Latest filings in all things Anna Nicole Smith
Posted by Rose in All Things Anna Nicole Smith, Amanda Bush, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith's Will, Art Harris, Art Harris Exclusive, Art Harris Scoop, Bald Truth Exclusive, Bonnie Stern, Bryan Cave LLP, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Chip Babcock, Dannielynn, Debunking the myths on ALL cases related to Anna Nicole, Diana Marshall, Harry Susman, Harvey Levin, High Proflie Trials, Howard K Stern, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Nancy Hamilton, Neil McCabe, Rose Speaks, Rose Turner, Susman and Godfrey, The O'Quinn Law Firm, TMZ, TMZ.com, Virgie Arthur
July 1, 2010 First Court of Appeals issued a new opinion, denied Arthur’s request for a rehearing, corrected the original opinion issued in April 2010. The court has granted Harris Motion for Mandamus for the three Orders to Compel. It appears to me on first glance that the Court has now extended In Re. Weekley Homes to cover appointing a Special Master in cases such as this. Which IMO is good and should continue to be expanded in Texas.
July 1, 2010 Virgie Arthur’s SurReply with exhibits attached to Howard K Stern’s’ Motion to Quash and for a Protective Order, the Reply says Stern had been served with the new lawsuit but has not reply… I think and would have to look it up that he has 21 days to reply and if the information that Arthur is depending on says he was served on June 18 then I think his answer is not due until July 9 (21 days later). It does have an interesting implication on the Cosby lawsuit settlement.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit A filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit B filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit C filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit D filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit E filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit F filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit G filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit H filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit I filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Exhibit J filed with Motion to Compel Virgie Arthur to produce documents in relation to discovery.
July 1, 2010 Art Harris Notice of SUBMISSION ONLY OF THIS MOTION FOR JULY 12, MOTIONS TO COMPEL ALWAYS HAVE TO BE SET FOR A HEARING. One has to wonder why Harris’ attorneys wanted all of this up for the public once again right before a long holiday weekend.
A brief few comments, lawyers can put anything they want to in a filing even if they know it is false at the time. They are covered by judicial immunity with filings and in a courtroom as just gamesmanship and being a fierce advocate for their client.
Ms. Hamilton is well aware of the truth and what she is saying here is out and out BS.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Some of the defendants need to say “Ms. Turner was honest 2 years ago and she is honest in this deposition”, and obviously it is in Art Harris’ best interest to say Ken and I have been paid off, that Ken is an “email drop” for communications between Virgie Arthur, her family lawyers etc. when the deposition clearly shows I have never had any communication with any of the main parties in this lawsuit except for Larry Birkhead. I remember at the beginning of these lawsuits the Plaintiff’s attorney accused Ken of being an “email drop” only for the evidence to show how false that was. However we are merely collateral damage in this free for all it appears.
Our bank account sure does not reflect any payoffs or bribes Ken and I have received and the whole deposition as Lin Wood said in a filing will show something completely different. That goes double for what Jackson and Walker feels the need to say about Ken and me right now.
Some times the best defense if your client is in trouble is to go on a strong offense against another party and call it just “advocating”, sadly lawyers do not have to prove things they say in filings, nor can the person being defamed and once again being accused of illegal activities have any recourse for an attorney doing just that.
Like I have said before Mr. Babcock and his wife, Ms. Hamilton, wear the hire gun label with pride, it is all about business and little about truth.
I have redacted those things said that should be covered by the Agreed Protective Order AGAIN, as I have redacted personal information of witnesses and parties to this suit. Ken and I would never want someone else to go through what we have since our address and phone number was made public over 2 years ago. That said, we can not do anything about Harris’ counsel filing this as pubic information on the Harris County Clerk of Court website.
Be sure to participate in our MEMBERS ONLY FORUMS, get the most out of the site by learning your way around in the forums where you can safely discuss things you do not want to see copied and pasted on another site.
©Rose Turner
July 2, 2010
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Entries (RSS)
FROM ARTICLE:
“One has to wonder why Harris’ attorneys wanted all of this up for the public once again right before a long holiday weekend.”
> They (AH counsel) MOST LIKELY had this ready and when the OPINION came in from the 1st COA they just FILED the dang thing!!!!!!
Just my OPINION
THEY (AH’s counsel) ARE NOT putting it up for the Public > They IMO are filing this in a Court of LAW to protect their CLIENT FROM this FAKE LAWSUIT,
and I am sure that it is too late to ADD BusyStreet, that is MY HOPE ANYWAY!!!
Beth, part of that filing (redacted by rose due to a protective order issued by the judge) was about rose and her medication, which they (JW) openly filed in complete disregard to the current judges orders.
This whole lawsuit makes me so sick to my stomach and I don’t know if it’s the lawyers or the ones who have ‘picked sides’. The last few days have shown me that some have no scruples. It’s a ‘anything for the cause’ free for all and it is so morally corrupt. So many advanced their own agenda and had no regard for anyone other than the end goal. The same ones that carry the same old worn out line…”poor grieving and well respected”. IF they even had an iota of sense they would see that this lawsuit will only throw back that “poor grieving and well respected” person right back into the limelight. Just as Seidlin has done. Bless his poor little pee pickin’ heart. He doesn’t realize that he’s now a laughing stock. And if any thought he was the ‘means to the end’, they put their documents in the wrong basket. Don’t feel sorry for any of them anymore. Don’t have an ounce of compassion left. Would relish the thought of tabloid mud thrown about after witnessing/reading just how vindictive some are.
Just back on….
I hadn’t read any of the downloads yet, though I downloaded them and then had company over…
I didn’t see the words written after the downloads until now, they must have been added after the downloads were put up.
Sorry to hear that JW disregarded the Judges Orders again, maybe nobody will dare buy them and put them up un-redacted due
to them KNOWING the Judge ordered differently? That is my hope.
I put my ‘lid switch’ in my Kenmore Washing Machine! Saved over 100 bucks doing it myself, it cost under $15.00 including S/H from Amazon.
Happy 4th of JULY weekend everyone!
Beth, not only did they put that in there, but they left the phone #’s and physical address’s of various people in there, including ours, most of the various parties (VA, HKS’s AND his parents, BS’s addy and phone, etc, including third party witness’s).
Forgot to put in there, Good job on replacing that switch. Ours went out and instead of buying a new one, I just rigged it up by passing it. *chuckles*
Ken, [6]
Thanks! That’s right you and I talked about this some months back… I had rigged mine too and it has lasted since the time we posted about it.
But a few days ago my ‘rigging’ broke apart, making it impossible to bypass or rig any further…
You know I had a easy time taking off the frame (w/ help of youtube video) no problem grounding the ground wire, screwing in the switch or pinning the wires up to the other connection. The worst thing was trying to get the dang frame back in the right spot! It must have took twice as long as doing all the prior things!
What happened to the old washing machines that had a magnet in the lid and you could just bypass it w/ another magnet?
I was so surprised it was at Amazon! I already have my account up there for getting books for the kids, so that was nice.
I ordered on 6-27 or maybe the 28th and it was in my PO Box in no time!
Well, sorry to go on about it! Just still amazed on how now it works fine! LOL
Regarding some of the answers in these exhibits >> OMG! LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!!
Pg. 7, Exh B
“…No. 9: All documents evidencing or relating to payments compensation of any kind or remuneration due or made by you or made on YOUR BEHALF in connection with any witnesses in this Lawsuit, including but not limited to Crystal Anne Baker, Yvonne Waddell…”
RESPONSE: None
________________________
BULL! Bold face LIES! imo
That would include the cost of plane fare (round trip) for McC, DC to Canada, the cost of the person who transcribed the answers to the questions that were SELECTED for Baker w/ NO other person from opposing side to ask follow-up questions or their own…
That would include the cost of flying Waddle out to Texas and then flying her home… and whatever else MAY HAVE OCCURRED… Even if you bought her a cup of coffee…. LIST IT DUMMIES!
There was much said about incentives that Waddles got for answering or being ‘helped’ to answer specific leading questions (imo) LIST THOSE! If there is any, OR expect to go to JAIL if you don’t comply!
No wait…. that is only with judge TL isn’t it!
For all of those creepy posters who got off on putting down Lyn and Butterfly for NOT COMPLYING (to UNLAWFUL Orders as it turns out) THEN WHERE IN THE HELL is your OUTRAGE of these bozos doing this?
No. 14: “RESPONSE: Please see the expert report of A. David Ax*****, MD regarding Virgie A….. dated 03/19/10, bates numbers ARTHUR00033-ARTGYR000145 attached hereto as Exhibit B.”
WHAT? You filed the damn lawsuit in 2008, and two years later you get a report done by a doctor?????
>>> FAKE CASE! BOGUS CASE! More lies than Rita’s book and Sedlin’s book COMBINED!!! jmho
*** Man! This is all I can stomach for now………………..
Well, I did skim down to the end…
WHAT AM I MISSING ON THIS ONE?
Q: list marriage and divorce decrees
RESPONSE > M 1965, Judgment 1987, then ANOTHER Decree of Divorce 1983
>>> so does that mean married DLT (65), Divorce DRH (83) THEN got a judgment on the from DLT in 1987? [ 4 years after the marriage in-between ] ??? Good Lord! You’d have to be an accountant to keep up! jmho on this matter.
Beth, I am outaged. That is why I am here.
For some reason the exhibits are all coming up blank for me.
Oh well, the mystery of ex A the “Mother” letter is solved. And that is all that VA has to show for the Mother?Daugher relationship SINCE 2000? Now that gives one time to pause. And take it all in….in context.
Any other tid bits as at to what Ex B – J includes would be appreciated.TIA
I have them mostly figured out except fo EX D? ( using the footnotes). Anyone care to tell me what Ex D is?
HOLD THE F&%$ING PRESSES…… VIRGIE ARTHUR REFUSES TO TURN OVER ANY PHOTOS OF HER AND ANNA NICOLD BECAUSE IT WILL DEVALUE THEM WITH FUTURE MEDIA SALES………. VIRGIE, I THOUGHT IT WASN’T ABOUT THE MONEY?? YOU WON’T TURN PICS OVER ACCORDING TO YOUR ATTORNEY BECAUSE THEY WONT BE WORTH AS MUCH MONEY WHEN YOU TRY TO SELL THEM IN THE FUTURE…….. YOU ARE UNBELIEVABLE. WHY DON’T YOU LEAVE ALL THESE PEOPLE ALONE?? IT WAS YOU, AFTER ALL, THAT WENT OUT TO EVERY TALKING HEAD THAT WOULD HAVE YOU. IT WAS YOU, AFTER ALL THAT DEGRADED YOU OWN DAUGHTER. SHE JUST MERELY RESPONDED TO YOUR OUTRAGEOUS ACCUSATIONS AND THE FACT YOU WENT AND LAYED ON HER SON’S GRAVE WITH A CAMERA CREW CAPTURING YOUR “GRIEF”. LAST TIME I CHECKED, CAMERA CREWS DON’T FOLLOW THE GRIEVING AROUND AND PAY THEM MONEY TO STAGE FOOTAGE. USUALLY, THE GRIEVING WITHDRAW INTO THEMSELVES. THEY FOR SURE DONT GO ON NATIONAL TELEVISION AND SMILE AND LAUGH THEIR WAY THROUGH INTERVIEWS ABOUT THEIR DEAD LOVED ONES…….
Ladies
Check out exhitbit b page 5 number 2…… that says it all doesn’t it??
trina, (you can email rose thru reg email or the forum messages and she can mail them to you if you want)
> I will put them all just incase, I borrowed some of these descriptions…
Exhibit A – Letter from Hamilton to McC and Meyer to confer on VA’s objections
Exhibit B – Arthur’s Objections and Responses to Harris’s second set of requests for production
Exhibit C – Arthur’s Responses to Harris’s First Set of Interrogatories
Exhibit D – Article by AH from his site about ‘Was VA Defamed?’- has his claims about the David L. of Splash e-mails
Exhibit E – Craig Ball’s Invoice (over $70,000) for ONE INVOICE!
Exhibit F – Order from FL granting baby DL the sole right to determine the dispositions of her mothers remains
Exhibit G – VA’s First Request for Production to AH
Exhibit H – Excerpt from ‘RT’s “sworn statement” from February 9, 2009
Exhibit I – Excerpt from ‘RT’s deposition from April 2, 2010
Exhibit J – Plaintiff’s disclosures
Roxanne,
Devalue them? LOL There are enough pics of ANS out in the world, any w/ her mom I cannot think of a soul who would purchase them,
especially knowing how angry Anna was at her for her (VA) actions the last 12 years of Anna and Daniel’s life.
You know now I think about it when Anna’s family sold her out (the outing of the Marshall video) they actually harmed Daniel too in the process.
It’s no wonder Anna was so furious and cut them out of her life so many years ago.
Start the Presses now… (just kidding, I thought that phrase was cute!) ANY future money made from VA should be attached by all the Defendants WRONGED in this FAKE CASE.
DEFENDANTS >> Get a JUDGEMENT against VA when this case is dropped for having NO MERIT for all the pain, suffering, and costs to you.
HELL! The Defendants have suffered MORE PUBLIC HUMILIATION that VA has, and they did not try to sell themselves to the media and get paid!
VA will be found to be a limited public figure on all matters between the time the Court has set its boundaries, NO DEFAMATION, NO CONSPIRACY TO DEFAME, PAY THE DEFENDANTS THEIR RETRIBUTIONS YOU CASED (harmed) THEM! By McC’s BRILLIANT PLAN!
CASED s/b CAUSED (harmed)
Rox…that was a doozey wasn’t it? I wonder why those pictures aren’t tainted?
Whose McCabe trying to fool? There would be no photos of Anna with her mother since 2000, when they hadn’t personally seen each other since November, 1995. Or is McCabe referring to photos pre-1995? It seems he’s already delusionally plotting for Virgie’s big coming out party for her to take center-stage in the Anna Nicole Smith saga once they “vanquish” Howard. Probably already sizing up what media outlet will be the highest bidder for that first photo of Virgie with Dannielynn.
Ruby
I’m thinking, like you that there are NO picutures in existence after 2000. If they are, and they very well could be, they are very limited in number and probably all from once single occasion. That isn’t going to look well in court now is it? The thing about “devaluing” the pictures is pretty damn funny considering it’s always been about “Virgies reputation” and “not about the money.” Well, if it wasn’t about the money then why in the hell are they worried about the value??
Beth [7] can I hire you to fix my dryer? LOL! My dryer needs to have the bearing greased but the problem is I have a stackable [gives more room in laundry area] and in order to get to the bearing the whole front needs to be taken off, the drum needs to be dropped and supposedly that is where the bearing is located. I’m afraid to call the manufacture due to I know it will cost and arm and a leg for them to come out and fix it. Right now I’m dealing with the squealing noise, just don’t know how much longer I can do that though but hey it’s still drying the clothes.
Rox [11] I only skimmed through them yesterday and did not catch the part in exhibit B…thanks for pointing it yep right there in black and white VA intends to profit off her dead daughter.
I agree with you and Ruby, there are no pic’s of Anna with VA after 2000 matter of fact I tend to agree with Ruby, there are most likely none after 1995.
You know it may have helped [not really just want to point out] if VA produced some pic’s of her at Anna and Marshall’s wedding…Oops my bad, VA did not attend the wedding matter of fact VA didn’t even help plan her daughters wedding.
Funny VA tells the media how she supported Anna marrying the old man but was not involved in the planning or in attendance of the nuptials.
Question…
The pic’s of Anna, Daniel and VA [amongst other younger pic's of ANS] that had already been made available for viewing via Internet, are they the ones that VA SOLD after [she claims prior, BS] the death of Daniel?
JMA,
LOL Years ago my dryer made noise as the drum was turning…
Dummy me, pulled it out and squirted WD-40 in hole thru a panel in the back. (a small square metal panel screwed on w/ four bolts)
It sounded better when I tried it, so I thought let me squirt some while it was turning…
IT STARTED ON FIRE!
That was my first experience w/ a fire extinguisher! I should have read the directions before I needed to use it!
I bet if you search GOOGLE and ask it > how do you grease a stackable dryer bearing you might have some detailed answers…
Happy 4th of July week-end to you and your family dear.
Beth [21] “I should have read the directions before I needed to use it! ” and here women are always onto us guys about reading directions before we do anything
Happy 4th July all!
Where is Beverly?
I believe she went away for the holiday weekend….
Actually she went away for 2 weeks…
BEVERLY says:
July 1, 2010 at 4:33 am
Good Morning,Just want to take a minute to wish HAPPY 4th of July everyone,I am having a 2 week vacation off Cape,it is now time for class reunion,and we are doing ELVIS pool party early.LIANN—-My bet you are enjoying every bit of the redecorating,that was always my thing new curtains,drapes,some homes are doing just blinds and always new dishes,Lord so many sets of dishes,I hope you have a fireplace.HAPPY HOLIDAY
It really doesn’t matter when she sold the pictures it shows her for what she is making any money she can off her daughter and grandson by selling those pictures..She has a pension and I would imagine her hubby works so why the incessant need for more and more money?Seems like the wole family was after making money off of Anna just like people did after Elvis died and now MJ.Bunch of bottom feeders!!!!!
Did anyone else notice in Exhibit E that there were THOUSANDS of emails recovered from Lyndal’s yahoo account. Just like she said there would be when she asked repeatedly that the Yahoo Servers be subpeoned. Aug. 1 there were 2500 and Aug. 2 there was an additional 4000. THATS 6500 EMAILS FOR THOSE WHO NEED A LITTLE HELP UNDERSTANDING. Now why would she “stage a robbery” and not delete those emails and then tell the courts and the attorneys that they could get it all from the Yahoo Servers. She even offered to give them the password to make it easy. Isn’t that exactly what ended up happening? Yea, I believe it is. I really hope the truth about a certain testimony that day come out. A certain cop should be ashamed of himself. Dirty laundry comes clean when there are a few drinks involved…….
Yes Roxanne, I caught that and immediately thought of her having to go to jail over all this crazy s***t.
Just reading Exhibit F. This judge is a dumbass. Anyone notice the comment about Valentines Day? He is just tacky. Also, take notice of the footnote on page 7. Now he is saying the exact opposite of VA to sell his book. Pathetic.
pg 18 he refers to proceedings as a boxing ring….. this guy is unbelievable!!!
#28 Rox did you see the cost of his work and with the court mandanus thingy where does it leave the information etc…which was not legally gathered.
Rox #30 I am not going to read the crying Judges book but is he now saying his judgement was wrong?
Heath
I believe that is the jest of what he is saying. He has totally done a 180 on what he said about VA in those papers. Now he says he should have given her ANS body to bring “home to Texas.” I guess the douche bag is forgetting that ANS HATED Texas.
Rose..you said…lawyers can put anything into a filing, even if they know it is false…that works both ways huh?
In one of those exhibits, McC states that HS and Anna conspired against VA. Why is Anna’s name not in the suit? I guess that wouldn’t look to good to file suit against the estate tho would it?
Hope everyone had a nice 4th!
Bewoldered right if they used Annas name it would be against DL and that would really make VA look bad even to her supporters going after DL money fore herself.
sorry Bewildered
hmm… any lawsuit that virgie files against the estate or Birkhead affects Dannielynn. IMO, her supporters don’t give a rats ass about Dannielynn and all that has been done since Anna’s death. They care aqbout virgie.
I think Bhead was just the means to try and ensare TMZ.
DG, I doubt most, or at least a good portion of them, of the VAS’s really care about VA or anything other than seeing someone go to jail and be destroyed. Most seem, to me at least, to be nothing more than bloodthirsty jackals who would rip anyone to pieces just for fun, whether it’s one of us or one of their own.
thank God that he is no longer a judge he was playing to the camera so he can get his own show even GV said that .As for HS he need God in his side.
Ken..I believe you’re right…maybe we should call them justice gladiators…they do seem to enjoy a blood sport.
Well said Mr. KEN!
“..to be nothing more than bloodthirsty jackals who would rip anyone to pieces just for fun..”
May I add… UNDER THE PRETENSE OF JUSTICE FOR THE MISTAKES ANS & DWS DID THEMSELVES.
LOOKING FOR A ‘SCAPEGOAT’ TO BLAME > HKS,and any bloggers that support Justice for anyone in the Court System.
Even the VA supporters HAVE TO KNOW >> that is a bunch of malarky about LB feeding the story to TMZ.
That email of B. Sterns is just conjecture, hearsay, not allowed in a Court of Law and certainly is no real proof by law IMO.
By the way LB and HKS NEVER (in my mind) EVER, EVER found VA to be a threat to them in any Court in any Country or State.
Have a nice evening everyone, hope you all had a great 4th of July this year!
Beth
The funny thing is that story was sent by many people to TMZ. BEFORE everyone knew just how wrong parts of it were, a whole bunch of people from QV’s (including QV herself) sent that story link to TMZ’s “suggestion” link. There is no telling who’s they picked up on but when they did pick it up, they vetted it a little better than QV and Jane and a few others did and they published it correctly. It is NOT a defamatory article. It is the truth. Most of the comments on that article go a little something like…. “well its not blood……”.
Roxanne [28] thanks for pointing that out, yes why someone would stage something in this case a supposed robbery without covering their ass first! Why would they give access to their email account if they were trying to hide something/anything? IMO what Lyndal went through is BS!!!
Ken [40] SPOT ON…I agree with you on this 110% they could give two sh**s about VA!
Hope Everyone had a wonderful 4th of July weekend…I know I did and boy am I paying for it in the long run
little toooooooo much party 
for me 
new article up but rose has not read the papers yet.