Selling pictures of Hollywood Babies

“Baby Pimpin’“… who would have ever thought this would be something that we would be talking about? …to have access to a “celebrity” infant is a real money maker…

Old Hollywood was all about glamour, great estates and wonderful cars. Today, you have these flash-in-the-pan losers grabbing the new born ASAP and getting to the “paps.” The days when moguls and stars would keep their children under wraps to prevent them from being exploited in the media…

…How easy would it be for an unstable person to try and hurt the child as it is being tucked under one’s arm in the search of someone to take a picture. We have all seen it, “Oh I am going shopping on Robertson Blvd,” knowing that there will be photogs waiting, or the little mommy or daddy time at the park, too bad you called and told the photogs you would be there. Phonies all of them! John Lennon’s family understands… …Not in Hollywood, it is still very much, “quick get the kid, I have bills to pay.” We have witnessed this too many times to deny it.

”Hollywood Gossip” reported that Kourtney Kardashian dragged her newborn to Ryan Seacrest’s KIIS-FM radio show, Baby Pimping. “How cute is baby Mason?!” Seacrest asked, happily playing the role of enabler to one of the stars of a series he produces. “Is baby ready to feed? He’s looking for your breast.” …Paris Hilton had a name at least…”The Kardashians”?

“Hollywood Gossip” also took a slap at Birkhead, “Note to Larry Birkhead: the baby pimping bar has been raised to a new level. Will you meet it? To do so, Anna Nicole Smith’s baby daddy will need to bring his young child on to a radio show and then act as if he’s doing it just to see a pal.”

It is my opinion that this “Baby Pimping” is going to continue as these wanna-be-famous types will use whatever they can to promote themselves and to make a buck, after all it is the American way. The problem is that soon there is always someone more interesting and fascinating to the press and to those who read this trash. I am old enough to remember the Kennedys, Sinatra, Onassis and others who made it a point to keep their children out of the limelight…then again, they did not have to stand on their children’s backs to make a buck, those were the days of true Hollywood Glamour and Class.

There is much more real thought provoking in John J. Nazarian’s article at this link below.

http://desperateexes.com/2010/02/03/celebrity-baby-pimping/

While you are there be sure to browse Mr. Nazarian’s many thoughts on Hollywood. Be sure to read the article “The Emotional Cost of Divorce”, on Desperate Exes.com I found tears in my eyes as I read that earlier this week and I think any of you with children who have been through a divorce or know someone who has will agree with me, John J. Nazarian “got it”!

©John J. Nazarian
February 4, 2010
Used with the permission of John Nazarian P. I. – writer
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of our featured author, John Nazarian, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
34 Responses to “Selling Pictures of Hollywood Babies, Thoughts by John J. Nazarian”
  1. BEVERLY says:

    John—-I see a different Larry Birkhead,than you do.After watching mothers putting there child through beauty pagents,my stomach turned over .I have found Larry to be a proud father,and Lord knows there is enough of the other.Most people took to asking why Larry always carried Dannielynn,you explained it correct,to many nuts out there that would take a child.(pimping) is a word that drives me crazy.Most parents are proud of there child,and a lot go way over the edge.I have also found it is the public demands that dictate .I have a question for you,you yourself like to have pictures taken with stars to show all the in people you know,Larry has a child of once famous Anna Nicole Smith.I find nothing wrong,with what he has done or will do.in fact,John,I AM VERY PROUD, that he was man enough to fight and put a discusting grandmother in her place,do you think Vergie at her age and with her medical problems wanted Dannielynn because she was her daughter child,NO WAY.GRANDMA SAW DOLLAR SIGNS :angel-devil:

  2. heath says:

    I agree John. It was only yesterday I saw pics of Ben Afflecks wife and kids at the park and thought you stupid woman..front on pics of their faces and anyone could use the information..kidnapping extortion etc why would they do that?? Not even a security man with them just all alone with the photograper.

