Numerous people have asked if I had a comment or thought on “the verdicts.” That afternoon I was on my way to New York for an assignment with one of my sons. I had the driver put the limo’s radio on the local news and heard the verdicts. Funny, the day before Dr. Bubbles was reported to be in a state of tears and Howard was comforting her…I was not sure if that was a “hug” or a “head lock,” either would have been appropriate…one more than the other, LOL

(…I was fired by Dr. Bubbles…NEVER was I fired by anyone involved in this case! Anyone who can show me proof in writing that I was ever “fired,” I will pay them $5,000… …and as I warned, “Let sleeping dogs sleep.” Or I promise, there will be tears enough to fill a very big pool! Also let me just say this to try and understand my position, reality never hit home with some of these people, and when I feel like I am being lied to or bullshitted I am gone. Be right with me and I will stand at the gates of hell with you, do the other, I will be having a cold drink sitting by a nice cool stream.)

Sure, like many I am surprised that Dr. Fabulous aka Kapoor walked away totally free…his “acts” of… …he does come across as likable… …He also had a great lawyer…

…Dr. Bubbles Eroshevich I believe never made any money in this adventure that she pursued with much gusto and energy to be in the “in crowd.” I have been told that she was paid for interviews during the “fun times” right after Anna Nicole Smith’s death. However, I have never heard of her actually making any money. If true she is the only one who did not make hundreds of thousands of dollars, THE only one. My other thought is that she came across as arrogant and not likable during the trial, smiling or those silly gigles at inappropriate times…simple, she does not come across as likable. I told Dr. Eroshevich of my concerns and that I felt that her license was in serious jeopardy. For reasons that will remain quiet, Dr. Eroshevich had choices…

…The evidence was not always 100% but keep in mind, in every lie there is a little truth. And something did happen, got it? good, get it!

For Howard, again, one of the smartest guys I have ever met, he thinks and rethinks and thinks some more. Is he a control freak? As much as he is brilliant and people with that characteristic can create havoc in their lives. Why? …With the money Anna had, a real nurse could have been hired, a real body guard could have been hired, but… …there was a great deal of truth in what was said about those dam spoons…”oh no Mr. Bill, tell me it ain’t so”….remember the “tell all,” I do.

…this jury took a great deal of time to come to the conclusions that they did. The district attorney is very much aware that they won, they got a conviction and to think that a judge is going to make it all go away? Wake up, it was Judge Perry who was told to “believe in the jury,” well he did and… ..The timing is bad, it is an election year and these defendants are in the middle of it. Steve Sadow I thought had the jury and they were getting it, I was wrong again …I still believe that Steve is a great lawyer and as I said before, this is Los Angeles and L.A. juries, well they are L.A. juries!

To read the complete article visit Desperate Exes.com, well worth the read and to give it all some thought.

http://desperateexes.com/2010/10/31/the-verdicts-are-in-trick-or-treat/.

©John J. Nazarian
October 31, 2010
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith Tell All, Brad Brunon, Bradley Brunon Esq., Celebrity Trials, Chris Smith Esq., Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Desperateexes.com, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Garofalo Esq., Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, High Profile Trials, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Chris Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Judge Robert Perry, Steve Sadow Esq., Virgie Arthur

It is very common in a criminal trial or even civil trials for a jury to ask for “technical legal interpretations” during their deliberations or to even ask that a witness testimony transcript be read back to them.

The questions asked that are being addressed in a morning hearing today are the following:

1. “The note from the jury stated that the language in two of the counts `speaks only to prescribing, not furnishing, aiding or abetting,’ and “How does this charge apply to Howard K. Stern?’

To me that is a no brainer. We do not have everything said in court during the trial but to the best of my knowledge no one accused or gave any testimony that Howard K. Stern has ever written any prescriptions. Picked them up, yes. Should have read them and notice his name were on a few, yes. But I have never heard of him falsifying or copying one of the doctor’s signatures to obtain any of the prescriptions. There was testimony that he was more involved then what Stern claims, but no “hard proof” was testified to. In this case I think the answer to that would be “only in the felony conspiracy charges”. I expect the judge to agree and detail this for the jury.

2. “The panel also questioned whether the verdict for Stern automatically depends on the verdicts for the two physicians, Sandeep Kapoor and Khristine Eroschevich, or whether the jurors are to consider the defendants separately.”

This one is harder to read, since I would think the felony conspiracies would be all or none, and the doctors both have stated that they did not know each other before being charged and the only common denominators were Anna Nicole Smith and Howard K. Stern. Other than the conspiracy felony charges I would think you cannot judge a lawyer for following a doctor’s direction unless the lawyer was directing the doctors which again I don’t think there was any evidence of the ole “Stern was the kingpin” as we have heard in the civil cases.

That said something more has me a tad concern. Why did Judge Robert Perry take an unscheduled vacation while a jury was out on a high profile criminal case? Unless it was an emergency and both the lawyers and jury were told that, the fact that Judge Fidler is now in charge of the deliberations phase, this gives me pause and a little concern.

I checked with court watchers and attorneys last night and could find none that unless it was a family emergency and then the deliberations are put on hold, that a judge has taken a “vacation” at the beginning of deliberations, or for that matter until the verdict came in. This includes civil, family and criminal lawyers and court watchers I checked with. The reason for that is the sitting judge for a trial has been there since hour one and knows the facts far better then any other judge.

What is more worrisome to me is the statements that Judge Robert Perry made to lawyers during the trial, especially that this was one of the three worst cases of prosecutors over reaching type statements and then reversing the direction he was going in and not throw out several charges nor did the D. A. office streamline and drop some of the charges as Judge Perry suggested. If you remember Judge Perry’s attitude and statements we have read was that he felt none of the charges reached the bar needed to prove felonies. His instinct was to toss the case until as the AP reported he spoke with another judge he had great respect for and was told to “trust in the jury system and let the case be decided by the jury”. I think we were all stunned by that sudden about face. Then the question of which other criminal judge would Judge Perry had received this advice from? Most judges do not discuss a case they are sitting on with another judge, after all judges are kings in their own courtrooms those black robes assure that. The only judge I know of that would possibly speak to a judge during a trial is the administrative judge over all of the courts. (I, E. Lindsay approached Judge West the sitting administrative judge for the whole civil division when she wanted a case transferred to her.).

Then I did more research and found that Judge Fidler IS THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE for all 34 criminal courts in Los Angeles county and runs a tough court, often having his mind made up before the lawyers even argues a point, as in interrupting them in mid sentence and ruling.

This could be two things, political with Judge Fidler saying the buck stops with me and in this season of AG Jerry Brown running for governor, and the L. A. District attorney running for AG of California that Judge Fidler has stepped in to take the heat if a none guilty verdict comes back. Or it could be Judge Perry had an emergency thus prompting “an unscheduled vacation”, but would that be a vacation? Or in a long shot you could have political decisions and heat being put on Judge Fidler that the prosecution was not getting a fair shake from Judge Perry.

Whatever the reason that should give everyone a moment to pause, however that said, none of us will ever know what is going on in the background of closed offices and heat because this is a political season.

The hearing is going on now this morning, we shall see how this goes and what the judge rules. I don’t think any of us can determine what these questions means EXCEPT that the jury is seriously considering the guilt on some of the charges for the doctors.

Can y’all go through this charging document and share what has been dismissed, what is pending, and if any more charges were ever added after March 2009. Also it is the conspiracy charge that kicks in for the aiding and abetting? Or is that some where in this charging document dated March 19, 2009. I have to admit I am confused here.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following.

We will be listening to all of our readers about new case. Do you have a tip for us on a case for us to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL

©Rose Turner
October 14, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Beverly Hills, Bonnie Stern, Brad Brunson Esq., Bradley Brunson Esq., Celebrity Trials, Chris Smith Esq., Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Garofalo Esq., Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., High Profile Trials, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Chris Smith Esq., Judge Larry Paul Fidler, Judge Robert Perry, Steve Sadow Esq., Virgie Arthur

Today begins the final arguments in the Anna Nicole Smith drug trial in California of Howard K. Stern, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor. However did Steve Sadow make a giant strategy error?

It appeared that Judge Robert Perry was on the same page and agreeing with the defense team of which Steve Sadow has become the de facto lead attorney although he only represents Stern.

We have read for weeks where Judge Perry was upset with Deputy District attorney Renee Rose and the rest of her team, many times stating he felt that the D. A.’s office was way over reaching in this whole trial and he was not sure if the D. A. office of Los Angeles had even reached the minimum bar of standard to pursue this case.

We have also read where it appears that each of the prosecution witnesses for the most part was turned into defense whiteness or in the case of the nannies that the bankrupt California paid what appears too many of us to be a mini fortune for “witnesses”.

With all of that going on anti Stern folks began to holler foul or this judge was “again bought off”, boy Stern must have a lot of hidden money to keep paying off judges in two different countries.

Based on the tone of the judge and the rulings he has made the defense suddenly announced at the end of the prosecution case they would not present a defense and would rest and go on to Motions to Dismiss and then final arguments. That caught everyone by surprise but made sense out of what we had been reading. Judge Perry appeared as I said to be on the same page as Sadow.

However last week after hearing multiple Motions to Dismiss and by his own ability to revamp the charging document, Judge Perry dismissed a large amount of the charges and strictly told the Renee Rose to simplify the charges because otherwise it would look like confusing the jury or even abusing the jury. Judge Perry went on to say this is only one of the 3 worse cases he had ever heard in his hundreds of criminal trials during his career.

Here is the sticky point did Steve Sadow at that time make a mistake that could cost his client and the two doctors dearly? When Judge Perry said this should all be misdemeanors Sadow agreed, but then Sadow went one step forward further and pointed out to the Court that once the felonies were stricken by the court then the misdemeanors had to be dropped because they had not been pursue due to the statute of limitations. At which time the AP said Judge Perry answered, “I had not thought of that”.

Thus at the end of last week, Judge Perry left at least one felony charge against Stern and multiple felony charges against Kapoor and Eroshevich. Was Sadow as an officer of the court obligated to tell the judge about the statute of limitation or did he make an error in strategy? From his last minute argument that to go forward even if the judge overruled the jury verdict it would still cost his client his law license and both doctors their medical records. Judge Perry seemed to be unmoved by this argument and returned to what most criminal presiding judges said that he felt that cases should be decided by a jury. That to me was not unexpected, how would you like to be a juror that gave up over two months of your life, to have the judge say “never mind”.

So today as the final arguments go forward many of us are amazed that happened and wonder what the jury will decide, unless Stern buys them off also, (said with tongue in cheek cause I don’t think he has the money to pay anyone off, nor would any of his lawyers ever be a part of that).

The final arguments are going to be tense, but remember Judge Perry is the one that gives the jury the final instructions and plenty of judges in the past has used that point to express such narrow scopes and tone of voice that a jury will “get it”, or have they already?

SStay tune here at Rose Speaks.com for updates throughout today.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

We will be listening to all of our readers about new case. Do you have a tip for us on a case for us to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL

©Rose Turner
October 4, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Assistant Deputy Attorney Renee Rose, Brad Brunon Esq., Bradley Brunon Esq., Celebrity Trials, Chris Smith Esq., Criminal Judge Perry California, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Deputy District Attonrey Renee Rose, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Garofalo Esq., Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, High Profile Trials, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Chris Smith Esq., Judge Robert Perry, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert Perry, Renee Rose, Steve Sadow Esq., Virgie Arthur

$24,386 in travel expenses to bring the two loons from the Bahamas? This has to be one of the funnier aspects of this case, how these two people with little education got one of the biggest District Attorney’s offices in the United States to spring for that kind of money???

“Two years for investigators to ‘UNRAVEL THE PUZZLE’ of the case”… Oh, I have to be careful here, did that include any time in the sun? And how much did that investigation cost the State of California and the District Attorney of Los Angeles? …ever build a house of cards?

Early on I was very curious if these special agents and investigators had any idea who these people were, the witnesses and the history they carried to the circus that was developing in the Bahamas. ….Or that silly SOB who said that I had “climbed his fence”…such garbage the flies would not eat it, nasty trash.

Whatever happens it won’t make a hill of beans to most of us, and I can see this following the tidy bowl man right on down the crapper where it belongs. …Pretty incredible stuff, sure all the bloggers have their opinions about many of these people involved and how “wonderful” they are, and how “good” they are, and the interesting part is hard for some to understand that many of these people involved in this case would not empty their bladders if these “fans” were on fire. And if for one minute you question the “financial” aspects of this case and look closely you would be sorely disappointed. Judge Perry has his hand on the flusher and I think that he is going to send this case cascading into the sewer below the Criminal Courts Building here in Los Angeles.

“We believe there were felonies“…what happened to them? Did they fall through the cracks with the rest of this case? …hmmmm and that dam “spoon cooking stuff,” (special wink to my “friend”). Funny stuff as with the “cross dresser” and…

To read the complete article visit Desperate Exes.com and get John J. Nazarian’s take on all of this.

http://desperateexes.com/2010/09/28/i-hear-a-flushing-sound/.

Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site.

Visit our Download Section for all documents on the cases we are following:

We will be listening to all of our readers about new case. Do you have a tip for us on a case for us to follow? If so Contact Us, a link appears at the top of all pages; ALL TIPS ARE OF COURSE CONFIDENTIAL

©John J. Nazarian
September 29, 2010
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Bradley Brunon Esq., Celebrity Trials, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Deputy District Attorney Renee Rose, Desperateexes.com, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Garofalo Esq., Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., High Profile Trials, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, J. Chris Smith Esq., John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Judge Robert Perry, Renee Rose, Renee Rose L.A.D.A office, Steve Sadow Esq., Superior Court Judge Robert Perry

Walking into Judge Perry’s court yesterday, I saw Stephen Sadow questioning Nadine Alexie and doing “the Sadow,” that being asking a question and then glancing at the jury. ….Oh I hear it, “she’s a liar,” “she was paid off,” “it is all for an apartment,” my only thought is this, is she a liar? Is she the only one in that room that could be classified a “liar”…I think not!

…Sadow was focused on the “going into hiding” that Nadine described after being contacted by the media via phone and at her door. On her way to becoming famous. There was mention that Larry King may have called, that would do it for me, “Larry King is on the phone,” go hide. Nadine’s response to that line of questioning seemed real to me, however odd all the “hiding” and game playing and calling it “fear”…hiding from what? And she took her sister, nanny Q, with her, all hiding! Hell, there are people I know that keep in constant contact with “media” to assure that they are around for special times!

Nadine spoke of being let go by Mr. Stern due to Howard K.Stern’s concerns about “leaks,” what leaks it was not clear. However, by this time, it would appear there were many. Funny thing about having “total control” is that it seldom works. It was that “total control” and manipulation that got everyone in this mess.

Look at what I call the Bahamian Master Plan, and how that plan collapsed when Anna Nicole Smith died. At some time that plan will be thought out clearly…don’t get carried away, it was not a plan of mass destruction. It was a plan for a life that would be lived in the Bahamas with their daughter, the good life, away from the annoyances of the states, California in particular! Is there anything wrong with having a plan to rid yourselves of an “annoyance”? Not at all. Keep in mind the way things would have gone had Anna not died.

….There was some discussion as to the money that was promised by the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office and it was somewhere in the arena of $2,000 to $2,500, worked out by her husband, Amol .

…You could see the look of disgust on some of the jurors…it was an uncomfortable feeling and even more uncomfortable thought. …

….Prosecutor Rene Rose wanted to present evidence that was already given to the defense, but with a small change that members of the defense objected to. Judge Perry’s response; “grossly unfair.” Prosecutor Rose once again tried to present the material in a little different way, Judge Perry, “Gross Surprise.” One of the lawyers on the defense stated that some of the pictures were “pornographic.” Judge Perry responds, “Seems late to me Ms. Rose.”

