“Two days to prepare for a final arguments”…it is a wonderful thing that we are not in a country that practices Japanese customs, as in when you are so badly disgraced you just disembowel yourself. Rene Rose is, as far as I am concerned, a very talented prosecutor and could never have imagined having Judge Perry glaring at her in the final weeks of such a high profile (yet boring) criminal case….
“As for the defense pretty much tossing the duck in the air, why not? (feathered pillows) It is beyond obvious that with the group of misfits that the prosecution brought to testify …that this case was very much done, real done, beyond done. In the early days I, too, agreed that Howard K. Stern’s charges were, based on the “cards” showing, innocent. …if you read the discovery and the investigator’s notes, you could see much bigger issues involving the behavior of people close to Anna Nicole Smith…. ……and then with “The Sadow” factor I knew early on things would be good for Howard K. Stern. …It is all going to be good and everyone can get on with their lives and no “tell all”…or will there be? (thank God I took real good notes when I was being offered to work on a “tell all” about the stuff that went on in and around ANS)..
“Prosecutor Rose had one last ditch effort and that was DOJ Investigator Danny Santiago, and Judge Perry kicked all that to the curb. …It was great and I owe S/A Santiago a big thanks, he spelled my name right and I appreciate that!
“… Talk about strange and colorful stories and I have wheel barrels full of them when it comes to this case. How about this? Being that I have been termed “The King of Trash,” Howard and I came up with an idea about a reality show called what else, “Trashed.” Sure, some of it was Howard’s thoughts and some of it was mine…after all it is my life’s story, right? The premise would be, well, maybe another day…it was supposedly pitched to Harvey Levin in the days before……Harvey did not like the idea and in my thoughts the reason is that it would run interference with TMZ…my thoughts.
“I could have sworn I saw Judge Perry in a knife store and he was asking about a “good knife to whittle with… …Madam Prosecutor, your preparation for a closing argument could take maybe 10 minutes. And given the temperament of this bench officer, it could even be less! And by the time Judge Perry stops “whittling,” the only thing on that charging document might be just one name, Rene Rose, Prosecutor.
To read the full article visit Desperate Exes.com to read this one and catch up on the earlier coverage as well.
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.
“Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following.
“We will be listening to all of our readers about new case. Do you have a tip for us on a case for us to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Walking into Judge Perry’s court yesterday, I saw Stephen Sadow questioning Nadine Alexie and doing “the Sadow,” that being asking a question and then glancing at the jury. ….Oh I hear it, “she’s a liar,” “she was paid off,” “it is all for an apartment,” my only thought is this, is she a liar? Is she the only one in that room that could be classified a “liar”…I think not!
…Sadow was focused on the “going into hiding” that Nadine described after being contacted by the media via phone and at her door. On her way to becoming famous. There was mention that Larry King may have called, that would do it for me, “Larry King is on the phone,” go hide. Nadine’s response to that line of questioning seemed real to me, however odd all the “hiding” and game playing and calling it “fear”…hiding from what? And she took her sister, nanny Q, with her, all hiding! Hell, there are people I know that keep in constant contact with “media” to assure that they are around for special times!
Nadine spoke of being let go by Mr. Stern due to Howard K.Stern’s concerns about “leaks,” what leaks it was not clear. However, by this time, it would appear there were many. Funny thing about having “total control” is that it seldom works. It was that “total control” and manipulation that got everyone in this mess.
Look at what I call the Bahamian Master Plan, and how that plan collapsed when Anna Nicole Smith died. At some time that plan will be thought out clearly…don’t get carried away, it was not a plan of mass destruction. It was a plan for a life that would be lived in the Bahamas with their daughter, the good life, away from the annoyances of the states, California in particular! Is there anything wrong with having a plan to rid yourselves of an “annoyance”? Not at all. Keep in mind the way things would have gone had Anna not died.
….There was some discussion as to the money that was promised by the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office and it was somewhere in the arena of $2,000 to $2,500, worked out by her husband, Amol .
…You could see the look of disgust on some of the jurors…it was an uncomfortable feeling and even more uncomfortable thought. …
….Prosecutor Rene Rose wanted to present evidence that was already given to the defense, but with a small change that members of the defense objected to. Judge Perry’s response; “grossly unfair.” Prosecutor Rose once again tried to present the material in a little different way, Judge Perry, “Gross Surprise.” One of the lawyers on the defense stated that some of the pictures were “pornographic.” Judge Perry responds, “Seems late to me Ms. Rose.”
…I cannot remember ever seeing a judge as annoyed with a prosecutor as Judge Perry appears to be with Prosecutor Rene Rose. Most of the time during the day Judge Perry had the appearance of someone in pain, and the fist to his cheek did nothing to change my belief that this bench officer is pissed.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
The only consistent thing about Nanny Q and Nanny N is the inconsistencies. The biggest question I have is who thought bringing the “Ninneys” from the Bahamas? Along those same lines did anyone from the DA’s office go and speak to these two people? Now we have nine people, eating three meals plus a day, nine accommodations, and because they are flight risks (my thoughts) there is security assigned to them 24 hours a day! To assure that they don’t get lost on the way to the airport…do they have escorts also? Cha-ching!!! Once again, Judge Perry had it with these Bahamian shenanigans…
From my personal knowledge and not from any of the stooges, Nanny Q was close factually on some of the issues but again, Judge Perry is not going to allow any “sliders” or “spit balls” in his courtroom. It almost seems to me that the prosecutor knows that what she is asking is “wavy gravy,” but what the hell, ask it! And if one of the three barristers doesn’t catch it or the guy in the black robes misses it, Madam Prosecutor wins… …biggest lucky charm was of course the incredible presence of Steve Sadow, Esq. “The Gentleman from Georgia”…and Judge Perry.
The idea that has to gall the defendants is the costs involved in charging them with what was charged. And what about the costs involved for the defendants, for sure if Kapoor is found not… The type of medicine he practices I am not sure if his patients care what his background is. Eroshevich, she is old and will at least… …Howard, who knows, as I said in the past he is very bright on some issues, others, hmm no so much. Did anyone intentionally kill anyone, I don’t think so. Did Dr. Bubbles and Dr. Fabulous try and do the right thing, I think so, and did Howard love Anna not a question in my mind.
…For a law enforcement authority to charge a group or individual, they must have strong evidence that will stand on its own… …Fine-tuning is one thing, but what I have seen so far in the witnesses and experts, fine-tuning, sure like trying to play a piano that fell 10 floors to crash on the street below. …There will always be those who will “really” want to know what happened in the final hours of Daniel and Anna. And the biggest wild card of all, with this being Los Angeles, is the jury pool….
Read the rest of John J. Nazarian’s take on this trial by visiting Desperate Exes.com
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Just when you think that this trial cannot get any worse what happens? Quethlie Alexie shows up, and for what? The best part of this new mess that prosecutor Renee Rose finds herself in is, Quethlie Alexie and her sidekick Nadine Alexie, her sister in law!!! What, Nazarian Rule 21, subsection 4a, never hire people who are related to each other to work in or around your house…when things go bad, they will lie, cheat and steal you blind. It is good to have a “harmonious” work place, but with huge caution and constant monitoring. And no one is related as it will be fun to watch one snitch the other off, keeps people relatively honest (also the other issue is that you can seldom trust the client, that is why you have contracts and confidentiality agreements signed). …This state and county is in financial trouble and what does some financial genius do? These two “nit-witnesses” have shown up with their entire families in tow, all together nine. Yes, the District Attorney it would appear had to pay for all 9, if this is not a caper that has been pulled, someone, anyone, show me a better one. Alexie #1 and Alexie #2 got to bring 6 children from ages of 2 to late teens and one of their husbands along for this junket into the world of ridiculousness. How does that happen, Judge Perry also expressed his judicial concern…
Big interest right? This case is about as interesting as watching paint dry. There was 8 people in the audience and half were media, coffee should be allowed during these procedures as it is slow and daunting. Team Howard has to be ready for the big win, he is in the clear and everyone knows it. It is the “why” am I here question all over again…At this point a couple of other spectators that I have lots of respect for are saying the same thing. “When” will it be over……
Alright, you say what next? Here it comes, Quethlie Alexis speaks and understands English as well as many, good you say… …I was waiting for a laugh line at some point, it never came and there was a great deal of funny. It got so strange that she would answer in English and be told to wait for her translator. …Can’t get worse you ask, sure can, Creole – Haitian translator could only stay till noon…but will be back in the morning at 8:30 sharp. After Lunch we will have Nadine Alexie on the stand with no translator… …Oh before I forget, Judge Perry shared that this Creole – Haitian translator is the only one in the system in Los Angeles County (note: in the translator’s bag was a book on real estate, hmmm could a career change be coming?)
Talk about extraordinary situations, the District Attorney along with ICE had to assure that the Bahamian government would allow at least six of these people back into the country as their status is in question in the Bahamas big time…and unlike our great country, they don’t play games with this stuff…unless you are “pals” with the Minister of Immigration, by coincidence Anna and Howard were…his mom, Mrs. Gibson was even a nanny at one time for Anna Nicole Smith and Howard K. Stern. How cool is this, what ever happened to the good minister?
Well I have to be honest with all of you, I was dozing off so bad that I yawned I guess too loud and Prosecutor Rose looked back at me. There were a few people looking at me this morning, one was none other than the good doctor herself, Eroshevich. She was present with her lawyer and someone in the audience that I was told by a reliable source was her “boyfriend”…
…When the court broke for lunch the jury was removed and Steve Sadow wanted to know when was his turn? Judge Perry told him that due to the court and D.A. being hoodwinked (my words) by this group from the Bahamas that the normal order was going to be interrupted and he would get his (Sadow’s ) shot later in the week or early next week. I only showed up as I thought I was going to see Sadow make some “jerk chicken.” No Sadow, get my car to the curb, I am leaving. …and the jury also had the same pained look as many of us did…I am not going back till I am sure Sadow will be giving “the look.”
The prosecutor tried to get as much as she could from the “witness” in reference to many subjects, and much was hearsay and not allowed. It was dam near all “Her Say” and even some “She Say”…will we ever know. There was much talked about the “spoon,” and Quethlie went into some detail of finding the “spoon” and the “syringe” with blood in it and little cotton alcohol pads, “Kris asked for a spoon.” Judge Perry tried to have it explained to show how big the spoon was, “tea or soup”…once again, Judge Perry was not going to let this stuff into the world of the jury and again, go figure, what is going on here? Note: I have some very interesting first hand knowledge of this subject (spoons, needles, and dirty syringes) that was going to go into a book, this was all given to me as an example of how fascinating all of this could be! In our tell-all (I still have all my notes! just fascinating)
The “Nanny” Q also went into detail about a meeting with “TV types” right after Daniel died to do a show or video about his “overdose.” As it appeared that a deal had been made and was all ready to go. …And was very upset and Nanny Q stated, Anna Nicole Smith said, “I trusted you with my child and you killed him” this too was very dramatic and was said while the jury was not present in the courtroom….
Judge Perry was very clear that he was going to give this very qualified group of defense lawyers time to “Right the Ship. Madam Prosecutor had to wonder if she had time to build a new ship, as the one she was standing on was on the rocks with two masts snapped at deck level and the sun was setting fast!
We will have someone in Court tomorrow, September 10, 2010, to report on the cross-examination by Steve Sadow and the other two attorneys of the nannies.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
We do have someone in the court room today and here is how it breaks down as of the morning break. We are told that the courtroom is like a circus today and what our source thought would be fun to watch has turned into something painful to watch.
We have the two nannies, Quethlie Alexis and Nadine Alexie, of which Judge Robert Perry is not quite sure what they can offer to the trial, but he is going to let it go on for a bit. Which in my opinion is a good call after all those taxpayers deserve their money’s worth.
We have one husband and six [6} children all guests of the bankrupt state of California. The D. A. had to make a special deal with the Bahamian government to let them leave but also then to let them return within ten days as you might remember they are allegedly working there illegally, so right off we have a credibility problem and it just gets better!.
Even the nanny that speaks good English, Quethlie Alexis, has insisted on a Creole – Haitian interpreter. That got off good with the interpreter being 45 minutes late for court because she could not find a parking space. Did she not know this was a busy court house? Then add to that they had to do a special oath to swear them in because they would not swear to tell the truth so help them God, but only to tell the truth and leave out the God part… OH yea this is starting off good for today.
Renee Rose is doing the direct right now but the nanny up on the stand, Quethlie Alexis. forgets at times she can’t speak English and answers in English. What do you think Steve Sadow is going to do with this woman?
Is this like a Hail Mary pass for the prosecution?
Next update will be at the lunch break. Good job tax payers, pay for an illegal group of immigrants to vacation for ten days in your beautiful state, all expenses paid by the bankrupt state, has anyone asked Jerry Brown how he feels about pouring your tax payer dollars down the crapper? Perhaps the good taxpayers of California can pay for a trip to Disney Land for this group of tourists over and above what they have paid for round trip airfare, and hotels for NINE “visitors”!
Would you like for us to connect the videos they did with Mr. Controversy TV so you can refresh your memories?
Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.
I want to say first and foremost, I don’t ever want to read a slam against the Texas Courts again (just kidding) but WOW!!! For those who live in California is this Jury Questionnaire typical? This is the first of 3 steps to get on the jury of the Dr. Sandepp Kapoor, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich and Howard K. Stern in Judge Robert J. Perry court.
We read through it last night, laughed but also felt like this pool of potential jurors should feel violated.
Rule One: “You can not write on the back or add extra pages”, but how are you suppose to pass along the gossip about friends and what you really think of them? I have had a murder in my family of a cousin and her daughter over child custody, how can you explain all of that and my Aunt’s feelings in 2 lines, including the father died in California but the murders and custody was in Texas? How are you suppose to tell about picking up prescriptions, calling for an antibiotic for you or a child to save an office visit fee. How are you suppose to tell about the friend who is a nurse and said that phobias of hospitals is a good thing and not something you wanted to get over, and then proceeded to tell about huge potential fatal mistakes doctors made that the nurses had to correct or the patient would have died? How do you talk about the nurse you know who works for a plastic surgeon and the tales you heard, which may or may not have been true? How do you say in two lines about patients MUST be proactive in their care and hell yes, at my age I fire stupid doctors to their face.
Yea some cops are honest, some are not and then you have the cops who commit perjury, [remember that cop in the OJ case], and of course some cops are down right sexy. How do you explain a huge cover up of a murder not by the D. A. but by cops covering for cops and that “blue line”. How many of us watch CSI, Law and Order, the ID channel? How do you explain that any one that keeps up with the news just in California knows about the horror that happened to Cynthia Summers? How do you say that once convicted even if your opinion on hind sight you found that D. A.s are more worried about conviction rates and fighting to not overturn convictions even when clear evidence later were shown that cleared the wrongly convicted?
I don’t watch Entertainment Tonight, Access Hollywood, Inside Edition, Extra, TMZ or Fox infotainment news. But if you are even a semi intelligent news watcher, not mention the last week of news cycle about a right wing propaganda site putting up what they knew was an edited video to pull the scab off of racial fears for “page views” or “hits”?
How many of you d have favorite blogs, have a Face Book Account, a My Space, Twitter? Not to mention that for some reason LinkedIN was not listed and was it left off because it is a social media from professionals to network. Then you get into Google Alerts. How many get their news on the run in this busy world via a laptop computer or online reputable news like the AP online?
Then you get down to everything on this questionnaire becomes public record with ONLY your name protected? Is California going to pay your legal expenses when that neighbor, friend, family member, nurse who ever sues you in a Civil Court for running your mouth about them and medications, illnesses, legal problems and you just shared their life?
I was going to fill out this form in the worse type of joke, of spouse, the squeeze on the side, the lover, doctor, lawyer , Indian chief and there is not enough room so can I call home. I got to page four and said F – this.
Ken asked me who drafted this questionnaire that could not spell website [cite] correctly. I said usually the defense and D. A. fills out a wish list that the judge “rules on”, but this looks like a judge decided to take that large latitude they get in their courts because of that black robe. I wish we knew who suggested these questions and then how much did the judge impose because of his personal views?
Then once you get through this giant invasion of not only your privacy rights, but everyone you know; you get to go through a bankrupt California state doing a background check and we still don’t know if that is from speeding tickets, forgetting to pick up your dog’s poop, or something serious. If you get through both of these then you get to go threw jury Voir Dire, where the attorneys get at you hoping the court dismisses you, or the other side does so you don’t have to use one of your “precious strikes”. Not to mention as I said the extreme right wing Bible Thumpers, holier than thou or good cons will get in and a lot of good juror potentials will strike out. It is little comfort for you, your family and friends they want to know about is: “Remember: Questions are not asked to embarrass you. They are intended to make sure members of the jury have no opinions or past experiences which might prevent them from making an impartial decision.”
Here is a Jury Questionnaire from a federal court for a murder trial that involved a crime family.
My questions is that can this jury pool get through this first part, then the background check and then the Jury Voir Dire on August 2 and August 3 by the assistant D. A. and the defense attorneys and be ready to be impaneled for Opening Arguments on August 4, 2010.
Do yo think this is going to end up with the Fox Infotainment News Crowd, the Bible Thumpers, the holy then thou crowd and just those who con to get on a jury or is this a real attempt to get a “fair jury” of “one’s peers”? Share your thoughts with us.
LATEST FILINGS IN THE HARRIS COUNTY COURT IN VIRGIE ARTHUR VS. HOWARD K. STERN BREACH OF CONTRACT
July 23, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Response and Opposition to Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Continuance of Howard K. Stern’s hearing Objecting to Personal Jurisdiction.
July 23, 2010 Howard K. Stern’s Exhibit B filed with Stern’s Response and Opposition to Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Continuance of Howard K. Stern’s hearing Objecting to Personal Jurisdiction. I did not put up exhibit A as it is the First Court of Appeals Opinion granting Stern’s Writ of Mandamus.
Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
With a head line like that you can just imagine where this article is going.
I woke up this morning to a bunch of B. S. in my in box and was sure this was a surreal Trick or Treat Halloween prank and a pretty good one I thought. That is until I realized it was REAL and then the anger and feeling sick began to settle in.
We have Rita Cosby’s good friend, James Edstrom, writing on his “gossip site” today that at a party or nightclub he was at in December 2007 that O’Quinn was, “Two Sheets to the Wind”. We are please to say because of a tad of nudging by Rose Speaks.com, Edstrom cleaned up his article and gave Mr. O’Quinn the credit he deserved and took away the New York style of bragging when you really can’t remember for sure what happened.
The Houston Chronicle is now reporting that John O’Quinn was driving at a high rate of speed when his SUV became airborne and impaled on a t tree killing O’Quinn and Johnny Cutliff instantly. The Houston Police Department has turned the investigation over to it’s “Vehicle Crimes” department for a thorough investigation. That department said although the road was slightly wet it would not have caused the type of accident that killed O’Quinn and Johnny Cutliff unless O’Quinn had been traveling at a high rate of speed. They have recovered John O’Quinn’s cell phone from the wreckage and with that and the black box from the SUV they hope to have some answers next week. It will take several weeks to get the toxicology reports back, but police said it did not appear that any medication etc. was involved in the fatal crash. Which brings up a question I have. We have all heard the stories of a police officer placing a speeding ticket in the pocket of a speeder killed in a vehicle accident, could a posthumous charge apply to O’Quinn for the death of Johnny Cutliff? Mr. O’Quinn’s funeral will be on November 4, 2009 at 11 AM at the Second Baptist Church in Houston with a showing open to the public from 4PM to 8 PM on November 3. We do not have the funeral arrangements yet for Mr Cutliff but as soon as we do we will list it here for those of his friends whom have asked us to keep them updated.
With John O’Quinn now dead the fear of Houston publications being sued by this giant of a man literally and figuratively. They appear to be beginning understanding that and so slowly they are printing “their truth” about O’Quinn. Some if it includes that; “The death of John O’Quinn in a single-car vehicle crash abruptly and prematurely ended the saga of a man as big and brash and full of contradictions as his native city.” The Houston Chronicle article went on to say in part; “Like Houston — a brilliant, rambunctious city that sometimes seems to have a chip on its shoulder — the 68-year-old, 6-foot-4 O’Quinn combined great achievement, wealth and generosity with a gnawing insecurity. In this brilliant, rambunctious lawyer’s case, it took the form of alcohol abuse and a tendency to push his practice of law beyond his acknowledged courtroom brilliance to the ethical boundaries of the profession.”
“…O’Quinn was demonized by tort reform advocates as a symbol of frivolous lawsuits and outrageously large damage awards. … O’Quinn established himself as a premier plaintiff’s lawyer in a city renowned for its legal giants. Yet he rarely seemed at peace with that status, trying to fill a void that money and fame could not reach. In recent years, O’Quinn’s friends say he found a measure of contentment and stability. Even so, it’s hard to imagine this most dynamic of Houstonians ever wanting to rest in peace.” Many in Texas say that John O’Quinn almost single handed was the motivation for tort reform in Texas and thus Texas is now a safe haven for doctors to practice and not have to pay a fortune for malpractice insurance.
Virgie Arthur, Anna Nicole Smith’s estranged mother, will be making her first public interview since the Inquest into Daniel Smith’s death in 2008. Ms. Arthur has returned to a trusted allied in Geraldo Rivera to do the interview. It is ironic the interview will on Halloween night, kind of fits Geraldo’s bizarre sensationalism. Ms. Arthur is expected to talk about her personal loss with John O’Quinn’s death. Knowing Geraldo though I am willing to bet the conversation will cross over to her enemy Howard K. Stern being bound over for trial in California with two of Smith’s doctors, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor and Khristine Eroshevich with the third arraignment of the three scheduled for December 11. Surely as a “lawyer” (cough – cough) Gerlado knew this was to be expected and is no real win which equals high fives for his participation in this “alleged” lynching. So be sure and set your clocks for Geraldo, have a glass of red wine and see how Geraldo turns all of this into sensational infotainment for the All Mighty Dollar, [advertising revenue]. Does Geraldo, you think, ever feel any shame or is the nature of infotainment is those who bring in the advertising dollars get to keep their much lusted after shows?
Then there is Harvey Levin, the Jewish gay lawyer/journalist that has made internet sensationalism via his celebrity gossip blog into a way to bring in tons of money via advertising. Are we seeing a picture emerge here that involved infotainment and dollar signs? There are plenty of allegations around Hollyweird, we have learned, that Levin, if our source is correct and the allegations are true, also shares one thing with Anna Nicole Smith – an addiction to Methadone. Isn’t he just a tad afraid that feel good Jerry Brown might hone in on him next?
Levin, since Anna Nicole Smith’s death, has hardly held back his personal disdain for Howard K. Stern while showing favor in positive articles for his “good friend”, Larry Birkhead. Levin and his staff have allowed, since 2007, many – many posts of anti-Semitism and right down hate for Stern to flourish uncontrolled on TMZ.com and often fed by Harvey Levin via TMZ.com.
The sickest example of this lust for that all mighty advertising dollar, is the horrid reference to the now infamous Anna Nicole Smith’s clown video that has been released in public discovery in both the New York defamation suit of Howard K. Stern vs. Rita Cosby but also as of yesterday the California criminal proceedings.
If one is to believe what Harvey Levin appears to be alleging about Anna Nicole Smith in her ninth month of pregnancy, then we must assume Levin is implying that Dannielynn Birkhead was born suffering from the effects of multiple drug addictions. Now how is Levin going to explain that one to his good friend Larry Birkhead? Perhaps the free face time and positive press he has always lavish on Birkhead will be enough for Birkhead to forgive what Levin appears to saying in his most recent allegations involving the infamous clown tape and Howard K. Stern.
I bet this morning or yesterday, Levin was beating himself up for not buying that tape himself at the time he bought the photos of the refrigerator from the Bahamas home known as Horizons; the infamous unfilled fax for medication from Dr. Eroshevich to Dr. Kapoor just days after Daniel Smith, Anna Nicole’s son, died. Then of course there are those continuous changing and selling of affidavits by the nannies which neither the National Inquirer or Birkhead found to be believable but Levin bought them right up for publication on TMZ. Do you feel sorry that Levin let the infamous clown video slip through his greedy hands?
Harvey have you not been watching the preliminary hearing and the sharpness of Stern’s criminal attorney Steve Sadow? My bet is you ain’t seen nothing yet, and get some new news not the recycle bull shit appearing on your web celebrity slamming blog site. You like all of us knew Stern and the two doctors would be bound over for trial, so why the cheap shots by you? Oh yea I forgot that constant chase for the illusive advertising dollars in a shaky economy.
Finally we have Lin Wood playing with Georgia Attorney Susan M. Brown a frustrating game for him called “where are the hard drives”.
In the latest filings in the South Carolina federal court the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith is asking for contempt charges and sanctions against G. Ben Thompson and his “former” attorney, Susan M. Brown.
In more of the excerpt of Brown’s deposition released with the October 29 filing, you have to wonder where Brown got her law license. Now to think that Wood made a comment about Texas lawyers lacking ethics, I bet he is feeling a Georgia lawyer is also a tad shy of ethics today.
As you read the excerpt with again some pages redacted, at the end do you have any clear idea of “where are the hard drives”?
I came away scratching my head after seeing so many attorneys in the deposition of Susan M. Brown in person and by phone distancing themselves from Brown in what has to be an old time record of “we don’t have them, do you”, behavior, of “where’s the hard drives”.
What does happen to an attorney if it is proven that she did commit a crime of fraud as the Memorandum from the Georgia Court ordering her to appear for a deposition states and proves to be true?
There is the Motion for Contempt, the Memorandum of Law in support of the contempt and sanctions, new exhibits to read, some old exhibits referred to and the excerpt of Lin Wood trying to pin a room full of lawyer down to “Where are the hard drives” in a game which is funny and sad at the same time.
Ah the continued entwining of all things Anna Nichol Smith and the money and publicity she has continued to earn in death. Do you think the Georgia attorney, Susan M. Brown is being investigated for ethics violations in Georgia as well as the charges she faces in South Carolina?
Ms. Brown as does Gaither Thompson II, Gina Thompson Shelley and Melody Thompson have to file their answers by November 16 after being added to the lawsuit in place of a few Doe names. We also have a far more serious filing from Brown due on November 16, the Contempt of Court and Request for Sanctions against both her and her previous, or is she still his current lawyer, G. Ben Thompson. Ah to be a fly on the wall when that hearing finally takes place.
Is Anna Nicole Smith more famous in death then she ever was in life? Has her death created a new piranha feeding frenzy not seen before in the land of gossip and infotainment?
I’ll get back with all of you after I force myself to watch Geraldo, I really don’t like the guy. I wonder how Virgie Arthur looks after being out of the lime light for the last 18 months.
We will have all of the latest documents listed by date and court here today. Check back and remember that the downloads are opened to ALL not just members of Rose Speaks.com.
October 29, 2009 Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate Motion for Contempt and Sanctions against G. Ben Thompson and lawyer Susan Brown for keeping Estate property and copies of property WAY after the Court Ordered all property and copies of property to be returned to Wood’s office.
October 29, 2009 Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate Memorandum of Law to support the Motion for Contempt and Sanctions against G. Ben Thompson and lawyer Susan Brown for keeping Estate property and copies of property WAY after the Court Ordered all property and copies of property to be returned to Wood’s office.
October 29, 2009 Exhibit A of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley, et. al, which is an additional excerpt of the deposition of Susan Brown from October 5, 2009.
October 29, 2009 Exhibit C of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley, et. al, which is the courier receipt for picking up the Hard Drives to deliver them to Wood’s office dated January 21. 2009.
October 29, 2009 Exhibit H of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley, et. al, which a letter from Teresa E. Lazzarom to Luke Lantta returning additional Estate property dated September 22, 2009.
October 29, 2009 Exhibit I of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley, et. al, which a second letter from Teresa E. Lazzarom to Luke Lantta returning additional Estate property dated September 24, 2009.
October 29, 2009 Exhibit K of the Estate of Anna Nicole Smith vs. G. Ben Thompson, Ford Shelley, et. al, which is an Affidavit from Niall Cronnolly that the hard drive had been removed from Susan Brown’s computer on October 8, 2009 and destroyed and method used to destroy the hard drive on October 9, 2009 at 11:15 AM.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Entries (RSS)