Comments on: All Things Anna Nicole Smith Newest Filings in South Carolina and Harris County Texas http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/ Celebrity and High Profile Lawsuits Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:36:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Ken http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61038 Ken Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:48:04 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61038 new article with big announcement on front page new article with big announcement on front page

]]> By: heath http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61034 heath Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:31:19 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61034 All good but an exiting day...we had a huge fire start in an Industrial area and the smoke was able to be seen for miles....really put the blood pressure up. Then we had a thunder storm and rain pelted down and the temp dropped . Didn't last long but it took the edge off. I know other areas got it bad so I feel lucky. Thanks so much for your thoughts. :) I know our weather patterns have changed so much, it is so much hotter here and mild winters etc. I don't know where it will end up. But it hasn't been so hot here that I know of since we moved to this city when I was 10 years old. It was always cooler in the mountains. Ok need to catch up LOL All good but an exiting day…we had a huge fire start in an Industrial area and the smoke was able to be seen for miles….really put the blood pressure up.

Then we had a thunder storm and rain pelted down and the temp dropped . Didn’t last long but it took the edge off.

I know other areas got it bad so I feel lucky.

Thanks so much for your thoughts. :)

I know our weather patterns have changed so much, it is so much hotter here and mild winters etc. I don’t know where it will end up. But it hasn’t been so hot here that I know of since we moved to this city when I was 10 years old. It was always cooler in the mountains.

Ok need to catch up LOL

]]> By: Ken http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61027 Ken Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:01:20 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61027 New article about Casey Anthony up New article about Casey Anthony up

]]> By: DesertWalker http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61026 DesertWalker Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:38:47 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61026 Mighty kind of VA /McCabe to introduce the federal suit in 2008 into the case. Good times in Court are on the way. Many thanks for the docs, Rose. :wink: Heath ... check in as often as you can. We're a bit nervous for you here, especially now that we know you're there alone. Mighty kind of VA /McCabe to introduce the federal suit in 2008 into the case. Good times in Court are on the way. Many thanks for the docs, Rose. :wink:

Heath … check in as often as you can. We’re a bit nervous for you here, especially now that we know you’re there alone.

]]> By: Beth http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61025 Beth Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:59:40 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61025 OMG! How funny! (the whole 'one' page - link below) :lol: http://www.topix.com/forum/who/anna-nicole-smith/T7VRMG6ONOEBGR6SO Have a nice evening all! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Heath, please be safe! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thanks Rose as always for the docs! Very interesting! LOL Not too much praise from the other side's legal eagle on McC's latest motions... ;) I guess they cannot even attempt to spin what is becoming VERY CLEAR to all now! TX are the ones WHO HAVE ALWAYS WANTED THIS FAKE CASE DELAYED! Because they have NO CASE, NO ACTUAL CONSPIRED DEFAMATION! The case was to make HKS (all other defendants are just collateral damage) pay for daring to SUE O'Q! LOL If HKS hadn't won... do you think TX firm would want this much revenge? (that is Bull Sh*t on: 'just his legal fees got paid in FL' I bet!) * MAD about the FL burial hearing, MAD about the loss in the Bahamas, MAD about the loss in FL defamation case against O'Q, MAD about the loss in TX FEDERAL COURT w/ VA.... There is NOTHING left for them to make up and SUE for! SOON > this will be over for all the Defendants! ** Then there should be a class action suit against the plaintiff and her counsel and their 'untrained helpers' for these FALSE CHARGES! JMHO on that! ;) Goodnight everyone. OMG! How funny! (the whole ‘one’ page – link below) :lol:

http://www.topix.com/forum/who/anna-nicole-smith/T7VRMG6ONOEBGR6SO

Have a nice evening all!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Heath, please be safe!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks Rose as always for the docs!
Very interesting!
LOL Not too much praise from the other side’s legal eagle on McC’s latest motions… ;)
I guess they cannot even attempt to spin what is becoming VERY CLEAR to all now!

TX are the ones WHO HAVE ALWAYS WANTED THIS FAKE CASE DELAYED! Because they have NO CASE, NO ACTUAL CONSPIRED DEFAMATION!
The case was to make HKS (all other defendants are just collateral damage) pay for daring to SUE O’Q!
LOL If HKS hadn’t won… do you think TX firm would want this much revenge? (that is Bull Sh*t on: ‘just his legal fees got paid in FL’ I bet!)

* MAD about the FL burial hearing, MAD about the loss in the Bahamas, MAD about the loss in FL defamation case against O’Q, MAD about the loss in TX FEDERAL COURT w/ VA…. There is NOTHING left for them to make up and SUE for! SOON > this will be over for all the Defendants!

** Then there should be a class action suit against the plaintiff and her counsel and their ‘untrained helpers’ for these FALSE CHARGES! JMHO on that!

;) Goodnight everyone.

]]> By: Beth http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61024 Beth Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:07:30 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61024 Sound familiar? ;) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "In Simpson, the trial court appointed a master based on the complexity of the toxic-tort case before it, which involved one plaintiff and 18 defendants. Id. Over the course of 10 months, 8 discovery motions were filed, but the trial court did not hear any of the pending discovery disputes before appointing the master. Id. The supreme court concluded that the appointment of the master constituted a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court because, although the case may have been more complicated than others on the trial court’s docket, “it can hardly be said to be exceptional, at least at this point in its development.” Id. The supreme court explained that “[e]ven if this were an exceptional case, based upon the allegations in the pleadings, the number of parties, or the amount of activity it generated, we would be reluctant to approve the trial court’s delegation of the supervision of all discovery to be conducted in the case to the master.” Id. at 811–12." Sound familiar? ;)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“In Simpson, the trial court appointed a master based on the complexity of the toxic-tort case before it, which involved one plaintiff and 18 defendants.
Id. Over the course of 10 months, 8 discovery motions were filed, but the trial court did not hear any of the pending discovery disputes before appointing the master. Id. The supreme court concluded that the appointment of the master constituted a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court because, although the case may have been more complicated than others on the trial court’s docket, “it can hardly be said to be exceptional, at least at this point in its development.” Id. The supreme court explained that “[e]ven if this were an exceptional case, based upon the allegations in the pleadings, the number of parties, or the amount of activity it generated, we would be reluctant to approve the trial court’s delegation of the supervision of all discovery to be conducted in the case to the master.” Id. at 811–12.”

]]> By: Beth http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61023 Beth Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:01:17 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61023 Yes Liann! It is a great post!!! :) On pg. 4 direct contravention (violation) of Simpson vs. Canales.... http://www.1stcoa.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/htmlopinion.asp?OpinionId=83152 "The appointment of a master lies within the sound discretion of the trial court and should not be disturbed unless a clear abuse of that discretion is found. Simpson v. Canales, 806 S.W.2d 802, 811 (Tex. 1991). The Texas Supreme Court has held that “Rule 171 is the exclusive authority for appointment of masters in our state courts” and “every referral to a master, unless authorized by statute or consented to by the parties, must comply with Rule 171.” Id. at 810 & n.12 (giving non-exhaustive listing of matters authorized by statute). Here, because there does not appear to be an applicable statute and because Holt did not consent to the appointment, the issue is whether the trial court had the authority to compel Holt to submit matters to the master under Rule 171. See id. at 810–11 & n.12. Rule 171 provides as follows, in pertinent part: The court may, in exceptional cases, for good cause appoint a master in chancery, who shall be a citizen of this State, and not an attorney for either party to the action, nor related to either party, who shall perform all of the duties required of him by the court, and shall be under orders of the court, and have such power as the master in chancery has in a court of equity. Tex. R. Civ. P. 171. Hence, Rule 171 permits a trial court to appoint a master “in exceptional cases, for good cause.” Id. The “exceptional case” and “good cause” standards are “not susceptible [to] precise definition.” Simpson, 806 S.W.2d at 811. Although the trial court may consider the complexity of the case, the rule’s standards may not be satisfied merely by showing that a case is time-consuming or complicated. Id. In Simpson, the trial court appointed a master based on the complexity of the toxic-tort case before it, which involved one plaintiff and 18 defendants. Id. Over the course of 10 months, 8 discovery motions were filed, but the trial court did not hear any of the pending discovery disputes before appointing the master. Id. The supreme court concluded that the appointment of the master constituted a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court because, although the case may have been more complicated than others on the trial court’s docket, “it can hardly be said to be exceptional, at least at this point in its development.” Id. The supreme court explained that “[e]ven if this were an exceptional case, based upon the allegations in the pleadings, the number of parties, or the amount of activity it generated, we would be reluctant to approve the trial court’s delegation of the supervision of all discovery to be conducted in the case to the master.” Id. at 811–12. As in Simpson, there is nothing in the record before us that suggests that this is an “exceptional case” that cannot be handled in the trial court or that “good cause” exists for supervision by a master. There are two parties involved, and the only issue before the trial court at this time is the discovery of non-exempt assets. There was no evidence taken at the December 14 hearing before the trial court appointed Baumann, and, although Holt objected to the appointment, Cedyco offered no explanation. Conclusion We hold that the trial court abused its discretion in appointing a master, conditionally grant Holt’s petition for writ of mandamus, and direct the trial court to vacate its January 19, 2006 order appointing a master and any other orders ancillary thereto. Baumann was appointed solely as master; Ray Crain was appointed the receiver. The record reflects that Baumann has represented himself as the receiver in this case, notonly in his letters to Holt, but also to the United States Post Office in filling out a request re-directing Holt’s mail to Baumann. On February 24, 2006, the trial court ordered thatBaumann could re-direct Holt’s mail, open it, and hold it. The order expressly relievedBaumann from any duty to return any mail to Holt and allowed Holt to retrieve his mail onlyif and in the manner that Baumann chose. Further, the trial court’s order provided that there-direction was to begin immediately and that “[n]o notice is to be given” to Holt. Because this order was ancillary to the trial court’s appointment of a master, for which we grantmandamus relief, we direct the trial court to vacate the February 24 order and further directthe trial court to order Baumann to rescind any measures taken at the United States PostOffice with regard to re-directing Holt’s mail. Close We lift our order of March 28, 2006 staying the proceedings below. We are confident that the trial court will promptly comply, and our writ will issue only if it does not." "Tim Taft Justice" Yes Liann!
It is a great post!!! :)

On pg. 4 direct contravention (violation) of Simpson vs. Canales….

http://www.1stcoa.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/htmlopinion.asp?OpinionId=83152

“The appointment of a master lies within the sound discretion of the trial court and should not be disturbed unless a clear abuse of that discretion is found. Simpson v. Canales, 806 S.W.2d 802, 811 (Tex. 1991). The Texas Supreme Court has held that “Rule 171 is the exclusive authority for appointment of masters in our state courts” and “every referral to a master, unless authorized by statute or consented to by the parties, must comply with Rule 171.” Id. at 810 & n.12 (giving non-exhaustive listing of matters authorized by statute). Here, because there does not appear to be an applicable statute and because Holt did not consent to the appointment, the issue is whether the trial court had the authority to compel Holt to submit matters to the master under Rule 171. See id. at 810–11 & n.12.

Rule 171 provides as follows, in pertinent part:

The court may, in exceptional cases, for good cause appoint a master in chancery, who shall be a citizen of this State, and not an attorney for either party to the action, nor related to either party, who shall perform all of the duties required of him by the court, and shall be under orders of the court, and have such power as the master in chancery has in a court of equity.

Tex. R. Civ. P. 171. Hence, Rule 171 permits a trial court to appoint a master “in exceptional cases, for good cause.” Id. The “exceptional case” and “good cause” standards are “not susceptible [to] precise definition.” Simpson, 806 S.W.2d at 811. Although the trial court may consider the complexity of the case, the rule’s standards may not be satisfied merely by showing that a case is time-consuming or complicated. Id.

In Simpson, the trial court appointed a master based on the complexity of the toxic-tort case before it, which involved one plaintiff and 18 defendants. Id. Over the course of 10 months, 8 discovery motions were filed, but the trial court did not hear any of the pending discovery disputes before appointing the master. Id. The supreme court concluded that the appointment of the master constituted a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court because, although the case may have been more complicated than others on the trial court’s docket, “it can hardly be said to be exceptional, at least at this point in its development.” Id. The supreme court explained that “[e]ven if this were an exceptional case, based upon the allegations in the pleadings, the number of parties, or the amount of activity it generated, we would be reluctant to approve the trial court’s delegation of the supervision of all discovery to be conducted in the case to the master.” Id. at 811–12.

As in Simpson, there is nothing in the record before us that suggests that this is an “exceptional case” that cannot be handled in the trial court or that “good cause” exists for supervision by a master. There are two parties involved, and the only issue before the trial court at this time is the discovery of non-exempt assets. There was no evidence taken at the December 14 hearing before the trial court appointed Baumann, and, although Holt objected to the appointment, Cedyco offered no explanation.

Conclusion

We hold that the trial court abused its discretion in appointing a master, conditionally grant Holt’s petition for writ of mandamus, and direct the trial court to vacate its January 19, 2006 order appointing a master and any other orders ancillary thereto.
Baumann was appointed solely as master; Ray Crain was appointed the receiver. The record reflects that Baumann has represented himself as the receiver in this case, notonly in his letters to Holt, but also to the United States Post Office in filling out a request re-directing Holt’s mail to Baumann. On February 24, 2006, the trial court ordered thatBaumann could re-direct Holt’s mail, open it, and hold it. The order expressly relievedBaumann from any duty to return any mail to Holt and allowed Holt to retrieve his mail onlyif and in the manner that Baumann chose. Further, the trial court’s order provided that there-direction was to begin immediately and that “[n]o notice is to be given” to Holt. Because this order was ancillary to the trial court’s appointment of a master, for which we grantmandamus relief, we direct the trial court to vacate the February 24 order and further directthe trial court to order Baumann to rescind any measures taken at the United States PostOffice with regard to re-directing Holt’s mail.

Close We lift our order of March 28, 2006 staying the proceedings below. We are confident that the trial court will promptly comply, and our writ will issue only if it does not.”

“Tim Taft
Justice”

]]> By: Liann http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61022 Liann Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:50:11 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61022 Beth it is a damn great post!, :) Thanks Swims. Beth it is a damn great post!, :) Thanks Swims.

]]> By: Liann http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61021 Liann Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:46:13 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61021 LOL, I just saw that. lol Hi Beth!, I hope you and yours are good! LOL, I just saw that. lol

Hi Beth!, I hope you and yours are good!

]]> By: Liann http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61020 Liann Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:45:04 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61020 Heath, Just try to stay cool and be safe, I am thinking of you all were your at, ditto JMA #68. Heath, Just try to stay cool and be safe, I am thinking of you all were your at, ditto JMA #68.

]]> By: Beth http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61019 Beth Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:27:29 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61019 LOL Liann! Great minds think alike!!! ;) Sorry about reposting it again... LOL Liann!
Great minds think alike!!! ;)

Sorry about reposting it again…

]]> By: Beth http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61018 Beth Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:22:59 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61018 (Ref: New Blogger Case Documents filed) >> "• Time for VA to show up in Court and explain herself." >>> EXACTLY RIGHT!!! [about time too!] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPOST ~~~~~~ http://www.hcdistrictclerk.com/Edocs/Public/ViewFilePage.aspx?ViewAsType=PDF&TodaysDate=11/19/2009&PublicImageNbr=43910281&CourtID=080 "CBS and AH call b.s. on VA’s Motion to change the pre-trial and trial dates for the ‘bloggers’ case; it’s a page-turner as legal docs go. The bottom line is that such a Motion cannot be set for submission (as it was), rather it must be set for an oral hearing as per Judge Weiman’s own procedural rules of which all parties are aware. • ALL parties must be able to show up at a HEARING and go through this slug of a case in the open, fresh air of a new Court. - CBS and AH point out the multiple mandamus proceedings and chastise VA for calling such writs a delay tactic of the defendants involved. Clearly the 1st COA and the TSC don’t indulge ‘delay’ tactics; they deal with important legal questions. VA is also chastised for saying AH has engaged in ‘massive spoliation’ when in fact that false conclusion comes from the ‘work’ of a Special Master that was unlawfully appointed by Lindsay and who is the very subject of the pending writs of mandamus. Bad, bad VA trying to taint the new Judge’s view of CBS and AH by slipping false and inflammatory and irrelevant one-liners into a Court doc. - CBS and AH also point out that VA has sued many of the same defendants before in the ‘Mommie Dearest’ case which was dismissed with prejudice. The time has come to discuss ‘the truth’ that was dragged out of VA, McCabe and others in the big court. - Just as VA wanted a continuance claiming to need 30 days to write a surreply; a surreply she filed the same day as the Motion asking for 30 days to write it; we see VA saying deadlines need to be extended for such things as naming an expert witness when she already has named an expert witness. Does VA assume the new Judge is no different than the old Judge? • Time for VA to show up in Court and explain herself. Posted on Nov 19th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean" (Ref: New Blogger Case Documents filed) >> “• Time for VA to show up in Court and explain herself.” >>> EXACTLY RIGHT!!! [about time too!]
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

REPOST
~~~~~~

http://www.hcdistrictclerk.com/Edocs/Public/ViewFilePage.aspx?ViewAsType=PDF&TodaysDate=11/19/2009&PublicImageNbr=43910281&CourtID=080

“CBS and AH call b.s. on VA’s Motion to change the pre-trial and trial dates for the ‘bloggers’ case; it’s a page-turner as legal docs go. The bottom line is that such a Motion cannot be set for submission (as it was), rather it must be set for an oral hearing as per Judge Weiman’s own procedural rules of which all parties are aware.

• ALL parties must be able to show up at a HEARING and go through this slug of a case in the open, fresh air of a new Court.

- CBS and AH point out the multiple mandamus proceedings and chastise VA for calling such writs a delay tactic of the defendants involved. Clearly the 1st COA and the TSC don’t indulge ‘delay’ tactics; they deal with important legal questions. VA is also chastised for saying AH has engaged in ‘massive spoliation’ when in fact that false conclusion comes from the ‘work’ of a Special Master that was unlawfully appointed by Lindsay and who is the very subject of the pending writs of mandamus. Bad, bad VA trying to taint the new Judge’s view of CBS and AH by slipping false and inflammatory and irrelevant one-liners into a Court doc.

- CBS and AH also point out that VA has sued many of the same defendants before in the ‘Mommie Dearest’ case which was dismissed with prejudice.
The time has come to discuss ‘the truth’ that was dragged out of VA, McCabe and others in the big court.

- Just as VA wanted a continuance claiming to need 30 days to write a surreply; a surreply she filed the same day as the Motion asking for 30 days to write it; we see VA saying deadlines need to be extended for such things as naming an expert witness when she already has named an expert witness.
Does VA assume the new Judge is no different than the old Judge?

• Time for VA to show up in Court and explain herself.

Posted on Nov 19th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean”

]]> By: Liann http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61017 Liann Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:21:11 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61017 CBS and AH call b.s. on VA’s Motion to change the pre-trial and trial dates for the ‘bloggers’ case; it’s a page-turner as legal docs go. The bottom line is that such a Motion cannot be set for submission (as it was), rather it must be set for an oral hearing as per Judge Weiman’s own procedural rules of which all parties are aware. • ALL parties must be able to show up at a HEARING and go through this slug of a case in the open, fresh air of a new Court. - CBS and AH point out the multiple mandamus proceedings and chastise VA for calling such writs a delay tactic of the defendants involved. Clearly the 1st COA and the TSC don’t indulge ‘delay’ tactics; they deal with important legal questions. VA is also chastised for saying AH has engaged in ‘massive spoliation’ when in fact that false conclusion comes from the ‘work’ of a Special Master that was unlawfully appointed by Lindsay and who is the very subject of the pending writs of mandamus. Bad, bad VA trying to taint the new Judge’s view of CBS and AH by slipping false and inflammatory and irrelevant one-liners into a Court doc. - CBS and AH also point out that VA has sued many of the same defendants before in the ‘Mommie Dearest’ case which was dismissed with prejudice. The time has come to discuss ‘the truth’ that was dragged out of VA, McCabe and others in the big court. - Just as VA wanted a continuance claiming to need 30 days to write a surreply; a surreply she filed the same day as the Motion asking for 30 days to write it; we see VA saying deadlines need to be extended for such things as naming an expert witness when she already has named an expert witness. Does VA assume the new Judge is no different than the old Judge? • Time for VA to show up in Court and explain herself. Posted at 7:27PM on Nov 19th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/44#comments#ixzz0XMWesXiL CBS and AH call b.s. on VA’s Motion to change the pre-trial and trial dates for the ‘bloggers’ case; it’s a page-turner as legal docs go. The bottom line is that such a Motion cannot be set for submission (as it was), rather it must be set for an oral hearing as per Judge Weiman’s own procedural rules of which all parties are aware.

• ALL parties must be able to show up at a HEARING and go through this slug of a case in the open, fresh air of a new Court.

- CBS and AH point out the multiple mandamus proceedings and chastise VA for calling such writs a delay tactic of the defendants involved. Clearly the 1st COA and the TSC don’t indulge ‘delay’ tactics; they deal with important legal questions. VA is also chastised for saying AH has engaged in ‘massive spoliation’ when in fact that false conclusion comes from the ‘work’ of a Special Master that was unlawfully appointed by Lindsay and who is the very subject of the pending writs of mandamus. Bad, bad VA trying to taint the new Judge’s view of CBS and AH by slipping false and inflammatory and irrelevant one-liners into a Court doc.

- CBS and AH also point out that VA has sued many of the same defendants before in the ‘Mommie Dearest’ case which was dismissed with prejudice. The time has come to discuss ‘the truth’ that was dragged out of VA, McCabe and others in the big court.

- Just as VA wanted a continuance claiming to need 30 days to write a surreply; a surreply she filed the same day as the Motion asking for 30 days to write it; we see VA saying deadlines need to be extended for such things as naming an expert witness when she already has named an expert witness. Does VA assume the new Judge is no different than the old Judge?

• Time for VA to show up in Court and explain herself.

Posted at 7:27PM on Nov 19th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/44#comments#ixzz0XMWesXiL

]]> By: trina http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61016 trina Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:02:26 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61016 Kinda odd. Arthur says the two cases (Fed & State) are not related (enough), yet uses exhibits from the Federal case to furthur the causes of the State case? To defeat summary judgment? Real interesting. Kinda odd. Arthur says the two cases (Fed & State) are not related (enough), yet uses exhibits from the Federal case to furthur the causes of the State case? To defeat summary judgment? Real interesting.

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61015 Rose Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:44:08 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61015 November 19, 2009 Virgie Arthur Reply to CBS Response to Arthur’s Motion for a Continuance of CBS Motion for Summary Judgment calendared for November 16, which is based on CBS did not give the required statute time frame of twenty-one (21) days after filing a Motion for Summary Judgment before it can be put on a Court’s Submission Docket. http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2676 I am going to have to look up the statute quoted here and check the calculations later after TV. This is the last filing by either side today in Court. CYA be back after the Mentalist tonight on TV November 19, 2009 Virgie Arthur Reply to CBS Response to Arthur’s Motion for a Continuance of CBS Motion for Summary Judgment calendared for November 16, which is based on CBS did not give the required statute time frame of twenty-one (21) days after filing a Motion for Summary Judgment before it can be put on a Court’s Submission Docket.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2676

I am going to have to look up the statute quoted here and check the calculations later after TV. This is the last filing by either side today in Court.

CYA be back after the Mentalist tonight on TV

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61014 Rose Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:32:00 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61014 November 19, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Notice of Submission for December 8, on her Motion for Leave to File Late Evidence in part stating that CBS used a technicality when in fact CBS knew the tape of the Entertainment Tonight Show was authentic because CBS turned the DVD over to Arthur during the federal suit in 2008. http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2675 November 19, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Notice of Submission for December 8, on her Motion for Leave to File Late Evidence in part stating that CBS used a technicality when in fact CBS knew the tape of the Entertainment Tonight Show was authentic because CBS turned the DVD over to Arthur during the federal suit in 2008.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2675

]]> By: heath http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61013 heath Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:23:45 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61013 #76 NNNOOOOO Is that celsius or farenheight????? I hate the cold.. I am going to sit home with the air con and play computers and maybe read a bit..my guys are not home and I am not leaving my puppies to go and get real hot in the outside world unless it comes knocking. #76 NNNOOOOO

Is that celsius or farenheight????? I hate the cold..

I am going to sit home with the air con and play computers and maybe read a bit..my guys are not home and I am not leaving my puppies to go and get real hot in the outside world unless it comes knocking.

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61012 Rose Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:21:46 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61012 November 19, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Leave to File Late Evidence in part stating that CBS used a technicality when in fact CBS knew the tape of the Entertainment Tonight Show was authentic because CBS turned the DVD over to Arthur during the federal suit in 2008. http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2674 November 19, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Leave to File Late Evidence in part stating that CBS used a technicality when in fact CBS knew the tape of the Entertainment Tonight Show was authentic because CBS turned the DVD over to Arthur during the federal suit in 2008.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2674

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61011 Rose Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:58:43 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61011 November 19, 2009 CBS Objection to Virgie Arthur Motion for Continuance as being moot and about objecting to the evidence produced by Arthur in the Response to Summary Judgment Exhibit D the 80th District Court Order confirming trial date will remain May 2010. http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2673 November 19, 2009 CBS Objection to Virgie Arthur Motion for Continuance as being moot and about objecting to the evidence produced by Arthur in the Response to Summary Judgment Exhibit D the 80th District Court Order confirming trial date will remain May 2010.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2673

]]> By: Bewildered http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61010 Bewildered Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:57:35 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61010 Heath..fires are scary and with wind, you never know where their headed. Would you be more comfortable with 20 below? I'll share :lol: Heath..fires are scary and with wind, you never know where their headed. Would you be more comfortable with 20 below? I’ll share :lol:

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61009 Rose Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:53:57 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61009 November 19, 2009 CBS Objection to Virgie Arthur Motion for Continuance as being moot and about objecting to the evidence produced by Arthur in the Response to Summary Judgment Exhibit C the 80th District Court Docket Control Order http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2672 November 19, 2009 CBS Objection to Virgie Arthur Motion for Continuance as being moot and about objecting to the evidence produced by Arthur in the Response to Summary Judgment Exhibit C the 80th District Court Docket Control Order

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2672

]]> By: heath http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61008 heath Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:51:20 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61008 Rose just read your answer to Butterfly and I think your point number 19 says it all for me. Rose just read your answer to Butterfly and I think your point number 19 says it all for me.

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61007 Rose Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:47:32 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61007 November 19, 2009 CBS Objection to Virgie Arthur Motion for Continuance as being moot and about objecting to the evidence produced by Arthur in the Response to Summary Judgment Exhibit B the Supreme Court of Texas Emergency Stay for Writ of Mandamus. http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2672 November 19, 2009 CBS Objection to Virgie Arthur Motion for Continuance as being moot and about objecting to the evidence produced by Arthur in the Response to Summary Judgment Exhibit B the Supreme Court of Texas Emergency Stay for Writ of Mandamus.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2672

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61006 Rose Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:42:14 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61006 November 19, 2009 CBS Objection to Virgie Arthur Motion for Continuance as being moot and about objecting to the evidence produced by Arthur in the Response to Summary Judgment Exhibit A which is a copy of the 80th District Court Rules on Submissions and Hearings. http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2671 November 19, 2009 CBS Objection to Virgie Arthur Motion for Continuance as being moot and about objecting to the evidence produced by Arthur in the Response to Summary Judgment Exhibit A which is a copy of the 80th District Court Rules on Submissions and Hearings.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2671

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61005 Rose Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:37:30 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61005 November 19, 2009 CBS Objection to Virgie Arthur Motion for Continuance as being moot and about objecting to the evidence produced by Arthur in the Response to Summary Judgment. http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2670 November 19, 2009 CBS Objection to Virgie Arthur Motion for Continuance as being moot and about objecting to the evidence produced by Arthur in the Response to Summary Judgment.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2670

]]> By: heath http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61004 heath Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:33:06 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61004 I am have just been to supermarket to get supplies etc. When I got in my car the temperature outside was 47 celsius according to my instruments. It cooled to 43 as I got going and got into some shade. We here have no need to go as yet but noticed the fire fighters at the park near my home. Bet they are stationed everywhere.. I am glad I don't live further out of town. JMA I have often wondered at the manipulation that goes on and in hindsight it is really obvious. It will become personal attacks and they will take center stage over the story, deflecting from the facts. Hurt feelings and all the rest of it. Actually don't get me started. I am have just been to supermarket to get supplies etc. When I got in my car the temperature outside was 47 celsius according to my instruments. It cooled to 43 as I got going and got into some shade.

We here have no need to go as yet but noticed the fire fighters at the park near my home. Bet they are stationed everywhere..

I am glad I don’t live further out of town.

JMA I have often wondered at the manipulation that goes on and in hindsight it is really obvious. It will become personal attacks and they will take center stage over the story, deflecting from the facts. Hurt feelings and all the rest of it.

Actually don’t get me started.

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61003 Rose Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:45:47 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61003 November 16, 2009 Nelda "Rose" Turner's Notice of Related cases, Special Exception and Original Answer in Tarrant County to Teresa Stephens First Supplemental Complaint. http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2669 We are still attempting to reach a Rule 11 Agreement with Teresa Stephens so will have no comments on this suit but will be transparent and post the papers. I have read a draft of Emmett Glenn’s Answer and per his draft Stephens has promised him to Dismiss him from the case if he becomes a witness for her. Although I have not seen her Rule 11 Agreement to do that with him yet, but I am sure she is behind in filings in all of these overlapping cases. November 16, 2009 Nelda “Rose” Turner’s Notice of Related cases, Special Exception and Original Answer in Tarrant County to Teresa Stephens First Supplemental Complaint.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2669

We are still attempting to reach a Rule 11 Agreement with Teresa Stephens so will have no comments on this suit but will be transparent and post the papers. I have read a draft of Emmett Glenn’s Answer and per his draft Stephens has promised him to Dismiss him from the case if he becomes a witness for her. Although I have not seen her Rule 11 Agreement to do that with him yet, but I am sure she is behind in filings in all of these overlapping cases.

]]> By: JMA http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61002 JMA Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:38:46 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61002 heath [64] as difficult as it may seem you have the right idea by leaving your home, life is more precious than the material things, stay safe friend. heath [64] as difficult as it may seem you have the right idea by leaving your home, life is more precious than the material things, stay safe friend.

]]> By: JMA http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61001 JMA Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:34:42 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61001 heath [64] in reference to, “Wonder how many are playing 2 sides to keep it going?” I can name a few ;-) You know I’ve noticed some similarities in two of those people which makes me question are the same person using different monikers even while a member here cause I’m telling you all their writing patterns are a lot alike not to mention their gripe about this site and it’s owner. Nah I know they are two different people but damn that holier than thou act now that they are no longer members here is identical. Oops almost forgot and their identical undying love for VA. heath [64] in reference to, “Wonder how many are playing 2 sides to keep it going?” I can name a few ;-) You know I’ve noticed some similarities in two of those people which makes me question are the same person using different monikers even while a member here cause I’m telling you all their writing patterns are a lot alike not to mention their gripe about this site and it’s owner. Nah I know they are two different people but damn that holier than thou act now that they are no longer members here is identical. Oops almost forgot and their identical undying love for VA.

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-61000 Rose Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:16:28 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-61000 Oh Heath please be careful and ready to leave if you have to... one year when we had fires here we packed a bag of clothes, a bag of papers and mementos that could not be replaces and a few other things but things we could get to the car in one trip and then the dogs from out side... It took us about 1 week to pack the have to save bags.. I never realized we had so many important papers in so many different spots... But above all be safe, very safe... it seems in Aust. and Calif. the fires are getting worse and coming earlier in the year now... very very sad... :( Oh Heath please be careful and ready to leave if you have to… one year when we had fires here we packed a bag of clothes, a bag of papers and mementos that could not be replaces and a few other things but things we could get to the car in one trip and then the dogs from out side… It took us about 1 week to pack the have to save bags.. I never realized we had so many important papers in so many different spots…

But above all be safe, very safe… it seems in Aust. and Calif. the fires are getting worse and coming earlier in the year now… very very sad… :(

]]> By: JMA http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60999 JMA Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:15:14 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60999 DerertWalker [53] I saw that response and it does not surprise me they would come back with that due to I believe they sleep at their computer afraid they may miss something. Oh wait forget the sleeping part they’re too busy looking for faceless Bloggers personal info you know like real names or names they think belong to so and so. Bewildered [54] OMG are they ever it seems they leave no stone unturned either. First, they show their respect and give sympathy to the father and then within minutes they are picking him apart too. PS, Those Troll’s would argue with a rock in order to feed their superior complexes. DerertWalker [53] I saw that response and it does not surprise me they would come back with that due to I believe they sleep at their computer afraid they may miss something. Oh wait forget the sleeping part they’re too busy looking for faceless Bloggers personal info you know like real names or names they think belong to so and so.

Bewildered [54] OMG are they ever it seems they leave no stone unturned either. First, they show their respect and give sympathy to the father and then within minutes they are picking him apart too.

PS,

Those Troll’s would argue with a rock in order to feed their superior complexes.

]]> By: heath http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60998 heath Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:07:19 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60998 #59 Rose it is spooky all this coming out and maybe within all this we can find out our truth that happened here to so many.. but I bet we don't :( Wonder how many are playing 2 sides to keep it going? maybe someone in authority will take notice of the damage. Computer crime, stalking threats etc. Beth that is a good post of swims and it is good to have it here where it will be read by more people than an old thread at tmz. Thanks Swims :) Going to be very hot here to day, we have a heatwave in spring !! Meant to get to 38c and in some places it is already over 40c. Fires are already starting and they have asked people to leave their homes in high risk areas. We now have a catastrophic catergory and are already nearly there in some areas...no more staying with your home to fight the fire, the loss of life has been too high. Where I am the bushland is not far away. So I am going to close up the house and try to stay cool. We went through this not so long ago and it is starting so early in the year. #59 Rose it is spooky all this coming out and maybe within all this we can find out our truth that happened here to so many.. but I bet we don’t :(

Wonder how many are playing 2 sides to keep it going?

maybe someone in authority will take notice of the damage. Computer crime, stalking threats etc.

Beth that is a good post of swims and it is good to have it here where it will be read by more people than an old thread at tmz.

Thanks Swims :)

Going to be very hot here to day, we have a heatwave in spring !! Meant to get to 38c and in some places it is already over 40c. Fires are already starting and they have asked people to leave their homes in high risk areas. We now have a catastrophic catergory and are already nearly there in some areas…no more staying with your home to fight the fire, the loss of life has been too high.

Where I am the bushland is not far away. So I am going to close up the house and try to stay cool.

We went through this not so long ago and it is starting so early in the year.

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60997 Rose Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:00:15 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60997 Oh and DW, I went back and looked at all of the updated new set dates on all of these cases and I "think" (which can be dangerous on it's own) that the calendar is up to date now. WOW am I glad that we follow cases where there is paperwork and the Cummings case as sad as it is does not have any released paperwork yet unlike the Casey Anthony case we are still putting up paperwork weekly because so much is coming out to the public in Florida... Oh and DW, I went back and looked at all of the updated new set dates on all of these cases and I “think” (which can be dangerous on it’s own) that the calendar is up to date now.

WOW am I glad that we follow cases where there is paperwork and the Cummings case as sad as it is does not have any released paperwork yet unlike the Casey Anthony case we are still putting up paperwork weekly because so much is coming out to the public in Florida…

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60996 Rose Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:55:22 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60996 #57 Beth ".Hachette’s insurer is obligated to cover the costs of defense and settlement for Cosby unless Cosby ‘fires’ them and takes on the costs herself." Oh that is so sweet isn't it... maybe all of the truth the good, bad and ugly with those "sources" will now come out... #57 Beth “.Hachette’s insurer is obligated to cover the costs of defense and settlement for Cosby unless Cosby ‘fires’ them and takes on the costs herself.”

Oh that is so sweet isn’t it… maybe all of the truth the good, bad and ugly with those “sources” will now come out…

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60995 Rose Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:47:59 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60995 Oh and for fun, I forgot to add all of the slug fest between all of these bloggers occurred guess where????? the lovely anything goes "T" site... Yea I like being where I am now and yes #52 DW, YOU make sense I sure don't want to be dragged into this any more than I am now... but yes one day a cool analytical none angry article about when does journalism cross over to media "who---" and does a journalist if they take money as a media consultant owe a disclaimer in a case they blog about with "exclusives"... on a day when everything is documented, documented, documented and it is just analytical... not like this free for all of getting even that is happening on the Cummings case and bloggers... Energy is always better put to doing something positive blog wars or trying to settle scores... they must take their toll on those who do that on and on and on and on .... Oh and for fun, I forgot to add all of the slug fest between all of these bloggers occurred guess where????? the lovely anything goes “T” site…

Yea I like being where I am now and yes #52 DW, YOU make sense I sure don’t want to be dragged into this any more than I am now… but yes one day a cool analytical none angry article about when does journalism cross over to media “who—” and does a journalist if they take money as a media consultant owe a disclaimer in a case they blog about with “exclusives”… on a day when everything is documented, documented, documented and it is just analytical… not like this free for all of getting even that is happening on the Cummings case and bloggers…

Energy is always better put to doing something positive blog wars or trying to settle scores… they must take their toll on those who do that on and on and on and on ….

]]> By: BEVERLY http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60994 BEVERLY Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:40:30 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60994 BETH-----Man,do I love the part of Hachette Insurer is obligated to cover the defense and settlement for Cosby,unless Cosby fires them and covers her own costs.boy,this trial is in New York,where the public was made fool's of by Cosby and her 120% true facts, I do wonder how New Yorkers,feel about being used.to promote a book of lies.MY OPINION,,How would you feel being asked to promote and buy a book,that the (award winning journalist) knew was ALL LIES. What I also love is New York is where it is happening,You don't make it there,you won't make it anywhere. BETH—–Man,do I love the part of Hachette Insurer is obligated to cover the defense and settlement for Cosby,unless Cosby fires them and covers her own costs.boy,this trial is in New York,where the public was made fool’s of by Cosby and her 120% true facts, I do wonder how New Yorkers,feel about being used.to promote a book of lies.MY OPINION,,How would you feel being asked to promote and buy a book,that the (award winning journalist) knew was ALL LIES. What I also love is New York is where it is happening,You don’t make it there,you won’t make it anywhere.

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60993 Rose Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:36:15 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60993 And everyone is claiming hacking doctored emails ........ talk about déjà vu! This is great accusations that a forum is owned by a "high risk sex offender" and BLOG war at it's best or worse, with shooting statements back and forth from moderators, ex-moderators and those who just "care"... God I am glad we have the group we do... LOL http://everythingnews.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=picazio&action=display&thread=169 "Some of the more volatile claims Picazio made in the interview suggested that the blogger-in-question was also involved as a moderator for a Haleigh Cummings forum that was operated by a high-risk sex offender." Then the attorney shoots back and now the site is having their lawyers look at the flood of emails among the blogs... Mmmmmmm reminiscent of our suit with Havana and some others doesn't it. http://www.thesky973.com/pages/5716192.php And blogger network who was trashed by the lawyer is trying to stay above the fray and just report... Oh how well do I know how that owner must feel... http://www.bloggernews.net/123024 And everyone is claiming hacking doctored emails …….. talk about déjà vu!

This is great accusations that a forum is owned by a “high risk sex offender” and BLOG war at it’s best or worse, with shooting statements back and forth from moderators, ex-moderators and those who just “care”… God I am glad we have the group we do… LOL

http://everythingnews.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=picazio&action=display&thread=169

“Some of the more volatile claims Picazio made in the interview suggested that the blogger-in-question was also involved as a moderator for a Haleigh Cummings forum that was operated by a high-risk sex offender.”

Then the attorney shoots back and now the site is having their lawyers look at the flood of emails among the blogs… Mmmmmmm reminiscent of our suit with Havana and some others doesn’t it.

http://www.thesky973.com/pages/5716192.php

And blogger network who was trashed by the lawyer is trying to stay above the fray and just report… Oh how well do I know how that owner must feel…

http://www.bloggernews.net/123024

]]> By: Beth http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60991 Beth Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:55:54 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60991 *** Rose/Ken*** I reposted a great post from Swims.... (regarding the NY case) It has some words in it >> that got caught in your spaminatior or moderator thingy... ;) Thanks! :) *** Rose/Ken***

I reposted a great post from Swims…. (regarding the NY case)
It has some words in it >> that got caught in your spaminatior or moderator thingy… ;)

Thanks! :)

