Ford Shelley and Ben Thompson

Here are the newest papers filed yesterday and today in the federal court for South Carolina adding Gaither Thompson II, Gina and Melodie as family members of Ford Shelley and G. Ben Thompson as defendants replacing the Doe defendants previously listed.

The Estate for Anna Nicole Smith also is adding Susan Brown, one of the family’s attorneys for dissemination of stolen property and not obeying previous court orders. Wonder if there is a State Bar complaint on her in Georgia for what appears could be criminal acts?

I will have an article up later after I have time to read all of the papers.

October 13, 2009 The Fifth Amended Order setting new deadlines for filing Motions, Responses, etc. and setting a new jury trial date.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2602.

October 27, 2009 The Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filing a Motion for Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2603.

October 27, 2009 Exhibit A the Subpoena Duces Tecum issued to Susan Brown in lawsuit of The Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filing a Motion for Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2604.

October 27, 2009 Exhibit B letter from Luke Lantta to Susan Brown stating that the deposition of Susan Brown would go forward on June 24 and asking if she had received back all of the computer data and other documents she had sent to the O’Quinn Law Firm in lawsuit of The Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filing a Motion for Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2605.

October 27, 2009 The Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filing a Brief to Support the Motion for Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2606.

October 27, 2009 Exhibit A Brown’s Memorandum of Law to Support Motion to Quash the Subpoena Duces Tecum in The Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filing a Brief to Support the Motion for Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2607.

October 27, 2009 Exhibit B Excerpts in the Gaither B. Thompson II Deposition The Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filing a Brief to Support the Motion for Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2608.

October 27, 2009 Exhibit C, E, F Excerpts in the in Gina Shelley and two different excerpts on Ford Shelley’s Deposition The Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filing a Brief to Support the Motion for Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2609.

October 27, 2009 Exhibit D Excerpts from Susan Brown’s Deposition The Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filing a Brief to Support the Motion for Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2610.

October 28, 2009 Proposed First Amended Complaint to be filed when the Court gives Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2611.

October 28, 2009 Exhibit C the Restraining Order issued against G. Ben Thompson in the Bahamas filed with the Proposed First Amended Complaint to be filed when the Court gives Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2612.

October 28, 2009 Exhibit F letter from Susan Brown dated September 25, 2009 to Neil McCabe stating that Ben Thompson no longer wanted to be part of the Joint Defense Agreement filed and asking for the hard drives and all other material to be return to her filed with the Proposed First Amended Complaint to be filed when the Court gives Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2613.

October 28, 2009 Exhibit H emails between Larry Birkhead and Ford Shelley about the Estate’s property filed with the Proposed First Amended Complaint to be filed when the Court gives Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2614.

October 28, 2009 Emails between Luke Lantta and Susan McDonald where she consented on behalf of her clients for The Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filing a Motion for Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.

http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2615.

You can pick up any of the papers of cases we are following in our download section opened to All not just members of Rose Speaks.com.

©Rose Turner
October 28, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

52 Responses to “Anna Nicole Smith’s Estate adds G. Ben Thompson’s Lawyer Susan Brown to S. C. Lawsuit”
  1. trina says:

    I have read the SC amended complaint. My hope and my prayer is that the court adds the newly named defendants and then…. one of them…. names the O’Q lawfirm as a third party. And whoever else was soliciting the property that rightfully belonged to ANS and her estate. The things that have been released to the media as a result of FShelly can never be taken back, but each and everyone of them should have to pay for their part. What they did was criminal.

  2. Sammy1 says:

    In reading the latest docs from SC is like “OMG”.
    Brown knows she’s in deep sh*t.
    These people are unbelievable!!!!!!!

  3. heath says:

    oh now this is getting real good..
    311. “If you go back and read his Consent Agreement it not only refers (in the first paragraph) to the oral agreement of March 3, 2007, but goes on to talk about suing Howard and the Estate”

    I forgot to explain–he was hoping to represent FS and Gaither (‘whereas they are contemplating legal action)see P.2. That was May 15, 2008 (when Clark picked up the drives) he signed that Consent Agreement. His email was June. HKS sued in August.

    Posted at 11:54PM on Oct 27th 2009 by Howard Supporter

    Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/21#comments#ixzz0VDQEuEJi

  4. Beth says:

    Hello heath!
    Yes, I saw that post! REVEALING isn’t it? ;)
    Many good observations by those two over there on these latest docs…

    Morning everyone,
    Well, I had a chance to go on late last evening… WTH is going on in that sandpit? Holy Cow! First there is only mention of the new filings by 2 VAS, then the one that was posting trash directly to the 3 yr. old (DL) ps>stating her WHOLE unique name to boot! Starts in on someone’s children… then they defend themselves and it goes on forever! NO talk of the case – just insults to someone’s family to DEFLECT I guess… SICKENING!
    To top it off, the vas pick on a person THEN turn around and blame that poster for sticking up for themselves and their family, like it was ALL the victim’s fault!
    And others join in on the insanity and gang up on a HKS supporter. CRAZY!

