Anna Nicole Smith Trial and the Circus Plays On!!!!
Posted by Rose in All Things Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole's Nannies, Beverly Hills, Celebrity Trials, Controversy TV, Daniel Smith, Daniel Smith's Inquest, Dannielynn, Debunking the myths on ALL cases related to Anna Nicole, Desperate Exes, Dr. Kapoor, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, High Proflie Trials, Hollyweird Criminal Justice, Hollywood, Hollywood Criminal Justice, Horizons law suit, Howard K Stern, J. Christopher Smith, J. Christopher Smith Esq, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P.I, John Nazarian, John Nazarian PI, Lincoln Bain, Mr. Controversy TV, Nazarian P. I., Steve Sadow, The O'Quinn Law Firm, Virgie Arthur
The only consistent thing about Nanny Q and Nanny N is the inconsistencies. The biggest question I have is who thought bringing the “Ninneys” from the Bahamas? Along those same lines did anyone from the DA’s office go and speak to these two people? Now we have nine people, eating three meals plus a day, nine accommodations, and because they are flight risks (my thoughts) there is security assigned to them 24 hours a day! To assure that they don’t get lost on the way to the airport…do they have escorts also? Cha-ching!!! Once again, Judge Perry had it with these Bahamian shenanigans…
From my personal knowledge and not from any of the stooges, Nanny Q was close factually on some of the issues but again, Judge Perry is not going to allow any “sliders” or “spit balls” in his courtroom. It almost seems to me that the prosecutor knows that what she is asking is “wavy gravy,” but what the hell, ask it! And if one of the three barristers doesn’t catch it or the guy in the black robes misses it, Madam Prosecutor wins… …biggest lucky charm was of course the incredible presence of Steve Sadow, Esq. “The Gentleman from Georgia”…and Judge Perry.
The idea that has to gall the defendants is the costs involved in charging them with what was charged. And what about the costs involved for the defendants, for sure if Kapoor is found not… The type of medicine he practices I am not sure if his patients care what his background is. Eroshevich, she is old and will at least… …Howard, who knows, as I said in the past he is very bright on some issues, others, hmm no so much. Did anyone intentionally kill anyone, I don’t think so. Did Dr. Bubbles and Dr. Fabulous try and do the right thing, I think so, and did Howard love Anna not a question in my mind.
…For a law enforcement authority to charge a group or individual, they must have strong evidence that will stand on its own… …Fine-tuning is one thing, but what I have seen so far in the witnesses and experts, fine-tuning, sure like trying to play a piano that fell 10 floors to crash on the street below. …There will always be those who will “really” want to know what happened in the final hours of Daniel and Anna. And the biggest wild card of all, with this being Los Angeles, is the jury pool….
Read the rest of John J. Nazarian’s take on this trial by visiting Desperate Exes.com
http://desperateexes.com/2010/09/10/there-is-not-going-to-be-any-truth/.
©John J. Nazarian
September 10, 2010
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Entries (RSS)
Brought this over from the previous thread.
Levi Page talk radio show discussing case:
Lengthy discussion between host and local attorney
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/levipage
Interview with Dr. Perper
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/levipage/2010/09/10/levi-page-show
Woman retracts previous claim at Anna Nicole trial
By LINDA DEUTSCH (AP) – 35 minutes ago
LOS ANGELES — A key witness at the Anna Nicole Smith drug conspiracy trial has retracted a previous statement that she saw Smith’s boyfriend Howard K. Stern inject the former Playboy model.
Quethlie Alexie, who worked as a nanny for Smith in the Bahamas, acknowledged Friday under tough cross-examination in Los Angeles that she signed an affidavit saying she saw Stern, a defendant in the case, inject Smith with a white substance.
However, Alexie retracted that claim and a number of other statements.
Stern, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor have pleaded not guilty to multiple charges, including providing Smith with excessive opiates and sedatives. They are not charged with her drug overdose death .
#2….. HOLY SHIT !
2 & 3
Here is the link…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20100910/us-anna-nicole-smith/
No surprises here…..has the judge thrown the case out yet!
John
#4
Better and Better! Wow!
The reason being I am only thinking out loud that certain prosecutors maybe wanting to jump out of one by now……and how much did this train wreck from the Bahamas cost?????
John
If I was the DA I would cancel the air fare and let them take a train back to the Bahamas!
Here’s the entire article – there’s more…………..
Woman retracts previous claim at Anna Nicole trial
LINDA DEUTSCH | September 10, 2010 05:27 PM EST |
Compare other versions »
Compare 05:27 PM EST04:36 PM EST and 05:27 PM EST04:36 PM EST versions
——————————————————————————–
LOS ANGELES — A key witness at the Anna Nicole Smith drug conspiracy trial retracted previous statements and testified Friday that she never saw defendant Howard K. Stern or anyone else inject Smith with anything.
Quethlie Alexie, who worked as a nanny for the celebrity model in the Bahamas, acknowledged under tough cross-examination that she had signed a sworn affidavit saying she saw Stern inject Smith with a white substance.
She then retracted that claim and a number of other statements.
Stern’s attorney, Steve Sadow, asked, “You did not see anyone inject anything into Anna Nicole?”
“No, I did not,” Alexie testified.
“And that is the truth?” Sadow asked.
“Yes, I never said I saw anyone,” the witness said, speaking through a Creole interpreter.
Story continues below
Advertisement
Sadow then read from the affidavit filed as part of a 2007 lawsuit by Smith’s mother in which Smith is referred to as Mrs. Marshall, her legal name.
“Didn’t you say, ‘I personally observed a white substance being heated in a spoon by Mrs. Marshall in her bathroom. I then observed Mr. Stern tie a band on her arm and inject the substance into her arm,’” Sadow said.
At first, Alexie said she couldn’t understand the question, but when Sadow repeated it, she said, “One time I saw something tied on her arm but not the syringe.”
Sadow tried to ask if she had changed her story because the autopsy on Smith showed no needle tracks on her arms. But the prosecution objected, and the judge barred the question.
Alexie has testified that she saw Stern, who was Smith’s lawyer-boyfriend, and Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, another defendant, take Smith into a bathroom. When they left, she found a bloody syringe, cotton and burned spoon of liquid, Alexie said.
Eroshevich’s lawyer Brad Brunon asked Alexie why the witness did not mention the items in her first affidavit provided to an attorney in the Bahamas.
“I did speak about it, but they didn’t put it in,” the witness said.
He asked if she began making those statements when she learned she could sell her story for a lot of money. She denied doing that.
Alexie also testified that Smith was virtually unconscious from drugs for most of the three months she worked for her.
There was confusion, however, about Alexie’s claim that Smith slept for two days at a time after drinking from a bottle of medicine.
“When I say sleep, it’s wake up, talk, laugh, go to sleep again,” Alexie said
Stern, Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor have pleaded not guilty to multiple charges, including providing Smith with excessive opiates and sedatives. They are not charged in her overdose death in 2007.
Brunon also quizzed Alexie about an explosive claim that Bahamas immigration minister Shane Gibson had a sexual relationship with Smith and gave her preferential treatment in obtaining resident status.
The claim, along with a picture of him in bed with Smith while fully clothed, led to his resignation.
Asked if she had said Gibson visited Smith in her bedroom frequently, Alexie said, “No, I didn’t say that … He never went in Anna’s bedroom.”
John, I do enjoy your sense of humor. Thanks for attending court and giving us your take on the proceedins.
#10 correction “proceedings”
Who was Virgie sueing in 2007? Who helped get that affadavit? The Bahamian attorney?
Beth – here’s a link for President Obama’s press conference.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/10/obama-news-conference-pre_1_n_712058.html
#12 Bewildered – here’s a link to th affivadit signed 12-4-2006
http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_documents/021407_affidavit_2.pdf
To think they used witnesses like this to build a case against 3 people that would ruin their lives. Anna has had a very thorough autopsy, she had Doctors everywhere. She died with the proper levels of her meds except the one she swigged from a bottle… blaming 3 people for her own actions will not bring her back.. enough this is just a painful bullshit and a total waste of money. I don’t know how as practisers of law they can even hold their heads up amongst their peers.
I would sack the DDA for being a knuckle head for starters.
I tend to think that the DDA was handed a case that she did not believe in all due to JB and the influence he had over the entire bullchit.
Is Virgie still in Court to see this? Did she believe these people? How much did she believe Ford Shelley? Or did she know it wouldn’t hold up. How much has the statements from these 3 alone affected the media, books and the Public.
