Is Slice Diced? Drugs Money and Sex – Day Six of the Anna Nicole Smith Preliminary Hearing.
Posted by Rose in Adam Braun, All Things Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith's Will, Anna Nicole's Nannies, CBS-ET, Celebrity Trials, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Debunking the myths on ALL cases related to Anna Nicole, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Dr. Kapoor, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Entertainment Tonight, Ford Shelley, G Ben Thompson, Geraldo - Live, Geraldo At Large, Geraldo FOX News, Harvey Levin, High Proflie Trials, Howard K Stern, J. Christopher Smith, J. Christopher Smith Esq, Jack Harding, Jackie Hatten, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P.I, John Nazarian PI, Larry Birkhead, Mark Speer, Nazarian P. I., Neil McCabe, Pol' Atteu and Patrik Simpson, Rita Cosby, Steve Sadow, TMZ, TMZ.com, The O'Quinn Law Firm, Virgie Arthur
A young assistant D. A. by the name of Sarah Slice may not be back in court again. After Larry Birkhead testified that he felt like Slice had been inappropriate and wanting him to “ramp up” his testimony is Slice gone? Sarah Slice did not return to court after the lunch break and at the close of court another employee from the District Attorney’s office came in and picked up Slices papers and brief case. Slice did not answer her phone or return calls after court on Monday.
Sandi Gibbons the spokeswoman from the district attorney’s office said, “The matter is being discussed, and no decision has been made as to her further role in this case.” Sarah Slice has been an attorney less than a year… OUCH what a way to learn on the job.
On a break later, outside of the courtroom, Dr. Kapoor’s attorney Ellyn Gerafalo, said, “We’re distressed to learn of this attempt at witness intimidation.”
Birkhead finished up his two day testimony yesterday and before he left the stand Larry Birkhead answered Superior Court Judge Robert Perry questioned Birkhead, about if “he took this as a negative comment on his testimony”, Birkhead answered that he did.
Renee Rose a Los Angeles assistant D. A. pressured Larry Birkhead to reveal that since Anna Nicole Smith’s death he had been paid over $2 million dollars for interviews.
Rose went on trying to pressure Birkhead to get him to say Anna Nicole Smith was an addict of which Birkhead would not go there with Rose. Birkhead again clarified his testimony by recounting how Anna Nicole Smith would tell him, “I’m not a drug addict.” At that point again Superior Court Judge Robert J. Perry turned to the Birkhead and asked if he ever had a conversation with Stern in which he used the word “addiction.” “No,” said Birkhead.
Assistant D. A. Renee Rose continued to press Birkhead on multiple issues, until the judge told her he had heard enough. “I think you’re done,” he said as she continued to raise new issues.
Next up was Dr. Nathalie Maullin an addiction specialist psychiatrist who has been practicing for six years which mean she had been a “specialist” for less than three years when she saw Anna Nicole Smith at Sinai Medical Center in the spring of 2006.
Where are these young guns ho “expert” witnesses coming from and did Maullin qualify as an “expert” or just a doctor/witness?
Dr. Maullin described Anna Nicole as a “difficult patient who was obviously going through withdrawal from multiple medications when she was admitted.” Maullin continued by saying that Smith came to the hospital in distress, sweating, having spasms in her arms and legs and with her eyes dilated. She said the symptoms showed that Smith had decided to “go cold turkey” and stop all drugs when she became pregnant, resulting in withdrawal. Maullin said she treated Smith for Methadone and Xanax addiction.
Maullin went on to testify that she talked to Smith and her companion Howard K. Stern to try to set up a program to wean Smith off of these two medications but found Anna Nicole Smith to be “uncooperative and hostile”. Maullin said the new regimen would have included hypnosis and acupuncture but Smith wasn’t interested. Smith angrily rejected a treatment program that included sessions with a psychologist and a complete cessation of sedatives and methadone.
Dr. Maullin testified that Anna Nicole would not “engage with her, would not make eye contact and was very hostile. She described Smith as saying; ‘”Give me my medication and leave me alone.” The psychiatrist said she told Smith and Stern that if she, [Anna Nicole Smith], wouldn’t comply with the hospital’s outpatient program, she needed to check into a rehab center. Smith’s reply was a stony glare. “When I asked her what she had been taking, she blew me off,” said Maullin.
Maullin said she contacted Smith’s physician, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor and learned he had prescribed seven different drugs to Smith during the time she was seeking relief from pain. Maullin said that when Smith was asked questions, she would reply: “Ask Howard.” Maullin went on to say that during Smith’s hospital stay, Maullin tried to regulate the former model’s use of methadone for pain and remove her from a number of drugs known as benzodiazepines.
Muillin ended Monday’s testimony by saying that Anna Nicole Smith was very hostile with an attitude of “Give me my medications and leave me alone”.
“Smith had said, ‘I’ll do anything for my baby” Dr. Maullin recalled and that the hospital staff gave Smith methadone and the sedative Aptiva to start the process of weaning her off the prescriptions.
Dr. Nathalie Maullin was to continue her testimony Tuesday under direct examination by Renee Rose and then would be handed off to the defense for cross examination.
Stay updated throughout today as we have court observers who will tell us what is going on in court. I wonder if Don Clark and Wilma Vicedomine will be called today as tomorrow is a full day off for the court.
UPDATE: Wilma Vicedomine, Don Clark with their attorney Neil McCabe appeared briefly as court began this morning. The Judge said they were not needed in court so they all three left. Our court observer said they did not know how long the judge might keep Clark and Vicedomine on hold.
UPDATE: Judge Perry has decided there was some type of communication problem with Stern’s lawyers and Don Clark, Wilma Vicedomine and agreed with their lawyer Neil McCabe that they be released from testifying in the preliminary hearing. The three Texans will be heading back to Texas to perhaps be called if and when this goes to trial.
©Rose Turner
October 20, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Tags: Adam Braun Esq., Anna Nicole Smith, Anna Nicole Smith nannies, Anna Nicole Smith's Estate, Assistant D. A. Renee Rose, Assistant D. A. Sarah Slice, Celebrity Trials, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn, Don Clark, Don Clark ex-FBI, Dr. Kapoor, Dr. Khris, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, Dr. Nathalie Maullin, Dr. Sandeep Kapoor, Ellyn Gerafalo Esq., G Ben Thompson, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, John J. Nazarian, John J. Nazarian P. I., Judge Robert Perry, L.A.D.A. spokeswoman Sandi Gibbons, Neil McCabe, Sinai Medical Center, Steve Sadow Esq., Superior Court Judge Robert Perry, The O'Quinn Law Firm, Virgie Arthur
Entries (RSS)
Good Morning Every One——From what I have read so far,Howard’s point.of Anna being her own boss,and doing what she wants is very plain for anyone to see.To me,maybe the judge will think different,it appears Howard has tryed everything in his power to help Anna,Anna was her own worse enemy,MY OPINION .Her mothers actions and lack of concern and love,was the root of all of Anna’s problem,then she just plain got a (big head) with money came power.No matter the age,we carry through life the desire for ma and dad’s love.To me a GREAT part of Anna’s problem.I could never, never, never forgive Vergie for the hateful way she treated in daughter,and she can stop trying to blame Howard,Looks to me like the state of Cal has NO CASE AGAINST HOWARD
So why isn’t Maullin also up on charges since she says she gave ANS methadone BELIEVING that she was an addict?
Well, if WV takes the stand, I hope she can maintain her composure. From reading her deposition, it seems that she can be a bit of a hot head. And I do not think the Judge will let her walk out to blow off steam. JMO
Btw, Larry sure made the most out of the conversations he had with Slice, lol. Bet she is steaming. The media made it sound like she kind of confronted him in the hallway. But the truth is she was assigned to walk with him. Larry was the State’s witness. Wonder how much is spin and how much is truth?
Rose [26] you know I was wondering what DC & WV testimonies’ would prove in this case, as you said they have no first-hand info so anything they contribute would be considered hearsay. I wonder if the Defense has some sort of strategy/plan for calling them as hostile witnesses.
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891#33393718
Liann [54] love the no-tell Hotel that was great
I was gonna ask whether it was two separate rooms, double bed or two singles and do they leave a mint on the pillow? Oh, what about room service and let’s not forget about the mini-bar ;-)
# 5 trina I can’t watch it on dial up
Can you give me a brief what they are talking about?
Thanks
Rose [7] what they are talking about in trina’s link is basically what you put in the article above but no mention of Sarah Slice not returning back to the courtroom after lunch yesterday.
Well it is a very good recap of what has happened. Started out with the DL stuff and video of LB outside the courthouse. And then switched to commentary of the prosecutor (with LB still on the stand) saying that Rose was annoyed and that LB had made stronger statements in the past that ANS would pop vicodin several times a day and wash pills down w/ booze And that in LB’s own words “Sometimes I didn’t even know if she was going to live, and they kept bringing more and more drugs into the home (we have read that at some point I’m sure) .”
~So Renee Rose got LB’s earlier statements before the judge, BFD, imo~
Then some legal annalyst came on and said that giving testimony advice is close to the ethical line. Telling someone to “ramp it up” is what you do to your star shortstop, not your star witness.
thanks JMA and trina, so at the end of all of this are we going to get into with all of the witnesses, which time were they telling the truth???
WHY were those three NOT needed?
Not needed for this morning? OR EVER?
A MIS-TRIAL PERHAPS?
Does anyone know if the Judge had all of the lawyers and the prosecution in his chambers?
Is someone in the Court, Rose that can tell you if they will be testifying at a later time, per the Judge’s comments?
Oh, so many questions…
My guess > if those three had no first hand information, those three did not know Anna and her lifestyle while she was alive… WHY TESTIFY AT ALL?
What the heck are they going to get up there and say on the stand?
How they (those three) conspired to take down HKS?
How those three contacted Larry and tried to get them to get rid of HKS, so he would be ’set’ for life?
How those three tried their very best to iliminate HKS from being Executor per ANS’s wishes in her Will?
Very interesting indeed!
The three are not needed because the State is still presenting their case. W & C are witnesses for the defendants, lol.
Seems to me Opri, as a good lawyer, wanted LB to emphasize certain things. That doesn’t make LB’s testimony in Florida less than truthful, it was just the strategy Opri used to further her representation of LB. LB’s current testimony seems to be sticking to the facts without pointed emphasis or drama. It’s a good lesson in the strategies lawyers use to keep their clients within the truth while encouraging the impressions they wish to instill.
As I am reading the articles,comming out of the courthouse,I have noticed the judge keeps asking if Howard said at any time”addict”,If he did,Howard would have known he was giving meds to a addict,because he did not,say ‘addict”Howard’s main purpose was to give meds to Anna for medical problems,the state CANNOT PROVE Howard had anything less than honorable intentions as FAR AS GIVING ANNA MEDS.
#14 Beverly I agree didn’t some say even Harvey Levin said he did not see enough to hold HKS for trial?
I just posted an up date to the article:
UPDATE: Judge Perry has decided there was some type of communication problem with Stern’s lawyers and Don Clark, Wilma Vicedomine and agreed with their lawyer Neil McCabe that they be released from testifying in the preliminary hearing. The three Texans will be heading back to Texas to perhaps be called if and when this goes to trial.
Thanks Rose…
Yes, I remember DC’s untrained assistant stating in a few of her posts awhile back, how they (all of the TX gang) would be there everyday at the prelim!
What? Afraid they would get BOOed for their lies and unethical procedures in starting this case to begin with??
They should REIMBURSE the fine accommodations and the first rate air fare they received for doing nothing then? ;)
I myself never read about Anna’s involement with another phychiatrist untill now,and the more that is being said the more you could see Anna was boss over everyone.I like Dr Maullin idea of inhouse treatment.Anna needed a workup from top to bottom,and her systoms carefully watched.With all this ,how can anyone say Howard did not care,Like I said before Vergie could not and did not do anything for her Daughter,Howard got the result,so now,Vergie wants to come out squeaky clean,and dump on Howard.I cannot get TMCon my computer,when I try the computer shuts down,but I sure hope he said it,
I have just one thing to say….
Who is going to help DC and the other get their tails from between their legs. Where did all of that “We will show you” bullshit go to?
A communication problem between the hostile witness’s and the Defense Attorney…WV must have been showing some serious hostility like she did when she and DC were interviewing Big Moe that was probably the communication problem ;-)
DiamondGirl [19] I agree, and why is it now they have nothing to say.
Oh so McShame was acting Attorney for both DC & WV in Cali, umm does this mean O’Quinn now knows who WV is and whether she is male or female
Rose~~ does this mean DC still cannot sit in the courtroom and observe you know in case he is called back.
I would think people should remember that LB was doing as his attorney DO told him to do and say skirting a very fine line.He was trying to make Anna come back and face him in his quest for custody of dannielynn and you certainly can see why Anna resented that fact. DO put a lot out their that I don’t think LB wanted outafter all he would not want the mother of his supposed child.So far LB did good and seems to be straight forward.
#JMA yes DC cannot sit in on any of this hearing nor can he sit in on any of this if it goes to trial… I think Sadow tried the “checkmate” move???
Rose [22] awe poor poor wannabe PI if DC is not there to get her the courtroom insight whatever will she feed her flock of Trolls. Awe boohoo my heart is pumping purple peanut butter for her :-( NOT cause she can continue to feed them the same old crap she has been feeding them, you know the “wait and see” “I cannot reveal that” and so on and so on.
Beth [17] yes I agree they WV, DC or maybe McCabe [he was their Attorney] should reimburse the Defense for those lovely accommodations.
I think I’m beginning to see/read a trend.
VA Supporters: There’s something wrong with the Bahamas courts, the Florida courts, the Florida COA, the Texas COA, the Texas Supreme court, various Federal District courts and now early grumblings about the SC court and now Judge Perry in CA.
ANS/HKS Supporters: There’s something wrong with the Harris County court.
If one wished to use this “psychic input”, I believe it may show HKS and ANS/DL/Estate are in pretty good shape.
Excerpts:
–However, under questioning by a judge, Dr. Nathalie Maullin said she never used the words “addict” or “addiction” when discussing the celebrity model’s problems with her, her personal doctor Sandeep Kapoor or her boyfriend-lawyer Howard K. Stern.
Maullin, who treated Smith during a brief hospital stay when she was pregnant in April, 2006, was quizzed by Superior Court Judge Robert J. Perry on the addiction issue.
“She was never trying to get high?” he asked.
“I never thought she was trying to get high. I think she wanted to tune out,” the psychiatrist said.
Maullin said she treated Smith when she in apparent withdrawal from pain and anti-anxiety medications. Smith had legitimate pain issues that were being treated with a combination of drugs, she testified.–
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/U….10-19-0 5-31-25
Just stepping in again… it is a quiet Tuesday without the news of TX on the witness stand!
From: DW [25]
“..Dr. Nathalie Maullin said she never used the words “addict” or “addiction” when discussing the celebrity model’s problems with her, her personal doctor Sandeep Kapoor or her boyfriend-lawyer Howard K. Stern.”
&
“Maullin said …. Smith had legitimate pain issues that were being treated with a combination of drugs, she testified.”
EXPERT PROFESSIONAL WITNESS, WHO TREATED ANS…
STATES:
> NEVER USED THE WORDS ADDICT WHILE TREATING ANS
> SMITH HAD LEGITIMATE PAIN ISSUES… FROM ANOTHER DOCTOR (expert witness)
* Well there go all of the charges against HKS except maybe the medicine in his name one, s/b a misdemeanor b/c it was done for privacy issues for a public figure… Look how many doctors and nurses have got fired for selling public figure’s medical info to the tabloids!
* Kapoor will most likely get all charges dropped
* Dr. E might get slapped on the wrist for writing too many scripts at one time…
THE END – of my scenario of justice on these charges! ;)
Have a nice evening everyone…
Have to take off, but I was hoping there would be more news of what went on this afternoon in court.
Last update was at 11:40 am PT, no news after lunch?
Well.get me a big hanky,or maybe a vomit pail.Just read where the poor investigators from Texas working for Vergie feel harrassed,CRY ME A RIVER,If it is not “poor grandma” or a ‘aneurism”now comes whinning of being harrassed,All I can say is O SAD,TO BAD,There were two people put in jail,who were also Harrassed by Vergie and her investigators,and lawyer,A DISABLED MOTHER,SO Vergie can take home millions HA HA,they make me sick,THAT HAS GOTTEN TO BE A BIG PITY POT FOR ALL THERE FAT BUTTS. MY OPINION
I cannot believe what kind of a MORON would use Cal money they do not have to bring a case it took two years to investigate and than come up with a phychiatrist,that blows it wide open.If Howard ,Anna and her doctor was not told anything about Anna being a addict,than how in hell would the AG office come up with Anna is a addict.Anna HAD MEDICAL PROBLEMS,Maybe Don Clark AND VERGIE.SORRY THERE WRONG
repost
~~~~
“To bring this POS prosecution into an American Court room is a disgrace.
LB was supposed to hand-wring about poor little drug-damaged DL, Dr. Maullin was supposed to pretend to have treated a ‘known addict’ and say other Doctors and HKS fed her drugs after she left the almighty Cedars-Sinai for no good reason and I suppose Big Moe was to have provided ‘details’ of who shot up who with what drug when while wickedly laughing (who knows) – how dare these agents of government try to screw with citizens like this, demanding ‘ramping up’ what would amount to false testimony!
Slice down, Dr. Maullin disgraced (Pharmacists aren’t taken that seriously anyway) – who’s next?
Posted on Oct 20th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean”
(&)
“.. The nature of opiates and benzos is that any one could become physically dependent on them when used AS DIRECTED through no fault of their own. Example, someone taking Percocet for a few weeks with a broken leg might very well experience withdrawal symptoms when the medication is stopped; hardly an addict except in the eyes of Renee and her sick crew.
That’s just the nature of the drugs, and the human system. This careless tossing about of terms like addiction and withdrawal is dangerous – heavens knows how many LE people are listening to this and will improperly harass, disrespect or even charge citizens out there thinking this crap prosecution represents the real law.
Drag the miserable TX crew in there to explain to the Judge where Renee got her silly notions and false information.
Posted on Oct 20th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean”
~~~~
* WELL STATED, VERY WELL STATED!!!
Might be a predicament … how to bring in the pharmacists who filled all those prescriptions to testify when you haven’t indicted them as one of the chain of enablers. It’s rough being a prosecutor in LA.
Rox #69 from the previous thread, I get it I must log in and my name should not change. I did not type anything but Liann in name box and that is why I questioned and that is fact, after I posted I looked and my posting name included more then what I put in the name box. I am logged in now and I think I should have no problem. I am sorry. It is wonky with FireFox-if I abbreviate it seems to throw spelling out of whack on posts and I am one that needs my spell check, Just ask my chat friends
, anyways thanks again. I agree I should have e-mailed. (I was confused, nothing new).
11153. (a) A prescription for a controlled substance shall only be
issued for a legitimate medical purpose by an individual practitioner
acting in the usual course of his or her professional practice. The
responsibility for the proper prescribing and dispensing of
controlled substances is upon the prescribing practitioner, but a
corresponding responsibility rests with the pharmacist who fills the
prescription.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=hsc&group=11001-12000&file=11150-11180
11156. (a) Except as provided in Section 2241 of the Business and
Professions Code, no person shall prescribe for, or administer, or
dispense a controlled substance to, an addict, or to any person
representing himself or herself as such, except as permitted by this
division.
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, “addict” means a person
whose actions are characterized by craving in combination with one or
more of the following:
(A) Impaired control over drug use.
(B) Compulsive use.
(C) Continued use despite harm.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a person whose drug-seeking
behavior is primarily due to the inadequate control of pain is not an
addict within the meaning of this section.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=hsc&group=11001-12000&file=11150-11180
Houston, I think we have a problem.
So many interesting and thought provoking posts at TMZ, I am looking forward to what the court observers has to say and who is next tomorrow on the stand. Is there any clue?
Perezhilton has a picture of Larry and DL at the punkin patch. She is so so so darn cute.
trina #34, Very well said!, I wonder if this LA case that seems to be floundering will effect/affect NY and TX, I wonder who will (ramp it up) next
I can not stand Perez and he is proud that he is the most hated celebrity web-site, but Thank you Ray!. She looks just like her momma.
http://perezhilton.com/
Ok, Just looking at that picture of DL, I am a grandma and I would never never in my life give up any days that I could spend with my grandchildren! Not for money or a rich lawyer or just the fact trying to prove something, To me whatever VA is after is not worth it, imo a child’s love and understanding is comprehended in a child’s mind by time spent with that child, Imo if VA really wanted to be in DL’s life she would walk away from the TX cabal and know her years are limited on this earth (as us all are) and do whatever she could to know her deceased daughter’s child (DL) and not knowing her daughter’s deceased son ( Daniel) over many years imo would compel normal grandparents (it they cared). . No matter what rift she had with the mother, no matter what. Time is to short and you can never get any time back. imo
I hope everyone is well and thank you Rose and Ken.
Hi Liann and everyone !
Yes, DL is a cutie alright! So happy and healthy looking! Mini Anna for sure!
#34 how true and yet funny at the same time! Great info post trina (32 & 33) thanks!
Sammy had a great link the other day with HL talking for over thirty mins!
It was shared at tmz and was well received. A truly great find!
I think I liked that better than the tmz half hour show. Thanks Sammy!
DesertWalker (30) “Might be a predicament … how to bring in the pharmacists who filled all those prescriptions to
testify when you haven’t indicted them as one of the chain of enablers. It’s rough being a prosecutor in LA.”
* EXCELLENT OBSERVATION!
LOL I was just thinking of McC and the other two musketeers (scratch that) we will go w/ Moe, Curley… well you get the pic!
continuing… I bet they KNEW they did not have to come and that the Prosecution was FAR from finished… it was done to TRY & make
the Defense of HKS looked at in a bad light! WRONG! Yet again they to me look like the fools who do not know how to follow instructions.
LOL then the get their patsy ‘q’ to TRY and write a desparaging article on the Defense team… COWARDS! Lousy, gossip filled stuff fed
straight from TX sounds like to me… Wish they wouldn’t post her crap at tmz… It should be passed by, but the intrigue is too strong!
I bet they will be made to come back if HKS doesn’t get most of his charges dropped. Who was it said that TX team may NOT be needed?
Is that the writing on the wall that everyone in that courtroom can NOW SEE this case STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN?
* CAN THE JUDGE AND PROSECUTERS SEE WHAT WE HAVE SEEN FOR OVER TWO YEARS?
THAT THE ONLY CONSPIRACY EVER in the ANS saga >>> WAS TX TRYING TO GET IN HKS & LB’S PLACE!
BET THE ONES THAT TX HAS TRAMPLED ON THRU THIS PROCESS ARE GETTING A LITTLE PEEVED:
RC, SC GANG, SC GANG’S LAWYER, CA DOJ/DA, and on and on and on….. ;) creeps, they will be shown soon for who and what they have done!
Hopefully within the next few days!!!
Bev-Have I ever told you that you “crack me” up?
Liann—-What makes me angry,one is Moe,who claims to be bodyguard to Anna,yet when he says he sees something he thinks is wrong,what does he do,NOTHING,what he should have done,is go up to Howard and ask,what are you doing,but of course (it is all a lie made up by moe)Again,moe and Tas were two people who showed how much Anna met to them by what they did on the day she died,Anna would not have been in feces if either Moe or Tas did what they were supposed to do,All these lying fools,I agree with Dr Maullin,Anna wanted to” tune out”She could not stand the pain of JUDUS (friends)the pain of a mother calling her a possible(M) and the pain of Daniel dying.never mind her physical pain.How different Anna life would have turned out if she had a mothers love,she never had that.
SUSIEQ 2—-It appears Team Texas can dish it out,but cannot take it without whinning,They are still trying to use the public for sympathy.I can tell you that ship has sailed.Only a few(Team Texas) left that do not know what Vergie is all about,and are sick to death of hearing her name. That BOO-HOO bit,does not play well anymore.
Well at least it stopped the three clowns from playing ‘BINGO’ during the prelim.
Beth #40 – thank you for your kind words. TMZ runs what they call Live Chat at 4:30pm est Monday through Friday. One can submit questions by clicking the comment box prior to the Chat. Harvey and crew review the questions in advance and answer those that are of general interest. I too prefer the Chat vs their televised program. Since HL is an attorney, I like his perspective on the legal issues. Repeat of the Chat is not always posted and if it is it never stays online for any duration. So glad that several of you had the opportunity of viewing the Chat before it was dropped into the “never to be found black hole”.
Lizzie #44 LOL Loved the “Bingo” comment. How appropriate. DC, WV, McC had a choice of 48 hr notification. Why not take it, Pirtle did. Oh well, what does one expect.
Morning Sammy! There are former live-chat videos on the bottom of that link you provided I think.
I liked the BINGO comment too! Very funny…
Well, looks like maybe the work hours will not be cut (for now) due to litigation by the company.
(per mail received anyway) Hope it lasts through the Holidays if so… LOL you have to be a lawyer to understand
anything in print almost from the ‘higher ups’ – sometimes I wonder if THEY even understand what is printed out!
I know they are always familiar w/ their ‘fine print’… ;)
Well I am off until later. Cold here this morning! BRRrrr………..
THE COMMENTS FOR THIS ARTICLE IS NOW CLOSE, JOIN US ON THE NEW ARTICLE FOR DISCUSSION AND A WRAP UP OF THE PRELIMINARY HEARING TO DATE.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/rose-blog/2009/10/21/did-larry-birkhead-lie-in-court-%E2%80%93-does-howard-k-stern-have-a-new-mercedes-benz/
Beth #46 – that’s great about the hours. A reprieve!!!!!
In regards to TMZ’s Chat, I don’t see past Chats listed however I do see replays for their TV show.
It’s a beautiful day here just like yesterday. It’s great after all the rainy/cloudy/chilly days we’ve had. I’m getting all the shrubbery trimmed and other plants cut back for Winter. Leaves are changing to their Fall color and then they fall to the ground which becomes another issue. Oh well, the lawncare guy can take care of it.
Well, I’m headed back outside. Everyone have a really great day.