<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newest Filings in Multiple Courts involving Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate and Texas Court Filings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/</link>
	<description>Celebrity and High Profile Lawsuits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60839</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60839</guid>
		<description>New article up on the Hollywood Madam being sentenced today and why does her brother a California attorney is not getting slapped for being part of her &quot;ring&quot; and not said to be smart enough to know better..... Mmmmmmmmm that is not what they are saying about HKS is it?

I am feeling better today, still very weak and not able to drink coffee but I am at least up for part of the day.

We should have new files in Harris County today and of course in S. C. I will have those up when they come in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New article up on the Hollywood Madam being sentenced today and why does her brother a California attorney is not getting slapped for being part of her &#8220;ring&#8221; and not said to be smart enough to know better&#8230;.. Mmmmmmmmm that is not what they are saying about HKS is it?</p>
<p>I am feeling better today, still very weak and not able to drink coffee but I am at least up for part of the day.</p>
<p>We should have new files in Harris County today and of course in S. C. I will have those up when they come in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heath</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60836</link>
		<dc:creator>heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60836</guid>
		<description>I am hanging around in chat if anyone has the time :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hanging around in chat if anyone has the time <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMA</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60833</link>
		<dc:creator>JMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60833</guid>
		<description>Wow hate when I miss a day here cause I get so far behind on conversations.

hmm [22] wow big baby girl.

Beth [23] my middle child was my biggest 8lbs 1oz but now she is my smallest 5’ 2” 95lbs her older sister who is now 5’ 10” and younger brother who is now 6’ have always towered over her but she never took any crap from them or anyone else, I always called her my little firecracker. Oh and I delivered her natural no drugs. 

Liann [39] I read those posts too about missing pages from Baker’s sworn statement, wonder what happen to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow hate when I miss a day here cause I get so far behind on conversations.</p>
<p>hmm [22] wow big baby girl.</p>
<p>Beth [23] my middle child was my biggest 8lbs 1oz but now she is my smallest 5’ 2” 95lbs her older sister who is now 5’ 10” and younger brother who is now 6’ have always towered over her but she never took any crap from them or anyone else, I always called her my little firecracker. Oh and I delivered her natural no drugs. </p>
<p>Liann [39] I read those posts too about missing pages from Baker’s sworn statement, wonder what happen to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60828</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60828</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the December hearing a walk through to say not guilty again, meet with the judge that will handle the trial, set deadlines for discovery and Motion to Dismiss etc. and then the trial will actually be the first of next year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the December hearing a walk through to say not guilty again, meet with the judge that will handle the trial, set deadlines for discovery and Motion to Dismiss etc. and then the trial will actually be the first of next year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BEVERLY</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60827</link>
		<dc:creator>BEVERLY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60827</guid>
		<description>Good Morning Everyone.As the State of Cal case against Dr Kappor,Dr E  and Howard Stern draws close,I would like to see professional medical Doctors,Nurses and Pharmacist testify,NOT people with agenda&#039;s or a axe to grind.NOT HEARSAY EVIDENCE,If Moe or anyone else said they saw Howard giving meds to Anna,it was up to Moe as a bodyguard for Anna to question what was going on right then and there.same with Vergie Arthur,I have not yet read one positive action Vergie took to help her daughter.I wish this was going to be on TV,AS A TEACHING TOOL.and I have so many questions,of all the doctors actions.Anna had a strong will of her own,and money to get what she wanted,and as much as Howard was living with her,Anna and what went on with her doctors,Howard had no say in.I SO AGREE with Swims,this should be handled by the MEDICAL BOARD.I have never in my entire life seen so much torment heaped on a man,for vengeance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Everyone.As the State of Cal case against Dr Kappor,Dr E  and Howard Stern draws close,I would like to see professional medical Doctors,Nurses and Pharmacist testify,NOT people with agenda&#8217;s or a axe to grind.NOT HEARSAY EVIDENCE,If Moe or anyone else said they saw Howard giving meds to Anna,it was up to Moe as a bodyguard for Anna to question what was going on right then and there.same with Vergie Arthur,I have not yet read one positive action Vergie took to help her daughter.I wish this was going to be on TV,AS A TEACHING TOOL.and I have so many questions,of all the doctors actions.Anna had a strong will of her own,and money to get what she wanted,and as much as Howard was living with her,Anna and what went on with her doctors,Howard had no say in.I SO AGREE with Swims,this should be handled by the MEDICAL BOARD.I have never in my entire life seen so much torment heaped on a man,for vengeance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liann</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60826</link>
		<dc:creator>Liann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60826</guid>
		<description>Beth #48, God Bless you!, I just lose my mind because I have spent so much money on this machine, I have a love hate relationship with my computer, when I was using Internet explorer 7 I was having so many problems so I switched to a new browser and Hibeeb (Bob) from Dell whom I can&#039;t understand, (no offense Bob) told me to not allow auto updates and I thought things would just be the same but I am told now that is not the case, I just had my computer set back to manufacture specs, I think that was in May, the problem with me is because I am not computer smart I envision cost and bs and that just makes me want to pull my hair out :lol:, I will start working on my computer problems come Monday, I tried today but kids and distractions, I will get this resolved, Thank you all for any advise. Thanks again Beth for the link.

Ken, thank you, I did not mean to imply anything about here, sorry if it read that way. I know you and Rose don&#039;t hint, You both are straight up and that is another thing I totally respect you both for.

Rose I hope you are feeling better and Ken your grandmother is in my prayers.

I hope everyone is well!. Beth, Sammy, Heath, Rox and anyone else that wants to join I hope to make it to chat tomorrow. ~~ Rosespeaks Rocks~~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth #48, God Bless you!, I just lose my mind because I have spent so much money on this machine, I have a love hate relationship with my computer, when I was using Internet explorer 7 I was having so many problems so I switched to a new browser and Hibeeb (Bob) from Dell whom I can&#8217;t understand, (no offense Bob) told me to not allow auto updates and I thought things would just be the same but I am told now that is not the case, I just had my computer set back to manufacture specs, I think that was in May, the problem with me is because I am not computer smart I envision cost and bs and that just makes me want to pull my hair out <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> , I will start working on my computer problems come Monday, I tried today but kids and distractions, I will get this resolved, Thank you all for any advise. Thanks again Beth for the link.</p>
<p>Ken, thank you, I did not mean to imply anything about here, sorry if it read that way. I know you and Rose don&#8217;t hint, You both are straight up and that is another thing I totally respect you both for.</p>
<p>Rose I hope you are feeling better and Ken your grandmother is in my prayers.</p>
<p>I hope everyone is well!. Beth, Sammy, Heath, Rox and anyone else that wants to join I hope to make it to chat tomorrow. ~~ Rosespeaks Rocks~~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixiesmom50</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60824</link>
		<dc:creator>pixiesmom50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60824</guid>
		<description>with MJ case they have enough evident that the doctor was wrong but they want to accuse him of murder not mistake .as for HS it was because they want a name and face time they know this people did not want to harm Anna she just needed the medication it not she died with illegal drugs like Moe was tying to lie about the shot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with MJ case they have enough evident that the doctor was wrong but they want to accuse him of murder not mistake .as for HS it was because they want a name and face time they know this people did not want to harm Anna she just needed the medication it not she died with illegal drugs like Moe was tying to lie about the shot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60822</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60822</guid>
		<description>Repost of of a VERY GOOD Comment!

(LOL on the part of JH as a muse, and the &quot;experts&quot; not saying what the DA wants them to say! (sound familiar?) &gt; HKS &amp; the Doctors...)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
&quot;615. A new story on TMZ is telling:

http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/14/michael-jackson-dr-conrad-murray-propofo-death-investigation-manslaughter-applied-pharmacy-o-j-simpson/

Excerpts:

“But the source added, &quot;There is not a problem with the case. Time is on our side. We want to do this right.&quot; The L.A. County D.A.&#039;s office and the LAPD are working as a unit to &quot;anticipate defense strategies and prepare for them.&quot; The D.A.&#039;s office is actively involved, requesting lots of info from the LAPD.”
…
“Another issue: authorities have gone back to their medical experts for more input, as &quot;strategies have changed&quot; in a case they call &quot;very complicated.&quot;”

The DA is delaying in order to anticipate defense strategies? The ‘medical experts’ are not saying what the lawyers want them to say; poor babies; what will they do? It’s déjà vu all over again. 

If only the DA could find ‘someone’ to ‘coordinate’ witnesses and evidence for them. Surely there is some as yet unknown but omnipotent Svengali type who is ‘responsible’ and ‘conspired’ to drug MJ against his wishes. Has the DA spoken with JB’s muse, JH, yet? She might be a secret godmother to at least one of MJ’s kids. In such a large family there must be at least one estranged relative from far back in the day who miraculously has the inside scope. Maybe the DA can find someone who picked up a prescription somewhere sometime; ‘someone’ must have opened a bottle and ‘administered’ its content. With millions of photographs taken over the decades surely someone could put together a collection of pictures with MJ’s eyes half-opened or a strange look on his face; that should make the DA’s case right there.  Posted on Nov 14th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repost of of a VERY GOOD Comment!</p>
<p>(LOL on the part of JH as a muse, and the &#8220;experts&#8221; not saying what the DA wants them to say! (sound familiar?) &gt; HKS &amp; the Doctors&#8230;)</p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
&#8220;615. A new story on TMZ is telling:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/14/michael-jackson-dr-conrad-murray-propofo-death-investigation-manslaughter-applied-pharmacy-o-j-simpson/">http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/14/michael-jackson-dr-conrad-murray-propofo-death-investigation-manslaughter-applied-pharmacy-o-j-simpson/</a></p>
<p>Excerpts:</p>
<p>“But the source added, &#8220;There is not a problem with the case. Time is on our side. We want to do this right.&#8221; The L.A. County D.A.&#8217;s office and the LAPD are working as a unit to &#8220;anticipate defense strategies and prepare for them.&#8221; The D.A.&#8217;s office is actively involved, requesting lots of info from the LAPD.”<br />
…<br />
“Another issue: authorities have gone back to their medical experts for more input, as &#8220;strategies have changed&#8221; in a case they call &#8220;very complicated.&#8221;”</p>
<p>The DA is delaying in order to anticipate defense strategies? The ‘medical experts’ are not saying what the lawyers want them to say; poor babies; what will they do? It’s déjà vu all over again. </p>
<p>If only the DA could find ‘someone’ to ‘coordinate’ witnesses and evidence for them. Surely there is some as yet unknown but omnipotent Svengali type who is ‘responsible’ and ‘conspired’ to drug MJ against his wishes. Has the DA spoken with JB’s muse, JH, yet? She might be a secret godmother to at least one of MJ’s kids. In such a large family there must be at least one estranged relative from far back in the day who miraculously has the inside scope. Maybe the DA can find someone who picked up a prescription somewhere sometime; ‘someone’ must have opened a bottle and ‘administered’ its content. With millions of photographs taken over the decades surely someone could put together a collection of pictures with MJ’s eyes half-opened or a strange look on his face; that should make the DA’s case right there.  Posted on Nov 14th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60821</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60821</guid>
		<description>LOL *Witch* s/b Which... must have been subliminal. ;)

Have a good day all! 
bbl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL *Witch* s/b Which&#8230; must have been subliminal. ;)</p>
<p>Have a good day all!<br />
bbl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60820</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60820</guid>
		<description>CBS RESPONSE:
Footnote Pg. 7:

“CBS has objected to Exhibit E of Arthur’s Response on the ground that it is not properly authenticated and the records referred to are not attached as required. 
CBS has objected to Exhibit H of Arthur’s Response on the ground that it is conclusory, fails to authenticate the attached DVD’s, and fails to satisfy best evidence requirements. CBS’s Objections to Evidence Submitted with Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for Final Summary Judgment have been filed contemporaneously herewith and are incorporated herein by reference.”

http://definitions.uslegal.com/b/best-evidence/
“Best evidence refers to a rule of evidence that requires an original of a writing, recording, or photograph in order to prove its content.”

 http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/evidence
“Any matter of fact that a party to a lawsuit offers to prove or disprove an issue in the case. A system of rules and standards that is used to determine which facts may be admitted, and to what extent a judge or jury may consider those facts, as proof of a particular issue in a lawsuit.”

“Hearsay” *(Witch does apply to the blogger’s sworn statements - IMO)*
“The credibility of any witness&#039;s testimony depends upon three factors: 
(1) whether the witness accurately perceived what he or she described; 
(2) whether the witness retained an accurate memory of that perception; and 
(3) whether the witness&#039;s narration accurately conveys that perception. 

In order to be allowed to testify, the witness generally must take an oath, must be personally present at the trial, and must be subjected to cross-examination. 
These conditions promote the factors that lend themselves to the witness&#039;s credibility...”
^^^^
Those stretched, false sworn statements by qv and havana &gt;&gt; WILL NEVER be allowed in Court AND the TX people (firm/lawyers) ALWAYS KNEW THIS!
* Again, it (the case) WAS NEVER about VA!!!
What a disappointment to her 5 supporters.... :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS RESPONSE:<br />
Footnote Pg. 7:</p>
<p>“CBS has objected to Exhibit E of Arthur’s Response on the ground that it is not properly authenticated and the records referred to are not attached as required.<br />
CBS has objected to Exhibit H of Arthur’s Response on the ground that it is conclusory, fails to authenticate the attached DVD’s, and fails to satisfy best evidence requirements. CBS’s Objections to Evidence Submitted with Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for Final Summary Judgment have been filed contemporaneously herewith and are incorporated herein by reference.”</p>
<p><a href="http://definitions.uslegal.com/b/best-evidence/">http://definitions.uslegal.com/b/best-evidence/</a><br />
“Best evidence refers to a rule of evidence that requires an original of a writing, recording, or photograph in order to prove its content.”</p>
<p> <a href="http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/evidence">http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/evidence</a><br />
“Any matter of fact that a party to a lawsuit offers to prove or disprove an issue in the case. A system of rules and standards that is used to determine which facts may be admitted, and to what extent a judge or jury may consider those facts, as proof of a particular issue in a lawsuit.”</p>
<p>“Hearsay” *(Witch does apply to the blogger’s sworn statements &#8211; IMO)*<br />
“The credibility of any witness&#8217;s testimony depends upon three factors:<br />
(1) whether the witness accurately perceived what he or she described;<br />
(2) whether the witness retained an accurate memory of that perception; and<br />
(3) whether the witness&#8217;s narration accurately conveys that perception. </p>
<p>In order to be allowed to testify, the witness generally must take an oath, must be personally present at the trial, and must be subjected to cross-examination.<br />
These conditions promote the factors that lend themselves to the witness&#8217;s credibility&#8230;”<br />
^^^^<br />
Those stretched, false sworn statements by qv and havana &gt;&gt; WILL NEVER be allowed in Court AND the TX people (firm/lawyers) ALWAYS KNEW THIS!<br />
* Again, it (the case) WAS NEVER about VA!!!<br />
What a disappointment to her 5 supporters&#8230;. <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60815</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60815</guid>
		<description>Liann,
I am not sure what browser you have...

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=how+to+turn+off+auto+fill+ins+on+your+browser&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=

On this link above, there are other links for: Google Chrome, Safari, ect... (HOW TO DISABLE AUTO-FILL-INS)

I noticed that when you type ‘repost’ that it is OK, the only thing I can think of is when you come on to completely take off your name and address &gt;
&gt; then type: Liann &amp; your address AGAIN in the box, that should make it OK for the rest of your comments you submit -- until you come on again. 
Sorry, for the tech troubles dear, they can be frustrating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liann,<br />
I am not sure what browser you have&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=how+to+turn+off+auto+fill+ins+on+your+browser&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=how+to+turn+off+auto+fill+ins+on+your+browser&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=</a></p>
<p>On this link above, there are other links for: Google Chrome, Safari, ect&#8230; (HOW TO DISABLE AUTO-FILL-INS)</p>
<p>I noticed that when you type ‘repost’ that it is OK, the only thing I can think of is when you come on to completely take off your name and address &gt;<br />
&gt; then type: Liann &amp; your address AGAIN in the box, that should make it OK for the rest of your comments you submit &#8212; until you come on again.<br />
Sorry, for the tech troubles dear, they can be frustrating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liann</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60814</link>
		<dc:creator>Liann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60814</guid>
		<description>I am not sure heath, Thanks, tomorrow I am going to get to the bottom of it and have my security and etc see what the heck the problem is, a virus check runs every-night, I just don&#039;t know. Thanks again, I love you guys and hate this stupid drama. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure heath, Thanks, tomorrow I am going to get to the bottom of it and have my security and etc see what the heck the problem is, a virus check runs every-night, I just don&#8217;t know. Thanks again, I love you guys and hate this stupid drama. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heath</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60813</link>
		<dc:creator>heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60813</guid>
		<description>Liann it is a browser thing...maybe


I have had this a few times myself.

Are you running another program or a virus check in the back ground? I found this windows thingy does an automatic defrag and I had no idea it was running  ....turned it off when nothing worked and couldn&#039;t even type a web addy..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liann it is a browser thing&#8230;maybe</p>
<p>I have had this a few times myself.</p>
<p>Are you running another program or a virus check in the back ground? I found this windows thingy does an automatic defrag and I had no idea it was running  &#8230;.turned it off when nothing worked and couldn&#8217;t even type a web addy..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: repost</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60812</link>
		<dc:creator>repost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60812</guid>
		<description>It is frustrating because honest this is the only site that I care about and I am not computer smart and I don&#039;t know why this seems to always be happening to me. I will mail tomorrow, Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is frustrating because honest this is the only site that I care about and I am not computer smart and I don&#8217;t know why this seems to always be happening to me. I will mail tomorrow, Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: repost</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60811</link>
		<dc:creator>repost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60811</guid>
		<description>Ken, Thanks, I don&#039;t understand, Thanks, I will e-mail tomorrow. I am just so frustrated, please understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, Thanks, I don&#8217;t understand, Thanks, I will e-mail tomorrow. I am just so frustrated, please understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60810</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60810</guid>
		<description>Liann [39] If it&#039;s a hint, it ain&#039;t coming from us, as we aren&#039;t doing anything to cause it nor are we trying to hint at anything.  As for your post #36, I dunno why it&#039;s messing up nor why it did that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liann [39] If it&#8217;s a hint, it ain&#8217;t coming from us, as we aren&#8217;t doing anything to cause it nor are we trying to hint at anything.  As for your post #36, I dunno why it&#8217;s messing up nor why it did that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: repost</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60809</link>
		<dc:creator>repost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60809</guid>
		<description>The AG is required to preserve the rights of the citizens, not his own.

As the tapes for JB-gate show, the moment Sadow called out JB for the political opportunist he is, JB told reporters repeatedly that he was only responsible for bringing the case to the DA; it was the DA who (magically on his own we are supposed to believe) brought the charges forward.

The AG is required to faithfully interpret and uphold the intent of the legislature not make new laws in his own head and charge people with them as his ambition and need for campaign financing dictates.

As the tapes show, JB was anxious to get headlines and be featured prominently in any reporting; hardly the actions of the ‘passive’ AG he claims to be.

A resignation would be more appropriate than a formal declaration of seeking the office of Governor.

Posted at 8:00PM on Nov 13th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/41#comments#ixzz0WoeZadI2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AG is required to preserve the rights of the citizens, not his own.</p>
<p>As the tapes for JB-gate show, the moment Sadow called out JB for the political opportunist he is, JB told reporters repeatedly that he was only responsible for bringing the case to the DA; it was the DA who (magically on his own we are supposed to believe) brought the charges forward.</p>
<p>The AG is required to faithfully interpret and uphold the intent of the legislature not make new laws in his own head and charge people with them as his ambition and need for campaign financing dictates.</p>
<p>As the tapes show, JB was anxious to get headlines and be featured prominently in any reporting; hardly the actions of the ‘passive’ AG he claims to be.</p>
<p>A resignation would be more appropriate than a formal declaration of seeking the office of Governor.</p>
<p>Posted at 8:00PM on Nov 13th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/41#comments#ixzz0WoeZadI2">http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/41#comments#ixzz0WoeZadI2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60808</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60808</guid>
		<description>Liann [40] It could be something with your browser and it trying to autofill the boxes. I&#039;ve checked the site and haven&#039;t found anything out of whack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liann [40] It could be something with your browser and it trying to autofill the boxes. I&#8217;ve checked the site and haven&#8217;t found anything out of whack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liann</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60807</link>
		<dc:creator>Liann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60807</guid>
		<description>after I just posted #39, I see in the name box it is merging my name and e-mail address together and I didn&#039;t touch those boxes. it is not because I am doing something. this is uncool I really like this site, bummer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after I just posted #39, I see in the name box it is merging my name and e-mail address together and I didn&#8217;t touch those boxes. it is not because I am doing something. this is uncool I really like this site, bummer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liann</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60805</link>
		<dc:creator>Liann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60805</guid>
		<description>I just saw my post #36, WTH? It did read... &quot;I for one think that this has been a really bad year and I can&#039;t wait for it to be over&quot;. 

I just don&#039;t understand why my posts and or name are wacky only on this site, I am logged in, I hope this is not a hint that I am not taking, I spell check, WTH?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw my post #36, WTH? It did read&#8230; &#8220;I for one think that this has been a really bad year and I can&#8217;t wait for it to be over&#8221;. </p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t understand why my posts and or name are wacky only on this site, I am logged in, I hope this is not a hint that I am not taking, I spell check, WTH?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liann</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60804</link>
		<dc:creator>Liann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60804</guid>
		<description>I have a question, The other day someone from the other side commented that in Arthur&#039;s filing on 11/9/09 Exhibit D sworn statement from Chrystal Baker that pages are missing, pages 30, 45, 47 and 49, so I went here and looked at her original sworn statement, and read the missing pages now I can&#039;t find the original sworn statement, maybe I just overlooked it. is all the filing still housed in the download section? TIA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question, The other day someone from the other side commented that in Arthur&#8217;s filing on 11/9/09 Exhibit D sworn statement from Chrystal Baker that pages are missing, pages 30, 45, 47 and 49, so I went here and looked at her original sworn statement, and read the missing pages now I can&#8217;t find the original sworn statement, maybe I just overlooked it. is all the filing still housed in the download section? TIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixiesmom50</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60803</link>
		<dc:creator>pixiesmom50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60803</guid>
		<description>still strange to me to see or read that they make HS like a doctor for Anna&#039;s drugs use and they only talk about HS I am talking about some sites equal him with MJ &#039;s doctor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still strange to me to see or read that they make HS like a doctor for Anna&#8217;s drugs use and they only talk about HS I am talking about some sites equal him with MJ &#8217;s doctor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liann</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60802</link>
		<dc:creator>Liann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60802</guid>
		<description>I just got on, I am going to try to read the new docs tonight

Rose you take care of you, Ken your grandmother is in my prayers, you all are in my prayers, everyone here at Rosespeaks.


I for one thn it is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got on, I am going to try to read the new docs tonight</p>
<p>Rose you take care of you, Ken your grandmother is in my prayers, you all are in my prayers, everyone here at Rosespeaks.</p>
<p>I for one thn it is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy1</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60801</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60801</guid>
		<description>Thank you Ken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Ken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60800</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60800</guid>
		<description>Sammy1, sent to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sammy1, sent to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60799</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60799</guid>
		<description>Bewildered I was thinking the same thing about New York unless they are all going to be filed as letters to the Court and then later released? Or could they be negotiating some serious money talk? I hope not, I would like to see the truth come out... 

Ok back to bed, I hate feeling like this, tomorrow is a new day and perhaps the a brighter one for a lot of us... so many ppl have lost many they cared about in the last 2 weeks... Ken&#039;s grandmother is having problems again and I am going back on chemo ... 

Some days you just want to pull the sheet over your head and not looking at anything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bewildered I was thinking the same thing about New York unless they are all going to be filed as letters to the Court and then later released? Or could they be negotiating some serious money talk? I hope not, I would like to see the truth come out&#8230; </p>
<p>Ok back to bed, I hate feeling like this, tomorrow is a new day and perhaps the a brighter one for a lot of us&#8230; so many ppl have lost many they cared about in the last 2 weeks&#8230; Ken&#8217;s grandmother is having problems again and I am going back on chemo &#8230; </p>
<p>Some days you just want to pull the sheet over your head and not looking at anything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy1</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60798</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60798</guid>
		<description>Ken - Yes, please reset for the main site.  If need be I can change it later.  Just want to read all the docs.
Thanks Ken - you&#039;re the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken &#8211; Yes, please reset for the main site.  If need be I can change it later.  Just want to read all the docs.<br />
Thanks Ken &#8211; you&#8217;re the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60797</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60797</guid>
		<description>Sammy1 [25] I don&#039;t have access to what your pw is. I would have to reset it for ya. Is it for the main site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sammy1 [25] I don&#8217;t have access to what your pw is. I would have to reset it for ya. Is it for the main site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bewildered</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60796</link>
		<dc:creator>Bewildered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60796</guid>
		<description>Thoroughly enjoyed CBS&#039;s latest..

Nothing from NY yet?

Congrats to your friend hmmm...I found out a few days ago, a new little one is expected into our circle, around June/July...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoroughly enjoyed CBS&#8217;s latest..</p>
<p>Nothing from NY yet?</p>
<p>Congrats to your friend hmmm&#8230;I found out a few days ago, a new little one is expected into our circle, around June/July&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60795</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60795</guid>
		<description>Sammy,
Yes I did. I think by amending the original petition, over and over; looking for loop-holes to add CBS, ect.. That the Plaintiff&#039;s counsel themselves cannot keep all of the &#039;BS&#039; straight! ;) An honest true observation.
TX seems to be trying to add the big Defendants like TMZ, CBS according to the STRETCHED, TWISTED STATEMENTS made by Havana and QV...
* Those false scenarios that the two bloggers put out there in hopes of getting rid of this site (my opinion) do not by law (legal statutes) apply to the actions of TMZ and CBS. Plaintiff cannot just lump all accusations to everyone. That is what I got out of it anyway.

I swear! Those sworn statements of those bloggers MEAN NOTHING! They are not legal depositions where both sides are present. They honestly do not hold any weight, ESPECIALLY the &#039;weight&#039; of keeping this frivolous case going. I mean just because these bloggers said this doesn&#039;t make it so, nor does any laws on the books say that everyone has to turn over their computer hard drives because of the accusations of conspiracy by two nutcases.

** LINDSAY had no legal authority by LAW to ORDER what she did!
&gt; This is why it is in the Higher Courts.

Most likely the new TX State Judge will grant the continuance, as what else can he do? 
I hope the 1st COA &gt;&gt; REVERSES all of TL&#039;s ridiculous orders than the case will be tossed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sammy,<br />
Yes I did. I think by amending the original petition, over and over; looking for loop-holes to add CBS, ect.. That the Plaintiff&#8217;s counsel themselves cannot keep all of the &#8216;BS&#8217; straight! ;) An honest true observation.<br />
TX seems to be trying to add the big Defendants like TMZ, CBS according to the STRETCHED, TWISTED STATEMENTS made by Havana and QV&#8230;<br />
* Those false scenarios that the two bloggers put out there in hopes of getting rid of this site (my opinion) do not by law (legal statutes) apply to the actions of TMZ and CBS. Plaintiff cannot just lump all accusations to everyone. That is what I got out of it anyway.</p>
<p>I swear! Those sworn statements of those bloggers MEAN NOTHING! They are not legal depositions where both sides are present. They honestly do not hold any weight, ESPECIALLY the &#8216;weight&#8217; of keeping this frivolous case going. I mean just because these bloggers said this doesn&#8217;t make it so, nor does any laws on the books say that everyone has to turn over their computer hard drives because of the accusations of conspiracy by two nutcases.</p>
<p>** LINDSAY had no legal authority by LAW to ORDER what she did!<br />
&gt; This is why it is in the Higher Courts.</p>
<p>Most likely the new TX State Judge will grant the continuance, as what else can he do?<br />
I hope the 1st COA &gt;&gt; REVERSES all of TL&#8217;s ridiculous orders than the case will be tossed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy1</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60794</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60794</guid>
		<description>Beth - did you read CBS Reply to Arthur&#039;s Response - pg 7, next to last paragraph, last sentence.

&quot;Statements that CBS did not make or publish but of which Arthur complains in her Response (at page 6), that other defendants set out to &quot;destroy&quot; Arthur and were desperate to find &quot;Virgie dirt&quot;, and to &quot;discredit&quot; her, are not actionable defamation for the same reasons.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth &#8211; did you read CBS Reply to Arthur&#8217;s Response &#8211; pg 7, next to last paragraph, last sentence.</p>
<p>&#8220;Statements that CBS did not make or publish but of which Arthur complains in her Response (at page 6), that other defendants set out to &#8220;destroy&#8221; Arthur and were desperate to find &#8220;Virgie dirt&#8221;, and to &#8220;discredit&#8221; her, are not actionable defamation for the same reasons.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60793</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60793</guid>
		<description>correction of 24.

&quot;..delays of data they did have to an expert ..&quot;
DELAYS OF DATA THEY DID NOT GIVE TO AN EXPERT; because...

Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction of 24.</p>
<p>&#8220;..delays of data they did have to an expert ..&#8221;<br />
DELAYS OF DATA THEY DID NOT GIVE TO AN EXPERT; because&#8230;</p>
<p>Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60792</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60792</guid>
		<description>Sammy,
Yes, Nancy Hamilton did a great job with her grounds she submitted, and backed those specific points up with case laws that actually apply to the situation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sammy,<br />
Yes, Nancy Hamilton did a great job with her grounds she submitted, and backed those specific points up with case laws that actually apply to the situation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy1</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60791</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60791</guid>
		<description>Beth, you&#039;re so much faster in reading these docs than I.  I&#039;m enjoying CBS&#039; latest filings.  Kinda cuts to the chase don&#039;t they?

Ken, I haven&#039;t received email from you with my password just in case you haven&#039;t checked yet.  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth, you&#8217;re so much faster in reading these docs than I.  I&#8217;m enjoying CBS&#8217; latest filings.  Kinda cuts to the chase don&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>Ken, I haven&#8217;t received email from you with my password just in case you haven&#8217;t checked yet.  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60790</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60790</guid>
		<description>* I finally did get the Motion for Continuance to load...

pg. 2 “Nearly a year ago, on December 1, 2008, Plaintiff Virgie Arthur designated John Mallery of BKD, LLP as an expert witness regarding computer forensics. Because of delays beyond Plaintiff’s control, Mr. Mallery has yet to receive data from the defendants for analysis, and he therefore would be unable to provide any meaning ful information, as...”

&gt; WHAT BS! TX had AH, BS computers! WHAT? They just let the info stay w/ Ball? BUSTED!
I bet they NEVER planned on giving any of the data to any expert! The whole thing was a fishing expedition from TX to find any/all info regarding ANS from HKS, his sister and LB. Stall tactics and delays of data they did have to an expert because VA was not their INITIAL CONCERN!!! IMO

CBS Response:
“What the Plaintiff fails to appreciate is that “unreasonable” interpretations of a publication, such as those advanced by Arthur here, do not create a fact issue sufficient to defeat summary judgment and are rejected as a matter of law.”

EXACTLY!!! As a matter of CASE LAW which is what a Judge as to refer to (not fairy tales from bloggers interpreted by the opposing lawyer) do not create a FACT ISSUE (legal CAUSE) to continue! Of course, JMHO on that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* I finally did get the Motion for Continuance to load&#8230;</p>
<p>pg. 2 “Nearly a year ago, on December 1, 2008, Plaintiff Virgie Arthur designated John Mallery of BKD, LLP as an expert witness regarding computer forensics. Because of delays beyond Plaintiff’s control, Mr. Mallery has yet to receive data from the defendants for analysis, and he therefore would be unable to provide any meaning ful information, as&#8230;”</p>
<p>&gt; WHAT BS! TX had AH, BS computers! WHAT? They just let the info stay w/ Ball? BUSTED!<br />
I bet they NEVER planned on giving any of the data to any expert! The whole thing was a fishing expedition from TX to find any/all info regarding ANS from HKS, his sister and LB. Stall tactics and delays of data they did have to an expert because VA was not their INITIAL CONCERN!!! IMO</p>
<p>CBS Response:<br />
“What the Plaintiff fails to appreciate is that “unreasonable” interpretations of a publication, such as those advanced by Arthur here, do not create a fact issue sufficient to defeat summary judgment and are rejected as a matter of law.”</p>
<p>EXACTLY!!! As a matter of CASE LAW which is what a Judge as to refer to (not fairy tales from bloggers interpreted by the opposing lawyer) do not create a FACT ISSUE (legal CAUSE) to continue! Of course, JMHO on that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60789</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60789</guid>
		<description>Oh hmm, congratulations to your friend! 
A good sized baby! 

My oldest girl was a big baby at birth, she is now 5&#039; 10&quot; - green eyes and about 128 lbs.... A beauty!
Then I am prejudice, but everyone else says so too! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh hmm, congratulations to your friend!<br />
A good sized baby! </p>
<p>My oldest girl was a big baby at birth, she is now 5&#8242; 10&#8243; &#8211; green eyes and about 128 lbs&#8230;. A beauty!<br />
Then I am prejudice, but everyone else says so too! <img src='http://www.rosespeaks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60788</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60788</guid>
		<description>Girl 8#11Oz born at 10.08 Alaskan time on Nov 12th named Glenna Gabriella Strongheart a friend from the bush in Alaska</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Girl 8#11Oz born at 10.08 Alaskan time on Nov 12th named Glenna Gabriella Strongheart a friend from the bush in Alaska</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60787</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60787</guid>
		<description>hmm, that is really nice. Boy or Girl?

[18]  Rose, Thanks... Either my Acrobat is acting up or have you tried to download these?
LOL It said it could not find my Acrobat Handler... Well, hope he is good looking! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, that is really nice. Boy or Girl?</p>
<p>[18]  Rose, Thanks&#8230; Either my Acrobat is acting up or have you tried to download these?<br />
LOL It said it could not find my Acrobat Handler&#8230; Well, hope he is good looking! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60786</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60786</guid>
		<description>November 13, 2009 CBS’ Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Response to CBS’ Motion for Summary Judgment before any evidence is required and asking Court to grant CBS all of the attorney’s fees associated with these filings today. 

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&amp;op=getit&amp;lid=2653</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>November 13, 2009 CBS’ Reply to Virgie Arthur’s Response to CBS’ Motion for Summary Judgment before any evidence is required and asking Court to grant CBS all of the attorney’s fees associated with these filings today. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&#038;op=getit&#038;lid=2653">http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&#038;op=getit&#038;lid=2653</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60785</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60785</guid>
		<description>&quot;McCabe whines that the big bad defendants have not complied with the unlawful orders from Lindsay’s Court..&quot;

Exactly TRUE! *UNLAWFUL ORDERS* based on; &quot;Because I said so!&quot; Hogwash, will NOT FLY in the HIGHER COURTS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;McCabe whines that the big bad defendants have not complied with the unlawful orders from Lindsay’s Court..&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly TRUE! *UNLAWFUL ORDERS* based on; &#8220;Because I said so!&#8221; Hogwash, will NOT FLY in the HIGHER COURTS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60784</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60784</guid>
		<description>November 13, 2009 CBS’ Objection to Evidence presented with Virgie Arthur’s Response to CBS’ Motion for Summary Judgment before any evidence is required and asking Court to grant CBS all of the attorney’s fees associated with these filings today.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&amp;op=getit&amp;lid=2652</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>November 13, 2009 CBS’ Objection to Evidence presented with Virgie Arthur’s Response to CBS’ Motion for Summary Judgment before any evidence is required and asking Court to grant CBS all of the attorney’s fees associated with these filings today.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&#038;op=getit&#038;lid=2652">http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&#038;op=getit&#038;lid=2652</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60783</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60783</guid>
		<description>http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&amp;gi=GGKS This is the lighted candles I wanted to show I just lit one for the birth of a baby bornlate last evening</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&amp;gi=GGKS">http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&amp;gi=GGKS</a> This is the lighted candles I wanted to show I just lit one for the birth of a baby bornlate last evening</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60782</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60782</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much Rose!
Yep, those are it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much Rose!<br />
Yep, those are it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60781</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60781</guid>
		<description>November 11, 2009 Virgie Arthur Notice of Submission for November 23, 2009 in relations to Plaintiff’s filing for a Motion to Continue Evidence deadlines due to three Writ of Mandamus are pending in the First COA, so Arthur’s expert will not have time to look at the evidence before the closing of experts for plaintiff on November 24, 2009

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&amp;op=getit&amp;lid=2651</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>November 11, 2009 Virgie Arthur Notice of Submission for November 23, 2009 in relations to Plaintiff’s filing for a Motion to Continue Evidence deadlines due to three Writ of Mandamus are pending in the First COA, so Arthur’s expert will not have time to look at the evidence before the closing of experts for plaintiff on November 24, 2009</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&#038;op=getit&#038;lid=2651">http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&#038;op=getit&#038;lid=2651</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60780</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60780</guid>
		<description>November 11, 2009 Virgie Arthur filing for a Motion to Continue Evidence deadlines due to three Writ of Mandamus are pending in the First COA, so Arthur’s expert will not have time to look at the evidence before the closing of experts for plaintiff on November 24, 2009

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&amp;op=getit&amp;lid=2650</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>November 11, 2009 Virgie Arthur filing for a Motion to Continue Evidence deadlines due to three Writ of Mandamus are pending in the First COA, so Arthur’s expert will not have time to look at the evidence before the closing of experts for plaintiff on November 24, 2009</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&#038;op=getit&#038;lid=2650">http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&#038;op=getit&#038;lid=2650</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60779</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60779</guid>
		<description>Evening everyone.

*** I am only interested in reading this one filing [HC TX State Court] &gt; (repost below)

The last filings in the TX State Court were for AH... THANKS.
_______________________________________________________
&quot;608. I notice HC has put up the latest nonsense from McCabe:

• Motion for continuance or abatement of case deadlines 11/11/2009

McCabe whines that the big bad defendants have not complied with the unlawful orders from Lindsay’s Court; the big bad defendants have engaged in ‘massive’ spoliation (of materials that VA is not entitled to see anyway); the big bad defendants have 3 writs of mandamus to delay, delay, delay (hello, the 1st COA deems them worthy of adjudication).

It’s time for a new Judge to nip this charade in the bud.  Posted on Nov 13th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evening everyone.</p>
<p>*** I am only interested in reading this one filing [HC TX State Court] &gt; (repost below)</p>
<p>The last filings in the TX State Court were for AH&#8230; THANKS.<br />
_______________________________________________________<br />
&#8220;608. I notice HC has put up the latest nonsense from McCabe:</p>
<p>• Motion for continuance or abatement of case deadlines 11/11/2009</p>
<p>McCabe whines that the big bad defendants have not complied with the unlawful orders from Lindsay’s Court; the big bad defendants have engaged in ‘massive’ spoliation (of materials that VA is not entitled to see anyway); the big bad defendants have 3 writs of mandamus to delay, delay, delay (hello, the 1st COA deems them worthy of adjudication).</p>
<p>It’s time for a new Judge to nip this charade in the bud.  Posted on Nov 13th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy1</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60778</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60778</guid>
		<description>Ken - I&#039;m having the same problem as the others.  Have sent request for password.  I keep a spreadsheet of all sites with login and password information but for whatever reason, it&#039;s not working for me this time.  Thanks in advance for your help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken &#8211; I&#8217;m having the same problem as the others.  Have sent request for password.  I keep a spreadsheet of all sites with login and password information but for whatever reason, it&#8217;s not working for me this time.  Thanks in advance for your help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMA</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60777</link>
		<dc:creator>JMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60777</guid>
		<description>Oops should have added blue background and has all the updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops should have added blue background and has all the updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMA</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60776</link>
		<dc:creator>JMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60776</guid>
		<description>Ken is the main site the &#039;From Legalese to English? That is where I am I looked around hit my profile but nothing happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken is the main site the &#8216;From Legalese to English? That is where I am I looked around hit my profile but nothing happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMA</title>
		<link>http://www.rosespeaks.com/2009/11/13/newest-filings-in-multiple-courts-involving-anna-nicole-smith%e2%80%99s-estate-and-texas-court-filings/#comment-60775</link>
		<dc:creator>JMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/?p=2449#comment-60775</guid>
		<description>crap s/b &#039;some time&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crap s/b &#8217;some time&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
