Rose speaks – Celebrity and High Profile Trials

Access denied. Registered users only. Well, thanks Rose. There are other places to read the docs.

Evening everyone.

*** I am only interested in reading this one filing [HC TX State Court] > (repost below)

The last filings in the TX State Court were for AH… THANKS.
_______________________________________________________
“608. I notice HC has put up the latest nonsense from McCabe:

• Motion for continuance or abatement of case deadlines 11/11/2009

McCabe whines that the big bad defendants have not complied with the unlawful orders from Lindsay’s Court; the big bad defendants have engaged in ‘massive’ spoliation (of materials that VA is not entitled to see anyway); the big bad defendants have 3 writs of mandamus to delay, delay, delay (hello, the 1st COA deems them worthy of adjudication).

It’s time for a new Judge to nip this charade in the bud. Posted on Nov 13th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean”

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=GGKS This is the lighted candles I wanted to show I just lit one for the birth of a baby bornlate last evening

“McCabe whines that the big bad defendants have not complied with the unlawful orders from Lindsay’s Court..”

Exactly TRUE! *UNLAWFUL ORDERS* based on; “Because I said so!” Hogwash, will NOT FLY in the HIGHER COURTS!!!

hmm, that is really nice. Boy or Girl?

[18] Rose, Thanks… Either my Acrobat is acting up or have you tried to download these?
LOL It said it could not find my Acrobat Handler… Well, hope he is good looking! ;)

Oh hmm, congratulations to your friend!
A good sized baby!

My oldest girl was a big baby at birth, she is now 5′ 10″ – green eyes and about 128 lbs…. A beauty!
Then I am prejudice, but everyone else says so too!

correction of 24.

“..delays of data they did have to an expert ..”
DELAYS OF DATA THEY DID NOT GIVE TO AN EXPERT; because…

Sorry.

Sammy,
Yes I did. I think by amending the original petition, over and over; looking for loop-holes to add CBS, ect.. That the Plaintiff’s counsel themselves cannot keep all of the ‘BS’ straight! ;) An honest true observation.
TX seems to be trying to add the big Defendants like TMZ, CBS according to the STRETCHED, TWISTED STATEMENTS made by Havana and QV…
* Those false scenarios that the two bloggers put out there in hopes of getting rid of this site (my opinion) do not by law (legal statutes) apply to the actions of TMZ and CBS. Plaintiff cannot just lump all accusations to everyone. That is what I got out of it anyway.

I swear! Those sworn statements of those bloggers MEAN NOTHING! They are not legal depositions where both sides are present. They honestly do not hold any weight, ESPECIALLY the ‘weight’ of keeping this frivolous case going. I mean just because these bloggers said this doesn’t make it so, nor does any laws on the books say that everyone has to turn over their computer hard drives because of the accusations of conspiracy by two nutcases.

** LINDSAY had no legal authority by LAW to ORDER what she did!
> This is why it is in the Higher Courts.

Most likely the new TX State Judge will grant the continuance, as what else can he do?
I hope the 1st COA >> REVERSES all of TL’s ridiculous orders than the case will be tossed!

still strange to me to see or read that they make HS like a doctor for Anna’s drugs use and they only talk about HS I am talking about some sites equal him with MJ ’s doctor

I just saw my post #36, WTH? It did read… “I for one think that this has been a really bad year and I can’t wait for it to be over”.

I just don’t understand why my posts and or name are wacky only on this site, I am logged in, I hope this is not a hint that I am not taking, I spell check, WTH?

It is frustrating because honest this is the only site that I care about and I am not computer smart and I don’t know why this seems to always be happening to me. I will mail tomorrow, Thanks

I am not sure heath, Thanks, tomorrow I am going to get to the bottom of it and have my security and etc see what the heck the problem is, a virus check runs every-night, I just don’t know. Thanks again, I love you guys and hate this stupid drama. Sorry.

CBS RESPONSE:
Footnote Pg. 7:

“CBS has objected to Exhibit E of Arthur’s Response on the ground that it is not properly authenticated and the records referred to are not attached as required.
CBS has objected to Exhibit H of Arthur’s Response on the ground that it is conclusory, fails to authenticate the attached DVD’s, and fails to satisfy best evidence requirements. CBS’s Objections to Evidence Submitted with Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for Final Summary Judgment have been filed contemporaneously herewith and are incorporated herein by reference.”

http://definitions.uslegal.com/b/best-evidence/
“Best evidence refers to a rule of evidence that requires an original of a writing, recording, or photograph in order to prove its content.”

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/evidence
“Any matter of fact that a party to a lawsuit offers to prove or disprove an issue in the case. A system of rules and standards that is used to determine which facts may be admitted, and to what extent a judge or jury may consider those facts, as proof of a particular issue in a lawsuit.”

“Hearsay” *(Witch does apply to the blogger’s sworn statements – IMO)*
“The credibility of any witness’s testimony depends upon three factors:
(1) whether the witness accurately perceived what he or she described;
(2) whether the witness retained an accurate memory of that perception; and
(3) whether the witness’s narration accurately conveys that perception.

In order to be allowed to testify, the witness generally must take an oath, must be personally present at the trial, and must be subjected to cross-examination.
These conditions promote the factors that lend themselves to the witness’s credibility…”
^^^^
Those stretched, false sworn statements by qv and havana >> WILL NEVER be allowed in Court AND the TX people (firm/lawyers) ALWAYS KNEW THIS!
* Again, it (the case) WAS NEVER about VA!!!
What a disappointment to her 5 supporters….

Repost of of a VERY GOOD Comment!

(LOL on the part of JH as a muse, and the “experts” not saying what the DA wants them to say! (sound familiar?) > HKS & the Doctors…)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“615. A new story on TMZ is telling:

http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/14/michael-jackson-dr-conrad-murray-propofo-death-investigation-manslaughter-applied-pharmacy-o-j-simpson/

Excerpts:

“But the source added, “There is not a problem with the case. Time is on our side. We want to do this right.” The L.A. County D.A.’s office and the LAPD are working as a unit to “anticipate defense strategies and prepare for them.” The D.A.’s office is actively involved, requesting lots of info from the LAPD.”
…
“Another issue: authorities have gone back to their medical experts for more input, as “strategies have changed” in a case they call “very complicated.””

The DA is delaying in order to anticipate defense strategies? The ‘medical experts’ are not saying what the lawyers want them to say; poor babies; what will they do? It’s déjà vu all over again.

If only the DA could find ‘someone’ to ‘coordinate’ witnesses and evidence for them. Surely there is some as yet unknown but omnipotent Svengali type who is ‘responsible’ and ‘conspired’ to drug MJ against his wishes. Has the DA spoken with JB’s muse, JH, yet? She might be a secret godmother to at least one of MJ’s kids. In such a large family there must be at least one estranged relative from far back in the day who miraculously has the inside scope. Maybe the DA can find someone who picked up a prescription somewhere sometime; ‘someone’ must have opened a bottle and ‘administered’ its content. With millions of photographs taken over the decades surely someone could put together a collection of pictures with MJ’s eyes half-opened or a strange look on his face; that should make the DA’s case right there. Posted on Nov 14th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean”

Beth #48, God Bless you!, I just lose my mind because I have spent so much money on this machine, I have a love hate relationship with my computer, when I was using Internet explorer 7 I was having so many problems so I switched to a new browser and Hibeeb (Bob) from Dell whom I can’t understand, (no offense Bob) told me to not allow auto updates and I thought things would just be the same but I am told now that is not the case, I just had my computer set back to manufacture specs, I think that was in May, the problem with me is because I am not computer smart I envision cost and bs and that just makes me want to pull my hair out , I will start working on my computer problems come Monday, I tried today but kids and distractions, I will get this resolved, Thank you all for any advise. Thanks again Beth for the link.

Ken, thank you, I did not mean to imply anything about here, sorry if it read that way. I know you and Rose don’t hint, You both are straight up and that is another thing I totally respect you both for.

Rose I hope you are feeling better and Ken your grandmother is in my prayers.

I hope everyone is well!. Beth, Sammy, Heath, Rox and anyone else that wants to join I hope to make it to chat tomorrow. ~~ Rosespeaks Rocks~~