Michael Jackson Dr. Conrad Murray Medical License Revoked in California, Murray to be Tried for Jackson’s Death as Covered by Sprocket
Posted by Rose in Arnie Klein, Beverly Hills, Celebrity Trials, Chernoff & Alford, Dr. Arnold Klein, Dr. Conrad Murray, Dr. Conrad Murray, Dr. Mark Lester, Edward M. Chernoff, High Proflie Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Judge Michael Pastor, Michael Jackson, Sprocket, Trials & Tribulations, Trials & Tribulations Daily life of a true crime junkie
This is an unedited, draft entry. Please refer to the MSM (mainstream media) for 100% accuracy. If you are copying and pasting to other web sites before the edit, please be sure to include a link-back to this specific entry and this disclaimer with your copy. Thank you, Sprocket.
Deputy District Attorneys:
Deborah Brazil
David Walgren
Defense lawyers
J. Michael Flannigan
Joseph Low
Edward Chernoff
#21 Christopher Rogers LA Co coroner Chief forensic medicine.
##22 Dr. Richard Lewis Ruffalo Clinical Anesthesiologist
Christopher Rogers
LA Co coroner. position. Chief forensic medicine. Supervise doctors who work at coroner’s office, and occasionally do autopsies himself.
Manner of death?
Homicide
Homicide based on what?
It was based primarily based on the info we had on the medical care MJ receded. The care was substandard.
Cross by Flanagan.
Now tell me, how do drugs get in to the heart blood?
Well, in this setting, propofol has to be administered intravenously, and so that blood circulates throughout the body.
.
So, an injection? Yes. Iv? Yes. Orally Yes.
But in the event that propofol were taken orally, that’s one way it could appear in the stomach? Yes, that’s a way it could appear in the stomach.
And if this is the hypothetical, of ingestion of propofol by the decedent, and ingestion of lydocaine, by the decedent, this would not be a homicide?
I would think it would still be a homicide. Based on the quality y of the medical of care, I would still consider it a homicide even if the Dr. did not give the propofol…
REDIRECT
Let’s assume that Dr. left him alone with the patient and the patient self administered, (snip; I don’t get the full hypothetical) you would still (rule it a homicide based on the standard of care.)
Yes.
Recross Flanagan
So, even if Dr. Murray gave more than 25 mg between 1040 and 10:50 we still have the same result that MJ would be awake at 11 o’clock?
Yes, assuming there was a single dose.
And that he would also be dead by 11 o’clock? ???
Richard Lewis Ruffalo
Anesthesiologist.
And what’s a clinical pharmacologist? That’s someone who studies drugs and how they are used.
So, he thinks the numbers of the benzodiazapams from the heart blood, he thinks reflect an injection/ingestion of a HIGHER dose than what Dr. Murray states he gave.
To read the rest of the first part of day five and for all of the detailed information as to what Sprocket heard and saw visit Trials and Tribulations.
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2011/01/dr-conrad-murray-prelim-day-6-part-i.html.
Postscript added by Sprocket 5:54 p.m.
This is an unedited, draft entry. Please refer to the MSM (mainstream media) for 100% accuracy. If you are copying and pasting to other web sites before the edit, please be sure to include a link-back to this specific entry and this disclaimer with your copy. Thank you, Sprocket.
Focusing on just those that you mentioned, who now become an extreme departure of care.
Yes.
So each individual, when you put them together, it becomes so egregious, that it becomes extreme. That any physician should know should be trained in the basics of life support.
Overall, identified several points of extreme deviation of care.
And addressed the one handed CPR on the bed. “Totally useless.”
One handed behind the back? It’s totally useless. You can’t get enough pressure to push down on the chest. We use that in neonatal. Describes what you should do with an adult in the bed. Describes how you get them out of the bed easily. Even if you claim you can’t move the person from the bed, the proper training would be to protect the head, slide the individual off the bed, and then be able to start chest compression.
Even if they are morbidly obese, you can generally do that…
Cross by Flannigan
45x what it is in the hospital blood. That doesn’t go with your theory.
Yes, I made a mistake.
Now if we have 45x whets in the stomach than what’s in the blood. then we have evidence of oral ingestion.
We may have to check with the coroner, to check with what the numbers mean. Now, it doesn’t make sense unless he ingested it orally.
So, we’re back to it being orally? Well, we’ll have to talk to the coroner.
It’s a big difference isn’t’ it?
I totally agree.
REDIRECT
Assuming self administration as Mr. F included, would any of your opinions change in your standard of care?
No. You don’t walk away from a patient. (explains in detail. Addicts, that is the first tip off, you don’t walk away, just like a heroin addict.)
The people rest their case.
No defense presented except a statement
Judge Pastor: Is the Attorney General present? (did JP ask that? I think they said they were!)
JP said he was ready to rule on that request (from the medical board).
This court has reviewed all the evidence the def motion to dismiss is denied. Appear 2 me of the evidence the offense has been committed, in order Dr Murray be held there for.
Ms. Saunders Medical board.
We’re appearing on behalf of director of the medical board, to provide justice and that as a condition of bail, that the defendant have restrictions on him as a condition of his bail not to be able to practice…
After trial, that this order to this defendant not practice and to show that an order of the safely to the public has been met.
Since the defendant held over, that there are restrictions on his license are in effect we further request that he be prevented from practicing here in California.
Judge Pastor: Increase the bail, court denies the request. Satisfied that the bail presently set, which is three times the presumptive bail (is sufficient (. Certainly recognize posture. court does have the ability to reconsider, I have done so and I am satisfied and shall remain.
This hearing has been a significant hearing as far as presentation and evidence and the rights of the defense to explore evidence presented and to underline the sufficiency of any case. The cross has been extensive probing and vigorous. There is no erroneous issue of a depravity issue.
So as I balance all of these factors under Eldridge and People vs. Ramirez, due process has been afforded Dr. Murray.
Circumstances have changed have changed dramatically, court finds extraordinary mandates to approving the request by the medical board.
So, he’s restricting the license or banning it all together. cites a case the overall consideration of the protection of the public, and I’m satisfied that non intervention at this time, does impose a danger to public safety.
In this case there is a direct nexus and connection between the actions of Dr. Murray, and a homicide. …and the fitness and competence to practice medicine.
In undertaking an issue of restrictions ct recognizes the standard of proof is not simple probable cause, the standard of proof the ct must utilize, there is clear and convincing proof that there is a certainly that sanctions are appropriate.
Immediately cease and desist from practicing in the state of California is now suspended by this court as a condition of bail.
They are to notify the appropriate authorities in other states within the next 24 hours.
Provide represite proof to this court, in the next 24 hours. to any and all licensing agencies where Dr. M holds a license.
Dr. Murray is not to practice in any other jurisdiction, in less he is so license.
Arraignment will be set two weeks from today. January 25th, at 8L30 A. M.
Nothing else?
Sprocket goes into detail, it is a great read and gives more information then what the main stream media has time to give. Be sure to keep up with all of the trials covered by Trials and Tribulation.
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2011/01/dr-conrad-murray-prelim-day-6-part-ii.html
Be sure to participate in our COMMUNITY , get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the community where you can discuss things about the cases in a debate area of the site. Diamond Girl who is in charge of the community has made it easier to join and be part of the discussion.
©Sprocket
January 13, 2011
Used with the permission of Sprocket Trials & Tribulations
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our true crime writer, Sprocket, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Entries (RSS)
http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0120_jackson.pdf > 52 p. court filing
MJ Songs, Art and Photos — Tale of Thievery
1/20/2011 by TMZ Staff
“Katherine Jackson’s business partner illegally made millions of bucks from Michael Jackson’s music, photos and drawings — this according to a lawsuit filed by MJ’s Estate and obtained by TMZ.
The MJ Estate has sued Howard Mann — the guy behind MichaelJacksonSecretVault.com — claiming Mann has duped fans into believing his website was kosher … when it was in fact, “rife with illegal uses of Michael Jackson intellectual property.”
According to the lawsuit, Mann displayed “arrogant disregard” for the Estate’s copyrights on all things MJ … and wrongfully published clips, artwork and trailers from “This Is It” — content from the “Thriller: 25th Anniversary Edition” CD and much, much more.
The Estate also accuses Mann of posting an “unreleased” MJ song called “Opis None” … which in reality, was a remix of the song “Destiny” which The Jacksons released in 1979. The Estate claims Mann had no right to publish the song … and the confusion he caused damaged the MJ Estate.
The Estate also claims Mann published several sketches that MJ drew himself … including one titled, “Bubbles Chair” … as well as a number of copyrighted photographs in Katherine Jackson’s coffee table book, “Never Can Say Goodbye.”
The Estate believes Mann hauled in more than $1.5 million in sales from the book in its first two days — money that rightfully belongs to the Jackson Estate.
The Estate wants to recoup all of the revenues Mann raked in from the sale and publication of the Estate’s property … plus punitive damages — which surely could be in the tens of millions.”
I hope they win their lawsuir against these people and I really do not care who else is involved with it. His children are the ones to earn ANY revenue from their father’s work. Not uncles, cousins, ex wives of brothers, nieces, nephews.
Time and time again in the preliminaries the defence pointed out the propofol in the stomach and that Michael possibly drank it. The amount 0.13 mg in 70grams od content is minute, barely en ough to be taken in a small.small sip.Yoy could hardly swallow such a small amount.It has diffused from the bloodvessels in the stomach and possibly through the stomach wall.In the trial the amount of 0.13cc liquis should be demomstated to the jury.
Sorry for typos.K.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-12500588
A link showing part of the Opera that premiered tonight in London.