    Then the one that used to come on here a few times (wulfie) responds to a comment; “Woody filed today adding Susan Brown and her firm as defendants in the SC suit but no Texas Cabal. lol” by answering;
    “lolol….I’ll bet Nelda and crew are expelling gold bricks at that one.”

    ** Since I am one of the ‘crew’ I would like to express my opinion and thoughts… *> OF COURSE BELOW IS: JMO on how it looks to me…

    - The vas state repeatedly that no charges have been filed on theft of Horizons. (like NO WRONG was ever done??) What if that happened to them?
    > many of us have stated forever that they have NOT been exposed in a case in a Court of law YET!

    - “gold bricks” HA! I think NOT!
    > I bet that the defendants will either ‘out’ the TX cabal in the trial transcript enough for a copy to be sent to the Judicial Bar of Ethics for lawyers, you know the agency that determines if you have MISUSED your profession as an Officer of the Court… then >> DISBARRMENT!
    > Or, as LW suggested in the transcripts, TX cabal can be brought in by S. Brown or any/all of the Defendants as THIRD PARTY defendants… so they can SHARE in the RESTITUTION of any profit made from the use of STOLEN PROPERTY, and can SHARE in the CRIMINAL MALICIOUS (intent to DO HARM to others) DISTRIBUTION of STOLEN PROPERTY!

    The vas need to ask themselves,WHEN McC and GANG couldn’t get FS/GBT to ‘bite’ at suing HKS…. The cabal then dreamed up this so called conspiracy to defame VA. ABSURD! TX NEEDED to get HKS, LB into some KIND OF LEGAL SUIT to TRY and subpoena their personal docs in order to have some type of HOLD on them to have LEVERAGE to ‘deal’ with them on the potential Marshall Estate! (my theory from reading their actions)
    WHO ended up suffering for this COCKED UP FALSE STORY of conspiracy re: VA?
    Well two innocent bloggers ended up in jail, many defendants have paid thousands of dollars for FALSE CIVIL ALLEGATIONS…
    All the time it was done (the case in TX) for a couple of reasons, NOTHING TO DO WITH THEIR CLIENT!
    - Leverage to make HKS, LB BEND to their will
    - PREMEDITATED ACTION of filing a false case(s) against HKS, LB, in order to DEFLECT their (TX cabal) actions of their OWN CONSPIRACY to take down HKS.

    e.g. Trying to get FS, then later GBT to sue HKS AND Anna’s Estate for God knows what… AGAIN, pressure to BEND to THEIR WILL!
    e.g. TX then settling on their MADE UP case of a defamation against VA, when there were NO PUBLISHED DEFAMATION with intent to harm by anyone!
    Hell! TMZ does the same to public figures everyday, TX FEDERAL COURT found VA to be a limited public figure due to her SOLICITING $ from the media…

    So I repeat; I think NOT regarding expelling the gold bricks….

    We always have said here… WAIT until the real TRUTH, the ORIGINS of actions from the start comes out of the SC/GA case (s)…
    It (SC case) was ‘down-played’ as not a big deal by the vas, hogwash!
    CRIMINAL CHARGES will come out of these cases, they have permanently damaged ANS’s Estate by their actions.
    FS and crew MADE MONEY STEALING FROM A WOMAN WHO PASSED AWAY HOURS BEFORE!

    Then they had the gall to take them to their ‘people’ to do forensics searches on STOLEN COMPUTER HARD DRIVES!
    AND! Actually ADMIT that crap in emails NOW, NOW, >>>> SUBMITTED to a Court of Law! ** PERMANENTLY ON RECORD! **
    How F-ing Embarrassing is that for ANY human being ESPECIALLY lawyers and a former federal agent!