    Beverley Larry likes having his photo taken and maybe he needs the dollars to keep fighting grandma, so does Dannielyn, maybe a 2 edged sword that fits with Larry being a photographer.

    I would rather he did lovely classy shots of her than the papparrazzi style crap though as I am always going to be interested in her well being. So I am fickle I know.

    But it is all so wrong using these babies and it will end in tears.

  3. BEVERLY says:

    HEATH—I love the picture john put on his article.I want to kiss the sweethearts face off.I do not understand why people have to take apart everything Larry does with his child,Dannielynn had a special gift given to her,I am facing facts now,not living in a made up fantasy world.Do you think Dannielynn could have lived a happy life,with Anna and Howard? knowing Larry was the real father.I know Dannielynn is in the right hands because the good Lord,chose the time to take Anna,as much as I feel for Howard,I would not have wanted to see the life of fighting back and forth,Larry is the dad of a famous child,I TRULY WISH he was left aloneI think he is doing a wonderful job

  4. John J. Nazarian P.I. says:

    :nopity:

  5. Larry Birkhead says:

    Maybe everyone here needs to understand that there is interest in where we go and what I do with my child. So the big crime is that somebody takes pictures of us?

    Maybe I should start a new category called “Larry Pimping” “Anna Pimping” “Howard Pimping” “Dr. K pimping,” because that in my opinion is basically what some have been guilty of by using all of our names. Some generate money off of it too. Maybe, that makes them a pimp-pimper. Some people criticize, then follow the cameras where ever they go, going as far as making friends with friends of a friend in this saga. Showing up at birthday parties-”say cheese,” :mrgreen: showing up at court hearings-”say cheese.” :mrgreen: Yet, it is o.k. for them to go to an event and be photographed merely being a “private” investigator, :bow: a former hairdresser, :clown: a former stylist, :beer: :lol: etc., but let the daggers throw when it comes to a father taking his child somewhere. Get over it, I say. The media is interested so they take pictures. Just because I walk across the street with my child doesn’t mean I make money. Show me some proof that I or anyone I know calls and tips off photographers, you can’t. It almost sounds a bit jealous for someone so far removed from this situation to keep commenting. Like a bad break up or something. Speaking of break-ups, I wish that some people would just tell the reason for the sudden about face. It wasn’t because they saw the light, :bs: it’s because they thought they weren’t going to see enough of them, say cheese.

    My child is photographed rarely in comparison to other celebrity kids, that is because I make sure of it. But on that rare occasion, that I want to take my daughter to a park (1mi from our home), to a store, or shopping mall doesn’t mean the cash register is churning. We have to live in a bubble because some idiot wants to analyze our GPS coordinates? Don’t think so!

    If I am a baby pimper then baby pimping seems to be very popular with a great deal of people. I saw Brad and Angelina’s babies, I saw Tom and Katie’s baby, I saw Tori Spelling’s baby, I opened up the magazine and saw all kinds of babies…oh my god they have all been pimped because someone takes their picture. Kevin Federline was at the park with his kids, they took his picture because they are the kids of a celebrity, should we call the cops? They all made money off that because they walked across the street? Oh my lord call CPS, wait that has already been done. No luck there either. “Great environment,” I believe was the quote… So take those “talking points” back to your leader…….

    Heath, contrary to stupid articles that only this site would republish, I don’t arrange paparazzi attacks on myself and my daughter.

    I do the best I can and it shows in my daughter’s face and her smile. You would think that the same person would see that happiness as they frantically on a daily basis open their google alerts :eek: with our names flashing, so they can run and cut and paste nasty comments on all the message boards thinking that their schizo attempts would somehow sway public opinion. Or if they write an article and tag our name if web traffic is low visitors will come and see what the site is all about. Because it appears articles about the best pizza or best attorney garner zero comments.

    To those that are supporters thank you and good night. Did I mention my daughter’s happy face and smile? :lol:

    :hug08: :dance:

  6. BEVERLY says:

    Dear Larry,with every comment you make,I feel the pride you have in your little sweetheart.YOU DO NOT have to defend yourself for any of your actions.Dannielynn is your child,not anyone elses

  7. JMA says:

    Larry [6] I must say I agree with you many Celebrities children are being photographed not just DL. Furthermore, I will say you are doing a good job raising your child and yes, every pic I’ve seen published she looks very happy.

    With that said…

    As for the comment concerning CPS being called, that from what I understand was done by a Blogger/Bloggers who supports VA.

    As for the Google Alerts, again take it up with VA’s supporters cause we all get them too and we’re not Celebrities or have a child/children by/with a Celebrity.

    Apparently you only monitor this site maybe you should surf on over to the others that show no love for you what so ever, the real monster of hate are over at Topix and a few other places which I will not name here but you must know if your surfing the Net for comments regarding/in reference to you!!

  8. JMA says:

    Hey John, looks like you went and pissed in someone’s cornflakes when you decided to write this article so they decided to come here and bash this site, apparently they don’t have the balls to confront their true haters.

    PS,

    If this comment is to blunt then feel free to remove it but it is JMO in reference to post #6

  9. JMA says:

    Oops where are my manners, Bev it’s great to have you back you were missed.

  10. Rose says:

    OK folks I have a very serious question and statement here right now.. :)

    Who sent the tree on Face Book? :what: I got an email for a gift of a tree the other day and had NO idea what it meant… :oops: :?: Rox told me last night that it meant I had been invited to do something and start playing a game there…. :dance: SO PLEASE, who ever sent it to me resend it, I promise I will send one back… :hurray:

  11. Lucky says:

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA………..WOW

    Larry, Larry, Larry……………….that was an EXCELLENT smackdown guy! What they write about you and your daughter is the most sickening of all trash. The CPS crud from Alamo, and I think Faye at the dungeon site was the utmost of sick. They tear you and her apart with any crumb they can get. So many of those sick bored nasty biddies have not one thing in life better to do than to trash you and your gorgeous daughter nonstop on a daily basis. They are only jealous of you and your life, and sadly their lives are so negative its all they have. They too trash every blogger who supports you all. Trust me I know all too well. The stalk the bloggers too. How stupid is that? They should not be allowed by law to trash her so much. A child is precious and should be protected from evil as that is and off limits to all. I applaud you for all you do. I find by what I see, that Dannielynn is a gorgeous and healthy child, who loves her daddy very much. The bond is clear and I think Anna would be proud after all that has been done. That alone, drives the needy insane.

    You are right about the photos. Who cares. I for one enjoy seeing her from time to time and to know how great she is doing. Better than seeing the nuts photos who stalk your every move. Keep up the great work. I pity you for having to go thru all you do. I hope you make MILLIONS and I hope Howard makes MILLIONS. I wish only the best for you two and your entire families, after all you are being put thru. May one day, you find peace from all the evil that stalks you and hounds you.

    Not sure if its really you and dont care. I feel better just thinking its you and knowing what you said was so true and LONG over due to those nuts. Put them back in the dark dungeon where they belong with the truth.

    Peace be with you, your daughter, Howard, and all your families. Have a great life full of only positive energy and keep rockin on. :applaud:

  12. Lucky says:

    JMA………..I didn’t take it as him trashing this site, but more towards all who trash him and his daughter on any site. Maybe he felt better or safer posting it here instead of the dark sick dungeon. Posting his message here instead on the two or three other sites! Just a guess. I did enjoy the smackdown for sure to any and all who trash him and his daughter. Why lower himself to the other sites, when here was just fine considering the article was written for here.

  13. Lucky says:

    JMA…………maybe he did and maybe that’s why another whole thread was SHUT DOWN. When will they learn? They breed for hatred over there and elsewhere. Its their life sadly.

  14. Ray says:

    Larry, great post….I just hate people that pick the bones of this sweet baby. You have a the rights to take DL out to the park and shopping without some nut saying you are pimping her out. You will always have some nuts out there trying to bash you and DL. Being a single parents it the hardest job on this earth, and I feel you are doing a great job and working hard to make her life happy and health. Keep up the good work.

  15. Rose says:

    Lucky you are so right, I understand that LB, HKS and in life ANS feel so like they live in a bubble… :nonosign: I guess they all are somewhat prepared for the “stalking and looking over their shoulders” , but none of the bloggers should have been. :wtf: Just like the crazy hate blogger that crossed two state lines to take pictures of our home, they have called ppl’s employers trying to get them fired or the social security fraud trying to send me to jail. Because of the comment in reassurance that Social Security made to me, I understand what LB meant with his response of CPS, there is no person on the internet that has any idea what goes on behind close doors at DL’s home, it is sick really sick. :puke: However, and on and on and on it goes, hunting anything they could about the bloggers… I still wonder why I am in a lawsuit with LB, HKS and others, never met them and never want to. This site and the bloggers here came together for one simple truth, NONE of us thought or could ever think that HKS murdered anyone :dunno: and if the facts had led there I would have followed the court papers down that road. As I have said many times I did not even know the name of HKS, and all I knew about ANS when she died, was that she was from Texas, was a playmate, married a much older man and went to the Supreme court. So I don’t think I came into following the burial proceedings with any preconceived thoughts on anyone, I was just shocked that the “infotainment passes as news” could do that to ANYONE.

    BTW that really is LB, I am glad like you Lucky that he felt safe saying what he wanted to say here, perhaps he will post again some time when something feels like it hits home… I was shocked to find that the Hollywood madam felt safe posting here as well.

    It was bad that Hollywood Gossip took such a swipe at LB wasn’t it? :badmood: You always see DL in a controlled setting for pictures and with her head covered in the airports. :nonosign:

    I don’t think there is a woman in the world that did not “get it”, the amount of guilt and grief that ANS went through, she had nothing to do with her beloved son’s death and the interview she gave about trading one child for the other and not understanding why, I think pulled at the heart of all mothers :cry: … DL will always be known as the beautiful child of Anna Nicole Smith, and she is that as beautiful as her mother…

    It is nice to see any new posters enjoy the smilies to put on the posts… so LB any time you want to sound off, do it here in a safe place where the beautiful DL is appreciated and where the regular posters have to have not only grey matter between their ears, but they also have to know how to use it. :rantswitch:

    One corrections though “page reads” are not the same as “posts” and all of our guest authors, whether JN, DC, Sprocket, some that are following the Casey Anthony story in Florida, I laugh with all of them and I openly tell them at the end of the day, it is all about page reads not number of posts… BTW this article has pulled in over 3,000 to just read.. and we don’t do ads or sell anything so yea I am proud of the bloggers here, the guest authors, and those who just read, perhaps they leave thinking and googling and not buying the crap at those hate filled sites. :dblfu2:

  16. JMA says:

    Lucky [13] I got the impression that he was trashing/bashing this site due to this “Heath, contrary to stupid articles that only this site would republish, I don’t arrange paparazzi attacks on myself and my daughter.”

    And this, “Because it appears articles about the best pizza or best attorney garner zero comments.”, so IMO it looks as though he was.

  17. JMA says:

    As for the rest of his post concerning pictures being taken every day of Celebrities children not just his child and how happy DL is, I agree with him 100% and feel he is doing a great job raising her regardless of what the haters think.

  18. Roxanne says:

    Larry

    You began as NOTHING and you remain NOTHING!!! The interest isn’t for you. It is that beautiful daughter you lucked up with. Your claim to fame is that your daughter belonged to the tragic ANNA NICOLE SMITH. Nothing more. Do you honestly think we sit around and think about you. Yes, I love see how happy Dannielynn is and how much she looks like her beautiful MOTHER. I have no problem with baby pictures being taken in a controlled situation. It is when someone calls and says “hey we are going to be here so come take our pictures.” that is really ridiculous. You know kind of like the pics of Dannielynn at her mother and brothers grave. Talk about tacky. You can’t take her to visit the graves of her family without a camera in her face and it was so obvious in the videp when that innocent baby pointed and said “momma” that it was you who prompted her to do so. Get a grip man. NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOU.

  19. Lucky says:

    Rose…………we all know how true your words are about them and the bloggers. That’s one reason Anna moved to the Bahamas in the first place. They dont go crazy over celebrities there. They are just everyday folks there. The celebrities have made themselves public. We the bloggers have not. And its insane how the VAS stalked the bloggers who were in support of Anna, Larry and Howard. Are/were they perfect? Heck no, no one is. The only perfect I know of, is in the heavens.

    JN had one thing right. Dannielynn should have full protection and I hope Larry has done so. I would not put anything past the nuts and stalkers who clock his every move.

    Jealously and or envy is the only reason anyone takes a swipe at him. I do think he felt safer posting his thoughts here. Just a guess and opinion. He, nor anyone deserve what they do to him or write about him. Nor do you or I, or any blogger of support. No one deserves that trash and hate.

    I am patiently awaiting your “third parties” article. LOL

  20. Ken says:

    Lucky,
    about the 3rd parties article, she’s not only working on that but also working on one about JO’Q's estate being liquidated. She promises to have one up today and one over the weekend.

  21. Rose says:

    #17 JMA, yea he made a few negative comments and I hope in the future he neither singles out a guest author, one of our admins/mods, posters etc. :whatever: Perhaps thinking about how he felt will one day spill over to thinking what the owners, authors and regular posters might go through and will just vent and not make it personal at all… :rantswitch:

    This article was after all about the old Hollywood and comparing the new Hollyweird, it isn’t safe for children anywhere (I. E. Caylee Anthony or HaLeigh Cummings as examples) so I think the danger for a child of someone as famous as Anna Nicole Smith would make those who watch over her doubly worried, I too hope that LB has ppl who protect DL when he is in public with her… :eek:

    I did not get that the Hollywood gossip was really about LB, other than the reference in the article that they took a “swipe” at him and that was way near the bottom of the article, it was mostly about Kourtney Kardashian with his name thrown in there. :dunno: I think LB is beginning to fade from the public curiosity which is good, I get very few google alerts about him anymore, I get far more on other stories we cover so perhaps LB will have the blessing of fading into the shadows one day. :dunno:

    And he knows we do not censor ppl here, remember when he blasted me and said I should put up a clock on the blog so my readers would know how much longer I have to live… now that one was a cheap shot but we left it up. Cause we do not censor here

    Also I am beginning to play with the smileys too… however I am far from learning what each one means … :)

  22. Rose says:

    New article up, August 4 is the beginning date for Howard K. Stern, Dr. Kapoor and Dr. Eroshevich :what:

  23. JMA says:

    Rose [22] exactly and yes part of the/this article was taken from something that was published elsewhere it was not something written personally by the Author of this article.

    I agree as well hopefully he does hire someone to protect his child from the people/Bloggers who think they have a right to stalk and/pry into the personal affairs of not only other Bloggers but also those in the media.

    Example:

    It is none of their business where any monies are going or what it’s being spent on, etc, etc. To claim a child’s [meaning DL’s] money is being spent for/on such and such is just BS it’s none of their business and they have no right to know or demand to know anything concerning this child’s money.

    Yes, I remember his very insensitive comment concerning you and IMO it was downright rude! As you said, there is no censorship here so by leaving that comment up showed exactly what kind of person he is to others outside of his personal life.

  24. JMA says:

    For the poster Waldo/Baloney/Whatever moniker it is this week, why the hell would I Google myself [moniker] using JMA+Rose Speaks? Furthermore, how is it I’m getting alerts [yes I did set up the alerts but besides the point] for certain names given/obtained by certain person/persons being searched via MySpace, Facebook & Twitter? Yeah, yeah it’s been explained the Cesspool Troll’s way but of course we all have seen how they/you get their facts straight…ha-ha they/you don’t!

    PS,

    Yea you know how to copy & paste now this is what I think of your ability to do so :dblfu2:

  25. raven says:

    To Larry: Look at it this way……people are interested in you, as well as beautiful, sweet Dannielynn, and they use you to get attention to their articles. Learn to ignore the negative remarks such as “Baby Pimping”. To add a little humor to the situation…some who don’t have babies, pimp their pets. lol

    You have the look of a devoted father in your eyes, so just overlook all the negatives. Good Luck :bow:

  26. raven says:

    #21 I am really, really interested in reading the liquidation of the estate. Thanks

  27. heath says:

    #6 Larry as I read the article it was pretty general about the pics being taken of the babies and children in the park etc…that is what I really was thinking
    about and am worried that it is getting out of hand..safety first and there are so many nuts out there..

    I am an Aussie and we have a heap more protection because of problems in that area. Photo’s of minors are blurred in the media without a release signed etc…so I am for the protection of minors.

    in answer to this

    Heath, contrary to stupid articles that only this site would republish, I don’t arrange paparazzi attacks on myself and my daughter.

    Stupid articles??? read worse, read better! it was addressing an issue of child safety wasn’t it? That has to be good..

    Don’t arrange paparazzi attacks………I think the paparazzi has a responsibility not to photograph the children. :nonosign: They have to be more responsible don’t you think?

    BUT SOMEONE GETS THE DOLLARS FOR THOSE PHOTOS??????Are you missing out???????

  28. JMA says:

    heath [28] :thumbsup: :applaud:

  29. heath says:

    :soapbox: #6 Larry why didn’t you comment here http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2010/02/kourtney-kardashian-takes-baby-pimping-to-new-level/ when they mentioned your name??? Why here???????

    Did you do anything about the site that had advertisements for anal sex aids on the same page as the pics of your daughter??? Others here know her details and could help you with that..if you need to catch up.

    Last time you posted here it was about a handbag, pity you didn’t defend Anna with as much vigour.

    Why give a toss about our site when we aren’t the problem…

    :rantswitch:

  30. Liann says:

    I am trying to catch up, I have been on the site today but I did not go to this article. I always seem to miss everything.

    I agree with you Rox 100%, Also anyone that exploits a child for personal gain is trash but I do think that any person that has a child of a celebrity should not have to live in a cave. I remember hearing the new laws in California for 2010 and I need to research this more but my understanding is that concerning children of celebs and adult celebs in public places have a certain right to privacy and of paparazzi peaking in home windows but out in public too that if those pictures are sold and published the pap would and the publisher would be fined.

    http://entertainment.ca.msn.com/celebs/news/article.aspx?cp-documentid=23171622

    It is called assembly bill 524, I have not read it.

    here is the thing.. imo Most celebs go to public places and take their kids were they know they will be photographed and hey what good p.r. can one get while playing with their kids?

  31. JMA says:

    Liann [31] I agree with you no they should not have to live in a cave and yes most do go to the places where they know the camera’s will be flashing.

  32. Roxanne says:

    You can’t help going places that people will take your picture. For the most part, Larry does seem to protect Dannielynn from that and most of the pics I have seen of her are done in a controlled enviornment. It’s pics that are taken when they have been given a “tip” that a certain person will be in a certain place at a certain time so make sure the cameras are ready. I’m not saying Larry does that but, I do believe that he wants to be a real celebrity and not the pseudo-celebrity that he is.

  33.  

Our weather forecast is from WP Wunderground

%d bloggers like this:
Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith