Remember Judge Ito in the O. J. Simpson trial? Do you remember that Judge Ito accommodated the D. A. over and over until we came to the gloves if “If they don’t fit you must acquit”. I have wondered if that might be the case in the cans of odor, what if those are opened for the jury and there is no smell?

Now this morning we find that Arpad Vass, PhD, Oak Ridge, (The body farm research facility), on the stand all day yesterday had via trusting the D. A. identified the WRONG can. Not to mention that the body farm is a research facility NOT a forensic laboratory, thus they don’t follow the strict protocol that is in required in criminal cases. This evidence has never been allowed in any court, state or federal since the research facility since it’s creation in 1981. The question is why?

The FBI witness on the one band of hair had a death band on it, again many consider that “junk science”; why? Because it is not reliable and recent studies have confirmed that as late as 2010. I agree there is a first time for any new technique, like DNA to be allowed in court. But in the Casey Anthony case why are we getting so much of never introduced techniques? I mean really the FBI does not even use the hair analysis in federal court and they pay for that research. The body firm is RESEARCH, like going out with a divining rod, made out of a coat hanger to hunt for dead bodies among other new techniques or would that be old techniques.

Why does the D. A. need these many unproven, uncontrolled in chain of evidence new “science” in this case? One might argue they decided Casey Anthony was guilty and have then recreated the evidence to prove that. Nothing wrong with that unless as some believe this was an accident then covered up and not premeditated murder. If the D. A. had DNA, and/or other hard and fast evidence we would not have to take this trip through old science that other courts have found not reliable. If Texas the king of death penalty cases, does not take it and no other state takes it after 20 years, why is there so much of it in one case? I can see one new science introduced, but all of this new “science”, it might be “overkill”, and if so could backfire in my opinion.

What are your thoughts, why are we taking infotainment as the gospel on this case every night; well not here in our home but Nancy Grace’s show has shot off of the charts because she creates the perfect environment of hate and prejudice. Let’s don’t even get into Geraldo Rivera who has been there every day.

What are your thoughts in the area of junk science? Can someone tell me who went back and got the garbage at the tow yard and how did that prove up that chain of evidence? I am worried about our legal system when almost everyone in the U. S. has had access to so many document dumps by any state in what appears to me to be a clear cut attempt to not only tamper a jury pool but to make Casey Anthony the most hated mother in our country.

In case you don’t have it, here is the State’s witness list and when they were added and what they are going to testify about. Florida State Witness List in Florida vs. Casey Anthony (1496)

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl runs that entire section don’t hesitate to contact her to make suggestions on how this forum is more user friendly.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©Rose Turner
June 7, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Ann Finnell, Ann Finnell Esq., Arpad Vass, Body Farm Tennessee, Casey Anthony, Casey Anthony Murder Trial, Caylee Anthony, Cheney Mason, Cheney Mason Esq., Chief Judge Belvin Perry Jr., Cindy Anthony, Day 12 Casey Anthony Trial, Dorothy Simms, Dorothy Simms Esq., Dr. Arpad Vass, First Degree Murder trial Casey Anthony, Florida Appellate Opinions, Frank George., Frank George.Esq., Fusion Restaurant and Bar, George Anthony, High Profile Trials, Ineffectiveness Assistance, Ineffectiveness Assistance of Jose Baez, Jeff Ashton, Jeff Ashton Esq., Jose Baez, Jose Baez Esq., Judge Belvin Perry, Judge Belvin Perry Jr., Judge Blevin Perry, Judge Perry, Judge Tito, Lee Anthony, Linda Burdick, Linda Burdick Esq., O. J. Simpson, Oak Ridge Research Facility, OCSO, Orange County Florida, Orange County Superior Court, Orange County Superior Court Chief Judge Belvin Perry Jr., Orlanda Florida, Orlanda Florida Criminal Defense Laywer Richard Hornsby, Orlando, Orlando Florida, prosecutor Frank George, prosecutor Jeff Ashton, prosecutor Linda Burdick, Rose Speaks Face Book, Rose Speaks Twitter, Sparkman and the Tape, Sparkman v. State

What started out as the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. Ford Shelley, Gina Shelley, G. Ben Thompson, Gaither Thompson and Melanie Thompson, or known as the Shelley and Thompson Clan of South Carolina. The people who broke into Horizons in the Bahamas and then allegedly sold a lot of tapes and pictures to TMZ (remember the Methadone refrigerator picture), Splash (including the tasteless picture of Daniel Smith in his casket), tons of videos to Fox News including On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, Geraldo Rivera Live, and the list goes on and on. Ford was one of the first to holler, Howard K. Stern did something to Daniel and Anna Nicole Smith, and the first at the trial to say Howard never hurt Anna……… so much for credibility. The question is though where is the money that all of that sold for????