]]> By: Beth http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60990 Beth Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:52:22 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60990 * GREAT INFORMATIVE POST Regarding the NY Case--- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "..Hachette’s insurer is obligated to cover the costs of defense and settlement for Cosby unless Cosby ‘fires’ them and takes on the costs herself. The criminal and Cosby civil cases do not overlap in their subject matter. Here’s a refresher (my previous 3 part post) on what will be heard in NYC if Cosby goes to trial. Recall, Cosby has NO witnesses that have supported her; the Cosby case unredacted depos even show that people Cosby ‘quoted’ or alluded to are upset that she made their lies sound more preposterous than they already were. What will the Cosby Jury see and hear? Short Answer: What Judge Chin allows into evidence. Only the statements DENIED Summary Judgement (to Cosby) will have testimony and exhibits. Statements for which Cosby received summary judgement are OUT. • The Jury will therefore hear NOTHING about (using Statement numbers as in the written decision): #3, HKS and ANS’s drug use prior to and during her pregnancy; #4, Stern having Mark Hatten falsely arrested; #5, ANS and HKS conspiring to hire MH to murder E. Pierce Marshall; #6, HKS’s ET compensation; #9, the FS story about HKS flushing pills in The Bahamas; #10, HKS stealing money from ANS; #12, additional offers HKS may have made to LB for making him Executor of ANS’s Estate; and #14, the allegation that Daniel told ‘someone’ about HKS feeding ANS drugs and his being a Svengali. These statements are out because HKS provided no proof to back up his point of view that the statements were false; for the MH sourced materials, MH, even when wrong, is a principal relating his views directly to Cosby. The Jury will also not have readings of other peoples’ articles, blogs or TV appearances; first-hand information only. • What the Jury will hear: The Jury will hear about Jackie Hatten and her substantial contribution to the sex act (#1) statement and the ‘pimping’ statement (#8) and part of the murder allegations in Statements #15 -19. Well, if JH ever surfaces and comes to Court and convinces any one on the Jury that she is not nuts, Cosby might stand a slim to none chance. Of course JH disappeared the very day Cosby’s book was published and only called HKS/Wood once since that time but never showed for her own defamation suit or to give a deposition for Hachette or Cosby. The sex tape (#2) statement was sourced only by Clark & Vice and precipitated ‘nannygate’; use of those sources and the attempted bribery show actual malice Judge Chin opines. Will Clark & Vice appear at trial to testify? Where’s the tape? Neither can testify to what the nannies said, only what they personally know as a fact. Harding said Daniel told him (#7) that HKS ‘pimped’ his mother, and Cosby corroborated that statement with JH’s (#8). Harding says he made it up and JH is MIA. Cosby said LB told her (#11) that HKS perjured himself in Seidlin’s Court when he claimed to be DL’s father but LB denies he said it to her. Who will the Jury believe? Cosby says VA told her (#13) LB was being blackmailed by HKS for being gay. Will VA take the stand and would the Jury believe her in context? Will the jury believe VA or LB? Chin felt Cosby was reckless to have written anything VA told her. Statements #15 – 19 are from JH and VA and promoted on TV by Cosby and O’Q and deal with the murder allegations, dates on the will fax’d to HKS and how ANS’s ‘inner circle’ felt HKS was dangerous and was likely involved in ANS’s death and ANS yelling to HKS ‘you did this’, etc. Well, no JH, unlikely VA would show up or be believed and O’Q has already publicly filed papers in his FL case in which he admitted to having made it all up. Summary: Jackie Hatten, Harding, VA, Clark & Vice’s source materials are the ONLY materials that will be presented to the Jury. No lifestyle stuff, no ANS Show stuff, no talk of HKS’s parents and money laundering, no sex with the dog stuff, etc. Who among the above will satisfy the Jury that HKS and LB were witnessed having sex, that a sex tape exists, that HKS ‘pimped’ ANS, HKS perjured himself about being DL’s father, HKS blackmailed ‘gay’ LB or any of the inter-related murder allegations that even O’Q and Clark are on the public record as having said were false. No JH, Harding recanted, VA is brain damaged to some extent according to McCabe and recanted in the ‘Mommie Dearest’ case anyway and the Clark/Vice duo are not believable in anything they have ever said (even Chin noted Clark lied on TV regarding being a source for Cosby). Cosby has no pertinent witnesses. HKS has a long list of eye-witnesses and principals of the ANS saga on his side – the truth side. Posted on Nov 19th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean" * GREAT INFORMATIVE POST Regarding the NY Case—
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“..Hachette’s insurer is obligated to cover the costs of defense and settlement for Cosby unless Cosby ‘fires’ them and takes on the costs herself. The criminal and Cosby civil cases do not overlap in their subject matter. Here’s a refresher (my previous 3 part post) on what will be heard in NYC if Cosby goes to trial. Recall, Cosby has NO witnesses that have supported her; the Cosby case unredacted depos even show that people Cosby ‘quoted’ or alluded to are upset that she made their lies sound more preposterous than they already were.

What will the Cosby Jury see and hear?

Short Answer: What Judge Chin allows into evidence. Only the statements DENIED Summary Judgement (to Cosby) will have testimony and exhibits. Statements for which Cosby received summary judgement are OUT.

• The Jury will therefore hear NOTHING about (using Statement numbers as in the written decision):

#3, HKS and ANS’s drug use prior to and during her pregnancy; #4, Stern having Mark Hatten falsely arrested; #5, ANS and HKS conspiring to hire MH to murder E. Pierce Marshall; #6, HKS’s ET compensation; #9, the FS story about HKS flushing pills in The Bahamas; #10, HKS stealing money from ANS; #12, additional offers HKS may have made to LB for making him Executor of ANS’s Estate; and #14, the allegation that Daniel told ‘someone’ about HKS feeding ANS drugs and his being a Svengali. These statements are out because HKS provided no proof to back up his point of view that the statements were false; for the MH sourced materials, MH, even when wrong, is a principal relating his views directly to Cosby.

The Jury will also not have readings of other peoples’ articles, blogs or TV appearances; first-hand information only.

• What the Jury will hear:

The Jury will hear about Jackie Hatten and her substantial contribution to the sex act (#1) statement and the ‘pimping’ statement (#8) and part of the murder allegations in Statements #15 -19. Well, if JH ever surfaces and comes to Court and convinces any one on the Jury that she is not nuts, Cosby might stand a slim to none chance. Of course JH disappeared the very day Cosby’s book was published and only called HKS/Wood once since that time but never showed for her own defamation suit or to give a deposition for Hachette or Cosby.

The sex tape (#2) statement was sourced only by Clark & Vice and precipitated ‘nannygate’; use of those sources and the attempted bribery show actual malice Judge Chin opines. Will Clark & Vice appear at trial to testify? Where’s the tape? Neither can testify to what the nannies said, only what they personally know as a fact.

Harding said Daniel told him (#7) that HKS ‘pimped’ his mother, and Cosby corroborated that statement with JH’s (#8). Harding says he made it up and JH is MIA.

Cosby said LB told her (#11) that HKS perjured himself in Seidlin’s Court when he claimed to be DL’s father but LB denies he said it to her. Who will the Jury believe?

Cosby says VA told her (#13) LB was being blackmailed by HKS for being gay. Will VA take the stand and would the Jury believe her in context? Will the jury believe VA or LB? Chin felt Cosby was reckless to have written anything VA told her.

Statements #15 – 19 are from JH and VA and promoted on TV by Cosby and O’Q and deal with the murder allegations, dates on the will fax’d to HKS and how ANS’s ‘inner circle’ felt HKS was dangerous and was likely involved in ANS’s death and ANS yelling to HKS ‘you did this’, etc. Well, no JH, unlikely VA would show up or be believed and O’Q has already publicly filed papers in his FL case in which he admitted to having made it all up.

Summary:

Jackie Hatten, Harding, VA, Clark & Vice’s source materials are the ONLY materials that will be presented to the Jury. No lifestyle stuff, no ANS Show stuff, no talk of HKS’s parents and money laundering, no sex with the dog stuff, etc.

Who among the above will satisfy the Jury that HKS and LB were witnessed having sex, that a sex tape exists, that HKS ‘pimped’ ANS, HKS perjured himself about being DL’s father, HKS blackmailed ‘gay’ LB or any of the inter-related murder allegations that even O’Q and Clark are on the public record as having said were false. No JH, Harding recanted, VA is brain damaged to some extent according to McCabe and recanted in the ‘Mommie Dearest’ case anyway and the Clark/Vice duo are not believable in anything they have ever said (even Chin noted Clark lied on TV regarding being a source for Cosby).

Cosby has no pertinent witnesses. HKS has a long list of eye-witnesses and principals of the ANS saga on his side – the truth side.

Posted on Nov 19th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean”

]]> By: BEVERLY http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60989 BEVERLY Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:42:10 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60989 Well,E-Entertainment was running the life and death of Anna Nicole this afternoon.and as I was listening again.I heard Vergie criticize,her daughter (again) by holding a commitment ceremony after Daniel death,Vergie complains Anna is showing no respect for her son,Again that BIG MOUTH of Vergie;I quess with TWO DEATHS her daughter and Grandson,Vergie felt she was showing respect by attending a book signing party,that belittled her daughter,Vergie loved the book. Well,E-Entertainment was running the life and death of Anna Nicole this afternoon.and as I was listening again.I heard Vergie criticize,her daughter (again) by holding a commitment ceremony after Daniel death,Vergie complains Anna is showing no respect for her son,Again that BIG MOUTH of Vergie;I quess with TWO DEATHS her daughter and Grandson,Vergie felt she was showing respect by attending a book signing party,that belittled her daughter,Vergie loved the book.

]]> By: DesertWalker http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60988 DesertWalker Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:36:48 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60988 Aw Bewildered ... I couldn't agree more. Aw Bewildered … I couldn’t agree more.

]]> By: Bewildered http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60987 Bewildered Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:12:39 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60987 No DW...it needed to be said. For those of us on the outside, looking in, it just makes you shake your head or as my name says..Bewildered :lol: Can I do armchair psycology from a distance..you betcha. But when I do that, it makes me sad for the human condition and what we've become. As in the other case that Art's reported on, the blogger that threw herself in the media to answer questions, wants to write a book? , spilling things online as either fact or fictional, more so flying by the seat of her pants. Reminds me of another that did the same. And it's happening again, as another poor child hits the news and the saviors are picking at the bones already. Just makes me sad. No DW…it needed to be said. For those of us on the outside, looking in, it just makes you shake your head or as my name says..Bewildered :lol: Can I do armchair psycology from a distance..you betcha. But when I do that, it makes me sad for the human condition and what we’ve become. As in the other case that Art’s reported on, the blogger that threw herself in the media to answer questions, wants to write a book? , spilling things online as either fact or fictional, more so flying by the seat of her pants. Reminds me of another that did the same. And it’s happening again, as another poor child hits the news and the saviors are picking at the bones already. Just makes me sad.

]]> By: DesertWalker http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60986 DesertWalker Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:59:52 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60986 47-JMA ... some don't have to worry about it ... they never turn their computers off :wink: 47-JMA … some don’t have to worry about it … they never turn their computers off :wink:

]]> By: DesertWalker http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60985 DesertWalker Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:58:29 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60985 #45 - Aw Rose, call me an idiot, and you may be right, but I have to believe that on some level all of us, even those who support the other side, have heavy hearts about what ALL of the defendants in the cases are going through. Even those who have high powered representation have to be scared. Let's face it, each defendant feels they're in the right and each is fearful the Courts won't find it that way. We may have a soft spot for a particular defendant or defendants but all the defendants have to be questioning the past and their decisions. Being a per se defendant adds even more fear and vulnerability. We know that sometimes even innocent people are found culpable. As far as RC and AH ... each has decided the guidelines they'll follow in their journalistic careers. They'll have to answer to their peers and readership as to whether their guidelines were professional and credible or not. As to the specific advice you were given ... we hear advice everyday. It's up to us to decide whether the person offering it is worthy to give valuable advice or not. THEN we decide if this bit of advice their offering is worthy of taking to heart. That's why our folks taught us to make our own personal guidelines in life. It's helps us keep checks and balances. If you react now out of anger or frustration ....?? So many love your blogs but sometimes the publicity they achieve may be contrary to your best interest in the legal proceedings. Keep your overall goal in mind and don't let the little things distract you from that. Since I seem to be into platitudes today ... This old lady's advice would be ... don't throw out the baby with the bath water. Keep your cool. Having said that, JMA and I and all your readers would sure, by golly, enjoy reading a cool, calm, collected, detached and analytical review of the journalism vs media consultant position and the different ramifications those positions have on a case. :lol: (I even crack me up sometimes) #45 – Aw Rose, call me an idiot, and you may be right, but I have to believe that on some level all of us, even those who support the other side, have heavy hearts about what ALL of the defendants in the cases are going through. Even those who have high powered representation have to be scared. Let’s face it, each defendant feels they’re in the right and each is fearful the Courts won’t find it that way. We may have a soft spot for a particular defendant or defendants but all the defendants have to be questioning the past and their decisions. Being a per se defendant adds even more fear and vulnerability. We know that sometimes even innocent people are found culpable.

As far as RC and AH … each has decided the guidelines they’ll follow in their journalistic careers. They’ll have to answer to their peers and readership as to whether their guidelines were professional and credible or not. As to the specific advice you were given … we hear advice everyday. It’s up to us to decide whether the person offering it is worthy to give valuable advice or not. THEN we decide if this bit of advice their offering is worthy of taking to heart. That’s why our folks taught us to make our own personal guidelines in life. It’s helps us keep checks and balances.

If you react now out of anger or frustration ….??

So many love your blogs but sometimes the publicity they achieve may be contrary to your best interest in the legal proceedings. Keep your overall goal in mind and don’t let the little things distract you from that. Since I seem to be into platitudes today … This old lady’s advice would be … don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. Keep your cool.

Having said that, JMA and I and all your readers would sure, by golly, enjoy reading a cool, calm, collected, detached and analytical review of the journalism vs media consultant position and the different ramifications those positions have on a case. :lol: (I even crack me up sometimes)

]]> By: DesertWalker http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60984 DesertWalker Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:27:57 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60984 #44-Bewildered, :lol: Beats me why I decided to really read back over there this morning to see if I'd missed anything important. Guess I didn't scroll through fast enough this time. I can't even fathom that the same people I've posted with for so long have sunk to those depths. Sure, we all lose our patience at times but that hatefulness goes on day after day now. Don't get me started again ... I've said more than I should have already. #44-Bewildered, :lol: Beats me why I decided to really read back over there this morning to see if I’d missed anything important. Guess I didn’t scroll through fast enough this time. I can’t even fathom that the same people I’ve posted with for so long have sunk to those depths. Sure, we all lose our patience at times but that hatefulness goes on day after day now. Don’t get me started again … I’ve said more than I should have already.

]]> By: DesertWalker http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60983 DesertWalker Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:17:52 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60983 #43-JMA ... don't go jumpin' to conclusions :lol: #43-JMA … don’t go jumpin’ to conclusions :lol:

]]> By: Rose http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60982 Rose Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:42:07 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60982 #46 Bewildered the answers to all of your questions is YES Babcock used to be a sports broadcaster at college even. I would hope that each of you might one day see the "real" behind the scenes of two powerful law firms... O'Q had friends in high places but so does Babcock... he is openly called "the hire gun" sits on the SCOT advisory committee and is chair of it so they all know him by "Chip", and he is the go to guy here in Texas for any appellate judge who needs the "best" to save them... so he has a few cards to call in as well if needed... although the SCOT one judge that used Babcock has recused himself from this case... but still as the rest of us sit back and watch the filings it is about money and power and dueling banjos especially with CBS and how much money do they throw at this and do they have the staying power to see the O'Q law firm dissolved... this is almost getting to the courtroom version of "chicken" to the CBS lawyers and the VA lawyers... And as I just said that I have new state papers that just came in from one side with the other side saying they will be filing new ones today also... :roll: #46 Bewildered the answers to all of your questions is YES Babcock used to be a sports broadcaster at college even.

I would hope that each of you might one day see the “real” behind the scenes of two powerful law firms… O’Q had friends in high places but so does Babcock… he is openly called “the hire gun” sits on the SCOT advisory committee and is chair of it so they all know him by “Chip”, and he is the go to guy here in Texas for any appellate judge who needs the “best” to save them… so he has a few cards to call in as well if needed… although the SCOT one judge that used Babcock has recused himself from this case… but still as the rest of us sit back and watch the filings it is about money and power and dueling banjos especially with CBS and how much money do they throw at this and do they have the staying power to see the O’Q law firm dissolved… this is almost getting to the courtroom version of “chicken” to the CBS lawyers and the VA lawyers…

And as I just said that I have new state papers that just came in from one side with the other side saying they will be filing new ones today also… :roll:

]]> By: JMA http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60981 JMA Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:12:22 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60981 Rose [45] you hit the nail right on the head with this “thrown into this as I have to obtain state jurisdiction” without you and the two other defendants this case would not have seen a Texas courtroom hell no courtroom for that matter. Oh and we all know why it got as far as it did for the Plaintiff or should I say the Plaintiff’s Council, does friends in high places ring a bell. Rose [45] you hit the nail right on the head with this “thrown into this as I have to obtain state jurisdiction” without you and the two other defendants this case would not have seen a Texas courtroom hell no courtroom for that matter. Oh and we all know why it got as far as it did for the Plaintiff or should I say the Plaintiff’s Council, does friends in high places ring a bell.

]]> By: JMA http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60980 JMA Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:03:14 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60980 Bewildered [44] I agree that was an excellent post written by DW [elsewhere] but of course it was followed with the usual negativity. IMO many of those posters over there are not interested in any of the cases at hand, nope all they are interested in is snooping into other bloggers personal lives, it’s disgusting. DW ~~ I agree with you and ask the same question, how do they sleep at night once their computers are turned off especially knowing all the dirty deeds they have done and continue to do. Bewildered [44] I agree that was an excellent post written by DW [elsewhere] but of course it was followed with the usual negativity. IMO many of those posters over there are not interested in any of the cases at hand, nope all they are interested in is snooping into other bloggers personal lives, it’s disgusting.

DW ~~ I agree with you and ask the same question, how do they sleep at night once their computers are turned off especially knowing all the dirty deeds they have done and continue to do.

]]> By: Bewildered http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/18/all-things-anna-nicole-smith-newest-filings-in-south-carolina-and-harris-county-texas/#comment-60979 Bewildered Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:54:34 +0000 http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2468#comment-60979 And that is the only reason you and the other pro se defendants have been added. That was giggled upon so long ago. Wondering if these motions that keep piling up..so legal fees can be paid by the loser? What a way to make a payday. Also if these lawyers were ever involved in competitive sports? Instead of touchdowns, and hoops, the war is played with words. Wonder if they get an adrenaline rush if they think they've 'hit the mark' with each filing? It really isn't about 'helping the little guy' it's about 'the green'. No wonder lawyers have such a bad rep. And that is the only reason you and the other pro se defendants have been added. That was giggled upon so long ago.

Wondering if these motions that keep piling up..so legal fees can be paid by the loser? What a way to make a payday.

Also if these lawyers were ever involved in competitive sports? Instead of touchdowns, and hoops, the war is played with words. Wonder if they get an adrenaline rush if they think they’ve ‘hit the mark’ with each filing? It really isn’t about ‘helping the little guy’ it’s about ‘the green’. No wonder lawyers have such a bad rep.

]]>