Bonnie Stern’s Latest Filings in California in Arthur vs. Stern
Posted by Rose in All Things Anna Nicole Smith, Amanda Bush, Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, Bryan Cave LLP, CBS-ET, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Chip Babcock, Dannielynn, Debunking the myths on ALL cases related to Anna Nicole, Diana Marshall, Entertainment Tonight, Harvey Levin, High Proflie Trials, Howard K Stern, John Patton, Larry Birkhead, Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Nancy Hamilton, Rose Turner, TMZ, TMZ.com, Teresa Stephens
Getting ready for the hearing on July 14 in California, this is Bonnie Stern’s Opposition with Exhibit in response to Arthur’s Request for the Bankruptcy Court in Central California to Abstain from Ruling on the Adversarial Proceeding filed by Arthur and Arthur’s Request that the Bankruptcy place a “stay” on all proceedings there pending the outcome of the Texas District Court lawsuit in Harris County.
July 2, 2009 Bonnie Stern’s in Opposition to Arthur’s Motion to Abstain and for Stay on Adversarial Proceedings in the California Bankruptcy Court.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2184.
July 2, 2009 Bonnie Stern’s Exhibit 1 Filed with Opposition to Arthur’s Motion to Abstain and for Stay on Adversarial Proceedings in the California Bankruptcy Court. This is a copy of Arthur’s Second Amended Original Petition filed in the 280th District Court for Harris County in the State case of Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern, TMZ et. al.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2180.
July 2, 2009 Bonnie Stern’s Exhibit 2 Filed with Opposition to Arthur’s Motion to Abstain and for Stay on Adversarial Proceedings in the California Bankruptcy Court. This is a Texas Supreme Court case presented as case law of libel per Texas case authority.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2181.
July 2, 2009 Bonnie Stern’s Exhibit 3 Filed with Opposition to Arthur’s Motion to Abstain and for Stay on Adversarial Proceedings in the California Bankruptcy Court. This is Scott Bly’s first Declaration in Response to Craig Ball’s Report to the Court in Texas.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2182.
July 2, 2009 Bonnie Stern’s Exhibit 4 Filed with Opposition to Arthur’s Motion to Abstain and for Stay on Adversarial Proceedings in the California Bankruptcy Court. This is Scott Bly’s second Declaration in Response to Craig Ball’s Report to the Court in Texas.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2183.
July 2, 2009 Bonnie Stern’s attorney, Susan I. Montgomery Declaration to the Court that the electronic filing system for the Central District Bankruptcy Court was off line on June 30 and July 1, therefore Ms. Montgomery email copies to lawyers and sent a copy to the Court and then filed when the system came back online on July 2, 2009.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2179.
These are the latest filings in the Texas – California cases in our download section opened to All not just members of Rose Speaks.com.
©Rose Turner
June 4, 2009
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.
The expressions in this blog article are based on the opinions of Rose Turner or our featured authors, please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this blog article are the opinions and sole property of the blog site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.
Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Tags: Anna Nicole Smith, Art Harris, Bonnie Stern, CBS-ET, Celebrity Trials, Charles "Chip" Babcock, Craig Ball, Dannielynn, Diana Marshall Esq., Harvey Levin, High Profile Trials, Howard K Stern, L. Lin Wood, Luke Lantta, Lyndal Harrington, Rose Turner, Scott Bly, Susan I. Montgomery Esq., Teresa Stephens
Entries (RSS)
[...] about Howard Stern as of July 4, 2009 Bonnie Stern’s Latest Filings in California in Arthur vs. Stern – rosespeaks.com 07/04/2009 Getting ready for the hearing on July 14 in California, … vs. [...]
Bonnie’s attorney Susan Montgomery really spelled it out clearly!
Bonnie’s Declaration after the Memo of Points by S. Montgomery is a very, very interesting read also!
Ref: p. 8 “I previously filed a special appearance to challenge personal jurisdiction in Texas. That motion was filed more than a year ago and has not been decided.”
“…travel to Texas, particularly as the hearings are repeatedly continued, I attempted to appear in pro per telephonically. The Texas court denied my request to appear, even as it considered a contempt motion filed against me.”
p. 9 > talks about the reports B.S. filed to refute the false allegations of the Special Master’s report.
Bonnie also states that since she cannot be represented in TX and the Plaintiff (VA/McC) wants to use the info in the bankruptcy proceeding… she (Bonnie) requested through S. Montgomery (CA lawyer helping her now in the bankruptcy hearing) to have McC COMMUNICATE w/ Miss Montgomery.
MCCabe REFUSES TO TALK TO B.S.’s ATTORNEY IN CA!!!
** Just WTH does that tell everyone??? Even the VA supporters cannot say that is NORMAL! **
It states that McC sent B.S. e-mails threatening to have her held in contempt and taken against her will to Texas.
IMO > that is an Officer of the Court who is harassing a defendant, along with all of the other defendants he has harassed in the BOGUS case!
“Additionally, Mr. McCabe failed to give me timely notice of rulings by the Texas court, including a decision by the court on May 22, 2009, the Friday before the Memorial Day holiday, that I was not required to send to the Special Master my computers because they were filled with private client information. On May 26, 2009, my assistant unnecessarily shipped my laptop computers and hard drives to the special Master. It was not until May 27, 2009 that I received a copy of an e-mail sent by Mr. McCabe indicating that the Court had changed its position and I was not required o ship my computers. Mr. McCabe refuses to speak with my attorney Ms. Montgomery.”
Rose, I just Love the new look on the top of the blog!
Hope everyone had a nice Holiday yesterday!
I hope that the CA Bankruptcy Court can NOW see what this TX State case is about!
Just looked at the HKS/2 Doctors thread on TMZ. I had no idea that Wilma used to post as ‘Law’ on the ANS boards! This Einy poster is stating that it is her that contacted her and sent DWS’s picture of him after he died to her. She also said that it was Wilma who told her that the O’Q firm hired her to go on the internet and I guess ‘mingle’ (my word) with the bloggers. I have always heard stories that it was Wilma that started initiating these wars over the past months / years now.
LOL Einy states also; This is only Part 1, and that Part 2 will come out the next time she gets pushed to tell it… (my wording)
Maybe the defendants should do a sworn deposition on this Einy blogger?
Well, then…. maybe Wilma SHOULD be brought into the blogger case? Especially if she was hired by the plaintiff’s law firm to start a bunch of this crap?
This idea I got from reading another post that had suggested that. Man, and Wilma is still posting daily over at Topix! I wonder if the other defendants and their lawyers know that an employee of O’Q’s / McC’s / DC’s is PRESENTLY STILL BLOGGING on this case? Stirring up trouble so they can get others to blog against the VA’s supporters?
* If the true instigators were named, this whole fake case would go away as it would expose the plaintiff, and her attorneys for being at the core of its beginning? Where the hell did wilma get that picture of DWS after he died? Was it from the SC bunch? Wouldn’t that show collusion with the plaintiff, the plaintiff’s counsel and FS, the one that stole everything of Anna’s from the Bahamas’ house after she died?
I am looking forward to part 2 of this poster’s story!
OMG! It was quiet here so I went and looked at ‘T’ … LOL I guess almost an hour ago this very thing I typed in #3 was also being typed about over there!!
WWice is saying they do have the pictures and they did not come from FS… >> Sure! I would bet differently!
For someone who claims to be so smart, doesn’t seem so to me! *Maybe she does need to be; ADDED TO THE STATE CASE? ;)
#2 Beth I read all that as well and all I can say is it is very troubling when Defendants and Lawyers are treated with so much disdain by Texas Courts and Texas Lawyers. What does that say about the law in that State?corrupt maybe??? Why is it so open thats what I want to know….
Why was Mccabe given details before Bonnie was about Her Computers? If Bonnie did not have to send her computers after all why did Ball inspect the hard drives and make that report???
So much is wrong here and yes including Willy blogging and blaming us for their crap…. but they have always done that as we KNOW.
This case start to get to me all the time VA and MacCebe went in TV calling HS murder it was OK now they drag every one to court over no reason .It amaze me when a will known person died with drugs it is not his or her fault some one else gave to them as if they have now brain .
Beth [3 & 4] Whack A Mole said Wilma sent her the picture of DWS but she claims that Emmett gave it to Wilma. I’m sure you have seen just as the rest of us have those hardcore VA supporters cover each other’s asses.
I agree with you concerning WV being added to this suit.
What is you thought on the poster Eric Dick [Lynda’s council] posting on Topix? Do you really think that is him? IMO it is not, there is no way anyone’s Attorney is going to go on Topix and post back and forth with this morons especially after all the “Dick” jokes they were making.
PS,
Here is Whacko’s confession.
Page: 1528
Post: #83061
Date: Sunday Feb. 8
Whack A Mole
Salem, OR
Reply »
Oh the drama……Okay, I got the photo from Wilma. Go to Roses and ask Wilma about that. Emmett says he gave it to Wilma. Go to Emmett and ask him about that. I put the photo for the same reason Emmett released it…or whoever.. To show that Stern was lying when he said the photo didn’t exist. Now you can think I’m cruel for showing it, but what does it say for the man who took that awful picture? Oh, you didn’t ask about that, did ya?
My computer is available anytime someone wants to come have a look at it. It will show exactly where I got that photo from. How was I supposed to know that Lin Wood hadn’t been told by Howard that the original of that picture has fallen into someone’s hands? Did I know what Lin Wood was going to say on LKL? If he wants to know how I got that picture, he can call me. He can get my number from Emmett.
That picture was truly sad. You might want to ask again why it was taken. You might want to ask someone else how they got it. I’ve told you why I showed it.
Correction s/b “your” thought not “you”
OMG! No I did know that story…
But that mole must be whacked… as it would not be the original, and if I recall right didn’t HKS state he did not want to take the pic but Anna insisted so she would truly know he was dead… something to that effect. So, that would make this mole’s statement a complete lie:
“To show that Stern was lying when he said the photo didn’t exist.” > Absolutely a complete lie!
God! I wouldn’t be able to read those people all of the time… their comments are crazy!
* I think Moe or FS somehow got that camera, picture, or memory card and sold it to TX is what I think! JMHO on that one…
I remember that we all had a discussion about the pic here, I had never heard these stories before from this einy or mole person though.
LOL! What monikers! I think JMA’s is the BEST! “Justice My Ass”
heath,
Hope you can make CHAT tonight at 8 blog time (I hope I have Sammy’s time correct…)
Yes, I agree with you about Bonnie’s computers… I DO think that Ball searched for more than the Court said too, and I think he told McCabe on the down-low. JMO on that one. I have come NOT to trust anyone connected with that Law Firm!
quote from B.Stern that I reposted on #2 this page… (from the DOCS that Rose & Ken put in this article)
“It was not until May 27, 2009 that I received a copy of an e-mail sent by Mr. McCabe indicating that the Court had changed its position and I was not required o ship my computers.”
** WELL! If they (hard drives) were NOT needed as she states… THEN there should have NEVER been such a STUPID REPORT from Ball accusing her of deleting stuff and tell the Court to give her sanctions!!!
There are SO MANY ISSUES that an appeal would COMPLETELY DROP THIS CASE; like a hot potato! Dismiss it for lack of any use of correct legal standards!
On the subject of MJ…
I went to Wiki and searched the “Jacksons” to see what the brothers had been doing for past years… since I had not heard too much publicly.
Wow! Do you know that Randy’s ex- wife (who had twin boys w/ Randy) divorced him and married Jermain? Then they had twin boys!
It was interesting, like a soap-opera really. I have only serched the personal life of Randy and Jermaine from the initial Jacksons wiki page so far.
* It did state that move cause friction with-in the family… You think? (I believe Jermaine has 8 children from many women, and he only stayed w/ his brother’s ex-wife for a few years) That would make four of these grandchildren of Joe and Katerine’s both cousins & step-brothers… w/ the same mom.
Have to go take care of some things, I will try to come on later and make it into CHAT this evening. Happy Sunday to ALL.
Beth [9] right Anna requested that the picture be taken, so Howard complied. Howard told how he took the picture so yes Whacko’s statement is just that WHACKO.
Wasn’t it said that Moe did take the memory card out of the camera?
I agree that picture and many more could have been sold but maybe not for $$$ but to keep certain somebody’s out of a criminal investigation ;-) this being my opinion of course. I mean come on since Anna’s death others have hit the airwaves confessing to giving Anna the medications.
Thanks I think my moniker is very suiting considering how this saga is being played out which IMO is more about GREED not JUSTICE.
Beth ~~ did you know back in 1994 Tito Jackson’s ex-wife Delores had supposedly drown in a pool but later in 1998 her boyfriend Donald Bohana was convicted of second-degree murder and was sentenced to 15 years in her death. Prosecutors said that Delores Jackson had been beaten and choked
Was there ever a picture of Mr./Mrs. Stern released to print holding the new baby?
Beth and JMA – I never felt it was strange to take a picture of a deceased person whether they were an adult, child or baby. I’m basically a private person and don’t often share personal stories of myself. 45 years ago, I went into labor early at 8 months. My son died 5 hours later without the opportunity of seeing him or more importantly never a chance of holding him. The only thing I have is a photo of a beautiful baby peacefully asleep. To this day I miss him. As life happens I never was pregnant again.
Investigators focus on five Jackson doctors
They want to know who prescribed drugs for the singer, especially the powerful sedative Diprivan.
By Scott Glover, Rong-Gong Lin II and Cara Mia DiMassa
July 5, 2009
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-jackson-death5-2009jul05,0,2084621.story
7/5/2009 7:00 AM GMT
Joe Jackson in third autopsy claim
Michel Jackson’s father reportedly wants a third autopsy conducted on his son’s body.
http://news.ph.msn.com/entertainment/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3437371
How ironic weren’t we just the other day we were discussing the possibility of Nanny Grace possibly being Michael’s secret girlfriend.
**************************************************************************
7/5/2009 7:00 AM GMT
Michael Jackson ‘dated nanny’
Michael Jackson was secretly dating his children’s nanny, it has been claimed.
The romance between the ‘Thriller’ star – who died of a suspected cardiac arrest last week – and Ugandan-born Grace Rwaramba was reportedly an open secret among the singer’s staff and his three children, Prince Michael, 12, Paris Katherine, 11 and six-year-old Prince Michael II, even looked on her as their mother.
http://news.ph.msn.com/entertainment/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3437369
Sammy1 [15] I know it must have been hard sharing your tragedy with us and I am so sorry for your loss.
It is not unheard of having a picture taken of a loved one. I have a friend who loss her son who was only three, [he was struck by a car] and she had someone take a picture of him in the casket. This was very hard on my friend she was so grief stricken by his death she had to be hospitalized for sometime but she told me she is grateful to have that picture.
Also, I think nowadays when a child is loss during delivery the hospital offers to take a picture, I know when another one of my friends granddaughter died during delivery the hospital took a picture of her.
Chat room is open for those who wish to join.
Just finished watching Geraldo [thank God he was off tonight] it seems Dr. Sandeep Kapoor is under investigation as one of the five doctors in the Michael Jackson case. IMO this does not look good for him in his upcoming case in the Anna Nicole saga.
Wow! JMA Thanks, I will try to catch that later then…
Good night Liann! I saw you type in chat just as I was leaving…
I am off, have a great evening all.
Great partial post from Swims… the post was too long. (p. 88)
“- Did TMZ’s true ’step-brother’ story damage VA’s chance getting custody/visitation with DL? Not according to the only Court that counted, in The Bahamas. That Court literally tossed the ‘evidence’ out the door. What fantasy Court sometime in the future, if ever, does VA expect to be ‘interfered with’ because of an old story few people ever read in the first place? It’s too bad the State Court hasn’t apparently bothered to read the ‘bloggers’ lawsuit.
- Did Bonnie ever ‘direct’ any bloggers to do something that was necessary or timely or meaningful or even in line with what HKS/LB were actually doing? No.
HKS sued the ring-leader, O’Q, for his February/March 2007 defamation only. O’Q claimed Clark/Wilma as his employees, after a long drawn-out denial process, ultimately shielding them from personal responsibility. Wood never indicated he would go after the middle-people or fall-guys lined up on the blogs by the TX cabal.
Posted at 7:19PM on Jul 5th 2009 by Only swim in the Ocean”
* Wood may not go after those bloggers but I SURE HOPE THE OTHER DEFENDANTS PULL THEM IN TO PROVE THOSE SWORN AVADAVITS OF McC’s star witnesses are false, and WV needs to fess up to her role in egging on these blog wars! JMHO on that!
** I think if they are ADDED, McC will HAVE NO CHOICE but to back down!
He NEVER had any legal basis and he never will! There was NO CONSPIRACY TO DEFAME!
> you cannot make something that was not there! all McC got was a Judge who allowed him to ‘play’ and destroy people’s lives…
IMO They are the ones who need to be prosecuted!
OMG! Maybe WV is running scared?
LOL here is a tidbit from p. 550 –‘T’
> “hope I’m misreading this and this is not a threat because I’m about all threatened out at this point.” (from someone not vice…)
> “Vise morphs from investigator to magician when she is called out. Wish she would do another trick, the vanishing act is old already.” >> that was from; “Poof” lol ;)
Well, I am done checking it all out now. Nite.
For those of us that follow Sarah Palin, Mudflats has new articles.
http://www.themudflats.net/
Beth [22] it was hilarious reading the meltdown over at the dark side. Yeah looks like the old coots are turning on WV. I tried to tell WV that is was Einy & Kerry who started that rumor about her and DC {{{shrug}}} oh well what’s a girl to do
Sharpton: Will hearing insensitive to Jacksons
By ANTHONY McCARTNEY, AP
38 minutes ago
LOS ANGELES — The Rev. Al Sharpton says it’s “almost insulting” to the Jackson family to hold a hearing Monday to designate two men as temporary administrators of the pop superstar’s estate.
http://www.comcast.net/articles/music/20090705/US.Michael.Jackson/
In reference to my post, #25 after reading the article, why now is Sharpton claiming this hearing is insulting to the Jackson family. They had no problem running to the courts on Monday asking Katherine to be name temporary administrators. Of course, this was before the Will was produced so I guess they figured everything would be pretty much cut and dry and the Judge would appoint Katherine as the administrator.
All I can say is I thank God I am not part of Hollyweird cause to me it looks like for those who are seem to have greedy families members who follow.
Unless they come up with a will that gives the family control over everything, they (it sounds like) will basically contest it. Why can’t they just honor MJ’s wishes? Oh, I know, because of the $$$ involved. Let the games begin.
LOL JMA I just finished reading the article…
I was thinking the same thing!
These two men are smart business wise to make the Jackson Family Trust very rich, and yes they do get a fee for their work…
I thought maybe Al was talking about it being insensitive for Katherine to go to Court the day before the Memorial to see if she would get more than temp custody. Then later in the article the only thing listed for today is about Katherine’s being a temp administrator for MJ. (custody date is for later, now)
So… what is Al really talking about then?
I think he just likes to talk and get the attention. I don’t dislike the man but sometimes he does seem to interject himself where he shouldn’t.
Ken [29] I agree same goes for Jesse Jackson. Yep IMO those two are always throwing themselves into the limelight.
Beth [28] yeah by Sharpton the family wants to see if another Will emerges.
Ken [29] in reference to “Unless they come up with a will that gives the family control over everything” that was my exact thought!
correction #26 s/b greedy “family” members not “families”
Oops meant Ken #27
Wow cannot believe Casey Kasem did his final countdown. I can remember listening to him on those long Sunday drives when I was a kid.
Yes I remember Casey very well also!
Al and Jesse do not need to interject at all… This is not a civil rights issue.
Jesse Jackson family has been ‘tainted’ a bit by his son’s (the Congressman) role in wanting Obama’s Senate seat in Illinois, I think.
If I were that family I would trust that these men, especially the lawyer who obtained the Sony catalog (as without that MJ would have not had too much — due to the way he spent money… like Evils did)
My guess, is that the family wants to make Neverland like Graceland so the family, and their generations can profit…
I bet the Executors do NOT do that, or if they do they end up doing it… it might not be exactly like the family wants.
I honestly think this ‘wishy-washy’ bit Debbie Rowe is playing is only to get one last settlement. That would be ’selling’ the children for the third time I think.
Well, I am off. Have a great day everyone!
Beth [34] on LKL last night Jermaine was pushing the issue of Michael being buried at Neverland.
As for Debbie Rowe, IMO she should not get custody of the two eldest children. Honestly, I am hoping another Will does emerge naming Nanny Grace as the one Michael wished to take care of the children.
GOOD MORNING ALL—I hope you all had a great holiday,mine was beautiful,I have just caught up on reading,and could not be happier for Lyndal,I will be glued to TV tomorrow,and I have a feeling there is going to be a riot at STAPLES,and outside,If you watch what is going on in the Michael Jackson case,Joe Jackson is not in the will,and they want him kept away from Michael,s children,BECAUSE OF HIS ABUSE OF MICHAEL,Virgie better watch what is going down,because she wil get the same,I could not help but laugh how fast Jerry Brown took to the TV,now if you took all the (enablers) to Michael,you need a separate Island.I am praying Dr Kapoor is cleared.I cannot wait ,to get what meds Michael died of,First Michael could not have taken a IV med on his own,because the IV DRIP would have still been in his arm,when found,
Hi Bev, glad to hear you had such a wonderful weekend must say though, I did miss you.
My opinion concerning the latest on Dr. Kapoor, if he is found to be involved/connected in the Michael Jackson saga IMO it will make only him look worse not Dr. E or Howard. This being just my opinion of course, but I see the charges for Howard going away due to he did not have the authority to write script’s.
PS,
I keep meaning to compliment on the sites new look, to me it is a relaxing look ;-)
Judge backs Michael Jackson lawyer and friend
By ANTHONY McCARTNEY, AP
30 minutes ago
LOS ANGELES — A judge said Monday that Michael Jackson’s longtime attorney and a family friend should take over the pop singer’s estate for now, rejecting a request from Jackson’s mother to be put in charge.
Shoot forgot link #38
http://www.comcast.net/articles/music/20090705/US.Michael.Jackson/
Well the local police called in the DEA after the autopsy was done. Jerry Brown didn’t get involved until AFTER the will was announced. 20% of the estate going to charity……and guess which branch of the government handles that………….. drum roll………………… the Attorney Generals office !
JMA—-Thank you,my sister, her son, and grandkids and a another couple went to Springfield after leaving Vermont,and we were on the river in my nephew,s boat watching the fire works go off the springfield bridge,I have never seen anything like them,Lord were they beautiful.Michael Jackson death,to me is proving,exactly what Howard said,Anna was her own boss,and so was Michael,no matter what you do,it boils down to the doctors,and the pharmacist.it hurts so much to hear how Michael.s father kept calling Michael ugly,I knew he was destroying his face for a reason,and some of the public making fun of him.It is a shame McCabe cannot understand,Virgie will never get money or Dannielynn.Virgie was just as abusive a Joe Jackson,and with Michael,s death,there will be NO TOLERANCE FOR VIRGIE,S ABUSE OF ANNA.no matter what bloggers have to say,
Beverly [41] yes it is so much better watching the fireworks display while on a boat.
July 6, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Response to Larry Birkhead Motion to Compel which is set for a hearing on July 10, 2009. This Response refers to alleged compensation from the Estate (HKS), Harvey Levin, TMZ, and soon to be defendant CBS.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2185
July 6, 2009 Virgie Arthur’s Motion for Sanctions against Bonnie Stern, requesting that the Court Deny Bonnie Stern’s Objection to Jurisdiction, strike defendant Bonnie Stern’s Answer and enter a Default Judgment against Bonnie Stern.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2186
July 6, 2009 Notice of Hearing on Bonnie Stern in regards to the Motion for Sanctions Arthur filed, the hearing date is July 17, 2009, the same day and Teresa Stephens hearing to Show Cause why she should not be held in Contempt.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2187
July 6, 2009 the Proposed Order for the Court to sign based on the Hearing held July 2, 2009 on Lyndal Harrington. This authorizes Craig Ball the Special Master to just go in and image the emails on the yahoo server for Harrington.
http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=2188
Wow
I am only on the 2nd page of the sanction request for Bonnie and I just want to point out where it says “court ordered undersigned counsel to prepare and application for a capias”. There it is folks. Now for all those folks who thought that myself or Rose was full of shit, and to you Melinda Burleson saying that I lied and tried to blame it on Lyndals daughter, there it is for all to see.
Haven’t read emails yet but when did it become “doing business” when a friend helps out a friend do some things in her business?
The emails so far the one where it’s talking about ordering “goodies for the computer” it’s pretty obvious when put in context with the email that Rose is talking about Ken ordering stuff for the computer. Another is talking about what the headlines are saying about LB. (Has anyone else noticed some of those emails are bits and pieces and some don’t have the full headers?) The one between Howard and Bonnie… so what? I don’t see any guts there folks. It’s HKS telling Bonnie he doesn’t need something transcribed. What’s the big deal about transcribing something. It’s something SOMEONE ELSE said in a public interview. Still not anything any of the defendants said. Ok and what does the email, from a company about how to increase traffic to you site, prove?
What is up with these emails? They are obvious copied and pasted and NOT the whole emails. They are out of sequence and really hard to read. Trying to confuse a judge maybe?
Finished emails and honestly, I hope I don’t offend Bonnie if she reads this but, it sounds to me like Bonnie wasn’t to business sauve and asked some friends who knew something about business to help her out. I still don’t see a huge bombshell here.
They haven’t stated a money amount in these filings. Isn’t there something about Montgomery saying that she expected Tx to issue a default judgement against Bonnie and there by throwing it into the CA courts because of the bankruptcy? If that is correct, I see this thing as a win for Bonnie. It would mean no more discovery, no depostition, no more nothing and she is out of it in TX.
I have never claimed to be well versed on the law and TX seems to be a Country/Island of their own imo or maybe it is just Harris County that makes the rules of law as they go imo ( I do not know ), But when is TMZ or CBS or LLW going to show that VA is a limited public figure and sought out the media with her Lawyers and who opened the door for anyone to ask or seek answers to their questions regarding their accusations, Because we all saw how they were playing to the media. I have a question, It is a hypothetical question, My question is if the plaintiff dies or is incapacitated from illness or mental limited capacity due to stroke or aneurysm in a defamation case if the plaintiff is limited on brain function because of illness and that their Lawyer states is so, Does not that make the case the solute??
New article up
I need to read the docs Rox, I am sorry I have not yet, But from reading your comments I am sure that I will see the holes as you have and I hope the she is out, When is the court date for Howard’s writ of Mandamus?
Holy Cow!
I honestly did not think to come and look on the old thread!
Nothing had been written past JMA’s 2:47 P.M. post for hours…
*SORRY FOR DUPLICATING THE DOCS!
You can move all my posts (and delete the docs links) here or on the new thread if you want to…
Great Post LIANN! [50]
Back to “Closer”, then “Raising the Bar” > Love the Legal Show!