Then enters what has become the big fish, Susan M. Brown Esq., Georgia Attorney and the Susan M. Brown Law Office, did this poor woman get left holding the bag and with the O’Quinn law firm dissolved there is no one to hand it off too. Kind of like playing musical chairs and the one left standing alone when the music stops, that would be Susan M. Brown.

Brown has tap danced for two years with the same song just different steps until she finally had a Northern District of Georgia Federal Court say she had waived the attorney client privilege under the crime fraud act…… NOT good for a lawyer’s resume, not to mention the State Bar of Georgia.

Any Objections to Susan M. Brown’s current lawyers, Joseph C. Wilson IV. and Carl E. Pierce II of Pierce, Herns, Sloan & McLeod LLC, has filed to withdraw as counsel for “the Brown Defendants”, stating it would not cause any prejudice because “the discovery concerning the Brown Defendants has not begun”. Do what??? The court ruled a long time ago that because Brown has been present for all of those depositions there would not be that much extra to tidy up the suit and have it ready for trial.

However the big WHAM in the March 2, 2011 filings is asking and filing the Motion to Withdraw with the grounds set out to substantiate the withdrawing should be in a Memorandum in Support filed UNDER SEAL “Counsel is not aware of any other means to communicate the grounds for withdrawal that would protect the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship and avoid undue prejudice to the Brown Defendants.”

However the case they quote as outweighing the right of the public right to know (I. E. the News media) on its own raises red flags of the potential seriousness of these actions. In the Knight case it states; “we explained that, while a district court has a supervisory power over its own records and may, in its discretion, seal documents if the public’s right of access is outweighed by competing interests, the presumption in such cases favors public access. The public’s right of access to judicial records and documents may be abrogated ONLY IN UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES. Accordingly before a district court may seal any court documents, we held that it must 1) provide public notice of the request to seal and allow interested parties a reasonable opportunity to object. (That date was March 21, 2011 per the South Carolina Federal Court’s Docket). 2) consider less drastic alternatives to sealing the documents, and 3) provide specific reasons and factual findings supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting the alternatives.”

The Motion ends that “Counsel will submit the Memorandum in Support of the Motion to Withdraw to the Court for the Court’s in camera review and shall not file same until further notice from the Court.

Well folks I don’t think there will be any jury selection starting tomorrow, and as of midnight there has been no objections or request for a hearing on the filing being done under seal…

So what do you think Susan M. Brown needs to be protective from “avoid undue prejudice”?

As soon as we have the Court’s decision, and new dates for jury selection will post it, it is noticeable that no lawyer has filed to just transfer the case to them, as new attorney of record, things that make you go Mmmmmmmmmmmm.

HERE ARE THE THREE LATEST FILINGS:

March 2, 2011 Susan M Brown\'s Answer First Amended Complaint (196)
March 2 , 2011 Motion by Counsel for Susand M. Brown and The Brown Law Firm to Wtithdraw (306)
March 2, 2100 Counsel for Susan M Brwon Motion to File Under Seal Memorandum Reason Withdraw as Counsel (298)

Follow Us On Face Book at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001254987261 and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/RoseSpeaks and see who Rose Speaks is following.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

We will be listening to all of our readers about new cases. Do you have a tip for us on a case to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL. If you would like to do some articles for Rose Speaks.com send us that information and we will give you our rules for guest writers.

©Rose Turner
March 22, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: allegedly sold a lot of tapes and pictures, allow interested parties a reasonable opportunity to object, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith Estate, attorney-client privilege, avoid undue prejudice, avoid undue prejudice to the Brown Defendants, before a district court may seal any court documents, Beverly Hills, Carl E. Pierce II, Carl E. Pierce II Esq., Celebrity Trials, confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship, consider less drastic alternatives to sealing the documents, Court's in camera review, crime fraud act, Daniel Smith, Daniel Smith in his casket, Dannielynn, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, favors public access, filed under seal, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Gaither Thompson and Melanie Thompson, Georgia Attorney, Geralda Rivera Live, Geraldo - Live, Geraldo At Large, Geraldo FOX News, Geraldo Rivera Live, Gina Shelley, Greta Van Sustern Fox News, High Profile Trials, Hollywood, Horizons in the Bahamas, Howard K Stern, John O'Quinn, Joseph C Wilson IV Esq., Joseph C. Wilson IV, L. Lin Wood, Law Offices of Susan M. Brown, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, March 2 2011 filings, March 21 2011, may be abrogated, Memorandum in Support, Memorandum in Support filed under seal, Methadone refrigerator picture, Methodone refrigerator picture, Motion to Withdraw, Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, Neil McCabe, Northern District of Georgia Federal Court, On The Record with Greta Van Susteren, O’Quinn law firm dissolved, Pierce Herns Sloan & McLeod LLC, playing musical chairs, potential seriousness of these actions, presumption in such cases favors public access, protect the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship, provide factual findings, provide public notice of the request to seal, provide specific reasons, provide specific reasons and factual findings supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting the alternatives, public's right of access, public's right of access is outweighed by competing interests, public's right of access may be abrogated only in unusual circumstances, public's right of access to judicial documents, public's right of access to judicial records, public's right of access to judicial records and documents, raises red flag, Shelley and Thompson Clan of South Carolina, South Carolina Federal Court's Docket, Splash, State Bar of Georgia, supporting its decision to seal the documents and for rejecting the alternatives, Susan M. Brown, Susan M. Brown Esq., The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, undue prefudice, Virgie Arthur, waived the attorney client privilege, waived the attorney client privilege under the crime fraud act, withdraw as counsel for "the Brown Defendants

… “Steve who?”, “ Said what ?”, ahhhhhh Steve Sadow, what next, will we hear Geraldo singing the praises of Howard K. Stern?

…. …Oh for sure the evidence that she has would show “guilt,” but Rene [Rose], you got out-lawyered by the Gentleman from Georgia. Sadow so narrowed what the prosecution could present with the blessing of Judge Perry that it must be like trying to make a nice tomato sauce with no tomatoes! Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley and the rest of these folk must have had a “coming to Jesus” moment. These guys were like the Huns at one time, entering the castle and pillaging in the name of Anna Nicole Smith. “we will save all of her property from those who should have it.” …and now in Judge Perry’s court we have the “Harper Valley PTA.” …All we needed was Sonny and Cher’s wonderful song, “The Beat Goes On” …

… …And of course we have the ultimate secret weapon, Steve Sadow, I never heard of this guy until the publicity picture went up with Steve, Chris, Howard and what’s her name. Howard and I will never forget that picture and announcement, it was an awakening, a new day, praise the lord! [J Christopher] “Chris” Smith is a good lawyer in his own way …Sadow needed Chris to be able to throw the prosecutions case into the gutter. …BUT! Sadow, he was this lawyer from Georgia who changed the whole case for Howard K. Stern. …. …When you hear the testimony from the Bahamas, HKS was the original demon seed…

Ah but in the end it was the “Sadow,” …Poor Rene must feel like a tap dancer with no taps, a puppeteer with no puppets, an actor with no show, a photographer with no camera…..ok I’ll stop.

And how about this, Anna Nicole Smith’s mother, [Virgie Arthur], has to sit there in that court and listen to what adds up to nothing but “hog wash,” …

Be sure to go to Desperate Exes.com to read the rest of John J. Nazarian’s coverage of the trial of Howard K. Stern, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor.

http://desperateexes.com/2010/09/01/steve-sadow-a-real-discovery/

©John J. Nazarian
September 2, 2010
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Beverly Hills, Bradley Brunon Esq., Celebrity Trials, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Deputy District Attorney Renee Rose, Desperateexes.com, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Garofalo Esq., Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Geraldo, Geraldo At Large, Geraldo Rivera, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Horizons, Horizons in the Bahamas, Howard K Stern, J. Chris Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., L. A D. A. Renee Rose, Renee Rose, Steve Sadow Esq., The Bahamas, Virgie Arthur

LATEST FILINGS IN TEXAS ON VIRGIE ARTHUR VS. HOWARD K. STERN, TMZ.COM, LARRY BIRKHEAD, HARVEY LEVIN, ART HARRIS ET AL.

I have not had time to read these because of the hundreds if not thousands of pages filed by Virgie Arthur regarding two days of my deposition last night. The two depositions are in the forums for members as I go through the corrections and exhibits to see what might need to be redacted. Those supplemental filings late yesterday will be going up here part today and the rest tomorrow.

July 30, 2010 Art Harris Second Motion to Compel documents from Virgie Arthur, this is set for submission only for Monday August 16, 2010 at 8:00 AM.

July 30, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit A filed with Harris’ Second Motion to Compel documents from Virgie Arthur, this is set for submission only for Monday August 16, 2010 at 8:00 AM.

July 30, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit B filed with Harris’ Second Motion to Compel documents from Virgie Arthur, this is set for submission only for Monday August 16, 2010 at 8:00 AM.

July 30, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit C filed with Harris’ Second Motion to Compel documents from Virgie Arthur, this is set for submission only for Monday August 16, 2010 at 8:00 AM.

July 30, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit D filed with Harris’ Second Motion to Compel documents from Virgie Arthur, this is set for submission only for Monday August 16, 2010 at 8:00 AM.

July 30, 2010 Art Harris Notice of Submission of Harris’ Second Motion to Compel documents from Virgie Arthur, this is set for submission only for Monday August 16, 2010 at 8:00 AM.

July 30, 2010 Affidavit of Neil McCabe authenticating the supplemental documents filed with the Court on Friday July 30.

July 30, 2010 Day one of Rose Turner’s redacted deposition taken on April 2, 2010.

July 30, 2010 Reporter Certification of day one of Turner’s redacted deposition taken on April 2, 2010.

July 30 2010 Exhibit 002 filed as an exhibit to Turner’s April 2, 2010 deposition.

July 30, 2010 Exhibit 003 filed as an exhibit to Turner’s April 2, 2010 deposition.

July 30, 2010 Exhibit 004 filed as an exhibit to Turner’s April 2, 2010 deposition.

July 30, 2010 Exhibit 005 filed as an exhibit to Turner’s April 2, 2010 deposition.

July 30, 2010 Day four of Rose Turner’s deposition taken on May 12, 2010.

July 30 2010 Exhibit 36 filed as an exhibit to Turner’s May 12, 2010 deposition.

July 30 2010 Exhibit 37 filed as an exhibit to Turner’s May 12, 2010 deposition.

July 30 2010 Exhibit P 3b filed as an exhibit to Turner’s May 12, 2010 deposition.

July 30 2010 Copy of Virgie Arthur’s Memorandum of Law filed earlier in Arthur’s Response in Opposition of the Special Appearance of Bonnie Stern and Art Harris.

July 30 2010 Copy of Virgie Arthur’s Opposition of the Special Appearance of Bonnie Stern and Art Harris.

July 30 2010 Copy of Virgie Arthur’s Opposition of the Special Appearance of Howard K. Stern.

July 30 2010 Copy of Chrystal Baker’s Sworn Statement from 2008

This is everything filed by Virgie Arthur on July 30, 2010 EXCEPT for the hundreds if not thousands of emails between other defendants and me. There is also two parts of the filing that I do not have copies of today.

I will be moving some links and discussions from the previous article to here that relates to Judge Perry’s latest rulings as well as the new non-charged co-conspirators of Anna Nicole Smith and Bonnie Stern. I will include my thoughts on the recent rulings later today.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
July 31, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Don Clark, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, L. Lin Wood, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Neil McCabe, Rose Turner, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Virgie Arthur

I wandered over to Desperate Exes.com today to see if John J. Nazarian had part 3 up on his critique of the trip to Europe, he usually gives us a head’s up if one is coming out but with the trip and all I figured I would just check it out.

Yeppers there is part 3 up and we will bring you all a lead in to that tomorrow.

HOWEVER, what caught my attention right off was that John’s long time friend, Julie, has put up a picture and all it said was “Happy Birthday John and Christian” dated July 9th.

Shes does GREAT graphics for John’s site Desperate Exes.com so we “borrow/swipe” them occasionally to go with a lead in story here on Rose Speaks.com and to date she has never been miffed about that.

Speaking of Julie being miffed, today as a Birthday wish, I am going to share some of the journey of John J. Nazarian and Rose Speaks.com.

I became aware of John J. Nazarian on March 31, 2007 when Rivera Geraldo’s brother, Craig, waylaid him outside a restaurant to try to get a statement about one of his clients. My thought was this is a tough guy you would not want to meet as an enemy in a dark alley. Later that fall of 2007 John did a couple of posts on the old Rose Speaks.com site and of course Rita Cosby put his email out there for the world in her book on Anna Nicole Smith, Howard K. Stern and Larry Birkhead, but this is NOT about any of that.

I found that John was going to cover the Anthony Pellicano trial, how great I thought a PI covering a defrocked Hollywood Royal PI’s in federal a wire tapping trial. So I approached John via email and that led to me “dealing” with Julie. I found she can tough when it comes to John. I had to do a major presentation, show the numbers Rose Speaks.com got per month, promise how the lead in to John’s article would be done etc. I really was scared of this very tough woman. However if you treat her John right, you are in like glue with her. She became delightful to work with. During the trial one of our guest writers, Sprocket, wrote on her blog about seeing John during the Pellicano trial and mentioned that John was a celebrity in his own right in Hollywood. WOW new information on this guy.

John did cover the Pellicano trial and from there a somewhat email relationship began between John and me. John did several articles and always graciously allowed Rose Speaks.com to ride on his fame and do a lead in and the numbers just went up and the readers it brought in was a whole different crowd then the Anna Nicole Smith articles and papers brought in. These people read and did not post but as I told John and Julie at the end of the day it is about page reads that a blog lives or dies from, not the number of posts.

Then came Hurricane Ike and during that time the loss of our beloved black lab, CJ, and I was distraught beyond words, sobbing with Ken and I huddled like any pet owners that lost their “child”. I sent a simple mass email out that told of our loss and asked that no one call us for the next couple of days to allow us to grieve privately (and because I did not want anyone to know how hard the loss had been for us). About thirty minutes later the phone rang and I was annoyed but picked it up, life and articles for the blog goes on I thought. NOT so, John said simply; “Rose we are going to sit here together and cry together over CJ and share the memories we both have of pets that we loved and lost”; and that is what we did for an hour. John won my heart that day; a $400 an hour PI to the rich and famous gave me an hour and showed me a human none PI side of a fellow pet lover/owner.

That was in August or September 2008, my birthday came in October and John sent me an email and said; “I am not trying to interfere or step on your toes, and I know CJ can never be replaced, but if you want another lab, save one from a shelter or puppy mill and I will pay for it, not as a payment for the writings you helped with lead in articles but as friends with the one condition that no one ever knows about this.” I think John said that because he does not like for his kind side to be exploited or he can’t lose that tough and rough PI image. He ended with, “Hell get two if you want them, keep me posted and take your time”. We found Duke and Thor at a puppy mill, heartbreaking and told John; Duke and Thor promptly came home with us. John asked about them, we sent pictures and kept our word and the world never knew of this side of John, it would not mess up his tough guy Hollywood image or allow anyone to know about this loving gift from a fellow “pet” parent.

Then came the deposition and some stupid did not know shit forum poster on that “T” site had spun a story that the Stern family paid us off with these two darling babies. I called John and told him this might come up in the deposition and what I had read from witness statements. John said; “Well F— (I think you know the words he would have used), tell them the truth Rose at the deposition”. So I told them the truth even before the deposition date and told them that the witness statement they had was not going to stand up under scrutiny with emails from this forum poster or even from phone calls between this “poster” and me. In other words their witness had no credibility and it would be easy to prove.

So today on John and Chris’ birthday we offer them our heartfelt congratulations, Chris is a great son and I have been lucky enough to talk to both of John’s sons at times. Chris had to walk his dad through what a Jpeg was from a digital camera and Chris is the one that emailed us the pictures of John by his limousine covering the Pellicano Trial we asked for. I could tell from the tone I heard between Chris and his dad, John, the love that abounded in their home and the ability to kid his dad, and John loving every second of it.

John is rough and tough and a mighty adversary when it comes to his representation of his clent, but if you are lucky enough to get a look beyond that, he has a gentle giant side when his heart is touched.

Happy Birthday John and Chris, from our home to your home and thank you so much for what you have given to both Rose Speaks.com and to us personally.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
July 10, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anthony Pellicano, Anthony Pellicano trial, Black Labrador, Celebrity Trials, Chris Nazarian, Christian Nazarian, Craig Gerado, Desperateexes.com, digital camera, Duke an Thor, Geraldo At Large, High Profile Trials, Hollywood Celebs, Hollywood image, Hurricane Ike, John and Chris’ birthday, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian Birthday, John J. Nazarian P. I., loving gift, mighty adversary, Mike Nazarian, pet parent, puppy mill, Rita Cosby, Rivera Geraldo, rough tough P. I., tough guy, Yellow Labradors

As the California Criminal Trial of Howard K. Stern, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor and Khristine Eroshevich looms for August 4, 2010, the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith tightens the noose on four major witnesses.

You have to wonder if this will affect the credibility of Ford Shelley, G. Ben Thompson, Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson as well as attorney Susan Brown. It also appears that Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers III for the South Carolina Federal Court decided to issue this Order without need of a Hearing.

On July 1, 2010 the Court in South Carolina issued an Court Order allowing the addition of Gaither Thompson II, Gina Shelley, Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia. The new defendants have twenty one (21) days to answer the Amended First Complaint so don’t look for this to go to trial before the criminal charges in California is tried to conclusion.

HERE ARE THE HIGH POINTS I FOUND IN THE COURT’S SEVEN (7) PAGE ORDER

“Plaintiff asserts causes of action for conversion, wrongful taking of estate property in violation of California Probate Code § 850, et seq., statutory and common law commercial appropriation of right of publicity in violation of California Civil Code § 3344.1, unjust enrichment/restitution, unfair competition in violation of California Business & Professional Code § 17200, et seq., violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5) and civil conspiracy.

That the Estate’s property has been distributed to other entities including Geraldo Rivera with Fox News, the O’Quinn Law Firm, former television journalist Rita Cosby, and the California Department of Justice.

Counsel for Ford has consented to the filing of the proposed Amended Complaint. See Email from MacDonald to Lantta dated October 28, 2009. Thompson has not filed a Response in opposition the motion. The only opposition comes from proposed new Defendants Brown and the Law Firm. 1 Brown argues that allowing the amendments would be prejudicial to her and would be futile as to the claims against her. Brown does not appear to oppose the addition of Gaither, Melanie and Gina as Defendants in this action or to the addition of factual allegations regarding Ford’s distribution of Estate property to other third-parties.

[Brown] argues that she would be prejudiced due to the fact that she has not had the opportunity to participate in discovery as a party. However, in his Response, Plaintiff asserts that he is not opposed to amending the deadlines in this case to allow Brown to conduct discovery.

Brown argues that, as former counsel in this case, she is immune from the claims Plaintiff seeks to allege. Generally, an attorney is immune from liability to third persons arising from the performance of his or her professional activities as an attorney on behalf of and with the knowledge of his or her client. See Hunt v. Mortgage Electronic Registration, 522 F. Supp.2d 749, 758 (D.S.C. 2007). However, both Thompson and Ford testify that they did not authorize her to distribute Estate property to the O’Quinn Law. Firm.

The Clerk of Court is directed to file the Amended Complaint, which is attached as an exhibit to Plaintiff’s Motion. Plaintiff must serve the Amended Complaint within 15 days of the date of this Order. Defendants must respond in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Ok after reading the First Amended Complaint I see this is the same exhibit filed with the Court in September 2009, so nothing new here; just has not read it in almost a year.

FILINGS ON JULY 1, 2010 WITH THE SOUTH CAROLINA COURT.

July 1, 2010 Court Order allowing the First Amended Complaint to include Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

July 1, 2010 First Amended Complaint filed by the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith adding Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

July 1 2010 Exhibit A filed with First Amended Complaint by he Estate of Anna Nicole Smith adding Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

July 1 2010 Exhibit B filed with First Amended Complaint by he Estate of Anna Nicole Smith adding Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

July 1 2010 Exhibit C filed with First Amended Complaint by he Estate of Anna Nicole Smith adding Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

July 1 2010 Exhibit D filed with First Amended Complaint by he Estate of Anna Nicole Smith adding Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

July 1 2010 Exhibit E filed with First Amended Complaint by he Estate of Anna Nicole Smith adding Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

July 1 2010 Exhibit F filed with First Amended Complaint by he Estate of Anna Nicole Smith adding Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

July 1 2010 Exhibit G filed with First Amended Complaint by he Estate of Anna Nicole Smith adding Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

July 1 2010 Exhibit H filed with First Amended Complaint by he Estate of Anna Nicole Smith adding Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

July 1 2010 Exhibit I filed with First Amended Complaint by he Estate of Anna Nicole Smith adding Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson and the attorney Susan Brown and her Law Firm in Atlanta Georgia

Summons to Serve on Gina Thompson Shelley, Gaither Ben Thompson II and Melodie Thompson

Summons to Serve on Susan M. Brown and the Law Offices of Susan M. Brown

LATEST FILING IN THE TEXAS CASE I have not had time to read any of these papers.

July 7, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Response to Art Harris Motion to Compel Production.

July 7, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Exhibit A filed with Response to Art Harris Motion to Compel Production.

July 7, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Exhibit B filed with Response to Art Harris Motion to Compel Production.

July 7, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Exhibit C filed with Response to Art Harris Motion to Compel Production.

July 7, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Exhibit D filed with Response to Art Harris Motion to Compel Production.

NEWEST FILINGS IN THE VIRGIE ARTHUR VS. HOWARD K. STERN BREACH OF CONTRACT.

July 1, 2010, Howard K. Stern’s Special Appearance to Object to personal jurisdiction.

July 1, 2010 Stern’s Exhibit A filed with Stern’s Special Appearance to Object to personal jurisdiction.

For now we are NOT going to buy these papers due to cost, if it gets traction after the beginning of the Criminal trial or the August 6, 2010 hearing on Stern’s Special Appearance, then we will begin to purchase these papers as well.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
July 6, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith's Estate, Anna Nicole Smith's Will, Art Harris, Attorney General Jerry Brown, attorney-client privilege, Bahamian lawyer Tracy Ferguson, Beverly Hills, Birkhead, BKD LLP, BKD LLP Computer forensics, Bonnie Stern, Bryan Cave LLP, California AG Jerry Brown, California Business & Professional Code § 17200, California Civil Code § 3344.1, California Department of Justice, California Probate Code § 850, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, civil conspiracy, commercial appropriation, commercial appropriation of right of publicity, Computer forensic expert, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5), conversion of Estate Property, crime-fraud exception, crime-fraud exception attorney-client privilege, Dannielynn, Danny Santiago, Debra Opri Esq., Don Clark, Dr. Kapoor, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Elisa Miller Esq., Elizabeth McNamara Esq., Florence South Carolina, Folkens Law Firm, Ford Shelley, FOX News, G Ben Thompson, Gaither Ben Thompson II, Geraldo - Live, Geraldo At Large, Geraldo FOX News, Geraldo Rivera, Gina Shelley, Gina Thompson Shelley, Greta -On The Record, Greta Van Susteren, Gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown, Hachette Book Group USA, Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood California, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Horizons in the Bahamas, Horizons law suit, Horry County, Horry County Sheriff, Horry County Sheriff's Department, Horry County South Carolina, Howard K Stern, Joseph C Wilson IV Esq., Karl Alan Folkens Esq., L. Lin Wood, Law Offices of Susan Brown Esq., Lin Wood, Liz McNamara Esq., Louis David Nettles Esq., Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers III, Melodie Thompson, Myrtle Beach, Myrtle Beach south Carolina, Neil McCabe, Nicole Jennings Wade Esq., Pierce Herns Sloan and McLeod, right of publicity, right of publicity in violation of California Civil Code, Robert Klein Esq., Rose Turner, Seminole Tribe Authorities, Shane Gibson, Shane Gibson former Bahamian Minister of Immigration, South Carolina Federal Court, statutory and common law, Steve Sadow Esq., Susan M. Brown Esq., Susan P MacDonald Esq., The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ.com, Tom Pirtle Esq., Tracy Ferguson Esq., Tracy Ferguson of Callendar's Bahamas, unfair competition, unfair competition in violation of California Business & Professional, unjust enrichment/restitution, violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Virgie Arthur, wrongful taking of estate property

Who does the brown hair belong too or as one of our moderators said “Someone got some splaining to do”.

What the Orange County crime scene investigators and the FBI needs is to match is Caucasian head hair, dark brown, fine 5″ long.

In a case that the D.A. office has released ten of thousand of pages a month in a public trial of Casey Anthony, why do they fight to release some of the information to Anthony’s defense team?

The FBI released it to the Casey Anthony defense team ONLY upon request and then not until April 5, 2010.

Report requested on March 17, 2009 from Linda Kenney Baden Esq. file material from the Trace Evidence Unit. This material includes bench notes, computer printouts, and other specific information regarding the case.

The Sheriff’s department submitted seven crime scene investigators hair samples on three different days, under names on two dates and just by numbers on another dates.

The additional hair and other specimens were received on November 25, 2009, December 8, 2009 and December 9, 2009.

The following specimens were submitted under cover of communication dated November 24, 2009 and examined in the Trace Evidence Unit (Hair and Fiber).

Seven crime scene investigators (extensive hair samples)
A Shop Vac Vacuum (Anthony home)
2 Steam Cleaners (Anthony home)
A vacuum cleaner (Anthony home)
And a plastic bag. (Anthony home)

On November 30, 2009 examined by the Trace Unit (Hair and Fiber) Items resubmitted for testing: TEU secondary evidence.

This report states it supplements FBI laboratory reports dated August 1, 2008, August 6, 2008, August 13, 2008, September 12, 2008, October 6, 2008, October 15, 2008, October 21, 2008, November 6, 2008, December 19, 2008, January 27, 2009 and June 25, 2009.

Human hairs with characteristics of apparent decomposition; however, none were found.

The previously reported Caucasian head hair found on specimen is microscopically dissimilar to the head hairs compromising the seven crime scene investigators and it matched none of them.

Crime scene investigators originally found the 5″ of hair and eliminated the seven crime scene investigators Scene was processed on Dec. 11 through Dec. 20. The hair sample was submitted to the FBI on Dec. 13, 2008.

Then there is the canvas laundry bag similar to the one that Caylee Anthony’s remains were in; well the finger prints on that excluded Casey Anthony, George Anthony, Cynthia M. Anthony and Lee A. Anthony. So the fingerprints do not belong to anyone in the Anthony family.

The hair does not belong to Caylee Anthony, Casey Anthony, George Anthony, Cynthia M. Anthony or Lee Anthony. Now they have eliminated all of the crime scene investigators, so who does the hair belong too?

Remember that very important piece of duct tape? The one that was so important to compare hair samples and fingerprints too? Well somewhere between the Orange County Sheriff’s Office crime scene investigators and by the time the FBI had completed the examination that piece of duct tape had been contaminated and so it shows nothing that can be introduced, how convenient is that?

Then you have the reports of Texas Equu Search, stating that on August 28, 2008 and the first part of September 2008 that because of a tropical storm the water where the remains were found was at least waist high to they did not search that area while in Florida.

However, Roy Kronk saw the bag with something white (like a skull) on two days in the middle of August 2008 and after all of that flooding went back on a “hunch” and found the remains on December 11, 2008, so why had the bag not floated a tad with the current of the water? Has Kronk given a sample of his 5” brown hair to be excluded? I am not saying Roy Kronk killed or put Caylee’s body there, I do feel like something with Kronk smells fishy.

This is the danger when cases are tried in the public media of the infotainment world on Nancy Grace, Geraldo and Greta Van Susteren, Fox and Headline News Infotainment.

Can Casey Anthony get a fair trial anywhere in Florida or for that matter in the United States?

I will be adding links of other papers released today added to this article but the hair analysis jumped out at me and I wanted to get this up first.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
May 10, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: 2 Steam Cleaners, a plastic bag, A Shop Vac Vacuum, A vacuum cleaner, Anthony home Search Warrant, canvas laundry bag, Casey Anthony, Caylee Anthony, Cindy Anthony, Crime Scene Investigators, duct tape, FBI Labs, FBI Trace Evidence Unit, finger prints, fingerprints, Fox Infotainment, George Anthony, Geraldo - Live, Geraldo FOX News, Geraldo Rivera, Greta -On The Record, Greta Van Susteren, Hair and Fiber Evidence, Headline News, High Profile Trials, Infotainment, Infotainment Media, Jose Baez Esq., Lee Anthony, Linda Kenney Baden Esq., Nancy Grace, Orange County Florida, Orange County Sherriff's Department, Roy Krunk, Search Warrant, seven crime scene investigators, TexasEquu Search, Tim Miller, Trace Evidence Unit