…I cannot remember ever seeing a judge as annoyed with a prosecutor as Judge Perry appears to be with Prosecutor Rene Rose. Most of the time during the day Judge Perry had the appearance of someone in pain, and the fist to his cheek did nothing to change my belief that this bench officer is pissed.

Be sure to read the complete article at Desperate Exes.com.

http://desperateexes.com/2010/09/16/the-best-laid-plans-of-mice-and-men-and-stooges/.

©John J. Nazarian
September 16, 2010
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Alexis and Nadine, Anna Nicole Smith, annoyances of the states, Bahamian Master Plan, Bradley Brunon Esq., Celebrity Trials, constant contact with “media”, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Deputy District Attorney Renee Rose, Desperateexes.com, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Garofalo Esq., Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Gross Surprise, grossly unfair, High Profile Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Howard K Stern, John J. Nazarian P. I., Judge Perry, Judge Robert Perry, L. A. Criminal Court Judge Robert Perry, Larry King, Los Angeles District Attorney, media, Nadine Alexie, pornographic pictures, Prosecutor Rene Rose, Quethlie Alexis, Renee Rose, Seems late to me Ms. Rose, Steve Sadow Esq., The Bahamas, the Sadow, Virgie Arthur

G Ben Thompson, a South Carolina developer, said he began a romantic relationship with the former Playboy model when she visited his Myrtle Beach home in the summer of 2005. He said she stayed in his room while Howard K. Stern, her lawyer and sometimes boyfriend, stayed in the guest room.”

That is dedication, Anna would go in and take care of business with the wealthy developer and Howard would be camped out in the “Guest Room.” Was he still her boyfriend at that time or was there a time-out called? This behavior was called into play with one of those politicians in the Bahamas at one time, was it not? And I can see you all getting your soap boxes out to shout “not fair.”…

…“Smith was pregnant, and when her daughter was born in September of that year, Thompson said, Smith asked him to put his name on the birth certificate as father of the child.

“I contemplated it but it was not the right thing to do,” he said. “I knew I was not the father. I had had a vasectomy.”

“A vasectomy.“ well that is nice, as there are a few in this Anna Nicole Smith saga who I am sure have had frontal lobotomies. …And if there was any question at all there sure was none when the little girl was born. Just beautiful, and let me say this, … …Soooooo why did Anna Nicole Smith go through all that she did when she was alive to prevent the truth and “him” from taking the rightful position that he deserved? ……. Even looking back and realizing many people had been duped, in the “happy couple” thing. Even though all of us who had any sense stated, “the baby looks like him, you know the other “him.” And in the end it was proven who “daddy” was, him…. …The question is this, had Anna Nicole Smith lived would she have ever given credit to the rightful father, and if not why? Was it the outside influences, was it the drugs or was it something more devious?

Read the rest of John J. Nazarian’s article at Desperate Exes.com

http://desperateexes.com/2010/08/26/hooterville-comes-to-la-g-ben-thompson-takes-the-stand/

John J. Nazarian
August 26, 2010
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, birth certificate, Celebrity Trials, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Desperateexes.com, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, High Profile Trials, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Horizons - Anna Nicole Smith's home, Howard K Stern, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Myrtle Beach, Myrtle Beach south Carolina, South Carolina, The Bahamas, vasectomy, Virgie Arthur

Superior Court Judge Robert Perry has said Smith’s cause of death is not an issue in the trial of Stern, Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor. The defendants are not accused of causing Smith’s death.”

Well that makes me wonder, Dr. Perper’s previous decisions are they final? Is this bunch totally out of the woods? It would appear that Dr. Perper has big problems coming and fast. How many times can someone fall before they die and it is still considered an accident? I guess if someone keeps falling with or with no help that could be murder. Well except in Florida. Perper was a breath of fresh air to the Three Stooges. He found that there was no foul play, or words to that effect. Now that his sense of reasoning is being questioned could this be a problem for the “magnificent three?”

The rumor has been out for awhile that maybe Florida would look into filing murder charges against Howard K. Stern, and the two docs. My research tells me that it is still a possibility, and have wondered with comments coming from the bench if this is not an omen. ….

…“The prosecutor objected to Monday’s testimony, saying the defense was trying to implant the impression that everyone around Smith was scheming to get money.”

…Prosecutor Renee Rose used the word “Scheming“ in reference to Mr. Sadow’s questioning of Da Moester and his “disc with photos.” Howard [K. Stern] knew from the start that the disc was stolen and was at his wits end trying to get it back or to stop the usage of it. After all, that was money that should have been going to the estate of Anna Nicole Smith and not to Moe & Taz (I love that name combo). …“Scheming,” everyone had an angle and to many the “scheming” continues. Along with false witness, get while the getting is good, be careful what you wish for, show me the money, The Common Good, and one of my favorites, No Good Deed Goes Unpunished.

…15th Circuit Deputy Solicitor Jimmy Richardson said the five residents are being called in the trial because they were familiar with Smith and her physical condition. “They were witnesses to the demeanor of Anna Nicole Smith,” Richardson said quoting documents from California officials.

Ford Shelley told Hyman that spending four or five days in California will put a financial hardship on the group because they will be away from their jobs. Shelley also said he told investigators in the case he had no knowledge of Smith’s demeanor.

“We were not a party to any of those things,” Shelley said during Monday’s hearing.

…”we were not a party to any of those things“, what next…”what Anna, Anna who?” “Howard Stern, I don’t like his radio show.” Come on, it is all about their fear of getting on that stand and the “Great Sadow” brings to light all of their interesting past life experiences (remember our system gives everyone a chance to attack each other …all of us have things to hide, some more than others). …Sure while in South Carolina throwing rocks was fun, shit it was nothing short of a F’n party and now? They will be getting to meet the ultimate get even guy, yup and that will be “The Gentleman from Georgia” Steve Sadow. …

Someone correct me if I am wrong, was this not the group that entered Anna’s house, [Horizons], moments after her death to make sure all of Anna’s, [Nicole Smith] and Howard’s, [K. Stern], personal property was safe and sound from “thieves?” And was that not some of the same stuff that went sailing off into the sunset to only reappear in different media outlets. No I am wrong, I am sure that never happened, I need to get some rest…

And in closing some of my readers are curious who am I supporting…I do not like anyone in this case (with the exception of one or two). My initial response was that I thought two guys were just trying to do well by a child. This I stated publicly and I do believe that the father of that little girl loves her more than life itself. I also believe that the other male in the picture also loves that child with an equal amount of love. I don’t like any of them, not one and I am sure that feeling is quite mutual and I guess it is my weeks of studying the discovery that confirmed much for me. For sure I had my own thoughts about the “players” and their behavior. The work of the investigators just made the “light” brighter and in time it all made sense. And like all of the rest I too have an agenda, would I consider it “scheming” no I don’t think so. And for any pending lawsuits I understand TRUTH IS A DEFENSE, so as long as you are not lying and have proof, you are good. Then again it could also be more like a poker player, you just never know till someone “calls.”

Interestingly John J. Nazarian continues to break his almost 3 years of silence, his next installment on Desperate Exes.com is a MUST read. I love that he is going to be in court for what I consider the “main witnesses and builder of this house of cards”. Be sure to read the rest of this article on Desperate Exes.com.

http://desperateexes.com/2010/08/10/anna-and-the-three-stooges-part-iii/

©John J. Nazarian
August 10, 2010
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: 15th Circuit Deputy Solicitor Jimmy Richardson, Anna Nicole Smith, Assistant Deputy Attorney Renee Rose, be careful what you wish for, Bradley Brunon Esq., Celebrity Trials, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Desperateexes.com, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Perper, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Garofalo Esq., Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., false witness, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, get while the getting is good, High Profile Trials, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Honorable Robert Perry, Horizons in the Bahamas, Horry County South Carolina, Howard K Stern, J. Chris Smith Esq., Jimmy Richardson, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert Perry, Maurice "Big Moe" Brighthaupt, No Good Deed Goes Unpunished, Renee Rose, show me the money, Stever Sadow Esq., The Common Good, the “scheming” continues, Virgie Arthur