. Boesch Jr. Esq., The Boesch Law Group, Bruce S. Ross, Vivian L. Thoreen, Holland & Knight LLP, Kent L. Richland, Alan Diamond, Edward L. Xanders, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richaland LLP

The attorneys for Elaine Marshall consists of; Roy T. Englert Jr., of Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untreiner and Sauber LLP as well as G. Erin Brunstad Jr., Collin O’Connor Undell, and Matthew J. Delude of Deschert LLP

There has been seven Ameicus Briefs filed by interested groups including the U. S. government, some in favor of Smith’s Estate and some in favor of Marshall.

Here is a list of the other papers filed so you can become acquainted with them to discuss prior to the hearing this Tuesday. The U. S. Supreme Court has three cases it is hearing oral arguments on with this one listed as the last of the three to be heard that day.

November 15, 2010 Ameicus Brief by Legal Professors in Support of Howard K. Stern. The legal professors and lawyers listed are Richard AAron, Laura Bartell, Jagdeep S. Bhandari, Susan Block-Lieb, Robert D’Agostino, Jackie Gardina, Ingrid Hillinger, George W. Kuney, Lois Lupica, C. Scott Pryor, Keith Sharfman, Michael D. Sousa, and Robert M. Ziman.

November 19, 2010 Amercus Brief by. the Bankruptcy Trustees in Support of Howard K. Stern.

November 2010 Ameicus Brief by the United States of America in Support of Howard K. Stern..

December 20, 2010 Ameicus Brief by the National Black Chamber of Commerce in Support of Elaine Marshall.

December 20, 2010 Ameicus Brief by by Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Elaine Marshall.

December 2010 Ameicus Brief by the Center Rule of Law in Support of Elaine Marshall.

December 2010 Ameicus Brief by Legal Professors in Support of Elaine Marshall. The law professors are; S. Todd Brown, G. Marcus Cole, Ronald D. Rotunda, and Todd J. Zywicki

The Three Points the U. S. Supreme Court has decided to hear oral arguments and issue an Opinion on three questions asked to be addressed by Smith’s Estate:

1. Whether the Ninth Circuit opinion, which renders §157(b)(2)(C) surplusage in
light of §157(b)(2)(B), contravenes Congress’ intent in enacting §157(b)(2)(C).

2. Whether Congress may, under Articles I and III, constitutionally authorize core
jurisdiction over debtors’ compulsory counterclaims to proofs of claim.

3. Whether the Ninth Circuit misapplied Marathon and Katchen and contravened this Court’s post-Marathon precedent, creating a circuit split in the process, by holding that Congress cannot constitutionally authorize non-Article III bankruptcy judges to enter final judgment on all compulsory counterclaims to proofs of claim.

I wonder if the Marshall money, like the Hope Diamond is going to be surrounded of the mystic of tragedy attached to it, what do you think?

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to be a guest writer, please send up what you propose to write about via the Contact Us link as well.

©Rose Turner
January 15, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Alan Diamond, Ameicus Briefs, Amicus Curiae, Amicus Curiae Brief, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith and Howard K. Stern, Anna Nicole Smith was pregnant, Bankruptcy Trustees, Beverly Hills, Bruce S. Ross, C. Scott Pryor, Celebrity Trials, Center Rule of Law, compulsory counterclaims, core bankruptcy function, core jurisdiction, Daniel Smith, Daniel Wayne Smith, Dannielynn, de novo review, deceased husband, E. Pierce Marshall, Edward L. Xanders, Edwin Hunter Esq. crime-fraud exception, Elaine Marshall, Englert, Famed Berverly Hills P. I. John J. Nazarian, funneling drugs to a “known addict”, G. Marcus Cole, George W. Kuney, Greines Martin Stein & Richaland LLP, High Profile Trials, Holland & Knight LLP, Hollywood, Howard K Stern, Ingrid Hillinger, J. Howard Marshall, J. Howard Marshall’s Estate, Jackie Gardina, Jagdeep S. Bhandari, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., John O'Quinn, Judge Robert Perry, Keith Sharfman, Kent L. Richland, last Monday of June 2011, Laura Bartell, Legal Professors support Marshall, Legal Professors support Stern, Lois Lupica, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Judge Robert Perry, mega million dollar estate, Michael D. Sousa, National Black Chamber of Commerce, Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal, Ninth Circuit opinion, non-Article III bankruptcy judges, of Robbins, Orseck, Philip W. Boesch Jr. Esq., Pierce Marshall, Richard AAron, Robbins Russell Englert Orseck Untreiner and Sauber LLP, Robert D'Agostino, Robert M. Ziman, Ronald D. Rotunda, Roy T. Englert Jr., Russell, S. Todd Brown, Susan Block-Lieb, The Boesch Law Group, The Center Rule of Law, The Hope Diamond, The Hope Diamond Curse, The Marshall Money Curse, Todd J. Zywicki, U. S. Supreme Court, United States of America, Untreiner and Sauber LLP, Virgie Arthur, Vivian L. Thoreen, Washington Legal Foundation, Writ of Certiorari