I would be looking to recover costs in Texas from a blogger case. Can they do that after being non suited before this case was shown to be a load of crap.
Harassment and they used the Courts to do it…The South Carolina case should be a good one…..but this has gone way too far and for what???
#14 Sammy1 I remember this affidavit this is the one that Ford Shelley paid her to do for the paternity suit California in Nov. or Dec. 2006, the one that she said on Mr. Controversy TV that the Ferguson woman prepared and paid her $100 to do, I just watched the video on that where she had recanted it once to Lincoln Bain… what is GOING on in California that NONE of these inconsistencies where checked before paying ALL of this money for 9 ppl, rooms, meals, air fare, etc. and now back to the Bahamas and new apartments???? HELLO can we say a MAJOR conflict here????
#17 Heath you need to ask John but I don’t think VA came back after the long weekend in August that 27 and 28 and then the weekend…
#18 Rose – If used the affivadit would have been defamatory in nature. Will be so glad when all this is over and people can go about their lives once again.
Rose, do you know what this is about? This was posted elsewhere by HS
1st COA Teresa Stephens
Motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing enbanc Relator
Date: 8/20/2010
Event Information:
Event Type: Motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing enbanc disposed
Description: Relator
Date: 9/2/2010
b Disposition: Grant motion
Set Date: 9/15/2010
Calendar Type: Status
b Reason Set: Motion for rehearing due
Another update by AP
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/7959843/woman-retracts-anna-nicole-smith-claim
Portion added:
Brunon also quizzed Alexie about an explosive claim that Bahamas immigration minister Shane Gibson had a sexual relationship with Smith and gave her preferential treatment in obtaining resident status.
The claim, along with a picture of him in bed with Smith while fully clothed, led to his resignation.
Asked if she had said Gibson visited Smith in her bedroom frequently, Alexie said, “No, I didn’t say that … He never went in Anna’s bedroom.”
Sadow also quizzed Alexie about a baby shower that was held for Smith at the Bahamas home during the period Alexie said Smith was semi-conscious. Alexie claimed Smith was asleep and had to be carried in to the event.
Sadow then produced 20 photographs of the balloon-festooned shower and displayed them on a big screen for jurors. The images showed Smith dressed up and smiling, holding up the baby for the camera, cutting a cake and displaying gifts.
Sadow asked Alexie to explain the pictures.
“Everything she got they put in her hands to hold up,” she said.
Oh dear!
Did anyone check to see if her pants were on fire?
#21 Sammy1, Stephens asked for an extension to file her Motion for rehearing en banc for the dismissal for failure to file her appeal correctly, the First COA agreed the Motion to extend the time for her to file her Motion. … housekeeping basically.
Thank you Rose.
Different reporter plus video – some difference in story , not much.
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/entertainment&id=7661478
Miriam Hernandez
LOS ANGELES (KABC) — A key witness in the Anna Nicole Smith drug conspiracy case was called into question Friday as defense attorneys dismantled earlier statements by Smith’s nanny.
Quethlie Alexis had originally testified that Smith slumbered for days, unable to get out of bed because she was so medicated. She portrayed co-defendants Khristine Erosovich and Howard K. Stern as keeping Anna Nicole in a stupor.
But upon cross-examination by the defense she began to contradict herself, saying, “When I say sleep, I mean wake up, go to bed, wake up.”
The defense also poked holes in statements she made about a three-day stretch of time when Smith was so out of it she had to be carried out of bed and propped up at a party for her new baby.
Defense attorney Steven Sadow displayed 20 photos from the baby shower depicting Smith beaming, holding the baby and embracing Stern, Erosovich and the nanny.
Alexis was also asked about a confidentiality and retainer agreement she signed days after Stern fired her which gave a law firm exclusive rights to sell her story about Anna Nicole Smith.
The defense questioned whether she had an agreement to get money. She answered no through her Creole translator, explaining that she signed the document without fully understanding it as she did not know how to read.
According to Alexis’ first affidavit, she was concerned about Anna Nicole’s suitability as a mother, and her “flagrant” sexual relationship with a Bahamian official who promised to give Smith legal residency and allow her to keep her mansion.
According to the document, Alexis was also seeking papers herself and complained that her processing was delayed because the official was spending so much time with Smith. The defense attorney pointed out that the nanny had not mentioned any concerns about syringes, needles, burned spoons and drug paraphernalia that she later mentioned in testimony.
(Copyright ©2010 KABC-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)
Great article John.So glad you are there to tell us what is going on.
Lizzie #23.. PRICELESS.. you ROCK.
OK, they keep saying the last name Alexie.. ( They both have the same last name right?) was it Ninney Q today and this week??.. was Nadine last week or just FS recanting?, Has both Ninney’s testified? Sorry I am behind, only one said they would swear to God iirc, is Quethlie the only one testifying and recanting and if so why the whole clan coming to town.. What am I missing?? Thanks in advance.. Is this what our tax payers dollars are wasted on???, OH KFIAM John and Ken would love to follow such BS on what Jerry does with California’s nonexistent money… Trivia testimony shit for Jerry’s gain.. They love to follow the money the politicians try to incur and why they back something on the who the why and where.. Damn
Nanny Q the one that bragged she was going to pharmacy school and wrote down all the medications, suddenly remembers she does understand english, can’t read and never knew what she was signing. What a joke.
doesn’t understand english
I thought Quethlie last name was Alexis. And Nadine was Alexie. In Dec 2006 NQ said she was married with 1 child. And NQ worked days and NN worked nights. NQ also said that Mrs. Gibson was at Horizons a lot. As well as some friend of the Gibson’s named Shirley. NQ sounded jealous and said that the DL was bonding with NQ and the other ladies were confusing the baby. And that ANS threatened to shoot NQ if the baby ever called NQ momma. Anyways in 2006 NQ last name was Alexis.
Looks like they will back? the defense still has to do the cross with Nadine? I’ll have to read up on NN’s earlier testimony. She worked from 10p.m. till 8 a.m. 7 days a week. And was the last to be fired. My guess would be that after NQ was fired, NN went into espionage mode.
And about Stephens. From the document I read, the COA has rescinded their earlier ruling to give Stephens an extension. Stephens reason for the extension was flawed. Not supported by law. So that would be the end of it? MOO
Nadine was the aspiring pharmacist. According to yesterday’s testimony, NQ can’t read.
the nannies ,MO,Taz,FS even VA they only care about how much they .will get but JB the big man the man with all the laws and know not to put an people who did not do nothing in jail so help me God
knucle head…. haha hadn’t heardthat in a while… perfect description though
I get these 2 mixed up. Is the same nanny that claimed to be going to pharmacy school the same one who said she couldn’t read and didn’t know what she was signing?
should have read down further….. thanks glenna for clearing that up for me.
wonder if the defendants and their lawyers are starting to breath a little easier yet?
RIP…. Thomas Cullen, Elaine Cillo, Bruce Simmons you are missed each and everyday. RIP to all the other souls murdered in the WTC and Pentegon attacks.
Roxie we should each remember in our own way about 9/11 and those who died and will still die from the after affects.It is just to bad that it is being made into a political thing instead of a remembrance day about those that perished.This should not be a hate filled day,it should be a day to move forward.
I’m still trying to figure out where all these children came from that are staying out here in California. At the time that the nannies Q&N worked for ANS, Q had one child and N had two. Evidently one of them had a child in 2008. That would equal 4. Maybe the other 2 are step kids? Not that it matters, lol, I just want to get the “story” straight.
I don’t pay attention to what’s on T.V. to much. I wear my heart on my sleeve and nothing will ever change that.
Thanks Swims
DDARose would be expected to know full well that the nannies were going to testify falsely; more evidence for dismissal of this fraudulent case and a referral of DDARose to the CA Bar.
Agent Santiago provided false information at the preliminary hearing as he reiterated information he claimed he had heard directly from the nannies – that being the only thing that tipped the balance toward sending the defendants forward into this malicious prosecution.
Judge Perry called the nannies’ testimony crucial based on the sale’s pitch for it from the government. Now he has heard first-hand that he was lied to repeatedly by agents of the government.
JB needs to answer for having used the people’s money to pervert Justice and promote his candidacy. He should be impeached and removed from the AG’s Office now to prevent further harm to the people and the State of CA.
Posted at 8:26 AM on Sep 11, 2010 by Only swim in the Ocean
This week no one mention DL’s birthday No one mention Daniel’d death…..in this bog I mean.
Why would DDA Rose have any problem with the BAR? She is a prosecutor and a very qualified and highly trained prosecutor, she dont get to pick and choose, she has a job to do. And has done the best that she can with bullshitters, liars, grifters, cons, Star Chasers, thieves and the list could go much longer…..and this goes for ALL involved in the life of Anna Nicole Smith. Come on, I agree that this trial has been a disaster for the defendants, but they did not get to this point in their ‘lovely’ lives by attending, church and temple!
Remember this, ‘all’ of this ( the life style ) was just ducky and would have gone on forever, that was the plan folks……and I am not going to get into this much deeper, all anyone has to do is to look at the ‘Plan’……and what tactics would have been used to dice and slice those that were seen as a ‘problem’.
Rene Rose is a class act and I promise you that here career will be fine……….
All my best,
John
John, DARR. apparently didn’t do her homwork well enough.. IMO.. WTF?
homework ~
OK, How does the State/R. Rose have unreliable witnesses willing to testify??. ( Because that’s all they got?) How did this even get to court??.. Maybe by paying their rent and relocation and all expenses of a family 8 or more?, Who else??..
41
What I am about to say may sound harsh and I’m sorry if it does but…… I don’t sit around and think of these people everyday. I do not know them personally. I’m sure if they were family then I would have no problem remembering a birthday or the date of some ones death. Honestly, everyday life is hectic enough right now and I don’t make a point of writing this stuff down on a calander. If I had read and seen it mentioned somewhere else then I would have commented but I don’t go to the other sites so I didn’t see it.
That it wasn’t mentioned here, I think shows, regardless of what we have been accused of in the past, we are not obsessed at this site. For myself, I have followed this for so long that I simply want to see it to the end and I believe the end is very near.
Roxie and # 41 it was mentioned in the forums on her BD and she can’t read yet even if she knew anything about anysite dealing with any of this mess tha I also hope will soon be over one way or the other.Better to maybe not mention then call her names like I have seen other sites do.!!!!!!
I am in total agreeance with you Liann. Assuming, of course, that the Los Angeles DA’s office actually had a choice as to whether, or not, to file charges. JBrown gave HIS investigation to the DA’s office and basically washed his hands of it. Or so JB said. At that point the DA’s office became responsible for ensuring that the criminal charges were in fact provable. And to do their own investigation. I would think that the credibility of witnesses would be top priority. And background information on each of them would be necessary to see that everything was checking out. Which would have revealed a whole lot of nonsense going on, imo.
Putting my biases aside, I have yet to hear one media report of a State’s witness that in any way proves the charges. Where are these 1000s of documents and 100s of witnesses that JB spoke of? What was found during the search of the defendants’ computers? And what point was made with that handwriting expert? Where is the testimony from CURES? Are they holding that off till the end? Big mistake, in my way of thinking. I would think the CURES testimony alone would prove the charges. And that would have been a good place to start, and then build the case from there. But now whatever remains to be heard from the prosecutor is going to be overshadowed by witnesses that recanted, rescinded, were mad at HKS, etc., etc. This criminal trial is wrong in so many ways, but the most obvious is that the whole situation SHOULD have been handled FIRST by the CA Medical Board.
Question – Why is WV posting comments on “T” since she is on the witness list? According to her post she is scheduled to testify later this month,
I have been thinking about the Pro Se defendants that5 have a hearing on the 13th.If McShame won by default could he in any way use this to go after the others in a new way.We all know how sneaky he is. Or he could try to have it brought in at the California hearing.Maybe they think VA could then get her own back sort of an I gotcha or at least tried to.Saying see a conspiracy was proven we won the case.They are not going to say it was only won by default because the last people in could not afford attorneys.Am I being too paranoid?
The prosecutor knew that all this people is not telling the truth and they did not care they want to put HS in jail for something he did not do think about the 11 charges aginst HS.
Sammy is Vice supposed to tetify in the Texas case or the California case????? I do not go to topix
Sorry should have asked about WV instead of the name hope it gets out of the back room as i very seldom drink coffee LOL So is WV testifying in the Texas case or the California case
That was fast
46
I’m not a member of the forums so I didn’t know it was mentioned there.
49
She has appeared again? Funny. I thought she was done with the whole internet thing…………. Good, she can tell them all about the internet gossip that she “researched” and found and turned over. What a joke. The prosecution may just be desperate enough to put a “internet investigator” who never met Daniel, Anna or any of the others on the stand to spew her bullshit.
#52 hmm According to her posts, she has been called to testify in Calif later this month. Yes, she and DC are both on the witness list previously published.
hmm – she is posting in sketchy code. One of other posters had difficulty in understanding her code. WV posted back in clear language that she has been called to testify.
Glenna #48,
Excellent post! Completely spot on IMO.
Here’s link to CNN report of 9-10-10. A little more information
The comments are interesting as well.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/09/09/california.anna.nicole.trial/index.html?iref=allsearch
Sorry, I failed to include the link for #59
OK, 38K to the so called expert that uses google or the internet for his opinion, FS and family fought coming to testify, Did they come on their own dime?.. I doubt it.. Nannie’s and family relocation, rent 1st and last, utilities, Moe and his travel expenses, logging and so forth. what else?..
opps, sorry
double posts
John [42] I agree with Liann [43] apparently DARR did not do her homework cause if she had she would have chosen not to put a few [actually all] of these people on the stand. No one [exception of the Doctors or so called experts] she chose as a witness for the State has told the same story twice, each one has told at least 2 or 3 different versions. If she was that damn good she would have went back and read what these witness’s had told either to the media or in other affidavits in the beginning, middle and then end.
What I would really like to know is who’s paying for the accommodation of those Witness’s who have to travel there from other States or Country’s. Is the DA’s office footing the bill or are the people of the most bankrupt State paying for these people to be put up in what is probably nicer living than what some CA’s are accustom to.
Hell I just saw on the News in CA a McDonald’s in one of the poorest neighborhoods raised their $1 menu items up by 49 cent.
These people are the same one from RC,book and DW,s inquest they did not tell the truth then .
PixieMom [65] Exactly!
Rox [55] She must think it’s her time to shine once again,
IMO, DAA was handed a case and told to do whatever…… What was a surprise to me was that most of these charges that were filed was based on a law that had been changed in Sept 2006. Anyone with half a brain knew that the stories would change by these witnesses. The experts that she had testify either looked up their information on the net… (OMG)or placed their “expert opinion” on dealing with Smith for 45 minutes.
It will be intersting to see how the investigator testifies, since in her depo she admits she is not experienced or trained to perform such a job. I wonder if DC will testify and which version of the story will be stated this time. When will Santiago testify?
Has virgie been in the court all this time with the exception of a day or two missing? Or is her “Quest for the Truth” now over?
DG I don’t believe she was ever on a “quest for the truth”I think when ANS stopped giving her family Money ect, they turned on her and it was not because they thought it was the right thing to do,it was to make money off her.!!!!!!!!!!
The hearing is today is it not? I mean in Texas with the 3 left in this law suit!!!
hmm, no hearing today. It’s scheduled for the 24th and 27th.
69. I agree with you. How many times have we been told that Virgie needed to be there because she has a quest for the truth?
Ok Ken I thought there was a phone hearing for you guys today. DG i kind of knew you were being sarcastic LOL
Ken I was thinking of the pre-trial someone mentionedon the 13th!!!
OMG! Sammy have you read this story?
http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2010/09/13/1167074/trial-for-hunter-who-shot-husband.html
She thought he was a bear?
#75 Beth – hey girl, good to see you. No, I hadn’t seen this article. Poor woman. Imagine having to live with the knowledge that you were responsble for the accidental death of your husband with your 4-yr old daughter nearby.
I haven’t heard anything today about the CA trial. Hope to hear something soon.
Guess JB learned his lesson about posturing and ranting with the “ANS Trial.”
http://www.tmz.com/2010/09/13/lindsay-lohan-michael-lohan-medical-board-investigates-doctors-prescriptions-drugs-add-adderall-attorney-general/
Is there no news from yesterday or today in the Cal trial?
http://www.marinij.com/tablehome/ci_16073473
Jurors see slide show in Anna Nicole Smith case
By LINDA DEUTSCH AP Special Correspondent
Posted: 09/14/2010 12:47:10 PM PDT
LOS ANGELES—A Los Angeles jury has seen a dazzling slide show of Anna Nicole Smith appearing healthy and involved with her baby during three months when a prosecution witness claimed she was drugged and barely able to function.
A defense attorney presented 90 pictures Tuesday including some taken days after Smith gave birth to her daughter Dannielynn in 2006.
The presentation came in the trial of the late model’s boyfriend Howard K. Stern and Drs. Khristine Eroshevich and Sandeep Kapoor, who have pleaded innocent to giving Smith excessive drugs.
There were shots of Smith feeding and kissing the baby, posing family-style and in a bikini.
A nanny who testified to Smith’s semiconscious state identified most of the photos and was seen posing with Smith. The prosecution responded with photos of a disheveled Smith sitting on a toilet holding her dog.
I wonder how the prosecution got their hands on those pictures.
Liann – you beat to it, I have the same article.
What’s the big deal about looking disheveled, sitting on a toliet holding her dog? I do that all the time.
Sammy1
Sammy1 [82] that’s funny.
Hm, was that the best the Prosecution could come up with to cover-up/hide the fact that one of their star witness’s lied as to what Anna’s demeanor was while they were working for her.
Liann and JMA – just the facts. Max follows me everywhere.
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=11637592
Jurors see slides of Anna Nicole Smith appearing healthy, happy after baby born
The Associated Press
By LINDA DEUTSCH AP Special Correspondent
LOS ANGELES September 14, 2010 (AP)
Jurors in the Anna Nicole Smith drug conspiracy case were shown a photo slide show Tuesday of Smith appearing healthy, active and involved with her baby during three months when a prosecution witness claimed she was drugged and barely able to function.
A defense attorney presented 90 pictures taken in late 2006, including some shot days after Smith gave birth to her daughter Dannielynn.
There were shots of Smith feeding and kissing the baby and posing with defendant Howard K. Stern and the baby in a family-style portrait.
Other images depicted a sun-splashed commitment ceremony with Stern in which Smith wore a wedding gown on a boat.
Nanny Quethlie Alexie previously testified that Smith was in a semiconscious state during the period when most of the photos were taken. Alexie was seen posing with Smith in some of pictures.
The prosecution responded to the slideshow by showing a few poor quality photos, including one of a disheveled-looking Smith lying in bed with what appeared to be a medicinal drip apparatus in her hand. Alexie said the picture was taken when Smith was sick and Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, another defendant, installed the device to give her serum.
Stern, Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor have pleaded not guilty to providing Smith with excessive opiates and sedatives. They are not charged with causing her overdose death in 2007.
Alexie previously testified she had signed two affidavits about the case in the Bahamas that were untrue.
With jurors dismissed from the courtroom several times, Superior Court Judge Robert Perry voiced his frustration with the witness and said, “The court sees serious credibility issues.”
“The state of the record is the witness is claiming to have signed two documents which are not accurate,” he said.
Perry also reiterated his previous concerns about the case.
“I think this is a very unfocused prosecution,” he said. “I have problems with the way the evidence is coming out.”
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
I have always thought that the nannies sounded like disgruntled ex-employees. Dose anyone know why they were let go?. TIA.
Lian, one nanny stated she was let go supposedly for breaking the washing machine. Another said for letting information out. Who knows for sure? FS hired the nannies.
Thanks Sammy1.
#88 Liann, you’re welcome dear.
Liann HKS said that information was leaking from Horizons. Rumor had it that FS was paying them for information.
You know it is bad when a Judge tells a defense lawyer to take a deep breath as the Judge is doing so that the Judge does NOT say something the Judge is going to regret. Also when you read this keep in MIND that an out of country witness that comes to the U. S. and Commits perjury can NOT be charged and tried for that here like a citizen can be tried for perjury (thus Ford Shelley changed HIS testimony probably because of that “I can be charged and tried”) the nannies cannot be charged and tried for that same thing.
Lawyer says witness lied at prosecutor’s urging
* LINDA DEUTSCH/None
* Originally published September 14, 2010 at 3:19 p.m., updated September 14, 2010 at 6:50 p.m.
LOS ANGELES (AP) – The lawyer for Howard K. Stern has asked a judge to strike a key witness’ entire testimony in the Anna Nicole Smith drug case claiming she committed perjury at the urging of the prosecutor.
Attorney Steve Sadow was red-faced with anger as he addressed the judge outside the jury’s presence Tuesday. He accused prosecutor Renee Rose of having “suborned perjury” by a former Nanny who worked for Smith.
Superior Court Judge Robert Perry, having dismissed jurors from the room, urged Sadow to take a deep breath and said he was restraining himself from making a statement he might regret. When Sadow later moved to strike the testimony of Nadine Alexie, he said, “I’m considering it.”
Court recessed for the day without a ruling.
http://www.victoriaadvocate.com/news/2010/sep/14/bc-us-anna-nicole-smith2nd-ld/?news&national-entertainment.
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/entertainment&id=7668056
another report of today
Thanks Grammy
Wonder how much longer ?????????
I hope the Prosecution must put them on a plane tonight and get their noncredible asses off the California’s taxpayers dime.
Sammy,
I bet not much longer at all!
Will the jury even deliberate on this nonsense that cannot be proven as fact?
I’d bet against that one!
OMG! Watching Rachel… she is showing clips of this Christine O’Donnell from the past.
My head lifted up to the TV when I heard the words; m*sterbation is a… WHAT?
WTH does that have to do with Politics?
Liann,
“..put them on a plane tonight and get their noncredible asses off the California’s taxpayers dime.”
Yes exactly Liann!
I am in shock still about the Blogger case getting this far, and just thought; corrupt courts and bought Judges in TX..
*But look what got sneaked through the prelim as fact and truth in CA!
What total BS!
Be well my cyberfriends!
38K to a google expert.. taxpayers dime..
Flying in Moe ( from Fla. I think) logging, meals and whatever he might have demanded.. ( contradicts statements and or testimony ). taxpayers dime..
Flying in Shelly, G. Ben (from S.C.) and whomever else came with them logging, meals and whatever they might have demanded. ( contradicts statements and recants testimony ). taxpayers dime ..
2 nannies, 1 paid for relocation 1st and last months rent and the whole 9 family members to come and upon arriving gets other bills paid back home, logging, meals and security, and they are NOT credible!. taxpayers dime. I wonder if they saw Britney Spears at Disneyland this last weekend.
What else???. This is such a farce !!!..
California citizens
Sorry, I didn’t finish. RRose. imo knew, and knowing and proceeding is her own fault imo..
Attorney Steve Sadow was red-faced with anger as he addressed the judge outside the jury’s presence Tuesday. He accused prosecutor Renee Rose of having “suborned perjury” by a former Nanny who worked for Smith.
Superior Court Judge Robert Perry, having dismissed jurors from the room, urged Sadow to take a deep breath and said he was restraining himself from making a statement he might regret. When Sadow later moved to strike the testimony of Nadine Alexie, he said, “I’m considering it.”
Court recessed for the day without a ruling.
Subornation of perjury is a legal term describing the crime of persuading another to commit perjury.[1
It may be applied to an attorney who presents testimony (or an affidavit) the attorney knows is materially false to a judge or jury as if it were factual. Generally, the knowledge that the testimony is materially false must rise above mere suspicion to what a reasonable attorney would have believed in the circumstances. For example, the attorney cannot be wilfully blind to the fact that their witness is giving false testimony. An attorney who actively encourages a witness to give false testimony is clearly guilty of suborning perjury. It can occur in either a civil and criminal case.
Subornation of perjury is a crime. It is also an offense for which an attorney can be disciplined, disbarred or jailed. Subornation is the circumstance where an attorney gets, or allows, another party to lie. If an attorney makes a false representation in court, that is also a crime and he could be subject to similar punishment as subornation.
Beth, I’m also watching Rachel – I cannot believe how We The People can vote for and allow candidates with such records obtain the right to run for higher office. That guy Carl Paladino won the Republican candidacy for New York Governor. This is the same guy who emailed nasty cartoons to others concerning our first African American President. Here’s hoping Cuno has enough Democratic support to beat Paladino. The RNSC has just announced they will not financially support Christine O’Donnell of Delaware for Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. You know the candidate is bad if the RNSC won’t support. Please help us all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i17A4FXTLhJX10-sCbhhnhdqY9HwD9I82E6G0
Lawyer: Smith case prosecutor encouraged perjury
By LINDA DEUTSCH (AP) – 2 hours ago
LOS ANGELES — Howard K. Stern’s lawyer angrily accused a prosecutor Tuesday of encouraging perjury by a key witness at the Anna Nicole Smith drug conspiracy trial.
Defense attorney Steve Sadow was red-faced as he asked the judge to strike the entire testimony of Nadine Alexie, a former nanny for Smith.
“I’m considering it,” Superior Court Judge Robert Perry said without making a ruling.
The dispute involved testimony by Nadine Alexie that she had taught her sister-in-law Quethlie Alexie to recognize Stern’s name on prescription bottles, even though Quethlie Alexie reads no English.
Sadow suggested prosecutor Renee Rose had encouraged Nadine Alexie to fabricate the story to explain her sister-in law’s statements on the witness stand that she had seen Stern’s name on the bottles.
When the judge left the bench, Sadow shouted at Rose: “In my whole career I’ve never seen a prosecutor do a stunt like that. You ought to look in the mirror and think about what you’re doing. It’s outrageous.”
Rose did not respond to the accusation.
Asked later if Rose would have a comment, district attorney’s spokeswoman Sandi Gibbons said, “Whatever statement she has she will be making in court.”
Before Sadow spoke, Perry dismissed jurors from the courtroom and appeared to predict what Sadow was going to say.
“Let’s take a deep breath before we go on,” Perry said. “I don’t want to say something I will regret, so I’m not saying anything.”
He urged Sadow to consider doing the same, but the lawyer said he felt he had to speak.
“That was suborned perjury,” Sadow said, using the legal term for encouraging a witness to lie. “The people know this is perjurious testimony.”
The uproar came after former nanny Quethlie Alexie concluded three days on the witness stand. Under questioning by defense lawyer Brad Brunon about her literacy in English, Quethlie said through a Creole interpreter that she could not read or write English, even though she could speak it.
Brunon took her through an English language affidavit she had signed trying to determine her skill. She said she couldn’t read the document but had signed it anyway after it was read to her.
Earlier, she had testified she saw pill bottles of medicine in Smith’s home and read Stern’s name on many of them.
When Nadine Alexie took the witness stand later, Rose asked how Quethlie was able to read Stern’s name on the bottles. Nadine said she began teaching Quethlie how to read and write English after they went to work for Smith.
She said she specifically showed her Stern’s name and told her how to read and write it “so if she saw things in his name she would know who they belonged to.”
Nadine Alexie said she went through two years of college and reads and writes English perfectly. But she insisted she did not read a one-page legal affidavit attesting to her sister’s truthfulness before she signed it.
“I just didn’t read it,” she said.
“So you’re in a lawyer’s office with a notary public and they ask you to sign a document and you don’t read it?” Brunon asked.
“I didn’t read it,” Nadine Alexie said with a shrug but no explanation.
There has been confusion about the two women’s surnames. Both were originally given as Alexie, but Quethlie later said her surname was Alexis, which is how she signed the affidavit.
Stern, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor have pleaded not guilty to providing Smith with excessive opiates and sedatives. They are not charged with causing her overdose death in 2007.
The complaint by Sadow capped a day that began with jurors seeing a slide slow of 90 images of the former Playboy model appearing healthy, active and involved with her baby during the three months that Quethlie claimed she was drugged and barely able to function.
Sadow presented the pictures taken in late 2006, including some shot days after Smith gave birth to her daughter Dannielynn.
There were shots of Smith feeding and kissing the baby and posing with Stern and the baby in a family-style portrait.
Other images depicted a sun-splashed commitment ceremony with Stern in which Smith wore a wedding gown on a boat.
Quethlie Alexie previously testified that Smith was in a semiconscious state during the period when most of the photos were taken.
The prosecution responded to the slideshow by showing a few poor quality photos, including one of a disheveled-looking Smith lying in bed with what appeared to be a medicinal drip apparatus in her hand.
Quethlie Alexie testified the picture was taken when Smith was sick and Eroshevich installed the device to give her serum.
The witness also said she had signed two affidavits about the case in the Bahamas that were untrue.
With jurors dismissed from the courtroom several times, Judge Perry voiced his frustration with the witness and said, “The court sees serious credibility issues.”
Perry also reiterated his previous concerns about the case.
“I think this is a very unfocused prosecution,” he said. “I have problems with the way the evidence is coming out.”
Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Sammy1 [100] Did you hear what Paladinut said he wanted to do with the poor inner city people? Turn old jails into “welfare camps” and put poor people in there.
Yes Ken, I did. We the thinking for ourselves people must get out the vote come November. This is frightening to everyone. I blame McCain foremost.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/09/15/california.anna.nicole.trial/
Defense: Anna Nicole Smith case prosecutor encouraged perjuryBy Alan Duke, CNNSeptember 15, 2010 2:23 a.m. EDT
Los Angeles, California (CNN) — The judge is considering striking the testimony of a key witness in the Anna Nicole Smith drug trial after a defense lawyer accused the prosecution of “suborning perjury” — coaching the witness to lie.
“I am thinking about it,” Judge Robert Perry said Tuesday.
It would be a major blow to an already staggered prosecution case against Smith’s boyfriend-lawyer Howard K. Stern and Drs. Khristine Eroshevich and Sandeep Kapoor. They are accused conspiring to provide drugs to an addict and using false names on prescriptions for Smith.
“The People (prosecution) know this is fraudulent,” defense attorney Steve Sadow said at the end of the direct testimony of Nadine Alexie.
Alexie and her sister-in-law, Quethelie Alexis, worked for Smith in the Bahamas for several months after the birth of her daughter in September 2006. They were fired two months before Smith died in a Florida hotel in February 2007.
Judge Perry acknowledged a problem and advised Sadow to “take a deep breath.”
“I think we just have to think about this thing,” Perry said. “Just remarkable.” The judge said he would not comment further because he might say something “I would regret.”
The dramatic exchange came at the end of Alexie’s direct testimony, when prosecutor Renee Rose asked if she taught Quethelie Alexis, her sister-in-law, how to recognize any written words. She said she had taught Alexis, the other nanny to testify, how to read Howard K. Stern’s name.
This is significant because the defense questioned how Alexis, who is illiterate, was able to read Stern’s name on prescription bottles as she had testified.
“That is suborning perjury… It’s outrageous and should not be tolerated,” Sadow told the judge.
Sadow’s attack on prosecutor Rose’s credibility grew more angry and personal when the judge left the courtroom for a recess.
“In my whole career, I’ve never seen a prosecutor pull a stunt like that,” Sadow said, pointing toward Rose who was still seated at her table. “You ought to take a look in a mirror and figure out what you’re doing. It’s outrageous.”
Rose sat silently looking away from Sadow.
When court resumed a few minutes later, Sadow asked the judge to strike Alexie’s entire testimony from the record — and order the jury to ignore it. Perry said he would not do that yet, “but I am thinking about it.”
Judge Perry had already ordered part of the Quethelie Alexis’ testimony stricken from the record after he said he found it unreliable last week.
The two nannies, both Haitians who live in the Bahamas, were supposed to be star witnesses for the prosecution. But each has recanted key portions of affidavits they signed concerning Smith’s drug use when she lived in the Bahamas in the last months of her life.
The defense has also highlighted the financial benefits the Los Angeles District Attorney has given the women in order to convince them to fly to the United States to testify.
Both women testified that they have been promised two months rent, utility payments and moving expenses so they can move into new homes when they return to the Bahamas after their testimony.
“I tell them (if) I come to testify I’m going to need to move from where I am,” Nadine Alexie said Tuesday. She said the publicity surrounding her testimony would make it dangerous for her to remain in her current home.
The prosecution not only paid for the two witnesses to travel to Los Angeles, but they were allowed to bring seven other family members at taxpayer expense.
“I tell them I would not leave my family behind,” Alexie said. A nephew tagged along with her three children and her husband. Quethelie Alexis brought her two children with her.
Prosecutor Rose worked to convince jurors that the taxpayer-funded trip has been no luxury vacation, given as a reward for testimony.
The children have not been taken to Disneyland or even a movie in the eight days they’ve been staying in a Los Angeles hotel, Alexie testified. They’ve stuck close to the hotel watching television and swimming in the pool, Alexie said. The only outing was for two hours to a “little park” on Sunday, she testified.
The trial is in its seventh week and could extend into October, lawyers said.
Judge Perry has suggested several times in recent weeks that the prosecution had fallen short so far in proving the core of its case, including that Smith was a drug addict.
The defense contends that Smith suffered chronic pain, justifying the drug prescriptions in question.
“If she’s being treated for pain, it’s not illegal,” Judge Perry said Tuesday.
Good Morning—JOHN—There has been a question on my mind,that is bothering me,WHY? with all the information you express to have knowledge of,were you not called by the prosecution or defense.
Good morning Beverly the nannies only care about the big dollar they do not care about the truth .For me is the one who protect the people the DA ,JB they do not care about puting people in jail for nothing they did so help me God.
Morning…
I just saw a short bit on HLN regarding the Judge may strike the nannies testimony.
The only national news on this trial has mostly been against the prosecution!
Thanks for the links Sammy dear!
Also good morning to Pixiesmom, Beverly and Ken!
I believe that is all so far posting today…
Have a great day!
Good morning Beth and every one in Rose speaks.
It really amazes me what some people post regarding the CA court case and in how they believe that the prosecution is doing a wonderful job and that there will be three convictions. (Doesn’t matter what is being said in the media apparently) But if there are no convictions you will read how the judge was biased, CA legal system was corrupt….. blah blah blah blah. Apparently they are not reading the same reports that I have been reading.
John, while you were in court for the ninnies testimony, was virgie there?
#109 DG – It’s nothing out of the ordinary. It’s exactly what they have done with each and every case. Same senario over and over. The same song hung up on repeat.
110. Like a scratch on an old 45 record….
#111 DG – Exactly!!!!!!! LOL LOL LOL
OMG !!!!!!!!!!!!
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=11646662
Anna Nicole Smith Nanny Says Movie Inspired Claim
Nanny witness in Anna Nicole Smith case testifies she made melted-drug claim based on TV movie
The Associated Press
By LINDA DEUTSCH AP Special Correspondent
LOS ANGELES September 15, 2010 (AP)
A nanny whose credibility has come under defense attack in the Anna Nicole Smith drug trial says she got the idea from a movie to claim she saw two defendants melt pills in a spoon and inject them into the former Playboy model.
Nadine Alexie testified Wednesday she saw a spoon being taken into a bathroom with Smith but did not see any drugs being melted or injected by defendants Howard K. Stern or Khristine Eroshevich.
She was asked by Eroshevich’s lawyer, Brad Brunon, if she told police in the Bahamas that she got the idea from a movie. She confirmed she saw it on TV.
Stern, Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor have pleaded not guilty to giving Smith excessive opiates and sedatives.
Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
I wonder Nanny N and Big Moe watched the same TV movie?
#114 Glenna – Can you believe this crap??? UNBELIEVEABLE !!!!!!!!!!!!
http://bearingdrift.com/2010/09/13/nominating-christine-o%E2%80%99donnell-de-could-destroy-the-tea-party/
Personal knowledge of Christine O’Donnell
Hey Sammy,
That makes me hopping MAD!
So, did Moe elaborate on one of the nannies’ lies? I would bet $ he did!
LOL Bet they don’t get first and last month’s rent now!
Well, there is really nothing funny about this horrible travesty!
The Judge better not let the prosecution continue to try and tell the jury these lies from the nannies, SC, and TX!
Wow Sammy! Thanks for that link!
OMG! Can you imagine if she becomes a Senator along with that Al Green?
What is our great country coming to?
Wait don’t answer that… the answer is too depressing!
Rose is about to load up some paperwork and the celebration is about to begin shortly there after.
IT’S OVER!!!! IT’S OVER!!!! IT’S OVER!!!! IT’S OVER!!!!
Last 3 defendants non-suited (w/o prejudice)
What wonderful news. CONGRATULATIONS !!!!!!!!!!
IT IS OVER IT IS OVER AND NOW AFTER THREE LONG YEARS LIFE BEGINS. We thank the people of this blog who stuck with us and looked past the spin, we thank the Topix VA posters because without them the free advertisement that has sustain our readership on other cases would not be possible, IT IS OVER REALLY OVER. And we have some new and exciting announcements coming up this week for all of you and the site, let the celebrations BEGIN!!!!
September 15, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s Motion to Non suit WITHOUT PREJUDICE (this is without prejudice because it does not say “With Prejudice” as the other non-suited defendants has stated; but hey will take it as is, the three remaining Defendant Pro Se and to DISMISS THE CASE. I don’t see any of us asking that this Motion be denied do y’all??
http://www.rosespeaks.com/downloads/ANS/Texas/9-15-10-Arthur-Notice-Nonsuit-Motion-Dismiss-Case.pdf
DG [109] yeah when ever I want to start my day with a little comic relief, I read those comments
To late, already being said the Judge along with those who are reporting on the trial are bias.
Oh and according to MB, VA is supposedly home in Texas!
Where does it say Without Prejudice?
Sammy1 [113] when I read where the nanny got the drugs being melted on a spoon, I bout fell over.
Lizzie, it would’ve said “with prejudice” (like the other ones) if they wanted it done ‘with prejudice’. Basically, if they don’t ask for it to be “with prejudice”, it’s w/o prejudice.
Wish I knew how to do all those cute little things on the bottom here….I would put up “Rose Rocks!” That is great news. All the misery McCabe put everyone through, all the time and money and then it’s over. If anyone asked you what this was all about, would you have an answer? I sure don’t. It never made any sense to me. Just so glad it’s done!
however, even w/o prejudice, we don’t see it being reinstated.
YEA it’s over
Must be a sad day
for all those nutcase VAS 
Kiah [130] just click on the one that you want then click into the reply box and once you hit submit it will show up
So … after all that money spent on defending against nothing but bullshit, all the worry caused, all the accusations and nastiness … McCabe and VA just get to walk away as if nothing happened.
JMA [133] We gotta give credit where it’s due,
though they maybe. Whether they like it or not, they did help push traffic to the site here, giving us more hits and pagereads (yeah, all those 
no matter how much they “warned” about our site, they kept reading), putting more spotlight on us, thereby having more people coming over and seeing what we are all about. (a lil hint y’all 
over there….the more you talk about a site, the more people gonna want to check it out. duh. 
) 
The new doc is not coming up. Maybe too many others are reading it.
Well that is great news for you all. Thank God. Too bad it cost so much in defending such bullshit.
Holy Shit! The nanny said she got the idea form a freaking movie? OMG!
Sammy, there is a run on the doc, but rose just emailed it to ya.
LIZZIE—-Trust me,Vergie and McCabe can NEVER,NEVER repair the damage done to Vergie reputation,unlike trying to blame everyone,they now have to FACE WHAT DAMAGE TO VERGIE REPUTATION THEY CAUSED.Anyone that did not believe Anna before,has seen for themselfs,what made Anna estranged from her mother and family.I will say LARRY BE CAREFUL,A SNAKE never changes.
Is anyone else having problems dl the latest doc?
REPOST REGARDING THIS LAST DOWNLOAD:
___________________________________________________
“Paperwork doesn’t say ‘without’ prejudice.
The case is dismissed.
Posted at 2:55 PM on Sep 15, 2010 by Howard Supporter”
___________________________________________________
Ken and Rose, thank you, I’m looking forward to the email. Again, Congratulations !!!! It’s about time !!!!!
I didn’t have a problem with it, Ken.
142, just had to get a dig in, didn’t you? You couldn’t have just said “great” and left it at that, could you?
Thanks Ken!
Ken [136] yeah how clueless the more they ridiculed this site the more interest it would spark;
I guess maybe I too should give credit where credit is due cause if it wasn’t for those Vile Troll’s bringing up this site over at TMZ I may not have never known about here either and with that I say…THANK YOU
Thanks Ken!
Congrats to Rose and all the others who were involved in this farce of a case….Most of us knew the truth, that Vergie wasn’t defamed…I just feel really bad for all the time and money and anquish that you all had to go thru because of Vergie….And for the fact that 2 of the bloggers ended up in jail, makes my blood boil….But thankfully it’s over…
May God Bless you all and keep you safe…
I do think it is GREAT this FAKE CASE has been SHOWN TO BE FAKE!
I feel so bad for the ones who had to spend money on lawyers for this fake case!
No digs here Mr. Ken…
I still do believe nobody should have helped McC destroy anyone…
I am very happy that it is dismissed.
Beth, believe whatever helps you sleep at night.
Great News on the bright side we all have recieved a valuable lesson. Here’s hoping that karma returns the favor to those that deserve it!
btw, with all the other stuf going on, we forgot to mention that there is someone in court today for us.
Link to Radaronline – has the photos shown in court.
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2010/09/exclusive-photos-disprove-anna-nicole-smith-was-drug-addict-court-claims-see
Beth
Here’s another Christine O. Read her view on Healthcare.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-cohen/christine-odonnell-and-me_b_718593.html
Thank you much Miss Sammy!
I put both of those links in favorites and hope to look at them after supper…
REPOST ON INFO REGARDING LAST DOWNLOAD
_____________________________________________________________
“The ‘bloggers’ suit has an inadequate Motion for non-suit.
It does not state with or without prejudice and must be adjusted to say ‘with prejudice’.
VA cannot be trusted and McCabe has had a psychotic break apparently.
DDARose should be charged criminally, along with Agent Santiago and those who fed them
the false information used to persecute HKS/K/E. This must not be allowed to stand.
Posted at 4:04 PM on Sep 15, 2010 by Only swim in the Ocean”
_____________________________________________________________
* A letter to the clerk to have the plaintiff and her lawyer CLARIFY might be well worth worrying about anything coming up later…
It’s up to you, I am sure BS is relieved to be able to finally finish her stuff in CA in the other Court…
report from today with video
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/entertainment&id=7670284
LOS ANGELES (KABC) — Defense lawyers in the Anna Nicole Smith trial on Wednesday attacked the credibility of the model’s former nannies. One has been accused of being encouraged to lie by the prosecution.
Quethlie Alexis testified that she could neither read nor write English, but said she saw bottles of medication Smith took that had the name Howard K. Stern on them.
When defense attorneys quizzed her by putting the name up on a big screen, Alexis said she couldn’t read anything.
Alexis’ sister-in-law, Nadine Alexis, testified that she had taught her how to read and write Stern’s name.
Outside the presence of the jury, the defense accused the prosecution of encouraging Nadine Alexis to lie.
She said she was not coached and added that someone else read the prescription bottle and told Quethlie Alexie what was on it.
Stern, Eroshevich and Dr. Sandeep Kapoor have pleaded not guilty to providing Smith excessive opiates and sedatives. They are not charged with causing her death in 2007.
Nadine Alexis went on to testify that a movie inspired her previous claim that she saw two defendants melt pills in a spoon and inject Smith with the liquid. She said she saw a spoon being taken into a bathroom with Smith but did not see any drugs being melted or injected by Stern or Eroshevich.
Related Content
Story: Jurors shown photos of Smith before her death
Story: Key testimony in Anna Nicole trial questioned
Story: Judge questions 2 charges in Smith trial
Story: New video shown at Anna Nicole drug trial
Story: Video shows Smith denying drug use at show
more: Entertainment video, exclusive interviews
otrc: More entertainment at OnTheRedCarpet.com
“Did you tell police you got the idea of melting pills from a movie you’d seen?” Eroshevich’s lawyer Brad Brunon asked.
“Yes,” she said. “I saw that on TV.”
The defense also showed more photos to jurors. The 92 photos of Smith presented show her seemingly healthy and playing with her baby, embracing her lawyer-boyfriend Stern and going on a fishing trip.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
(Copyright ©2010 KABC-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)
LOS ANGELES (KABC) — Defense lawyers in the Anna Nicole Smith trial on Wednesday attacked the credibility of the model’s former nannies. One has been accused of being encouraged to lie by the prosecution.
Quethlie Alexis testified that she could neither read nor write English, but said she saw bottles of medication Smith took that had the name Howard K. Stern on them.
When defense attorneys quizzed her by putting the name up on a big screen, Alexis said she couldn’t read anything.
Alexis’ sister-in-law, Nadine Alexis, testified that she had taught her how to read and write Stern’s name.
Outside the presence of the jury, the defense accused the prosecution of encouraging Nadine Alexis to lie.
She said she was not coached and added that someone else read the prescription bottle and told Quethlie Alexie what was on it.
Hell, If I were RRose I would want their testimony stricken
This has been the cyber-worlds first “Legal Reality Show” Screenwriters: The O’Quinn Law Firm.
.
Brought to you as a public service by Rose & Ken Turner and RoseSpeaks.
.
Words cannot express how happy I am for all of you..I’m so glad this is over…and just wish that Judge Perry would
dismiss this other crazy faris that is going on in California.
From the bottom of my heart..I wish you good Health….. now that you don’t have this, hanging over you.
So with that I will just say…
in you and the Site.
Congrats to all the defendants and it’s about time! I did learn how to try to comprehend legal papers and without McCabes numerous filings and Rose/Ken’s generosity of posting them, I would not be so informed. Too bad that it had to take these actions tho for that to happen. I started out by saying that I hope the ones that perpetuated this madness, sleep well at night. I still wish the same.
And I agree with Raven #161
News from link.
After Alexie left the witness stand, prosecutors called sheriff’s computer expert Melinda Clark to identify photographs found in the hard drive of Smith’s computers at her Bahamas home after her death.
The prosecution offered the photos to bolster their claim that Eroshevich crossed the line between being Smith’s psychiatrist and her friend when she prescribed medications for Smith.
Two pictures shown to jurors depicted Smith and Eroshevich naked in a bathtub together. The judge had a black box placed over intimate parts of their bodies.
In one photo, the women are hugging and smiling for the camera. The second picture was difficult to see because of lighting.
There have been no indications of a sexual relationship between the women, and the judge previously characterized the photos as appearing playful.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/09/15/ap/celebrities/main6869646.shtml
I agree with both raven and Bewildered.Just glad to see it ended
That said Ken I do not think Beth made a dig at all she just showed someone elses post and even though this is over Some posters are right can ya really trust VA and McShame and what they might try and use you guys for in the future??????
Melt down on isle three..
, This is so funny 
they are 
over at the pit 
Sorry this is your day and our day being supporters.
CNN Alan Duke
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/09/15/california.anna.nicole.trial/index.html
Nanny denies prosecution coaching in Anna Nicole Smith trialBy Alan Duke, CNNSeptember 15, 2010 10:54 p.m. EDT
I was going tocopy and paste the article but decided against it because CNN has pictures that were displayed in court. Ladies, some of the photos are new to us. You need to see.
I was listening to old songs and since Governor moonbeam is the one that got the california case going or at least followed thru after contacted by(IMO) the dark side I Looked up htis. She sounds very good sorry about being off topic http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FiKHaSRMeg&feature=related
Rose and Ken how pleased I am at the great news….later I probably will wonder why put everyone through all this and the cost both financially and mentally, not to mention the affect on Roses health….
but for today….enjoy….
But for what it is worth who would pay for another court case to win what????
ok I am travelling and am only able to check in, but I am in contact with Rose twice a day as I promised her I would do…..so much going on here to be away…
SOMEONE EXPLAIN WHY I WAS PUT IN MODERATION AND MY COMMENTS DISSAPPEARED/
172. I have no idea, I don’t moderate the blog.
But to add to that, I sometimes placed in moderation also.
Beverly [172] Most likely it got moderated (by the software, not by any person) because of a word you mentioned. Most likely when you mentioned ‘advice’, since v*ce is on the list of words to moderate (due to the person of that name) and this software (which is part of the blog) is such an annal pita that no mater what the word you put, if you put those four letters together, even in the middle of another word, it will moderate it.
IMO the ones responsible for the Texas suit even getting off the ground and taking flight are QV & Havanna and IMO the one solely responsible for the Texas suit’s crash landing was VA [contract with Splash/David Leigh] which left McCabe no choice but to ground/scratch the entire mission.
END of Story…DONE!
DG [174] bet you got/get nice accommodations while in there…Ken never gives me anything when I ended up there, I think he’s bias
Just kidding Ken, or am I
I must say that I am not surprised at the words that are being said at Topix since the blogger case is now over and it looks like soon the CA case against Stern and others will be over.
I have read where some have wished harm to innocent children and it sickens me to know that I have posted with some people that are so vile and so full of hate that they won’t even consider the possibilty that they were a tool to be used by a certain law firm. You were played, the sooner you realize that the better off you will be. There is no halo shining brighly above virgie’s head. That law firm used everyone that they could and some refuse to see it. And we wonder what is wrong with todays children… wow. If some of the “adults’ that have been posting their horrible wishes are any influence over today’s youth, we as a nation are doomed. If you believe that it is a morally right thing to do to wish harm on innocent children, then you need some serious help.
If a court case does not go the way you want to, then the judge is crooked. I doubt that Perry will be overturned on any ruling that he makes. However the same cannot be said about the judge in Texas that granted every little whim that was filed for by McCabe.
It really is something to witness. I only hope that people would have learned something out of all of this. Sadly they have not.
Congrats to Rose and Ken and good luck .DG I liked what you wrote .
JMA [177] sure you are. Here, have a
. You deserve it. 
Back atcha Cheers
DG [178] BRAVO
well said and so true.
My message to the not so Almighty Queen, now is your time to just F.O.C.U.S and I’m quite sure that is not just my opinion!
DG and JMA
Same goes. This country is being torn apart by the hateful rhetoric brought forth by everyone.I wish everyone would put a little love in their hearts!!!!!!
#183 hmm – yes, there is much too much hateful rhetoric going on and to think so much of it is coming from hopeful politicians, politicians in office, rude radio/tv media and spiteful bloggers. Frightening isn’t it? Where will it end?
Time to pick up Max from the groomer. Later ladies.
KABC7 news just said that defense atty reprimanded by Judge, The Judge said he was disappointed that the defense for Dr. Sandeep Kapoor failed to turn over important notes to the prosecution, notes involved testimony of a expert witness who was prepared to say that the medication Dr. Kapoor prescribed to ANS were appropriate.
~~ I don’t see how the Judge saying he is disappointed is a reprimand ~~
Liann, it’s just dressing to make it sound more catchy. You know how reporters are. If they just reported the story as is…any story…that would be boring. They gotta toss in stuff to try to catch peoples attention.
I know Ken, I wish the media would just report facts and not add
You know, if this is something that he should have turned over to the prosecution, then he should get reprimanded by the judge. But let me also say that he isn’t the first lawyer not to play by all of the rules that have been involved in this saga.
I just watched ABC7 4:00 p.m. news and they say possible dismissal of some of the charges due to expert witness testimony today, It was alot longer report then this morning, I hope at 5:00 they post it on their website with video they interviewed a Dr. Perry Fine who was the expert. Dr. Perry Fine President elect of the American Academy of pain management and advisor for Medical Boards across the nation
They are/were reading some pain management act and Judge Perry is quoted as saying the reporter said, (The more I read this the more difficult it is to proceed in this case as a criminal prosecution.)
~~ I think I got that right~~
Oh, I did get it right and they also spoke about Dr. E. I hope they post of the report soon
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/entertainment&id=7672471
Miriam Hernandez
More: Bio, E-mail, Recent Stories, News Team
LOS ANGELES (KABC) — A startling photo and expert testimony from a pain management expert marked a series of new developments in the Anna Nicole Smith drug conspiracy trial.
There were strong suggestions from the judge Thursday that some charges may be dismissed. This comes with testimony from an expert witness going to heart of the case: How much medication is too much?
Anna Nicole Smith complained of pain in her back, her legs, her abdomen. How bad was it? How does a doctor determine pain levels?
“There is no objective test, no laboratory test, no imaging study that can be used to determine either the presence or absence of pain, or intensity of pain,” said Dr. Perry Fine, an expert witness in the trial.
Fine is president-elect of the American Academy of Pain Management, an advisor for medical boards across the nation.
Fine’s testimony defends Smith’s doctor, Sandeep Kapoor. The internist prescribed high doses of sedatives and pain medication for Smith.
Now, along with two codefendants, he faces six felony counts for supplying excessive medication to an addict.
Related Content
Story: Smith defense: Witness allegedly coached to lie
Story: Jurors shown photos of Smith before her death
Story: Key testimony in Anna Nicole trial questioned
Story: Judge questions 2 charges in Smith trial
Story: New video shown at Anna Nicole drug trial
Story: Video shows Smith denying drug use at show
more: Entertainment video, exclusive interviews
otrc: More entertainment at OnTheRedCarpet.com
Yet Fine says some patients need a lot of drugs for pain treatment.
“It is hugely variable,” said Fine. “There is tremendous variation from one individual to another, even up to 50, even 100 times in some circumstances.”
That assertion is part of the California Medical Board’s standard of care.
Outside the presence of the jury, the judge referred to the document from the state legislature. It says that the California Intractable Pain Treatment Act was created to protect physicians from being disciplined solely because of the amount of controlled substances prescribed. It called some terms of the act outdated and confusing.
“The more I read this, the more difficult it is to proceed in this case as a criminal prosecution,” the judge in the case said Thursday.
As he plans hearings to review the matter, the court released photos of Smith that raise another issue about medical standards. The photos depict psychiatrist Dr. Khristine Eroshevich in a whirlpool tub with Smith.
The prosecution says it shows a violation of professional boundaries. Eroshevich’s defense attorney says it happened when Smith was suffering from mood swings, and that it was innocent play.
Prosecutors are not alleging a sexual relationship.
More is expected about the possible dismissal of some of those charges in the coming weeks.
(Copyright ©2010 KABC-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)
I think we all have been saying how does one control pain and how does a doctor gauge a patients pain. I feel so sorry for DDA Rose. She got handed a loser of a case and they knew it when they handed it to her. Dic*heads.
Liann, thank you for the link. Did you notice the artist rendering of the judge? Judge looks either bored or frustrated.
Update on SC Case
1179.
SC Case Update: 9-16-10
“Docket Text: TEXT ORDER. The parties are directed to file a status report on [79] First MOTION for Contempt; First MOTION for Sanctions, by Wednesday, September 22, 2010. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 09/16/2010. (dsto, )”
So much for SB’s two-bites-at-the-apple argument: SB says essentially in her Motion to Dismiss that she should be not be a defendant in the case itself if HKS/Wood want to proceed with separate contempt allegations and request for sanctions based on her actions as an Attorney. After all, in SB’s mind she complied with Court orders as best she understood them and all this talk of being a moving force in a civil conspiracy (and computer crimes with McCabe) is just crazy.
News for SB: the many allegations against you are not mutually exclusive. You lost the Attorney-Client privilege long ago due to the crime-fraud exception. Step up and admit your guilt; the TX cabal can now longer help nor harm you.
Posted at 4:55 PM on Sep 16, 2010 by Only swim in the Ocean
Thanks Liann for the article update!
Thank you Sammy,
I hadn’t looked there today!
Another article on CA case:
http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978523350
Did Prosecutor in Anna Nicole Smith Trial Coach Nanny?
September 16, 2010 10:49 AM EDT (Updated: September 16, 2010 10:58 AM EDT)
“The defense is accusing the prosecutor in the Anna Nicole Smith trial of coaching the nanny of Smith’s infant daughter. The nanny in question denies the allegations. The trial is getting ugly as the judge allowed the release of photos of Anna Nicole with her daughter and boyfriend Howard K. Stern. The purpose was to show how happy and healthy Smith looked. The defense claims she used drugs during much of her last months of life, but the prosecutor wants the blame to fall on Stern.
“The trial, in its seventh week, took a dramatic turn Wednesday when defense attorney Steve Sadow accused prosecutor Renee Rose of knowingly having Nadine Alexie, a former Smith nanny, lie on the stand,” according to CNN.
The judge is considering striking the nanny’s testimony, and that would be huge blow to the prosecution. The prosecutors are trying to prove that Smith was given drugs that led to her death. The nanny is a key witness for the prosecution, and if the judge throws out her testimony, the case may be lost.
Stern may actually walk after one of the nannies recanted her story that Stern melted pills into Anna Nicole’s soup, and then, injected Smith with the melted pill and soup mixture.
It just doesn’t ring true, and the prosecution is floundering. The nanny has lied before, and her credibility is low with the court. So Howard K. Stern is looking pretty good right now. How do feel about this? The judge is not buying what the prosecution is selling.”
Sammy1 #195, I did
, IMO I think the prosecution is 
about now.
Hi Beth
Look, I don’t think any of this is funny, I think this case never should have gotten to trial court imo, I think it is such BS for the Prosecution to act so inept and they had so so much time to investigate everyone of their witnesses and they proceeded with them anyways, I do feel sorry for many in this case but the Prosecution I have no pity for at all!, all they seem to have done so far is waste so much of the taxpayers money and California is on the brink of disaster financially and this BS was all for Jerry Brown’s political gain.
New lead in to new JN article now up
#200 Liann – Wonder how much California has spent since the investigation began 2 months after Anna’s death. So many lawsuits for one man to experience in a matter of 3 years and for what reason – false accusations, lies for money or for anger and hate. After this case is dropped, there will be a civil case until the court decides that VA is not the next of kin and then maybe HKS can get some peace knowing he kept his promise to Anna. The truth that they knew.
Sammy1, I could not agree more. Howard did and has kept his promise. The truth as they knew. Every lawsuit Howard engaged in and all BS thrown his way he has never wavered and that alone imo deserves respect. I don’t understand all the ugly. I concur Howard did enable Anna ( whatever one wants to depict enable as) I think Anna was no saint by no means but all this and every lawsuit had a reason and all leads back to the firm imo and Howard defended himself and Anna in every case and I think this is not done for him. I pray one day the ugly goes away and maybe some or most of it has this last week imo
I can’t wait for S.C case, This is going to be the case that all truth is known imo.
Sammy1 I certainly hope so also..Maybe the whole Stern family along with LB and DL can have some peace when this is over along with the SC case.