John O'Quinn whispers to Debra Opri in court in Florida Feb. 2007

The Southern District Court in Florida issued an Order on October 14, 2008 for a hearing on October 17, 2008 at 1:30 PM. The hearing is to address John O’Quinn and The O’Quinn law firm’s Motion for Protective Order in relation to releasing financial information to Lin Wood except they are willing to release those 30 days before trial. The Motion before the Court is also asking that Howard K. Stern have no access because of “trust issues”.

The Court also issued an Order on October 15 to reset the Calendar Call Date from December 24 at 10 AM to December 23 at AM, due to a Court holiday.

Following the Wilma Vicedomine deposition on October 13, an alleged friend released the following information on October 14, which was sent to me.

“Per Targets (on Topix.net)
Wilma’s deposition was a smashing success and Stern and Wood are not happy about it.

…The depo lasted 10 hours and Wilma was represented by her own private attorney. Wilma told the truth and, just as we have been predicting all along, her testimony sucked the life out of Stern’s case.

…Klein is representing Clark today. [October 14]

…And that, my friends, is all I can say about it because that’s all I know. The contents of the depo itself is under seal. If any of it gets leaked, someone is going to jail.”

I am gathering from the above statement that Howard K. Stern in spite of his intense dislike for Texas and Houston in particular that he did in fact, [not as I predicted], go to Houston Texas to look Wilma Vicedomine eye to eye. It appears from Targets statement that Howard K. Stern overcame his dislike of Texas to see what Wilma had to say about her actions over the last year plus in his life and that of Anna Nicole Smith, Daniel Smith, Dannielynn Birkhead, etc.

Glad I did not have any money down on my bet. REMEMBER folks, anyone being deposed can share anything they want about the deposition, just as Pol’ and Patrik did to us, some of what they said following their depositions was published and some of it was off the record. There is NOTHING wrong with Wilma Vicedomine sharing the above information “on the record” via an alleged friend, spokesperson, to post on the internet. It is the parties, Howard K. Stern, Rita Cosby and Hachette that cannot release any information on any of the discovery, depositions etc.

It would appear if Targets statement turns out to be true that Wilma Vicedomine felt very good and confidant about her deposition.

I wonder if we will hear something from a “spokesperson” on behalf of Don Clark. Will Don Clark allow someone to address his deposition on the record and permit that “statement” to be put on the internet on his behalf?

In other news in the New York Court Howard K. Stern has added an additional attorney to his legal team, Amy Stewart of POGO filed for Pro Hac Vice status on October 1 and the Court approved that request with an Order on October 8, 2008.

Remember you can pick up all documents for all cases we are following in our download section, opened to ALL, not just members for Rose Speaks.com.

©Rose Turner
October 15, 2008
All Rights Reserved, do not reproduce in whole or in part without the express written consent of the author.

This article is the sole property of Rose Speaks unless otherwise stated. This article as with other articles is based on the opinion of Rose Turner, or our guest authors if so indicated. Please remember we are not lawyers and those opinions expressed here are each of our individual opinions and should not be taken as legal advice and/or legal opinions. The comments following this article are the opinions and sole property of the site members and do not necessarily reflect those of the site owners.

Please also read our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
118 Responses to “In Howard K. Stern vs. John O’Quinn and the O’Quinn Law Firm, the Court has issued an Order for a hearing for this Friday, October 17.”
  1. TZ says:

    That doesn’t make any sense. Didn’t Rita already throw WV and DC under the bus?? So unless Rita was lying (and we already saw what she tried to do in the Bahamas with the nannies- so who the hell knows!) How could it possibly “suck the life” out of Howard’s case??

    Also, as to what anyone on the “other side” has to say over at topix, I’d like to remind everyone that theses are the same people who are not only convinced that HKS is a double murder but actually try to argue that Larry isn’t DL’s real dad because, after all, we never did get to see the DNA result ourselves….On a personal note, lately a family member of mine has been getting on my case cause she says that I roll my eyes too much. Now please tell me; does trying to argue that Larry is not DL’s real father cause we never got to see the DNA results ourselves doesn’t warrant an eye roll?! I just don’t have the will power or the strength to not roll my eyes at that one.

  2. BEVERLY says:

    ROSE——I learned one thing about the people that post on Topix,They like to egg on posters.talk like mindless fools.Copy statements from all of us on your site,and pretend they have more information,and are connected to the people involved.Wilma V would say nothing different,you think that (wise A) would say she had a rough time(no way)On Topix they like showing the world,the same thing Virgie showed the world,A LOW CLASS INTELLIGIGENCE.Now if you give them a minute go over topix and read my statement.because that is what they are looking for,I know most of the farm land had a lot of cow maniure,butnothing like topix .

  3. raven says:

    Since I don’t know Targets, and since there’s no way to know what the circumstances are as to ” sucked the life out of Sterns case” I’ll just have to wait until I can read verified evidence. Hoping that it will be soon.

  4. Liann says:

    I agree TZ it does not make any sense,
    1. Look at the source, (TOPIX)?
    2. If it went so smashing for her why did it go on for 10 hours and not 7.
    3 How would any one know what Howard or L. Wood think? except for Howard and L Wood.
    4. Wilma told the truth, What is he going to say? She lied?. Coming from someone that supports team Tx. hard to figure that one out.
    5. How could her testimony suck the life out of Howard’s case? It is a depo. Q & A, It is not a trial yet.
    I just think those people at topix will always try and spin anything they can their way.

  5. sarah54 says:

    I know I should keep this short but I have a couple of things that I need to address. If anyone has any advice or suggestions they are welcome and appreciated.

    There is still a lot that I have to learn about the internet and especially blogs sites. I’ve tried to go to Topix.net several times to read different things that are referred to here at Rose’s that are posted at Topix but I can never find what I’m looking for when I get to the Topix site (I guess it doesn’t really matter if I read them since they all seem to be crap anyway. Just curious, I guess). I keep reading from comments here about a lot of the crap that is posted on Topix and other sites about anything ANS, HKS, LB, DLB, VA, etc, etc. Out of my own curiosity I would just like to read the crap for myself. Can anyone tell me how to access the above related blogs at topix. I guess you guys must think I’m really stupid but I had a teacher once tell me that there are no stupid questions only unasked ones.

    By the way, I wish the court system didn’t move so slowly so that everything could get settled sooner and the good guys could have there VICTORY DAY real soon. I hope that VA Team, RC, etc get their’s soon for all the mean, nasty and cruel things that they have been doing. That includes DO and her crew too.

    Rose Speaks is my #1 go to for all ANS related news. Thank you to Rose and all who contribute to this site for keeping the rest of us so well in formed.

    I never followed ANS’s life and only watched a few of The Anna Nicole Show episodes but after her death I came to learn that there was so much more to Anna Nicole the person than I had ever realized, What I have learned since her death is that she was a really good hearted person, had and unending abundance of love for her children, was very charitable, that there were/are a lot of people who loved her and a lot of people who held her in high regard, her life was very hard and she did what she had to to survive until her life came to such a tragic end. The things that have been done to Anna Nicole and Daniel’s memory, the ones who loved them and the crap that’s now out there for DL to read or hear about when she is older are so horrible that they are almost unbelievable. There are truly evil people in this world and this whole tragedy is proof of that.

    I am a 50ish married mother of 2 and I live in the central part of the U.S. I have health problems that limit my energy level and concentration so I don’t get to read every comment, paper or download that is posted here at Rose Speaks but I do try to come here daily to read at minimum the latest articles from Rose. I have morals and I believe in treating people right. I DO NOT BELIEVE that people should disgrace themselves and commit horrible acts in search of the $$$ that they might make from it. I BELEIVE THAT HONESTY AND INTEGRITY ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN A LARGE BANK ACCOUNT, DESIGNER CLOTHES, MANSIONS, EXPENSIVE CARS AND/OR 15 MINUTES OF FAME. SOME PEOPLE’S 15 MINUTES OF FAME SHOULD BE 15 MINUTES OF SHAME FOR THEM. I’m not yelling by using caps, just emphasing the depth of my beliefs and value system.

    Thanks to all of you for your patience in letting me take some space for my questions and my personal info.

    Sorry this was so long but since I don’t comment very often and with all the imposters, hackers and other trouble makers that have been giving Rose and the others so much trouble I felt like I needed to tell a little bit about myself so everyone understands that I’m an honest and good person that is just interested in following what is happening with all things ANS related and waiting for the truth to come out so the evil ones get their due.

  6. flowerz says:

    Sarah, that was a very good post. Unless you have very thick skin and don’t scare easily, it’s really best not to go to topix and read. If you ever read TMZ, then that is pretty close to the same thing, except more personal info is released on the posters at topix. Most of it is just insults, but every now and then you find out some little helpful tidbits….like me just now finding out that Targets was the one who wrote the story on the Chronicle that magically disappeared into thin air. I honestly never knew that, and that he is also friends with Wilma.

    But, be prepared to be researched and identified if you should go there and put out for the world to see.

  7. Liann says:

    sarah54, Maybe it is a godsend that you don’t read that crap there, There is never really any discussion of the cases, it is more like a pit. Rose always puts up links or where she gets her info, and I think this is like a tongue and cheek thing, I read it on Topix too but took it with a grain of salt. and Rose has a great sense of humor

  8. Ann says:

    Raven [4]

    I agree. There’s really no way of knowing where that information is coming from or whether it’s true.

  9. ray says:

    Isn’t Target the one that admitted he or she wrote a phoney artical that looked like it came from a paper in Texas and when they called the paper said that it was not theirs. I don’t believe a thing that person has to say. Target just wants the attention he can get.

  10. BEVERLY says:

    I do not know,about anyone,but I will tell you,I sure would not brag about knowing Wilma,, it goes along with values and intergrity, .There is a statement “,You are known by the company you keep”.Everyone on Roses site is a class act,and I am glad ROSE keeps her site as such,I remember as kids,we used to say(sticks and stones will break my bones,but names will never hurt me)I am so happy Howard went to Texas,He has shown that time and time again,he has NO intention of backing down,You know that one passage from the good Lord,says it all,”What does it profit a man,if he gains the whole world,and losses his soul.

  11. BEVERLY says:

    I woke up this morning,had another thought,which sounds more like what Wilma,s friends are up to.Get everyone over on this site worked up,so just maybe,there would be a leak,and then they could say Howard is now proven to be untrustworthy.OQ does not want Howard to see his financial statement for a reason,and it has nothing to do with trust,This case was brought by Howard,it is Howard name OQ DRAGGED THROUGH THE MUD,and because OQ does not like it TO BAD,Howard should have access in any and all information,not only Lin Wood.Again OQ is trying to run the court case HIS WAY,

  12. NCUser1 says:

    I think we should all consider the source. I would not expect any less from the Virgie supporters. They will and have IMO defended a disgrace for 2 years now. To think or hope that they will see and know the truth is improbable. I had serious doubts about Wilma being totally truthful from the moment I heard she would be questioned. I believe there is enough evidence and contradicting testimony to prove any cover ups she has presented though.

    Howard has remained strong through out this ordeal and I believe he will remain steadfast.

  13. [...] bookmarks tagged wilma In Howard K. Stern vs. John O’Quinn and the O’… saved by 5 others     thecomputernerd01 bookmarked on 10/16/08 | [...]

  14. butterfly says:

    GOOD MORNING :) being that oquinn is attempting to blame his investigators( that researched internet posts HAHAHAHAHAHAHA) (at least us armchair went thru PUBLIC records….) i would think they would take the fall. Love to know the juicy stuff. Hks does get to answer oquinns summary judgement so might b some info exposed that way

  15. butterfly says:

    yea target swears that dannielynn was conceived in mexico… And thats FUNNY about the DNA results

  16. JMA says:

    I do not believe anything that comes from a Virgie supporter; they pull this crap every time there is court hearing or depositions. That little report yesterday it was so apparent they were just trying to get others worked up. It seems as though the Virgie supporters are trying to convince themselves Wilma told the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. Sorry, do not think she did! Did she tell the truth about the bloggers she had helping to do her dirty work? Did she truthfully give the names of those bloggers? Did she tell why she sent a blogger flowers and spoke to them on the phone?

  17. JMA says:

    butterfly who are they claiming Anna was with when Dannielynn was conceived in Mexico, Thompson. The BS these people come off with never seems to amaze me.

  18. JMA says:

    What really cracks me up is when the Virgie supporters are fed the BS; they take it as Gods truth and run with it.

  19. NCUser1 says:

    Why does Target think she was conceived in Mexico? Did he know Anna? I hadn’t heard that he knew her. We all know how that group is…when they either hear or more than likely create somthing positive towards their side then it’s like a heard of cattle all runnning for the grub.

  20. butterfly says:

    susan…hope some1 was able to get u link. I know someone else looking for it also

  21. NCUser1 says:

    What link does “susan” need? I didn’t see a Susan poster here so I could not fing the post

  22. BEVERLY says:

    BETH and ROSE————I have a question for you.please explain,WHY the court docs I am reading are untruthful,I thought anything such as court docs are to be truthful and accurate.OQ court docs are neither accurate or truthful.I have picked out so many it would take all day,but here is one’And let somebody lay blue in the bed and not try to get any medical attention for them is not a accident”Taz is a R,N, THAT STATEMENT IS FALSE AND MISLEADING.(2)”Howard Stern was there when they both got deadly sick and died,”DANIEL DID NOT GET DEADLY SICK,he layed down in bed and died, FALSE AND MISLEADING,How does OQ get away with handing in such FALSE DOCS?

  23. NCUser1 says:

    My post were going straight out on the board. Now all of a sudden it looks like I am being thrown in SPAM. That’s odd!

  24. NCUser1 says:

    OK Back Agian..hmm

  25. JMA says:

    NCUser1, Targets has the Virgie supports convinced he knew Anna personally. He was making the claim way back in TMZ.

  26. BEVERLY says:

    CASENO 07-60534-CIV DIMITROULEAS—————-(1O)Statement from Don Clark,”I am aware of the fact that John related his belief that Mr Stern was responsible fot the death of Anna Nicole on several different occasions. John actually stated on at least one occasion,that he believed that Howard K Stern murdered Anna Nicole. NOW TO ME THAT IS MALICE AND DOWN RIGHT SLANDER.And OQ meant ever word he said to whoever he said it to,

  27. Ann says:

    I found the post that Rose is quoting. It looks like the post is to Targets not by Targets. (page 1381) It was posted by “ur answer”. Also which case is being referred to as “the life being sucked out of”? Is it Stern v. Cosby or Stern v. O’Quinn? The deposition was for Stern v. Cosby. I don’t see how Wilma’s deposition could possibly suck the life out Stern v. Cosby since there are so many issues in play in that case.

    It really sounds like a made up post to me. If anything, I think Wilma would be distancing herself from posters at this point and not giving them a play by play.

  28. butterfly says:

    beverly… I cant read docs often just what yall say. These r quotes ALL from don clark or doc clark says oquinn said it?. The false ones r from oquinn still??? WOW. Thats crazy

  29. JMA says:

    Ann what was the location showing for the moniker “ur answer”

  30. JMA says:

    Never mind I found it. Funny neither one of them show a location so this tells me that it could had very well been Targets posting the supposed info under the moniker “ur answer” just my opinion.

  31. Ann says:

    JMA, with the game of musical chairs that is played over there with monikers it’s difficult to figure out who is saying what to whom. IMO no matter who posted it, the post doesn’t ring true to me. Even if Wilma did give out that information, I really don’t think she would admit to them that her deposition went badly for her if it did. Yikes, I can’t imagine what it would be like to be questioned by Lin Wood who is after my butt for hours and hours. It’s interesting that Klein instead of McCabe represented Clark. Maybe McCabe wasn’t thought of as being up to the task.

  32. JMA says:

    Ann, you are right Wilma would never admit to being caught in her many lies. That would be like Virgie admitting she never had a mother daughter relationship with Anna and we know that will never happen. Like I said earlier every time one of these case goes in front of the courts the BS begins and it’s always in favor of Virgie, O’Quinn, McCabe, Clark, Rita and Wilma. Those people try to act as though they have an inside life line to these people and are given privy information that the rest of the world does not know. I have never fell for their BS and never will; I will wait until it shows up in legal papers not when it shows up on Topix and defiantly not coming from a Virgie supporter. I know there is a lot happening behind the sense that we will never know so for those Virgie supporters spewing the BS it is not working for me.

  33. flowerz says:

    Ann, I don’t think you got to the first post that was made. Target’s name was used in the post, and it was stated in a post by itself. Target’s location never shows up. It did when he first started posting(Houston), but changed after the list of emails he put out. Posts do disappear there, though, so you do have to be fast. Another thing I have noticed is that the “judge it” changes very often. I read from the end post back and rate the ones I like and the rates will be missing when I get back to the last post again. Sad thing about Targets is he is really a very talented writer(he’s much better than the other four or five), and can be very charming when he wants to be. It’s a shame he is wasting his talent.

  34. JMA says:

    flowerz, I do agree Targets is talented and wasting it all on those Virgie supporters but he is no match for “Swims” and tends to show a bit of jealousy from time to time, as do the rest of the Virgie supporters.

  35. Beth says:

    For: BEVERLY

    KEY WORDS: > ‘legitimate nondiscriminatory reason’
    http://library.findlaw.com/1998/Jun/1/131663.html
    “On the discrimination claim, the court reiterated the approach announced in its initial decision that once a plaintiff establishes a prima facie case and defendant articulates a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason, plaintiff can survive a motion for dismissal by:
    1) presenting evidence that the defendant’s proffered reason is not believable only if such proof also raises a genuine issue that “discriminatory animus was a motivating factor underlying the employer’s adverse action” or
    2) presenting other direct or circumstantial evidence that discrimination was a motivating factor.”

    Beverly,
    Hello, hope you are well… I have been so very busy last few days.
    I am not sure if this is what you are looking for in your question on #20; concerning the Court documents being false.
    *The burden of proof in civil cases is what the Court goes by. The defendants (O’Quinn) can say pretty much anything, or any of his people like Clark can say how they came to the conclusion of why they said and did what they did.
    IF it DOES NOT meet the burden of proof according to the legal laws, then they will lose. I know it is very upsetting to see that garbage and those out and out lies… But no worries, as I sincerely believe that they (O’Quinn, Clark, WV, VA ,ect…) will be shown to have an agenda that they were following:
    ‘GET HKS OUT OF THEIR WAY’

    Due to this agenda, there definitely is a: ‘MALICIOUS INTENT TO HARM AND DEFAME’
    I would bet that there is NO WAY that O’Quinn will dare let this go in front of a jury!
    There is way too much evidence of the Texas conspiracy, of O’Quinn and his law firm, of Don Clark and Wilma V. with the help and instigation of Jackie Hatten. Jackie truly needs jail time for her actions of revenge in this saga IMO.

    Ending in: There is NO ‘legitimate nondiscriminatory reason’ for O’Quinn and his law firm’s actions.
    **The actions WERE: DISCRIMINATORY AND PLANNED.
    O’QUINN WILL LOSE. (at least I hope and pray for that justice)

  36. NCUser1 says:

    #24…JMA. I may be wrong but I believe that I know who targets is and just a little bit about him. I would doubt he knew Anna. But then again she had an assortment of friends, didn’t she? I still doubt it. I feel Targets writing skills are wasted and I also feel strongly that he has been used by the Virgie clan. JMO …lol.

  37. Beth says:

    Oh, I went ahead and used this above example (Discrimination) as I believe it also applies to Defamation Cases.

    I truly do not think the Court will believe these lies and garbage that O’Quinn and company are stating to be true.

    Truth is a Defense. That Texas law firm should start practicing telling the truth, this is why they have been in front of the Ethics Board so many times.
    Also why they have been sued by their former clients and former attorneys that have worked with them.

  38. BEVERLY says:

    BUTTERFLY——–I cannot believe that OQ got away with handing in the lies I read as court docs,OQ is trying to undermine the Florida police Department and the Bahama inquest,and making his own case the way he wanted it to turn out,What I read in oq court docs were false and inaccurate statements.ALSO statements from Don Clark,telling the judge most of his information is from the internet and unreliable sources.although Clark claims they are reliable,BOY WHAT A SICK PUNCH OF DOGS,

  39. JMA says:

    NCUser1, oh I agree most defiantly and they are still using him. Maybe someday, you can share with us what you think you may know about them, not here though, we know better than that.

  40. JMA says:

    Beth, I am hoping for those times O’Quinn has been in front of the ethics board is shared with the judge’s involved in Stern vs. O’Quinn and the judge hearing the Arthur vs. Stern due to its O’Quinn’s firm who is representing Virgie.

  41. Beth says:

    JMA,
    What a wonderful idea!
    As O’Quinn got his friend Rusty to write a letter and submit it to the FL Court > To try to establish HKS cannot be trusted…

    Lin Wood and Howard need to present O’Quinn’s background information of all is UNETHICAL practices to the FL Court! To establish his:
    Intentional Defamation in order to achieve their (his client ; Virgie and his own) agenda.

    Well, I am off for a few hours… take care.

    **Shout out to Sammy! Curious to see what you thought of the last Debate…

  42. BEVERLY says:

    THANK YOU VERY MUCH BETH—– For taking your time to answer me.OQ is a Officer of theCourt,not judge and Jury,Don Clark and OQ are HYPOCRITES.OQ is trying to say anyone that believed him is stupid,those shows are tabloid,yet that is what Don CLARK USED TABLOIDS TO ACCUSE hOWARD,of everything they could,and get away with it.

  43. Roxanne says:

    Are you serious? They really say that Larry isn’t Dannielynn’s father and their reasoning is because THEY never saw the DNA test? What is up with those people?

    It’s funny that they are beating their chest about Wilma. “Sucked the life out of Stern?” LMAO. Of course Wilma would say that. I’m betting it went more along the lines
    Wilma: No, I didn’t do or say that.
    Woods: Well, what is this?
    Wilma: *damn it*

    Now, I have no inside knowledge of anything that has happened in any of these lawsuits. I have never talked to HKS, LW, Bonnie Stern or anyone connected to any of those people. The above little display is just “satire.” Nothing more.

    *you know it’s a shame to have to put in a disclaimer like above*

  44. JMA says:

    Roxanne you are too funny :lol:

  45. Ann says:

    In regard to the hearing tomorrow, I bet the judge didn’t even know what the heck O’Quinn was talking about when he put those things in about Wood and Howard. He probably wants some kind of context. I see it as a good oppotunity for Howard and Wood to put their side of things into the record.

  46. Roxanne says:

    I’m sure they will Ann.

    O’Quinn: Here it is judge. When HKS was a young attorney he took some papers off a table that were left there by that idiot RH, who by the way is now out of the blue and with no connection to us at all, giving affidavidt’s for the O’Quinn law firm. Anyway your Honor, he can’t be trusted

    Wood: Ok “bucky do no good” you asked for it. Your Honor, let me start with exhibit A, this show’s how O’Quinn has been sued and a judgement won by his clients in a breast implant case……. Here’s exhibit B your honor, this shows where O’Quinn was put up before the courts in Fl. for ambulance chasing…….. Exhibit C………

    Satire of course

  47. Rose says:

    Texas Court sets Hearing Date on Status of Lawsuit

    October 16, 2008, the Court issued an Order for a Status Conference on the case of Virgie Arthur vs. Howard K. Stern and CBS for 4:00 PM on November 4.

    http://www.rosespeaks.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&op=getit&lid=1122

  48. Beth says:

    Thanks Rose. ps> GREAT DEBATE! – last night, don’t you think?

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/status+conference
    status conference
    “a pre-trial meeting of attorneys before a judge required under Federal Rules of Procedure and in many states to inform the court as to how the case is proceeding, what discovery has been conducted (depositions, interrogatories, production of documents), any settlement negotiations, probable length of trial, and other matters relevant to moving the case toward trial. Court rules usually require the filing of a status conference statement prior to the conference. In Federal courts the status conference is also the occasion for setting a trial date.”
    __________________________________________________________________

    “…what discovery has been conducted…” Probably NONE! LOL
    Therefore if I was the Judge… I would Order this FRIVOLOUS LAWSUIT; DISMISSED
    (for being STUPID & MERITLESS) JMHO ;)

  49. Beth says:

    Wait a minuet! I had completely forgot the two affadavits from _____ and ______! :lol:
    Yes, these two people who put O’Q, McCabe, Clark & Virgie up on a pedestal!
    These two nuts who are and always have been jealous of this site and this site owner’s success…
    The two people who started and did the things they accuse this site owner of in their affadavits…
    She said, she said bunch of crap lies that cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt…
    NO PROOF of any merit in a Court of Law, and besides Virgie can show NO LOSS…

    Again; CASE DISSMISSED!
    (for being STUPID & MERITLESS)

  50. Tianna says:

    Thanks Rose, I got back in.

  51. kate says:

    Thought I’d post this little tidbit of info for those that feel Anna’s jewels were mishandled(eye roll).

    “J. Sugarman Auction Corp has appointed Arthur Horowitz, a former auctioneer of New York City to handle this auction. Among other high profile sales, Horowitz has auctioned off jewelry of the late Playboy Playmate Anna Nicole Smith, after the City of New York repossessed them from the estate of J. Howard Marshall, for nonpayment.”
    http://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/10/prweb1478304.htm

  52. flowerz says:

    Kate, that is a great find! That ought to shut up the ones who were so worried about Anna’s jewelery that some have accused Howard of hiding or selling. I wonder why VA didn’t tell her fans that is what happened to them since they were on speaking terms at that point in time.

  53. Ann says:

    Swim has a very good post about the O’Quinn-Hardin-Pirtle-Elaine Marshall connection

    Post #430

  54. JMA says:

    Kate [51] great find and thanks for sharing this with everyone.

    flowerz, I doubt even with the proof Kate provided they would believe it. You are probably right Virgie may have but that lie in their heads. Probably because she could not get her grubby paws on any of it, which we know if she would have she would had sold it to the highest bidder.

  55. JMA says:

    Ann, wow Swims comment/post makes so much sense. Thanks, for sharing for I always enjoy reading Swims post and there is no doubt whomever he/she are they are very intelligent and never ever fall for the Virgie supporters bashing of them.

    I think we all could learn from Swims on how to ignore the ignorant.

  56. TZ says:

    Glad to see that we got some sort of update on that completely stupid and waste of time VA v. HKS case. Hopefully the judge will finally dismiss it once and for all on 11/4. And still dont know why it has taken this long for it to not be dismissed?

    Roxanne(43), Yup….lol!

  57. JMA says:

    Correction for my comment #55

    Virgie may have “put” that lie in their heads.

  58. JMA says:

    This is in reference to my name being mentioned elsewhere.

    I have a long time ago learned to ignore the ignorant ;-)

  59. NCUser1 says:

    I think anyone reading or posting at Topix would require the knowledge to ignore the ignorant. They function on idiocy.

  60. NCUser1 says:

    FYI : I’ll be gone for about a week …….leaving early in the morning ….I’ll check in when I get back . Take Care

  61. JMA says:

    You are so right NCUser1 they do function on idiocy. Take care and we will see you when you return.

  62. Sammy1 says:

    Beth – thaks for the shoutout. Let me know when you can meet for chat.

  63. Beth says:

    Hello Sammy!
    It is almost 1:15 pm here… just stepped in from work.
    I hadn’t seen you post much, was getting worried – glad you are OK.

    *I haven’t tried chat since I was there in the evening the other day… Seems that I made someone uncomfortable… ;) as with trouble w/ my name and all.
    Which I thought was kind of comical, when I stated who I was… and they had a fairly new nic and said they wanted to not say who they were.
    I am pretty sure I know and therefore left – only due to the fact I so disagree w/ that person on many things.

    But, I will try and see if I can get on chat. If so, how about 2:00 pm if you see this in time? Thanks. ~B~

  64. Beth says:

    Well I had to re-register… but the new chat accepted me this time.

    I am free from 2:00 to 2:30 pm today or tomorrow morning anytime, so please let me know if you can.

    I think Barack did great in the debate, I still do not think that this is a slam-dunk though.

  65. Sammy1 says:

    Beth – sorry I was late in checking for your message. What time on Saturday would be good for you? Know you have kids, I only have my dog. I’m more flexible.

  66. hmm says:

    I have not even attempted to get in the new chat,will one day.Ann thanks for the link to swims posts IMO he is great.I have had a feww cyber conversations with him from long ago and he just makes so much sense.Take care NCuser and have fun,sara I have only followed links to topix so don’t know where to find the site but sometimes I have had to scroll thru to get to the comment that someone commented on.Glad to seer everyone is here and ok.Beth,Sammy I think he did well alsoin the debate.Take care everyone

  67. hmm says:

    Forgot to ask reading over at TMZ someone mentioned that Larry is sue Rita now and maybe her employer is that true or just a poste rumor?

  68. Beth says:

    Yes hmm, I agree about Obama doing very well in the last debate. I actually think in all 3 of the debates…
    Boy, the Republicans are really playing nasty with their recorded phone messages… Scare Tactics! IMO
    LOL One Republican (the one w/ the scary eyes!) I cannot remember her name… went on Hardball w/ Chris Matthews and said the news media needs to investigate the Congress and see who is Anti-American like Obama! What a nutcase! This radical right-winged lunatic needs to get out of politics!
    I hope and pray she NEVER gets elected to any public office again!

    Miss Sammy,
    We keep missing each other…
    I will try to go on chat at 9:00 am PT (11:00 am blog time) *I will come on blog first and say I am in chat for you.
    Hope we get a chance to visit, I have missed you! Have a nice evening; hope to talk to you in the morning.

  69. TZ says:

    hmm-I could be completely wrong but I thought it was now too late for Larry to sue Rita. I was under the impression he had a year to file the lawsuit so
    that would have been in early Sept. I hope I am wrong and he still can sue Rita and does! I’ll keep my eyes open for a hopeful lawsuit against Cosby.

  70. Beth says:

    Just browsing around Google, and checking if there were any new articles out on some of these players…
    I ran across this one from about 8 months back.

    http://www.nypost.com/seven/02042008/gossip/pagesix/now__thats_not_nice__granny_124826.htm
    OMG! Remember this link guys? That picture truly shows the callousness of VA in my opinion.
    Lin & HKS need to introduce this article of the NY Post to help in that damn nonsense of a case in TX…
    you know the case where virgie states she was conspired against! :lol:
    “…She’s hunting media deals within days of her grandson’s demise,…” WHAT?? Was she conspiring against herself? ;)

    (Boy, Opri sure is quite these days!) Nothing new on the press releases on her site.
    Also, I went to Rita’s site – I cannot believe that she is still trying to sell that book!
    The minuet a defamation suit was filed; she should have been legally forced to cease all sales of the book until the outcome of the trial. IMO

    Well, it is a few minuets after 10:00 pm here and I am beat! It’s been a long week. Good night all.

  71. BEVERLY says:

    WELL BETH——–That article shows the Virgie I got to know,and despise through her actions,and the picture shows the evil in that person.To me the New York Post article says it all in a nutshell.You know what I love,the place Anna chose to live and be buried was the place that saw right through Virgie Arthur,and her group of sickos,Virgie tried her best to fool the bahama people,I was at my sisters house,when in the evening,after dinner we sat down to watch TV.I could not believe what I was seeing,the news showed Virgie Arthur with a bible ,down on Anna,or Daniel grave looking up th the heavens,for camera shots.I am almost positive that book of Rita,s again was meant for the bahama people,Virgie was (working the crowd) she played to the likes of crowd so she thought,And it is because of that article,when Virgie cases is closed,i would like Howard to take a FULL PAGE ON THE DECISION.

  72. JMA says:

    I guess there is no news about yesterday’s hearing.

    Beth I remember that article and yes maybe Lin Wood should present it to the court. I do not see the Texas case going very far or at least not a win for Virgie. There is enough proof showing that Virgie made herself a public figure right after the passing of her grandson. The whole case is stupid in my opinion.

  73. JMA says:

    OK I know I said that I ignore the ignorant but I must comment about my name brought up elsewhere now going on two days. Yes the biddies’ hard-on for me continues. The joke is on them due to the credit they give me thinking I hold all this info involving various people and chats. I was never part of any of these sites [besides blogging on TMZ right after Anna Nicole past] until I joined Rose Speaks January of this year.

    So thank you all who once said I was stupid but now seem to think I hold all this valuable information.

    Conclusion, I only leave comments at Rose Speaks due to other places are not worth my time.

  74. Beth says:

    Good morning everyone.

    OT – re: politics
    On #69 yesterday I mentioned that Republican lady who went off on Obama and the liberal Democrats in Washington… This did not only blow my mind- it is spreading like wildfire! I sincerely do not wish this nut any bad wishes, but I do hope that the people she represents throws her out of office and she is NEVER elected again! Short video on this link below, if anyone is interested.
    IMO – She went so far over the line! Damn I just want to scream!

    http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/bachmann-anti-american/
    “Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) attacked the patriotism of Sen. Barack Obama…”

    (the short article ends with this statement from Palin)

    “Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) made similar comments at a fundraiser yesterday, saying that she loved to visit “pro-America” areas of the country — “small towns” where “hard working” people are “very patriotic.”

    WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?
    “Bachmann called on the media to conduct investigations into the anti-American activities of members of Congress…”

  75. Beth says:

    SAMMY,
    Is 9:00 am PT, 11:00 am blog time good for you to meet?

  76. Sammy1 says:

    Beth – I’m in chat just waiting for you. Come on over.

  77. flowerz says:

    # 74 JMA, don’t feel bad, they think I’m there, too. I have noticed in the past, they guess all the wrong ones, until ‘one person’ gets there and it seems like she always knows, you know, the one behind the scenes! I must admit it has been interesting as of late, I hope someone is taking shots of it. Since I’m like you, and don’t know what went on, I’m staying out of it. I really don’t see how one particular person(or more) should be there running their mouths with a case coming up soon.

  78. misssadie says:

    Hello everyone. Been following politics so I’ve been missing in action here. Lots to get caught up on I see.

    Beth #75: I thought my head was going to explode watching that woman! I’m glad Chris Matthews just let her hang herself. Her opponent has gotten lots of contributions since that show. If McCain is elected this country is down the tubes, at least that’s my opinion.

    I haven’t been to Topix to read for months. I would not beleive a word that comes from there.

  79. Beth says:

    Good to see you Miss Sadie! Yes, Chris did let her get in trouble, didn’t he! ;)

    Well I see that Bachmann and Palin have one thing in common… it seems they both believe in:
    “Creationism” http://www.answers.com/topic/creationism

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Bachmann
    Michele Bachmann From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW HEIGHTS CHARTER SCHOOL
    “Parents charged Bachmann with trying to set up classes on “Creationism” and advocating “something called ‘12 Christian principles’ be taught, very much like the 10 Commandments.” Bachmann and the board of directors also refused to allow the in-school screening of the Disney film “Aladdin_ 1992 film)”, feeling that it endorsed magic/witchcraft and promoted “Paganism”.

    Well have a great day, I am off to try and get some things done…

  80. JMA says:

    flowerz, exactly I too have no clue what went down then except for what I have read but the Biddies’ seem to think differently considering they claim certain posters are me. I said in one of our topics that I would no longer waste my time posting on responding to post over at Topix and I meant it. Seriously, you cannot fix stupid when it comes to those people over at Topix. Looks like the real joke is on them due to many of us from Rose Speaks will no longer lower ourselves to interact with the loonies, oops I mean Biddies’. Yes, not just one but a few should not be running their mouths over there while the Texas suit is still ongoing, oh and any suit involving Wilma as well!

  81. JMA says:

    Oh, flowerz I forgot to add. I do not feel bad for myself, I feel bad for those who were stupid enough to befriend or trust O’Quinn/Clark/McCabe/Virgie/Wilma.

  82. misssadie says:

    She just got elected in 2006 (2+ / 0-)

    to an open seat. (Vacated by Mark Kennedy who got whipped by Amy Klobuchar for MN-Sen).

    For those who don’t know, Bachmann was a wing-nut state rep who beat Patty Wetterling in 2006. Patty is a Minnesota (and National) icon for her work on missing children, starting when her son went missing ~20 years ago. I strongly supported Wetterling, including co-host fund-raiser, etc. It remains incredibly disappointing that Bachmann beat Patty.

    I hope El can pull this out. I think he has had minimal support until very recently, this day on dKos will certainly help him immensely.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/17/201620/51/613/633997

    This is the Wiki page on Wetterling: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patty_Wetterling

    I have things to get done too. I’ll try and get back on later.

  83. Beth says:

    Thank you Miss Sadie for those links and information… I hope she (Bachmann) never gets re-elected to ANY PUBLIC OFFICE!

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/18/obama-rally-in-st-louis-d_n_135826.html
    October 18, 2008, 1:48 pm
    Obama Rally Draws 100,000 in Missouri
    WoW! You should see the PIC on this site!!!! YES!!!

  84. snoopy says:

    Beth # 64, I want to clarify your post, if I may. It might be more polite to keep your opinions on others posters here to yourself, as to not stir up trouble. She has not spoken on your views, as she too may disagree with them. Different views should not be up for debate here, as we all differ in ways. Everyone is being cautious as they should be, especially in chat. We knew someone with those initials you were using. We were trying to protect her, if someone was using them there. One questioned it, you explained, they said OKAY. You understood, so we thought, said why you had to use them, would get it fixed and left. I like reading your post, I also like the person in question with those initials. A simple change of names would have taken care of it. It was not a huge deal. I wanted to clarify that poster did nothing wrong. I hope all is good with you, and glad it has been fixed for your future chat. No one wants or tries to hurt anyone’s feelings here on purpose. This could have been nicer, taken somewhere else. Peace.

    JMA, do not worry about what they write about you. Let it roll off and laugh about it. What they say is never important to worry about. We all know how sweet and kind you are, and you do not post there.

    Rose, cute comments about Targets! He does like to chat away at times.

  85. JMA says:

    Actually snoopy I rather find it amusing that they think I hold all this powerful info, the same info I am just learning myself. I do feel bad for the poster “Pathological” for being called me, Lord knows I do not have that kind of smarts so the joke is on the Biddies’ once again :lol:

  86. BEVERLY says:

    SNOPPY———I do not find anything wrong with what Beth had to say,I disagree with you,and I do not think she needs a lecture from you,I find you very rude,I RESPECT ALL OF BETH COMMENTS.

  87. snoopy says:

    JMA, yes it and they are funny to read. Ah, you do have as much smarts as the next person. :-)

    Bev, that post was to Beth. You were not there and do not know about what happened. Therefore hard for you to comment. My comment was polite considering it was ever brought up to begin with. She made her comment and I replied. Subject over.

    sarah #5, your words were very enlightening. I enjoyed reading your post.

  88. Beth says:

    #88 > Tread carefully – I did not address you in #64, and as far as you telling me to be polite… Well, bite me.
    Your #85 post did cause trouble, and now your #88 post addressing Beverly is causing more trouble. How dare you state it is hard for her to comment!
    WTH are you trying to do? Make two long time posters of this blog mad and not post here anymore?
    The subject is NOT OVER, and believe me you will not prevail on this one.
    Beverly is completely right, keep your lectures where you identify members here by name to yourself… do you notice I did not say who I thought it was in #64. It had nothing to do with anyone’s views it had to do with actions that affected me. I do not have to be cautious, as I do not mingle with the people who do not support this site…
    The person on chat directed me that it would be better to change my name… That was rude, as was your post #85 and #88. I left chat and chalked it up to immaturity, not quite sure what to chalk these latest actions up to.
    I will tell you this, if you are ever rude to Beverly again – that will be the last time I ever post here.
    So, as I stated in the first line > Tread carefully & bite me. Thank you.

  89. snoopy says:

    Stick your tread down your bite. You did address me. I was the poster in the chat. She nor anyone can comment if they were not there. You beleive me when I say I will. I did not write anyone’s name other than their moniker. So again, shove your tread down your bite. Post in regard to the story and not your opinions on other posters. I was trying to help you by changing your name in chat, so no one would think you were there impersonating anyone, as I did. YW

  90. Rose says:

    Gentle readers…. remember we have new ppl and ppl who read but are AFRAID to post… let’s don’t run them off please…

    Remember attack the subject and not the poster… simple part of our TOS, sometimes it is best to step back, take a deep breath before replying….

    Now I for one would love to see a political section in the forums for I would LOVE to discuss the up coming election and some of the B. S. I see going on in the media and the fear mongers…. Do y’all think we could have a political forum for us Obama supporter and I will put up a McCain one too… so do y’all think we can do that without getting into a forum political “war”.

    Sorry I have not been around but I have had a mild set back in my medical condition but should be up to full steam I am hoping by tomorrow….

    If in doubt about a poster use the private message feature in the forums PLEASE…. I really try not to ask for much of any of you, or I try not to… :(

  91. BEVERLY says:

    SNOOPY—-If this discussion was in chat that were it should have stayed,All through school,and nusing school I have learned to show respect,Beth has worked hard,in helping everyone,on the board,I have nothing but the greatest respect for her as moderator,and i find a great help with all my questions,and I also can tell a very nice person.I resent the fact ,that you did not keep this in the chat room,instead of making public your opinion on a open board,

  92. Rose says:

    A few housekeeping notes here…

    1. Lyndal finally moved out of the mold filled home… qualified for a FEMA trailer but instead took the tiny bit of money they offered her as a total write off of everything in her home and has found a roommate… “they” were suppose to move her phone on Friday, but it has not been connected at the new address YET… she will let us all know when she is BACK and online…

    2. Daisy had her power supply go out, right as she came back from vacation… so she will be offline until at least Wed. or Thurs.

    3. Then there are a couple of our members feeling like they are being cyber stalked by some posters on other sites so they are changing their monikers everywhere for their own safety… If ANY of you EVER feel cyber stalked and need to change your moniker, please contact a moderator/admin in an email and we will try to help any way we can.

    4. We are getting a new easier to use chat and so the chat might be down a bit tonight and tomorrow as it is changed over…

    5. If something starts somewhere (I. E. forum or chat) leave it there, remember we opened the blog to ALL and we have new members and timid members, just keep that in mind and don’t scare them before they feel like they are “safe to post”. Some come to us not trusting because of bad experiences on other sites… VERY SAD, but here we try to keep you all as safe as possible without censoring you.

    Remember as always I have an open door email door for all of you… :)

  93. hmm says:

    Rose we do have a political forum up it is just not seperate and posters have been trying very hard to keep it polite.I agree with Rose we don’t need to be divided we can state our opinions but be polite

  94. snoopy says:

    Bev, I agree with you 100%. That is why Beth should have left it in the chat and not put it on this board. You can resent her for bringing it here in the first place, and her opinion about it. I am new and did not deserve that at all. I can be as sweet as the poster writing. Now instead of keeping this going when you were not involved, let it go. Subject over and dont with.

    Rose, I am so glad to hear Lyndal is doing better. Please tell her we are thinking about her.

  95. Rose says:

    #94 DUH hmm, I guess I should check the forum before I suggest something that someone else has done… Beth is invaluable on the forums and keeping topics up for all that are interesting….

    Also the state court in Texas has set a hearing date of November 21, at 1:30 PM to hear and decide the challenge to jurisdiction on Art Harris and Bonnie Stern but the Order states that the parties can REQUEST a hearing before that date if they want to… so perhaps we are going to see how the Texas District Court is going to go with this suit…

  96. BEVERLY says:

    ROSE——I thank the good Lord Lyndal refused the trailer.WHY did they offer to put her in one when they are unsafe.I heard people were getting sick,from the trailers.I do hope she has herself checked out,after staying in a home with mold,THE LEAVES ARE SO BEAUTIFUL,FALL IS THE VERY BEST.I am so glad Lyndal has a room mate,my food bill for me alone is over $300.00 a month.Has anyone try to buy a rib eye steak,?I could live a week on what you have to pay for 1 steak.Gas has gone way down.maybe food will be next,

  97. Beth says:

    Rose, this is absolutely ridiculous! You need to talk to privately to this person who is having so much trouble understanding!

    Quote: “I was trying to help you by changing your name in chat, so no one would think you were there impersonating anyone, as I did.”
    This IS THE PROBLEM! You directed (ordered) me to fix it so you (and others would not be uncomfortable) That is NOT ‘helping’ in anyone’s book! It seems that there is a problem with who is ‘resented‘… how childish is that? Someone was rude to me on chat, I stated to someone else I had to re-register do to that incident. Period. Seems like you cannot stop, if you want to blame me go ahead… I and everyone else knows that you had NO RIGHT to tell me to change anything.
    It is not my problem or anyone else’s problem that you change your name to where we do not know you. I do not mingle with people who do not support this site; therefore unless there is a technical problem I do not have to change my name.

    *Rose, it is time to personally talk to this person… as they have again stated what Beverly can and cannot do: “She nor anyone can comment if they were not there.”
    This is OVER THE LINE. Can you fix it with this poster? To stop telling people what to do and maybe this will have some closure. Thanks.
    also> she told me to stick it and shove it… is this part of your TOS?
    ps> I honestly would not have been mad, if she would not have dragged Beverly’s name in this mess that she created by; directing people on what to do.

  98. snoopy says:

    Beth, no one ordered you. You said you were going to do it and we all said it was a good idea. It does help the person who’s intials you were using. You dont have to change your name, change the initials in chat you were using is all that was suggested. You are making this huge when it was tiny. You don’t concern yourself with who changes their names or why, unless it hurts someone else. Fix it? Take it to private. Not the place for it here, fix it is right. Now you fix it. Bev dragged her own self into it. Geeeze read first. Now drop it or take it someone else. A buch of us are in chat right now. Bring it there if you want to fight.

  99. Rose says:

    People PLEASE stop these posts are going to be copied and pasted on other forums… I will contact the people involved off of the board and get this sorted out….

    I am so sorry that 3 posters have hurt feelings, or think anyone is better than someone else… if there is any “stick it” comments I will edit those..

  100. Beth says:

    No,
    I will not sink down to your level, and it is clear that you like to fight. You have dragged this site down IMO.
    You just did it again! quote: “Now drop it or take it someone (somewhere) else”
    When YOU STOP TELLING ME WHAT TO DO… (or) Rose tells you to stop telling people what to do then this will be over.

    Rose, this will Stop if you explain in simple terms to this person… THAT THEY CANNOT ORDER PEOPLE AROUND.

  101. Rose says:

    Ok hmm I have started a political section, with 3 areas.

  102. Rose says:

    OK, folks the personal attacks stop NOW… this direction of the thread is done… :(

  103. Rose says:

    BTW Beth I do agree with you that no person that belongs to this blog can “order another person around”, I also agree that dragging a 3rd person Beverly into this was NOT appropriate… snoopy I agree with you also that this should have never came onto a public board. I have NO WAY to know what happened in chat, if anyone wants to email me and clue me in, that would be appreciated, as I have no idea what either of you are talking about.

    Now the direction of this thread is done, no “bite me” and “no stuff it”…

    With that folks I am going to bed… please be kind to each other … :(

  104. snoopy says:

    You sunk to your own level the second you posted about it on this board. It should have never been started, to have to STOP. You have no right attacking posters here. YOU are hurting this site by doing so. #64 is YOU who started it. I said subject over, and you keep bringing it up. The end, its over. We are in chat if you want to act like a bully.

    Rose, I am sorry this had to be brought here in the first place. Subject over for me. Thank you.

  105. snoopy says:

    Goodnight Rose

  106. sunflower says:

    FYI: To Viv at TOPIX, if this is you Vivian [of the QV site], you better stop posting the lies you are posting there about me. You better cease and desist from impersonating me over at TOPIX. The FBI I.T. department will be glad to let you and others know that my IP# has not been over at TOPIX and I don’t know how to use a blocker and don’t care too. AND I’m warning you, you better stop telling the lies you are about things you know NOTHING about.

    First of all I never gave Harvey Levin a genealogy I made up EVER. Harvey Levin very clearly stated he used the genealogy that Janice Brown made up that was posted at Court TV for his article. The one you posted on your best friend’s site, remember how you told everyone you cut and pasted it from Court TV and posted on her site under “Here It Is”. And you and Desert did not have Janice Brown’s permission to use it EITHER.

    I agree with Neal McCabe on one thing only when he said in his filings you were rude and nasty; he got that right.

  107. Beth says:

    I am sure it is very clear to all here I am no bully.
    It also seems very important to you to have the last word…

    Good night all.

    Hope you feel better Rose, and thank you for #104 as that is what I was looking for. I am done now.

  108. snoopy says:

    Chat was loads of fun and a lot of laughs. Thank you, to all of you, it was a fun evening. My computer frooze up. I came back and some were still there. They said we all got knocked off. Must the changes they are doing. Some are slowly coming back. To those who didn’t, sorry I missed you and goodnight.

    sunflower, we know you do not even go there and read. Sorry to hear someone was impersonating you. They do that out of boredom. You take care of yourself and I had fun chat last with you as well. Some good R & R is what we all needed.

    Rose, I sent you and email.

  109. sunflower says:

    It appears that SOME at Topix can’t read well, I SAID THAT “I MADE UP.” That’s right, I sent a copy of the one VIVIAN placed on QV’s site under “Here It Is.” The one she stole from Court TV’s board AND POSTED ON QV’S SITE. Also sent a copy of the article that Jane Devin wrote with the word “INCEST” in it. Harvey and I both have copies of that. Harvey WROTE HIS ARTICLE TO SHOW PEOPLE THERE WAS NO INCEST. JUST LIKE ROSE TRIED TO TELL JANE AND QV TO CHECK OUT THE INFORMATION BEFORE THEY PRINTED IT ON THE BLOG, BUT NO THEY DIDN’T DO THAT. AND LET’S NOT FORGET THAT JANE AND QV WERE THE ONES WHO ASKED EVERYONE TO MAIL THE INFORMATION TO THE MEDIA. QV HAD ALL THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF THE MEDIA ON HER SITE TO MAIL. AND THAT MAY STILL BE IN INTERNET ARCHIVES.

    snoopy, chat was fabulous. You’re so right out of boredom, it’s ashamed they don’t have a real life.

    Thanks gals for all the info on TOPIX, you’re the greatest.

  110. sunflower says:

    snoopy, you guys are right it’s like throwing raw meat in a loins cage at the Zoo. LOL OR fresh meat into a lake of Parana, LOL It’s been fun!!

    Looking forward to what’s coming up in court documents. Wonder how Don did on his depo??

  111. Roxanne says:

    No Beth you are not a bully.

  112. Ann says:

    Sunflower [110]

    Was Rose aware that you sent the information to TMZ? If so, when did you tell her that? Why didn’t you say anything before this? Or did you?

  113. JMA says:

    Was there something going on Friday concerning O’Quinn? If so, is there any info yet?

  114. sunflower says:

    Ann, please email me and I will explain, thanks! All the MODS have my email and Rose too!!

  115. Rose says:

    I just put a new article up with info. going on in several of the cases in several of the corts.. well most of the courts really.

    Also the chat has been changed over to the new one, there is a forum set up for the chat under annoucements, the topic is NOT locked so you can ask questions there…

  116. sunflower says:

    One more time for those you have problems with twisting the truth:

    This is what I wrote
    First of all I never gave Harvey Levin a genealogy I made up EVER. Harvey Levin very clearly stated he used the genealogy that Janice Brown made up that was posted at Court TV for his article. The one you posted on your best friend’s site, remember how you told everyone you cut and pasted it from Court TV and posted on her site under “Here It Is”. And you and Desert did not have Janice Brown’s permission to use it EITHER.

    Again for those with reading problems, I NEVER gave Harvey anything I researched or made up MYSELF. Like you have been trying to spin on Topix. The only person who made up a genealogy was Kim A. and Jane posted that. I sent the copy of the “Here It Is” genealogy from QV’s site. ASK Harvey!!! AND MANY PEOPLE SENT COPIES OF THE ARTICLE OUT NOT JUST ME.

  117. sarah54 says:

    sarah54 says:
    October 22nd, 2008 at 9:45 pm
    Thanks to all who responded to my post #5.

    To Rose and the moderators I hooe that you don’t think I’m out of line by posting these comments but I respect your comments about it.

    Right after ANS died I use to go to TMZ to get news and commented on several things. I do have a pretty thick skin but after a while I got so frustrated because people would viciously attack me and a lot of other people for mine/other’s. What they were attacking me for wasn’t even what I wrote about. I found that there were so many people that either didn’t comprehend what I was saying or they were so filled with hate/rage that they wanted to attack someone regardless of what the person posted unless they felt like that person was TOTALLY against HKS and LB. I would post comments questioning the possibilities that HKS & LB weren’t the evil people that they were being made out to be in the media. I would say that none as far as I knew none of the posters including me knew ANS, HKS or LB personally so we couldn’t know for sure what was going on in their personal lives and relationships. I would comment that it was possible that all the media reports iwere wrong. I posted these at as alternative possibilities not as facts or even opinions of fact and I would stll be viciously attackid for my character and my intelligence. A lot of them didn’t want to discuss the events of the subject matter of the articles they just wanted to attack others.

    At the time I was going to TMZ I wasn’t aware of Rose’s site. I found Roses’s site thru Art’s site. I started coming here for updates. I found that Rose didn’t just offer an editorial opinion she posted actual court filings and also the people were all very nice to one another. These are the reasons that I come here daily and read the blog. I read the comments, the downloads and post comments as my time and energy allow.

    I don’t know what the conflict was about as I wasn’t involved in the situation. I’m only posting this because the back and forth comments were troublesome to me. It concerned me that the confrontational comments could contaminate this site.

    I don’t ever want to offend or disrespect anyone on this site. I hope that my comments are taken within the spirit that they were made.

    I hope that the conflict/comments between the very limited few on this page are an isolated incident. I don’t care for confrontations of this type. I want Rose’s site to remain the friendly and polite site that I have found it to be. I hope that iif people have personal conflicts with each other thatt they will do it through the private email section on the site. This type of posting CAN keep new people from posting or even reading the comments on each article. They can also make new members and even older members leave the site. I would hate tp see this happen.

    I apoligize to all that this post is so long.

    Positive responses about this post are welcomed and appreciated. Negative comments are welcome as long as they are respectful to me.

    My we all remember that The Golden Rule says, “Do unto others as you would have them do until you.”

    Thank you Rose for the work that you and the volunteers do.

  118.  
Member of the Boxxet Network of Blogs, Videos and Photos Best of Anna Nicole Smith