The Joy Behar Show had Dr. Phil on Before his eye Opener Interview with Cindy and George Anthony
Posted by Rose in Casey Anthony, Caylee Anthony, Caysee Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony, High Proflie Trials, Jose Baez, Roy Krunk
Joy Behar had Dr. Phil on last night, September, 12, 2011, to discuss his interview which part one was today. Joy Behar show comes on at 10 PM EDT on HLN!
Just as we thought the Casey Anthony coverage had died down, here is the latest from this horrific missing persons case. The Joy Behar Show had Dr. Phil discusses his interview with George and Cindy Anthony. Dr. Phil’s interview with the Anthonys will be the first one they’ve done since Casey’s murder trial! I watched part 1 today and talk about softball questions and Dr. Phil thinks Casey Anthony is Satan incarnate made me glad I still have a remote to change channels. Nothing was new except the amount George gamble away over $30,000 in just a few months, was kicked out by Cindy for abut 6 or 7 months after Caylee was born, right before Christmas 2007, and Casey begged her mom not to take George back. Dr. Phil which appears willing to slap his decree on anything never mentioned the jury felt George was lying, like about the girlfriend in 2008. Perhaps he will get past the being nice and saying Cindy hides from the truth and George knew who killed Caylee, we shall see.
Last night Joy sat down with Dr. Phil to discuss his highly-anticipated, remember numbers sell ads, 3-part interview with George and Cindy Anthony! In the interview, Dr. Phil shared a sneak peek of the interview, and gave his take on the discussion he had with Casey Anthony’s parents. In the Anthony interview, Dr. Phil tried to get to the bottom of whether or not the Anthonys knew what really happened to poor Caylee. He specifically addressed Cindy Anthony’s suggestion that Casey may have a brain tumor, which, in Cindy’s eyes, explains how Casey went from having a “normal” childhood to admitting to burying Caylee’s body in the woods. Did anyone on the witness stand ever say and prove it was Casey? I remember thinking I cam away with more questions then answers.
Dr. Phil analyzed Cindy Anthony’s “brain tumor” explanation to which there is no medical proof, saying:
“I think she is desperate to reconcile within herself how her daughter could do these things or this thing. Because she’s saying, ‘My daughter couldn’t do that. She was a loving mother, she was an attentive mother. This is so out of left field for her, something had to make her do that.’”
What do you think – are George and Cindy Anthony crazy? Will you tune in to Dr. Phil’s 3-part interview?
We encourage all of you to join other posters to discuss all of the cases we cover. Diamond Girl runs the community part of the site and remember discuss the evidence don’t attack other posters. If you read a post that upsets you just scroll past that comment http://community.rosespeaks.com/ I seldom step on the forums that belongs to the members and is in great hands with Diamond Girl and she will be having a robust discussion there that all of you are invited to join
Visit our Download Section on all cases involving Casey Anthony for all documents on this case we are following.
Follow Us On Face Book and on Twitter and see who Rose Speaks is following.
©Rose Turner
September 13, 2011
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners. If comments to this or any other articles are not related to the article or does not meet the terms of use for Rose Speaks, they will be removed by the moderators.
Please also read our Terms of Use
Entries (RSS)
We won’t see any of this here but I always thought the media would get anything more on this story….not sure I would even bother watching. But the whole story hasn’t been told..
Heath, the simple truth is just that, simple. She killed her kid….end of story and we as Americans should be ashamed of the fact that a child lies dead and we all know who did it!
John J. Nazarian, P.I.
John, You are exactly right!.. The simple fact that the jury did not find her guilty does not mean she is innocent.
I think most thinking persons that know about this case regardless of what the jury’s decision was knows that she is GUILTY of killing her daughter one way or another.. For some to say imo because of the jury’s decision or because the prosecution did not make their case means that she should walk imo can’t add 1 + 1 = 2.
Cindy’s excuses are just that EXCUSES… It is a sick family dynamic and I believe in karma. Cindy and George going on Phil was only a exercise in how sick the family is imo…. I am not a Dr. Phil fan but this did give insight on many things imo.. With a family like that imo Caylee is better off imo sorry to say..
I don’t want to explain the end of my last comment, I DO NOT think Caylee should be dead.. Casey imo should have given her up to a family that wanted children with out her mothers influence or hers..
Liann [3] That’s how our system works. If the jury finds the defendant not guilty, they get to go free. No tossing them into jail and disregarding the jury just because they don’t come up with the verdict others who are not on the jury wanted. It may not be the most perfect system, but it is our system.
IMO, there has got to be a way that ANY jury can be questioned about if they have the ability to understand instructions that are given by a judge because the jury on the Anthony trial sure didn’t get it. I had my doubts when they announced the verdict but then several gave interviews which only proved that they did not follow the instructions and didn’t even bother to ask for claification at all.
I think the biggest thing that really pisses me of is the fact that Baez stated some very nasty shit in his opening statement and NEVER showed any proof of it. Meanwhile it stayed in all of the jurors minds. I also believe that a plan was hatched to make sure that Casey didn’t get the death penalty. I bet Jose, Cindy, George and Lee didn’t figure it would work out so great. When there was no proof given to those allegations, I do think that the judge should have held Jose in contempt of court , turned in him to the bar or sanctioned him— something, anything…..to show such behaviour will not be tolerated in a court of law during a trial.
The biggest loser in this farce of a trial was Caylee Anthony. Not only did she lose her life, her body was tossed in a swamp to rot and she has not received any justice for her early death.
hmmmm| maybe Baez’s hands were tied by the system? IMHO there is ALOT more to this story and it involves one George Anthony. Someday it may come out, or maybe not.
I blame the prosecution for the outcome of this trial. In their rush to prosecute this person with FIRST DEGREE MURDER/DEATH PENALTY they used the media to try to convict her. 3 years of it! Many times prosecutors/investigators take years to get evidence for convictions. Sometimes it just takes that long. Some people didn’t drink the media koolaid and asked questions about the “evidence”. It is so evident that many, many people on these message boards didn’t. Once you start questioning (honestly asking questions) there is no way you could convict BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED.
It is horribly sad that this death has no answers – no real answers beyond supposition. I totally blame the SAO/Prosecution for that.
For those that drank the leaked media hype – think for yourself next time and demand answers! Don’t let your “public servants” botch another murder case!
Please know I am not addressing this specifically at this site – it is for anyone who might read this who feels “someone got away with murder”.
#5 Ken, I get that but it is my right also to speak my mind because of the 1st and say imo how I do not agree…
DG,
,
I would like to comment further but time is not on my side right now…
The prosecution failed. They went for first degree murder instead of lesser charges that could have been more easily carried out by the jury. Keep in mind that the jury was faced with possibly sending this girl to death. I don’t agree with the death penalty in most cases, to kill in order to teach that killing is wrong. Life in prison without parole, 40 years in jail, 30 years in jail, anything would have been a better punishment than what she got. Asking a jury to come back with a guilty verdict without flawless evidence is next to impossible. In this case, even though the jury doesn’t do the sentencing, I do believe that if the death penalty was not an option, the jury would have been more likely to come back with a guilty verdict. In the big picture, if there is a heaven and hell, which is indeed what Casey herself claims to believe in since she mentions needing her bible while in prison, she will end up before the ultimate judge, one that she cannot fool.