    LOL I HONESTLY do NOT think a ‘oral agreement’ or later a signed consent to ’share’ STOLEN PROPERTY will ‘FLY’ in ANY COURT!
    * NOT EVEN IN TEXAS!!! imho of course! :)

    (sorry for the CAPS, I was ‘yelling’ my frustrations of the true conspiracies of that group!) *SHAME ON THEM ALL!
    LOOK at the lives they have ruined! NEVER-EVER was it about their client… or DL… GREED, only GREED it seems. OF COURSE REVENGE for being sued for defamation themselves in FL – added to this PREMEDITATED MALICIOUS CONSPIRACY TO HARM OTHER INDIVIDUALS… so it seems, so it is. IMO

    Edited at the posters request by Rose

  5. heath says:

    And finally some truth about the clown video is coming out…
    312. Doc 77 in Case# 4:08-CV-02753-TLW-TER, Filed 10/27/09, U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

    Bombshell Highlights:

    • FS finally admits ANS was not stoned in the ‘Clown Video’ – just acting

    FS in his depo makes it clear that he was aware of how ANS and HKS would make outrageous videos for her website to earn revenue. FS was upset that Riley got involved in one of these videos when Riley was too young to understand it was all for fun.

    • Agent Santiago travelled to SC to procure a copy of the stolen ‘Clown Video’

    After the October, 2007 highly publicized raids on the homes/offices of Drs. K & E, Agent Santiago travelled to see FS/G. Ben and SB to personally take possession of what he knew was a copy of a stolen video. SB claims amnesia as to which of the people in the room actually handed Santiago the stolen video.

    • Cosby aggressively courted FS to vouch for her and her book’s content

    Well, that didn’t work out. Cosby/McNamara actively seeking false testimony is a recurrent theme for them. LOL McNamara in a cheesy way in an email to SB makes it seem like FS approached her yet it was McNamara that was going to write the declarations and have FS and the Thompsons (plus Lori Payne) sign them. McNamara at least was aware that Wood would tear her apart if she showed up with declarations from FS that in any way were not supportive of HKS (i.e. were false).

    • McCabe and Clark took possession of stolen materials for nefarious purposes

    Expressly for the purpose of defaming and framing HKS, McCabe (with Clark as his bagman) sought out what he knew for a fact was stolen EM from ‘Horizons’. Renee Rose has been crying and whining to Judge Perry to introduce these knowingly stolen images (no chain of custody, likely altered) ever since.

    • McCabe actively and separately courted both FS and G. Ben as clients!

    Just as Cosby couldn’t for herself, McCabe couldn’t ‘induce’ anyone to stand up for VA either.

    • CA DOJ and the TX cabal are both in possession of stolen materials

    And both knew that they were stolen at the time they took possession. SB was still in violation of a Federal Court injunction at the time of the depo! She had kept copies of some of the stolen EM on her computer after being forced by the Court to turn over the USB drives she had finally retrieved from McCabe. Wood stopped the depo at one point and demanded SB and her attorney hand over the stolen materials right there right then to him. The O’Q crew and their bloggers are still in violation of that injunction since none have personally returned their copies of the stolen materials.

    Posted at 12:07AM on Oct 28th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean

    Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/21#comments#ixzz0VDQkeDuL

    313. H.S.,

    “Gina and Melanie –I found them to be sickening they way they poured through ANS things her bedroom, –disgusting. Betcha the redacted parts have all the good stuff, like the FRIDGE PHOTO in which the refrigerator happened to be open? Good ole boy Gaither isn’t very bright…yuk…never mentioned an open refrigerator but sure talked about the master bedroom, Anna’s wall sketches they stole, FS with a fistful of docs in his hands and ‘Tracy’ with a fistful in her hands–FS reading the docs.

    All day at Horizons! They spent the whole day stealing and nosying around. Right under the noses of the paparazzi. Brown’s depo was really redacted big time–I take it when she was given five minutes to produce docs she had held back–she returned with nothing. Then redactions.”
    *****
    Baby Ben and the others were so remarkably arrogant in their depos. SB would say “no” first then have the truth dragged out of her repeatedly. SB seemed very afraid to spit out the names of the TX cabal members.

    Anyone thinking the SC crew was in the ‘none-too-bright’ category will not be disabused of that notion after reading their depos.

    The heavily redacted ‘goodies’ may appear in CA if necessary. On the public record already are the highly questionable actions of Santiago. Just a thought …

    Posted at 12:14AM on Oct 28th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean

    Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/21#comments#ixzz0VDRDpVBh

    314. Posted at 12:07AM on Oct 28th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean

  6. BEVERLY says:

    Thank you Rose,You know I can picture Lin Wood asking S B those questions,and .he was not to be fooled with,It appears Don Clark had his dirty hands in this whole mess,and I am still sure Jerry Brown is trying to cover Clark butt.Does anyone every think,because I do all the time,hpw Howard has put his hurt aside and making sure Dannielynn gets every bit that is own to her from her mother,Howa=rd has so much on his plate,yet he is thinking of securing Dannielynn estate.You know what I would love to see,Geraldo in Handcuffs,hauled to couRt for receiving stolen property,and putting it on National TV,

  7. JMA says:

    heath [89] in reference to the following…

    FS finally admits ANS was not stoned in the ‘Clown Video’ – just acting

    OMG we have been saying that for almost 3 year.

  8. JMA says:

    Rose [147] looks like the lasso is being used to rope in some cowboy’s yeeha I have a feeling we may see some familiar names say like from Team Texas.

  9. Bewildered says:

    Ironic that Ms. Browns letterhead has the scales of justice as a logo.

  10. Rose says:

    Yea Bewildered it is, funny how lawyers are scrambling I bet to save their license???

  11. Bewildered says:

    That would be my guess also Rose. And now it seems more apparant why a certain person is filing bankruptcy who may have hosted some of those pics and files on her website.

    How far and wide past the O’Q lawfirm did those files and photos go? Some have already admitted they have copies. Do they just wipe their hard drive? Did Geraldo/Fox only get a copy of the clown video or did they get assorted items also? Wilma proclaimed over and over..wait and SEE….was she the one who passed to bloggers? Cosby and lawyers poured over the info also…wasn’t that used to make her defense? With the new? info that Cosby was involved from the beginning, can the judge amend the requisits for what heads to trail?

    Who was on the plane as they were pouring over the pics? So many more questions…think I’ll have to read Art’s site again…

  12. JMA says:

    Rose ~~ crap you closed the other thread right before I hit the submit button :-(

    From previous, thread…

    Ken [159] why does everyone but me :-( gets special accommodation whenever their posts are hung up somewhere? Yes, I’m referring to this tidbit “you were just in the ‘waiting’ pool. They serve cocktails there.” hmm, now I’m feeling like the red headed stepchild here and yes, I’m throwing a hissy fit.

    OK that looks like a lot of reading to do so I think I will hold off until tomorrow, night all.

  13. JMA says:

    Oops went twice cause I tried to fix a spelling error please eliminate #1

  14. hmm says:

    Thanks everyone for reading and explaining some of the down loads,for some reason I can’t open any of the files and don’t know why.i read all the cosby ones just fine!!!

  15. hmm says:

    JMA yes we have been saying Anna was not out of it for the clown video,wonder how the vas people see that one now and GVS along with NG and geraldo all should have know to investigate before putting that garbage out, I guess ratings are more important than real news.Greta claim ot be real news LOL good one
    What I am wondering is can any of these say Pro SE defendants get repaid from the law firm that dragged them into a frivolous lawsuit??

  16. hmm says:

    What I mean is if this case is dismissed or lost can a judge rule that VA has to pay all the cost of the Pro Se defendants. I sure hope that is the case

  17. Ken says:

    JMA [13] First off, I resemble that remark, twice over. “hmm, now I’m feeling like the red headed stepchild here” :lol: Second, brand new feature I just thought of there. Trying not to advertise it too much, we don’t have our liquor license yet. :wink: Third, that was just the first response that came to mind when I replied back. Wasn’t person specific.

  18. raven says:

    Rose thanks for the documents. How refreshing to read these, after waiting such a long time for it to happen. LW is still my hero, along with Judge Chin. :)

  19. Beth says:

    hmm,
    “Thanks everyone for reading and explaining some of the down loads,for some reason I can’t open any of the files and don’t know why.i read all the cosby ones just fine!!!”

    * Have you tried downloading the Adobe Reader (newest download) it is free, and it should pull up the downloads for you. [dial-up or high speed]
    http://www.adobe.com/downloads/

    If that doesn’t work just copy the Description of the doc and the link:
    ‘ October 28, 2009 Emails between Luke Lantta and Susan McDonald where she consented on behalf of her clients for The Estate of Anna Nicole Smith filing a Motion for Leave (permission) to add additional defendants to the existing lawsuit against G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley.
    http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2615

    Email to Rose and I bet she can email the document back in an attachment reply email.

    From [16]
    “.. if this case is dismissed or lost can a judge rule that VA has to pay all the cost of the Pro Se defendants?”

    It TAKES money to file another case to request getting paid for false allegations, time, and suffering.
    IF a Judge finds the plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel to be egregiously pursuing them with NO BASIS or UNPROVED HARM of VA…

    YES, IF they have stated (the ones w/ lawyers always asks for costs) in their filings (towards the end) to be awarded costs then if
    clear proof can be shown that the plaintiff KNEW all along there was no merit to the false allegations… Judges have been known to
    have the other side pay their costs. Mostly, I believe you have to file a seperate civil suit if it is not clearly shown that you have been
    suckered into a baseless case due to the malice of the person(s) filing the suit against you. LOL Not very clear now that I read that back.
    Am tired tonight.
    BB tomorrow.

  20. pixiesmom50 says:

    can this document show the preliminary hearing that the DA was involve to make HS looks guilty or not.

  21. Rose says:

    Ok I have read the papers… OMG so FS knew ANS was playing a child in that video, everything that family did was to just get the house in the Bahamas back? They were willing to destroy lives to just get “even” after ANS died??

  22. heath says:

    Good points from Swims…

    328. HKS Prelim Day 11 – Another ‘expert’ bites the dust 10-28-2009

    • Add another prosecution ‘professional’ who ends up looking foolish and misleading

    • Renee tries for tabloid headlines again – struck down – told to move along

    Dr. Gagne on Tuesday (Day 10): Dr. K ‘trying to keep a lid’ on ANS’s psychiatric problem with methadone; Dr. Gagne on Wednesday (Day 11): Oops, “I was misled”, methadone is not a big deal in this story, but, but, but … Dr. K ‘overprescribed’. Too late, no one believes you anymore.

    Slice-gate, then Dr. Maullin who never diagnosed or discussed ‘addiction’ and now Dr. Gagne who has been telling a story not supported by any other witness nor the medical records – what the hell is going on here?

    As AP’s Linda Deutsch relates from today; ““She was an expert at manipulating physicians into giving her the drugs she craved,” Gagne said.” So this supports criminal charges against whom for what?

    As was the case since March 12, 2009, when JB pranced/stumbled forth to proclaim his greatness and offer up preposterous charges against HKS/K/E, the prosecution needed top-flight unimpeachable experts and leaders in their fields to testify to the elements of the alleged crimes. Instead, confused and misleading ‘experts’ have been brought forth. Eye witnesses FOR the prosecution have struck done all the elements of the crimes charged.

    JB/Renee Rose read their shtick, which was never funny only false, from VA’s lawsuits’ allegations. Crap in Houston is still crap in Los Angeles.

    • What this should be is a disciplinary proceeding with the Medical Board and the two Doctors.

    So Jon Genens the Board’s investigator tells the tale of two sets of medical records kept by Dr. K; identical except for the ‘official’ set kept at Dr. K’s lawyer’s office. The ‘official’ set removed the ‘notes to ones self’ entries (that all Doctors make on their records) regarding possible benzo and methadone dependence; a very minor thing. As Judge Perry opined this may represent a consciousness of guilt. A regrettable move for Dr. K to be sure, since lawyers zero in on these tiny details to the exclusion of all else (and common sense). A letter of reprimand from the Board maybe; when hunted by government authorities on tabloid charges DO NOT change even a comma on your records.

    • Desperate Renee Rose tries to introduce Daniel Smith’s accidental death to the proceedings

    The prosecution is not even trying anymore to look and sound legitimate. Whatever charges might survive this tabloid dog and pony show prelim will never survive appeal.

    Posted at 7:27PM on Oct 28th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean

    Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/22#comments#ixzz0VIrxkprG

  23. heath says:

    and this about the clown video…

    329. Just for fun – FS’s take on the ‘Clown Video’

    Beginning at Line 13 of page 140 of FS’s 6-2-09 depo, Volume One, which is on PACER Doc# 77-2 of the SC case #4:08-CV-02753, Exhibit E and on page 45 of 49; these are FS’s words.

    13 Anna sold videos. Howard sold – and did
    14 these videos because he found out he could make money
    15 from it; okay? I was mad because he videotaped my
    16 daughter and was doing it. Anna being f*ucked up on
    17 video is not something that he deliberately went and
    18 drugged her to do this. I said earlier, I believe she
    19 had a reaction to it. He was videotaping it. Yeah,
    20 he said it was going to be worth a lot of money, but
    21 he knew there was no harm, no foul; okay? But my
    22 daughter was too young to not know what was going on.
    23 I’m mad about that.
    24 But as far as to show him in a bad light,
    25 the media, they can turn whatever they want to. I
    (page 141 of depo – page 46 of 49 on PACER doc 77-2)
    1 didn’t mean it to happen that way.
    (Original question stems from page 93 of depo, page 44 of 49 of Doc 77-2)
    22 Q. Have you heard Howard discuss the clown
    23 video and discuss the fact that Anna was, in effect,
    24 playing a child character?
    25 A. I did. I remember – I remember that.
    (followed by several pages of redactions)

    Easiest to ‘read’ if you imagine a SC accent.

    Posted at 7:29PM on Oct 28th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean

    Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/22#comments#ixzz0VIsSqamJ

  24. heath says:

    and this…I got to get my cuppa and read. Need to download though..
    344. 4:08-cv-02753 (SC case) Filed 10/28/09 Entry Number 78-1 Page 103 of 155

    Exhibit F is SB’s letter of 9-25-09 to McCabe telling him that G. Ben wished to withdraw from the ‘Common Interest’ agreement (the one written and signed only by McCabe; McCabe added SB’s signature with a notation ‘by permission’) and asking McCabe to obey the law and return all of the copies of the stolen materials from ‘Horizons’ that he possesses and to confirm that McCabe didn’t disseminate any of the materials to others.

    Note to SB – his own bloggers confirm that McCabe was a busy bee distributing stolem EM to others.

    Posted at 9:49PM on Oct 28th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean

    Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/16/larry-birkhead-anna-nicole-smith-howard-k-stern-drugs-sandeep-kapoor-khristine-eroshevich/23#comments#ixzz0VItwsgvV

  25. Lucky says:

    I am enjoying this part. The SC clan has always seemed very sneaky and lying to me, always. They were too obvious and wanting to be on TV and bark foul to all others but themselves. Now after they destroyed a mans reputation, dragged him thru hell and back, now they want to fess up? Sue the crap out of them and dont take offers Team Truth Howard. Why were two women trashing thru Anna puter? None of their frigging biz. And sunglasses are not for safe keeping, good grief. So now, he was not really mad at Howard, he was just mad because his daughter did not understand the play acting that was done to make money. O K A Y SC clan.

    I wonder if Wood will be asking if any of those nuts blogged? If their family blogged? I think its a very good possibility. Get it? Area known as the Carolinas? And…I doubt, but I hope we see a new bloggers case soon. All those in receipt of said stolen materials and who posted them. Every dang one of them.

    I was disappointed in Wood not asking about Vice blogging. I always thought that would have come out and put an end to all those rumors. Maybe one day it will.

    Beth…………..I have noticed a pattern over time, as Im sure you have as well. Every time, not sometimes, every time I bring up the SC clan at the dark dungeon, they attack me, my kids, and all my family repeatedly without holding back one ounce of vile. I mean they do it always with me anyway, but more severe when the SC clan is mentioned in a negative way. Odd, very odd. Something has always been odd about Topix and SC clan. Not sure what it is, but Im sure it will come out at some point. There are certain bloggers who can write anything and never get banned. They can stalk, post names, addresses, The most vile and vulgar posts ever, and all about your family and not so much as a hand spank. Rose, TS, Lyndal, and many know this as fact. That part is a known fact. Even known, I will never give up, till this story ends. Made it my volunteer mission to see justice for all bloggers and Howard with his family. And poor little Dannielynn and Larry too being trashed so badly. Nuff said there. LOL. There are some very inteteresting links I found and have been reading about that place. No wonder they are complained about so much. There are several threads regarding this subject.

    Rose……………In the game a while back with the video with them at the Horizons when we were all guessing who was there, was it ever said or told who was there? It went on for many articles but I dont remember it ever being said. I was in and out of town, so I might have missed it. So was it that clan that was there as I hinted to and we all thought? I just dont remember the end of that. LOL

    And…why would TS think you would be smoozing with einy and Kerry in the first place? What evidence does she have? That is not making any sense at all. So Im sure there is more I dont know about for her to make such a claim.

    Also, all these folks losing stuff on their puters around this story…………..hmmmm………..and all these puter experts. Make me think!

    Nite all. I hope SC clan gets all coming to them, as they dished out to Howard and his life. If Howard is found guilty of something by a court, them so be it. But dont go making crap up for the sake of having him found guilty, when innocent. Lady justice does not work this way.

  26. BEVERLY says:

    Good Morning Everyone—Boy do I agree with Swims statement”What this should be is a disciplinary proceeding with the Medical Board and the two Doctors”to me that hit the nail on the head.Howard should not be prosecuted for any crime,this was all done by the Doctors order and Howard thought because it was always done that way ,that is what should be done,NO MALICE WHATSOEVER, or any other intention. I also think there should be something done to Don Clark,who has put to SHAME his former title FBI agent,he has disgraced himself and but the Bureau in a bad light.Jery Brown to me if I can remember right has been a flower child from way back,maybe he can find a street corner,and smoke all the weed he wants,and say it for medical reasons.And thanks to Vergie Arthur,all her daughters private medical problems and all Anna’s problems was put out there for the public to read,and tear apart her daughter, BUT what Vergie did not count on was what most of the world thinks of her,(GREEDY GRANDMA),Howard wanted to and still does build up Anna to the public,and her own mother found every way possible to tear down her own daughter,and as from day one think of HERSELF and HER WANTS.

  27. pixiesmom50 says:

    So people take medication without thinking because the doctor order it that why some people OD like sleeping medication or even vitamin .

  28. pixiesmom50 says:

    I hope if JB or Santiago was aware of all the trash with the OQ and MacCeab and they still went on about all the charges to make a name for the election they should go to jail just like the one in the Duke case the DA went to jail .

  29. susieq2 says:

    I was suprised how well Ben T answered questions in depo. I think he may have been deposed before. lol
    Rose do those blank pages mean they were redacted ? Thanks.

  30. susieq2 says:

    oops, and can that be by either side?

  31. Beth says:

    “..this should be is a disciplinary proceeding with the Medical Board and the two Doctors”

    * Beverly, ISN’T THAT THE TRUTH! ^^^^^^
    ~~~~
    The ONLY conspiracy is the one that TX (with SC’s help) CONCOCTED to SET UP HKS!
    ~~~~
    * Sammy, still waiting for Harvey’s surprise! ;)
    ~~~~
    * pixiesmom, there are many ACCIDENTAL OVERDOSES each year from prescriptions medicines.
    There are many reasons, body tolerance, not taking the medicine correctly, and the INTERACTION of more than one medicine at the same time.

    “Prescription Drugs Play Increasing Role in Overdoses”

    http://www.healthystates.csg.org/NR/rdonlyres/3F157E26-8562-4F09-BD45-DFC39D17A918/0/AccidentalOverdoseSNFEB092.pdf

    “As recent tragedies shine the spotlight on accidental drug
    overdoses, it’s becoming increasingly clear that prescription
    drugs are playing an increasing role in accidental deaths.
    States are doing something about it.”

    “Drug overdose deaths are on the rise in
    the United States, but it’s not what you
    might think.

    They are accidents.

    Many states are reconsidering policies
    to combat prescription drug overdoses in
    light of new statistics and recent tragedies.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Well its gonna be a busy day, it is too cold here this morning!
    BRRrrr!
    Have a nice day everyone.

  32. Beth says:

    Forgot this…

    * heath, [22] from Swims…

    “The prosecution is not even trying anymore to look and sound legitimate.
    Whatever charges might survive this tabloid dog and pony show prelim will never survive appeal.”

    “Posted at 7:27PM on Oct 28th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean”

    EXACTLY CORRECT!

    BUT! Can you imagine the time and costs?

    *** THIS IS WHAT TX has strived for!!! They just wanted to do DAMAGE!
    The outcome, most likely will get some ‘railroaded charges’ that stick.
    Maybe a reprieve after two more years of fighting… Just Sickening!

    TX most likely does not care about the result of their actions…
    JUST that the ‘actions’ are making it difficult for these people!
    REVENGE; PLAIN AND SIMPLE!
    THEY LOST, SO THEY WANT TO MAKE YOU PAY!
    They have enough money, they do not care who, what lawyer you pay,
    it seems to me… they just want YOU TO SUFFER! JMHO on those creeps!

  33. Bewildered says:

    Well that was some interesting reading going thru those docs and takes away the speculation. That ‘agency to agency’ transfer bit was broken at the beginning. Gina having the hard drives copied in SC. Did her ‘computer guru’ make more copies for himself? Or just skim thru what he wanted? Did BDK do the same?

    At times, I remember a comment or a img being presented and the response would be…”where did you get that”? Now it’s pretty obvious. Wonder what img’s or files were deleted? Something that would incriminate the SC folk or did they delete words/sentences/emails? That can be recovered can’t it?

    I guess I’m not the only one that can be vindictive at times. Not a great trait, I know. Much worse if you have to make it up as you go along or ‘fabricate’ to get to your end goal.

  34. Bewildered says:

    Beth, I don’t think it was just because the Firm was sued. Not as hard as they’ve been playing. If it was always for the good of the baby, why sue the estate? The estate will be what provides for her for quite some time. And marketing and licensing is a HUGE biz that could bring royalties forever. That would be ’sure’ money compared to the ‘what if’ money of the Marshall suit.

  35. Rose says:

    #25 Lucky YES we know who was in those pictures at what we call “Riley’s birthday party”, they used to rent building space from the Shelley’s *Used to* being operative there. There were swimsuit designers, in that picture was the man and woman, their grown daughter who also designs swimsuits, Gina, and others… would have to go back and count. The woman said FS through a fit because there was 2 of everything and ANS would not let Riley take everything with her, ANS wanted her to leave one set to play with when she came to visit. The woman said that Riley was SPOILED rotten by FS and that alone would have caused him to lash out. This couple with their grown daughter were the ones at dinner with Ford and Gina and her Gina called Horizons many times during dinner and never was concerned she was having fun and wanted to stay. They were also with FS and Gina when they picked up Riley and ANS was JUST FINE…. yea we debunked that in Nov. 2007.

  36. Rose says:

    Folks Roxanne had a tragic death of a friend she had grown up with last night. This friend was going through a divorce and having a hard time of it… Roxanne had known this friend since they were kids, she loved them greatly, had been concerned, she is devastated and I would not expect her back online any time soon…

    Ken and I are keeping in close contact with Roxanne and will let you know how she is doing…

  37. BEVERLY says:

    BETH—–I have a feeling Dr E and Anna had a arrangement,she gave Anna the means,what Anna did was up to her,That is the only explanation I can come up with for using CH.It just nags at me,The people that tryed to tear down Howard,destroy him in turn destroyed themselfs.I am wondering if that is the big secret harvey is keeping.

  38. susieq2 says:

    Gee, I had not scrolled up… Roxanne, I am so sorry. A childhood friend is priceless.

    I have lost my joy.

  39. JMA says:

    Afternoon All…

    hmm [15] yes we have and the same goes for when she gave that interview to ET. She was not under the influence of anything when she gave that interview, nope she was pissed off at her ignorant estrange mother.

  40. JMA says:

    Ken [17] so does that mean when my post get hung up I will be able to enjoy a nice refreshing drink too well I mean once you all hear from the liquor board that is. Oh and yes I am over twenty-one [a tad :lol: ] so there will be no issue’s with serving a minor ;-)

  41. JMA says:

    Rose [21] IMO that is downright dirty but then again who has been fighting a clean fight since the death of Anna, oh wait actually right after the death of Daniel is when the mud started slinging.

  42. Ken says:

    JMA [40] Yes, you will be able to……but if you don’t want to wait (and keep mum on some stuff) we got a nice stash of home brew (fresh each day from a local still (we even have various flavors) :lol:

    :edited by me to keep from cornfuzzling others:

  43. Roxanne says:

    Thank you for the thoughts ladies. I am sitting here trying to gain enough control to get in my car and drive out to his house to be with my second family right now. I need to be with them right now but I’m also afraid in a way to go. I don’t know if I can walk into a house that my best friend died in yesterday. I know that I am strong but I don’t know if I am that strong. I don’t know if I will be back on the web for a while or not. I tend to go over to his facebook and read messages people are leaving for him and it tears me apart all over again. If I don’t talk with you for a while you will know why.

    Bev
    Give em hell girl.
    JMA
    Don’t let em get away with anything
    Susieq
    I just don’t know what to say…..lol :)

  44. Lucky says:

    Rose…………………..Thanks. I missed the ending to that story. Explains a lot.

  45. Beth says:

    Bewildered,
    [34] Excellent point!

    ROXANNE > MY HEART IS JUST BREAKING FOR YOU DEAR!
    You have my email, if you need to talk let me know anytime day or night.

  46. BEVERLY says:

    DID John OQ state that he was raised by his grandmother? The article I just read said he was raised by his father.Was he lying to garnish sympathy for Vergie.?

  47. BEVERLY says:

    ALSO just read the nannies said,there’s one problem where are the nannies,and why can’t they speak for themself If you can not be in court to speak for yourself your a LIAR JUST AS JACKE HATTEN LIAR and anything comming out of the nannies mouth I WOULD NEVER BELIEVE,They are for sale to the highest bidder

  48. heath says:

    #48 Beverly thats what I meant about a comment I made about the poison guy Thompson ? why are they are allowed to put statements in this that are not first hand or able to be challenged…you could say anything and not have to prove it…

  49. heath says:

    also weren’t they paid to say stuff for ford shelley….

  50. heath says:

    oh and rita tried to pay them :)

  51. BEVERLY says:

    Good Morning Everyone—-Today,I can be honest,I cannot began to count the people that were hurt on OQ money.He may be Texas Idea of a good Attorney not mine.Different strokes for different folks.In this world money rules,in God’s world it does not.I will be the first to say Howard is just a human being,and made some mistakes like all of us,but the evil he has been put through no man deserves.I do not believe OQ gave to charities for any other reason then a Tax deduction,and self-importance.My heart is with every one OQ has harmed with all his money,and I do hope,the OQ lAW fIRM CLOSES DOWN ,and McCabe and Don Clark and WV ARE OUT OF A JOB.and Vergie can go back to being what she is a greedy low life.

  52.  
Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith