Archive for the “Dannielynn Hope Birkhead” Category

Anna Nicole Smith’s daughter

Anna Nicole and Daniel Wayne Smith

Well talk about “the other shoe dropping,” it did for a few people this morning. I am sure that anything to do with the “Supremes” will never be a favorite group for those left behind in the Anna Nicole Smith saga, for that matter they may never mention “Supreme” anything. The cascading and never-ending grief that surrounded Anna Nicole Smith just continued today when the U.S. Supreme Court made it clear, “Get a Job.” There will be no millions and millions and for that matter there will be Zilch, Nada and all those legal fees..ouch! The dreams of all those “Benjamins” stacked neatly in big piles and personal bankers have all turned into nightmares, just like the lives of many involved in the Anna Nicole Smith Saga.

It is my belief that had Anna Nicole Smith lived, life would have been better for some and just awful for one or two. The “Master Plan” would have been in effect and she and her constant companion would have lived happily ever after raising “their child.” Perhaps I think that the U. S. Supreme Court Decision on Anna Nicole Smith Estate (231); U.S. Supreme Court would have maybe been a little more generous had Anna been around. What “The Supremes” thought of this case and the “players” was addressed by Justice Roberts. The comment by Justice Roberts in quoting Charles Dickens novel “Bleak House“ spoke volumes with what he was thinking in reference to this entire matter, again, my opinion.

Someone told me that they thought that they heard someone yell, “Oh my god stop decorating,” we are not sure in what context that was heard, but funny right? All those millions would have been a pain in the ass for someone to have to handle, just terrible. And the lifestyle, Big Houses, Big Pools, Big Lawns, Big Staffs, Big Security, Fancy Cars, First Class travel, Wonderful Fancy Hotels the “Life of Riley.” Who the hell would want such a thing to have to wake up to every morning, knowing that all you had to do was have fun with your kids. And spend money taking “care” of all their little needs each and every one of them. Looking at what money and fame has brought to the life of Anna Nicole Smith, maybe the simple life will be the trick and one of joy and love. Frankly, what the hell, seems like there is not much of a choice at this point…

Visit Desperate Exes.com to read all of John J. Nazarian’s thoughts on all things of the rich and/or famous.

http://desperateexes.com/2011/06/24/supremes-sing-finale-of-anna-nicoles-saga/

NOTE FROM ROSE TURNER: This is the last article this site will do on Anna Nicole Smith, as one of our members said to me, life has moved on and so has all of us.

Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.

©John J. Nazarian
June 26, 2011
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 33 Comments »

Bonnie Stern in Las Vegas

< We learned yesterday that in the Anna Nicole Smith conspiracy to give drugs to a known addict case that Bonnie Stern testified for the prosecution about her brother Howard K. Stern. You think a prosecution witness would be for the prosecution however that is not the case with Bonnie Stern.

In what must have been a powerful moment in court, Steve Sadow, Howard K. Stern’s attorney had Bonnie Stern described her brother’s love for Anna Nicole Smith by asking “Did you believe your brother was in love with Anna Nicole Smith?” Bonnie Stern’s answer was; “”She was his everything,” I only wish I would meet someone that loved me as much as he loved her.”

Stern’s sister did authenticate and identified emails that Deputy Attorney Renee Rose had stated on August 6, 2010 was the only way to get these emails on the record with the taking the position that Bonnie Stern and Anna Nicole Smith were uncharged conspirators. It appears from the AP report of LINDA DEUTSCH that there were in fact several emails between Anna Nicole Smith and Bonnie Stern where Smith was requesting “the shipments”. Stern’s sister, Bonnie, did not deny the emails but said she couldn’t remember having the items sent to Smith or her brother, Howard K. Stern.

The AP reported, in one e-mail, she wrote she “gave Chris everything” from a doctor in Beverly Hills to bring to Smith. She acknowledged the reference was to defendant Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, but said she didn’t remember giving the doctor anything

We have to wonder if Dr. Levy was a common doctor used by both Stern’s sister, Bonnie and Anna Nicole Smith. If he is since he is on the prosecution list will his records reflect Bonnie Stern picking up multiple prescriptions for shipment to The Bahamas for Smith. Did Dr. Levy make a deal with the prosecution so as not to be sitting where the other two doctors are today at the defense table?

The AP also said that the e-mails admitted into evidence revealed tensions between Smith and Howard K. Stern. They said in part; “I hurt so much and it seems Howard don’t care,” Smith wrote. “I’m so angry all the time, so sad and mad what can I do. I don’t want baby Lynn to see me so upset. I feel that Howard hates me. All he does is raise his voice and back talk me.” This email was written in late 2006 after Daniel Smith’s death while visiting his mother and new baby sister, Dannielynn. I would bet there has to be more than just this one email and my take is that this was part of the normal grieving process, nothing more unless the prosecution produces other documents and witnesses who say the same thing at different times then this one email.

Anna Nicole Smith expressed in another email to Bonnie Stern that; “She, [Smith], said she felt a need to get away from the Bahamas but couldn’t leave “because of our situation.”

Larry Birkhead testified after Bonnie Stern stating that Anna had many prescriptions around the house and that he felt Howard K. Stern had tried to interfere with his relationship with Smith and even admonished him once when Birkhead hid Methadone from Smith out of worry of the amount of prescriptions in the home and the amounts Smith was taking.

Birkhead returns to the stand today to complete his testimony, what is the bet that Sadow will be able to turn Birkhead’s testimony into that Anna Nicole Smith was However K. Stern’s “everything” and will Birkhead also paint a picture of love between Smith and Stern during the two years he lived off and on with Smith. In a TMZ.com article today the headline says in part; “Do You Swear to Tell the Truth…? That article is already being picked up by sites like Fox News.

Virgie Arthur sat in the courtroom for both Bonnie Stern’s and now Larry Birkhead’s testimony.

My prediction is that even though the Deputy Attorney Renee Rose continues with her building blocks to make her case, is that Stern is going to be found not guilty. As I continue to say, if we convicted and put every enabler in jail there would not be enough room. The love that Howard K. Stern had for Anna Nicole Smith is as predicted by Sadow being attested to by even prosecution witnesses.

LATEST FILING IN S. C. CASE OF THE ESTATE OF ANNA NICOLE SMITH VS, SHELLEY, THOMPSON AND BROWN

August 20, 2010 Estate of Anna Nicole Smith Response to Susan M. Brown’s Motion to Dismiss.

LATEST FILING IN THE TEXAS HARRIS COUNTY CASE

. August 20, 2010 Virgie Arthur Amended Notice for Submission changing the date to September 6, 2010.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

Please also note the additional sentence in the disclaimer of articles that state; “If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.” This will be enforced since different subjects and trials we cover bring in different readers.

©Rose Turner
August 20, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 76 Comments »

Rose Speaks

I am not putting up Art Harris Filing the First Court of Appeals Decision to the Supreme Court of Texas as it is the same as what was sent to Judge Weiman of the 80th Harris County District Court.

TERESA STEPHENS FILING IN TARRANT COUNTY FEDERAL COURT

March 1, 2010 Stephens Motion for Relief from Judgment and reopen case or file an Appeal.

March 1, 2010 Stephens Brief in Support of Relief from Judgment and reopen case or file an Appeal.

March 22, 2010 CNN and Time Warner Response to Stephens Motion from Relief from Judgment and reopen case or file an Appeal.

April 8, 2010 Order Denying Motion for Relief and Appointment of counsel for Stephens.

TERESA STEPHENS FILING IN TARRANT COUNTY DISTRICT COURT

April 13, 2010 Stephens Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal.

April 16, 2010 O’Dell’s Response to Stephens Motion for Continuance.

April 16, 2010 O’Dell’s Motion Compel and Sanctions for Stephens and Glenn.

April 19, 2010 Vice Response to Stephens Motion to Vacate Dismissal.

April 19, 2010 Vice Exhibit 1 Response to Stephens Motion to Vacate Dismissal.

April 19, 2010 Vice Exhibit 2 Response to Stephens Motion to Vacate Dismissal.

April 19, 2010 Vice Exhibit 3 Response to Stephens Motion to Vacate Dismissal.

April 19, 2010 Vice Exhibit 4 Response to Stephens Motion to Vacate Dismissal.

April 19, 2010 Vice Exhibit 5 Response to Stephens Motion to Vacate Dismissal.

April 19, 2010 Vice Exhibit 6 Response to Stephens Motion to Vacate Dismissal.

NEWEST FILINGS HARRIS COUNTY VIRGIE ARTHUR VS. HOWARD K. STERN

April 28, 2010 Art Harris Response to Virgie Arthur Motion to Compel Discovery.

April 28, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit C Response to Virgie Arthur Motion to Compel Discovery.

April 28, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit D Response to Virgie Arthur Motion to Compel Discovery.

April 28, 2010 Virgie Arthur Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Declaration Neil McCabe Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Virgie Arthur Affidavit Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit B Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit C Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit D Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit E Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit F Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit G Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit H Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit I Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit J Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit K Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit L Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit M Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit N Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit O Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit P Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit Q Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit R Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit S Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit T Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit U Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

April 28, 2010 Arthur Exhibit V Response to TMZ – Harvey Levin Summary Judgment.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 101 Comments »

The Paparazzi

The latest potential train wrecks, Da Kardashians — Kim and her BIG sister Kourtney — were exiting a car when some poor photographer got very close, it is being reported. And Kim and BIG sis Kourtney’s security thugs took care of business. What does that mean? Just because the guy has a camera does not make him a “threat,“ as a matter of fact is it not these very same people who made these nobodies somebodies?

The members of our security details are off-duty police and sheriff deputies and above all gentlemen. You can still have “security” and not get sued or arrested, it is called having trained people in place and COMMON SENSE. During the Phil Spectre circus we saw his “security“ team and being that he was so rich it would appear that he had paid by the pound for the two cows in very large suits that accompanied him and his wife to and from the court.

…For Nazarian and Associates, we don’t hire people by how many pounds they weigh but for what they have between their ears: brains. …

And how about this, you don’t want the attention, don’t leak your schedule to the paparazzi and chances are they won’t be there. Ahhhh, that would be too disappointing, no one to take your picture and document how surprised you look. OH NO, but then TMZ would not have you to make comments about on there site. There are dozens of ways to keep from being confronted by the photogs. A perfect example is when Adam Braun and I accompanied a client to be booked for the Anna Nicole [Smith] debacle…there was no photo of her entering the police station, and no photo of her leaving. Also keep in mind that I planned the entire event and the best part NO MUG SHOT! We don’t want to be sued and we don’t want to attack the very people who make us famous, THE PAPARAZZI, these men and women provide a service. For sure there are times when you wish they were not parked in front of your house or apartment. How about this, send for coffee and sandwiches for them while they are camped out and maybe they will give you a break. We use other less pleasant tactics but they are harmless…who can predict a broken hose or sprinklers going off by accident?

When a real threat is in place, get out of the area quickly and use the appropriate force to do that. Having trained professionals will do the trick and you don’t get that for 50 bucks an hour. But if you hire meat to beat people and smack them around and break their cameras, you’ll PAY FOR IT in bail, lawyers and settlements.

Visit Desperate Exes.com not for just this article but an article about Victoria Duffy Hopper and Dennis Hopper’s Divorce and Judge Amy Pellman vintage always in the best interest of the children.

http://desperateexes.com/2010/04/06/leave-the-poor-paps-alone-ks/.

©John J. Nazarian
April 7, 2010
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 8 Comments »

Rose Speaks

It has been brought to my attention that a blogger on another site that I have great respect for is under a misconception of the Texas State Statutes. Yes I know most of you think we should leave the U. S. and it would be good riddance, However do not judge all of us on sound bites made to make us look like ignorant yokels. My deposition is not over until every party’s counsel gets to ask me every question they want to. Lawyers have jobs, it is not normally personal with them it is what they do for a living. Their ethics require them to be the fiercest advocate for their respective clients, and that is why the lawyers in this case are some of the best in the nation and make those mega bucks.

Texas Statute governing Depositions versus Federal Statues. As we always encourage each of you that read at Rose Speaks.com, let Google be your friend.

A Sworn statement cannot be used at trial in Texas a deposition can be used in Texas in trial.

For use at trial, all parties need a deposition, not a sworn statement. Sworn statements and affidavits are useful for some purposes, such as to support or defeat a special appearance or a motion for summary judgment, but they are not admissible at trial. A deposition is admissible at trial in a civil case.

Here are the statutes governing deposition versus a witness or a party that is not available for trial.

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE

As amended through January 1, 2007

Rule 801. Definitions

The following definitions apply under this article:

(a) Statement. A “statement” is (1) an oral or written verbal expression or (2) nonverbal conduct of a person, if it is intended by the person as a substitute for verbal expression.

(b) Declarant. A “declarant” is a person who makes a statement.

(c) Matter Asserted. “Matter asserted” includes any matter explicitly asserted, and any matter implied by a statement, if the probative value of the statement as offered flows from declarant’s belief as to the matter.

…(3) Depositions. In a civil case, it is a deposition taken in the same proceeding, as same proceeding is defined in Rule of Civil Procedure 207. Unavailability of deponent is not a requirement for admissibility.

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

As amended through December 1, 2009

Rule 804.

(a) Definition of unavailability. “Unavailability as a witness” includes situations in which the declarant- ….

…(4) is unable to be present or to testify at the hearing because of death or then existing physical or mental illness or infirmity; ….

…(1) Former testimony. Testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a deposition taken in compliance with law in the course of the same or another proceeding, if the party against whom the testimony is now offered, or, in a civil action or proceeding, a predecessor in interest, had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination.

With that said, I will share only a tad of my answers today during the fist session of my deposition.

1. It was videotape for the Court and/or jury trial in fact the lawyers continued to say “Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury”, I asked why since there was no jury there today and learned something new about why attorneys say that in Texas if not in every state.

2. I have consistently maintained that I believe that Howard K. Stern got a raw deal in Florida, and I continue to repeat that as I did several times today.

3. I had no reason to believe that Stern has not been honest, forthcoming and sincere in all of the discovery in this or any other case I know about.

4. As I said today and made it clear I would continue to say even on my death bed, there is no defamation and no conspiracy to defame.

With that said, some of the defendants do not have clean hands, and some of them have made this very difficult in both money and time because they have not been forthcoming in my opinion.

AGAIN LET ME SAY I AM NO ONE’S STAR WITNESS, I AM NOT ON ANYONE’S SIDE IN THIS. As a matter of law the court did find I had colluded with Virgie Arthur’s counsel which is not illegal in Texas and so stated during it’s July or August Written Order, HOWEVER THAT SAID there is also no doubt in my mind that CBS’ attorneys did collude with Art Harris in order to piggy back off of him to come into the case early. AGAIN IN MY OPINION THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. The Court of Appeals in Texas in the Flack decision also stated that a defendant can be settling with nothing nefarious going on between the parties.

I did lean today from one of my co-defendants attorney that any of the defendants can file to keep me in this case, although the attorney who shared that with me indicated they would not be going in that direction, I did need to be aware of that.

I have NOW posted my Settlement Agreement with Ms. Arthur in the members only forum section. I have done this because although I have the right to keep that private from the public and the members of this site, I have insisted that it be made public for all to see, because I have always said I will be transparent. I will also ask when it is appropriate based on some of the information deemed confidential and/or covered by the Agreed Protective Order that a transcript of my deposition also be released to the public for all to read.

PLEASE ALSO CHECK THE NOTICE OF THE SERVER WE ARE WITH WILL BE DOING MAINTENANCE OVER TWO NIGHTS THIS WEEKEND.

Ken and I wish all of you a blessed Easter and hope each of you are with those you love.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
April 2, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 60 Comments »

Virgie Arthur February 2007

After being unable to reach an agreed settlement between Virgie Arthur and Teresa Stephens that was agreeable to both parties in the Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern, Larry Birkhead, TMZ et. al. defamation case and conspiracy to defame.

Today, March 31, 2010 Arthur has filed a Notice of Nonsuit in regards to dismissing Teresa Stephens from the Harris County Case

I do not expect any of the conditions of why a settlement was unable to be reached. However if either side does release a statement in regards to Stephens being released from the lawsuit pending in the Harris County 80th District Court by the Honorable Larry Weiman, Rose Speaks.com will attempt to get an on the record comment from both sides.

We here at Rose Speaks.com are glad to see Ms. Stephens, a blogger who lives in Texas, dismissed after almost two years and wish her all of the best.

In other filings with he court filed with the Court after 5 P. M on March 30, 2010, Art Harris has filed a “Conditional Motion to Quash” the deposition of Turner based on three reasons. The deposition is scheduled for Friday April 2, 2010.

Well let the games begin… In a filing full of false information (And God I hate to side against a good law firm), Amanda Bush on behalf of her client filed a Motion to Quash Deposition of Turner based on “At the time of filing this Motion, counsel for Harris has not received a response. On information and belief, counsel for Harris believes that Turner intends to quash the videotaping of her deposition late Thursday, April 1, 2010, and the Court is closed on Friday, April 2, 2010 for the holiday.” I hope this is one damn good witness Ms. Bush has and one with a LOT of money that can fight off perjury charges and a Civil Suit, because that statement is an out and out lie to the Court by an officer of the Court, which last I checked was pretty serious. Shooting back Virgie Arthur filed Turner had NEVER said and DID not intend to file any Motion to Quash. For those lawyers needing a refresher course I had until 5 PM today to file a Motion to Quash and Harris’ counsel knows that. The holiday, Mmmmm every lawyer that intended to be here had confirmed including Ms. Bush’s boss that he would even stay to Saturday to finish all of this up. So to say I did not want to be cross examined by him is bull shit, I asked if there was any way because of my illness if they could trade out time and try for both sides to wrap this up in six hours if not I would continue to do the best I could through Saturday. Folks this is why I am so angry at Harris for deleting those emails and documents, it seems the only person everyone agrees has not is me… I am hoping we can get an emergency hearing tomorrow and proceed. However it might be Harris’ attorneys strategy to stall until I am on pain management medication and can’t give a deposition before the hearing to bust Art Harris on April 30. What does a well respected Law Firm do when a client screws them over and leaves them to clean up the mess. I guess some consolation is that Harris is now in trouble in Florida in the Haleigh Cummings case for the very same situation he finds himself in the soup kettle in Texas. I will have a lot more to say about Harris’ credibility among his peers of independent investigative reporters and where he actually is when “out of town researching a big murder or case”.

LATEST PAPERS FILED IN HARRIS COUNTY COURT

April 1, 2010 Art Harris’ Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Response to Harris’ Motion to Quash.

April 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit A filed with Art Harris’ Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Response to Harris’ Motion to Quash.

April 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit B filed with Art Harris’ Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Response to Harris’ Motion to Quash.

April 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit C filed with Art Harris’ Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Response to Harris’ Motion to Quash.

April 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit D filed with Art Harris’ Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Response to Harris’ Motion to Quash.

April 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit E filed with Art Harris’ Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Response to Harris’ Motion to Quash.

March 31, 2010 Rose Turner’s complete email exchange with Amanda Bush which was not filed by Art Harris.

I have not been sent a copy for some reason, but I have now received some confirmation of available for counsel to attend a video taped deposition of me in HOUSTON TEXAS by Art Harris’ counsel in their offices in Houston as early as April 5, 2010 or April 12, 2010.

April 1, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Supplemental Response to Harris’ Reply on Motion to Quash deposition of Turner.

April 1, 2101 Virgie Arthur Exhibit A filed with Virgie Arthur’s Supplemental Response to Harris’ Reply on Motion to Quash deposition of Turner.

April 1, 2101 Virgie Arthur Exhibit B filed with Virgie Arthur’s Supplemental Response to Harris’ Reply on Motion to Quash deposition of Turner.

April 1, 2101 Virgie Arthur Exhibit C filed with Virgie Arthur’s Supplemental Response to Harris’ Reply on Motion to Quash deposition of Turner.

Folks I have never made it any secret from any of you are the attorneys that I was working diligently with the counsel for Virgie Arthur since last summer to reach a settlement to protect the rights of bloggers on this site to remain anonymous.

There are some papers concerning the Harris County Case up on the private forums for members only and will be put here on the blog as soon as they show up on the Harris County District Court website.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
March 30, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 93 Comments »

Virgie Arthur

Per news and USA Today today the lead in story line is “Poor little Dannielynn Birkhead, 3. And we mean that literally.”

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled today that Anna Nicole Smith’s estate (i.e., Dannielynn, Anna’s daughter) is not entitled to a single penny from Smith’s husband, oil tycoon J. Howard Marshall.

Anna Nicole Smith’s case will not go back to lower court which awarded Anna Nicole Smith $88 million. So another trip to the U. S. Supreme Court? Will the insanity of the lawsuits end now that there is no money to fight over? There is no need for Larry Birkhead and Virgie Arthur to continue to fight over the guardianship of the money everyone hoped would be needed to take care it. Arthur said the money was tainted, now that there is nothing to fight over, will Birkhead allow Arthur to now visit a broke Dannielynn? It is possible for Smith’s Estate can ask for a rehearing, especially since this was a 2-1 vote. They could also take it back to the U. S. Supreme Court. I did contact some of the lawyers for a quote on the record, Virgie Arthur’s lead attorney, Neal McCabe said; “…except to say that we have not been involved in a fight over the so-called “Marshall money,” about which Virgie has not made a claim.”

Howard K. Stern can now be released as the Executor of Smith’s Estate, Larry Birkhead will keep Dannielynn and poor Dannielynn owes a LOT of legal fees the Estate has accumulated. Dannielynn at age 3 has to hope the Estate Property stolen with the money made on those sales will put some money in her bank account.

LATEST FILINGS IN HARRIS COUNTY BY VIRGIE ARTHUR A MOTION TO COMPEL ART HARRIS TO COMPEL WITH DISCOVERY. I HAVE ALSO INCLUDED THE CASE QUOTED SINCE IT IS FROM JUDGE ROSENTHAL THE FEDERAL JUDGE THAT ALL OF THE PARTIES RESPECTED.

Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.

©Rose Turner
March 19, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 35 Comments »

Our weather forecast is from Wordpress Weather

Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith